CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    1/8

    Effects of variable viscosity and thermal conductivityon free convective heat and mass transfer

    flow with constant heat flux througha porous medium

    UTPAL SARMA andDr. G.C.HAZARIKA

    Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh (India)

    ABSTRACT

    The MHD flow has been subjected to a porous vertical

    plate with Hall current and constant heat flux. A uniform magnetic

    field also applied which makes an anglewith the plane transverseto the plate. A similarity parameter has been introduced andthe suction velocity is inversely proportional to this time dependent

    parameter. The non-linear partial differential equations are

    transformed in to ordinary differential equations with the help of

    similarity substitutions. Finally the equations are solved by applying

    Runga-Kutta shooting algorithm. The effects of various parameters

    i.e. viscosity parameter, thermal conductivity parameter and mass

    transfer parameter are displayed graphically.

    Key words: Variable viscosity, thermal conductivity, Hall

    current, constant heat flux.

    AMS N0.Fluid Mechanics-76D10

    J . Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol. 1(2), 163-170 (2010).

    INTRODUCTION

    The hydrodynamic flow of a

    viscous incompressible fluid past an

    impulsively started infinite horizontal

    plate was studied by Stokes15, and

    because of its practical importance this

    problem was extended to bodies of

    different shapes by various authors.

    Soundalgekar1studied free convection

    effects on the stokes problem for an

    infinite vertical plate, when it is cooled

    or heated by the free convection

    currents. Many of the researchers

    studied the effects of heat and mass

    transfer on magneto hydrodynamics

    (MHD) free convection flow: some of

    them are Raptis and Kafoussias2,

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    2/8

    164 Utpal Sarma et al., J .Comp.&Math.Sci. Vol.1(2), 163-170 (2010).

    Rahman and Sattar3, Yih4, In the above

    stated papers, the diffusion-thermo

    term and thermal-diffusion term were

    neglected from the energy and

    concentration equations respectively.

    Kafoussias and Williams7studied thermal-

    diffusion and diffusion-thermo effectson mixed free-forced convective and

    mass transfer boundary layer flow with

    temperature dependent viscosity.

    Recently, Takhar et al.8studied unsteady

    free convection flow over an Infinite

    porous plate due to the combined effects

    of thermal and mass diffusion, magnetic

    field and Hall currents. Very recently,

    Postelnicu9 studied numerically the

    influence of a magnetic field on heat

    and mass transfer by natural convec-tion from vertical surfaces in porous

    media considering Soret and Dufour

    effects. In the light of the applications

    of the flows arising from differences

    in concentration in geophysics, aero-

    nautics and engineering many researchers

    studied the effects of magnetohy-

    drodynamics (MHD) free convection

    flow : some of them are Aboeldahab

    and Elbarbary12, Megahead et al.13.

    Sattar and Hussain5

    studied the effectsof mass transfer as well as the effects

    of Hall currents on an unsteady MHD

    free convection flow past an accelerated

    porous plate with time dependent

    temperature and concentration. Sattar

    and Alam6have also studied the effects

    of heat and mass transfer as well as

    the effects of Hall current on the

    unsteady MHD free convection flow

    past an accelerated porous plate with

    tie dependent temperature and con-

    centration through a porous medium.

    Following the works of Sattar

    and Alam6 our aim is to study the

    effects of variable viscosity and thermal

    conductivity on various parameters likevelocity, temperature and mass transfer

    on free convective heat and mass

    transfer flow through a porous medium

    with Hall current and constant heat

    flux. The aim of the present paper is to

    study the effects of variable viscosity

    and thermal conductivity on free

    convective heat and mass transfer flow

    and Lai and Kulacki14 probably

    presented the expression for these two

    terms.

