Upload
alexia-henry
View
225
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cluster policy in Russia: Cluster policy in Russia: on the way to economic diversification?on the way to economic diversification?
Igor V. PilipenkoIgor V. Pilipenko
Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityLomonosov Moscow State UniversityDepartment Geography of the World EconomyDepartment Geography of the World Economy
2008 AAG Annual Meeting2008 AAG Annual MeetingApril 15-19, 2008, Boston, MAApril 15-19, 2008, Boston, MA
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
2
A new way of microeconomic policy implementation A new way of microeconomic policy implementation involving government, business, educational and scientific involving government, business, educational and scientific communitycommunity.. ((discussed by Sdiscussed by Sölvell, Lindqvist, Ketels, 2003; Andersson, Hansson, Serger, Sölvik, 2004)ölvell, Lindqvist, Ketels, 2003; Andersson, Hansson, Serger, Sölvik, 2004)
Clusters are new policy objects – 2 general types of Clusters are new policy objects – 2 general types of clusters:clusters:
• Non-spatial clusters (industrial, national)Non-spatial clusters (industrial, national) – – a group of inter-a group of inter-related, adjacent industries and services that successfully related, adjacent industries and services that successfully specialise in the international division of labour;specialise in the international division of labour;
• Spatial clusters (regional, local, transborder)Spatial clusters (regional, local, transborder) – – groups of groups of geographically concentrated enterprises in regions or geographically concentrated enterprises in regions or localities from adjacent industries and services, which localities from adjacent industries and services, which produce similar or inter-supplemental goods and services produce similar or inter-supplemental goods and services using mostly external economies of scale (local division of using mostly external economies of scale (local division of labour, local pool of labour force, innovation diffusion).labour, local pool of labour force, innovation diffusion).
ССluster policy – definition (I)luster policy – definition (I)
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
3
Cluster policy involves tools from other Cluster policy involves tools from other policies or is a part of other policies at a policies or is a part of other policies at a regionalregional//local level:local level:• tax incentives,tax incentives,• regional branding (Standort-Marketing),regional branding (Standort-Marketing),• FDI attraction, etc.FDI attraction, etc.
Cluster policy genesis: Cluster policy genesis: (discussed by Ffowcs(discussed by Ffowcs--WilliamsWilliams, 2004, 2004)
• Top-down policy (initiated from government);Top-down policy (initiated from government);• Bottom-up policy (started by business community);Bottom-up policy (started by business community);• Mixed policies (both parties initiate cluster policy).Mixed policies (both parties initiate cluster policy).
ССluster policy – definition (II)luster policy – definition (II)
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
4
1.1. Stimulation of competition and exports Stimulation of competition and exports diversification;diversification;
2.2. Fostering studies of firm development at the Fostering studies of firm development at the regionalregional//local level and elaboration of specially local level and elaboration of specially focused programs;focused programs;
3.3. Creation of favorable environment for SMEs Creation of favorable environment for SMEs development;development;
4.4. Strengthening cooperation between government, Strengthening cooperation between government, business, educational and scientific communities.business, educational and scientific communities.
Possible cluster policy targets Possible cluster policy targets in the Russian economy: in the Russian economy:
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
5
no competition – 20%:no competition – 20%:• max – wood processing 31%,max – wood processing 31%,• min – textile manufacturing 12%.min – textile manufacturing 12%.
competition with only domestic enterprises – 30%:competition with only domestic enterprises – 30%:• max – food processing 42%,max – food processing 42%,• min – chemicals 17%.min – chemicals 17%.
competition with only foreign enterprises – 13%:competition with only foreign enterprises – 13%:• max – textile manufacturing 25%,max – textile manufacturing 25%,• min – food processing 5%.min – food processing 5%.
competition with both types of enterprises – 37%: competition with both types of enterprises – 37%: • max – chemicals 53%,max – chemicals 53%,• min – automotive industry 26%.min – automotive industry 26%.
