16
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 20, No. 10 (2010) 3193–3208 c World Scientific Publishing Company DOI: 10.1142/S0218127410027623 COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT NONLINEAR WAVE SOLUTIONS FOR GENERALIZED b-EQUATION* RUI LIU Department of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China [email protected] Received December 23, 2009; Revised January 11, 2010 In this paper, we consider the generalized b-equation u t u xxt +(b + 1)u 2 u x = bu x u xx + u xxx . For a given constant wave speed, we investigate the coexistence of multifarious exact nonlinear wave solutions including smooth solitary wave solution, peakon wave solution, smooth periodic wave solution, single singular wave solution and periodic singular wave solution. Not only is the coexistence shown, but the concrete expressions are given via phase analysis and special integrals. From our work, it can be seen that the types of exact nonlinear wave solutions of the generalized b-equation are more than that of the b-equation. Many previous results are turned to our special cases. Also, some conjectures and questions are presented. Keywords : Generalized b-equation; phase analysis; special integrals; coexistence of multifarious exact solutions. 1. Introduction In 2002, Degasperis et al. [2002a, 2002b] introduced a type of nonlinear partial differential equation u t u xxt +(b + 1)uu x = bu x u xx + uu xxx , (1) which is called the b-equation. When b = 2, the b-equation becomes the CH equation. Camassa and Holm [1993] showed that the CH equation is inte- grable and has peaked solitons. Cooper and Shep- ard [1994] derived an approximate solitary wave solution of the CH equation by using some varia- tional functions. Constantin [1997], Constantin and Strauss [2000] gave the mathematical description of the existence of interacting solitary waves and showed that the peakons are stable for the CH equation. Boyd [1997] derived a perturbation series which converges even at the peakon limit, and gave three analytical representations for the spatially periodic generalization of the peakon which is called “the coshoidal wave” in the CH equation. Recently, the CH equation has been studied successively by many authors (e.g. [Johnson, 2002; Lenells, 2002; Liu et al. 2004, 2006; Reyes, 2002]). When b = 3, the b-equation becomes the DP equation which was given by Degasperis and Procesi [1999]. Lundmark and Szmigielski [2003, 2005] pre- sented an inverse scattering approach for computing the n-peakon solutions of the DP equation and gave the concrete expressions of the 3-peakon solutions. Chen and Tang [2006] showed that the DP equation has kink-like waves. The solutions of the b-equation were studied numerically for various values of b by Holm and Staley [2003]. For arbitrary b> 1, Guo and Liu [2005] showed that Eq. (1) has periodic cusp waves Research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10871073). 3193

COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China [email protected] Received December 23, 2009; Revised

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 20, No. 10 (2010) 3193–3208c© World Scientific Publishing CompanyDOI: 10.1142/S0218127410027623

COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACTNONLINEAR WAVE SOLUTIONS

FOR GENERALIZED b-EQUATION*

RUI LIUDepartment of Mathematics,

South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China

[email protected]

Received December 23, 2009; Revised January 11, 2010

In this paper, we consider the generalized b-equation ut − uxxt + (b + 1)u2ux = buxuxx + uxxx.For a given constant wave speed, we investigate the coexistence of multifarious exact nonlinearwave solutions including smooth solitary wave solution, peakon wave solution, smooth periodicwave solution, single singular wave solution and periodic singular wave solution. Not only isthe coexistence shown, but the concrete expressions are given via phase analysis and specialintegrals. From our work, it can be seen that the types of exact nonlinear wave solutions of thegeneralized b-equation are more than that of the b-equation. Many previous results are turnedto our special cases. Also, some conjectures and questions are presented.

Keywords : Generalized b-equation; phase analysis; special integrals; coexistence of multifariousexact solutions.

1. Introduction

In 2002, Degasperis et al. [2002a, 2002b] introduceda type of nonlinear partial differential equation

ut − uxxt + (b + 1)uux = buxuxx + uuxxx, (1)

which is called the b-equation. When b = 2, theb-equation becomes the CH equation. Camassa andHolm [1993] showed that the CH equation is inte-grable and has peaked solitons. Cooper and Shep-ard [1994] derived an approximate solitary wavesolution of the CH equation by using some varia-tional functions. Constantin [1997], Constantin andStrauss [2000] gave the mathematical descriptionof the existence of interacting solitary waves andshowed that the peakons are stable for the CHequation. Boyd [1997] derived a perturbation serieswhich converges even at the peakon limit, and gave

three analytical representations for the spatiallyperiodic generalization of the peakon which is called“the coshoidal wave” in the CH equation. Recently,the CH equation has been studied successively bymany authors (e.g. [Johnson, 2002; Lenells, 2002;Liu et al. 2004, 2006; Reyes, 2002]).

When b = 3, the b-equation becomes the DPequation which was given by Degasperis and Procesi[1999]. Lundmark and Szmigielski [2003, 2005] pre-sented an inverse scattering approach for computingthe n-peakon solutions of the DP equation and gavethe concrete expressions of the 3-peakon solutions.Chen and Tang [2006] showed that the DP equationhas kink-like waves.

The solutions of the b-equation were studiednumerically for various values of b by Holm andStaley [2003]. For arbitrary b > 1, Guo and Liu[2005] showed that Eq. (1) has periodic cusp waves

∗Research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10871073).

3193

Page 2: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3194 R. Liu

and constructed their presentations. Guha [2007]proposed an Euler–Poincare formalism of the DPequation.

To study the bifurcation of the peakon waves,Liu and Qian [2001] suggested a generalized CHequation

ut − uxxt + 3u2ux = 2uxuxx + uuxxx. (2)

Similarly, to investigate the change of peakonwaves, Wazwaz [2006, 2007] proposed a generalizedDP equation

ut − uxxt + 4u2ux = 3uxuxx + uuxxx (3)

and a generalized b-equation

ut − uxxt + (b + 1)u2ux = buxuxx + uuxxx. (4)