    Mathematical Analysis

    We consider an electrically

    conducting viscous incompressible

    fluid through a porous medium along

    an infinite vertical porous plate (y= 0)

    with the effects of Hall current. The

    flow is also assumed to be in the

    x- direction which is taken along the

    plate in the upward direction and y-axis is normal to it. At time t > 0, the

    temperature and the species concen-

    tration at the plate are raised to Twand Cw, Tand Cbeing the temperature

    and species concentration of the

    uniform flow, and thereafter maintained

    constant. Following Ram8, a strong

    magnetic field B is imposed in a

    direction that makes an angle withthe plane transverse to the plate

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    3/8

    Utpal Sarma et al., J .Comp.&Math.Sci. Vol.1(2), 163-170 (2010). 165

    which is assumed to be electrically

    non-conducting, such that B= (0,B0,(1-2)B0) where = cos . Thus if= 1 the imposed magnetic f ield isparallel to the y-axis and if = o themagnetic field is parallel to the plate.

    The magnetic Reynolds number of theflow is taken to be small enough so that

    the induced magnetic field is negligible

    compared to the applied magnetic field

    and the magnetic lines of force are

    fixed relative to the fluid, Shercliff10.

    The plate is assumed to be non-con-

    ducting hence J y= 0 at the plate and

    hence zero everywhere. We have from

    Ohms law neglecting electron pressure

    and ion slip :

    ),(1 22

    0

    wumm

    BpJ ex

    )(1

    J22

    0z mu

    m

    Bpe

    w here, m=ee is the Hall parameter.

    It is assumed that the plate isinfinite in extent and hence all physicalquantities depend on y and t. Thus in

    accordance with the above assump-tions and Boussinesq's approximation,the governing equations of theproblem are :

    )(t

    u02

    2

    TTgy

    u

    yy

    u

    y

    uv

    )()1(

    )(*22

    022

    0

    mum

    Bp

    k

    uCCg

    e

    (1)

    0y

    (2)

    t

    w2

    2

    yy

    w

    y

    w

    y

    wv

    )()1( 22

    0

    22

    wm

    mBp e

    (3)

    1

    t

    T2

    2

    yy

    T

    Cy

    T

    C

    k

    y

    Tv

    pp

    22

    y

    w

    y

    u

    Cp

    (4)

    1

    t

    C2

    2

    yy

    C

    Scy

    C

    Scy

    Cv

    (5)

    With the boundary conditions

    yas,CC,TT0, w0,u

    0ya t,CcC,0, w0,uw

    k

    q

    y

    T

    (6)

    A simlarity parameter is introduced in

    order to make the equations (1) to (5)similar as follows

    = (t) (7)

    Where,is in fact a time dependent length

    scale so that the governing equations

    could be transformed in to a similar

    form in time. Using this length scale the

    solution of Equation (2) is considered

    to be

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    4/8

    -vv 0

    (8)

    Where v0is the suction parameter

    Now, we introduce the following non-

    dimensiona 1 quantities

    U

    w

    )g(,U

    u

    )f(,

    y

    00 (9)

    C

    C-C)(,

    )()(

    w

    w

    Cq

    TT

    (10)

    WhereU0 is a constant velocity.

    Viscosity and thermal conductivity of

    fluid are inverse linear functions of

    emperature14, so

    ) ](1[k

    1k)],(1[

    111 TTTT

    -k,r

    r

    c

    c k

    (11)

    Introducing equations (7) to (10) in

    equations (1), (3), (4) and (5), we have

    the following non-dimensional equa-

    tions

    0

    ffvdt

    df

    c

    c

    c

    c

    GcGrf

    c

    c

    c

    c

    c

    )(1 22

    mgf

    mMf

    (12)

    0

    ggvdt

    dg

    cc

    c

    c

    c

    )(

    122

    mgf

    mMff

    (13)

    0

    cc

    c Scvdt

    dSc

    (14)

    Where

    ,g

    Gr0

    30

    kvU

    q

    ,,)(g

    Gc2

    0

    2*0

    kvU

    CCq w

    ,Pr,p

    M22

    0

    2

    e

    k

    vC

    v

    B p

    Sc,v

    UEc

    2

    0

    D

    The corresponding boundary conditions

    are

    0at-11,0,g,0 f (15)

    as00,0,g0,f (16)

    The similarity condition require that

    2dt

    d

    (17)

    f o l l ow ing the wo rks o f Sa t ta r and

    Hussain.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    The velocity profiles for x andz components of velocity commonlyknown as primary and the secondaryare shown for different values ofviscosity parameter, thermal conductivityparameter and the mass transferparameter.