Competition in the Russian economyCompetition in the Russian economyWorld BankWorld Bank//HSE survey 2005HSE survey 2005//2006 2006 ~ 1,000 enterprises~ 1,000 enterprises
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
6
The share of 10 leading export products in total The share of 10 leading export products in total exports (INTRACEN) has increased from 76 to 79% exports (INTRACEN) has increased from 76 to 79% in 2001-2005;in 2001-2005;
The share of “mineral products” group (according The share of “mineral products” group (according to Rosstat’s definition) has increased from 53.8 to to Rosstat’s definition) has increased from 53.8 to 65.9%;65.9%;
The share of “vehicles and its parts” group The share of “vehicles and its parts” group (Rosstat) decreased from 8.8 to 5.8%.(Rosstat) decreased from 8.8 to 5.8%.
Russia’s exports diversificationRussia’s exports diversification
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
7
Regional policies despite Russia’s vast territories have Regional policies despite Russia’s vast territories have been surprisingly considered of second priority after been surprisingly considered of second priority after macroeconomic stability; macroeconomic stability;
Ca. 11 versions of “The Concept of regional Ca. 11 versions of “The Concept of regional development in Russia” were elaborated; the last development in Russia” were elaborated; the last proposed version was approved by the Government in proposed version was approved by the Government in 2005;2005;
The role of regional development topics in the current The role of regional development topics in the current strategic planning: strategic planning: • ““The Concept of Social-Economic Development of the Russian The Concept of Social-Economic Development of the Russian
Economy until 2020” (the version of October 2007) – 15 pages Economy until 2020” (the version of October 2007) – 15 pages about regional development (171 pages in total);about regional development (171 pages in total);
• “The Concept 2020” in March 2008 – 28 pages about regional about regional developmentdevelopment from 165 pages in total).
Microeconomic approach Microeconomic approach and regional development (I) and regional development (I)
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
8
Microeconomic approach Microeconomic approach and regional development (II) and regional development (II)
Overall productivity in Federal districts, 2000 and 2004
4135
3298
3442
3534
2914
2826
2010
15524
9055
7905
7884
7538
6873
5996
4438
5856
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Ural FD
Central FD
North-Western FD
Russia, average
Far-Eastern FD
Siberian FD
Volga FD
Southern FD
Overall productivity, GDP per person employed
2000 2004
The productivity difference between Ural FD and Southern FD: The productivity difference between Ural FD and Southern FD: 2000 – 2.9 times; 2004 – 3.5 times.2000 – 2.9 times; 2004 – 3.5 times.
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
9
The range between regions with highest and lowest The range between regions with highest and lowest overall productivity (GDP per person employed)overall productivity (GDP per person employed)::
2000200020042004
Nenets AONenets AO 21,48521,485 Nenets AONenets AO 56,01256,012Rep. DagestanRep. Dagestan 925925 Rep. AdygeyaRep. Adygeya 3,1023,102
Range (times)Range (times) 2323 Range (times)Range (times) 1818
The range between 10 regions with highest and lowest The range between 10 regions with highest and lowest overall productivityoverall productivity (GDP per person employed)(GDP per person employed)::
2000200020042004
10 leading regions10 leading regions 10,44510,445 10 leading regions 10 leading regions 26,57726,57710 lagging regions10 lagging regions 13111311 10 lagging regions 10 lagging regions 3,2663,266Range (times)Range (times) 7.97.9 Range (times) Range (times) 8.18.1
Microeconomic approach Microeconomic approach and regional development (III) and regional development (III)
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
10
Microeconomic approach Microeconomic approach and regional development (IV) and regional development (IV)
Regional productivity distribution, 2004
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
regions
GD
P p
er p
erso
n em
ploy
ed
884,7X
375,5Me
012,56ADNenets
554,52 ADMansiKhanty
377,42 ADNenetsYamal
519,36'' oblastTyumen
327,16Moscow
730,7. PetersburgSt
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
11
SMEs definition in RussiaSMEs definition in Russia Prior to 2007 no definition of SMEs in statistics;Prior to 2007 no definition of SMEs in statistics;
Since 1995 - definition of small enterprises:Since 1995 - definition of small enterprises: No. of employees varied between 30 and 100 depending on No. of employees varied between 30 and 100 depending on
industry,industry, GovernmentGovernment//religious organizations’ share < 25%religious organizations’ share < 25% Self-employment is included.Self-employment is included.
