102
COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902 Campus Commons Drive, Suite 101, Reston, VA (703) 476-3900 www.archinc.com October 2013

COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

1902 Campus Commons Drive, Suite 101, Reston, VA • (703) 476-3900 • www.archinc.com October 2013

Page 2: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

 

Page 3: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TITLE PAGE 1

I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 III. PROJECT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 10 IV. DESCRIPTION OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 11 V. EXISTING CONDITIONS 12

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS 16 A. General B. Common Design Elements

• Site • Structural System • HVAC System • Plumbing System • Fire Protection System • Electrical System

C. Option 1 20 • Narrative • Graphics • Advantages & Disadvantages

D. Option 2 24 • Narrative • Graphics • Advantages & Disadvantages

E. Option 3 28 • Narrative • Graphics • Advantages & Disadvantages

VII. PROPOSED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 32 VIII. PROPOSED BUDGET 33 IX. APPENDICES: SPACE SUMMARIES & EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS 34

A. Carl Sandburg Learning Center - Space Summary B. Maryvale Elementary School - Space Summary C. Educational Specifications

Page 4: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 1 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

FEASIBILITY STUDY Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center Collocation 1000 1st Street Rockville, Maryland 20850 Montgomery County Board of Education Mr. Christopher S. Barclay President Mr. Philip Kauffman Vice President Ms. Shirley Brandman Member Dr. Judith R. Docca Member Mr. Michael A. Durso Member Mrs. Patricia B. O’Neill Member Mrs. Rebecca Smondrowski Member Mr. Justin Kim Student Member Montgomery County Schools Administration Dr. Joshua P. Starr Superintendent of Schools Mr. James C. Song Director, Department of Facilities Management Mr. R. Craig Shuman Director, Division of Construction Mr. Michael P. Shpur Architect, Division of Construction Mr. Rakesh Bagai Project Manager, Division of Construction Ms. Deborah Szyfer Senior Planner, Division of Long-range Planning

Page 5: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

I. INTRODUCTION

Feasibility Study Participants:

Ms. Karen Gregory Principal Maryvale Elementary School Ms. Marlene Kenny Principal Carl Sandburg Learning Center Mr. Brent Mascott Interim Principal Maryvale Elementary School Mr. Seth Adams Assistant to the Director Division of Construction - MCPS Mr. Rakesh Bagai Project Manager Division of Construction - MCPS Ms. Toni Baron Staff Carl Sandburg Learning Center Ms. Sharona Clinthum Staff Maryvale Elementary School Ms. Susan Dowling Community Carl Sandburg Learning Center Ms. Becky Hubbard Staff MCPS Ms. Erin Kemp Staff Maryvale Elementary School Mr. Zachary Larnard Planner Division of Long-range Planning - MCPS Ms. Caryn Nagler Community Maryvale Elementary School Ms. Imani Pearson Staff Maryvale Elementary School Mr. Vaughn Proffton Neighbor Maryvale Elementary School Ms. Carol Scott Community Carl Sandburg Learning Center Mr. Michael Shpur Architect Division of Construction - MCPS Ms. Pat Talbert Smith Neighbor Maryvale Elementary School Mr. John Stanton Neighbor Maryvale Elementary School Ms. Sarah Starr Staff Carl Sandburg Learning Center Ms. Jillian Storms Architect Maryland State Department of Education Ms. Deborah Szyfer Senior Planner Division of Long-range Planning - MCPS

The purpose of the feasibility study was to assess the collocation of the Maryvale Elementary School program with the Carl Sandburg Learning Center program, at the existing Maryvale Elementary School site located at 1000 1st Street in Rockville, Maryland. The programmatic goal for the collocated facility is to have the Maryvale Elementary School with a student capacity of 748, and a core capacity of 740 students, collocated with the Carl Sandburg Learning Center with a student capacity of 142. Architecture, Inc. would like to thank all of the feasibility study participants for their time and commitment to this task. Their enthusiastic attitude, creative ideas and thorough analysis have helped make this study meaningful for the school system and the community at large.

Page 6: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 3 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. PURPOSE

This feasibility study develops design alternatives and related costs for the collocation of Maryvale Elementary School with the Carl Sandburg Learning Center at the Maryvale Elementary School site. Three design alternatives are analyzed in consideration of the educational specifications, objectives of each school program, physical limitations of the existing site and applicable codes and regulations. A preferred option as chosen by the feasibility study participants is designated as Option 1.

B. HISTORY The Maryvale Elementary School facility is located at 1000 1st Street in Rockville, Maryland. The existing Maryvale Elementary School facility was constructed in 1969 as the Southlawn Middle School. The original single-story structure remains essentially as originally constructed. The current Maryvale Elementary School program replaced the original middle school program circa 1982. Beyond the above noted program change, the building has received only minor modifications and upgrades throughout its history.

C. METHODOLOGY Evaluation of the existing facility and site was conducted by the design team of architects and engineers to determine the feasibility for the proposed collocation, which will comply with the educational specifications for each school. The methodology employed in this study included a thorough review of all data and drawings that were made available with respect to existing site conditions, visits to the site to conduct an existing conditions survey, meetings with the feasibility study participants and MCPS staff, incorporation of review comments and objectives of the educational specifications and the development of alternatives in response to the educational programs for each school and existing site limitations.

D. SUMMARY This study assessed the advantages and disadvantages of varied approaches for implementation of the current educational specifications for the Maryvale Elementary School and Carl Sandburg Learning Center educational programs on the Maryvale Elementary School site. Creation of a new collocated facility to house the educational programs was reviewed as well as reuse of the existing 45-year old facility to accommodate the educational programs. These approaches were discussed, reviewed and refined with input from the feasibility study participants. The existing Maryvale Elementary School facility will be unable, without enlargement, to accommodate the proposed collocated programs including the Maryvale Elementary School program with a projected capacity of 748, and a core capacity of 740; and the Carl Sandburg Learning Center program with a projected capacity of 142. The existing facility is capable of accommodating only a small portion of the program requirements. The existing Maryvale Elementary School facility would require an extensive expansion to accommodate the collocated programs, as all proposed spatial requirements will not fit within the existing building envelope. Additionally, the existing building’s location on the site precludes development of the required programmatic site

Page 7: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 4 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

elements: specifically separate bus cueing for each program; separate parent drop-off for each program; and parking. Based upon the inability of the site to meet the programmatic requirements while attempting to maintain the existing Maryvale Elementary School structure and the magnitude of the existing building expansion required to accommodate the collocated educational programs, reuse of the existing facility was determined to be the least-favored option. Site topography varies greatly with a street elevation ranging from approximately 412 ft to 416 ft, and an existing finished floor level of 422 ft. The site slopes up steeply from building level (422 ft) to the existing athletic field elevation of approximately 430 ft. The varying site elevations in conjunction with the goal to provide at-grade access from the school to the exterior play areas and ball fields as well as separate bus loops and parent drop-off -zones for each program necessitated the exploration of options for leveling the site. Several options were reviewed during the process. After much evaluation, three options were pursued in detail for the new facility. Each of these plan options incorporate key elements for the implementation of the educational programs into a new collocated facility including: • A new state of the art facility which meets the educational specifications for each school. • Administrative areas for each school located adjacent to one another to facilitate teaming and sharing of staff resources. • Administrative areas that are centrally located and adjacent to each school’s main entrance to provide security and

oversight of the school entrance, parent drop-off, bus loop and parking areas. • A single-story structure for Carl Sandburg Learning Center. • A two-story structure for Maryvale Elementary School. • A media center that is centrally located with possible shared general stack areas as well as break out spaces for each

school. • A shared kitchen and building service areas. • Separate gymnasium and multipurpose rooms for each school. • Multipurpose rooms that are conveniently located to ball fields and outdoor play areas. • Bus and parent traffic routes that are separated as much as practical. • Ball fields to serve as buffer zone between each school’s outdoor play areas. • An energy-efficient, environmentally conscious design as the basis for LEED silver certification. • Maintain the identity of each school. • Provide opportunities for students to interact when appropriate • Recognize special education students for their individual capabilities. Three options were developed that met the programmatic requirements provided by MCPS. Cost estimates are provided for each option. After review and discussion, Option 1 was selected as the preferred option that best meets the requirements outlined above.

Page 8: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 5 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, Continued

The following is a summary of the three options as well as an estimated total cost for each option: E. UNIQUE ELEMENTS of OPTION 1: (Preferred)

• New collocated “V” shaped Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center building centrally located on leveled site.

• Administrative areas for each program adjacent to one another and centrally located adjacent to each school’s main entrance that provide suitable security with oversight of school entrance, parent drop-off, bus loop and parking areas.

• Separate architectural identities for each program with separate main entrances and separate front facades.

• Centrally collocated media center for each program.

• Two-story Maryvale Elementary School wing with Grades pre-K – 1 on 1st floor and Grades 2 – 5 on 2nd floor.

• Single-story Carl Sandburg Learning Center wing as required by program requirements.

• Centrally located courtyards for each program to provide natural light to interior classrooms and to provide additional outdoor learning environments.

• Main corridor circulation control doors between the schools to facilitate appropriate controlled interaction between the student populations.

• Shared kitchen and building services adjacent to separate multipurpose rooms for each program.

• Outdoor play areas for each program that are buffered from one another by the ball fields.

• Outdoor play areas and ball fields conveniently located for each school and program.

• Separate traffic loops for Maryvale Elementary School buses and parent drop-off.

• Shared traffic loop for Carl Sandburg Learning Center buses and parent drop-off.

• Approximately 200 combined parking spaces for both schools.

Option 1 – Total Cost = $62,712,000

Page 9: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 6 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, Continued F. UNIQUE ELEMENTS of OPTION 2:

• New collocated rectilinear shaped Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center building centrally located on leveled site.

• Administrative areas for each program adjacent to one another and centrally located adjacent to each school’s main entrance that provide suitable security with oversight of school entrance, parent drop-off and parking areas.

• Shared building front facade facing 1st Street.

• Centrally collocated media center for each program.

• Two-story Maryvale Elementary School wing with Grades pre-K – 1 on 1st floor and Grades 2 – 5 on 2nd floor.

• Single-story Carl Sandburg Learning Center wing as required by program requirements.

• Centrally located courtyards for each school to provide natural light to interior classrooms and to provide additional outdoor learning environments.

• Main corridor circulation control doors between the schools to facilitate appropriate controlled interaction between the student populations.

• Shared kitchen and building services adjacent to separate multipurpose rooms for each program.

• Outdoor play areas and ball fields located adjacent to each school’s physical education area.

• Outdoor play areas for each program are buffered from one another by the ball fields

• Shared traffic loop for each school’s parent drop-off.

• Separate traffic loop for Maryvale Elementary School buses.

• Separate traffic loop for Carl Sandburg Learning Center buses.

• Approximately 200 combined parking spaces for both schools.

Option 2 – Total Cost = $61,933,000

Page 10: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 7 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, Continued G. UNIQUE ELEMENTS of OPTION 3:

• Revitalization and expansion of the existing Maryvale Elementary School building to create the collocated Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center facility.

• Administrative areas for each program adjacent to one another and adjacent to each school’s main entrance providing oversight of school entrance, parent drop-off and parking areas.

• Centrally collocated media center for each program.

• Two-story Maryvale Elementary School wing created by construction of 2nd floor above existing 1st floor.

• New single-story Carl Sandburg Learning Center wing as required by program requirements.

• Courtyards for each program to provide natural light to interior classrooms and to provide additional outdoor learning environments.

• Shared kitchen and building services adjacent to separate multipurpose rooms for each program.

• Outdoor play areas for each program are buffered from one another by the ball fields

• Shared traffic loop for Maryvale Elementary School buses and each program’s parent drop-off.

• Separate traffic loop for Carl Sandburg Learning Center buses.

• Approximately 190 combined parking spaces for both schools.

Option 3 – Total Cost = $63,988,000

Page 11: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 8 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, Continued H. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

EXISTING BUILDING

Existing Building = 92,050 SF

OPTION 1 First Floor = 144,300 SF Second Floor = 32,700 SF Total Building Area = 177,000 SF

OPTION 2 First Floor = 140,200 SF Second Floor = 34,600 SF Total Building Area = 174,800 SF

OPTION 3 Revitalization = 80,900 SF Area of Addition First Floor = 66,300 SF Area of Addition Second Floor = 33,400 SF Area of Addition = 99,700 SF Total Building Area = 180,600 SF

OPTION 1 – NEW CONSTRUCTION

OPTION 2 – NEW CONSTRUCTION

OPTION 3 – REVITALIZATION/EXPANSION

Page 12: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 9 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, Continued

I. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS All of the options have the ability to solve the various challenges associated with the collocation of the Maryvale Elementary School program with the Carl Sandburg Learning Center program, at the existing Maryvale Elementary School site. Each of the three options solves these challenges by distinctly different means. Of the three schemes created, the preferred option is Option 1. This option provides the best solution for the creation of a new collocated building. Option 1 provides separate identities for each school with separate main entrances and separate front facades. This option creates adjacent centrally located administrative areas, each with good security oversight of school entrances, parent drop-offs, bus loops and parking areas. Option 1 also makes efficient use of the site, accommodating the desired locations for outdoor play areas and ball fields for each school while providing separate traffic loops for both schools. Based upon the above noted factors, it is recommended that Option I, as depicted herein, and its associated site improvements be implemented.

J. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS

SUMMARY TABLE AND COST COMPARISON

PDF/FEASIBILITY STUDY COST OUTLINE ($000s) – PREFERRED OPTION 1 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE $52,362PLANNING $4,376CONTINGENCY AND RELATED COSTS $5,974TOTALS: $62,712

Square Footage: Option 1 (Preferred) Option 2 Option 3 Existing 0 0 92,050New Construction 177,000 174,800 99,700Revitalization 0 0 80,900Demolition (Total) 92,050 92,050 11,150Existing to Remain 0 0 80,900Total Gross Square Feet

177,000 174,800 180,600

Total Project Cost $62,712,000 $61,933,000 $63,988,000

Page 13: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 10 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

III. PROJECT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

A. SCOPE AND INTENT The purpose of this feasibility study is to evaluate several alternative options for the collocation of Maryvale Elementary School with the Carl Sandburg Learning Center at the Maryvale Elementary School site in order to provide Montgomery County Public Schools with sufficient data to determine the necessary scheduling and funding. Cost estimates for each option have been developed as a basis for consideration in the decision making process. Presently, Maryvale Elementary School enrollment is 581 in Grades prekindergarten – 5. Current enrollment at the Carl Sandburg Learning Center is 125. The proposed collocation will increase the projected Maryvale Elementary School student capacity to 748 and the Carl Sandburg Learning Center capacity to 142. The scope of work includes an evaluation of the existing Maryvale Elementary School building and site with respect to the needs of the proposed collocated educational specifications and applicable codes and regulations. The objective of the evaluation is to determine the feasibility of the existing building and site, and design alternatives to provide a physical plant that is conducive to the instructional philosophy, visions and goals of the two schools and the community. In addition to collecting and reviewing available data, the design team participated in progress review meetings at both schools with each school’s administration, MCPS staff and community representatives. As each design alternative was presented and reviewed during the feasibility study, comments were recorded and alternative schemes revised accordingly. The three options are presented herein with Option 1 being the preferred option.

B. METHODOLOGY

This feasibility study was developed with the following methodology: • Review of available data and drawings of the existing facilities.

• Four meetings, which included members of each school’s staff, PTA, community and MCPS staff.

• Establishment of the needs, goals and objectives.

• Development of review comments and the final options.

• Designation of Option 1 as the preferred scheme.

Page 14: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 11 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

IV. DESCRIPTION OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The following are the primary goals and objectives established by the feasibility study participants to be addressed by the A/E design team and the MCPS staff. A. SITE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

• Provide separate bus loops and bus loading areas for each school.

• Provide separate parent drop-off areas for each school.

• Provide adequate and separate parking for each school.

• Provide administrative visibility and visual control of the bus and parent drop-off areas as well as the parking areas.

• Allow the ball fields to serve as a buffer zone between the remainder of the outdoor play areas for the two schools.

• Provide ADA compliant access around the collocated building and throughout the site.

B. BUILDING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

• Be respectful of each school’s individual needs.

• Facilitate opportunities for interaction between the student populations in well-planned and controlled locations while being respectful of the security needs for each program.

• Locate the two administrative suites adjacent to one another to facilitate staff teaming and support.

• Share kitchen and building services operations.

• Keep multipurpose rooms separate for each school but adjacent to kitchen.

• Provide natural lighting to as many occupied rooms as possible.

• Provide ADA compliant access to the collocated building.