    In fig. 1 the primary velocity ispresented for the viscosity parameterc= -1,-3, 9 and -20. The value of the

    166 Utpal Sarma et al., J .Comp.&Math.Sci. Vol.1(2), 163-170 (2010).

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    5/8

    Grashof number Gr=0.1, modifiedGrashof number Gc=0.1, = 0.1 andmagnetic Reynolds number M= 0.3 hasbeen taken. On substitution of thesevarious values of the parameter it isobserved that the fluid velocity incre-

    ases with the increase of viscosityparameter c. Infig. 2 the secondaryvelocity profile is presented for viscosityparameter c=-0.2,-0.5,-1,-2.6. Thevalues of =0.1 Hall parameter m=0.1has been taken. Here it is also observedthat the secondary velocity profile ofthe fluid increases with the decreaseof the viscosity parameter c. In fig. 3the temperature profile of the fluid ispresented for the thermal conductivityparameter r = -1.1,-2.2,-4.4,-10,

    Pr=0.7Ec=0.1 andc= -10.The obser-vations under boundary conditionsshow that he fluid temperature decreaseswith the increase of the thermalconductivity parameter r. In the forthfigure it is observed the effect of Prandtlnumber Pr on the temperature profile.Substituting values for Pr=3.8, 4.9,6.6, 9.9 and m= 0.6, M= 2, c = -10we observe that the temperatureprofile asymptotically approaches theX-axis and the profile increases whilethe Prandtl number decreases. In fig. 5the fluid concentration is presented forviscosity parameter c= -1,-2,-3,-4and -10, Sc= 1and = 0.1. On sub-stitutions of various values of the para-meters it is observed that the concen-tration profile of the fluid decreasesas the mass transfer parameter increase.In the fig. 6 the concentration profilehas been observed for the changingvalues of the variable viscosity parameter

    c. This has shown that the concen-tration profile decreases for increasingvalues of the viscosity parameter cwhen we introduce various values ofthe parameters like Pr=.73, r = -10,M= 2, m=.1, E= 5, = 0.5. In the 7th

    fig. the concentration profile for variousvalues of the mass transfer parameterSc has been observed. We introducedifferent values of the parameters liker =-10, c=-10,m=.2, M=3, E=1,Pr= .73. The observations underboundary conditions show that theconcentration profile decreases withthe increase of the mass transfer para-meter Sc= 1, 2, 4, 10 and asymp-totically approaches to the X-axis. Inthe fig. 8 the observations has been

    made for the primary velocity profilewith the variations of the thermalconductivity parameter r. And it isobserved that for the values of c=-10,m=.1,M= 3,Pr= .73, = 0.1 andr = -1,-3,-20 the velocity profiledecreases for the increasing value ofthe thermal conductivity parameter r.

    In the fig. nine we observe theeffects of the thermal conductivityparameter r on the velocity profile.Substituting the values of r=-1,-3,-6,-20; c=-10, m=.1, M=.1, E=1,Pr= .73 it was found that the velocityprofile decreases with the increase ofthe thermal conductivity parameter r.

    From the above analysis we mayconclude that for accurate results on Heatand mass transfer problem of MHDfree convective flow through a porousmedium along a porous medium along

    Utpal Sarma et al., J .Comp.&Math.Sci. Vol.1(2), 163-170 (2010). 167

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    6/8

    a porous vertical plate with Hall currentand constant heat flux the effects ofvariable viscosity and thermal conduc-tivity must be taken in to account.

    168 Utpal Sarma et al., J .Comp.&Math.Sci. Vol.1(2), 163-170 (2010).

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    7/8

    REFERENCES

    1. Soundalgekar, V.M., Free Convection

    Effects on the Stokes Problem foran Infinite Vertical Plate, ASME J .

    Heat Transfer Vol. 99,pp.499-501,

    (1911).

    2. Raptis, A. and Kafoussias, N. G.,

    Magnetohydrodynamic Free Con-

    vection Flow and Mass Transfer

    Through Porous Medium Bounded

    by an Infinite Vertical Porous Plate

    with Constant Heat Flux, Can. J .

