CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCTAdopted by the Mississippi Supreme Court

April 4, 2002

Table of Rules

PREAMBLE

TERMINOLOGY

CANON 1 – A Judge Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary.

CANON 2 – A Judge Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Improprietyin All Activities.

CANON 3 – A Judge Shall Perform the Duties of Judicial Office Impartially andDiligently.

CANON 4 – A Judge Shall So Conduct the Judge’s Extra-Judicial Activities as toMinimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Obligations.

CANON 5 – A Judge or Judicial Candidate Shall Refrain From InappropriatePolitical Activity.

APPLICATION OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT.

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCTAdopted by the Mississippi Supreme Court

April 4, 2002

PREAMBLE

Our legal system is based on the principle that an independent, fair and competentjudiciary will interpret and apply the laws that govern us. The role of the judiciary iscentral to American concepts of justice and the rule of law. Intrinsic to all sections of thisCode are the precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honorthe judicial office as a public trust and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in ourlegal system. The judge is an arbiter of facts and law for the resolution of disputes and ahighly visible symbol of government under the rule of law.

The Code of Judicial Conduct is intended to establish standards for ethical conductof judges. It consists of broad statements called Canons, specific rules set forth in

Sections under each Canon, a Terminology Section, an Application Section andCommentary. The text of the Canons and the Sections, including the Terminology andApplication Sections, is authoritative. The Commentary, by explanation and example,provides guidance with respect to the purpose and meaning of the Canons and Sections.The Commentary is not intended as a statement of additional rules. When the text uses"shall" or "shall not," it is intended to impose binding obligations the violation of whichcan result in disciplinary action. When "should" or "should not" is used, the text isintended as hortatory and as a statement of what is or is not appropriate conduct but not asa binding rule under which a judge may be disciplined. When "may" is used, it denotespermissible discretion or, depending on the context, it refers to action that is not coveredby specific proscriptions. The Canons and Sections are rules of reason. They should beapplied consistent with constitutional requirements, statutes, other court rules anddecisional law and in the context of all relevant circumstances. The Code is to beconstrued so as not to impinge on the essential independence of judges in making judicialdecisions.

The Code is designed to provide guidance to judges and candidates for judicialoffice and to provide a structure for regulating conduct through disciplinary agencies. It isnot designed or intended as a basis for civil liability or criminal prosecution. Furthermore,the purpose of the Code would be subverted if the Code were invoked by lawyers formere tactical advantage in a proceeding.

The text of the Canons and Sections is intended to govern conduct of judges and tobe binding upon them. It is not intended, however, that every transgression will result indisciplinary action. Whether disciplinary action is appropriate, and the degree ofdiscipline to be imposed, should be determined through a reasonable and reasonedapplication of the text and should depend on such factors as the seriousness of thetransgression, whether there is a pattern of improper activity and the effect of theimproper activity on others or on the judicial system.

The Code of Judicial Conduct is not intended as an exhaustive guide for theconduct of judges. They should also be governed in their judicial and personal conduct bygeneral ethical standards. The Code is intended, however, to state basic standards whichshould govern the conduct of all judges and to provide guidance to assist judges inestablishing and maintaining high standards of judicial and personal conduct.

TERMINOLOGY

"Appropriate authority" denotes the authority with responsibility for initiation ofdisciplinary process with respect to the violation to be reported. See Sections 3D(1) and3D(2).

2

"Candidate." A candidate is a person seeking selection for judicial office byelection or appointment. Persons become candidates for judicial office as soon as theymake public announcements of candidacy, declare or file as candidates with the electionor appointment authority, or authorize solicitation or acceptance of contributions orsupport. The term "candidate" has the same meaning when applied to a judge seekingelection or appointment to non-judicial office. See Preamble and Canon 5.

"Court personnel" does not include the lawyers in a proceeding before a judge. SeeSections 3B(7)(c) and 3B(9).

"De minimis" denotes an insignificant interest that could not raise reasonablequestion as to a judge's impartiality. See Sections 3E(1)(c) and 3E(1)(d).

"Economic interest" denotes ownership of a more than de minimis legal orequitable interest, or a relationship as officer, director, advisor or other active participantin the affairs of a party, except that:

(i) ownership of an interest in a mutual or common investment fundthat holds securities is not an economic interest in such securities unless thejudge participates in the management of the fund or a proceeding pendingor impending before the judge could substantially affect the value of theinterest;

(ii) service by a judge as an officer, director, advisor or other activeparticipant in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal or civicorganization, or service by a judge's spouse, parent or child as an officer,director, advisor or other active participant in any organization does notcreate an economic interest in securities held by that organization;

(iii) a deposit in a financial institution, the proprietary interest of apolicy holder in a mutual insurance company, of a depositor in a mutualsavings association or of a member in a credit union, or a similarproprietary interest, is not an economic interest in the organization unless aproceeding pending or impending before the judge could substantiallyaffect the value of the interest;

(iv) ownership of government securities is not an economic interestin the issuer unless a proceeding pending or impending before the judgecould substantially affect the value of the securities. See Sections 3E(1)(c)and 3E(2).

3

"Fiduciary" includes such relationships as executor, administrator, trustee, andguardian. See Sections 3E(3) and 4E.

"Independent persons, committees or organizations" shall mean an individualperson or organization not required to report as affiliated with a campaign for judicialoffice. See Section 5F.

"Knowingly," "knowledge," "known" or "knows" denotes actual knowledge of thefact in question. A person's knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. See Sections3D, 3E(1), and 5A(3).

"Law" denotes court rules as well as statutes, constitutional provisions anddecisional law. See Sections 2A, 3A, 3B(2), 3B(7), 4B, 4C, 4F, 4I, 5A(2), 5A(3), 5B(2),5C, 5D, and 5F.

“Major donor”, for the purposes of Section 3E(2), shall be defined as follows:

(a) If the donor is an individual, "donor" means that individual, theindividual's spouse, or the individual’s or the individual’s spouse’s child,mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, grandchild, employee andemployee's spouse.

(b) If the donor is an entity other than an individual, "donor” meansthe entity, its employees, officers, directors, shareholders, partnersmembers, and contributors and the spouse of any of them.

(c) A “major donor” is a donor who or which has, in the judge'smost recent election campaign, made a contribution to the judge's campaign of (a) more than $2,000 if the judge is a justice of the SupremeCourt or judge of the Court of Appeals, or (b) more than $1,000 if the judgeis a judge of a court other than the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals.

(d) The term “contribution to the judge's campaign" shall be thetotal of all contributions to a judge's campaign and shall be deemed toinclude all contributions of every kind and type whatsoever, whether in theform of cash, goods, services, or other form of contribution, and whetherdonated directly to the judge's campaign or donated to any other person orentity for the purpose of supporting the judge's campaign and/or opposingthe campaign of the judge's opponent(s). The term "contribution to ajudge’s campaign" shall also be deemed to include any publication,advertisement or other release of information, or payment therefor, otherthan a bona fide news item published by existing news media, which

4

contains favorable information about the judge or which containsunfavorable information about the judge's opponent(s).

"Member of the candidate's family" denotes a spouse, child, grandchild, parent,grandparent, siblings, or other relative or person with whom the candidate maintains aclose familial relationship. See Section 5A(3)(a).

"Member of the judge's family" denotes a spouse, child, grandchild, parent,grandparent, siblings, or other relative or person with whom the judge maintains a closefamilial relationship. See Sections 4D, 4E and 4G.

"Member of the judge's family residing in the judge's household" denotes anyrelative of a judge by blood or marriage, or a person treated by a judge as a member of thejudge's family, who resides in the judge's household. See Sections 3E(1) and 4D.

"Nonpublic information" denotes information that, by law, is not available to thepublic. Nonpublic information may include but is not limited to: information that is sealedby statute or court order, impounded or communicated in camera; and information offeredin grand jury proceedings, presentencing reports, dependency cases or psychiatric reports.See Sections 3B(11) and 4D(4).

"Part-time judge" denotes a judge who serves for an extended, fixed term, but isallowed to practice law or any other profession or occupation. The term does not apply tomagistrates, court commissioners, special masters or referees.

"Political organization" denotes a political party or other group, the principalpurpose of which is to further the election or appointment of candidates to political office.See Sections 5A(1).

"Public election." This term includes primary and general elections; it includespartisan elections and nonpartisan elections. See Section 5C.

"Require." The rules prescribing that a judge "require" certain conduct of othersare, like all of the rules in this Code, rules of reason. The use of the term "require" in thatcontext means a judge is to exercise reasonable direction and control over the conduct ofthose persons subject to the judge's direction and control. See Sections 3B(3), 3B(4),3B(5), 3B(6), 3B(9) and 3C(2).