Page 15: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 12 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

V. EXISTING CONDITIONS

VICINITY MAP

Page 16: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 13 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

V. EXISTING CONDITIONS, Continued

EXISTING SITE PLAN

Page 17: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 14 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

V. EXISTING CONDITIONS, Continued DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITIES The existing Maryvale Elementary School facility was originally constructed in 1969 as the Southlawn Middle School and consists of a sprawling single-story building. The existing building design is fairly rectilinear with the primary central corridors creating a circulation route around the media center located at the building’s core. The main entry is flanked by classrooms to the south and the multipurpose room to the north, and leads to the main office and administrative area. The gymnasium is remote from the building core, connected via corridor to the north of the main building areas. The existing single-story structure has received only minor upgrades throughout its history. These modifications include the following: 1985 – Handicapped accessibility upgrades 1992 – Visual fire alarm system 1993 – Reroofing 2001 – Renovation to create daycare space 2001 – Teacher’s lounge renovation 2002 – HVAC & life safety enhancement 2003 – Life safety improvements 2004 – HVAC & life safety enhancement 2005 – HVAC Renovations 2008 – Toilet room renovations SITE ASSESSMENT 1. Size of Site:

The current school site is located at 1000 1st Street in the City of Rockville. The site is zoned as R-60 so the resulting front yard set back is typically 25’, the rear yard setback is 20’, and side yard is 8’. The school is located north of Norbeck Road (MD 28) and west of Gude Drive. The school is situated on 17.5 acres labeled as Parcel 572 on Tax Map GR 43. An additional 0.17 acres, Parcel 559 is part of the site also (back left). The school site can be found on ADC map 29-E05. The property generally resembles a 1100’ by 700’ rectangle with the building facing 1st Street on the narrower side of the rectangle. The existing building footprint occupies approximately 92,050 square feet; the parking area and bus loop occupy 53,970 square feet and the paved play areas occupy an additional 19,100 square feet; for a total impervious area of approximately 165,120 square feet, or 3.79 acres.

2. Site Features The school property is bordered by single-family houses on the south side (Lincoln Street), industrial buildings to the west and north, and 1st Street to the east. The school was originally built as a middle school in the late 1960s. The first floor elevation is about 422.1 feet and the school building and parking occupies the front half of the site. Significant elevation changes occur across the site. 1st Street generally is about elevation 410 feet, so the parking lot and driveways steeply slope up towards the school resulting in ADA compliance issues. Immediately behind the school is a steep hill that increases from elevation 422 feet up to 432 feet. The rear of the site is occupied by relatively flat multi athletic fields and two softball/baseball backstops. Mulched and asphalt play areas are located around the back left and right side of the school (if the school is viewed from 1st Street).

Page 18: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 15 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

3. Traffic and Parking:

The property contains an entrance/exit driveway and one exit-only driveway located on the eastern boundary of the property. 1st Street runs along the entire eastern boundary. Buses and cars both enter the site from the northern driveway. All of the parking (103 spots) and student drop off (by parents) occur in a large parking lot off to the right as one enters the school. Busses stay to the left and travel to a long, dedicated loop for their passenger pick up and drop offs. Busses then exit via the southernmost driveway. Parents exit the parking lot by leaving the same entrance from which they entered.

4. Water and Sewer Adequacy: Plans obtained through the MCPS archive site indicate that the water and sewer work all occurred with the original construction of the school in 1968. The water and sewer service to the school is provided by the City of Rockville Department of Public Works. Water is supplied by an 8” cast iron main (with outside meter vault) that is located north of the existing parking lot. The 8” water line connects to an existing 8” line that runs beneath 1st Street. Flow tests will have to be ordered to determine the size of a new service line. The public sewer is also an 8” line and it runs parallel to the 8” water on site. The 8” sanitary field connects to the 8” sewer that is located under 1st Street and flows from north to south along the entire school frontage.

5. Stormwater Management and Storm Drain Relocations: No stormwater management currently exists on site. Stormwater management facilities using environmental site design (ESD) will be provided to the maximum extent practicable, in compliance with State and City of Rockville stormwater management regulations. There are several storm drain lines that collect runoff from most of the site and combine to outfall in a 30” RCP at one location just north of existing entrance to the main parking lot (near water and sewer connections). The very back portion of the ball fields drain out to a swale in the southwest corner of the site (where Pinewood Road dead ends into school site). The front left (southeast) corner of the school, including some of the bus loop/exit, drains out via a swale or curb/gutter into 1st Street.

6. Tree Protection/Forest Conservation:

There are large trees that surround the perimeter of the school and around the front of the school, but no natural forest exists on the site. Two easements were created as part of the Richard Montgomery Modernization in 2007. A .22 acre and 0.35 acre easement were created for tree plantings. The 0.22 acre easement is in the back right (northern) corner and the 0.35 acre easement is in the back left (southwestern) corner. Norton Land Design will conduct the forest conservation plans for the project.

Page 19: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 16 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS A. GENERAL

Three conceptual options were developed in response to the MCPS educational specifications and the review comments of the feasibility study participants for the collocation of Maryvale Elementary School and Carl Sandburg Learning Center at the Maryvale Elementary School site. Options #1 and #2 propose to demolish the existing building, replacing it with a completely new two-story building. Option #3 proposes to revitalize the majority of the existing facility; demolish a small portion of the existing building; construct a new second floor above the existing single-story building and construct an addition to create an expanded Carl Sandburg Learning Center portion of the proposed new facility. All three options contain all spaces required by the educational program.

B. COMMON DESIGN ELEMENTS 1. Site

There are three building options for the collocation of Maryvale Elementary School and Carl Sandburg Learning Center at the Maryvale Elementary School site. They are all very similar from a site standpoint. The similarities include: • A significant amount of earthwork (cut to haul) will have to occur to maximize the useable (and ADA compliant) area of the

site. • The new school building will have the first floor elevation lowered by about 2’ from the existing school so that ADA

compliant walkways can be constructed between 1st Street and the school. • The perimeter of the site (north and south) will have some retaining walls with the most significant wall along the southern

boundary. • SWM will be provided by using green roofs, porous paving (if soils infiltrate), bio-filters and other environmental site

design (ESD) measures. • New water and sewer connections will be made between the building and the main lines in 1st Street. • A third entrance/exit will be built onto 1st Street. The City of Rockville has indicated they would be amenable to this idea. • A service loop will traverse the area behind the school. • The athletic fields will remain in the rear of the site, but will generally be lowered by about 10’ in elevation. • Forest Conservation will have to occur off site.

2. Structural System The scope of the structural design will be to provide the necessary structural system(s) to support the building’s dead and live loads, and simultaneously be compatible with the architectural scheme and the mechanical and electrical systems. The elementary school and learning center building will use a structural steel frame, which allows the floor and/or roof to be constructed and immediately allow other trades to access the building and start installation of partitions, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, etc. as well as the exterior masonry and brick walls.

Page 20: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 17 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

Second floor framing will consist of a 5¼ inch thick composite slab (3¼ inches of lightweight concrete on 2 inch deep steel deck) supported by steel beams and girders with structural steel columns. Roof framing at both the one and two-story areas will consist of a galvanized steel deck supported on open web steel joists and steel girders with structural steel columns.

3. HVAC System The mechanical design will be in accordance with applicable codes and standards, State of Maryland Interagency Committee (IAC), and the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. The mechanical system design in conjunction with the entire facility energy consumption shall meet or exceed 30% energy savings above the LEED Baseline system. In general the mechanical system will be single-zone vertical heat pump units coupled with a Dedicated Outdoor Air System (DOAS).The DOAS will provide 100% outdoor air and will utilize plate type heat exchangers for waste energy recovery captured through the building exhaust. The heat exchangers will have a minimum sensible efficiency of 50%. Large areas of occupancy such as the Gymnasium, Cafeteria, Multi-Purpose Rooms, Kitchen and Auditoriums will be conditioned using single zone rooftop heat pump units with Demand Control Ventilation (DCV). Rooftop units will be equipped with electric strip heaters and coil freeze pump connected to emergency power. The water source heat pump system will either be a geothermal ground source system or a standard boiler, cooling tower and flat-plate heat exchanger system as determined by the Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) in accordance with the State of Maryland requirements. The Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system will be controlled by a Direct Digital Control (DDC) based Building Automation System (BAS) with an integral Energy Management System (EMS). Local controls will be provided for split systems, unit heaters and thermostatically controlled exhaust fans. The mechanical system will be commissioned by a Commissioning Agent working in conjunction with the design professionals and the contractors in accordance with the requirements for LEED for Schools.

4. Plumbing System The plumbing design will be in accordance with applicable codes and standards, State of Maryland Interagency Committee (IAC), WSSC, and the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. The plumbing system design in conjunction with the entire facility energy consumption shall meet or exceed 30% energy savings above the LEED Baseline system. Low flow plumbing fixtures, as defined in the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide, will be provided and will reduce the water consumption of the building with respect to the LEED Baseline system. All plumbing fixtures will be provided in accordance with their intended user. Plumbing system specialties will be provided as directed in the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. The water heater will be a high efficiency gas-fired water heater with a minimum thermal efficiency of 94% and will generate 140 degree F hot water. The building water tempering valve assembly will mix the 140 degree F hot water, cold water and re-circulated hot water to provide 110 degree F hot water for distribution to the building fixtures. Kitchen fixtures or equipment requiring 140 degree F water will be supplied with such.

Page 21: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 18 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

Radon venting will be provided for every 5000 sq. ft. of building slab. Backflow preventers will be provided in accordance with WSSC to protect the potable water system. The plumbing system will be commissioned by a commissioning agent working in conjunction with the design professionals and the contractors in accordance with the requirements for LEED for Schools.

5. Fire Protection System The fire protection design will be in accordance with applicable codes and standards, State of Maryland Interagency Committee (IAC), WSSC, NFPA and the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. The fire protection system design eventually depends on the flow test data that will be received at a later date. However, for this narrative we are assuming there is adequate street flow and pressure that a fire pump is not required. The building will be fully protected by a wet sprinkler system. Pre-charged dry sprinklers will be provided in areas subject to freezing. If pre-charged dry sprinklers cannot be effectively installed then a dry pipe system will be provided. The system will be hydraulically calculated and the shop drawing plans will be prepared by individuals meeting the requirements of the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. The system will be sized in accordance with the appropriate hazard and the sprinkler zoning will be coordinated with the fire alarm system. A fire department connection (siamese connection) will be provided in a location approved by the authority having jurisdiction and it will have a fire hydrant located within 100 feet. The system will connect to the incoming water system downstream of a dedicated backflow preventer (installed by the plumbing contractor) and it will be fully drainable. The fire protection system will be specified to use recycled materials to the greatest extent possible to assist in the building’s LEED rating system.

6. Electrical System The electrical design will be in accordance with applicable codes and standards, State of Maryland Interagency Committee (IAC), and the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. The electrical system design in conjunction with the entire facility energy consumption shall meet or exceed 30% energy savings above the LEED Baseline system. A 480Y/277v electrical service will be provided from an outdoor pad-mount transformer. The preliminary size estimate for the school is 3,000kVA. A 4000A, 480Y/277V, 3PH, 4W main switchboard is projected for the project. The distribution system will be sized based on connected loads and copper cabling and bussing used for distribution. Panel boards will be located as indicated in the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. Transformers with K-13 ratings and surge protective devices included for all data power panels. An outdoor weather-protected natural gas generator will be provided, unless on-site propane is desired. The emergency system will be broken into a life safety branch and a stand-by branch for optional equipment. The loads will be sub-divided as indicated in the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide. The preliminary size estimate for the school is 150kW.

Page 22: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 19 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

Lighting requirements as defined in the Montgomery County Public Schools Facilities Guide will be provided. Exterior lighting will consider light pollution standards and utilize Dark Sky compliant fixtures. Industry improvements in sources and controls will be presented for consideration. Special systems will include fire alarm, IT, AV, paging, and security. The complete voice evacuation fire alarm system will be provided in the MEP design. A complete IT system will be provided and the current requirements, whether CAT5, CAT6, or wireless, incorporated into the MEP design. The paging/notification and AV components will be coordinated with the County and provided in the MEP design. The security will be installed under a separate contract, but the power requirements will be coordinated with the County and provided in the MEP design.

Page 23: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 20 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued C. OPTION 1 – NARRATIVE

Option 1 proposes to demolish the existing Maryvale Elementary School building and construct a new building to accommodate the collocated Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center programs. This “V” shaped option places the two schools side by side within the building with the core shared/collocated program areas adjacent to one another along the building’s diagonal central spine. The schools’ administrative areas are centrally collocated at the building corner providing very good oversight of the bus loops, parent drop-offs and parking areas. This design provides separate identities and separate front façades for each school. Specific features, graphic representations as well as advantages and disadvantages for this option are as follows: Site Considerations

Option 1 proposes a centrally located school building with Maryvale Elementary School on the north/east side and Carl Sandburg Learning Center on the south side. There would be one driveway for both Carl Sandburg Learning Center bus and car traffic along the southern border of the site. The Maryvale Elementary School bus loop and parking would be located in the middle of the front of the site. The Maryvale Elementary School student drop off and additional parking would be located on the northern, front portion of the site and would have a third entrance/exit only.

Building Option 1 proposes a new building to accommodate the collocated Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center programs. This Option includes a “V” shaped layout with the schools placed side by side and the shared and collocated program areas being adjacent to one another along the building’s diagonal central spine. The Maryvale Elementary School portion of the collocated facility will be a two-story structure and the Carl Sandburg Learning Center portion will be a single-story as necessitated by student needs. The adjacent administration areas for each school are centrally located at the building corner providing very good oversight of the bus loops, parent drop-offs and parking areas. The “V” shaped design facilitates a separate identity and separate front façade for each school. The main corridor through each program’s classroom blocks provide a loop student circulation route to all parts of each school. The points at which each program’s primary corridors intersect with the other program’s provides the opportunity for well controlled circulation between the two schools. The gymnasiums for each program are conveniently located to the outdoor activity areas. The two multipurpose rooms flank the shared kitchen area.

Page 24: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 21 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued PROPOSED SITE PLAN OPTION 1

Page 25: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 22 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN OPTION 1

Page 26: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 23 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued

OPTION 1

ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES

BUILDING & SITE

Effectively provides separate identities for each

school. Most efficient use of site. Administration areas have better oversight of

parent drop-off, bus loading and parking areas than Option 2.

Additional courtyard adjacent to centrally located and collocated media center provides natural daylight.

Multipurpose rooms & gymnasiums for both programs conveniently located to outdoor play areas/ball fields.

Courtyards provide daylight to interior classrooms.

Natural daylight to both multipurpose rooms. Separate bus loop and parent drop-off for

Maryvale Elementary School. Extensive bus queuing for each program. Traffic patterns for each program are separate. Separate parent drop-off loops for each program.

Building area is larger than Option 2 due to more

linear layout. Courtyards do not provide daylight to interior

corridors like Option 2. Shared bus loop and parent drop-off loop for Carl

Sandburg Learning Center. Extensive use of retaining walls to level site.

Page 27: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued D. OPTION 2 – NARRATIVE

Option 2 proposes to demolish the existing Maryvale Elementary School building and construct a new building to accommodate the collocated Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center programs. This rectilinear option places the two schools side by side within the building with the core shared/collocated program areas adjacent to one another along the building’s central spine. The schools adjacent administrative areas are centrally collocated along the building’s shared front façade, facing 1st Street, providing good oversight of the parent drop-off and parking areas. The efficient rectangular design minimizes the building footprint. Specific features, graphic representations as well as advantages and disadvantages for this option are as follows: Site Considerations

Option 2 proposes a centrally located rectangular school building with Maryvale Elementary School on the south side and Carl Sandburg Learning Center on the north side. The bus loops for each school would be located on the respective sides and would have dedicated entrance/exit driveways that would be located closer to the property lines. A new, third entrance/exit would be constructed in the between the other two where student drop offs and parking for both schools would occur in the middle of the site.

Building Option 2 proposes a new building to accommodate the collocated Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center programs. This option includes a rectilinear layout with the schools placed side by side and the shared and collocated program areas being adjacent to one another along the building’s central spine. The Maryvale Elementary School portion of the collocated facility will be a two-story structure and the Carl Sandburg Learning Center portion will be a single-story as necessitated by student needs. The adjacent administrative areas for each school are centrally located and face 1st Street along the building’s front facade. The main corridors through each school’s classroom blocks provide efficient student circulation to all parts of each school and also provide the opportunity for well controlled circulation between the two programs. The gymnasiums are located to the back corners of each school and are conveniently located to the outdoor activity areas. The two multipurpose rooms flank the shared kitchen area.

Page 28: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 25 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued PROPOSED SITE PLAN OPTION 2

Page 29: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 26 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN OPTION 2

Page 30: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 27 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued OPTION 2

ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES

BUILDING & SITE

Most efficient floor plan. Has smaller footprint

than Options 1 or 3. Main entrances for each school located at front of

1st Street. Efficient student circulation routes within each

program and between programs. Administration areas have good oversight of

parent drop-off areas and parking areas. Multipurpose rooms & gymnasiums for both

programs conveniently located to outdoor play areas/ball fields.

Numerous courtyards provide daylight to interior classrooms and corridors.

Daylight to multipurpose rooms across corridors. Separate bus loops for each program. Extensive bus queuing for each program.

Separate identities for each school not as well

defined as Option 1. Shared parent drop-off vehicle entrance for both

programs. Administration areas have limited oversight of bus

loading areas. 2-story Maryvale Elementary School and 1-story

Carl Sandburg Learning Center share the front façade so it may be more difficult to provide separate identities.