    Phys., Vol. 60, pp. 1725 - 1729,

    (1982).3. Rahman, M. M. and Sattar, M. A.,

    MHD Free Convection and Mass

    Transfer Flow with Oscillatory Plate

    Velocity and Constant Heat Source

    in a Rotating Frame of Reference,

    Dhaka Univ. J . Sci., Vol.a9(1), pp.

    63-73 (1999).

    4. Yih, K. A., Free Convection Effect

    on MHD Coupled Heat and Mass

    Transfer of a moving Permeable

    Utpal Sarmaet al., J .Comp.&Math.Sci. Vol.1(2), 163-170 (2010). 169

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)

  • 8/10/2019 CMJV01I02P0163.pdf

    8/8

    Vertical Surface, Int. Comm. Heat

    Mass Transfer, Vol. 26, pp.95-104.

    (1999).

    5. 17] Sattar M.A. and Hossain M.M.

    Unsteady Hydromagnetic Free

    Convection Flow with Hall Current

    and Mass Transfer Along an Acce-lerated Porous Plate with Time

    Dependent Temperatrure and Con-

    centrationC, an. J . Phys., Vol. 70,

    pp. 369-374 (1992).

    6. Sattar, M. A., Rahman M. M. and

    Alam, M.M., Free Convection Flow

    and Heat Transfer Through a Porous

    Vertical Flat Plate Immersed n a

    Porous Medium with Variable Suction,

    J . Energy Heat and Mass Transfer,

    Yol. 22,pp.17-21 (2000).7. Kafoussias, N. G. and Willaiams,

    E.W., Thermal-diffusion and Diffu-

    sion-thermo Effects on Mixed Free

    Forced Convective and Mass Transfer

    Boundary Layer Flow with Tempe-

    rature Dependent viscosity, Int. J .

    Engng, Sci., Vol. 33,pp. 1369-

    1384 (1995).

    8. Anghel, M., Takhar, H. S. and Pop,

    I., Dufour and Soret Effects on

    Free convection Boundary LayerOver a Vertical Surface Embedded

    in a Porous Medium, Studia Univer-

    sitatis Babes-Bolyai, Mathematica

    Vol. XLV, pp.ll-21 (2000).

    9. Postelnicu, A., Influence of a Mag-

    netic Field on Heat and Mass

    Transfer by Natural Convection

    from Vertical Surfaces in porous

    Media Considering Soret and

    Dufour Effects, Int. J . Heat Mass

    Transfer, Yol.47, pp. 1467-1472,

    (2004).

    10. Shercliff, J .A., A textbook of mag-neto hydrodynamics, pergamon

    press Inc.,New York (1965).

    11. Schlichting, H., Boundary layer

    theory, Mc. Graw Hill Book Co. Inc.

    New York. (1968).

    12. Aboeldahab, E. M. and Elbarbary,

    E. M. E., Hall Current Effect on

    Magnetohydrodynamic Free Con-

    vection Flow Past Asemi-infinite

    Vertical Plate with Mass Transfer,

    Int. J . Engng. Sci., Vol. 39, pp.1641-1652 (2001).

    13. Megahead, A. A., Komy, S. R. and

    Afify, A. A., Similarity Analysis in

    Magnetohydrodynamics Hall Effects

    on Free Convection Flow and Mass

    Transfer Past a Semi-infinite Vertical

    Flat Plate, Iner. J our. Non-linear

    Mecha., Vol.38,pp. 513-520 (2003).

    14. Lai, F.C., Kulacki F.A., Int. J . Heat

    and Mass Transfer, Vol. 33,pp 1028-

    1032 (1990).15. Stokes, G. G., On the Effects of

    the Internal Friction of Fluids on

    the Motion of Pendulum. Trans.

    Combr. Phil. Soc., Vol. 9, pp.8-106,

    1 856.

    170 Utpal Sarma et al., J .Comp.&Math.Sci. Vol.1(2), 163-170 (2010).

    J ournal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 1 Issue 2, 31 March, 2010 Pages (103-273)