4
CLINICAL CORNER: COMMUNICATION Clinical outcome of emergency egg vitrification for women when sperm extraction from the testicular tissues of the male partner is not successful Wen-Yan Song 1 , Ying-Pu Sun 1 , Hai-Xia Jin 1 , Zhi-Min Xin 1 , Ying-Chun Su 1 , and Ri-Cheng Chian 2 1 The Reproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, P. R. of China, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada The development of an effective oocyte cryopreservation sys- tem will have a significant impact on the clinical practice of reproductive medicine. However, the important option of emergency oocyte cryopreservation has yet to be well docu- mented. In this report, we review the cases of 15 women with male partners who were diagnosed with nonobstructive azoospermia and for whom testicular sperm extraction on the day of oocyte retrieval failed. Emergency oocyte vitrification was performed and after two months, the vitrified oocytes were warmed and the surviving oocytes inseminated with fro- zen-thawed donor sperm by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 117 mature oocytes from the 15 women were vitrified and warmed. The post-warming survival rate was 84.6% (99/117), and the fertilization rate following ICSI was 83.8% (83/99). We selected 30 embryos for transfer to 15 patients, 8 of whom became pregnant. The clinical pregnancy rate was 53.3% (8/15) and the implantation rate was 30.0% (9/30). Nine healthy live births resulted from 8 pregnancies. These results indicate that emergency oocyte vitrification is an effective rescue technique that can be applied clinically with acceptable pregnancy and live birth rates when testicular sperm extraction from the male partner failed on the day of oocyte retrieval. These results also highlight another important option for oocyte cryopreservation through the use of vitrifica- tion technology. Keywords egg, pregnancy, sperm, testicular tissue, vitrification Abbreviations ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NOA: nonobstructive azoospermia; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; E 2 : estradiol; COCs: cumulus-oocyte-complexes; ET: embryo transfer; MII: metaphase II; EG: ethylene glycol; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide. Introduction The development of an effective oocyte cryopreservation system would have a significant impact on the clinical practice of reproductive medicine. Such a program could be offered to cancer patients before gonadotoxic treatment and to infertile couples with moral or religious objections to embryo cryopreservation. In addition to fertility preser- vation for young women requiring medical treatment that would result in sterilization, cryobanking of oocytes would benefit a large population of single women who wish to delay motherhood for personal, professional, or financial reasons. Women suffering from premature ovarian failure who wish to conceive must rely on donor oocytes. Oocyte donation can be complicated and time consuming, requiring hormonal synchronization of the donor and recipient men- strual cycles. A successful oocyte cryopreservation protocol would eliminate the need for synchronization and enable the establishment of egg banks, facilitating the logistics of coordinating egg donors with recipients. Furthermore, egg cryopreservation allows for temporary quarantine of donor eggs to test the donors for transmissible diseases. Although oocyte cryopreservation provides many benefits, the importance of emergency oocyte cryopreserva- tion has not been emphasized. Many unexpected situations can occur during infertility treatment, including a male partner who is unable or refuses to produce semen. Surgical testicular retrieval of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm in- jection (ICSI) is widely used for treating men diagnosed with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) [Devroey et al. 1995]. However, spermatogenesis in NOA is usually limited, with only small foci spread over limited areas, so re- trieving sperm can be a challenge. Diagnostic biopsy has sig- nificant predictive value, but the chance that no sperm will be found is 25%-30% [Glina et al. 2005]. If sperm are not ob- tained then cryopreservation of oocytes or use of a sperm donor is the only possible alternative. However in some countries, like China, the use of donor sperm is impossible immediately requiring other options like, emergency oocyte cryopreservation until sperm can be recovered from the husband. To date, the information available for Address correspondence to Dr. Sun, Y-P, The Reproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, P. R. of China, E-mail: [email protected] or Dr. R-C Chian, Royal Victoria Hospital, Womens Pavilion F3, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1, E-mail: [email protected] Received 12 November 2010; accepted 22 December 2010. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 2011, 57: 210213 Copyright © 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. ISSN 1939-6368 print/1939-6376 online DOI: 10.3109/19396368.2011.566666 210 Syst Biol Reprod Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by SUNY State University of New York at Stony Brook on 10/26/14 For personal use only.