"Special judge" denotes a judge, including a retired judge, other than one who isserving to fill the unexpired term of a regularly elected or appointed judge who hasvacated the office, who serves by appointment for a limited period or in a particular

5

matter due to the unwillingness or inability of a sitting judge to hear a case or attendcourt, or who is appointed on an emergency basis.

"Third degree of relationship." The following persons are relatives within the thirddegree of relationship: great-grandparent, grandparent, parent, uncle, aunt, brother, sister,child, grandchild, great-grandchild, nephew or niece. See Section 3E(1)(d).

Commentary

In defining “members of the candidate’s family” and “members of the judge’sfamily” siblings of the candidate and judge are included. The phrase “major donor” isalso included. Likewise, no reference is made to retention elections. In these respects,this section differs from the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct.

The ABA Model Code defines “continuing part-time judge,” “periodic part-timejudge,” and “pro tempore part-time judge.” Also, in the Application Section, the ABAmodel refers to “retired judge subject to recall.” In the adaption of the model forMississippi application, these are reduced to “part-time judge,” and “special judge,”which covers non-standard positions subject to special treatment. See ApplicationSection.

CANON 1

A Judge Shall Uphold the Integrityand Independence of the Judiciary

An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in oursociety. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing highstandards of conduct, and shall personally observe those standards so that theintegrity and independence of the judiciary will be preserved. The provisions of thisCode should be construed and applied to further that objective.

Commentary

Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends upon public confidencein the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and independence of judgesdepends in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should beindependent, they must comply with the law, including the provisions of this Code. Publicconfidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of eachjudge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes publicconfidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government underlaw.

6

CANON 2

A Judge Shall Avoid Impropriety and theAppearance of Impropriety in All Activities

A. A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times ina manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of thejudiciary.

Commentary

Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conductby judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. A judgemust expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. A judge must therefore acceptrestrictions on the judge's conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinarycitizen and should do so freely and willingly.

The prohibition against behaving with impropriety or the appearance ofimpropriety applies to both the professional and personal conduct of a judge. Because itis not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the proscription is necessarily cast in generalterms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentionedin the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, courtrules or other specific provisions of this Code. The test for appearance of impropriety iswhether, based on the conduct, the judge’s impartiality might be questioned by areasonable person knowing all the circumstances.

See also Commentary under Section 2C.

B. Judges shall not allow their family, social, or other relationships toinfluence the judges’ judicial conduct or judgment. Judges shall not lend theprestige of their offices to advance the private interests of the judges or others; norshall judges convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in aspecial position to influence the judges. Judges shall not testify voluntarily ascharacter witnesses.

Commentary

Maintaining the prestige of judicial office is essential to a system of government inwhich the judiciary functions independently of the executive and legislative branches.Respect for the judicial office facilitates the orderly conduct of legitimate judicialfunctions. Judges should distinguish between proper and improper use of the prestige of

7

office in all of their activities. For example, it would be improper for judges to allude totheir judgeships to gain a personal advantage such as deferential treatment when stoppedby a police officer for a traffic offense. Similarly, judicial letterhead must not be used forconducting a judge's personal business.

A judge must avoid lending the prestige of judicial office for the advancement ofthe private interests of others. For example, a judge must not use the judge's judicialposition to gain advantage in a civil suit involving a member of the judge's family. Incontracts for publication of a judge's writings, a judge should retain control over theadvertising to avoid exploitation of the judge's office.

Although a judge should be sensitive to possible abuse of the prestige of office, ajudge may, based on the judge's personal knowledge, serve as a reference or provide aletter of recommendation. However, a judge must not initiate the communication ofinformation to a sentencing judge or a probation or corrections officer but may provideto such persons information for the record in response to a formal request.

Judges may participate in the process of judicial selection by cooperating withappointing authorities and screening committees seeking names for consideration, and byresponding to official inquiries concerning a person being considered for a judgeship.See also Canon 5 regarding use of a judge's name in political activities.

A judge must not testify voluntarily as a character witness because to do so maylend the prestige of the judicial office in support of the party for whom the judge testifies. Moreover, when a judge testifies as a witness, a lawyer who regularly appears before thejudge may be placed in the awkward position of cross-examining the judge. A judge may,however, testify when properly summoned. Except in unusual circumstances where thedemands of justice require, a judge should discourage a party from requiring the judge totestify as a character witness.

C. A judge shall not hold membership in any organization that practicesinvidious discrimination on the basis of race, gender, religion or national origin.

Commentary

Membership of a judge in an organization that practices invidious discriminationgives rise to perceptions that the judge's impartiality is impaired. Section 2C refers to thecurrent practices of the organization. Whether an organization practices invidiousdiscrimination is often a complex question to which judges should be sensitive. Theanswer cannot be determined from a mere examination of an organization's currentmembership rolls but rather depends on how the organization selects members and otherrelevant factors, such as that the organization is dedicated to the preservation of

8

religious, ethnic or cultural values of legitimate common interest to its members, or that itis in fact and effect an intimate, purely private organization whose membershiplimitations could not be constitutionally prohibited. Absent such factors, an organizationis generally said to discriminate invidiously if it arbitrarily excludes from membership onthe basis of race, religion, gender or national origin persons who would otherwise beadmitted to membership. See New York State Club Ass'n. v. City of New York, U.S. , 108 S.Ct. 2225, 101 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988); Board of Directors of Rotary International v.Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 U.S. 537, 107 S.Ct. 1940, 95 L.Ed.2d 474 (1987); Roberts v.United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 104 S.Ct. 3244, 82 L.Ed.2d 462 (1984).

Although Section 2C relates only to membership in organizations that invidiouslydiscriminate on the basis of race, gender, religion or national origin, a judge'smembership in an organization that engages in any discriminatory membership practicesprohibited by the law of the jurisdiction also violates Canon 2 and Section 2A and givesthe appearance of impropriety. In addition, it would be a violation of Canon 2 andSection 2A for a judge to arrange a meeting at a club that the judge knows practicesinvidious discrimination on the basis of race, gender, religion or national origin in itsmembership or other policies, or for the judge to regularly use such a club. Moreover,public manifestation by a judge of the judge's knowing approval of invidiousdiscrimination on any basis gives the appearance of impropriety under Canon 2 anddiminishes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, in violationof Section 2A.

When a person who is a judge on the date this Code becomes effective learns thatan organization to which the judge belongs engages in invidious discrimination thatwould preclude membership under Section 2C or under Canon 2 and Section 2A, thejudge is permitted, in lieu of resigning, to make immediate efforts to have theorganization discontinue its invidiously discriminatory practices, but is required tosuspend participation in any other activities of the organization. If the organization failsto discontinue its invidiously discriminatory practices as promptly as possible (and in allevents within a year of the judge's first learning of the practices), the judge is required toresign immediately from the organization.

CANON 3

A Judge Shall Perform the Duties of Judicial OfficeImpartially and Diligently

A. Judicial Duties in General. The judicial duties of judges take precedenceover all their other activities. The judges’ judicial duties include all the duties oftheir office prescribed by law. In the performance of these duties, the followingstandards apply:

9

B. Adjudicative Responsibilities.

(1) A judge shall hear and decide all assigned matters within the judge’sjurisdiction except those in which disqualification is required.

(2) A judge shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competencein it. A judge shall not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor, or fear ofcriticism.

(3) A judge shall require order and decorum in proceedings before the judge.

(4) Judges shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors,witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom they deal in their official capacities, andshall require similar conduct of lawyers, and of their staffs, court officials, andothers subject to their direction and control.

Commentary

The duty to hear all proceedings fairly and with patience is not inconsistent withthe duty to dispose promptly of the business of the court. Courts can be efficient andbusiness like while being patient and deliberate.

(5) A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A judgeshall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias orprejudice, including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, gender,religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status,and shall not permit staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's directionand control to do so. A judge shall refrain from speech, gestures or other conductthat could reasonably be perceived as sexual harassment and shall require the samestandard of conduct of others subject to the judge’s direction and control.

Commentary

A judge must perform judicial duties impartially and fairly. A judge who manifestsbias on any basis in a proceeding impairs the fairness of the proceeding and brings thejudiciary into disrepute. Facial expression and body language, in addition to oralcommunication, can give to parties or lawyers in the proceeding, jurors, the media andothers an appearance of judicial bias. A judge must be alert to avoid behavior that maybe perceived as prejudicial.