Since the CH and the DP equations possessrich structure and properties, many authors wereinterested in their modified forms, Eqs. (2)–(4).Tian and Song [2004] gave some physical expla-nation for Eq. (2). Shen and Xu [2005] discussedthe existence of smooth and nonsmooth travelingwaves for Eq. (2). Letting c denote the constantwave speed of traveling waves, for some special val-ues of c, the exact traveling wave solutions werestudied for Eqs. (2) and (3). When c = 1, Khuri[2005] obtained a singular wave solution composedof triangle functions for Eq. (2). When c = 1 andc = 2 respectively, Wazwaz [2007] obtained elevenexact traveling wave solutions composed of trian-gle functions or hyperbolic functions for Eq. (2),and Liu and Ouyang [2007] got a peakon solutioncomposed of hyperbolic functions for Eq. (2). Heet al. [2008a] used the integral bifurcation methodto obtain some exact solutions for Eq. (2). Liuand Guo [2008] investigated the periodic blow-upsolutions and their limit forms for Eq. (2). Whenc = 5/2, Wazwaz [2007] obtained nine exact travel-ing wave solutions composed of hyperbolic functionsfor Eq. (3). Besides, Liu and Ouyang [2007] got apeakon solution composed of hyperbolic functionsfor Eq. (3). Zhang et al. [2007] used the bifurca-tion theory of dynamical systems to show the exis-tence of some traveling waves for Eq. (2). Wang andTang [2008] obtained two exact solutions for Eq. (2)when c = 1/3 and c = 3 respectively, and gave twoexact solutions for Eq. (3) when c = 1/4 and c = 4,respectively. Yomba [2008a, 2008b] presented twomethods, the sub-ODE method and the generalizedauxiliary equation method, to find the exact trav-eling wave solutions for Eqs. (2) and (3). He et al.[2008b] used the bifurcation method of dynamical

systems to obtain some exact solutions for Eq. (3).Liu and Pan [2009] studied the coexistence of multi-farious explicit nonlinear wave solutions for Eqs. (2)and (3).

When the wave speed c = (2 + b)/2, Wazwaz[2007] obtained two solitary wave solutions forEq. (4). When c = 1/(1 + b), (2 + b)/2, 1+ b respec-tively, Liu [2010] investigated the solitary wave solu-tion for Eq. (4).

In this paper, we use the phase analysis ofplanar systems and special integrals to study thecoexistence of multifarious exact nonlinear wavesolutions for Eq. (4). We will show that when theconstant wave speed c satisfies 0 < c < b + 1, mul-tifarious exact nonlinear wave solutions coexist forEq. (4). We will also give the concrete expressions ofthese solutions and test their correctness by usingthe software Mathematica. Some previous results(e.g. [He et al., 2008a, 2008b; Khuri, 2005; Liu, 2010;Liu & Guo, 2008; Liu & Ouyang, 2007; Liu & Pan,2009; Shen & Xu, 2005; Tian & Song, 2004; Wang &Tang, 2008; Wazwaz, 2006, 2007; Yomba, 2008a,2008b; Zhang et al., 2007]) become our special cases.

This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2,we state our main results. In Sec. 3, we give somepreliminaries. In Sec. 4, we give the demonstrationsto our main results. A conclusion is given in Sec. 5.

2. Main Results

In this paper, we suppose the parameter b > 1.Under this supposition it follows that

0 <1

1 + b<

4(1 + b)4 + 2b + b2

< 1 + b. (5)

Thus for the constant wave speed c ∈ (0, 1 + b) wehave some results in the following five propositions.

Proposition 1. If the wave speed c satisfies 0 <c < 1+b and c = 1/(1 + b), then four types of exactnonlinear wave solutions coexist for Eq. (4). Theseexact solutions are hyperbolic smooth solitary wavesolution, hyperbolic peakon wave solution, hyperbolicsingular wave solution and trigonometric periodicsingular wave solution respectively. Denote

ξ = x − c t, (6)

p =√

b(2 + b)(1 + b − c)c, (7)

α =√

p

2b(2 + b). (8)

Page 3: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

Coexistence of Multifarious Exact Nonlinear Wave Solutions for Generalized b-Equation 3195

Then the explicit expressions of these solutions are as follows:

(i) The hyperbolic smooth solitary wave solution

u1(ξ, c) =1

b(b + 1)[p − bc − 3p sech2 αξ]. (9)

(ii) The hyperbolic peakon wave solution

u2(ξ, c) =1

b(b + 1)

[p − bc +

3p(2bc + b2c − p)

(√

3p cosh αξ +√

2bc + b2c + 2p sinh|αξ|)2

]. (10)

(iii) The hyperbolic singular wave solution

u3(ξ, c) =1

b(b + 1)(p − bc + 3p csch2αξ).

(11)

(iv) The trigonometric periodic singular wavesolution

u4(ξ, c) =1

b(b + 1)(2p − bc + 3p tan2αξ).

(12)

For the figures of u = ui(ξ, c) (i = 1, 2, 3, 4)with b = 4 and c = 1/2, see Figs. 1(a)–1(d).

Remark 1. Since u4(ξ + π/2, c) is also a solutionof Eq. (4) and 1 + tan2 ξ = csc2ξ, the followingfunctions

u∧4 (ξ, c) =

1b(1 + b)

[2p − bc + 3p cot2αξ], (13)

u∗4(ξ, c) =

1b(1 + b)

[−p − bc + 3p csc2αξ], (14)

and

u⊕4 (ξ, c) =

1b(1 + b)

[−p − bc + 3p sec2αξ] (15)

are the solutions of Eq. (4) too.

Proposition 2. If the wave speed c satisfies 0 <c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) and c = 1/(1 + b), thensix types of exact nonlinear wave solutions coexistfor Eq. (4). These exact solutions are hyperbolicsmooth solitary wave solution u1(ξ, c), hyperbolic

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Fig. 1. The figures of u = ui(ξ, c) (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) with b = 4 and c = 1/2.

Page 4: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3196 R. Liu

peakon wave solution u2(ξ, c), hyperbolic singularwave solution u3(ξ, c), trigonometric periodic sin-gular wave solution u4(ξ, c), elliptic smooth periodicwave solution

u5(ξ, c) =

a1 + a2 sn2(β ξ, k1)

for 0 < c <1

1 + b,

a1 + a3 sn2(γ ξ, k2)

for1

1 + b< c <

4(1 + b)4 + 2b + b2

,

(16)

and elliptic periodic singular wave solution

u6(ξ, c) =

a1 + a3 sn−2(β ξ, k1)

for 0 < c <1

1 + b,

a1 + a2 sn−2(γ ξ, k2)

for1

1 + b< c <

4(1 + b)4 + 2b + b2

,

(17)

where

q =√

3bc(2 + b)(4 + 4b − 4c − 2bc − b2c), (18)

a1 = −bc(4 + b) + q

2b(1 + b), (19)

a2 =3bc(2 + b) + q

2b(1 + b), (20)

a3 =q

b(1 + b), (21)

k1 =3bc(2 + b) + q

2q, (22)

k2 =2q

3bc(2 + b) + q, (23)

β =√

q

6b(2 + b), (24)

and

γ =

√3bc(2 + b) + q

12b(2 + b). (25)