Extensive use of retaining walls to level site.

Page 31: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 28 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued E. OPTION 3 – NARRATIVE

Option 3 is a revitalization and expansion of the existing Maryvale Elementary School facility which includes the construction of a new second floor above the existing first floor building areas. Portions of the existing facility will be demolished to facilitate construction of the additions to accommodate the collocated Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center programs. The existing bus loop and parking areas are reused and expanded, and a new bus loop is created to serve the Carl Sandburg Learning Center. Specific features, graphic representations as well as advantages and disadvantages for this option are as follows: Site Considerations

Option 3 proposes a school building located more along the southern border of the site with Maryvale Elementary School on the east side and Carl Sandburg Learning Center on the west side. The bus loop for Maryvale Elementary School would be very similar to the one there currently where bus traffic enters in the middle of the site and exits at southern boundary. The bus loop for Carl Sandburg Learning Center would be along the northern boundary of the site and would have its own dedicated driveway. Parking and student drop offs would be in a shared lot, using the same entrance/exit that is currently there (and shared with Maryvale Elementary School busses entering the site).

Page 32: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 29 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued PROPOSED SITE PLAN OPTION 3

Page 33: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 30 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN OPTION 3

Page 34: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 31 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VI. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS, Continued OPTION 3

ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES

BUILDING & SITE

Majority of the existing structure is reused as part

of the new collocated building.

Requires extensive revitalization to salvage

existing building areas. Does not provide separate identity for each

school. Admin areas have poor visibility of bus loading

areas. Requires reinforcement of existing structure to

build new second floor above. Does not provide a distinct separation between

the two building programs. Vehicular circulation is less efficient than options

1 & 2. Building does not front to 1st Street. Provides less parking than Options 1 & 2. Limited bus queuing for Maryvale Elementary

School due to reuse of existing bus loop. Shared bus and car entrance for Maryvale

Elementary School. Shared parent drop-off area for both Schools. Least efficient, least effective and most expensive

option.

Page 35: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 32 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VII. PROPOSED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Evaluating the time required to fully execute the design and construction of the new collocated Maryvale Elementary School / Carl Sandburg Learning Center, the evaluation team has developed the following schedule of activities and time durations:

Page 36: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 33 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

VIII. PROPOSED BUDGET The cost estimates in this feasibility study are based upon current construction market conditions for both building and site. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS SUMMARY TABLE AND COST COMPARISON

PDF/FEASIBILITY STUDY COST OUTLINE ($000s) – PREFERRED OPTION 1 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE $52,362PLANNING $4,376CONTINGENCY AND RELATED COSTS $5,974TOTALS: $62,712

Square Footage: Option 1 (Preferred) Option 2 Option 3 Existing 0 0 92,050New Construction 177,000 174,800 99,700Revitalization 0 0 80,900Demolition (Total) 92,050 92,050 11,150Existing to Remain 0 0 80,900Total Gross Square Feet

177,000 174,800 180,600

Total Project Cost $62,712,000 $61,933,000 $63,988,000

Page 37: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

MARYVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL / CARL SANDBURG LEARNING CENTER COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 34 ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED

IX. APPENDIX 1: SPACE SUMMARIES & EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

A. Carl Sandburg Learning Center - Space Summary B. Maryvale Elementary School - Space Summary C. Educational Specifications

Page 38: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

 

Page 39: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Whe

n th

is p

roje

ct is

com

plet

e, th

e fo

llow

ing

spac

es a

re to

be

prov

ided

:Th

e ca

paci

ty w

ill b

e 14

2.

Upd

ated

Apr

il 22

, 201

3N

etTo

tal N

etFa

cilit

y#

Des

crip

tion

Sq.

Ft.

Sq.

Ft.

Cla

ssro

oms

Cla

ssro

oms (

Gra

des K

-1)

10In

clud

es 2

00 sf

stor

age

900

9000

Toile

t Roo

ms (

Gra

des K

-1)

5Pr

ovid

e on

e fo

r eac

h pa

ir 10

050

0C

lass

room

s (G

rade

s 2-5

)8

Cla

ssro

oms w

ith 2

00 s.

f. st

orag

e90

072

00St

uden

t Sup

port/

Obs

erva

tion

Roo

m11

Prov

ide

one

for e

ach

pair

150

1650

Cla

ssro

om (E

mot

iona

l Dis

abili

ties)

2C

lass

room

s with

150

s.f.

stor

age

900

1800

Toile

t Roo

m (E

mot

iona

l Roo

m)

110

010

0St

uden

t Sup

port

Roo

m (E

mot

iona

l D

isab

ilitie

s)1

250

250

Cla

ssro

om (A

ugm

enta

tive

Com

mun

icat

ion)

2C

lass

room

s with

200

s.f.

stor

age

900

1800

Art

1In

clud

es 2

50 s.

f. st

orag

e/no

kiln

1100

1100

Mus

ic1

Incl

udes

250

sf st

orag

e10

5010

50C

ompu

ter L

ab1

900

900

Mul

tipur

pose

Lab

1Pe

rimet

er si

nks,

1 ov

en, 1

di

shw

ashe

r and

1 w

ashe

r/dry

er90

090

0

Sup

port

Roo

ms

Sens

ory

Ther

apy

Roo

m2

200

400

Mot

or R

oom

1W

ith st

orag

e cl

oset

1000

1000

OT/

PT O

ffic

e1

250

250

PBIS

(Pos

itive

Beh

avio

ral I

nter

vent

ions

an d

122

522

5Sp

eech

/Lan

guag

e R

oom

220

040

0Sp

eech

The

rapi

st O

ffic

e1

200

200

Test

ing

Roo

m3

150

450

Cou

nsel

or's

Off

ice

125

025

0Ps

ycho

logi

st O

ffic

e1

Adj

acen

t to

test

ing

room

150

150

Boo

k R

oom

130

030

0Sm

all I

nstru

ctio

nal R

oom

145

045

0Pa

rent

Edu

cato

r Off

ice

115

015

0Pa

rent

Res

ourc

e R

oom

125

025

0O

ther

Itin

eran

t Sta

ff O

ffic

es2

150

300

IEP

Con

fere

nce

Roo

m1

To a

ccom

mod

ate

up to

20

peop

le45

045

0

Car

l San

dbur

g Le

arni

ng C

ente

rS

quar

e Fo

ot S

umm

ary

1

Page 40: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Whe

n th

is p

roje

ct is

com

plet

e, th

e fo

llow

ing

spac

es a

re to

be

prov

ided

:Th

e ca

paci

ty w

ill b

e 14

2.

Upd

ated

Apr

il 22

, 201

3N

etTo

tal N

etFa

cilit

y#

Des

crip

tion

Sq.

Ft.

Sq.

Ft.

Car

l San

dbur

g Le

arni

ng C

ente

rS

quar

e Fo

ot S

umm

ary

Phy

sica

l Edu

catio

nG

ymna

sium

118

0018

00O

ffic

e1

150

150

Stor

age

245

090

0O

utdo

or S

tora

ge1

150

150

Med

ia C

ente

rR

esou

rce/

Circ

ulat

ion

112

5012

50M

ater

ials

Pre

para

tion/

Off

ice

125

025

0M

edia

Sto

rage

130

030

0Te

xtbo

ok st

orag

e1

200

200

Con

trol R

oom

125

025

0Te

leco

mm

unic

atio

n C

lose

t1

200

200

Mul

ti-P

urpo

se R

oom

Mul

ti-Pu

rpos

e R

oom

/Caf

eter

ia1

1800

1800

Cha

ir St

orag

e1

150

150

Tabl

e St

orag

e1

150

150

Plat

form

with

Ram

ps1

450

450

Kitc

hen

110

0010

00

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Gen

eral

Off

ice

135

035

0Pr

inci

pal's

Off

ice

125

025

0C

onfe

renc

e R

oom

130

030

0W

ork

Roo

m1

250

250

Tele

phon

e R

oom

150

50R

ecor

ds R

oom

112

512

5Te

stin

g C

lose

t1

150

150

Stud

ent S

uppo

rt O

ffic

e1

150

150

Elem

enta

ry P

rogr

am S

peci

alis

t Off

ices

215

030

0St

aff D

evel

opm

ent O

ffic

e1

200

200

Trai

ning

Are

a1

450

450

Staf

f Lou

nge

170

070

0

2

Page 41: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Whe

n th

is p

roje

ct is

com

plet

e, th

e fo

llow

ing

spac

es a

re to

be

prov

ided

:Th

e ca

paci

ty w

ill b

e 14

2.

Upd

ated

Apr

il 22

, 201

3N

etTo

tal N

etFa

cilit

y#

Des

crip

tion

Sq.

Ft.

Sq.

Ft.

Car

l San

dbur

g Le

arni

ng C

ente

rS

quar

e Fo

ot S

umm

ary

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

Sui

teW

aitin

g A

rea

110

010

0Tr

eatm

ent/M

edic

atio

n A

rea

112

012

0O

ffic

e/C

onsu

lt/Ex

amin

atio

n A

rea

110

010

0Ex

amin

atio

n/Is

olat

ion

110

010

0R

est A

reas

120

020

0To

ilet R

oom

150

50G

room

ing

Roo

m1

8080

Stor

age

Are

a1

4040

Laun

dry

Roo

m1

5050

Bui

ldin

g Se

rvic

es O

ffic

e1

Off

ice

with

Sho

wer

are

a30

030

0G

ener

al S

tora

ge3

Indo

or S

tora

ge C

lose

ts25

075

01

Out

door

Sto

rage

Clo

set/S

hed

300

300

Com

pact

or R

oom

115

015

0R

ecyc

ling

Roo

m1

150

150

TO

TA

LT

OT

AL

4624

0

3

Page 42: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Whe

n th

is p

roje

ct is

com

plet

e, th

e fo

llow

ing

spac

es a

re to

be

prov

ided

:C

apac

ity a

fter m

oder

niza

tion

will

be

748

with

a c

ore

capa

city

of 7

40.

Net

Tota

l Net

Faci

lity

#D

escr

ipti

onS

q. F

t.S

q. F

t.

C

lass

room

sPr

ekin

derg

arte

n3

Incl

udes

250

s.f.

stor

age

1300

3900

Kin

derg

arte

n6

Incl

udes

250

s.f.

stor

age

1300

7800

Gra

des 1

-5

25In

clud

es 1

50 s.

f. st

orag

e90

022

500

Art

1In

clud

es 2

50 s.

f. st

orag

e11

0011

00M

usic

1In

clud

es 2

50 s.

f. st

orag

e10

5010

50In

stru

men

tal M

usic

Roo

m1

400

400

Dua

l pur

pose

Roo

m1

1000

1000

CA

PP P

rogr

amC

lass

room

(Spe

cial

Edu

catio

n C

APP

)3

Incl

udes

150

s.f.

stor

age

1050

3150

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

Cla

ssro

om O

bser

vatio

n R

oom

s3

100

300

Stor

age

115

015

0Sp

eech

Roo

m1

150

150

Sens

ory

Roo

m1

200

200

Offi

ce1

100

100

Supp

ort

Roo

ms

LI

tti

lStR

260

012

00

Mar

yval

e El

emen

tary

Sch

ool M

oder

niza

tion

Squ

are

Foot

Sum

mar

y

Janu

ary

18, 2

013

Larg

e In

stru

ctio

nal S

uppo

rt R

oom

260

012

00Sm

all

Inst

ruct

iona

l Sup

port

Roo

m3

450

1350

Spee

ch/L

angu

age

Roo

m1

250

250

Ther

apy/

Supp

ort R

oom

125

025

0In

stru

ctio

nal D

ata

Ass

ista

nt O

ffice

125

025

0Su

ppor

t Sta

ff O

ffice

s2

150

300

Spec

ial P

rogr

ams O

ffice

115

015

0Sp

ecia

l Edu

catio

n C

onfe

renc

e R

oom

130

030

0

Med

ia C

ente

rM

ain

Res

ourc

e A

rea

123

5023

50M

ater

ials

Pre

para

tion/

Offi

ce A

rea

140

040

0M

edia

Sto

rage

135

035

0Te

xtbo

ok S

tora

ge1

200

200

Con

trol R

oom

and

Sto

rage

125

025

0Te

leco

mm

unic

atio

n Eq

uipm

ent C

lose

t1

150

150

Tele

com

mun

icat

ion

Clo

set

350

150

Com

pute

r Lab

orat

ory

190

090

0

1

Page 43: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Net

Tota

l Net

Faci

lity

#D

escr

ipti

onS

q. F

t.S

q. F

t.

Phy

sica

l Edu

cati

on

G

ymna

sium

137

0037

00O

ffice

1

150

150

Stor

age

125

025

0St

orag

e2

100

200

Out

side

Sto

rage

1

150

150

Mul

tipur

pose

Roo

mM

ultip

urpo

se R

oom

137

0037

00C

hair

Stor

age

120

020

0Ta

ble

Stor

age

120

020

0Pl

atfo

rm1

450

450

Bef

ore/

Afte

r Car

e K

itche

nette

150

50B

efor

e/A

fter C

are

Stor

age

110

010

0

Kitc

hen

Serv

ing

Are

a1

300

300

Wal

k-in

Coo

ler/F

reez

er1

155

155

Dry

Sto

rage

119

219

2O

ffice

110

010

0To

ilet R

oom

170

70Pr

epar

atio

n A

rea

155

555

5

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Gen

eral

Offi

ce1

500

500

Wor

kroo

m1

350

350

Prin

cipa

l's O

ffice

125

025

0A

ssis

tant

Prin

cipa

l's O

ffice

115

015

0C

onfe

renc

e1

300

300

Tele

phon

e B

ooth

150

50St

orag

e1

100

100

Rec

ord

Roo

m1

100

100

Test

ing

Roo

m1

150

150

Toile

t Roo

m1

5050

2nd

Floo

r Wor

kroo

m1

7575

Cou

nsel

ing

Are

aC

ouns

elor

's O

ffice

125

025

0Iti

nera

nt S

taff

Offi

ce1

150

150

2

Page 44: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Net

Tota

l Net

Faci

lity

#D

escr

ipti

onS

q. F

t.S

q. F

t.

Staf

f Dev

elop

men

t A

rea

Staf

f Dev

elop

men

t Offi

ce1

10

010

0R

eadi

ng S

peci

alis

t Offi

ce1

100

100

Trai

ning

/Con

fere

nce

Roo

m1

450

450

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

Suite

Wai

ting

Are

a1

100

100

Trea

tmen

t/Med

icat

ion

Are

a1

120

120

Offi

ce/H

ealth

Ass

essm

ent R

oom

110

010

0H

ealth

Ass

essm

ent/I

sola

tion

Roo

m1

100

100

Res

t Are

as1

200

200

Toile

t Roo

m1

5050

Stor

age

Are

a1

4040

Staf

f Lou

nge

170

070

0

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ce F

acili

ties

Bui

ldin

g Se

rvic

es O

ffice

115

015

0Lo

cker

/Sho

wer

Are

a1

150

150

Com

pact

or/T

rash

Roo

m1

150

150

Gen

eral

Sto

rage

and

Rec

eivi

ng1

400

400

Gen

eral

Sto

rage

325

0 sq

. ft.

each

250

750

Bui

ldin

g Se

rvic

es O

utdo

or S

tora

ge1

175

175

kB

ook

Stor

age

230

060

0PT

A S

tora

ge1

150

150

The

follo

win

g sp

aces

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed a

s an

add-

alte

rnat

e:

Link

ages

to

Lear

ning

Rec

eptio

n A

rea

120

020

0C

onfe

renc

e R

oom

130

030

0St

orag

e C

lose

t1

5050

Men

tal H

ealth

Cou

nsel

or’s

Offi

ce/P

lay

Ther

apy

Roo

m1

250

250

Cas

e M

anag

er's

Offi

ce1

150

150

Site

Coo

rdin

ator

Offi

ce1

150

150

Staf

f Toi

let

160

60

Tota

l11

60

Tota

l37

69

34

2

3

Page 45: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Elem

enta

ry

Sch

ool

Educ

atio

nal

Spe

cific

atio

ns

Feas

ibili

ty S

tudy

D

ate

Janu

ary

18

, 20

13

M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y P

ublic

Sch

ools

R

ockv

ille,

Mar

ylan

d 2

08

50

Page 46: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Tabl

e of

Con

tent

s

Tabl

e of

Con

tent

s Sp

ace

Sum

mar

y ...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.. Err

or!

Boo

km

ark

not

def

ined

. In

trodu

ctio

n ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

... 2 

Gen

eral

Pla

nnin

g C

onsi

dera

tions

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.... 3

 D

escr

iptio

n of

Fac

ilitie

s ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.. 6 

Prek

inde

rgar

ten/

Kin

derg

arte

n C

lass

room

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

6 St

anda

rd C

lass

room

.....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

... 8 

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

Cla

ssro

om ..

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 10 

Art

Roo

m ..

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.. 11

 M

usic

Sui

te ..

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

14 

Dua

l Pur

pose

Roo

m ...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

... 1

6 Su

ppor

t Roo

ms..