Clinical Outcome of Emergency e

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Clinical outcome of emergency

Citation preview

  • CL IN I CAL CORNER : COMMUN ICAT ION

    Clinical outcome of emergency egg vitrification for women when spermextraction from the testicular tissues of the male partner is not successful

    Wen-Yan Song1, Ying-Pu Sun1, Hai-Xia Jin1, Zhi-Min Xin1, Ying-Chun Su1, and Ri-Cheng Chian2

    1The Reproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, P. R. of China,2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    The development of an effective oocyte cryopreservation sys-tem will have a significant impact on the clinical practice ofreproductive medicine. However, the important option ofemergency oocyte cryopreservation has yet to be well docu-mented. In this report, we review the cases of 15 womenwith male partners who were diagnosed with nonobstructiveazoospermia and for whom testicular sperm extraction on theday of oocyte retrieval failed. Emergency oocyte vitrificationwas performed and after two months, the vitrified oocyteswere warmed and the surviving oocytes inseminated with fro-zen-thawed donor sperm by intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI). A total of 117 mature oocytes from the 15 womenwere vitrified and warmed. The post-warming survival ratewas 84.6% (99/117), and the fertilization rate following ICSIwas 83.8% (83/99). We selected 30 embryos for transfer to 15patients, 8 of whom became pregnant. The clinical pregnancyrate was 53.3% (8/15) and the implantation rate was 30.0%(9/30). Nine healthy live births resulted from 8 pregnancies.These results indicate that emergency oocyte vitrification isan effective rescue technique that can be applied clinicallywith acceptable pregnancy and live birth rates when testicularsperm extraction from the male partner failed on the day ofoocyte retrieval. These results also highlight another importantoption for oocyte cryopreservation through the use of vitrifica-tion technology.

    Keywords egg, pregnancy, sperm, testicular tissue, vitrification

    Abbreviations ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NOA:nonobstructive azoospermia; FSH: follicle-stimulatinghormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; E2: estradiol; COCs:cumulus-oocyte-complexes; ET: embryo transfer; MII:metaphase II; EG: ethylene glycol; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide.

    Introduction

    The development of an effective oocyte cryopreservationsystem would have a significant impact on the clinical

    practice of reproductive medicine. Such a program couldbe offered to cancer patients before gonadotoxic treatmentand to infertile couples with moral or religious objectionsto embryo cryopreservation. In addition to fertility preser-vation for young women requiring medical treatment thatwould result in sterilization, cryobanking of oocytes wouldbenefit a large population of single women who wish todelay motherhood for personal, professional, or financialreasons.

    Women suffering from premature ovarian failure whowish to conceive must rely on donor oocytes. Oocytedonation can be complicated and time consuming, requiringhormonal synchronization of the donor and recipient men-strual cycles. A successful oocyte cryopreservation protocolwould eliminate the need for synchronization and enablethe establishment of egg banks, facilitating the logistics ofcoordinating egg donors with recipients. Furthermore, eggcryopreservation allows for temporary quarantine of donoreggs to test the donors for transmissible diseases.