Proposition 3. If the wave speed c = 1/(1 + b),then three types of exact nonlinear wave solutionscoexist for Eq. (4). These solutions are as follows:

(i) Smooth solitary wave solution

u1(x, t) =

11 + b

− 3(2 + b)(1 + b)2

sech2

√1

2(1 + b)

(x − t

1 + b

). (26)

(ii) Hyperbolic singular wave solution

u3(x, t) =

11 + b

+3(2 + b)(1 + b)2

csch2

√1

2(1 + b)

(x − t

1 + b

). (27)

(iii) Trigonometric periodic singular wave solution

u4(x, t) =

1(1 + b)2

[3 + 2b + 3(2 + b) tan2

√1

2(1 + b)

(x − t

1 + b

)]. (28)

Remark 2. The solutions u1(x, t) and u

3(x, t) hadbeen obtained in [Liu, 2010], also the followingresults:

If the wave speed c = 1 + b, then two types ofexact nonlinear wave solutions coexist for Eq. (4).These solutions are peakon wave solution

u7(x, t) =6(2 + b)

(√

6 +√

1 + b |x − (1 + b)t|)2 − 1,

(29)

and singular wave solution

u8(x, t) =6(2 + b)

(1 + b)(x − (1 + b)t)2− 1. (30)

Proposition 4. For these solutions, there are thefollowing relations or properties.

(1) When c tends to 1/(1 + b), it follows that :(i) The hyperbolic smooth solitary wave solution

u1(ξ, c) becomes u1(x, t), that is, the hyperbolic

smooth solitary wave persists.

Page 5: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

Coexistence of Multifarious Exact Nonlinear Wave Solutions for Generalized b-Equation 3197

(ii) The hyperbolic peakon wave solution u2(ξ, c)becomes a constant solution u = 1/(1 + b), thatis, the peakon wave disappears.

(iii) The hyperbolic singular wave solution u3(ξ, c)becomes the hyperbolic singular wave solutionu

3(x, t), that is, the hyperbolic singular wavepersists.

(iv) The elliptic smooth periodic wave solutionu5(ξ, c) becomes the hyperbolic smooth solitarywave solution u

1(x, t). For the varying figureswith b = 4 and c = 0.1, 0.19, 0.1999, 0.2001,0.21, 0.3 respectively, see Figs. 2(a)–2(f ).

(v) The elliptic periodic singular wave solutionu6(ξ, c) becomes the hyperbolic singular wavesolution u

3(x, t). For the varying figures withb = 4 and c = 0.1, 0.19, 0.1999, 0.2001, 0.21,0.3 respectively, see Figs. 3(a)–3(f ).

(vi) The trigonometric periodic singular wave solu-tion u4(ξ, c) becomes the trigonometric peri-odic singular wave solution u

4(x, t), that is, thetrigonometric periodic singular wave persists.

(2) When c tends to 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2), it fol-lows that :

(vii) The smooth periodic wave solution u5(ξ, c)becomes a constant solution u = −2(4 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2).

(viii) The periodic singular wave solution u6(ξ, c)becomes a trigonometric periodic singular

wave solution

u9(x, t) =2δ

[2(1 + b) + 3(2 + b)

× tan2

√1 + b

δ

(x − 4(1 + b)t

δ

)],

(31)

where

δ = 4 + 2b + b2. (32)

(3) When c tends to 1+b, the four solutions ui(ξ, c)(i = 1, 2, 3, 4) become a constant solution u = −1.

Remark 3. Using the software Mathematica, wehave tested the correctness of these solutions. Forinstance, testing u1(ξ, c) with b = 4, the orders areas follows (testing other solutions, the orders arethe same):

b = 4

p =√

b(2 + b)(1 + b − c)c

q =1

b(1 + b)

z =√

p

2b(2 + b)(x − c t)

(a) c = 0.1 (b) c = 0.19 (c) c = 0.1999

(d) c = 0.2001 (e) c = 0.21 (f) c = 0.3

Fig. 2. The varying figures of u5(ξ, c) when b = 4 and c tends to 1/(1 + b) = 0.2.

Page 6: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3198 R. Liu

(a) c = 0.1 (b) c = 0.19 (c) c = 0.1999

(d) c = 0.2001 (e) c = 0.21 (f) c = 0.3

Fig. 3. The varying figures of u6(ξ, c) when b = 4 and c tends to 1/(1 + b) = 0.2.

u1 = q(p − bc − 3 p Sech [z]2)

u = u1

Simplify [D[u, t]−D[D[u, t], x, 2]+(b+1)∗u∗u∗D[u, x]− b ∗D[u, x] ∗D[u, x, 2]− u ∗D[u, x, 3]].

3. Preliminaries

For a given constant c > 0, substituting u = ϕ(ξ)into Eq. (4) with ξ = x − c t, it follows that

−cϕ′ + cϕ′′′ + (1 + b)ϕ2ϕ′ = bϕ′ϕ′′ + ϕϕ′′′. (33)

Integrating (33) once, we have

(ϕ − c)ϕ′′ = g − cϕ +1 + b

3ϕ3 − b − 1

2(ϕ′)2, (34)

where g is the constant of integration.Letting y = ϕ′, it yields the following planar

system

dξ= y,

dy

dξ=

g − cϕ +1 + b

3ϕ3 − b − 1

2y2

ϕ − c.

(35)

By using the transformation dτ = dξ/(ϕ − c),(35) can be written as the planar system

dτ= (ϕ − c)y,

dy

dτ= g − cϕ +

1 + b

3ϕ3 − b − 1

2y2.

(36)

Let

a0 =6g − 6c2 + 2(1 + b)c3

3(b − 1), (37)

a1 =2(1 + b)c2 − 2c

b, (38)

a2 = 2c, (39)

a3 =2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

, (40)

and

H(ϕ, y) = (ϕ − c)b−1[a0 + a1(ϕ − c)

+ a2(ϕ − c)2 + a3(ϕ − c)3 − y2]. (41)

It is easy to check that

H(ϕ, y) = h (42)

is the first integration for both systems (35)and (36). Therefore, both systems (35) and (36)have the same topological phase portraits except

Page 7: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

Coexistence of Multifarious Exact Nonlinear Wave Solutions for Generalized b-Equation 3199

the line ϕ = c. This implies that one can studythe phase portraits of system (35) from that ofsystem (36).