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

17 

Inst

ruct

iona

l Med

ia C

ente

r ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

... 2

1 C

ompu

ter L

abor

ator

y ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

27 

Phys

ical

Edu

catio

n ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.... 2

8 M

ultip

urpo

se R

oom

and

Pla

tform

.....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

... 3

2 Fo

od S

ervi

ces .

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

... 3

4 A

dmin

istra

tion

suite

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

37 

Staf

f Dev

elop

men

t Are

a ...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.. 41

 H

ealth

Ser

vice

s Sui

te ...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 42 

Staf

f Lou

nge.

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

45 

Bui

ldin

g Se

rvic

e Fa

cilit

ies .

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 46 

Site

Req

uire

men

ts ...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.... 4

9 Si

te R

equi

rem

ents

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.... E

rror

! B

ook

mar

k n

ot d

efin

ed. 

Driv

eway

and

Ser

vice

Driv

e ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 49 

Land

scap

ing .

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

50 

Phys

ical

Edu

catio

n In

stru

ctio

nal S

ite R

equi

rem

ents

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.... 5

2 Pl

aygr

ound

Equ

ipm

ent A

reas

(mul

ched

are

as) ..

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

54 

Kin

derg

arte

n Pl

ay A

rea

(mul

ched

are

a) ..

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

... 5

4 Pr

ekin

derg

arte

n Pl

ay A

reas

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 55 

Add

ition

al P

rogr

am R

equi

rem

ents

.....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

56 

Page 47: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

In

trod

uctio

n

Intr

oduc

tion

□ Th

is d

ocum

ent d

escr

ibes

the

faci

litie

s tha

t are

nee

ded

for t

he _

____

____

____

_ ed

ucat

iona

l pr

ogra

m.

The

desc

riptio

ns p

rovi

de th

e ar

chite

ct w

ith im

porta

nt g

uide

lines

and

will

be

used

by

staf

f rep

rese

ntat

ives

whe

n re

view

ing

draw

ings

for t

he fa

cilit

y.

□ Th

e pr

ogra

m c

apac

ity fo

r thi

s sch

ool w

ill b

e __

_ w

ith a

mas

ter-

plan

ned

(cor

e) c

apac

ity fo

r ___

. Th

e sc

hool

nee

ds a

__-

clas

sroo

m m

aste

r-pl

anne

d ad

ditio

n to

brin

g th

e pr

ogra

m sc

hool

up

to it

s m

aste

r-pl

anne

d ca

paci

ty. T

he a

rchi

tect

shou

ld sh

ow th

e lo

catio

n fo

r the

futu

re c

lass

room

ad

ditio

n.

□ Th

e ed

ucat

iona

l spe

cific

atio

ns a

re d

ivid

ed in

to th

ree

sect

ions

.

• Th

e fir

st se

ctio

n, th

e sp

ace

sum

mar

y, li

sts t

he ty

pe o

f spa

ces a

nd sq

uare

foot

age

requ

ired

whe

n th

e pr

ojec

t is c

ompl

ete.

The

seco

nd se

ctio

n de

scrib

es th

e ge

nera

l des

ign,

loca

tion,

and

spec

ific

requ

irem

ents

for

each

type

of s

pace

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y Pu

blic

Sch

ools

(MC

PS)

stan

dard

s.

• Th

e th

ird se

ctio

n id

entif

ies a

dditi

onal

pro

gram

requ

irem

ents

for t

he sc

hool

.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

show

the

loca

tion

for r

eloc

atab

le c

lass

room

s, sh

ould

they

be

requ

ired

in th

e fu

ture

. Th

ese

units

shou

ld b

e si

ted

in a

loca

tion

whe

re it

will

not

cau

se c

onfli

ct w

ith th

e co

nstru

ctab

ility

of a

futu

re a

dditi

on.

The

nece

ssar

y ut

ility

con

nect

ions

, i.e

. ele

ctric

al p

ower

, fire

al

arm

, pub

lic a

ddre

ss, a

nd d

ata

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed n

ear t

he fu

ture

loca

tion

of re

loca

tabl

e cl

assr

oom

s.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct w

ill p

rovi

de a

spac

e su

mm

ary

com

paris

on b

etw

een

the

prog

ram

med

spac

e re

quire

men

ts a

nd th

e pr

opos

ed a

fter e

ach

phas

e of

the

proj

ect i

nclu

ding

but

not

lim

ited

to th

e fe

asib

ility

stud

y, sc

hem

atic

des

ign,

des

ign

deve

lopm

ent,

and

final

des

ign

phas

e.

□ Fo

r all

new

scho

ols a

nd m

oder

niza

tions

, the

pro

ject

will

be

desi

gned

for L

EED

Silv

er

certi

ficat

ion

by th

e U

nite

d St

ates

Gre

en B

uild

ing

Cou

ncil

(USB

GC

) und

er th

e LE

ED fo

r Sch

ools

gu

idel

ines

. If

this

pro

ject

is a

cla

ssro

om a

dditi

on, t

he c

ertif

icat

ion

requ

irem

ent a

pplie

s onl

y if

the

addi

tion

doub

les t

he e

xist

ing

build

ing

foot

prin

t. If

this

pro

ject

is a

bui

ldin

g re

nova

tion,

the

certi

ficat

ion

requ

irem

ent a

pplie

s onl

y if

the

reno

vatio

n al

ters

mor

e th

an fi

fty p

erce

nt o

f the

ex

istin

g bu

ildin

g gr

oss f

loor

are

a.

Page 48: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

G

ener

al P

lann

ing

Con

side

ratio

ns

Gen

eral

Pla

nnin

g C

onsi

dera

tions

In

the

gene

ral p

lann

ing

of th

is b

uild

ing,

spec

ial c

onsi

dera

tion

is to

be

give

n to

the

follo

win

g co

mm

ents

and

inst

ruct

ions

:

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct is

exp

ecte

d to

be

com

plia

nt w

ith a

ll na

tiona

l, st

ate

and

loca

l fire

safe

ty, l

ife sa

fety

, an

d he

alth

cod

e re

gula

tions

and

to fo

llow

app

licab

le ru

les o

f the

Sta

te In

tera

genc

y C

omm

ittee

on

Scho

ol C

onst

ruct

ion.

□ Th

e bu

ildin

g is

to b

e ac

cess

ible

to th

e di

sabl

ed w

ithin

the

mea

ning

of t

he la

test

edi

tion

of th

e A

mer

ican

s with

Dis

abili

ties A

ct a

nd to

con

form

to a

ll th

e la

test

requ

irem

ents

of t

he A

mer

ican

s w

ith D

isab

ilitie

s Act

Acc

essi

bilit

y G

uide

lines

(AD

AA

G) a

s pub

lishe

d by

the

U.S

. Arc

hite

ctur

al

and

Tran

spor

tatio

n B

arrie

rs C

ompl

ianc

e B

oard

. (Th

e re

gula

tion

can

be fo

und

at

http

://w

ww

.acc

ess-

boar

d.go

v/ad

aag/

htm

l/ada

ag.h

tm).

In a

dditi

on to

the

AD

AA

G, t

he M

aryl

and

Acce

ssib

ility

Cod

e (C

OM

AR

.05.

02.0

2) re

vise

d in

200

2 al

so is

requ

ired

for p

ublic

scho

ols.

(The

re

gula

tion

can

be fo

und

at h

ttp://

mdc

odes

.um

bc.e

du/d

hcd2

/Titl

e05.

pdf)

□ Th

e fa

cilit

y is

to re

flect

an

appe

alin

g vi

sual

, aco

ustic

, and

ther

mal

env

ironm

ent a

nd is

to b

e pr

oper

ly fu

rnis

hed

and

equi

pped

. W

ell c

hose

n co

lors

and

text

ures

are

to b

e us

ed.

Ligh

ting

mus

t m

eet c

urre

nt g

uide

lines

and

pro

vide

ade

quat

e le

vels

.

□ H

igh

qual

ity m

ater

ials

are

to b

e us

ed in

the

cons

truct

ion.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

refe

r to

the

MC

PS F

acili

ty G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

whe

n no

ted.

The

do

cum

ent c

an b

e fo

und

at:

http

://w

ww

.mon

tgom

erys

choo

lsm

d.or

g/de

partm

ents

/con

stru

ctio

n/pu

blic

atio

ns/g

uide

lines

.shtm

□ Th

e fir

st im

pres

sion

of a

bui

ldin

g is

impo

rtant

. Th

e m

ain

entra

nce

to th

e sc

hool

shou

ld h

ave

a cl

ear a

nd in

vitin

g id

entit

y, a

nd th

e en

tranc

e ar

ea sh

ould

be

desi

gned

and

land

scap

ed to

em

phas

ize

its im

porta

nce.

A c

over

ed w

alkw

ay fr

om th

e bu

s loa

ding

are

a to

the

fron

t doo

r is

desi

rabl

e. T

he d

esig

n of

the

mai

n lo

bby

area

nee

ds to

con

vey

a fe

elin

g of

war

mth

and

wel

com

e.

The

incl

usio

n of

a li

ghte

d sh

owca

se in

whi

ch c

hild

ren'

s wor

k ca

n be

dis

play

ed is

reco

mm

ende

d.

□ Th

e de

sign

of t

he b

uild

ing

and

grou

nds m

ust p

rovi

de fo

r a se

cure

env

ironm

ent f

or st

uden

ts a

nd

staf

f. Is

olat

ed a

reas

shou

ld b

e m

inim

ized

and

nat

ural

surv

eilla

nce

enco

urag

ed b

y el

imin

atin

g vi

sual

bar

riers

.

□ Fo

r sec

urity

pur

pose

s, al

l doo

rs in

to c

lass

room

s, co

nfer

ence

room

s, of

fices

etc

. mus

t hav

e a

side

light

win

dow

with

shad

es.

□ W

ater

coo

lers

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed th

roug

hout

the

scho

ol.

□ Ev

ery

teac

hing

stat

ion,

supp

ort s

pace

, and

cor

e ar

ea m

ust b

e w

ired

for c

ompu

ter,

CC

TV, a

nd

tele

phon

e, a

long

with

ade

quat

e el

ectri

cal s

uppl

y in

com

plia

nce

with

Mar

ylan

d Sa

te d

esig

n gu

idel

ines

for T

echn

olog

y in

Sch

ools

and

the

MC

PS O

ffic

e of

the

Chi

ef T

echn

olog

y O

ffic

e (O

CTO

) gui

delin

es. F

acili

ties m

ust b

e ad

apta

ble

to a

ccom

mod

ate

rapi

d de

velo

pmen

t in

high

Page 49: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

G

ener

al P

lann

ing

Con

side

ratio

ns

tech

nolo

gy a

nd it

s equ

ipm

ent s

ince

edu

catio

nal p

rogr

am a

nd o

rgan

izat

ion

in th

is fi

eld

are

dyna

mic

. Sp

ace

and

pow

er su

pply

mus

t be

flexi

ble

to m

eet t

hese

cha

ngin

g ne

eds.

□ Co

re sp

aces

such

as t

he c

afet

eria

, gym

nasiu

ms,

and

instr

uctio

nal m

edia

cen

ter s

houl

d be

eas

ily

acce

ssib

le fo

r com

mun

ity u

se a

nd se

cure

from

the

rest

of th

e bu

ildin

g af

ter s

choo

l hou

rs.

□ A

n M

CPS

des

igne

d al

arm

syst

em w

ill p

rovi

de se

curit

y fo

r thi

s fac

ility

. Th

e ar

chite

ct w

ill

prov

ide

for t

his s

yste

m in

con

sulta

tion

with

the

DO

C st

aff.

□ B

uild

ing

code

requ

irem

ents

cal

l for

less

than

fifty

per

cent

of i

nter

ior c

orrid

or sp

ace

to b

e us

ed

for d

ispl

ayin

g fla

mm

able

mat

eria

ls.

Dis

play

are

as c

an b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y a

5’ x

5’ b

ulle

tin b

oard

pe

r cla

ssro

om o

r an

equi

vale

nt a

mou

nt o

f spa

ce in

a la

rger

are

a. P

leas

e re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fa

cilit

y G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

.

□ St

uden

ts sh

ould

hav

e A

DA

com

plia

nt a

cces

s to

the

play

are

as fr

om th

e m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om.

Play

ar

eas a

re to

be

prot

ecte

d fr

om a

ny v

ehic

ular

traf

fic.

Uno

bstru

cted

supe

rvis

ion

of p

lay

area

s fro

m

one

cent

ral a

rea

is d

esira

ble.

□ Th

e sc

hool

is to

be

air-

cond

ition

ed e

xcep

t for

the

gym

nasi

um a

nd k

itche

n. C

aref

ul p

lace

men

t of

glas

s is r

equi

red

to a

void

exc

ess h

eat g

ain

in o

ccup

ied

area

s.

□ So

me

win

dow

s mus

t be

oper

able

in e

ach

spac

e in

the

build

ing.

Tra

nsm

issi

on o

f rad

iatio

n th

roug

h w

indo

ws i

nto

vario

us p

ortio

ns o

f the

pla

nt is

to b

e co

nsid

ered

in re

latio

n to

hea

ting

and

vent

ilatin

g an

d in

rela

tion

to p

lann

ing

the

build

ing

for a

ir co

nditi

onin

g. A

ll in

stru

ctio

nal s

pace

s sh

ould

hav

e w

indo

ws,

pref

erab

ly e

xter

ior w

indo

ws.

If th

e de

sign

doe

s not

per

mit

exte

rior

win

dow

s, w

indo

ws o

nto

corr

idor

s sho

uld

be p

rovi

ded.

□ Zo

ning

the

plan

t for

hea

ting

and

air-

cond

ition

ing

shou

ld b

e re

late

d to

afte

r-ho

urs u

se o

f var

ious

ar

eas s

uch

as o

ffic

es, g

ymna

sium

, mul

tipur

pose

room

, and

the

inst

ruct

iona

l med

ia c

ente

r.

App

ropr

iate

loca

tion

of p

arki

ng, c

orrid

or b

arrie

rs, a

nd to

ilet r

oom

s is n

eces

sary

for a

fter-

hour

s us

e. S

ome

clas

sroo

ms n

earb

y th

e m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om sh

ould

be

zone

d fo

r afte

r hou

r use

as w

ell.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

refe

r to

MSD

E’s 2

006

Cla

ssro

om A

cous

tic G

uide

lines

to a

ddre

ss th

e ac

oust

ical

qua

litie

s for

cla

ssro

oms.

In a

dditi

on, t

he a

rchi

tect

shou

ld re

fer t

o Am

eric

an N

atio

nal

Stan

dard

, Aco

ustic

al P

erfo

rman

ce C

rite

ria,

Des

ign

Requ

irem

ents

, and

Gui

delin

es fo

r Sch

ools

(A

NSI

S12

.60-

2002

) for

add

ition

al in

form

atio

n.

□ N

oise

and

dis

tract

ing

soun

ds a

re to

be

min

imiz

ed.

In a

reas

such

as t

he m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om a

nd

clas

sroo

ms,

whi

ch m

ay b

e us

ed fo

r mee

tings

and

adu

lt ed

ucat

ion,

the

soun

d of

ope

ratin

g fa

ns fo

r ve

ntila

tion

shou

ld n

ot in

terf

ere

with

inst

ruct

ion.

□ A

dult

rest

room

s sho

uld

be p

rovi

ded

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith th

e la

test

cod

e re

quire

men

ts.

Adu

lt re

stro

oms i

n el

emen

tary

scho

ols w

ill b

e un

isex

.

□ Sp

aces

that

serv

e no

real

edu

catio

nal f

unct

ion,

such

as c

orrid

ors,

shou

ld b

e lim

ited

whi

le a

t the

sa

me

time

assu

ring

an e

asy

to su

perv

ise

and

smoo

th fl

ow o

f pup

il tra

ffic

to a

nd fr

om th

e

Page 50: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

G

ener

al P

lann

ing

Con

side

ratio

ns

inst

ruct

iona

l med

ia c

ente

r, m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om, g

ymna

sium

, spe

cial

ized

cen

ters

, and

supp

ort

room

s.

□ C

arpe

ting

shou

ld b

e lim

ited

to th

e pr

inci

pal’s

off

ice,

ass

ista

nt p

rinci

pal’s

off

ice

and

conf

eren

ce

room

in th

e ad

min

istra

tion

suite

and

the

mai

n re

adin

g ro

om o

f the

inst

ruct

iona

l med

ia c

ente

r.

□ A

ll in

stru

ctio

nal,

reso

urce

, or o

ffic

e sp

aces

that

stud

ents

may

occ

upy

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed w

ith

eith

er a

side

light

or g

lass

pan

el in

the

door

and

mus

t be

able

to b

e su

perv

ised

from

the

corr

idor

or

an a

djac

ent s

pace

. Doo

rs sh

ould

be

prov

ided

bet

wee

n cl

assr

oom

s whe

neve

r pos

sibl

e, h

owev

er,

expe

nsiv

e fo

ldin

g w

alls

shou

ld b

e ca

refu

lly c

onsi

dere

d as

they

are

rare

ly u

tiliz

ed.