    Although oocyte cryopreservation provides manybenefits, the importance of emergency oocyte cryopreserva-tion has not been emphasized. Many unexpected situationscan occur during infertility treatment, including a malepartner who is unable or refuses to produce semen. Surgicaltesticular retrieval of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm in-jection (ICSI) is widely used for treating men diagnosedwith nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) [Devroey et al.1995]. However, spermatogenesis in NOA is usuallylimited, with only small foci spread over limited areas, so re-trieving sperm can be a challenge. Diagnostic biopsy has sig-nificant predictive value, but the chance that no sperm willbe found is 25%-30% [Glina et al. 2005]. If sperm are not ob-tained then cryopreservation of oocytes or use of a spermdonor is the only possible alternative. However in somecountries, like China, the use of donor sperm is impossibleimmediately requiring other options like, emergencyoocyte cryopreservation until sperm can be recovered fromthe husband. To date, the information available for

    Address correspondence to Dr. Sun, Y-P, The Reproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou,P. R. of China, E-mail: [email protected] or Dr. R-C Chian, Royal Victoria Hospital, Womens Pavilion F3, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal,Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1, E-mail: [email protected]

    Received 12 November 2010; accepted 22 December 2010.

    Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 2011, 57: 210213Copyright 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.ISSN 1939-6368 print/1939-6376 onlineDOI: 10.3109/19396368.2011.566666

    210

    Syst

    Bio

    l Rep

    rod

    Med

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    from

    info

    rmah

    ealth

    care

    .com

    by

    SUN

    Y S

    tate

    Uni

    vers

    ity o

    f N

    ew Y

    ork

    at S

    tony

    Bro

    ok o

    n 10

    /26/

    14Fo

    r pe

    rson

    al u

    se o

    nly.

  • emergency oocyte cryopreservation is very limited [Emeryet al. 2004; Kyono et al. 2005]. The objective of this studyis to report the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in 15women following the use of emergency oocyte vitrification.

    Results

    Before ovarian stimulation, all female patients underwent aphysical examination, trans-vaginal basal antral folliclecount, and a baseline hormonal profile on day 3 measuringfollicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone(LH), and estradiol (E2). The mean age of the women was27.9 2.8 years. The mean duration of infertility was 4.1 2.3 years. The mean levels on day 3 were 6.1 1.4; 6.2 3.4 IU/L for FSH, 5.6 2.6; 45.1 21.9 pg/L for LH, and43.8 25.3 pg/L for E2, respectively (Table 1). As shown inTable 2, a total of 135 COCs (cumulus-oocyte-complexes)were retrieved, and of these 117 oocytes were mature at theMII stage. Following warming, the oocyte survival rate was84.6% (99/117). A total of 83 oocytes were fertilized afterICSI, and the fertilization rate was 83.8% (83/99). Of the 83fertilized oocytes, 75 cleaved resulting in a cleavage rate of90.4% (75/83). A total of 30 selected embryos were transferredto 15 patients, an average of 2.0 0.8 embryos per patient. Tendays after ET (embryo transfer), 9 individuals were confirmedpregnant by beta-hCG followed by ultrasound 4 weeks afterET with a clinical pregnancy rate of 53.3% (9/15) and animplantation rate of 30.0% (9/30). After ET, the remaining45 embryos were re-vitrified for storage, and until nowthose re-vitrified embryos were not yet warmed.

    Obstetric analysis indicated 8 pregnancies with 9 healthyinfants born (7 singletons and 1 set of twins; Table 3). Of the9 infants, 5 were male and 4 were female; all had normal kar-yotypes. For the singletons, the mean gestational age was 39weeks + 5 days and the mean birth weight was 3,807 397.3g, while for the twins the gestation age was 38 weeks + 6 daysand the mean birth weight was 2,625 530.3 g.

    Discussion

    These results indicate that acceptable clinical pregnancy ratesand healthy live-births can be achieved from emergencyoocyte vitrification followed by the use of donor sperm forinsemination when it is not possible to extract sperm fromthe testicular tissues of the male partner. This suggests thatoocyte vitrification technology is an important option thatcan be applied to this unexpected situation during treatment.

