2
CMAJ DECEMBER 8, 2009 • 181(12) © 2009 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors E295 M any doctors like to write about their experiences in medicine, myself included. In part, this is because peo- ple often write about what they know best, or in the case of physicians, the only thing they know anything about at all (medicine) and the only people they really care about even slightly (them- selves). Physicians may also have an uncon- scious motive for writing, such as the desire to be paid a few hundred dollars extra to get a spiffy new pair of shoes or an hour at the spa. Actually, that may be a conscious motive, as my analyst pointed out to me last week when I was telling him about this article I was writing. I started seeing Dr. Janus because Hollywood led me to believe it would be a cool thing to do. So far, it has been disappointing. “Come now, Lara,” he said patiently, “I refuse to believe that your cre- ative impetus derives solely from a shallow materi- alism investing your ego impulses in retrogressive, compensatory gratification. When I read some of your articles, I sense a thinly veiled hostility directed toward colleagues, who invariably embody the manifest stereotypical characteristics of their specialties, and I wonder if what we are seeing is an act of aggression, an effort to preserve narcissistic mastery in the face of vestigial sibling rivalry and subsumed oedipal conflict.” I looked up at the ceiling (which has the most appallingly tacky light fixture I have seen outside a reality TV show) and reflected that the lady ana- lyst on the Sopranos was really much nicer than Dr. Janus, not to mention a whole lot easier to understand. Nonetheless, he did get me thinking about the possible motivations one might have, besides money, for writing about colleagues. These include: 1. Flattery. If properly done, writing really nice things about colleagues can get you free drinks at the department holi- day party. 2. Seduction. Writing really, really nice things will get you those drinks in someone else’s apartment after the holiday party wraps up. Or so I’m told. 3. Self-aggrandizement. I was going to say that this is only a problem if the physician–writer is a surgeon, but then I recalled something Dr. Janus said about manifest stereo- typical bodies, so perhaps I’ll let it pass. 4. Revenge. This is probably the number one reason docs will write about colleagues. Of course, nobody ever admits this is why they wrote that moving essay about the patient who was dying in the intensive care unit, the one who was treated so rudely by the attending physician and then tenderly ministered to by a particularly sensitive and insightful clinical clerk who was the only person that truly connected with the patient. They will tell you the motiva- tion in writing the piece was to privilege the voice of the (composite) patient, not to stick it to the insensitive bas- tard who made life a Technicolor version of hell for the six weeks they were stuck on his service. Speaking hypo- thetically here. Given these diverse motivations, here are some simple guidelines I would like to propose as someone who has spent DOI:10.1503/cmaj.091878 Essay Writing about colleagues CMAJ Holiday Review © 2009 Jupiterimages Corp.

CMAJ Holiday Revie · I started seeing Dr. Janus because Hollywood ... “I refuse to believe that your cre-ative impetus derives solely from a shallow materi-alism investing your

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CMAJ • DECEMBER 8, 2009 • 181(12)© 2009 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

E295

Many doctors like to write about theirexperiences in medicine, myselfincluded. In part, this is because peo-

ple often write about what they know best, or inthe case of physicians, the only thing they knowanything about at all (medicine) and the onlypeople they really care about even slightly (them-selves). Physicians may also have an uncon-scious motive for writing, such as the desire to bepaid a few hundred dollars extra to get a spiffynew pair of shoes or an hour at the spa. Actually,that may be a conscious motive, as my analystpointed out to me last week when I was tellinghim about this article I was writing.

I started seeing Dr. Janus because Hollywoodled me to believe it would be a cool thing to do. Sofar, it has been disappointing. “Come now, Lara,”he said patiently, “I refuse to believe that your cre-ative impetus derives solely from a shallow materi-alism investing your ego impulses in retrogressive,compensatory gratification. When I read some ofyour articles, I sense a thinly veiled hostilitydirected toward colleagues, who invariably embodythe manifest stereotypical characteristics of theirspecialties, and I wonder if what we are seeing is anact of aggression, an effort to preserve narcissisticmastery in the face of vestigial sibling rivalry andsubsumed oedipal conflict.”

I looked up at the ceiling (which has the mostappallingly tacky light fixture I have seen outsidea reality TV show) and reflected that the lady ana-lyst on the Sopranos was really much nicer than Dr. Janus,not to mention a whole lot easier to understand.

Nonetheless, he did get me thinking about the possiblemotivations one might have, besides money, for writing aboutcolleagues. These include:1. Flattery. If properly done, writing really nice things about

colleagues can get you free drinks at the department holi-day party.

2. Seduction. Writing really, really nice things will get youthose drinks in someone else’s apartment after the holidayparty wraps up. Or so I’m told.

3. Self-aggrandizement. I was going to say that this is only aproblem if the physician–writer is a surgeon, but then Irecalled something Dr. Janus said about manifest stereo-typical bodies, so perhaps I’ll let it pass.

4. Revenge. This is probably the number one reason docswill write about colleagues. Of course, nobody everadmits this is why they wrote that moving essay about thepatient who was dying in the intensive care unit, the onewho was treated so rudely by the attending physician andthen tenderly ministered to by a particularly sensitive andinsightful clinical clerk who was the only person that trulyconnected with the patient. They will tell you the motiva-tion in writing the piece was to privilege the voice of the(composite) patient, not to stick it to the insensitive bas-tard who made life a Technicolor version of hell for thesix weeks they were stuck on his service. Speaking hypo-thetically here.Given these diverse motivations, here are some simple

guidelines I would like to propose as someone who has spentDO

I:10

.150

3/cm

aj.0

9187

8

Essay

Writing about colleagues

CMAJ Holiday Review

© 2

009

Jup

iter

imag

es C

orp

.

at least 30 minutes or so thinking about the subject with ananalyst who, regrettably, looks nothing like Richard Gere inFinal Analysis. Not that I went into analysis thinking hewould, of course.1. Don’t write about real people, or if you do, combine three

or four real people together to create a composite charac-ter. Like Dr. Janus except nice, like the Sopranos lady, andbetter looking.

2. Don’t assume that just because you never bother to readanything in your field, nobody else does either. It’s amaz-ing how many people read journals and medical trade pub-lications, especially the issue where you admit to having acrush on your immediate supervisor.

3. Don’t write nasty things about colleagues who also write

about colleagues on a regular basis. I once got into a pro-longed battle with... Wait, scratch that.Other authors will likely wish to further elucidate these

points and add more, which I would encourage because itmeans they’ll cite me, which is kind of cool when it (rarely)happens. If any of these authors wish to contact me, I wouldurge them to do so. I love collaborating with new colleagues,and who knows, perhaps they’ll find themselves in print someday as a particularly charming facet of Dr. Janus’s personal-ity. If so, I hope I get invited over for a lime daiquiri.

Lara Hazelton MDPsychiatristHalifax, NS

CMAJ • DECEMBER 8, 2009 • 181(12)E296

Holiday Review