□ Th

e cl

assr

oom

s sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to a

ccom

mod

ate

vario

us si

ze g

roup

s. E

ach

clas

sroo

m sh

ould

be

read

ily a

dapt

able

for

gro

up w

ork,

var

ious

pre

sent

atio

n fo

rmat

s, an

d sh

ould

hav

e m

axim

um

conn

ectiv

ity to

out

side

reso

urce

s.

□ Th

e sh

ape

of th

e cl

assr

oom

and

the

desi

gn o

f bui

lt-in

feat

ures

and

stor

age

area

s sho

uld

prov

ide

optim

um n

et u

sabl

e flo

or a

rea.

Elo

ngat

ed ro

oms a

nd fe

atur

es th

at p

rotru

de in

to fl

oor a

rea,

lim

iting

flex

ibili

ty, a

re to

be

disc

oura

ged.

Rec

tang

ular

shap

ed c

lass

room

s are

pre

ferr

ed.

□ M

etal

adj

usta

ble

shel

ving

is to

be

prov

ided

in a

ll bu

ildin

g st

orag

e cl

oset

s.

□ A

ll pl

an re

view

s will

be

coor

dina

ted

thro

ugh

the

Div

isio

n of

Con

stru

ctio

n.

□ Sp

ecia

l con

side

ratio

n m

ust b

e gi

ven

to e

nerg

y co

nser

vatio

n in

clud

ing

tota

l life

-cyc

le c

osts

. Th

e cu

rren

t Mar

ylan

d St

ate

Dep

artm

ent o

f Gen

eral

Ser

vice

(DG

S) re

quire

men

ts w

ill b

e ap

plie

d as

de

sign

crit

eria

. Li

fe-c

ycle

cos

t acc

ount

ing

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith D

GS

crite

ria is

requ

ired.

□ Pe

r CO

MA

R 2

3.03

.02:

Reg

ulat

ion

.29,

all

scho

ol p

roje

cts t

hat i

nclu

de re

plac

ing

or u

pgra

ding

the

elec

trica

l sys

tem

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed a

nd c

onst

ruct

ed so

t tha

t a d

esig

nate

d pu

blic

shel

ter a

rea

can

be fu

lly p

ower

ed in

the

even

t of a

n em

erge

ncy.

Page 51: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

reki

nder

gart

en/K

inde

rgar

ten

Cla

ssro

om

Des

crip

tion

of F

acili

ties

Pl

ease

refe

r to

the

sum

mar

y of

spac

es in

the

fron

t of t

his d

ocum

ent f

or th

e sq

uare

foot

re

quire

men

ts fo

r eac

h sp

ace

desc

ribed

bel

ow. S

quar

e fo

ot a

lloca

tions

shou

ld b

e co

nsid

ered

the

stan

dard

to b

e fo

llow

ed, a

lthou

gh m

inor

dev

iatio

ns a

re p

erm

itted

. P

reki

nder

gart

en/K

inde

rgar

ten

Cla

ssro

om

□ If

the

scho

ol h

as a

Hea

d St

art p

rogr

am, t

he c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed a

s a

prek

inde

rgar

ten/

kind

erga

rten

clas

sroo

m.

□ Ea

ch ro

om sh

ould

allo

w fl

exib

ility

in c

reat

ion

of a

ctiv

ity a

reas

and

to p

rovi

de fo

r ind

ivid

ualiz

ed

inst

ruct

ion

thro

ugh

arra

ngem

ent o

f the

"ce

nter

s" a

ppro

ach.

□ A

n ar

ea sh

ould

be

desi

gnat

ed fo

r pla

cem

ent o

f a 1

2’ b

y 15

’ are

a ru

g ov

er th

e fin

ishe

d flo

or.

□ A

100

squa

re fo

ot w

alk-

in st

orag

e cl

oset

and

150

squa

re fe

et o

f gen

eral

stor

age

(cas

ewor

k th

roug

hout

the

clas

sroo

m) i

s nee

ded.

□ W

hen

poss

ible

ther

e sh

ould

be

inte

rcon

nect

ing

inte

rior d

oors

bet

wee

n al

l kin

derg

arte

n an

d pr

e-ki

nder

garte

n ro

oms.

□ A

ll pr

ekin

derg

arte

n ro

oms s

houl

d ha

ve a

n ou

tsid

e do

or o

r be

dire

ctly

acc

essi

ble

to th

e ou

tsid

e an

d co

nven

ient

to th

e m

ain

entra

nce

of th

e sc

hool

bui

ldin

g.

□ Th

e pr

ekin

derg

arte

n cl

assr

oom

s mus

t hav

e di

rect

acc

ess t

o th

e pr

ekin

derg

arte

n pl

ay a

reas

. Se

e th

e Si

te R

equi

rem

ents

sect

ion

for a

des

crip

tion

of p

lay

area

s. Th

e co

mpu

ters

shou

ld n

ot b

e lo

cate

d ne

xt to

a w

hite

boar

d w

here

mag

nets

mig

ht d

amag

e th

e ha

rdw

are

and

softw

are.

Gla

re

from

the

win

dow

s on

the

com

pute

r scr

eens

shou

ld b

e el

imin

ated

as m

uch

as p

ossi

ble.

Sec

urity

fo

r the

com

pute

rs sh

ould

be

plan

ned

in c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith th

e D

OC

. C

ompu

ter/t

echn

olog

y w

iring

m

ust b

e in

acc

orda

nce

with

MSD

E/M

CPS

gui

delin

es.

□ Ev

ery

clas

sroo

m m

ust h

ave

com

pute

r out

lets

for f

ive

stud

ent w

orks

tatio

ns a

nd o

ne te

ache

r w

orks

tatio

n. T

he b

uild

ing

info

rmat

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ions

dis

tribu

tion

syst

em a

nd o

ther

as

pect

s of t

he b

uild

ing

desi

gn m

ust c

ompl

y w

ith th

e Fe

brua

ry 2

002

revi

sion

of t

he M

SDE

Mar

ylan

d Pu

blic

Sch

ool S

tand

ards

for T

elec

omm

unic

atio

ns D

istr

ibut

ion

Syst

ems.

□ Th

e m

ain

teac

hing

wal

l lay

out s

houl

d be

in a

ccor

danc

e to

MC

PS F

acili

ties G

uide

.

□ A

sink

with

a d

rinki

ng fo

unta

in m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed, w

ith c

abin

ets a

bove

and

bel

ow.

□ In

a n

on c

lass

-siz

e re

duct

ion

scho

ol, t

he b

uilt-

in st

uden

t war

drob

e ar

ea m

ust p

rovi

de 2

8 in

divi

dual

com

partm

ents

to st

ore

stud

ents

’ bel

ongi

ngs.

The

arc

hite

ct is

to re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fa

cilit

y G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

for a

typi

cal c

ubby

des

ign.

Loc

kers

in th

e cl

assr

oom

may

be

cons

ider

ed fo

r the

kin

derg

arte

n cl

assr

oom

s.

Page 52: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

reki

nder

gart

en/K

inde

rgar

ten

Cla

ssro

om

□ In

a c

lass

-siz

e re

duct

ion

scho

ol, t

he b

uilt-

in st

uden

t war

drob

e ar

ea m

ust p

rovi

de 2

4 in

divi

dual

co

mpa

rtmen

ts to

stor

e st

uden

ts’ b

elon

ging

s. T

he a

rchi

tect

is to

refe

r to

the

MC

PS F

acili

ty

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns fo

r a ty

pica

l cub

by d

esig

n. L

ocke

rs in

the

clas

sroo

m m

ay b

e co

nsid

ered

for t

he k

inde

rgar

ten

clas

sroo

ms.

□ A

tota

l of 2

0 fe

et o

f tac

kboa

rd a

nd 1

0 fe

et o

f mag

netic

whi

tebo

ard

shou

ld b

e in

stal

led

at

eye-

leve

l hei

ght f

or sm

all c

hild

ren,

with

tack

strip

ping

alo

ng w

alls

for d

ispl

ay o

f stu

dent

wor

k.

□ Ea

ch ro

om m

ust h

ave

a to

ilet r

oom

that

is a

cces

sibl

e fr

om w

ithin

the

room

and

eas

ily a

cces

sibl

e fr

om o

utsi

de.

The

toile

t roo

m w

ill c

onta

in a

stan

dard

hei

ght t

oile

t, a

sink

with

chi

ld-h

eigh

t m

irror

, and

soap

and

tow

el d

ispe

nser

s tha

t are

acc

essi

ble

to sm

all c

hild

ren.

The

ligh

t sw

itch

shou

ld a

utom

atic

ally

turn

on

the

vent

fan.

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith w

indo

w b

linds

per

the

MC

PS d

esig

n gu

idel

ines

.

□ B

atte

ry o

pera

ted

cloc

ks w

ill b

e in

stal

led.

□ A

ll cl

assr

oom

s sho

uld

be e

quip

ped

with

a h

andi

capp

ed a

cces

sibl

e si

nk w

ith d

rinki

ng b

ubbl

er.

□ A

full-

leng

th m

irror

shou

ld b

e in

stal

led.

Page 53: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

tand

ard

Cla

ssro

om

Stan

dard

Cla

ssro

om

□ Ea

ch ro

om m

ust h

ave

an o

pen

clas

sroo

m a

rea

with

mov

eabl

e fu

rnitu

re.

□ 15

0 sq

uare

feet

of c

asew

ork

stor

age

is n

eede

d in

the

clas

sroo

m.

□ W

hen

poss

ible

ther

e sh

ould

be

inte

rcon

nect

ing

inte

rior d

oors

bet

wee

n al

l cla

ssro

oms.

□ Th

e co

mpu

ters

shou

ld n

ot b

e lo

cate

d ne

xt to

a w

hite

boar

d w

here

mag

nets

mig

ht d

amag

e th

e ha

rdw

are

and

softw

are.

Gla

re fr

om th

e w

indo

ws o

n th

e co

mpu

ter s

cree

ns sh

ould

als

o be

el

imin

ated

as m

uch

as p

ossi

ble.

Sec

urity

for t

he c

ompu

ters

shou

ld b

e pl

anne

d in

con

sulta

tion

with

the

MC

PS D

OC

. C

ompu

ter/t

echn

olog

y w

iring

mus

t be

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

DO

C/M

SDE/

OC

TO g

uide

lines

.

□ Ev

ery

clas

sroo

m m

ust h

ave

com

pute

r out

lets

for 5

stud

ent w

orks

tatio

ns a

nd 1

teac

her

wor

ksta

tion.

The

bui

ldin

g in

form

atio

n an

d co

mm

unic

atio

ns d

istri

butio

n sy

stem

and

oth

er

aspe

cts o

f the

bui

ldin

g de

sign

mus

t com

ply

with

the

late

st e

ditio

n of

MSD

E M

aryl

and

Publ

ic

Scho

ol S

tand

ards

for T

elec

omm

unic

atio

ns D

istr

ibut

ion

Syst

em.

□ T

he a

rchi

tect

shou

ld re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns fo

r the

mai

n te

achi

ng

wal

l lay

out.

□ Th

irty

built

-in in

divi

dual

com

partm

ents

in th

e w

ardr

obe

area

for s

torin

g st

uden

t per

sona

l pr

oper

ty a

re re

quire

d.

The

arch

itect

shou

ld re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns

for a

typi

cal c

ubby

des

ign

for g

rade

s K-1

and

gra

des 2

-5. L

ocke

rs in

the

hallw

ay m

ay b

e us

ed in

pl

ace

of th

e cl

assr

oom

cub

bies

.

□ If

lock

ers a

re d

esig

ned

for s

torin

g in

divi

dual

stud

ent p

rope

rty, t

he a

rchi

tect

shou

ld d

esig

n th

e fa

cilit

y w

ith 7

00 lo

cker

s if t

he c

ore

capa

city

is 6

40 a

nd 8

15 lo

cker

s if t

he c

ore

capa

city

is 7

40.

□ A

ll cl

assr

oom

s sho

uld

be e

quip

ped

with

a h

andi

capp

ed a

cces

sibl

e si

nk w

ith d

rinki

ng b

ubbl

er.

□ A

stor

age

area

is n

eede

d to

hol

d at

leas

t tw

o sc

ienc

e ki

ts (a

ppro

xim

ate

27"

x 17

" x

12"

each

) and

on

e m

ath

kit i

n ea

ch c

lass

room

.

□ G

ener

al st

orag

e sp

ace

mus

t be

built

in a

nd m

ust a

ccom

mod

ate

24- b

y 36

-inch

pap

er a

nd a

4-

draw

er fi

le c

abin

et.

Each

cla

ssro

om m

ust i

nclu

de 4

8 lin

ear f

eet o

f bui

lt-in

adj

usta

ble

shel

ving

.

□ A

smal

l loc

kabl

e te

ache

r's w

ardr

obe

mus

t be

prov

ided

, as p

er M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns.

□ D

esig

nate

d sh

elf s

pace

, not

nea

r a w

indo

w, f

or a

n aq

uariu

m/te

rrar

ium

with

nea

rby

elec

trica

l ou

tlet,

is d

esira

ble.

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith w

indo

w b

linds

. The

spec

ifica

tions

for t

he w

indo

w

blin

ds w

ill b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y D

OC

.

Page 54: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

tand

ard

Cla

ssro

om

□ El

ectri

cal a

nd d

ata

outle

ts sh

ould

be

prov

ided

in th

e ce

iling

for a

cei

ling

mou

nted

LC

D p

roje

ctor

.

□ B

atte

ry o

pera

ted

cloc

ks w

ill b

e in

stal

led.

□ Sh

elvi

ng o

r cab

inet

ry sh

ould

be

prov

ided

in e

very

teac

hing

stat

ion

for t

he V

CR

and

tele

visi

on.

A sc

hool

may

cho

ose

to p

lace

the

tele

visi

on a

nd V

CR

on

a ca

rt. A

ppro

pria

te C

CTV

rece

ptac

les

and

a du

plex

out

let s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d ne

arby

for t

he o

pera

tion

of th

e TV

and

VC

R.

Plac

emen

t of

the

TV sh

ould

be

to m

axim

ize

stud

ent v

iew

ing

and

not b

e un

duly

influ

ence

d by

ext

erio

r or

inte

rior e

xtra

neou

s lig

ht.

□ A

scho

ol m

ay c

onsi

der r

educ

ing

the

size

of e

ach

clas

sroo

m to

cre

ate

smal

l bre

ak-o

ut ro

oms i

n th

e sc

hool

. Th

e nu

mbe

r and

des

ign

of th

ese

brea

kout

room

s may

be

dete

rmin

ed b

y sc

hool

and

M

CPS

staf

f.

Page 55: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

peci

al E

duca

tion

Cla

ssro

om

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

Cla

ssro

om

□ Th

e sp

ecifi

c re

quire

men

ts a

re th

e sa

me

as th

e re

quire

men

ts fo

r sta

ndar

d cl

assr

oom

requ

irem

ents

. Pl

ease

refe

r to

the

prec

edin

g se

ctio

n fo

r the

se re

quire

men

ts.

□ Pl

ease

see

the

addi

tiona

l req

uire

men

ts se

ctio

n of

this

doc

umen

t for

add

ition

al sp

ecia

l edu

catio

n pr

ogra

m re

quire

men

ts sp

ecifi

c to

this

scho

ol.

Page 56: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

rt R

oom

Art

Roo

m

The

art

room

is

to p

rovi

de s

pace

for

tea

chin

g an

d cr

eatin

g ar

t, di

spla

ying

stu

dent

wor

k an

d ed

ucat

iona

l aid

s, an

d st

orin

g su

pplie

s and

mat

eria

ls.

The

room

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed a

s fol

low

s:

□ Th

e ar

t roo

m m

ust n

ot b

e ca

rpet

ed.

□ B

oth

art a

nd m

usic

room

s mus

t be

loca

ted

near

stud

ent r

estro

oms.

□ Fo

r te

chno

logy

acc

essi

bilit

y pu

rpos

es, t

he a

rt ro

om is

to b

e co

nsid

ered

as

a re

gula

r cl

assr

oom

w

ith a

ppro

pria

te d

ata,

CC

TV, m

odem

, and

ele

ctric

al o

utle

ts.

□ Th

e de

sign

of a

ll w

ork,

dis

play

, and

stor

age

area

s sho

uld

crea

te a

n en

viro

nmen

t tha

t is f

unct

iona

l an

d ea

sy to

cle

an.

□ Li

ghtin

g sh

ould

be

both

nat

ural

and

arti

ficia

l and

con

duci

ve to

clo

se w

ork.

□ A

doo

r to

the

outs

ide

is d

esira

ble.

□ Sp

ace

and

elec

trica

l out

lets

for t

wo

kiln

s sh

ould

be

in th

e fa

rthes

t cor

ner

of th

e st

orer

oom

with

pr

oper

ven

tilat

ion.

□ Ei

ght

dupl

ex e

lect

rical

out

lets

are

to

be p

rovi

ded

(whe

re f

easi

ble

quad

rupl

ex o

utle

ts m

ay b

e ut

ilize

d).