Since January 1, 2008 – definition of SMEs:Since January 1, 2008 – definition of SMEs: Medium-sized – less than 250 employees,Medium-sized – less than 250 employees, Small – less than 100 employees,Small – less than 100 employees, Micro-enterprises – less than 10 employees.Micro-enterprises – less than 10 employees. Self-employment is included.Self-employment is included.
In 1980 in USSR an average employment in manufacturing was In 1980 in USSR an average employment in manufacturing was ca. 330 employees (Baklanov, 1986).ca. 330 employees (Baklanov, 1986).
In 2005 in Russia an average employment in the whole In 2005 in Russia an average employment in the whole economy was less than 15 employees (Rosstat).economy was less than 15 employees (Rosstat).
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
12
Small business (SB) demography in RussiaSmall business (SB) demography in Russia SB share in: SB share in: employment – 17.8% (2006); employment – 17.8% (2006);
national value-added – 11.8% (2004).national value-added – 11.8% (2004). SB distribution by industry, as of January 1, 2007:SB distribution by industry, as of January 1, 2007:
Source: Source: Ministry of Ministry of Economic Economic Development Development and Tradeand Trade
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
13
Implementation of a regional innovative policyA region
The model of spatial interaction between The model of spatial interaction between government, SMEs, large enterprises, education government, SMEs, large enterprises, education
and scientific institutions within a regional and scientific institutions within a regional innovation systeminnovation system
Creation of knowledge in educational and
scientific institutions
Implementation of innovations in
technology, science parks, etc.
Innovative production in clusters of
small and medium enterprisers
A transnational corporation
A transnational corporation
Value-added chain
innovations goods
Influence of TNCs
Influence of TNCs
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
14
Notions “cluster” and “cluster policy” are Notions “cluster” and “cluster policy” are often incorrectly interpreted;often incorrectly interpreted;
No final goals settings (i.e. raising No final goals settings (i.e. raising productivity, exports, creation of new jobs);productivity, exports, creation of new jobs);
No drivers of SMEs competitiveness No drivers of SMEs competitiveness identified (external economies of scale, etc.); identified (external economies of scale, etc.);
Confusion of notions – Confusion of notions – cluster vs. territorial-production complex (often cluster vs. territorial-production complex (often
in regional development strategies);in regional development strategies);cluster vs. technology park or industrial cluster vs. technology park or industrial
districts;districts;
ChallengesChallenges for cluster policy for cluster policy implementation in Russiaimplementation in Russia
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
15
Development of the theory of Development of the theory of territorial-production complexes (TPCs)territorial-production complexes (TPCs)
1920s – Creation of theory of economic region1920s – Creation of theory of economic region
economic region = TPCeconomic region = TPC 1950s – Creation theory of energy-production cycles 1950s – Creation theory of energy-production cycles
as basis of TPCsas basis of TPCs
1970s-1980s – Paradigm “Shift to East”, practical 1970s-1980s – Paradigm “Shift to East”, practical spatial application of TPC models in Eastern regions spatial application of TPC models in Eastern regions of USSRof USSR
Late 1970s-1980s – Application of TPC models in Late 1970s-1980s – Application of TPC models in developing nations and countries of Central and developing nations and countries of Central and Eastern EuropeEastern Europe
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
16
Main territorial-production complexes in Main territorial-production complexes in Russia, since 1980sRussia, since 1980s
North-Tyumen’
Noril’sk
West-Yakut
South-Yakut
Middle-Ob’
Bratsk-Ust’-Ilimsk
Irkutsk-Cheremkhovo
KrasnoyarskSayany
Kuzbass
Lower Angara
Timan-Pechora
Kursk MagneticAnomaly
10 Siberian TPCs accounted in 2006 for 17% in country’s manufacturing and 25% in national exports
(Bezrukov, 2006)
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
17
The classification of spatial forms of The classification of spatial forms of R&D and production organizationR&D and production organization
Prevailed size of enterprises
Type of creation
Small and medium enterprises
I b
Small, medium, and large
enterprisesII b
Medium and large
enterprisesIII b
Large enterprises
IV b
Developed themselves / localization economies
I a
- Marshallian industrial district- Italian industrial district- Regional cluster- Local cluster
- Hub-and-spoke industrial district- State-anchored industrial district- Regional cluster
- Satellite platform district
- Vertically integrated industrial plants (often in old industrial regions)
Created artificially by state
authorities
II a
