11
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Cognitive ProcessesPSY 334

Chapter 3 – Attention

April 14, 2003

Page 2: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

What is Attention?

Attention is the allocation of limited processing resources.

Visual features such as shape, color, texture, motion are processed in parallel.

Serial bottleneck – occurs when it is no longer possible to process in parallel. When does it occur – early vs late

selection How do we select what to attend to?

Page 3: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

How we Experience Attention

Stream of consciousness -- we learn and remember what we attend to.

Paying attention results in a feeling of mental effort.

Can be directed internally but also pulled (attracted) by external events.

Varies with arousal and fatigue. Studied by looking at response

competition.

Page 4: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Auditory Attention

The response competition comes from having two ears.

Dichotic listening task – uses “shadowing.” Two different messages are presented,

one to each ear. Subjects are asked to speak what they hear.

People can attend to only one message at a time.

Page 5: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Broadbent’s Filter Theory

People do not remember the content of the unattended ear. Voice or noise, sex, but little else.

Broadbent’s filter theory proposed that filtering occurs early in processing based on physical characteristics (pitch, ear). Neural evidence supports the ability to

select one ear to listen to. Cocktail party effect – attention switches

based on content of unattended ear.

Page 6: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Treisman’s Attenuation Theory

Treisman’s attenuation theory – subjects deemphasize but not filter out the unattended message. Meaning switched from one ear to the

other. Some subjects switch ears even when told

not to, following the semantic content. Semantic criteria apply to all messages,

filtered or not.

Page 7: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Late Selection Theory

Deutsch & Deutsch’s late selection theory – the limitation is in the response system, not the perception. Both messages are perceived but only one

can be shadowed at a time. The criterion for selecting what to say can

change – based on ear or meaning.

Page 8: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Testing the Theories

Dichotic listening task: Shadow one message but listen for a

target word in both ears (tap when heard). Late selection theory predicts no

difficulty hearing the target in either ear. Attenuation theory predicts less

detection in non-shadowed ear. 87% detection in shadowed ear 8% detection in non-shadowed ear

Page 9: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Echoic Memory

Glucksberg & Cowen demonstrated that unattended information can be kept in an echoic memory buffer for brief periods. Shadow a message, with digit presented to

non-shadowed ear. 25% of time, is asked immediately after

presentation, reported hearing the digit. 5% of time reported the digit, without cuing

Unattended material is lost within 5 seconds.

Page 10: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Visual Attention

We can choose where to fixate our eyes for greatest visual acuity. Other portions of the visual field are

attenuated. Visual attention need not be located

where the eyes are fixed. Posner – subjects can attend to objects

up to 24 degrees from the fovea. Shift of attention precedes eye movement.

Page 11: Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 3 – Attention April 14, 2003

Spotlight Metaphor

Spotlight can be broad or narrow (degrees of visual angle). Broad areas processed less well.

A narrow focal point gives optimal processing but it takes time to move the focus to other areas of the visual field.

We move our eyes around a complex visual stimulus. Neisser & Becklen’s shadowing task.