The

win

dow

wal

l sho

uld

have

the

follo

win

g:

□ W

indo

ws t

hat p

erm

it vi

ews o

f the

surr

ound

ing

land

scap

e.

□ B

linds

to p

erm

it ro

om d

arke

ning

.

□ Sh

elve

s und

er w

indo

ws 1

5” d

eep.

□ Ta

ck b

oard

or t

ack

strip

s abo

ve w

indo

ws i

f spa

ce p

erm

its.

Th

e te

achi

ng w

all s

houl

d ha

ve th

e fo

llow

ing:

□ Tw

o 3-

foot

wid

e by

7-f

oot t

all,

18"

deep

, she

lf se

ctio

ns fo

r sto

rage

of u

nfin

ishe

d w

ork.

□ 16

’ lo

ng b

y 4-

foot

tall

whi

tebo

ard

with

4-f

oot 6

-foo

t tal

l tac

k bo

ard

on b

oth

side

s. T

ack

and

whi

te b

oard

s sho

uld

be m

ount

ed 2

to 4

inch

es a

bove

low

shel

ving

.

□ Fo

urte

en-in

ch d

eep,

24

inch

hig

h, s

helv

ing

unde

r th

e ce

nter

of

the

16-f

oot l

ong

tack

boa

rd a

nd

whi

te b

oard

.

□ W

all m

ount

ed p

roje

ctio

n sc

reen

with

ele

ctric

al o

utle

t und

erne

ath.

The

wal

l nea

r the

ent

ranc

e sh

ould

hav

e th

e fo

llow

ing:

Page 57: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

rt R

oom

□ Th

ree

sink

s sh

ould

be

prov

ided

. Fa

ucet

s sh

ould

be

acce

ssib

le t

o st

uden

ts a

nd p

ositi

oned

to

prev

ent s

plas

hes o

nto

floor

.

□ One

teac

her s

ink

(36"

hig

h)

□ One

sin

k lo

cate

d on

a p

enin

sula

(30"

-32"

hig

h).

Peni

nsul

a is

to b

e no

long

er th

an 3

fe

et.

□ One

AD

A a

cces

sibl

e si

nk (3

0"-3

2").

□ Si

nks a

nd si

nk a

rea

shou

ld a

lso

incl

ude:

□ R

emov

able

pla

ster

trap

s

□ C

lose

d ca

bine

ts b

elow

and

abo

ve

□ C

onve

nien

tly lo

cate

d to

wel

and

soap

dis

pens

ers

□ A

t lea

st 9

fee

t of

coun

ter

spac

e (in

clud

es 1

½ f

eet o

f co

unte

r sp

ace

on b

oth

side

s of

the

sink

s)

with

roun

ded

corn

ers

□ H

ot a

nd c

old

wat

er fa

ucet

s with

bub

bler

□ A

5- t

o 7-

foot

ope

n sp

ace

is n

eede

d fo

r dry

ing

rack

(s) a

long

one

wal

l.

□ A

ppro

xim

atel

y 30

sm

ock

hook

s in

3 f

eet

of s

tagg

ered

tie

rs,

begi

nnin

g 2

feet

fro

m t

he f

loor

, sp

aced

4 in

ches

apa

rt, u

p to

48

inch

es h

igh.

(Opt

iona

l in

room

s w

here

one

end

of d

ryin

g ra

ck(s

) th

at m

easu

re 4

4 in

ches

wid

e an

d 24

inch

es d

eep

is a

cces

sibl

e, s

ince

hoo

ks c

an b

e in

stal

led

on

pegb

oard

end

s.)

Th

e w

all o

ppos

ite o

r adj

acen

t to

the

teac

hing

stat

ion

shou

ld h

ave

the

follo

win

g:

□ O

ne 6

-foo

t tal

l, 12

-foo

t lon

g ta

ck b

oard

with

24-

inch

tall,

14-

inch

dee

p sh

elvi

ng u

nits

bel

ow.

□ Tw

o or

thre

e 7-

foot

tall,

18-

inch

dee

p, 3

6-in

ch w

ide

shel

f se

ctio

ns n

ear

kiln

are

a fo

r st

orag

e of

ce

ram

ic w

ork

K

iln A

rea

□ Th

e ki

ln a

rea

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d at

the

far

end

of th

e st

orer

oom

and

sho

uld

acco

mm

odat

e tw

o ki

lns.

□ Tw

o ki

ln e

xhau

st h

oods

and

fan

s (lo

cal

switc

h) m

ust

be i

nsta

lled.

Po

sitiv

e ve

ntila

tion

(usi

ng

nega

tive

pres

sure

) is n

eede

d to

ass

ure

rem

oval

of f

umes

.

□ K

ilns

shou

ld b

e 30

inch

es w

ide,

30

inch

es d

eep

and

36 in

ches

tall.

Allo

w a

n ad

ditio

nal 6

inch

es

in d

epth

for o

peni

ng o

f the

kiln

lid.

Page 58: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

rt R

oom

□ El

ectri

cal

char

acte

ristic

s fo

r th

e ki

ln a

re 2

08 v

olt,

30 a

mps

, si

ngle

pha

se,

and

7200

wat

ts.

Prov

ide

2-50

am

p 25

0-vo

lt ou

tlets

NEM

A c

onfig

urat

ion

6-50

R.

Prov

ide

outle

t(s) o

n w

all b

ehin

d ki

ln(s

).

□ K

ilns m

ay b

e lo

cate

d in

the

far e

nd o

f the

stor

eroo

m w

ith b

uilt-

in h

ood

abov

e an

d m

etal

shel

ving

12

inch

es to

18

inch

es d

eep

on w

alls

adj

acen

t to

the

kiln

are

a.

See

note

s ab

ove

for

addi

tiona

l ki

ln in

form

atio

n.

A

rt S

tore

room

□ Th

e st

orer

oom

mus

t hav

e a

6-fo

ot w

ide,

30-

inch

tall,

and

34-

inch

dee

p w

orkt

able

imm

edia

tely

in

side

the

entra

nce

to th

e st

orer

oom

with

bui

lt-in

adj

usta

ble

shel

ves b

elow

and

14-

inch

dee

p w

all

hung

she

lvin

g ab

ove.

Thi

s ta

ble

will

acc

omm

odat

e a

30-in

ch s

quar

e pa

per c

utte

r and

sto

rage

of

larg

e ar

t re

prod

uctio

ns a

nd p

aper

s be

low

, in

3 b

anks

of

shel

ving

uni

ts 8

inc

hes

on c

ente

r, 20

-inch

es w

ide

(insi

de w

idth

).

□ O

ne o

r tw

o 6-

foot

tall

20-in

ch w

ide

pape

r sto

rage

she

lf se

ctio

n(s)

, 24

inch

es d

eep

with

she

lves

8

inch

es o

n ce

nter

to a

ccom

mod

ate

18"

x 24

" pa

per.

□ Se

ven

foot

tall

open

she

lvin

g, 1

8 in

ches

dee

p, s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d al

ong

rem

aini

ng w

alls

whe

re

spac

e pe

rmits

. Tw

elve

to fo

urte

en in

ch d

eep

sect

ions

are

acc

epta

ble

for s

ome

sect

ions

whe

re 1

8-in

ch d

eep

shel

ves w

on't

fit.

□ St

orer

oom

doo

r is t

o be

lock

able

, and

2 c

oat h

ooks

are

to b

e m

ount

ed b

ehin

d th

e do

or.

Page 59: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

M

usic

Sui

te

Mus

ic S

uite

Spa

tial N

eeds

M

usic

Roo

m (i

nclu

des 2

50 sq

. ft.

stor

age)

In

stru

men

tal M

usic

Roo

m

□ Th

e m

usic

room

and

inst

rum

enta

l mus

ic ro

om sh

ould

be

loca

ted

adja

cent

to e

ach

othe

r with

a

shar

ed st

orag

e ro

om.

□ Th

ese

room

s sho

uld

be lo

cate

d ne

ar th

e m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om to

allo

w e

asy

acce

ss to

the

plat

form

.

□ Th

e ro

oms m

ust b

e ac

oust

ical

ly tr

eate

d fo

r iso

latio

n an

d re

verb

erat

ion.

M

usic

Roo

m

□ Th

e m

usic

room

shou

ld h

ave

a cl

ear c

ircul

ar a

rea

of a

t lea

st 2

0 fe

et in

dia

met

er a

nd a

cces

s to

the

mus

ic st

orag

e ro

om.

□ A

150

-squ

are

foot

secu

re c

lose

t are

a to

stor

e in

stru

men

ts, e

quip

men

t, ch

oral

mus

ic, a

nd

inst

ruct

iona

l cha

rts is

nec

essa

ry w

ith a

cces

s fro

m th

e m

usic

room

.

□ V

aria

ble

size

d sh

elvi

ng m

ust a

llow

for s

tora

ge o

f boo

ks, r

ecor

ds, a

nd sm

all i

nstru

men

ts.

□ Th

e m

usic

room

nee

ds a

chi

ld h

eigh

t sin

k w

ith a

wor

k ar

ea a

nd d

rinki

ng fo

unta

in.

□ W

indo

w b

linds

and

a w

all-m

ount

ed re

tract

able

pro

ject

ion

scre

en a

re re

quire

d.

□ A

ppro

xim

atel

y 20

feet

of w

hite

boa

rd a

nd 4

feet

of t

ack

boar

d m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed.

Con

tinuo

us

tack

strip

s are

nee

ded

arou

nd th

e ro

om.

□ Sp

ecifi

c st

orag

e an

d sh

elvi

ng sp

ecifi

catio

ns a

re a

vaila

ble

thro

ugh

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Publ

ic

Scho

ol's

MC

PS F

acili

ty G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

.

□ Ei

ght d

uple

x el

ectri

cal o

utle

ts a

re to

be

prov

ided

(whe

re fe

asib

le, q

uadr

uple

x ou

tlets

may

be

utili

zed)

.

□ Th

is ro

om m

ust b

e ac

oust

ical

ly tr

eate

d.

□ D

oors

into

the

mus

ic ro

om a

nd st

age

plat

form

mus

t be

wid

e en

ough

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

pass

age

of a

pia

no.

Page 60: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

M

usic

Sui

te

Inst

rum

enta

l Mus

ic R

oom

□ A

secu

re c

lose

t are

a is

nee

ded

adja

cent

to th

e ro

om fo

r lar

ge in

stru

men

t sto

rage

.

□ A

sink

and

cou

nter

top

area

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed fo

r cle

anin

g an

d re

pairi

ng m

usic

al in

stru

men

ts.

□ Th

e In

stru

men

tal M

usic

Roo

m m

ust b

e so

undp

roof

ed.

□ D

oors

into

the

inst

rum

enta

l mus

ic ro

om m

ust b

e w

ide

enou

gh to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e pa

ssag

e of

a

pian

o.

Page 61: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

D

ual P

urpo

se R

oom

Dua

l Pur

pose

Roo

m

□ Th

is ro

om sh

ould

be

desi

gned

to a

ccom

mod

ate

both

art

and

mus

ic a

ctiv

ities

in th

e sc

hool

but

w

ith le

ss d

etai

l tha

n th

e re

gula

r art

and

mus

ic ro

oms.

□ So

me

acou

stic

al tr

eatm

ent s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d in

the

room

.

□ O

ne si

nk fo

r stu

dent

use

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed a

long

with

som

e co

unte

rtop

area

.

□ N

o ki

ln a

rea

is n

eede

d an

d le

ss sh

elvi

ng th

an d

escr

ibed

in th

e ar

t roo

m is

to b

e pr

ovid

ed.

□ Th

e ex

act d

etai

ls o

f the

des

ign

shou

ld b

e di

scus

sed

with

the

scho

ol st

aff a

nd c

omm

unity

.

Page 62: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

uppo

rt R

oom

s

Supp

ort R

oom

s

Larg

e In

stru

ctio

nal S

uppo

rt R

oom

□ R

oom

for a

teac

her's

des

k, lo

ckab

le fi

le c

abin

et, a

nd a

ssor

ted

size

d fu

rnitu

re is

des

ired.

□ Ev

ery

clas

sroo

m m

ust h

ave

com

pute

r out

lets

for t

wo

or th

ree

stud

ent w

orks

tatio

ns a

nd o

ne

teac

her w

orks

tatio

n. T

he b

uild

ing

info

rmat

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ions

dis

tribu

tion

syst

em a

nd

othe

r asp

ects

of t

he b

uild

ing

desi

gn m

ust c

ompl

y w

ith th

e la

test

edi

tion

of M

SDE

Mar

ylan

d Pu

blic

Sch

ool S

tand

ards

for T

elec

omm

unic

atio

ns D

istr

ibut

ion

Syst

em.

□ A

ppro

xim

atel

y 10

to 1

5 lin

ear f

eet o

f mag

netic

mar

ker b

oard

and

10

to 1

5 lin

ear f

eet o

f tac

k bo

ard,

bot

h w

ith ta

ck st

rips a

nd m

ap ra

ils a

bove

the

boar

ds, s

houl

d be

inst

alle

d in

eac

h cl

assr

oom

. M

arke

r boa

rds s

houl

d be

loca

ted

so a

s to

redu

ce g

lare

. Ta

ck st

rip is

nee

ded

on a

ll av

aila

ble

wal

ls.

The

arch

itect

shou

ld re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns fo

r the

m

ain

teac

hing

wal

l lay

out.

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

mus

t inc

lude

a m

inim

um o

f 50

linea

r fee

t of b

uilt-

in a

djus

tabl

e sh

elvi

ng fo

r bo

oks.

□ Sp

ace

for a

big

boo

k ra

ck sh

ould

with

an

incl

ine

to d

ispl

ay th

e bo

ok o

pen

and

also

for s

tora

ge

bene

ath

for s

pace

to la

y th

e bo

oks f

lat s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d.

□ A

smal

l loc

kabl

e te

ache

r's w

ardr

obe

mus

t be

prov

ided

, as p

er M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns.

□ 40

mai

lbox

es sh

ould

be

desi

gned

for s

tora

ge o

f stu

dent

wor

k su

ch a

s fol

ders

or n

oteb

ooks

.

□ Th

is c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith a

han

dica

pped

acc

essi

ble

sink

with

drin

king

bub

bler

. C

abin

ets s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d ab

ove

and

belo

w th

e co

unte

r are

a.

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith w

indo

w b

linds

. The

spec

ifica

tions

for t

he w

indo

w

blin

ds w

ill b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y D

OC

.

Spa

tial N

eeds

La

rge

Inst

ruct

iona

l Sup

port

Roo

m

Smal

l Ins

truct

iona

l Sup

port

Roo

m

Spee

ch/L

angu

age

Roo

m

Occ

upat

iona

l The

rapy

/Phy

sica

l The

rapy

(OT/

PT) R

oom

Te

stin

g/C

onfe

renc

e R

oom

In

stru

ctio

nal D

ata

Ass

ista

nt O

ffic

e Su

ppor

t Sta

ff O

ffic

es (t

wo)

Page 63: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

uppo

rt R

oom

s

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith a

retra

ctab

le p

roje

ctio

n sc

reen

(7’ x

7’)

. Th

e pr

ojec

tion

scre

en sh

ould

not

be

mou

nted

nea

r any

em

erge

ncy

light

ing

track

s. A

ll ar

eas o

f the

scre

en sh

ould

be

illu

min

ated

and

read

able

whe

n th

e lig

hts a

re d

imm

ed.

□ El

ectri

cal a

nd d

ata

outle

ts sh

ould

be

prov

ided

in th

e ce

iling

for a

cei

ling

mou

nted

LC

D p

roje

ctor

.

□ B

atte

ry o

pera

ted

cloc

ks w

ill b

e in

stal

led.

The

clo

ck sh

ould

not

be

mou

nted

beh

ind

the

proj

ectio

n sc

reen

.

Sm

all I

nstr

uctio

nal S

uppo

rt R

oom

□ R

oom

for a

teac

her's

des

k, lo

ckab

le fi

le c

abin

et, a

nd a

ssor

ted

size

d fu

rnitu

re is

des

ired.

□ Ev

ery

clas

sroo

m m

ust h

ave

com

pute

r out

lets

for t

wo

or th

ree

stud

ent w

orks

tatio

ns a

nd o

ne

teac

her w

orks

tatio

n. T

he b

uild

ing

info

rmat

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ions

dis

tribu

tion

syst

em a

nd

othe

r asp

ects

of t

he b

uild

ing

desi

gn m

ust c

ompl

y w

ith th

e la

test

edi

tion

of M

SDE

Mar

ylan

d Pu

blic

Sch

ool S

tand

ards

for T

elec

omm

unic

atio

ns D

istr

ibut

ion

Syst

em.

□ A

ppro

xim

atel

y 10

to 1

5 lin

ear f

eet o

f mag

netic

mar

ker b

oard

and

10

to 1

5 lin

ear f

eet o

f tac

k bo

ard,

bot

h w

ith ta

ck st

rips a

nd m

ap ra

ils a

bove

the

boar

ds, s

houl

d be

inst

alle

d in

eac

h cl

assr

oom

. M

arke

r boa

rds s

houl

d be

loca

ted

so a

s to

redu

ce g

lare

. Ta

ck st

rip is

nee

ded

on a

ll av

aila

ble

wal

ls.