Now we begin to study the bifurcation phaseportraits of system (36). Let

z = f(ϕ), (43)

where

f(ϕ) = g − cϕ +1 + b

3ϕ3. (44)

We have

f ′(ϕ) = (1 + b)ϕ2 − c. (45)

When g = 0, it follows

f

√c

1 + b

)= ∓2c

3

√c

1 + b. (46)

Let

ϕ∗ =

√3c

1 + b, (47)

ϕ0 =√

c

1 + b, (48)

and

g0 =2|c|3

√c

1 + b. (49)

We draw the graph of z = f(ϕ) as in Fig. 4.On the other hand, it is seen that (ϕ, 0) is

a singular point of system (36) if and only iff(ϕ) = 0. At the singular point (ϕ, 0), it is easyto see that the linearized system of (36) has theeigenvalues

λ±(ϕ, 0) = ±√

(ϕ − c)f ′(ϕ). (50)

From (42) and (50) we see that the singularpoint (ϕ, 0) is of the following properties:(i) If (ϕ − c)f ′(ϕ) > 0, then (ϕ, 0) is a saddle

point of system (36).(ii) If (ϕ − c)f ′(ϕ) = 0, then (ϕ, 0) is a degene-

rate saddle point of system (36).(iii) If (ϕ − c)f ′(ϕ) < 0, then (ϕ, 0) is a center

point of system (36).

Let

y0 =2(1 + b)c3 − 6c2 + 6g

3(b − 1). (51)

Similarly, it can be seen that if y0 > 0, then(c,−√

y0) and (c,√

y0) are two saddle points ofsystem (36). According to the analysis above andthe values of H(ϕ, y) at the singular points, weobtain five bifurcation curves:

g1(c) = − 2c√

c

3√

1 + b, (52)

g2(c) =2c(bc(3 + 3b − 3c − bc) − (−1 + c − bc + b2)Ω)

3b2(1 + b)2, (53)

(a) g < −g0 (b) g = −g0 (c) −g0 < g < 0 (d) g = 0

(e) 0 < g < g0 (f) g = g0 (g) g > g0

Fig. 4. The graph of z = f(ϕ).

Page 8: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3200 R. Liu

g3(c) = c2

(1 − 1 + b

3c

), (54)

g4(c) =2c(bc(3 + 3b − 3c − bc) + (−1 + c − bc + b2)Ω)

3b2(1 + b)2, (55)

and

g5(c) =2c√

c

3√

1 + b, (56)

where

Ω =√

b(2 + b)(1 + b − c)c. (57)

On a c–g plane, it is easy to test the followingproperties:

(i) The five curves g = gi(c) (i = 1− 5) intersectat (0, 0).

(ii) The three curves g = gi(c) (i = 3, 4, 5) haveanother intersection (1/(1 + b), 2/(3(1 + b)2)).

(iii) The two curves g = g2(c) and g = g3(c)have another intersection 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b +b2), 16(1 + b)2(8 − 2b − b2)/(3(4 + 2b + b2)3).

(iv) The two curves g = g1(c) and g = g3(c) haveanother intersection (4/(1 + b),−(16/(3(1 +b)2))).

(v) The three curves g = g1(c), g = g2(c) andg = g4(c) have another intersection (1 + b,−2(1 + b)/3).

(vi) When 0 < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) andc = (1/(1 + b)), it follows that

g5(c) > g4(c) > g3(c) > g2(c) > g1(c). (58)

(vii) When 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) < c < 4/(1 + b),it follows that

g5(c) > g4(c) > g2(c) > g3(c) > g1(c). (59)

(viii) When 4/(1 + b) < c < 1 + b, it follows that

g5(c) > g4(c) > g2(c) > g1(c) > g3(c). (60)

(ix) When 1 + b < c < +∞, it follows that

g5(c) > g1(c) > g3(c), (61)

and g2(c), g4(c) have no definition.

From the discussion above, we draw the figuresof g = gi(c) (i = 1 − 5) as in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. The bifurcation curves of systems (35) and (36).

Page 9: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

Coexistence of Multifarious Exact Nonlinear Wave Solutions for Generalized b-Equation 3201

Next, we will study the phase portraits of sys-tem (35) on the curves g = gj(c) (j = 2, 3, 4) anduse some special orbits of the phase portraits toderive our main results.

4. The Derivations for the MainResults

In this section, we will derive our main results onthree bifurcation curves g2(c), g3(c) and g4(c). Ourderivation will be given under the following threecases:

Case 1. 0 < c < 1 + b and g = g2(c).

Case 2. 0 < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) andg = g3(c).

Case 3. 0 < c < 1 + b and g = g4(c).

4.1. The derivations under Case 1

For Case 1, that is, 0 < c < 1+b and g = g2(c), sys-tem (35) has three singular points (ϕ

1, 0), (ϕ−1 , 0)

and (ϕ+1 , 0) where

ϕ1 =

−bc − Ωb(1 + b)

, (62)

ϕ−1 =

bc + Ω −√

3bc(b + 3b2 + 2c − 2 − 2Ω)2b(1 + b)

,

(63)

ϕ+1 =

bc + Ω +√

3bc(b + 3b2 + 2c − 2 − 2Ω)2b(1 + b)

.

(64)

In (42) letting ϕ = c, it follows that h = 0.Thus substituting g = g2(c) into (37) and solvingequation

a3(ϕ − c) + a2(ϕ − c)2 + a1(ϕ − c) + a0 = 0, (65)

we get three roots c, ϕ1 and ϕ

2, where

ϕ2 =

−bc + 2Ωb(1 + b)

. (66)

It is easy to see that ϕ±1 , ϕ

1 and ϕ2 satisfy the

following inequalities:

ϕ1 < ϕ−

1 < c < ϕ+1 < ϕ

2

for 0 < c <4(1 + b)

4 + 2b + b2, (67)

ϕ1 < ϕ−

1 < ϕ+1 = ϕ

2 = c

for c =4(1 + b)

4 + 2b + b2, (68)

and

ϕ1 < ϕ−

1 < ϕ2 < ϕ+

1 < c

for4(1 + b)

4 + 2b + b2< c < 1 + b. (69)

Let Γ(ϕ2) denote the orbit passing through the

point (ϕ2, 0). From Fig. 4, (50) and (67)–(69), we

see that (ϕ1, 0) is a center, (ϕ−

1 , 0) is a saddle, andthe properties of (ϕ+

1 , 0) are as follows:

(i) When 0 < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2), (ϕ+1 , 0)

is a saddle. The phase portrait and the locationof the orbit Γ(ϕ

2) are shown in Fig. 6(a).(ii) When c = 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2), (ϕ+

1 , 0) is adegenerate singular point. The phase portraitand the location of the orbit Γ(ϕ

2) are shownin Fig. 6(b).