    As mentioned previously, although diagnostic biopsy hassignificant predictive value, the chance that sperm cannotbe retrieved on the day of oocyte retrieval is 25% - 30%[Glina et al. 2005]. Some have suggested that the cryopreser-vation of sperm from TESE before treatment shouldbe implemented to prevent this situation [Wu et al. 2005].However, the loss of motility of testicular sperm fromfrozen-thawing procedures may result in a significantreduction in the fertilization rate. It has been reported thatin testicular biopsy samples from the patients with NOA,less than 3% of the sperm observed were motile [Lyrakouet al. 2007]. Therefore, finding sufficiently motile spermfor ICSI in frozen-thawed testicular tissues in NOA patientsis more difficult, resulting in no embryos being available fortransfer.

    In addition, it has been reported that immature spermfrom testicular tissues are much more sensitive to freezingand thawing, possibly leading to a higher rate of aneuploidyamong embryos conceived from these frozen-thawed sperm[Ravizzini et al. 2008]. Therefore, in our IVF center, we donot routinely freeze immotile sperm from testicular biopsysamples. It remains to be confirmed whether or not testiculartissues from diagnostic biopsy should be frozen as a back upfor NOA patients in case sperm cannot be retrieved on theday of oocyte retrieval [Kyono et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2008].

    Over the last five years, the new vitrification techniqueshave significantly improved the survival of cryopreservedoocytes, indicating that vitrification may be more effectivethan the slow-freezing method of oocyte cryopreservation[Kuleshova and Lopata 2002]. Vitrification of oocytes has re-sulted in relatively high survival rates [Kuleshova et al. 1999;Kuleshova and Lopata 2002; Yoon et al. 2003; Lucena et al.2006; Chian et al. 2008; Chian et al. 2009; Cao et al. 2009;

    Table 1. Patient demographic characteristics.

    No. ofpatient Age (yrs)

    Duration ofInfertility(yrs)

    Day 3FSHlevel(IU/L)

    Day 3LH level(IU/L)

    Day 3Estradiol

    level (pg/L)

    1 24 2 5.2 4.5 24.42 29 2 5.2 4.7 66.73 34 11 8.2 5.6 27.04 29 5 7.6 5.8 30.55 28 5 4.0 3.7 35.76 30 5 7.5 3.1 60.07 23 1 4.1 9.5 106.68 28 5 5.3 4.8 42.49 28 3 6.7 3.5 20.210 27 4 6.0 5.2 31.011 30 4 6.8 11.7 37.612 24 3 6.4 5.3 37.813 27 4 5.3 4.9 50.214 29 5 7.0 5.6 45.515 29 3 4.2 15.6 61.2Mean SD 28.2 2.9 4.3 2.6 6.1 1.4 5.6 2.6 43.8 25.3

    FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone.

    Table 2. Clinical outcomes following transfer of embryos producedfrom vitrified oocytes.

    Group characteristics Value

    Patients who underwent thawing and embryo transfer 15Mature (M-II) oocytes retrieved 117M-II oocytes vitrified and thawed 117Oocytes survived (%) 99 (84.6)Oocytes fertilized (%) 83 (83.8)Oocytes cleaved (%) 75 (90.4)Embryos transferred (meanSD) 30 (2.00.8)Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle started (%) 8 (53.3)Embryos implanted (%) 9 (30.0)Singleton pregnancies 7Twin pregnancies 1Live-birth rate per cycle thawed (%) 8 (53.3)Newborns 9

    Emergency egg vitrification 211

    Copyright 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

    Syst

    Bio

    l Rep

    rod

    Med

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    from

    info

    rmah

    ealth

    care

    .com

    by

    SUN

    Y S

    tate

    Uni

    vers

    ity o

    f N

    ew Y

    ork

    at S

    tony

    Bro

    ok o

    n 10

    /26/

    14Fo

    r pe

    rson

    al u

    se o

    nly.

  • Cobo et al., 2008; Cobo et al. 2010; Nagy et al. 2009; Rienziet al. 2010]. The results from this study showed an 84.6%survival rate, 30.0% implantation rate, and 53.3% clinicalpreg ancy rate following oocyte vitrification and thawing(Table 2), which are comparable to previously reported results.