(6) A judge shall require lawyers in proceedings before the judge to refrainfrom manifesting, by words or conduct, bias or prejudice based upon race, gender,religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status,

10

against parties, witnesses, counsel or others. This Section 3B(6) does not precludelegitimate advocacy when race, gender, religion, national origin, disability, age,sexual orientation or socioeconomic status, or other similar factors, are issues in the proceeding.

(7) A judge shall accord to all who are legally interested in a proceeding, ortheir lawyers, the right to be heard according to law. A judge shall not initiate,permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communicationsmade to the judge outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending orimpending proceeding except that:

(a) where circumstances require, ex parte communications forscheduling, administrative purposes or emergencies that do not dealwith substantive matters or issues on the merits are authorized:provided:

(i) the judge reasonably believes that no party willgain a procedural or tactical advantage as a result of theex parte communication, and

(ii) the judge makes provision promptly to notify allother parties of the substance of the ex partecommunication and allows an opportunity to respond.

(b) Judges may obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on thelaw applicable to a proceeding before them if the judges give notice tothe parties of the person consulted and the substance of the advice, andafford the parties reasonable opportunity to respond.

(c) A judge may consult with court personnel whose function isto aid the judge in carrying out the judge's adjudicative responsibilitiesor with other judges.

(d) A judge may, with the consent of the parties, conferseparately with the parties and their lawyers in an effort to mediate orsettle matters pending before the judge.

(e) A judge may initiate or consider any ex partecommunications when expressly authorized by law to do so.

11

Commentary

12

The proscription against communications concerning a proceeding includescommunications from lawyers, law teachers, and other persons who are not participantsin the proceeding, except to the limited extent permitted. To the extent reasonablypossible, all parties or their lawyers shall be included in communications with a judge.Whenever presence of a party or notice to a party is required by Section 3B(7), it is theparty's lawyer, or if the party is unrepresented, the party, who is to be present or to whomnotice is to be given.

An appropriate and often desirable procedure for a court to obtain the advice of adisinterested expert on legal issues is to invite the expert to file a brief amicus curiae.

Certain ex parte communication is approved by Section 3B(7) to facilitatescheduling and other administrative purposes and to accommodate emergencies. Ingeneral, however, a judge must discourage ex parte communication and allow it only ifall the criteria stated in Section 3B(7) are clearly met. A judge must disclose to all partiesall ex parte communications described in Sections 3B(7)(a) and 3B(7)(b) regarding aproceeding pending or impending before the judge. A judge must not independentlyinvestigate facts in a case and must consider only the evidence presented.

A judge may request a party to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions oflaw, so long as the other parties are apprized of the request and are given an opportunityto respond to the proposed findings and conclusions.

A judge must make reasonable efforts, including the provision of appropriatesupervision, to ensure that Section 3B(7) is not violated through law clerks or otherpersonnel on the judge's staff.

If communication between the trial judge and the appellate court with respect to aproceeding is permitted, a copy of any written communication or the substance of anyoral communication should be provided to all parties.

(8) A judge shall dispose of all judicial matters promptly, efficiently andfairly.

Commentary

In disposing of matters promptly, efficiently and fairly, a judge must demonstratedue regard for the rights of the parties to be heard and to have issues resolved withoutunnecessary cost or delay. Containing costs while preserving fundamental rights ofparties also protects the interests of witnesses and the general public. A judge shouldmonitor and supervise cases so as to reduce or eliminate dilatory practices, avoidabledelays and unnecessary costs. A judge should encourage and seek to facilitate settlement,

13

but parties should not feel coerced into surrendering the right to have their controversyresolved by the courts.

Prompt disposition of the court's business requires a judge to devote adequate timeto judicial duties, to be punctual in attending court and expeditious in determiningmatters under submission, and to insist that court officials, litigants and their lawyerscooperate with the judge to that end.

(9) A judge shall not, while a proceeding is pending or impending in anycourt, make any public comment that might reasonably be expected to affect itsoutcome or impair its fairness or make any nonpublic comment that mightsubstantially interfere with a fair trial or hearing. The judge shall require similarabstention on the part of court personnel subject to the judge's direction andcontrol. This Section does not prohibit judges from making public statements in thecourse of their official duties or from explaining for public information theprocedures of the court. This Section does not apply to proceedings in which thejudge is a litigant in a personal capacity.

Commentary

The requirement that judges abstain from public comment regarding a pending orimpending proceeding continues during any appellate process and until final disposition.This Section does not prohibit a judge from commenting on proceedings in which thejudge is a litigant in a personal capacity, but in cases such as a writ of mandamus wherethe judge is a litigant in an official capacity, the judge must not comment publicly. Theconduct of lawyers relating to trial publicity is governed by Rule 3.6 of the Rules ofProfessional Conduct.

(10) A judge shall not commend or criticize jurors for their verdict other thanin a court order or opinion in a proceeding, but may express appreciation to jurorsfor their service to the judicial system and the community.

Commentary

Commending or criticizing jurors for their verdict may imply a judicialexpectation in future cases and may impair a juror's ability to be fair and impartial in asubsequent case.

(11) A judge shall not disclose or use, for any purpose unrelated to judicialduties, nonpublic information acquired in a judicial capacity.

(12) Except as may be authorized by rule or order of the Supreme Court, ajudge should prohibit broadcasting, televising, recording, or taking photographs in

14

the courtroom and areas immediately adjacent thereto during sessions of court orrecesses between sessions, except that a judge may authorize:

(a) the use of electronic or photographic means for thepresentation of evidence, for the perpetuation of a record, or for otherpurposes of judicial administration;

(b) the broadcasting, televising, recording, or photographing ofinvestitive, ceremonial, or naturalization proceedings;

(c) the photographic or electronic recording and reproduction ofappropriate court proceedings under the following conditions:

(i) the means of recording will not distractparticipants or impair the dignity of the proceedings;

(ii) the parties have consented, and the consent tobeing depicted or recorded has been obtained from eachwitness appearing in the recording and reproduction;

(iii) the reproduction will not be exhibited untilafter the proceeding has been concluded and all directappeals have been exhausted; and

(iv) the reproduction will be exhibited only forinstructional purposes in educational institutions.

Commentary

The ABA Model Code does not address broadcasting, televising, recording orphotographing in the courtroom. This provision is taken from the Section 3A(7) of theprior Mississippi Code of Judicial Conduct.

Section 3B(12) prohibits broadcasting, televising, recording, or takingphotographs in the courtroom and areas immediately adjacent thereto except asauthorized by rule or order of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has now adoptedthe Rules for Electronic and Photographic Coverage of Proceedings which providesdetailed guidance for such coverage.

[Commentary amended effective April 17, 2003.]

C. Administrative Responsibilities.

15

(1) A judge shall diligently discharge the judge's administrativeresponsibilities without bias or prejudice and maintain professional competence injudicial administration, and shall cooperate with other judges and court officials inthe administration of court business.

(2) A judge shall require staff, court officials and others subject to the judge'sdirection and control to observe the standards of fidelity and diligence that apply tothe judge and to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice in the performance oftheir official duties.

(3) A judge with supervisory authority for the judicial performance of otherjudges shall take reasonable measures to assure the prompt disposition of mattersbefore them and the proper performance of their other judicial responsibilities.

(4) A judge shall not make unnecessary appointments. A judge shall exercisethe power of appointment impartially and on the basis of merit. A judge shall avoidnepotism and favoritism. A judge shall not approve compensation of appointeesbeyond the fair value of services rendered.

Commentary

Appointees of a judge include assigned counsel, officials such as referees,commissioners, special masters, receivers and guardians and personnel such as clerks,secretaries and bailiffs. Consent by the parties to an appointment or an award ofcompensation does not relieve the judge of the obligation prescribed by Section 3C(4).

(5) A judge shall not appoint a major donor to the judge’s election campaignto a position if the judge knows or learns by means of a timely motion that the majordonor has contributed to the judge's election campaign unless

(a) the position is substantially uncompensated;

(b) the person has been selected in rotation from a list ofqualified and available persons compiled without regard to theirhaving made political contributions; or

(c) the judge or another presiding or administrative judgeaffirmatively finds that no other person is willing, competent and ableto accept the position.

D. Disciplinary Responsibilities.

16

(1) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood thatanother judge has committed a violation of this Code should take appropriateaction. A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation ofthis Code that raises a substantial question as to the other judge's fitness for officeshall inform the appropriate authority.

(2) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that alawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct should takeappropriate action. A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed aviolation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as tothe lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shallinform the appropriate authority.

(3) Acts of a judge, in the discharge of disciplinary responsibilities, requiredor permitted by Sections 3D(1) and 3D(2) are part of a judge's judicial duties andshall be absolutely privileged, and no civil action predicated thereon may beinstituted against the judge.