The

arch

itect

shou

ld re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns fo

r the

m

ain

teac

hing

wal

l lay

out.

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

mus

t inc

lude

bui

lt-in

adj

usta

ble

shel

ving

und

er th

e w

indo

ws.

□ A

smal

l loc

kabl

e te

ache

r's w

ardr

obe

mus

t be

prov

ided

, as p

er M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns.

□ Th

is c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith a

han

dica

pped

acc

essi

ble

sink

with

drin

king

bub

bler

. C

abin

ets s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d ab

ove

and

belo

w th

e co

unte

r are

a.

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith w

indo

w b

linds

. The

spec

ifica

tions

for t

he w

indo

w

blin

ds w

ill b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y D

OC

.

□ Ea

ch c

lass

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith a

retra

ctab

le p

roje

ctio

n sc

reen

(7’ x

7’)

. Th

e pr

ojec

tion

scre

en sh

ould

not

be

mou

nted

nea

r any

em

erge

ncy

light

ing

track

s. A

ll ar

eas o

f the

scre

en sh

ould

be

illu

min

ated

and

read

able

whe

n th

e lig

hts a

re d

imm

ed.

□ El

ectri

cal a

nd d

ata

outle

ts sh

ould

be

prov

ided

in th

e ce

iling

for a

cei

ling

mou

nted

LC

D p

roje

ctor

.

□ B

atte

ry o

pera

ted

cloc

ks w

ill b

e in

stal

led.

The

clo

ck sh

ould

not

be

mou

nted

beh

ind

the

proj

ectio

n sc

reen

.

Page 64: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

uppo

rt R

oom

s

Spe

ech/

Lang

uage

Roo

m

□ T

his r

oom

requ

ires a

whi

tebo

ard,

tack

boa

rd, o

pen

and

clos

ed lo

ckab

le st

orag

e, o

pen

shel

ving

, an

d a

lock

able

teac

her w

ardr

obe.

□ R

oom

for a

teac

her's

des

k, lo

ckab

le fi

le c

abin

et, a

nd ta

ble

to w

ork

with

smal

l gro

ups o

f stu

dent

s is

requ

ired.

□ Th

e sp

eech

/lang

uage

room

shou

ld b

e w

ired

for a

cces

s to

one

com

pute

r wor

ksta

tion

each

.

□ Th

e sp

eech

room

mus

t be

loca

ted

on th

e fir

st fl

oor a

nd b

e ac

oust

ical

ly tr

eate

d.

□ Th

e sp

eech

room

nee

ds a

4’ x

4’ m

irror

mou

nted

to th

e w

all t

o su

pple

men

t ver

bal s

kills

trai

ning

.

□ Th

e sp

eech

room

requ

ires a

sink

with

cou

nter

spac

e.

Occ

upat

iona

l The

rapy

/Phy

sica

l The

rapy

(OT/

PT)

Roo

m

□ E

ach

room

mus

t hav

e w

hite

boar

d th

at is

mou

nted

two

feet

off

the

floor

.

□ A

tack

boa

rd, o

pen

and

clos

ed lo

ckab

le st

orag

e, o

pen

shel

ving

, and

a lo

ckab

le te

ache

r war

drob

e ar

e re

quire

d.

□ A

sink

with

cou

nter

spac

e is

requ

ired

in th

e O

T/PT

room

.

□ R

oom

for a

teac

her's

des

k, lo

ckab

le fi

le c

abin

et, a

nd a

ssor

ted

size

d fu

rnitu

re w

ith a

djus

tabl

e le

gs

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed.

□ Th

e O

T/PT

room

s sho

uld

be w

ired

for a

cces

s to

one

com

pute

r wor

ksta

tion

each

.

□ Th

e O

T/PT

requ

ires a

cei

ling

mou

nted

hoo

k fo

r a sw

ing.

Th

e O

T/PT

room

requ

ires l

ocka

ble

stor

age

with

suff

icie

nt a

rea

to h

ouse

larg

e gr

oss m

otor

eq

uipm

ent (

min

imum

of 3

5 sq

uare

feet

) suc

h as

ther

apy

balls

, sco

oter

boa

rds,

wal

kers

, bal

ance

be

ams,

ram

ps, e

tc.

Te

stin

g/C

onfe

renc

e R

oom

□ Sc

hool

and

/or c

entra

l off

ice

staf

f tes

t ind

ivid

ual s

tude

nts o

r sm

all g

roup

s of s

tude

nts.

Typ

ical

te

stin

g in

clud

es p

sych

olog

ical

, dia

gnos

tic, v

isio

n/he

arin

g, g

ifted

, and

mak

eup

test

ing

for r

equi

red

stan

dard

ized

test

s. Th

is ro

om a

lso

will

be

used

to a

ccom

mod

ate

post

-test

con

fere

nces

with

te

ache

rs a

nd/o

r par

ents

.

□ Th

is ro

om sh

ould

be

desi

gned

as a

secu

re ro

om fo

r tes

ting

mat

eria

ls a

nd sh

ould

hav

e a

coun

ter

with

lock

able

cab

inet

s abo

ve a

nd b

elow

.

□ Th

is ro

om n

eeds

aco

ustic

al tr

eatm

ent a

s wel

l as v

ideo

, voi

ce, a

nd d

ata

outle

ts.

Page 65: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

uppo

rt R

oom

s

Inst

ruct

iona

l Dat

a A

ssis

tant

Off

ice

□ Th

is ro

om is

requ

ired

for a

dat

a as

sist

ant w

ho c

ondu

cts a

sses

smen

ts, u

pdat

es in

divi

dual

stud

ent

test

scor

es, a

nd p

rovi

des r

emed

iatio

n of

stud

ents

' ski

lls.

□ Th

is ro

om h

ouse

s one

com

pute

r with

prin

ter a

nd c

ard

read

er a

nd m

ust b

e lo

ckab

le a

nd se

cure

.

□ Th

is ro

om re

quire

s som

e bu

ilt-in

cas

ewor

k w

ith sh

elve

s and

doo

rs, a

smal

l loc

kabl

e te

ache

r’s

war

drob

e, w

hite

boar

ds, a

nd v

ideo

, voi

ce, d

ata

outle

ts, n

d sp

ace

for f

ile c

abin

ets.

Sup

port

Sta

ff O

ffic

es

□ O

ffic

e sp

ace

is n

eede

d fo

r per

man

ent a

s wel

l as i

tiner

ant s

uppo

rt st

aff (

curr

icul

um c

oord

inat

or,

team

coo

rdin

ator

, soc

ial w

orke

r, ps

ycho

logi

st, a

udito

ry a

nd v

isio

n sp

ecia

lists

, and

psy

chia

trist

).

□ A

teac

her’

s war

drob

e sh

ould

be

prov

ided

for i

tiner

ant s

taff

use

.

□ V

ideo

, voi

ce, a

nd d

ata

outle

ts sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

Page 66: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

In

stru

ctio

nal M

edia

Cen

ter

Inst

ruct

iona

l Med

ia C

ente

r

S

patia

l Nee

ds

Mai

n R

esou

rce

Are

a M

ater

ials

Pre

para

tion/

Off

ice

Are

a M

edia

Sto

rage

Te

xtbo

ok S

tora

ge

Con

trol R

oom

/Sto

rage

H

ead

End

Equi

pmen

t Clo

set

LAN

Wire

Clo

set

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

refe

r to

the

MSD

E do

cum

ent,

Faci

litie

s Gui

delin

es fo

r Lib

rary

Med

ia

Prog

ram

s, 19

98 a

s a g

uide

for m

edia

cen

ter d

esig

n.

□ St

aff i

n th

e D

epar

tmen

t of E

duca

tiona

l Med

ia a

nd T

echn

olog

y m

ust a

ppro

ve sp

ecifi

c de

sign

.

□ Th

e m

edia

cen

ter i

s to

be c

entra

l to

the

inst

ruct

iona

l pro

gram

of t

he sc

hool

.

□ Th

e to

tal m

edia

com

plex

is to

be

encl

osed

and

lock

able

.

□ Th

e m

edia

cen

ter i

s to

acco

mm

odat

e m

ultip

le a

rran

gem

ents

and

use

s as f

unct

ions

cha

nge.

It

shou

ld b

e ac

oust

ical

ly d

esig

ned

for m

ultip

le a

ctiv

ities

. Fu

rnitu

re a

nd sh

elvi

ng sh

ould

hav

e ca

ster

s for

eas

y m

ovin

g, to

div

ide

one

area

from

ano

ther

, and

cre

ate

traff

ic p

atte

rns.

□ A

com

plet

e m

edia

cen

ter i

s to

incl

ude

the

follo

win

g ar

eas t

hat a

re d

escr

ibed

in th

e fo

llow

ing

sect

ions

: o

Stud

y an

d R

esea

rch

Are

a

o

Info

rmal

Rea

ding

Are

a

o

Inst

ruct

iona

l Are

a

o

Prod

uctio

n an

d G

roup

Pro

ject

Are

a o

A

dmin

istra

tive

Are

a M

ain

Res

ourc

e A

rea

□ Th

e m

ain

reso

urce

are

a sh

ould

hav

e 3

sepa

rate

ligh

ting

zone

s for

the

stor

ytel

ling

area

, the

in

stru

ctio

nal a

rea,

and

the

circ

ulat

ion

area

. Ea

ch z

one

shou

ld b

e in

depe

nden

tly o

pera

ble.

D

imm

ing

capa

bilit

ies a

re re

com

men

ded

in th

e st

oryt

ellin

g an

d in

stru

ctio

nal a

reas

.

□ Tw

o C

CTV

out

lets

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d in

the

mai

n re

sour

ce ro

om—

one

near

the

stor

ytel

ling

area

an

d on

e in

the

inst

ruct

iona

l are

a. C

CTV

rece

ptac

les a

nd e

lect

rical

out

lets

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d 44

" ap

art.

Th

e M

ain

Res

ourc

e A

rea

is to

be

subd

ivid

ed to

pro

vide

for t

he fo

llow

ing

prog

ram

act

iviti

es:

Page 67: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

In

stru

ctio

nal M

edia

Cen

ter

Stu

dy a

nd R

esea

rch

Are

a

□ Sp

ace

is n

eede

d in

the

Mai

n R

esou

rce

Are

a fo

r an

info

rmat

ion

desk

.

□ Th

is a

rea

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed w

ith te

n co

mpu

ter w

orks

tatio

ns fo

r stu

dent

use

. The

se c

ompu

ters

w

ill b

e us

ed fo

r acc

essi

ng th

e ca

talo

g as

wel

l as r

esea

rch.

□ Th

is a

rea

requ

ires s

tudy

and

rese

arch

tabl

es, r

efer

ence

mat

eria

ls, p

rofe

ssio

nal l

ibra

ry m

ater

ials

, ba

sic

colle

ctio

ns, a

nd st

acks

. In

form

al R

eadi

ng A

rea

□ Sp

ace

is n

eede

d in

the

Mai

n R

esou

rce

Are

a fo

r boo

ks a

nd p

erio

dica

ls to

enc

oura

ge li

tera

cy,

lifel

ong

lear

ning

, and

read

ing

for p

leas

ure.

□ Th

is a

rea

need

s to

prov

ide

spac

e to

seat

30

stud

ents

on

the

floor

aw

ay fr

om th

e bu

sy a

reas

for a

st

oryt

ellin

g ar

ea.

□ A

pro

ject

ion

scre

en sh

ould

be

acce

ssib

le. E

mer

genc

y lig

htin

g sh

ould

not

aff

ect t

he p

roje

ctio

n sc

reen

.

□ Zo

ne li

ghtin

g sh

ould

be

cont

rolle

d fr

om th

is a

rea.

□ A

CC

TV re

cept

acle

and

app

ropr

iate

ele

ctric

al o

utle

t sho

uld

be lo

cate

d ne

ar th

is a

rea.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct m

ay w

ant t

o de

fine

this

are

a by

arc

hite

ctur

e an

d/or

acc

ent c

arpe

ting.

□ Pi

ctur

e bo

ok sh

elvi

ng a

lso

may

hel

p de

fine

this

are

a.

Inst

ruct

iona

l Are

a

□ Sp

ace

is n

eede

d in

the

Mai

n R

esou

rce

Are

a fo

r for

mal

sea

ting

for s

mal

l, la

rge

grou

p, a

nd w

hole

cl

ass i

nstru

ctio

n.

□ A

“te

achi

ng w

all”

with

app

ropr

iate

inst

ruct

iona

l tec

hnol

ogy,

and

dis

play

spac

e is

nee

ded.

□ Th

is a

rea

shou

ld n

ot b

e lo

cate

d ne

ar a

n en

tranc

e.

□ It

shou

ld se

at 3

0 st

uden

ts a

t tab

les.

□ A

pro

ject

ion

scre

en w

ith a

ppro

pria

te fl

oor m

ount

ed o

utle

ts sh

ould

be

loca

ted

in th

is a

rea.

□ Li

ghts

in th

is a

rea

shou

ld b

e se

para

te fo

r dim

min

g w

ithou

t aff

ectin

g th

e re

fere

nce

area

.

Page 68: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

In

stru

ctio

nal M

edia

Cen

ter

Pro

duct

ion

and

Gro

up P

roje

ct A

rea

□ Sp

ace

is n

eede

d in

the

Mai

n R

esou

rce

Are

a fo

r fu

nctio

nal w

ork

and

mee

tings

for

indi

vidu

als,

team

s, an

d cl

asse

s as

wel

l as

fac

ilitie

s fo

r m

edia

pro

duct

ion

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed i

n th

e m

ain

reso

urce

are

a.

□ Th

is a

rea

allo

ws

for

indi

vidu

al s

tudy

des

ks f

or s

tude

nts

to c

arry

on

inde

pend

ent s

tudy

res

earc

h pr

ojec

ts, a

naly

ze in

form

atio

n, a

nd so

lve

prob

lem

s.

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Are

a

□ Sp

ace

is n

eede

d in

the

Mai

n R

esou

rce

Are

a fo

r the

circ

ulat

ion

desk

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

near

the

entra

nce

of th

e m

edia

cen

ter.

This

are

a ne

eds

writ

ing

spac

e, b

ook

retu

rn, c

ompu

ter w

orks

tatio

n,

file

cabi

net,

and

stor

age.

□ A

n el

ectro

nic

cata

log

area

(EC

C) s

houl

d be

loca

ted

near

the

circ

ulat

ion

desk

and

sho

uld

cont

ain

one

to tw

o co

mpu

ter w

orks

tatio

ns.

□ Th

e re

fere

nce

sect

ion

area

sho

uld

cont

ain

two

to f

our

com

pute

r w

orks

tatio

ns.

Thes

e sh

ould

be

loca

ted

near

the

elec

troni

c ca

rd c

atal

og a

nd b

e po

sitio

ned

so th

ey m

ay b

e ut

ilize

d w

ith th

e EC

C

for

dire

cted

inst

ruct

ion

to s

tude

nts

for

on-li

ne r

etrie

val s

kills

. A

ppro

pria

te d

ata,

tele

phon

e an

d el

ectri

cal

outle

ts a

s w

ell

as c

asew

ork

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed f

or t

hese

wor

ksta

tions

. C

asew

ork

shou

ld in

clud

e w

ire m

anag

emen

t, ar

ea fo

r stu

dent

boo

ks a

nd a

pul

lout

key

boar

d.

Mat

eria

ls P

repa

ratio

n/O

ffic

e A

rea

□ Th

e O

ffic

e an

d M

ater

ials

Pre

para

tion

Roo

ms m

ay b

e co

mbi

ned

into

one

room

. The

Off

ice

acce

ss

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d im

med

iate

ly b

ehin

d th

e ci

rcul

atio

n de

sk a

t the

ent

ranc

e to

the

Med

ia C

ente

r.

Plen

tiful

inte

rior w

indo

ws f

rom

thes

e ro

oms i

nto

the

Med

ia C

ente

r are

to b

e pr

ovid

ed fo

r su

perv

isio

n.

□ Th

e m

ater

ials

pre

para

tion

area

pro

vide

s for

the

prep

arat

ion

of se

vera

l typ

es o

f ins

truct

iona

l m

ater

ials

, suc

h as

tran

spar

enci

es, s

lides

, and

cha

rts.

□ Th

e m

ater

ials

pre

para

tion

area

shou

ld h

ave

corr

idor

acc

ess.

□ Th

is sp

ace

requ

ires a

ppro

pria

te c

ount

er sp

ace

for r

epai

rs, i

nclu

ding

cab

inet

ry, s

ink,

stor

age

of

tool

s and

cor

ds, a

s wel

l as e

lect

rical

and

com

pute

r rec

epta

cles

for t

estin

g eq

uipm

ent.

□ A

ppro

pria

te c

asew

ork

for s

tora

ge, c

ompu

ter w

orks

tatio

ns, d

ata,

ele

ctric

al, a

nd m

odem

re

cept

acle

s sho

uld

be p

rovi

ded.

□ Se

e m

edia

cen

ter s

peci

ficat

ions

ava

ilabl

e fr

om th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns.