    In our experience, we found the cleavage rate after fertili-zation from vitrified and thawed oocytes is lower than that offresh oocytes (Table 2, 90.4% in this observation). Further-more, the time of cleavage after fertilization from vitrifiedand thawed oocytes is also slightly delayed compared tothat of fresh oocytes. Therefore, the lower cleavage rateand time delay involved in cleavage need to be studiedproperly using fresh oocytes as controls. Interestingly,there were more embryos available after ET, because weonly transferred 30 embryos out of 75 cleaved embryos.Although the remaining embryos were not warmed for ET,it is possible to obtain viable pregnancies and live birthsfrom those re-vitrified embryos.

    It has been reported that pregnancies and infants con-ceived following oocyte vitrification are not associated withincreased risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes[Chian et al. 2008; Chian et al. 2009]. Although thenumber of pregnancies and live-births was small, theresults from our observation also support this finding(Table 3). In conclusion, these results indicate that emer-gency oocyte vitrification is an effective rescue techniquethat can be applied clinically with acceptable pregnancyand live birth rates when testicular sperm extraction is un-successful in the male partner on the day of oocyte retrieval.

    Materials and Methods

    From June 2008 to May 2009, 108 patients with NOA weretreated by TESE in the first affiliated hospital of ZhengzhouUniversity, China. Of these, we failed to extract sperm fromthe testicular tissues in 22 male patients (20.4%) on the dayof oocyte retrieval. After informed consent, 15 patientsaccepted emergency oocyte vitrification, due to failure ofsperm extraction from the testicular tissues on the day ofoocyte retrieval. Institutional review board approval wasobtained for this retrospective study.

    Ovarian stimulation was performed using a GnRHagonist (Triptorelin, Ferring GmbH, Germany) combinedwith recombinant FSH (Serono Laboratories, Switzerland)and HMG (Ferring GmbH, Germany), and then 10,000 IU

    of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Serono Labora-tories, Switzerland) was administered when at least twofollicles reached 18 mm in diameter. Oocyte retrieval wasperformed 36 h later.

    All male partners were diagnosized as NOA by hormonalassessment (FSH, LH, and testosterone), biochemical markerassessment (fructose and -glucosidase), karyotype analysis,and Yq microdeletion assessment. Testicular biopsy wasperformed and histopathological analysis demonstratedthat mature sperm were found in the testicular tissuesample in advance, but the testicular tissue was not frozen.

    Within 2 h of oocyte retrieval, COCs were exposed to 60IU/mL hyaluronidase for partial removal of cumulus cells.Only metaphase II (MII) oocytes were selected for vitrifica-tion. A modified vitrification method was adopted for cryo-preservation of the mature oocytes [Chian et al. 2005;Antinori et al. 2007]. Briefly, the oocytes were placed intoequilibration medium, containing 7.5% (v/v) ethylene glycol(EG) and 7.5% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), at roomtemperature for 5 min, and then the oocytes were transferredto vitrification medium, containing 15% (v/v) EG, 15% (v/v)DMSO, and 0.50 mol/L sucrose at room temperature for 45 to60 s. Two or three oocytes were loaded on a McGill Cryoleaf(Medicult Company, Denmark) and plunged immediatelyin liquid nitrogen for vitrification and then for storage.

    Two months later, the couples decided to use frozen donorsperm of the same blood type as the male partner and theoocytes were thawed by inserting the McGill Cryoleaf directlyinto warming medium (MediCult Company, Denmark) con-taining 1.00 mol/L sucrose for 1 min at 37C. The warmedoocytes were transferred into diluent medium-I containing0.50 mol/L sucrose and then into diluent medium-II contain-ing 0.25 mol/L sucrose for 3 min each. The oocytes werewashed twice in washing medium for 3 min each time afterwhich they were incubated in culture medium under 6%CO2 at 37C for approximately 2 h. Oocyte survival afterwarming was evaluated microscopically based on the mor-phology of the oocyte membrane integrity.