- Technology park- Science park- Business innovation centre- Innovation technological centre
- Technopolis- Territorial-production complex
- Territorial-production complex
- Territorial-production complex
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
18
Four directions of cluster policy Four directions of cluster policy towards four various objects:towards four various objects:
Non-spatial clusters – already exist and can be easily Non-spatial clusters – already exist and can be easily identified: oil&gas industries, metallurgy, military complex, identified: oil&gas industries, metallurgy, military complex, aerospace industry;aerospace industry;
Territorial-production complexesTerritorial-production complexes – – already exist (the plants already exist (the plants are mostly private-owned) or were planned in USSR;are mostly private-owned) or were planned in USSR;
Spatial clusters – possible emerging within agglomerations Spatial clusters – possible emerging within agglomerations with scientific and basic infrastructure in new industries with scientific and basic infrastructure in new industries developing since 1991 with a larger share of SMEs – ICT, developing since 1991 with a larger share of SMEs – ICT, services, new construction materials, consumer-oriented services, new construction materials, consumer-oriented industries;industries;
Cluster initiatives – some examples. i.e. in automotive Cluster initiatives – some examples. i.e. in automotive industry are found.industry are found.
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
19
Cluster policy direction 1:Cluster policy direction 1:non-spatial clustersnon-spatial clusters
Responsibility: federal government;Responsibility: federal government;
Type of policy: creation of a favorable and Type of policy: creation of a favorable and innovation-stimulative framework, promotion of innovation-stimulative framework, promotion of cluster companies abroad; raising educational cluster companies abroad; raising educational and technological standards;and technological standards;
Form of realization: mostly lawmaking;Form of realization: mostly lawmaking;
Theoretical background: the schools of the Theoretical background: the schools of the competitiveness theory.competitiveness theory.
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
20
The analysis of the competitiveness The analysis of the competitiveness theory creationtheory creation
The problem of national competitiveness
The theory of international trade
The location theory
We analyzed ca. 40 theories and concepts We analyzed ca. 40 theories and concepts elaborated by scholars from 10 nationselaborated by scholars from 10 nations
The human capital theory
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
21
We identify three main schools of the We identify three main schools of the competitiveness theorycompetitiveness theory::
1.1. The American The American School School –– M. Porter, M. Enright, et.al. M. Porter, M. Enright, et.al.The most practically-oriented school: the diamond of competitive The most practically-oriented school: the diamond of competitive
advantagesadvantages,, industrial and regional clusters industrial and regional clusters
3.3. The Scandinavian School The Scandinavian School - - BB.-.-AA. . LundvallLundvall, , BB. . JohnsonJohnson, , BB. . AsheimAsheim, , AA. . IsaksenIsaksen, , EE. . ReinertReinert et.al.et.al.
The social-economic school: national systems of innovationThe social-economic school: national systems of innovation,, regional innovation systems, the learning economy, learning regional innovation systems, the learning economy, learning
regionregion,, types of knowledge types of knowledge
2.2. The British School The British School - - JJ. . DunningDunning, , RR. . KaplinskyKaplinsky, , JJ. . HumphreyHumphrey, , H. SchmitzH. Schmitz, , CC. . FreemanFreeman et.al.et.al.
Division of labour between developed and developing Division of labour between developed and developing countries: value-added chainscountries: value-added chains, , clustersclusters, , transnational transnational
corporations, techno-economic paradigmcorporations, techno-economic paradigm
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
22
First steps in cluster policy realization First steps in cluster policy realization towards non-spatial clusterstowards non-spatial clusters
Creation of large government-owned enterprises in Creation of large government-owned enterprises in highly monopolized industries in the world economy: highly monopolized industries in the world economy: ““OAO United Aircraft Corporation” (11 enterprises) OAO United Aircraft Corporation” (11 enterprises)
in 2006; in 2006; ““OAO United Shipbuilding Corporation” in 2007;OAO United Shipbuilding Corporation” in 2007;
Creation of State Corporations (as legal entities – Creation of State Corporations (as legal entities – nonprofit organizations) in 2007:nonprofit organizations) in 2007: Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies;Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies; Russian Technologies;Russian Technologies; ROSATOM;ROSATOM; etc.etc.