(iii) When 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) < c < 1 + b,(ϕ+

1 , 0) is a center. The phase portrait andthe location of the orbit Γ(ϕ

2) are shown inFig. 6(c).

From (42) and the analysis above, on ϕ–y planethe orbit Γ(ϕ

2) has expression

y = ±√

2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

(ϕ − ϕ1)

√ϕ − ϕ

2. (70)

(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 6. The location of the orbit Γ(ϕ2) when 0 < c < 1 + b and g = g2(c), (a) for 0 < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2), (b) for

c = 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2), (c) for 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) < c < 1 + b.

Page 10: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3202 R. Liu

Substituting (70) into the first equation of sys-tem (35), it follows that

(ϕ − ϕ1)

√ϕ − ϕ

2

= ±√

2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

dξ. (71)

Suppose ϕ(0) = +∞. From (71) we have∫ +∞

ϕ

ds

(s − ϕ1)

√s − ϕ

2

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ|. (72)

In (72) completing the integral and solving theequation for ϕ, and noting that u = ϕ(ξ), we obtainthe trigonometric periodic singular wave solutionu4(ξ, c) as (12). Note that our derivation is availablefor c = 1/(1 + b). Thus substituting c = 1/(1 + b)into (12), we get u

4(x, t) as (28).

4.2. The derivations under Case 2

For Case 2, that is, 0 < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 +2b+b2) and g = g3(c), system (35) has three singularpoints (c, 0), (ϕ+

2 , 0) and (ϕ−2 , 0), where

ϕ+2 =

−(1 + b)c +√

3(1 + b)(4 − c − bc)c2(1 + b)

, (73)

and

ϕ−2 =

−(1 + b)c − √3(1 + b)(4 − c − bc)c

2(1 + b). (74)

Clearly, there are the following inequalities

ϕ−2 < c < ϕ+

2 for 0 < c <1

1 + b, (75)

ϕ−2 < c = ϕ+

2 for c =1

1 + b, (76)

and

ϕ−2 < ϕ+

2 < c for1

1 + b< c <

4(1 + b)4 + 2b + b2

. (77)

Note that ϕ = c is the singular line. Therefore,(c, 0) is a degenerate singular point. (ϕ−

2 , 0) is acenter, and (ϕ+

2 , 0) is a saddle when c = 1/(1 + b).When c = 1/(1 + b), the saddle (ϕ+

2 , 0) and thedegenerate singular point (c, 0) coincide. In (42)when ϕ = c, we have h = 0. Therefore, substitut-ing h = 0 and g = g3(c) into (42) and solving theequation H(ϕ, 0) = 0, we get three roots c, ϕ+

3 andϕ−

3 , where

ϕ+3 =

−bc(4 + b) +√

3bc(2 + b)(4 + 4b − 4c − 2bc − b2c)2b(1 + b)

, (78)

and

ϕ−3 =

−bc(4 + b) − √3bc(2 + b)(4 + 4b − 4c − 2bc − b2c)

2b(1 + b). (79)

It is easy to check the following inequalities:

ϕ−3 < ϕ−

2 < c < ϕ+2 < ϕ+

3 for 0 < c <1

1 + b,

(80)

ϕ−3 < ϕ−

2 < c = ϕ+2 = ϕ+

3 for c =1

1 + b, (81)

and

ϕ−3 < ϕ−

2 < ϕ+3 < ϕ+

2 < c

for1

1 + b< c <

4(1 + b)4 + 2b + b2

. (82)

These imply the following information:

(i) When 0 < c < 1/(1 + b), there is a spe-cial closed orbit denoted by Γ1 which passes

through (ϕ−3 , 0) and connects with the degen-

erate singular point (c, 0). And there is anotherspecial orbit denoted by Γ2 which passesthrough (ϕ+

3 , 0) [see Fig. 7(a)].(ii) When c = 1/(1 + b), there is a special

closed orbit denoted by Γ3 which passesthrough (ϕ−

3 , 0) and connects with (c, 0). Andthere are other two orbits denoted by Γ−

4and Γ+

4 which connect with (c, 0), too [seeFig. 7(b)].

(iii) When 1/(1 + b) < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b +b2), there is a special closed orbit denotedby Γ5 which passes through (ϕ−

3 , 0) and(ϕ+

3 , 0). And there are two special orbitsdenoted by Γ±

6 which connect with (c, 0) [seeFig. 7(c)].

Page 11: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

Coexistence of Multifarious Exact Nonlinear Wave Solutions for Generalized b-Equation 3203

(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 7. The graphs of the special orbits when 0 < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) and g = g3(c), (a) for 0 < c < 1/(1 + b), (b) forc = 1/(1 + b), (c) for 1/(1 + b) < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2).

On ϕ–y plane, these special orbits possess thefollowing expressions:

Γ1: y2 =2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

(ϕ+3 − ϕ)(c − ϕ)(ϕ − ϕ−

3 ),

where ϕ−3 ≤ ϕ < c < ϕ+

3 . (83)

Γ2: y2 =2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

(ϕ − ϕ+3 )(ϕ − c)(ϕ − ϕ−

3 ),

where ϕ−3 < c < ϕ+

3 < ϕ. (84)

Γ3: y2 =2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

(c − ϕ)2(ϕ − ϕ−3 ),

where ϕ−3 ≤ ϕ < c. (85)

Γ±4 : y = ±

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

(ϕ − c)√

ϕ − ϕ−3 ,

where ϕ−3 < c < ϕ. (86)

Γ5: y2 =2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

(c − ϕ)(ϕ+3 − ϕ)(ϕ − ϕ−

3 ),

where ϕ−3 < ϕ < ϕ+

3 < c. (87)

Γ±6 : y = ±

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

√(ϕ − c)(ϕ − ϕ+

3 )(ϕ − ϕ−3 ),

where ϕ−3 < ϕ+

3 < c < ϕ.

(88)

Substituting these expressions into the firstequation of system (35) and integrating themrespectively, it yields that∫ ϕ

ϕ−3

ds√(ϕ+

3 − s)(c − s)(s − ϕ−3 )

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbit Γ1), (89)

where 0 < c < 1/(1 + b) and ϕ−3 < ϕ ≤ c < ϕ+

3 .∫ ∞

ϕ

ds√(s − ϕ+

3 )(s − c)(s − ϕ−3 )

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbit Γ2), (90)

where 0 < c < 1/(1 + b) and ϕ−3 < c < ϕ+

3 ≤ϕ < ∞.∫ ϕ

ϕ−3

ds

(c − s)√

(s − ϕ−3 )

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbit Γ3), (91)

and∫ ∞

ϕ

ds

(s − c)√

(s − ϕ−3 )

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbit Γ±4 ), (92)

where c = 1/(1 + b).∫ ϕ

ϕ−3

ds√(c − s)(ϕ+

3 − s)(s − ϕ−3 )

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbit Γ5), (93)

where 1/(1 + b) < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) andϕ−

3 < ϕ ≤ ϕ+3 < c.∫ ∞

ϕ

ds√(s − c)(s − ϕ+

3 )(s − ϕ−3 )

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbit Γ±6 ), (94)

Page 12: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3204 R. Liu

where 1/(1 + b) < c < 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2) andϕ−

3 < ϕ+3 < c ≤ ϕ < ∞.