Commentary

Appropriate action may include direct communication with the judge or lawyerwho has committed the violation, other direct action if available, and reporting theviolation to the appropriate authority or other agency or body.

E. Disqualification.

(1) Judges should disqualify themselves in proceedings in which theirimpartiality might be questioned by a reasonable person knowing all thecircumstances or for other grounds provided in the Code of Judicial Conduct orotherwise as provided by law, including but not limited to instances where:

Commentary

Under this rule, a judge should disqualify himself or herself whenever the judge'simpartiality might be questioned by a reasonable person knowing all the circumstances,regardless whether any of the specific rules in Section 3E(1) apply.

A judge should disclose on the record information that the judge believes theparties or their lawyers might consider relevant to the question of disqualification, even ifthe judge believes there is no real basis for disqualification.

By decisional law, the rule of necessity may override the rule of disqualification.For example, a judge might be required to participate in judicial review of a judicial

17

salary statute, or might be the only judge available in a matter requiring immediatejudicial action, such as a hearing on probable cause or a temporary restraining order. Inthe latter case, the judge must disclose on the record the basis for possibledisqualification and use reasonable efforts to transfer the matter to another judge as soonas practicable.

For procedures concerning motions for recusal and review by the Supreme Courtof denial of motions for recusal as to trial court judges, see M.R.C.P. 16A, URCCC 1.15,Unif. Chanc. R. 1.11, and M.R.A.P. 48B. For procedures concerning motions for recusalof judges of the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court justices, see M.R.A.P. 27(a).

(a) the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning aparty, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerningthe proceeding;

(b) the judge served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or alawyer with whom the judge previously practiced law served duringsuch association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge orsuch lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;

Commentary

A lawyer in a government agency does not ordinarily have an association withother lawyers employed by that agency within the meaning of Section 3E(1)(b); judgesformerly employed by a government agency, however, should disqualify themselves in aproceeding if the judges’ impartiality might reasonably be questioned because of suchassociation.

(c) the judge knows that the judge, individually or as a fiduciary,or the judge's spouse or member of the judge’s family residing in thejudge’s household, has a financial interest in the subject matter incontroversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest thatcould be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

(d) the judge or the judge's spouse, or a person within the thirddegree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:

(i) is a party to the proceeding, or an officer,director, or trustee of a party;

(ii) is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;

18

(iii) is known by the judge to have an interest that couldbe substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

(iv) is to the judge's knowledge likely to be amaterial witness in the proceeding;

Commentary

The fact that a lawyer in a proceeding is affiliated with a law firm with which arelative of the judge is affiliated does not of itself disqualify the judge. Under appropriatecircumstances, the fact that “the judge’s impartiality might be questioned by areasonable person knowing all the circumstances “ under Section 3E(1), or that therelative is known by the judge to have an interest in the law firm that could be"substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding" under Section 3E(1)(d)(iii) mayrequire the judge's disqualification.

(2) Recusal of Judges from Lawsuits Involving Major Donors. A party mayfile a motion to recuse a judge based on the fact that an opposing party or counsel ofrecord for that party is a major donor to the election campaign of such judge. Suchmotions will be filed, considered and subject to appellate review as provided forother motions for recusal.

Commentary

Section 3E(2) recognizes that political donations may but do not necessarily raiseconcerns about a judge’s impartiality. The filing, consideration and appellate review ofmotions for recusal based on such donations are subject to rules governing all recusalmotions. For procedures concerning motions for recusal and review by the SupremeCourt of denial of motions for recusal as to trial court judges, see M.R.C.P. 16A, URCCC1.15, Unif. Chanc. R. 1.11, and M.R.A.P. 48B. For procedures concerning motions forrecusal of judges of the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court justices, see M.R.A.P. 27(a). This provision does not appear in the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct; however, seeSection 3E(1)(e) of the ABA model.

F. Remittal of Disqualification. A judge who may be disqualified by theterms of Section 3E may disclose on the record the basis of the judge's possibledisqualification and may ask the parties and their lawyers to consider, out of thepresence of the judge, whether to waive disqualification. If following disclosure ofany basis for disqualification other than personal bias or prejudice concerning aparty, the parties and lawyers, without participation by the judge, all agree that the

19

judge should not be disqualified, and the judge is then willing to participate, thejudge may participate in the proceeding. The agreement shall be incorporated inthe record of the proceeding.

Commentary

A remittal procedure provides the parties an opportunity to proceed without delayif they wish to waive the possible disqualification. To assure that consideration of thequestion of remittal is made independently of the judge, a judge must not solicit, seek orhear comment on the remittal or waiver of the possible disqualification unless the lawyersjointly propose remittal after consultation as provided in the rule. A party may actthrough counsel if counsel represents on the record that the party has been consulted andconsents. As a practical matter, a judge may wish to have all parties and their lawyerssign the remittal agreement.

CANON 4

A Judge Shall So Conduct the Judge's Extra-judicial Activities as toMinimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Obligations

A. Extra-judicial Activities in General. A judge shall conduct all of the judge'sextra-judicial activities so that they do not:

(1) cast reasonable doubt on the judge's capacity to actimpartially as a judge;

(2) demean the judicial office; or

(3) interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties.

Commentary

Complete separation of a judge from extra-judicial activities is neither possiblenor wise; a judge should not become isolated from the community in which the judgelives.

Expressions of bias or prejudice by a judge, even outside the judge's judicialactivities, may cast reasonable doubt on the judge's capacity to act impartially as a judge.Expressions which may do so include jokes or other remarks demeaning individuals onthe basis of their race, gender, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientationor socioeconomic status. See Section 2C and accompanying Commentary.

20

B. Avocational Activities. A judge may speak, write, lecture, teach andparticipate in other extra-judicial activities concerning the law, the legal system, theadministration of justice and non-legal subjects, subject to the requirements of thisCode.

Commentary

As a judicial officer and person specially learned in the law, a judge is in a uniqueposition to contribute to the improvement of the law, the legal system, and theadministration of justice, including revision of substantive and procedural law andimprovement of criminal and juvenile justice. To the extent that time permits, a judge isencouraged to do so, either independently or through a bar association, judicialconference or other organization dedicated to the improvement of the law. Judges mayparticipate in efforts to promote the fair administration of justice, the independence of thejudiciary and the integrity of the legal profession and may express opposition to thepersecution of lawyers and judges in other countries because of their professionalactivities.

In this and other Sections of Canon 4, the phrase "subject to the requirements ofthis Code" is used, notably in connection with a judge's governmental, civic or charitableactivities. This phrase is included to remind judges that the use of permissive language invarious Sections of the Code does not relieve a judge from the other requirements of theCode that apply to the specific conduct.

C. Governmental, Civic or Charitable Activities.

(1) A judge shall not make an appearance before, or otherwise consult with,an executive or legislative body or official or a public hearing except on mattersconcerning the law, the legal system or the administration of justice or except whenacting pro se in a matter involving the judge or the judge's interests.

Commentary

See Section 2B regarding the obligation to avoid improper influence.

(2) A judge shall not accept appointment to a governmental committee orcommission or other governmental position that is concerned with issues of fact orpolicy on matters other than the improvement of the law, the legal system or theadministration of justice. A judge may, however, represent a country, state orlocality on ceremonial occasions or in connection with historical, educational orcultural activities.

Commentary

21

Section 4C(2) prohibits a judge from accepting any governmental position exceptone relating to the improvement of the law, legal system or administration of justice asauthorized by Section 4C(3). The appropriateness of accepting extra-judicial assignmentsmust be assessed in light of the demands on judicial resources created by crowdeddockets and the need to protect the courts from involvement in extra-judicial matters thatmay prove to be controversial. Judges should not accept governmental appointments thatare likely to interfere with the effectiveness and independence of the judiciary.

Section 4C(2) does not govern a judge's service in a non-governmental position.See Section 4C(3) permitting service by a judge with organizations devoted to theimprovement of the law, the legal system or the administration of justice and witheducational, religious, charitable, fraternal or civic organizations not conducted forprofit. For example, service on the board of a public educational institution, unless itwere a law school, would be prohibited under Section 4C(2), but service on the board ofa public law school or any private educational institution would generally be permittedunder Section 4C(3).

(3) A judge may serve as an officer, director, trustee or non-legal advisor ofan organization or governmental agency devoted to the improvement of the law, thelegal system or the administration of justice or of an educational, religious,charitable, fraternal or civic organization not conducted for profit, subject to thefollowing limitations and the other requirements of this Code.