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
23
Cluster policy direction 2:Cluster policy direction 2:territorial-production complexesterritorial-production complexes
Responsibility: Responsibility: federal government – strategic planning;federal government – strategic planning; regional government – project realization. regional government – project realization.
Type of policy: creation of new TPCs, Type of policy: creation of new TPCs, diversification of already existed TPC, realization diversification of already existed TPC, realization of infrastructure projects;of infrastructure projects;
Form of realization: mostly public-private Form of realization: mostly public-private partnership;partnership;
Theoretical background: TPC-approach.Theoretical background: TPC-approach.
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
24
Cluster policy direction 3:Cluster policy direction 3: spatial clusters spatial clusters
Responsibility depending on cluster size: Responsibility depending on cluster size: regional government;regional government; local government.local government.
Type of policy: creation of firm networks, broker Type of policy: creation of firm networks, broker policy, regional branding, educational and policy, regional branding, educational and training programs, diversification of demand, training programs, diversification of demand, creation of favorable conditions;creation of favorable conditions;
Form of realization: public-private partnership, Form of realization: public-private partnership, lawmaking, promotion of cluster companies lawmaking, promotion of cluster companies abroad, exhibitions;abroad, exhibitions;
Theoretical background: the schools of the Theoretical background: the schools of the competitiveness theory.competitiveness theory.
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
25
Location of NovosibirskLocation of Novosibirsk
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
26
Local ICT-cluster in NovosibirskLocal ICT-cluster in Novosibirsk
Year of formationYear of formation – 1992 – 1992
Number of firmsNumber of firms – – overover 20 20 from total from total 150 150 enterprisesenterprises
Number of employeesNumber of employees – – ca.ca. 2 2,000,000
Turnover of cluster firmsTurnover of cluster firms – – overover $$30 30 mlnmln (2003) (2003)
SpecializationSpecialization – – offshore programmingoffshore programming, , software productionsoftware production, , consulting consulting and OEMand OEM
In largerIn larger scientific centres asscientific centres as
MoscowMoscow ( (overover 70 70 ICTICT--enterprisesenterprises) ) andand St.-PetersburgSt.-Petersburg ( (overover 50 50 ICTICT--enterprisesenterprises) ) – also potential ICT-clusters – also potential ICT-clusters
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
27
Main characteristics of a local cluster Main characteristics of a local cluster in Novosibirsk in Novosibirsk::
• Cluster firms: Cluster firms: – are from one industry;are from one industry;– are geographically concentrated;are geographically concentrated;– have close contacts with research institutes from the have close contacts with research institutes from the
Scientific city of Novosibirsk (Naukograd);Scientific city of Novosibirsk (Naukograd);– have close contacts with Novosibirsk State University;have close contacts with Novosibirsk State University;– have close contacts with Novosibirsk Technology Park.have close contacts with Novosibirsk Technology Park.
• Intensive information and know-how exchange Intensive information and know-how exchange between firms and their personnel;between firms and their personnel;
• Decision-making centre was in this cluster – the Decision-making centre was in this cluster – the leading firm “Novosoft”.leading firm “Novosoft”.
April 16, 2008 Igor V. Pilipenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
28
Cluster policy direction 4:Cluster policy direction 4:cluster initiativescluster initiatives
Responsibility: mainly local governments;Responsibility: mainly local governments;
Type of policy: creation of firm networks, Type of policy: creation of firm networks, deepening cooperation between government, deepening cooperation between government, enterprises and academia, broker policy, regional enterprises and academia, broker policy, regional branding, educational programs, diversification branding, educational programs, diversification of demand, creation of favorable conditions;of demand, creation of favorable conditions;
Form of realization: public-private partnership, Form of realization: public-private partnership, promotion of cluster companies abroad, promotion of cluster companies abroad, exhibitions;exhibitions;
Theoretical background: the schools of the Theoretical background: the schools of the competitiveness theory.competitiveness theory.
Thank youThank you!!
Igor V. PilipenkoIgor V. Pilipenko
Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityLomonosov Moscow State UniversityDepartment Geography of the World EconomyDepartment Geography of the World Economy