    Prior to ICSI, frozen donor sperm (Sperm Bank, HunanProvince, China) were thawed rapidly at 37C for 10 minin water. Cryoprotectant was removed by centrifugation at500 x g for 15 min and resuspension in 0.5 mL of freshmedium. A motile spermatozoon was injected into each sur-viving oocyte, and fertilization was checked approximately16-18 h after ICSI. Embryo transfer (ET) was performed

    Table 3. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of each patient following oocyte vitrification and thawing.

    Patient number Singleton (S) or twin (T) Gestational age (week+days) Birth weight (g) Karyotype Birth defect (yes or no)

    2 S 40 4,000 XY no3 S 39+2 4,400 XY no4 S 40 3,250 XY no6 S 39+3 3,500 XX no7 S 40 3,850 XY no10 S 40 4,100 XX no12 S 39+6 3,550 XY noMeanSD 39+5 3,807397.314 T 35 3,000; 2,250 XX; XX noMeanSD 38 +6 2,625530.3

    212 Song et al.

    Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine

    Syst

    Bio

    l Rep

    rod

    Med

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    from

    info

    rmah

    ealth

    care

    .com

    by

    SUN

    Y S

    tate

    Uni

    vers

    ity o

    f N

    ew Y

    ork

    at S

    tony

    Bro

    ok o

    n 10

    /26/

    14Fo

    r pe

    rson

    al u

    se o

    nly.

  • under trans-abdominal ultrasound guidance on either day 2or 3, depending on the number and quality of the embryos.Before ET, assisted hatching was performed with a lasersystem OCTX (Eyeware TM Company, Germany). Clinicalpregnancy was defined as the presence of a fetal sac withheartbeats revealed by ultrasonography.

    The endometrial lining was prepared for approximately 2w using E2 transdermal patches until the endometrial thick-ness was 8 mm in patients naturally menstrual cycle beforeoocyte warming. Progesterone (100 mg/d) was started whenthe oocytes were warmed, continuing until the time of -hCG assay. Both E2 and progesterone were continued forluteal support until the 12th w of pregnancy if positive clini-cal pregnancy was confirmed.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by a grant from the National HighTechnology Research and Development Program of China(863 Program) (No. J2006AA02Z4A4).

    Declaration of Interest: The authors, W.Y. Song, Y.P. Sun,H.X. Jin, Z.M. Xin, and Y.C. Su, have no declarations of in-terest. R.C. Chian has interest in McGill Cryoleaf, Origio(MediCult) Company, Denmark.

    ReferencesAntinori, M., Licata, E., Dani, G., Cerusico, F., Versaci, C., Antinori, S.

    (2007) Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high sur-vival rate and healthy deliveries. Reprod Biomed Online 14:7279.

    Cao, Y.X., Xing, Q., Li, L., Cong, L., Zhang, Z.G., Wei, Z.L., et al.(2009) Comparison of survival and embryonic development inhuman oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification.Fertil Steril 92:13061311.

    Cobo, A., Kuwayama, M., Perez, S., Ruiz, A., Pellicer, A., Remohi, J.(2008) Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with freshand cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotopmethod. Fertil Steril 89:16571664.

    Cobo, A., Meseguer, M., Remohi, J., Pellicer A. (2010) Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective,randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod 25:22392246.

    Chen, G.A., Cai, X.Y., Lian, Y., Zheng, X.Y., Qiao, J., Chen, X.N., Ye,R.H. (2008) Normal birth from cryopreserved embryos after intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection of frozen semen into vitrified humanoocytes. Human Reprod 11:4951.