Commentary

Section 4C(3) does not apply to a judge's service in a governmental positionunconnected with the improvement of the law, the legal system or the administration ofjustice. See Section 4C(2).

See Commentary to Section 4B regarding use of the phrase "subject to thefollowing limitations and the other requirements of this Code." As an example of themeaning of the phrase, a judge permitted by Section 4C(3) to serve on the board of afraternal institution may be prohibited from such service by Sections 2C or 4A if theinstitution practices invidious discrimination or if service on the board otherwise castsreasonable doubt on the judge's capacity to act impartially as a judge.

Service by a judge on behalf of a civic or charitable organization may be governedby other provisions of Canon 4 in addition to Section 4C. For example, a judge isprohibited by Section 4G from serving as a legal advisor to a civic or charitableorganization.

22

(a) A judge shall not serve as an officer, director, trustee ornon-legal advisor if it is likely that the organization:

(i) will be engaged in proceedings that wouldordinarily come before the judge, or

(ii) will be engaged frequently in adversaryproceedings in the court of which the judge is a memberor in any court subject to the appellate jurisdiction of thecourt of which the judge is a member.

Commentary

The changing nature of some organizations and of their relationship to the lawmakes it necessary for a judge regularly to reexamine the activities of each organizationwith which the judge is affiliated to determine if it is proper for the judge to continue theaffiliation. For example, in many jurisdictions charitable hospitals are now morefrequently in court than in the past. Similarly, the boards of some legal aid organizationsnow make policy decisions that may have political significance or imply commitment tocauses that may come before the courts for adjudication.

(b) A judge as an officer, director, trustee or non-legal advisor, or as amember or otherwise:

(i) may assist such an organization in planningfund-raising and may participate in the management andinvestment of the organization's funds, but shall notpersonally participate in the solicitation of funds or otherfund-raising activities, except that a judge may solicitfunds from other judges over whom the judge does notexercise supervisory or appellate authority;

(ii) may make recommendations to public andprivate fund-granting organizations on projects andprograms concerning the law, the legal system or theadministration of justice;

(iii) shall not personally participate in membershipsolicitation if the solicitation might reasonably beperceived as coercive or, except as permitted in Section4C(3)(b)(i), if the membership solicitation is essentially afund-raising mechanism;

23

(iv) shall not use or permit the use of the prestige ofjudicial office for fund-raising or membership solicitation.

Commentary

A judge may solicit membership or endorse or encourage membership efforts foran organization devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system or theadministration of justice or a nonprofit educational, religious, charitable, fraternal orcivic organization as long as the solicitation cannot reasonably be perceived as coerciveand is not essentially a fund-raising mechanism. Solicitation of funds for an organizationand solicitation of memberships similarly involve the danger that the person solicited willfeel obligated to respond favorably to the solicitor if the solicitor is in a position ofinfluence or control. A judge must not engage in direct, individual solicitation of funds ormemberships in person, in writing or by telephone except in the following cases: 1) ajudge may solicit for funds or memberships other judges over whom the judge does notexercise supervisory or appellate authority, 2) a judge may solicit other persons formembership in the organizations described above if neither those persons nor personswith whom they are affiliated are likely ever to appear before the court on which thejudge serves and 3) a judge who is an officer of such an organization may send a generalmembership solicitation mailing over the judge's signature.

Use of an organization letterhead for fund-raising or membership solicitation doesnot violate Section 4C(3)(b) provided the letterhead lists only the judge's name and officeor other position in the organization, and, if comparable designations are listed for otherpersons, the judge's judicial designation. In addition, a judge must also make reasonableefforts to ensure that the judge's staff, court officials and others subject to the judge'sdirection and control do not solicit funds on the judge's behalf for any purpose,charitable or otherwise.

A judge must not be a speaker or guest of honor at an organization's fund- raisingevent, but mere attendance at such an event is permissible if otherwise consistent withthis Code.

D. Financial Activities.

(1) Judges should refrain from financial and business dealings that tend toreflect adversely on their impartiality, interfere with the proper performance oftheir judicial duties, exploit their judicial positions, or involve them in frequenttransactions with lawyers or persons likely to come before the court on which thejudges serve.

24

(2) Judges should manage their investments and other financial interests tominimize the number of cases in which they are disqualified. As soon as a judge cando so without serious financial detriment, the judge should divest himself or herselfof investments and other financial interests that might require frequentdisqualification.

(3) Neither judges nor members of their families residing in their householdsshould accept a gift, bequest, favor, or loan from anyone reflecting the expectationof judicial favor.

(4) Non-public information acquired by a judge in the judge’s judicialcapacity should not be used or disclosed by the judge in financial dealings or for anyother purpose not related to the judge’s judicial duties.

Commentary

The prohibition of Section 4D(3), limiting gifts which judges and their familiesmay accept, does not prohibit gifts incident to public testimonials to the judges, bookssupplied by publishers on a complimentary basis for official use, and invitations to judgesand their spouses to attend bar-related functions or activities devoted to theimprovements of the law, the legal system or the administration of justice. Judges andtheir families residing in their households may accept ordinary social hospitality, gifts,bequests, favors and loans from relatives, wedding and engagement gifts, loans fromlending institutions in their regular course of business on the same terms generallyavailable to persons who are not judges, and scholarships and fellowships awarded onthe same terms applied to other applicants. Judges and members of their familiesresiding in their households may accept any other gifts, bequests, favors and loans only ifthe donor is not a party or likely to come before them, and the gifts are reported as maybe required by law. Gifts, bequests, favors and loans are to be reported as may berequired by the Ethics in Government statutes. See Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-27. Section4D differs from the provisions of the ABA model and retains in large part the provisionsof the Mississippi Code of Judicial Conduct as it existed prior to the current revision. Although this section does not prohibit holding specific extra-judicial positions orengaging in other specific business activities, it does require that judges refrain frombusiness activities which might reflect adversely on their impartiality and that theymanage their business activities so as to minimize the need for recusal. Regardingrecusals and disqualification, see Section 3E.

E. Fiduciary Activities.

25

(1) A judge shall not serve as executor, administrator or other personalrepresentative, trustee, guardian, attorney in fact or other fiduciary except for theestate, trust or person of a member of the judge's family, and then only if suchservice will not interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties.

(2) A judge shall not serve as a fiduciary if it is likely that the judge as afiduciary will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before thejudge, or if the estate, trust or ward becomes involved in adversary proceedings inthe court on which the judge serves or one under its appellate jurisdiction.

(3) The same restrictions on financial activities that apply to a judgepersonally also apply to the judge while acting in a fiduciary capacity.

Commentary

The Time for Compliance provision of this Code (Application, Section E)postpones the time for compliance with certain provisions of this Section in some cases.

The restrictions imposed by this Canon may conflict with the judge's obligation asa fiduciary. For example, a judge should resign as trustee if detriment to the trust wouldresult from divestiture of holdings, the retention of which would place the judge inviolation of Section 4D(3).

F. Service as Arbitrator or Mediator. A judge shall not act as an arbitratoror mediator or otherwise perform judicial functions in a private capacity unlessexpressly authorized by law.

Commentary

Section 4F does not prohibit a judge from participating in arbitration, mediationor settlement conferences performed as part of judicial duties.

G. Practice of Law.

(1) A judge shall not practice law. Notwithstanding thisprohibition, a judge may act pro se and may, without compensation,

26

give legal advice to and draft or review documents for a member of thejudge's family.

(2) A judge must also make reasonable efforts to ensure that thejudge's staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's directionand control do not practice law in a representative capacity.Notwithstanding this prohibition, staff, court officials and otherssubject to the judge’s direction may act pro se, and those otherwiselicensed to practice law may, without compensation, give legal advice toand draft or review documents for members of their families.

Commentary

This prohibition refers to the practice of law in a representativecapacity and not in a pro se capacity. Judges may act for themselves in alllegal matters, including matters involving litigation and matters involvingappearances before or other dealings with legislative and othergovernmental bodies. However, in so doing, a judge must not abuse theprestige of office to advance the interests of the judge or the judge's family.See Section 2(B). Certain officials and others are exempt pursuant toSection D of the Application Section of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

The Code allows a judge to give legal advice to and draft legaldocuments for members of the judge's family, so long as the judge receivesno compensation. A judge must not, however, act as an advocate ornegotiator for a member of the judge's family in a legal matter. Thisprovision does not imply any privilege to practice law to those judges, staffmembers, court officials or others subject to the judge’s control anddirection who are not licensed to practice law.

Amended May 31, 2007.

