Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    1/11

    COGNITIVEEVALUATION

     THEORY

    OLEG ANDREEVSAS15028

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    2/11

    COGNITIVE EVALUATION THEORYMEANING

    • TWO motivation !t"m• Intrinsic motivators: motivation t#at $om"

    %&om t#" a$t'a( )"&%o&man$" o% t#" *o+,• A$#i"v"m"nt- &")oni+i(it! an. $om)"t"n$",

    • Extrinsic motivators: motivation t#at$om" %&om a )"&on/ "nvi&onm"nt-$ont&o((". +! ot#"&,

    • a!- )&omotion- %"".+a$- o&in3 $on.ition

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    3/11

    E4TRINSIC

    MOTIVATORS

    INTRINSIC

    MOTIVATORS

    NOT

     TRADITIONALLYELIEVED

    DEPENDENT

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    4/11

    BUT COGNITIVE EVALUATION THEORYSAYS:

    I !xtrinsic r!"ar#s ar! $s!#

    Intrinsic r!"ar#s #!riv!# %&

    in#ivi#$a' r!#$c!s

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    5/11

    WHY DOES SUCH AN OUTCOMEOCCUR6

    E7t&ini$ Int&ini$ L"v"( o% R"a&. Motivato& Motivation

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    6/11

    • T#" In.ivi.'a(

    "7)"&i"n$" a (o o%

    $ont&o( ov"& #i#"& on

    +"#avio& o t#at )&"vio'int&ini$ +"#avio&

    .imini#",

     T#' an in.ivi.'a()"&$")tion o% $a'ation

    o% #! #"#" o& on a

    ta i (ot,

     T#" )#"nom"non #a))"n

    +"$a'"

    2 9 : 8 10 120

    2

    9

    :

    8

    10

    12

    19E7t&ini$ v Int&ini$ motivato&

    "7int&iti$ Co('mn1

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    7/11

    •W#"n )"o)(" a&" to(. t#at t#"! i((

    &"$"iv" a tan3i+(" &"a&.,

    RE(ARD RATHER THAN TAS) ***

    •SOLUTION: v!r%a' r!"ar#s s!!m to +!!,

    ,!o,'! mor! oc$s!# on tas+ an#!nco$ra-! t.!m #o %!tt!r/

    ;OCUS

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    8/11

    OUTGROWTH O; COGNITIVE

    EVALUATION THEORY

    • D"3&"" to #i$# a

    )"&on &"aon %o&)'&'in3 a 3oa( iconsist!nt it#)"&on int"&"t an.$o&" va('",

    SEL0CONCORDANCE

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    9/11

    I% )"o)(" )'&'" 3oa(.'" to intrinsic

    int!r!st

    • I% )"o)(" )'&'" 3oa(

    .'" to !xtrinsic

    int!r!st

    • I; GOAL ATTAINED< HAY

    • I; GOAL UNATTAINED< HAY =)&o$" o% t&ivin3i %'n>

    • LESS LI?ELY TO ATTAIN GOALS< UNHAY

    • GOALS a&" (" m"anin3%'(,

    SEL0 CONCORDANCE

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    10/11

    CONCLUSION

    • EMLOYEE VIEW@• C#oo" 'ita+(" *o+

    •  Ta" ') a *o+ %o& &"aon ot#"& t#an "7t&ini$ &"a&.

    • EMLOYER VIEW@ =%&om o&3aniation vi">• Mana3"& n"". to )&ovi." int&ini$ &"a&. in a..ition to "7t&ini$

    in$"ntiv"

    • &ovi." &"$o3nition- '))o&t "m)(o!"" 3&ot#

  • 8/18/2019 Cognitive Evaluation Theory (2)

    11/11

     THAN? YOU ;OR YOURATTENTION B