    Chian, R.C., Son, W.Y., Huang, J.Y., Cui, S.J., Buckett, W.M., Tan SL.(2005) High survival rates and pregnancies of human oocytes

    following vitrification: preliminary report. Fertil Steril 84: S36(Abstract).

    Chian, R.C., Huang, J.Y., Tan, S.L., Lucena, E., Saa, A., Rojas, A., et al.(2008) Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceivedfrom vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 16:608610.

    Chian, R.C., Huang, J.Y., Gilbert, L., Son, W.Y., Holzer, H., Cui, S.J.,et al. (2009) Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitroand in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril 91:23912398.

    Devroey, P., Liu, J., Nagy, Z., Goossens, A., Tournaye, H., Camus, M.,et al. (1995) Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection in nonobstructive azoospermia. HumReprod 10:14571460.

    Emery, M., Senn, A., Wisard, M., Germond, M. (2004) Ejaculationfailure on the day of oocyte retrieval for IVF: Case report. HumReprod 19:20882090.

    Glina, S., Soares, J.B., Antunes, N.Jr, Galuppo, A.G., Paz, L.B., Wonch-ockier, R. (2005) Testicular histopathological diagnosis as a predic-tive factor for retrieving spermatozoa for ICSI in non-obstructiveazoospermic patients. Int Braz J Urol 31:338341.

    Kuleshova, L., Gianaroli, L., Magli, C., Ferraretti, A., Trounson, A.(1999) Birth following vitrification of a small number of humanoocytes: case report. Hum Reprod 14:30773079.

    Kuleshova, L.L., Lopata, A. (2002) Vitrification can be more favour-able than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 78:449454.

    Kyono, K., Fuchinoue, K., Yagi, A., Nakajo, Y., Yamashita, A.,Kumagai, S. (2005) Successful pregnancy and delivery after transferof a single blastocyst derived from a vitrified mature human oocyte.Fertil Steril 84:10151017.

    Lucena, E., Bernal, D.P., Lucena, C., Rojas, A., Moran, A., Lucena, A.(2006) Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes.Fertil Steril 85:108111.

    Lyrakou, S., Mantas, D., Msaouel, P., Baathalah, S., Shrivastav, P.,Chrisostomou, M., et al. (2007) Crossover analysis using immuno-fluorescence detection of MLH1 foci in frozen-thawed testiculartissue. Reprod Biomed Online 15:99105.

    Nagy, Z.P., Chang, C.C., Shapiro, D.B., Bernal, D.P., Kort, H.I., Vajta,G. (2009) The efficacy and safety of human oocyte vitrification.Semin Reprod Med 27:450455.

    Ravizzini, P., Carizza, C., Abdelmassih, V., Abdelmassih, S., Azevedo,M., Abdelmassih, R. (2008) Microdissection testicular sperm ex-traction and IVF-ICSI outcome in nonobstructive azoospermia.Andrologia 40:219226.

    Rienzi, L., Romano, S., Albricci, L., Maggiulli, R., Capalbo, A., Baroni,E., et al. (2010) Embryo development of fresh versus vitrified me-taphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod 25:6673.

    Wu, B., Wong, D., Lu, S., Dickstein, S., Silva, M., Gelety, T.J. (2005)Optimal use of fresh and frozen-thawed testicular sperm for intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection in azoospermic patients. J AssistReprod Genet. 22:389394.

    Yoon, T.K., Kim, T.J., Park, S.E., Hong, S.W., Ko, J.J., Chung, H.M.,et al. (2003) Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulatedin vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril79:13231326.

    Emergency egg vitrification 213

    Copyright 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

    Syst

    Bio

    l Rep

    rod

    Med

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    from

    info

    rmah

    ealth

    care

    .com

    by

    SUN

    Y S

    tate

    Uni

    vers

    ity o

    f N

    ew Y

    ork

    at S

    tony

    Bro

    ok o

    n 10

    /26/

    14Fo

    r pe

    rson

    al u

    se o

    nly.