H. Compensation, Reimbursement and Reporting.

(1) Compensation and Reimbursement. A judge may receive compensationand reimbursement of expenses for the extra-judicial activities permitted by thisCode, if the source of such payments does not give the appearance of influencing thejudge's performance of judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance ofimpropriety.

27

(a) Compensation shall not exceed a reasonable amount nor shallit exceed what a person who is not a judge would receive for the sameactivity.

(b) Expense reimbursement shall be limited to the actual cost oftravel, food and lodging reasonably incurred by the judge and, whereappropriate to the occasion, by the judge's spouse or guest. Anypayment in excess of such an amount is compensation.

(2) Public Reports. A judge shall comply with those provisions of lawrequiring the reporting of economic interest to the Mississippi Ethics Commission.

Commentary

See Commentary to Section 4D(4) regarding reporting of gifts, bequests and loans. See also Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-4-25 through 29 regarding the filing of statements ofeconomic interest with the Mississippi Ethics Commission. The ABA model suggests thatsince Canon 6 in the 1972 model code was drafted, reporting requirements in mostjurisdictions have become much more comprehensive, and that canons regulatingreporting of income should be tailored to the requirements of individual jurisdictions. Subsection 4H 2), therefore, simply requires compliance with the statutory provisions forreporting to the Ethics Commission.

The Code does not prohibit a judge from accepting honoraria or speaking feesprovided that the compensation is reasonable and commensurate with the task performed.A judge should ensure, however, that no conflicts are created by the arrangement. Ajudge must not appear to trade on the judicial position for personal advantage. Norshould a judge spend significant time away from court duties to meet speaking or writingcommitments for compensation. In addition, the source of the payment must not raise anyquestion of undue influence or the judge's ability or willingness to be impartial.

I. Disclosure of a judge's income, debts, investments or other assets isrequired only to the extent provided in this Canon and in Sections 3E and 3F, or asotherwise required by law.

Commentary

Section 3E requires judges to disqualify themselves in any proceedings in whichthey have economic interests. See "economic interest" as explained in the TerminologySection. Section 4D requires judges to refrain from engaging in business and fromfinancial activities that might interfere with the impartial performance of judicial duties;Section 4H requires judges to report compensation they received for activities outside

28

judicial office. Judges have the rights of any other citizens, including the right to privacyof the judges’ financial affairs, except to the extent that limitations established by law arerequired to safeguard the proper performance of the judges’ duties.

CANON 5

A Judge or Judicial Candidate Shall Refrain From Inappropriate Political Activity

A. All Judges and Candidates

(1) Except as authorized in Sections 5B(2), 5C(1) and 5C(2), a judge or acandidate for election to judicial office shall not:

(a) act as a leader or hold an office in a political organization;

(b) make speeches for a political organization or candidate orpublicly endorse a candidate for public office;

(c) solicit funds for or pay an assessment or make a contributionto a political organization or candidate, attend political gatherings, orpurchase tickets for political party dinners, or other political functions.

Commentary

A judge or candidate for judicial office retains the right to participate in thepolitical process as a voter.

Where false information concerning a judicial candidate is made public, a judgeor another judicial candidate having knowledge of the facts is not prohibited by Section5A(1) from making the facts public.

Section 5A(1)(a) does not prohibit a candidate for elective judicial office fromretaining during candidacy a public office such as county prosecutor, which is not "anoffice in a political organization."

Section 5A(1)(b) does not prohibit judges or judicial candidate from privatelyexpressing their views on judicial candidates or other candidates for public office.

A candidate does not publicly endorse another candidate for public office byhaving that candidate's name on the same ticket. However, Sections 23-15-973 et seq.,

29

Miss. Code Ann. (1972) impose restrictions on candidates and political organizations toassure the non-partisan quality of judicial elections for Supreme Court, Court of Appeals,Chancery Court, Circuit Court and County Court justices and judges.

(2) A judge shall resign from judicial office upon becoming a candidate eitherin a party primary or in a general election for a non-judicial office, except that thejudge may continue to hold judicial office while being a candidate for election to orserving as a delegate in a state constitutional convention if the judge is otherwisepermitted by law to do so.

(3) A candidate for a judicial office:

(a) shall maintain the dignity appropriate to judicial office andact in a manner consistent with the integrity and independence of thejudiciary, and shall encourage members of the candidate's family toadhere to the same standards of political conduct in support of thecandidate as apply to the candidate;

Commentary

Although judicial candidates must encourage members of their families to adhereto the same standards of political conduct in support of the candidates that apply to thecandidates, family members are free to participate in other political activity. Familymembers are not prohibited by this subsection from serving on the candidates’ campaigncommittees and otherwise actively involving themselves in the campaigns.

(b) shall prohibit employees and officials who serve at thepleasure of the candidate, and shall discourage other employees andofficials subject to the candidate's direction and control, from doing onthe candidate's behalf what the candidate is prohibited from doingunder the Sections of this Canon;

(c) except to the extent permitted by Section 5C(2), shall notauthorize or knowingly permit any other person to do for the candidatewhat the candidate is prohibited from doing under the Sections of thisCanon;

(d) shall not:

(i) make pledges or promises of conduct in officeother than the faithful and impartial performance of theduties of the office;

30

(ii) make statements that commit or appear tocommit the candidate with respect to cases, controversiesor issues that are likely to come before the court; or

(iii) knowingly misrepresent the identity,qualifications, present position or other fact concerningthe candidate or an opponent;

Commentary

Section 5A(3)(d)(i) prohibits a candidate for judicial office makingpledges or promises to decide cases in any particular way and statementscommitting the candidate with respect to cases, controversies or issues likelyto come before the court on which the candidate will serve if elected. Thissection does not prohibit or limit a candidate’s freedom to announce thecandidate’s current views on issues so long as the announcement does not bindthe candidate to maintain those views after election. See Republican Party ofMinn. v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002) (declaring unconstitutional restrictionsin the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct on the announcement of views onlegal and political issues.) The comparable offending language, referred toas the “announce clause”, formerly appeared in our Code of JudicialConduct, but was removed with the revision of the code on April 4, 2002. This Section does not prohibit an incumbent judge from making privatestatements to other judges or court personnel in the performance of judicialduties.

Section 5A(3)(d)(ii) prohibits a candidate for judicial office makingstatements that appear to commit the candidate regarding cases, controversiesor issues likely to come before the court. As a corollary, a candidate shouldemphasize in any public statement the candidate's duty to uphold the lawregardless of the candidate’s personal views. See also Section 3B(9), thegeneral rule on public comment by judges. Section 5A(3)(d) does not prohibita candidate from making pledges and promises respecting improvements incourt administration.

Section 5A(3)(d) applies to any statement made in the process ofsecuring judicial office, such as statements to commissions charged withjudicial selection and tenure and legislative bodies confirming appointment.See also Rule 8.2 of the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct. Phrasessuch as “tough on crime,” “soft on crime,” “pro-business,” “anti-business,”“pro-life,” “pro-choice,” or in any similar characterizations suggestingpersonal views on issues which may come before the courts, when applied to

31

the candidate or an opponent, may be considered to be prohibited by Section5A(3)(d) only when used in a context which contain a pledge or promise todecide cases in a particular manner.

[Commentary amended effective February 26, 2004.]

(e) may respond to personal attacks or attacks on the candidate's recordas long as the response does not violate Section 5A(3)(d).

B. Candidates Seeking Appointment to Judicial or Other Governmental Office.

(1) Candidates for appointment to judicial office or judges seeking othergovernmental office shall not solicit or accept funds, personally or through a committeeor otherwise, to support their candidacies.

(2) A candidate for appointment to judicial office or a judge seeking othergovernmental office shall not engage in any political activity to secure the appointmentexcept that:

(a) such persons may:

(i) communicate with the appointing authority,including any selection or nominating commission or otheragency designated to screen candidates;

(ii) seek support or endorsement for the appointmentfrom organizations that regularly make recommendationsfor reappointment or appointment to the office, and fromindividuals to the extent requested or required by thosespecified in Section 5B(2)(a); and

(iii) provide to those specified in Sections 5B(2)(a)(i)and 5B(2)(a)(ii) information as to the candidate’squalifications for the office;

(b) a non-judge candidate for appointment to judicial office may,in addition, unless otherwise prohibited by law:

(i) retain an office in a political organization,

(ii) attend political gatherings, and

32

(iii) continue to pay ordinary assessments andordinary contributions to a political organization orcandidate and purchase tickets for political party dinners orother political functions.

Commentary

Section 5B(2) provides a limited exception to the restrictions imposed by Sections5A(1) and 5D. Under Section 5B(2), candidates seeking reappointment to the same judicialoffice or appointment to another judicial office or other governmental office may apply forthe appointment and seek appropriate support.