In (89) and (93) completing the integrals andsolving the equations for ϕ, and noting that u =ϕ(ξ), we get the elliptic smooth periodic wave solu-tion u5(ξ, c) given as (16).

Similarly, via (90) and (94), we obtain the ellip-tic periodic singular wave solution u6(ξ, c) givenas (17). Via (91) we get the smooth solitary wavesolution u

1(x, t) given as (26). Via (92) we getthe hyperbolic singular wave solution u

3(x, t) givenas (27).

4.3. The derivations under Case 3

Case 3, that is, 0 < c < 1 + b, and g = g4(c),system (35) has three singular points (ϕ+

4 , 0),(ϕ

3, 0) and (ϕ−4 , 0), where

ϕ±4 =

bc − Ω ± √3bc(b + 3b2 − 2 + 2c + 2Ω)

2b(1 + b)

and

ϕ3 =

Ω − 3bcb(1 + b)

.

It is easy to check that ϕ+4 , ϕ

3 and ϕ−4 satisfy

the following inequalities

ϕ−4 < c < ϕ+

4 < ϕ3 for 0 < c <

11 + b

, (95)

ϕ−4 < ϕ

3 = ϕ+4 = c for c =

11 + b

, (96)

and

ϕ−4 < ϕ

3 < ϕ+4 < c for

11 + b

< c < 1 + b. (97)

From Fig. 4, (50) and (95)–(97) we see thefollowing facts:

(i) When 0 < c < 1 + b and c = 1/(1 + b), (ϕ−4 , 0)

and (ϕ+4 , 0) are two centers. (ϕ

3, 0) is a saddle.(ii) When c = 1/(1 + b), the center (ϕ−

4 , 0) and thesaddle (ϕ

3, 0) persist. The center (ϕ+4 , 0) disap-

pears. Let

ϕ4 = − bc + 2Ω

b(1 + b), (98)

and

y∗0 =

√2c[(2 + b)(−c − 3b + 3c + 2bc + b2c)bc + 2(1 + b − c)Ω]√

3b(1 + b). (99)

Assume that (ϕ0, 0) is an initial point of system(35). We discuss some special orbits as follows.

(1) When the wave speed c satisfies 0 < c <1/(1 + b), we have:

(i) If ϕ−4 < ϕ0 < c, then the orbit passing (ϕ0, 0)

is a periodic orbit. As ϕ0 → c − 0, the peri-odic orbit tends to a closed orbit denoted byΓ7 which is composed of a line segment ϕ = c

and an arc connecting the three points (ϕ4, 0),

(c,−y∗0) and (c, y∗0) [see Fig. 8(a)].(ii) If c < ϕ0 < ϕ+

4 , then the orbit passing (ϕ0, 0)is a periodic orbit. As ϕ0 → c + 0, the peri-odic orbit tends to a closed orbit denoted byΓ8 which is composed of a line segment ϕ = cand an arc connecting the three points (ϕ

3, 0),(0, y∗0) and (0,−y∗0) [see Fig. 8(b)].

(iii) If ϕ0 = ϕ3, then there are three orbits con-

necting to the point (ϕ3, 0). These orbits are

(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 8. The graphs of the orbits Γi (i = 7 − 9), Γ+10, and Γ−

10 when 0 < c < 1/(1 + b) and g = g4(c). (a) The limit orbit Γ7

of the periodic orbit passing (ϕ0, 0) when ϕ−4 < ϕ0 < c and ϕ0 → c − 0. (b) The limit orbit Γ8 of the periodic orbit passing

through (ϕ0, 0) when c < ϕ0 < ϕ+4 and ϕ0 → c + 0. (c) The orbits Γ9, Γ+

10 and Γ−10 connecting to (ϕ

3, 0).

Page 13: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

Coexistence of Multifarious Exact Nonlinear Wave Solutions for Generalized b-Equation 3205

the homoclinic orbit denoted by Γ9, the he-teroclinic orbits denoted by Γ+

10 and Γ−10 respec-

tively [see Fig. 8(c)].

(2) When the wave speed c satisfies 1/(1 + b) < c <1 + b, we have:

(i) If ϕ−4 < ϕ0 < ϕ

3, then the orbit passingthrough (ϕ0, 0) is a periodic orbit. When ϕ0 →ϕ

3 − 0, the periodic orbit tends to a closedorbit denoted by Γ11 which connects with twopoints (ϕ

3, 0) and (ϕ4, 0) [see Fig. 9(a)].

(ii) If ϕ3 < ϕ0 < ϕ+

4 , then the orbit passing (ϕ0, 0)is a periodic orbit. When ϕ0 → ϕ

3 + 0, theperiodic orbit tends to a closed orbit denotedby Γ12 which is composed of a line segmentϕ = c and an arc connecting the three points(ϕ

3, 0), (c, y∗0) and (c,−y∗0) [see Fig. 9(b)].(iii) If ϕ0 = ϕ

3, then there are four orbits connect-ing to the point (ϕ

3, 0). These orbits are thehomoclinic orbits Γ11 and Γ12, the heteroclinicorbits denoted by Γ+

13 and Γ−13 respectively [see

Fig. 9(c)].

From Figs. 8 and 9 we see that these orbits pos-sess the same expression

y2 =2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

(ϕ − ϕ3)

2(ϕ − ϕ4) (100)

except the definition intervals.Substituting (100) into the first equation of sys-

tem (35) and respectively integrating it along theseorbits above, it follows that∫ ϕ

ϕ4

ds

(ϕ3 − s)

√s − ϕ

4

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbits Γ9 or Γ11),

(101)

∫ c

ϕ

ds

(s − ϕ3)

√s − ϕ

4

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbits Γ8 or Γ12),

(102)

and∫ +∞

ϕ

ds

(s − ϕ3)

√s − ϕ

4

=

√2(1 + b)3(2 + b)

|ξ| (along the orbits Γ±10 or Γ±

13).