Although under Section 5B(2) non-judge candidates seeking appointment to judicialoffice are permitted during candidacy to retain office in a political organization, attendpolitical gatherings and pay ordinary dues and assessments, they remain subject to otherprovisions of this Code during candidacy. See Sections 5B(1), 5B(2)(a), 5E and ApplicationSection.

C. Judges and Candidates Subject to Public Election.

(1) Judges holding an office filled by public election between competingcandidates, or candidates for such office, may, only insofar as permitted by law, attendpolitical gatherings, speak to such gatherings in their own behalf while candidates forelection or re-election, identify themselves as members of political parties, andcontribute to political parties or organizations.

Commentary

Section 5C recognizes the distinction between appropriate political activities byjudges and candidates subject to non-partisan election and those subject to partisanelections. The language of Section 5C differs from that of corresponding provisions in theABA Model Code, Sections C(1)(a)(ii) and (iii), in recognition of Mississippi’s non-partisanelections for certain positions. Furthermore, Section 23-15-973 et seq., Miss. Code Ann.(1972) imposes restrictions on candidates and political organizations to assure the non-partisan quality of judicial elections for Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Chancery Court,Circuit Court and County Court justices and judges. Section 5C(1) permits judges subjectto election at any time to be involved in limited political activity. Section 5D, applicablesolely to incumbent judges, would otherwise bar this activity. Section 5C(1)(b)(iv) of theABA Mode Code has not been incorporated. Attending or speaking at a political partygathering in the judge’s own behalf while a candidate does not constitute alignments oraffiliation with the party sponsoring the gathering.

33

(2) A candidate shall not personally solicit or accept campaign contributions orpersonally solicit publicly stated support. A candidate may, however, establishcommittees of responsible persons to conduct campaigns for the candidate throughmedia advertisements, brochures, mailings, candidate forums and other means notprohibited by law. Such committees may solicit and accept reasonable campaigncontributions, manage the expenditure of funds for the candidate's campaign andobtain public statements of support for the candidacy. Such committees are notprohibited from soliciting and accepting reasonable campaign contributions and publicsupport from lawyers. A candidate's committees shall not solicit or accept contributions and public support for the candidate's campaign earlier than 60 daysbefore the qualifying deadline or later than 120 days after the last election in which thecandidate participates during the election year. A candidate shall not use or permit theuse of campaign contributions for the private benefit of the candidate or others.

Commentary

There is legitimate concern about a judge's impartiality when parties whose interestsmay come before a judge, or the lawyers who represent such parties, are known to havemade contributions to the election campaigns of judicial candidates. Section 5C(2)recognizes that in many jurisdictions judicial candidates must raise funds to support theircandidacies for election to judicial office. It therefore permits a candidate, other than acandidate for appointment, to establish campaign committees to solicit and accept publicsupport and financial contributions. Though not prohibited, campaign contributions of whicha judge has knowledge, made by lawyers or others who appear before the judge, may, byvirtue of their size or source, raise questions about a judge's impartiality and be cause fordisqualification as provided under Section 3E.

Campaign committees established under Section 5C(2) should manage campaignfinances responsibly, avoiding deficits that might necessitate post-election fund-raising, tothe extent possible. Such committees must at all times comply with applicable statutoryprovisions governing their conduct.

Section 5C(2) does not prohibit a candidate from initiating an evaluation by a judicialselection commission or bar association, or, subject to the requirements of this Code, fromresponding to a request for information from any organization.

(3) Candidates shall instruct their campaign committees at the start of thecampaign not to accept campaign contributions for any election that exceed thoselimitations placed on contributions by individuals, political action committees andcorporations by law.

34

Commentary

The ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct is drafted for the insertion of specific limitson contributions for judicial campaigns. As adopted for Mississippi, this section simplymakes references to limits established by the Legislature by statutes which limit contributionsto $5,000 in appellate court races, to $2,500 in chancery, circuit or county court races, andgenerally limits corporate contributions to $1,000. See Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-1021 (2000Supp.) (judicial races) and Miss. Code Ann. § 97-13-15 (1999 Supp.) (corporatecontributions.)

(4) A candidate and the candidate’s committee shall timely comply with allprovisions of law requiring the disclosure and reporting of contributions, loans andextensions of credit.

Commentary

Section 5C(4) of the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct which makes specialprovision for reporting campaign contributions is replaced by the foregoing Section 5C(4)which requires compliance with all provisions of law. See Miss. Code Ann. §§ 23-15-805and 23-15-1023 (2000 Supp.)

The ABA Model Code includes a Section 5C(5) which approves, under somecircumstances, a judicial candidate’s name being listed on election materials along with thenames of other candidates. This has not been incorporated in the revision of the Mississippicanons.

D. Incumbent Judges. A judge shall not engage in any political activity except asauthorized under any other Section of this Code, on behalf of measures to improve thelaw, the legal system or the administration of justice, or as expressly authorized by law.

Commentary

Neither Section 5D nor any other section of the Code prohibits a judge in the exerciseof administrative functions from engaging in planning and other official activities withmembers of the executive and legislative branches of government. With respect to a judge'sactivity on behalf of measures to improve the law, the legal system and the administrationof justice, see Commentary to Section 4B and Section 4C(1) and its Commentary.

Sections 5A through 5D limit the participation of judges and candidates in politicalactivities. Section 5D expressly prohibits judges from engaging “in any political activity”not expressly authorized by the Code of Judicial Conduct or by law. These provisions do notprohibit voting in party primaries and general elections, which is not “political activity” asthe phrase is used in Canon 5. The statute governing non-partisan judicial elections, while

35

prohibiting candidates for judicial offices covered by the statute from campaigning orqualifying for the offices based on party affiliation, does not preclude the candidates fromvoting in party primaries. Miss. Code Ann. § 23-25-973 (Supp. 2000.)

E. Applicability. Canon 5 generally applies to all incumbent judges and judicialcandidates. Successful candidates, whether or not incumbents, are subject to judicialdiscipline for their campaign conduct; unsuccessful candidates who are lawyers aresubject to lawyer discipline for their campaign conduct. Lawyers who are candidatesfor judicial office are subject to Rule 8.2(b) of the Mississippi Rules of ProfessionalConduct. However, the provisions of Canon 5F below shall not apply to elections forthe offices of justice court judge and municipal judge.

F. Special Committee--Proceedings and Authority. In every year in which anelection is held for Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, chancery court, circuit court orcounty court judge in this state and at such other times as the Supreme Court maydeem appropriate, a Special Committee on Judicial Election Campaign Intervention("Special Committee") shall be created whose responsibility shall be to issue advisoryopinions and to deal expeditiously with allegations of ethical misconduct in campaignsfor judicial office. The committee shall consist of five (5) members. The Chief Justiceof the Supreme Court; the senior justices of Supreme Court Districts 1, 2, and 3,excluding the Chief Justice; and the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals, shall eachappoint one member. All members shall be attorneys licensed to practice in the state. No person shall be appointed to serve as a member of a Special Committee for the yearin which such person is a candidate for judicial office. Should the Chief Justice of theSupreme Court expect to be a candidate for judicial office during the year for whicha Special Committee is to be appointed the Chief Justice shall declare such expectation,and in such event, the appointment which otherwise would have been made by theChief Justice shall be made by the next senior justice of the Supreme Court who is nototherwise charged with appointing authority under this Canon and not seeking judicialoffice in such year. Should a senior justice of Supreme Court Districts 1, 2, or 3,excluding the Chief Justice, expect to be a candidate for judicial office during such ayear, the next senior justice of the same Supreme Court District who is not otherwisecharged with appointing authority and is not seeking judicial office shall make theappointment. Likewise, should the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals expect to be acandidate for judicial office during such a year, the next senior judge of the Court ofAppeals who is not seeking judicial office shall make the appointment. Any actiontaken by the Special Committee shall require a majority vote. Each Special Committeeshall be appointed no later than February 1 in the year of their service, and it shallcontinue in existence for ninety (90) days following such judicial elections or for so longthereafter as is necessary to consider matters submitted to it within such time. TheCommission shall provide administrative support to the Special Committee. Shouldany appointing authority fail to make an appointment, three members shall constitutea sufficient number to conduct the business of the Special Committee. The objective of

36

the Special Committee shall be to alleviate unethical and unfair campaign practices injudicial elections, and to that end, the Special Committee shall have the followingauthority:

(1) Within ten (10) days of the effective date of this rule or within the ten (10)days after formally announcing and/or officially qualifying for election or re-electionto any judicial office in this state, whichever is later, all candidates, includingincumbent judges, shall forward written notice of such candidacy, together with anappropriate mailing address and telephone number, to the Commission. Upon receiptof such notice, the Special Committee shall, through the Commission, cause to bedistributed to all such candidates by certified mail-return receipt requested copies ofthe following: Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct; summaries of any previousopinions issued by the Special Committee, Special Committees organized for priorelections, or the Supreme Court of Mississippi, which relate in any way to campaignconduct and practices; and a form acknowledgment, which each candidate shallpromptly return to the Commission and therein certify that the candidate has read andunderstands the materials forwarded and agrees to be bound by such standards duringthe course of the campaign. A failure to comply with this section shall constitute a perse violation of this Section authorizing the Committee to immediately publicize suchfailure to all candidates in such race and to all appropriate media outlets. In the eventof a question relating to conduct during a judicial campaign, judicial candidates, theircampaign organizations, and all independent persons, committees and organizations areencouraged to seek an opinion from the Special Committee before such conduct occurs.