(103)

From (101) we get the hyperbolic smooth soli-tary wave solution u1(ξ, c) given as (9). Via (102) weobtain the hyperbolic peakon wave solution u2(ξ, c)as (10). Via (103) we have the hyperbolic singularwave solution u3(ξ, c) as (11).

In Secs. 4.1–4.3, we have given derivations forthe solutions ui(ξ, c) (i = 1 − 6) and u

1(x, t),u

2(x, t), u4(x, t). Also we have tested their cor-

rectness by using the software Mathematica (seeRemark 3). Hence, we have completed the proof forPropositions 1–3. Next we will prove Proposition 4.

4.4. The proof of Proposition 4

Now we prove Proposition 4. Firstly, when c →1/(1 + b), it follows that

p → b(2 + b)1 + b

, (104)

α → 1√2(1 + b)

, (105)

2bc + b2c − p → 0, (106)

(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 9. The graphs of the orbits Γi (i = 11, 12), and Γ+13, Γ−

13 when 1/(1 + b) < c < 1 + b and g = g4(c). (a) The limit orbit

Γ11 of the periodic orbit passing (ϕ0, 0) when ϕ−4 < ϕ0 < ϕ

3 and ϕ0 → ϕ3 − 0. (b) The limit orbit Γ12 of the periodic orbit

passing through (ϕ0, 0) when ϕ3 < ϕ0 < ϕ+

4 and ϕ0 → ϕ3 + 0. (c) The orbits Γ11, Γ12, Γ+

13 and Γ−13 connecting to (ϕ

3, 0).

Page 14: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3206 R. Liu

a1 → − 5 + 2b(1 + b)2

, (107)

a2 → 3(2 + b)(1 + b)2

, (108)

a3 → 3(2 + b)(1 + b)2

, (109)

β → 1√2(1 + b)

, (110)

γ → 1√2(1 + b)

, (111)

ki → 1 (i = 1, 2), (112)

sn(v, 1) = tanh v, (113)

1 − tanh2v = sech2v, (114)

and

tanh−2v − 1 = csch2v. (115)

Therefore, in (9)–(12) and (16)–(17) lettingc → 1/(1 + b) and using the limit values, fromthe equations above, we get Properties (i)–(vi) inProposition 4.

Secondly, when c → 4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2), itfollows that

a1 → − 2(1 + b)4 + 2b + b2

, (116)

a2 → − 6(2 + b)4 + 2b + b2

, (117)

a3 → 0, (118)

r →√

1 + b

4 + 2b + b2, (119)

k2 → 0, (120)

sn(v, 0) = sin v. (121)

Thus in (16) and (17) letting c →4(1 + b)/(4 + 2b + b2), we get Properties (vii)and (viii).

Finally, note that when c → 1 + b, it followsthat p → 0 and α → 0. Therefore in (9)–(22) lettingc → 1 + b, we see that ui(ξ, c) → −1 (i = 1, 2, 3, 4).Hereto, we have completed the proof for our mainresults.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, for parameter b > 1 and constantwave speed c, we have studied the coexistenceof multifarious exact nonlinear wave solutions forEq. (4). Note the following facts:

(i) In [He et al., 2008a, 2008b; Khuri, 2005; Liu &Guo, 2008; Liu & Ouyang, 2007; Liu & Pan,2009; Liu & Qian, 2001; Shen & Xu, 2005;Tian & Song, 2004; Wang & Tang, 2008;Yomba, 2008a, 2008b; Zhang et al., 2007], theauthors investigated the nonlinear wave solu-tions when b = 2 or b = 3.

(ii) In [Wazwaz, 2007], the solitary wave solutionswere studied for a special wave speed c =(2 + b)/2.

(iii) In [Liu, 2010], the study was based on threespecial wave speeds c = 1/(1 + b), or c =(2 + b)/2, or c = 1 + b.

Therefore, our work includes many previousresults.

In Sec. 4, we obtained the bifurcation phaseportraits on three bifurcation curves g = gi(c)(i = 2, 3, 4). Using a similar method, we obtained allbifurcation phase portraits on c–g plane for c > 0(for c ≤ 0, system (35) has a unique singular point)as in Fig. 10.

From Fig. 10 and previous results, we have thefollowing conjectures:

Conjectures 1. When b > 1 and the wave speedc = 1/(1 + b) or c > 1 + b, Eq. (4 ) has no peakonwave solution.

Conjectures 2. When the wave speed c ≥ 1 + b,Eq. (4 ) has no explicit smooth solitary wavesolution.

Conjectures 3. When the wave speed c = 1 + b,Eq. (4 ) has no fractional solution.

Some questions also remain as follows.

Questions 1. Our derivations were based on b > 1.However, substituting the expressions of the solu-tions into Eq. (4 ) directly, we see the followingfacts: (i) From (6 )–(25 ), for b > 0, ui(ξ, c) (i =1 − 6) are still the real solutions. (ii) Via (26 )–(31 ), for b > −1, u

1(x, t), u3(x, t), u

4(x, t), u7(x, t),u8(x, t), and u9(x, t) are still the real solutions. (iii)u8(x, t) is still a real solution for b = −1. But forb ≤ 1, we do not know how to derive these expres-sions mentioned above.

Page 15: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

Coexistence of Multifarious Exact Nonlinear Wave Solutions for Generalized b-Equation 3207

Fig. 10. The bifurcation phase portraits of systems (35) and (36), where the two systems have the same topological phaseportraits except the line ϕ = c.

Questions 2. From Liu [2010] we know that for b > −2 and b = −1,

u∗2(x, t) =

3(2 + b)(2 + 3b + b2)

2(1 + b)[√

3(2 + b) cosh12

(x − 2 + b

2t

)+

√8 + 6b + b2 sinh

12

∣∣∣∣x − 2 + b

2t

∣∣∣∣]2

is a real solution of Eq. (4 ). And for b = −1, Eq. (4 )has three real solutions

u∗1(x, t) = −3(2 + b)

2(1 + b)sech2 1

2

(x − 2 + b

2t

),

u∗3(x, t) =

3(2 + b)2(1 + b)

csch2 12

(x − 2 + b

2t

),

and u8(x, t) given as (30 ).For b < −1, we do not know whether there

is any other explicit real solution except u∗i (x, t),

(i = 1, 2, 3) and u8(x, t).

References

Boyd, J. P. [1997] “Peakons and coshoidal waves: Travel-ling wave solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation,”Appl. Math. Comput. 81, 173–187.

Camassa, R. & Holm, D. D. [1993] “An integrable shal-low water equation with peaked solitons,” Phys. Rev.Lett. 71, 1661–1664.

Chen, C. & Tang, M. Y. [2006] “A new type of boundedwaves for Degasperis–Procesi equations,” Chaos Solit.Fract. 27, 698–704.

Constantin, A. [1997] “Soliton interactions for theCamassa–Holm equation,” Exp. Math. 15, 251–264.

Page 16: COEXISTENCE OF MULTIFARIOUS EXACT FOR GENERALIZED … · South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China scliurui@scut.ed.cn Received December 23, 2009; Revised

November 15, 2010 16:13 WSPC/S0218-1274 02762

3208 R. Liu

Constantin, A. & Strauss, W. A. [2000] “Stability ofpeakons,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 53, 603–610.

Cooper, F. & Shepard, H. [1994] “Solitons in theCamassa–Holm shallow water equation,” Phys. Lett.A 194, 246–250.

Degasperis, A. & Procesi, M. [1999] “Asymptoticintegrability,” Symmetry and Perturbation Theory,eds. Degasperis, A. & Gaeta, G. (World Scientific,Singapore), pp. 23–37.

Degasperis, A., Holm, D. D. & Hone, A. N. W. [2002a]“A new integrable equation with peakon solutions,”Theor. Math. Phys. 133, 170–183.

Degasperis, A., Holm, D. D. & Hone, A. N. W.[2002b] “Integrable and non-integrable equations withpeakons,” Nonlin. Phys.: Th. Exp. II, eds. Ablowitz,M. J., Boiti, M. & Pempinelli, F. (World Scientific,Singapore), pp. 37–43.

Guha, P. [2007] “Euler–Poincare formalism of (two com-ponent) Degasperis–Procesi and Holm–Staley typesystems,” J. Nonlin. Math. Phys. 14, 398–429.

Guo, B. L. & Liu, Z. R. [2005] “Periodic cusp wave solu-tions and single-solitons for the b-equation,” ChaosSolit. Fract. 23, 1451–1463.

He, B., Rui, W. G. & Chen, C. et al. [2008a] “Exact trav-eling wave solutions for a generalized Camassa–Holmequation using the integral bifurcation method,”Appl. Math. Comput. 206, 141–149.

He, B., Rui, W. G. & Li, S. L. et al. [2008b] “Boundedtraveling wave solutions for a modified form of gen-eralized Degasperis–Procesi equation,” Appl. Math.Comput. 206, 113–123.

Holm, D. D. & Staley, M. F. [2003] “Nonlinear bal-ance and exchange of stability in dynamics of solitons,peakons ramps/cliffs and leftons in a 1 + 1 nolinearevolutionary PDEs,” Phys. Lett. A 308, 437–444.

Johnson, R. S. [2002] “Camassa–Holm, Korteweg–deVries and related models for water waves,” J. FluidMech. 455, 63–82.

Khuri, S. A. [2005] “New ansatz for obtaining wave solu-tions of the generalized Camassa–Holm equation,”Chaos Solit. Fract. 25, 705–710.

Lenells, J. [2002] “The scattering approach for theCamassa–Holm equation,” J. Nonlin. Math. Phys. 9,389–393.

Liu, Z. R. & Qian, T. F. [2001] “Peakons and their bifur-cation in a generalized Camassa–Holm equation,” Int.J. Bifurcation and Chaos 11, 781–792.

Liu, Z. R., Wand, R. Q. & Jing, Z. J. [2004] “Peaked wavesolutions of Camassa–Holm equation,” Chaos Solit.Fract. 19, 77–92.

Liu, Z. R., Kayed, A. M. & Chen, C. [2006] “Peri-odic waves and their limits for the Camassa–Holmequation,” Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 16, 2261–2274.

Liu, Z. R. & Ouyang, Z. Y. [2007] “A note on soli-tary waves for modified forms of Camassa–Holm andDegasperis–Procesi equations,” Phys. Lett. A 366,377–381.

Liu, Z. R. & Guo, B. L. [2008] “Periodic blow-upsolutions and their limit forms for the generalizedCamassa–Holm equation,” Progr. Nat. Sci. 18, 259–266.

Liu, Z. R. & Pan, J. [2009] “Coexistence of multifariousexplicit nonlinear wave solutions for modified formsof Camassa–Holm and Degaperis–Procesi equations,”Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 19, 2267–2282.

Liu, R. [2010] “Several new types of solitary wave solu-tions for the generalized Camassa–Holm–Degasperis–Procesi equation,” Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal. 9,77–90.

Lundmark, H. & Szmigielski, J. [2003] “Multi-peakon solutions of the Degasperis–Procesi equation,”Inverse Prob. 19, 1241–1245.

Lundmark, H. & Szmigielski, J. [2005] “Degasperis–Procesi peakons and the discrete cubic string,” Int.Math. Res. Papers 2, 53–116.

Reyes, E. G. [2002] “Geometric integrability of theCamassa–Holm equation,” Lett. Math. Phys. 59, 117–131.

Shen, J. W. & Xu, W. [2005] “Bifurcations of smoothand non-smooth traveling wave solutions in the gener-alized Camassa–Holm equation,” Chaos Solit. Fract.26, 1149–1162.

Tian, L. X. & Song, X. Y. [2004] “New peaked soli-tary wave solutions of the generalized Camassa–Holmequation,” Chaos Solit. Fract. 21, 621–637.

Wang, Q. D. & Tang, M. Y. [2008] “New exact solu-tions for two nonlinear equations,” Phys. Lett. A 372,2995–3000.

Wazwaz, A. M. [2006] “Solitary wave solutions for mod-ified forms of Degasperis–Procesi and Camassa–Holmequations,” Phys. Lett. A 352, 500–504.

Wazwaz, A. M. [2007] “New solitary wave solutionsto the modified forms of Degasperis–Procesi andCamassa–Holm equations,” Appl. Math. Comput.186, 130–141.

Yomba, E. [2008a] “The sub-ODE method for find-ing exact traveling wave solutions of generalizednonlinear Camassa–Holm, and generalized nonlinearSchrodinger equations,” Phys. Lett. A 372, 215–222.

Yomba, E. [2008b] “A generalized auxiliary equationmethod and its application to nonlinear Klein–Gordon and generalized nonlinear Camassa–Holmequations,” Phys. Lett. A 372, 1048–1060.

Zhang, L. J., Li, Q. C. & Huo, X. W. [2007] “Bifurcationsof smooth and nonsmooth traveling wave solutions ina generalized Degasperis–Procesi equation,” J. Com-put. Appl. Math. 205, 174–185.