(2) Opinions as to the propriety of any act or conduct by a judicial candidate, acandidate's campaign organization or an independent person, committee ororganization conducting activities which impact on the election and as to theconstruction or application of Canon 5 may be provided by the Special Committee uponrequest from any judicial candidate, campaign organization or an independent person,committee or organization. If the Special Committee finds the question of limitedsignificance, it may provide an informal opinion to the questioner. If, however, it findsthe questions of sufficient general interest and importance, it may render a formalopinion, in which event it shall cause the opinion to be published in complete orsynopsis form. Furthermore, the Special Committee may issue formal opinions on itsown motion under such circumstances, as it finds appropriate. The Special Committeemay decline to issue an opinion when a majority of the Special Committee membersdetermine that it would be inadvisable to respond to the request and to have soconfirmed in writing their reasoning to the person who requested the opinion. Allformal opinions of the Special Committee shall be filed with the Supreme Court andshall be a matter of public record except for the names of the persons involved, whichshall be excised. Both formal and informal opinions shall be advisory only; however,the Commission on Judicial Performance, the Supreme Court and all other regulatory

37

and enforcement authorities shall consider reliance by a judicial candidate upon theSpecial Committee opinion in any disciplinary or enforcement proceeding.

(3) Upon receipt of a written allegation indicating a violation by a judicialcandidate of any provision of Canon 5 during the course of a campaign for judicialoffice, or indicating actions by any person(s), committee(s) or organization(s) which arecontrary to the limitations placed upon candidates by Canon 5, the Commission staffshall immediately forward a copy of the allegation by e-mail, and U.S. mail to theSpecial Committee members and the judicial candidate, and said Committee shall:

(a) in a manner which comports with due process, provide thecandidate with a list of provisions he or she is accused of violating, andprovide the candidate an opportunity to respond;

(b) seek, from the informing party and/or the subject of theinformation, such further information on the allegations as it deemsnecessary;

(c) conduct such additional investigation as the Committee maydeem necessary;

(d) determine whether the allegations warrant speedy interventionand, if so, immediately issue a confidential cease-and-desist request to thecandidate and/or organization or independent committee or organizationbelieved to be engaging in unethical and/or unfair campaign practices. Ifthe Committee determines that the unethical and/or unfair campaignpractice is of a serious and damaging nature, the Committee may, in itsdiscretion, disregard the issuance of a cease-and-desist request andimmediately take action authorized by the provisions of paragraph(3)(e)(i) and (ii), hereafter described. If the allegations of the complaintdo not warrant intervention, the Committee shall dismiss the same and sonotify the complaining party.

(e) If a cease-and-desist request is disregarded or if the unethical orunfair campaign practices otherwise continue, the Committee is furtherauthorized:

(i) to immediately release to all appropriate mediaoutlets, as well as the reporting party and the person and/ororganization against whom the information is submitted, apublic statement setting out the violations believed to exist,or, in the case of independent persons, committees ororganizations, the actions by an independent person,

38

committee or organization which are contrary to thelimitations placed upon candidates by Canon 5. In the eventthat the violations or actions have continued after theimposition of the cease and desist request, the media releaseshall also include a statement that the candidate and/ororganization or independent person, committee ororganization has failed to honor the cease-and-desistrequest, and

(ii) to refer the matter to the Commission on JudicialPerformance or to any other appropriate regulatory orenforcement authority for such action as may beappropriate under the applicable rules.

(4) All proceedings under this Rule shall be informal and non-adversarial, andthe Special Committee shall act on all requests within ten (10) days of receipt, eitherin person, by facsimile, by U.S. mail, or by telephone. In any event, the SpecialCommittee shall act as soon as possible taking into consideration the exigencies of thecircumstances and, as to requests received during the last ten (10) days of the campaign,shall act within thirty-six (36) hours.

(5) Except as herein specifically authorized, the proceedings of the SpecialCommittee shall remain confidential, and in no event shall the Special Committee havethe authority to institute disciplinary action against any candidate for judicial office,which power is specifically reserved to the Commission on Judicial Performance underapplicable rules.

(6) The Committee shall after conclusion of the election distribute to the Commission on Judicial Performance copies of all information and all proceedingsrelating thereto.

(7) This Canon 5F shall apply to all candidates for judicial offices of theSupreme Court, Court of Appeals, chancery courts, circuit courts and county courts, be they incumbent judges or not, and to the families and campaign/solicitationcommittees of all such candidates. Persons who seek to have their name placed on theballot as candidates for such judicial offices and the judicial candidates’ electioncommittee chairpersons, or the chairperson’s designee, shall no later than 20 days afterthe qualifying date for candidates in the year in which they seek to run complete atwo-hour course on campaign practices, finance, and ethics sponsored and approvedby the Committee. Within ten days of completing the course, candidates shall certify

39

to Committee that they have completed the course and understand fully therequirements of Mississippi law and the Code of Judicial Conduct concerning campaign

40

practices for judicial office. Candidates without opposition are exempt from attendingthe course.

Commentary

Provision is made for the Special Committee to issue opinions to judicial candidates. Ordinarily, absent extraordinary circumstances or statutory authority to the contrary, whena judge or candidate, relying on the opinion of the Special Committee, acts in accordancewith the opinion and the opinion is based on a full disclosure of facts and circumstances, thejudge or candidate will not be subject to disciplinary or enforcement action or liability.

APPLICATION OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

A. Parties Affected. Anyone, whether or not a lawyer, who is an officer of ajudicial system and who performs judicial functions, including an officer such as amagistrate, court commissioner, special master or referee, is a judge within the meaningof this Code. All judges shall comply with this Code except as provided below.

B. Part-time Judge. A part time judge shall not be subject to the restrictions andlimitations of Sections 4C, 4D(2), 4F, and 4G, except as regards practice in the court inwhich the part-time judge serves [prohibition on practice of law], and 4H(1).

C. Special Judge. A special judge shall not, except while serving as a judge, besubject to the restrictions and limitations of Sections 4A. A special judge shall not, atany time be subject to the restrictions and limitations of Sections, 4B, 4D, 4E, 4F, 4G,and 4H. A special judge, except while serving as a special judge or while a candidatefor judicial office, shall not be subject to the restrictions of Canon 5.

D. Magistrates, court commissioners, special masters and referees shall not atany time be subject to the restrictions and limitations of Sections 4A, 4B, 4C(1), 4C(2)4D, 4E, 4F, 4G, and 4H. Magistrates, court commissioners, special masters andreferees, except while a candidate for judicial office, shall not be subject to therestrictions of Canon 5.

E. Time for Compliance. A person to whom this Code becomes applicable shallcomply immediately with all provisions of this Code except Sections 4D(1), 4D(2) and4E and shall comply with those Sections as soon as reasonably possible and shall do soin any event within the period of one year.

F. Effective Date. The separate provisions of this Code shall govern acts, eventsand conduct of those subject to those provisions from and after the effective date of theadoption of each such provision. Acts, events and conduct which occur prior to the

41

adoption of each provision shall be governed by the provisions of the Code effective atthe time of such acts, events and conduct.

Commentary

The ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct provides for several non-standardcategories of judges who perform duties on a limited basis, which differ from thoserecognized for Mississippi by this Applications Section. If serving as a fiduciary whenselected as judge, a new judge may, notwithstanding the prohibitions in Section 4E, continueto serve as a fiduciary but only for that period of time necessary to avoid serious adverseconsequences to the beneficiary of the fiduciary relationship and in no event longer than oneyear. Similarly, if engaged at the time of judicial selection in a business activity, a new judgemay, notwithstanding the prohibitions in Section 4D(2), continue in that activity for areasonable period but in no event longer than one year.