Page 69: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

In

stru

ctio

nal M

edia

Cen

ter

□ Th

e of

fice

area

shou

ld in

clud

e sp

ace

for c

olla

bora

tive

plan

ning

and

pro

cess

ing

of li

brar

y m

edia

m

ater

ials

.

□ Th

e of

fice

area

mus

t be

acce

ssib

le to

the

mat

eria

ls p

repa

ratio

n ar

ea a

nd m

ain

read

ing

room

. It

shou

ld in

clud

e ap

prop

riate

cas

ewor

k fo

r a c

ompu

ter w

orks

tatio

n, b

ook

shel

ving

, and

cab

inet

ry a

s w

ell a

s pho

ne, d

ata,

and

ele

ctric

al re

cept

acle

s. A

dequ

ate

spac

e sh

ould

be

allo

cate

d fo

r the

med

ia

cent

er fi

le se

rver

. M

edia

and

Tex

tboo

k S

tora

ge

The

stor

age

area

s sho

uld

be lo

cate

d ad

jace

nt to

the

mat

eria

ls p

repa

ratio

n w

ork

area

and

shou

ld

have

the

follo

win

g sp

ecifi

catio

ns:

□ Sp

ace

is n

eede

d fo

r the

stor

age

of in

stru

ctio

nal m

ater

ials

, suc

h as

seas

onal

mat

eria

ls, m

aps a

nd

glob

es, a

nd in

stru

ctio

nal e

quip

men

t, su

ch a

s pro

ject

ors f

or d

istri

butio

n. M

inor

repa

irs, c

lean

ing,

an

d te

stin

g of

equ

ipm

ent a

re c

ompl

eted

her

e. S

pace

for m

anip

ulat

ives

, esp

ecia

lly m

athe

mat

ics

and

scie

nce,

is n

eede

d.

□ Te

xtbo

ok st

orag

e pr

ovid

es fo

r sto

rage

of t

extb

ooks

, wor

kboo

ks, a

nd c

lass

room

mat

eria

ls.

C

ontr

ol R

oom

/Sto

rage

Are

a

□ A

supp

ort r

oom

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d ad

jace

nt to

the

cont

rol r

oom

so th

e ro

om c

an se

rve

the

dual

fu

nctio

n of

a su

ppor

t spa

ce a

nd T

V st

udio

.

□ Th

e su

ppor

t roo

m u

sed

as a

TV

stud

io sh

ould

hav

e ad

equa

te e

lect

rical

out

lets

and

aco

ustic

al

treat

men

t.

□ Se

e st

udio

spec

ifica

tions

for m

edia

cen

ter c

omm

unic

atio

n la

bs a

vaila

ble

from

the

MC

PS F

acili

ty

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns.

Tele

com

mun

icat

ion

Equi

pmen

t C

lose

t

□ Th

is ro

om is

to b

e lo

cate

d in

or n

ear t

he in

stru

ctio

nal m

edia

cen

ter.

□ It

shou

ld h

ave

corr

idor

acc

ess a

nd b

e ce

ntra

lly lo

cate

d in

the

scho

ol.

□ Sp

ecifi

catio

ns fo

r thi

s spa

ce a

re a

vaila

ble

from

the

MC

PS F

acili

ty G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

. S

helv

ing

Req

uire

men

ts

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct is

to re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns fo

r the

mat

eria

l to

be u

sed

for t

he sh

elvi

ng in

the

med

ia c

ente

r res

ourc

e ar

ea a

nd st

orag

e ar

ea.

Page 70: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

In

stru

ctio

nal M

edia

Cen

ter

□ Th

e sh

elvi

ng sh

ould

be

inte

rcha

ngea

ble

with

in st

anda

rd u

prig

ht w

all u

nits

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

MC

PS sp

ecifi

catio

ns (m

axim

um h

eigh

t and

isla

nd sh

elvi

ng re

quire

men

ts a

re a

vaila

ble

from

the

MC

PS F

acili

ty G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

).

□ Lo

w sh

elvi

ng is

des

irabl

e fo

r sig

ht a

nd sa

fety

reas

ons w

hen

extra

shel

ving

is n

eede

d.

Page 71: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

In

stru

ctio

nal M

edia

Cen

ter

□ Sh

elvi

ng is

to b

e al

loca

ted

on th

e av

erag

e as

follo

ws:

Li

near

Fee

t B

ooks

70

0 Pi

ctur

e B

ooks

(with

div

ider

s)

165

Mag

azin

es (w

ith sp

ace

for b

ack

issu

es)

20

New

Boo

k/In

tere

st D

ispl

ay

10

Med

ia C

ente

r Sto

rage

(20-

24”

dept

h)

As s

pace

allo

ws

Text

book

Sto

rage

(12-

18”

dept

h)

As s

pace

allo

ws

Page 72: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

C

ompu

ter

Labo

rato

ry

Com

pute

r La

bora

tory

□ Th

is ro

om sh

ould

hav

e di

rect

acc

ess t

o th

e In

stru

ctio

nal M

edia

Cen

ter.

□ Th

e co

mpu

ter

labo

rato

ry s

houl

d be

zon

ed f

or in

depe

nden

t air-

cond

ition

ing

durin

g tim

es w

hen

the

rest

of t

he b

uild

ing

is c

lose

d.

□ Th

e m

inim

um d

imen

sion

s of

the

room

sho

uld

prov

ide

for a

n un

inte

rrup

ted

area

of 2

5’ x

32’

so

that

the

com

pute

r lab

orat

ory

may

be

desi

gned

with

the

follo

win

g re

quire

men

ts.

□ Ea

ch c

ompu

ter l

abor

ator

y sh

ould

acc

omm

odat

e 32

stud

ent w

orks

tatio

ns.

□ Th

e la

yout

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

with

fou

r ro

ws

with

eig

ht c

ompu

ters

in

each

row

fac

ing

the

teac

hing

wal

l. E

ach

row

sho

uld

have

a c

ente

r ais

le th

at s

epar

ates

eac

h ro

w, w

ith fo

ur c

ompu

ters

on

eith

er si

de o

f the

ais

le.

□ Fi

le se

rver

and

prin

ters

are

to b

e lo

cate

d ne

ar te

ache

r’s d

esk

or in

off

ice.

□ A

teac

her’

s war

drob

e an

d st

orag

e ca

bine

ts sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

□ Th

e te

achi

ng w

all s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

acc

omm

odat

e a

Prom

ethe

an b

oard

. Th

e te

achi

ng w

all

layo

ut w

ill b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y th

e D

ivis

ion

of C

onst

ruct

ion.

□ Ta

ckbo

ards

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed in

the

labo

rato

ry.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

con

sult

with

the

OC

TO/D

OC

for t

he la

test

tech

nolo

gy re

quire

men

ts.

Page 73: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

Phy

sica

l Edu

catio

n Th

e gy

mna

sium

has

two

maj

or p

urpo

ses:

To p

rovi

de a

n in

door

faci

lity

for t

he p

hysi

cal e

duca

tion

inst

ruct

iona

l pro

gram

. •

To p

rovi

de fo

r stu

dent

and

com

mun

ity re

crea

tion

durin

g af

ter s

choo

l hou

rs, w

eeke

nds,

sum

mer

s, an

d ho

liday

s.

S

patia

l Nee

ds

Gym

nasi

um (7

4’x5

0’)

Phys

ical

Edu

catio

n O

ffic

e St

orag

e R

oom

s Lo

bby

Are

a O

utdo

or S

tora

ge

Gym

nasi

um

□ Th

e lo

catio

n of

the

gym

nasi

um sh

ould

be

near

the

play

are

as, d

irect

ly a

cces

sibl

e fr

om a

cor

ridor

, an

d ea

sily

acc

essi

ble

from

the

park

ing

lots

.

□ B

uffe

ring

the

gym

nasi

um w

ith a

cor

ridor

or r

elat

ed sp

aces

is re

quire

d to

sepa

rate

gym

nasi

um

nois

e fr

om th

e re

st o

f the

scho

ol.

□ Th

e ph

ysic

al e

duca

tion

offic

e sh

ould

be

adja

cent

to th

e gy

mna

sium

and

lobb

y.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

refe

r to

deta

iled

requ

irem

ents

pro

vide

d by

MC

PS F

acili

ty G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

.

□ A

ny w

indo

ws i

nto

the

gym

nasi

um sh

ould

be

orie

nted

nor

th a

nd so

uth

so th

at d

irect

eas

t-wes

t su

nlig

ht d

oes n

ot im

pact

pla

y in

the

gym

nasi

um.

How

ever

, win

dow

s sho

uld

not b

e pl

aced

in th

e en

d w

alls

.

□ Th

e gy

mna

sium

shou

ld b

e A

DA

acc

essi

ble

from

with

in a

nd w

ithou

t (ac

cess

from

insi

de g

ym to

pl

ayfie

lds)

.

□ A

cei

ling

clea

ranc

e of

18-

20 fe

et fr

ee o

f gird

ers,

pipe

s, he

atin

g ve

nts,

light

s an

d cu

rtain

sup

ports

is

requ

ired.

□ N

o le

dges

or s

ills s

houl

d be

cre

ated

ove

r 6' i

n he

ight

that

wou

ld m

ake

it di

ffic

ult t

o re

triev

e a

ball.

□ G

laze

d til

e on

the

wal

ls m

ust c

over

at l

east

seve

n fe

et fr

om th

e flo

ors.

□ If

the

gym

nasi

um is

a c

omm

unity

size

d gy

mna

sium

(84’

x 75

’) th

en a

vin

yl-m

esh

curta

in to

di

vide

the

floor

are

a in

to tw

o eq

ual s

ize

spac

es sh

ould

be

prov

ided

. It

mus

t be

the

type

that

can

be

ele

ctric

ally

rolle

d to

the

ceili

ng fo

r sto

rage

. If

the

gym

nasi

um h

as a

div

ider

cur

tain

, a c

lock

w

ith a

pro

tect

ive

wire

cov

erin

g sh

ould

be

prov

ided

on

both

end

s of t

he ro

om.

Page 74: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

□ A

dequ

ate

light

ing

in th

e gy

mna

sium

is re

quire

d. T

he li

ghtin

g sh

ould

be

secu

rely

mou

nted

and

gu

arde

d to

pre

vent

dam

age

by b

alls

with

key

lock

switc

hes t

o co

ntro

l the

ligh

ting.

□ A

min

imum

num

ber o

f win

dow

s to

prev

ent g

lare

and

gla

ss b

reak

age

is re

ques

ted.

□ A

cous

tical

trea

tmen

t of w

alls

and

cei

ling

is re

quire

d an

d m

ust b

e ab

le to

with

stan

d da

mag

e by

ba

lls.

□ V

entil

atio

n eq

uipm

ent m

ust n

ot in

hibi

t use

of t

he sp

ace

for a

udito

rium

pur

pose

s.

□ A

woo

d flo

or sh

ould

be

inst

alle

d in

the

gym

nasi

um.

Strip

ing

for b

aske

tbal

l, vo

lleyb

all,

and

floor

ga

mes

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed.

(i.e.

hop

scot

ch a

nd fo

ur sq

uare

)

□ G

raph

ics o

r app

rove

d w

ords

shou

ld b

e pa

inte

d on

the

gym

nasi

um w

alls

. Th

e sc

hool

may

cho

ose

from

an

appr

oved

cur

ricul

um li

st o

f wor

ds to

pai

nt o

n th

e gy

mna

sium

wal

ls.

The

list o

f wor

ds

will

be

prov

ided

by

MC

PS st

aff.

□ A

whi

tebo

ard,

4’x

6’, w

ith n

o le

dge

is re

quire

d.

□ Se

para

te h

eatin

g so

urce

or c

ontro

ls to

per

mit

use

whe

n th

e re

mai

ning

par

t of t

he b

uild

ing

is n

ot

occu

pied

is re

quire

d.

□ R

eces

sed

door

han

dles

are

requ

ired.

□ D

oorw

ay c

ente

r pos

ts m

ust b

e re

mov

able

to a

llow

for t

he p

assa

ge o

f equ

ipm

ent.

□ A

rece

ssed

fire

ala

rm b

ox o

r cov

ered

fire

ala

rm b

ox, p

refe

rabl

y in

a c

orne

r of t

he ro

om n

eeds

to

be p

rovi

ded.

□ Tw

o ca

ll bu

ttons

loca

ted

at o

ppos

ite si

des o

f the

gym

nasi

um a

re re

quire

d to

con

tact

the

mai

n of

fice.

□ A

clo

ck w

ith a

pro

tect

ive

wire

cov

erin

g sh

ould

be

prov

ided

on

a si

dew

all o

f the

gym

nasi

um.

The

fire

extin

guis

her,

if m

ount

ed in

the

gym

nasi

um, s

houl

d be

rece

ssed

into

the

wal

l.

□ W

all s

afet

y pa

ddin

g m

ust b

e m

ount

ed u

nder

eac

h ba

sket

ball

back

stop

with

16

feet

und

er e

nd

bask

etba

ll ba

ckst

ops a

nd 1

2 fe

et u

nder

side

bas

ketb

all b

acks

tops

with

nyl

on n

ets.

□ D

oors

or o

peni

ngs s

houl

d no

t be

dire

ctly

beh

ind

bask

etba

ll ba

ckst

ops.

□ Fa

n-sh

aped

bas

ketb

all b

acks

top,

adj

usta

ble

from

8 fe

et to

10

feet

, mus

t be

mou

nted

four

feet

fr

om th

e si

dew

alls

to p

rovi

de tw

o eq

ual s

ized

side

cou

rts.

The

back

stop

s mus

t be

of a

lum

inum

co

mpo

sitio

n. C

olla

psib

le ri

ms m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed.

□ A

bas

ketb

all b

acks

top,

adj

usta

ble

from

8 fe

et to

10

feet

, mus

t be

mou

nted

on

each

end

wal

l for

fu

ll co

urt p

lay.

The

fan-

shap

ed b

acks

tops

mus

t be

of a

lum

inum

com

posi

tion.

Col

laps

ible

rim

s m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed.

Page 75: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

□ A

han

d cr

ank

mus

t be

prov

ided

for t

he a

djus

tabl

e ba

sket

ball

back

stop

s if t

hey

are

not o

pera

ted

elec

trica

lly.

□ Fo

ur c

limbi

ng ro

pes (

1 kn

otte

d, 3

pla

in) w

ith h

oist

loca

ted

6 fe

et fr

om th

e gr

ound

and

safe

ty

cabl

es lo

cate

d aw

ay fr

om c

eilin

g lig

hts a

nd b

aske

tbal

l bac

ksto

ps sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

□ O

ne 8

-foo

t sem

i-guy

ed (w

all m

ount

ed) h

oriz

onta

l bar

with

safe

ty c

hain

and

floo

r pla

tes s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d. T

he M

CPS

shad

e sh

op w

ill p

rovi

de sa

fety

pad

ding

.

□ O

ne p

air o

f vol

leyb

all a

lum

inum

upr

ight

s and

one

cen

ter v

olle

ybal

l alu

min

um u

prig

ht (i

nser

tion

type

) mus

t be

prov

ided

. H

eavy

-dut

y ne

t rat

chet

and

rem

ovab

le c

rank

han

dle

shou

ld b

e in

clud

ed.

□ Fi

ve so

lid b

rass

floo

r pla

tes a

nd fl

oor s

leev

es n

eed

to b

e in

stal

led.

Tw

o vo

lleyb

all n

ets,

32"

in

leng

th w

ith e

nd sl

eeve

s for

woo

den

dow

els s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d.

□ Tw

o po

rtabl

e ga

me

stan

dard

s are

requ

ired.

□ A

wal

l-mou

nted

, chi

n up

bar

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed.

The

low

est b

ar h

eigh

t sho

uld

be

appr

oxim

atel

y 5

feet

from

the

floor

.

□ C

ompu

ter d

ata/

CC

TV/e

lect

rical

/net

wor

k re

cept

acle

s on

oppo

site

wal

ls o

f the

gym

nasi

um a

re

requ

ired.

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

Off

ice

The

follo

win

g ite

ms a

re re

quire

d in

the

phys

ical

edu

catio

n of

fice:

□ N

on-b

reak

able

win

dow

to th

e gy

mna

sium

, low

eno

ugh

to v

iew

stud

ents

, is r

equi

red.

□ N

on-b

reak

able

win

dow

to th

e lo

bby

for s

uper

visi

on, l

ow e

noug

h to

vie

w st

uden

ts, i

s req

uire

d.

□ To

ilet a

nd sh

ower

faci

litie

s are

requ

ired.

□ C

ompu

ter/T

elep

hone

/Cab

le T

V o

utle

ts c

onne

cted

to th

e sc

hool

-wid

e ne

twor

k ar

e re

quire

d.

□ V

enet

ian

blin

ds fo

r win

dow

s are

requ

ired.

□ V

CT

floor

ing

is re

quire

d.

□ A

cal

l but

ton

the

mai

n of

fice

is re

quire

d.

□ Th

ree

full

size

clo

thin

g lo

cker

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed.

□ El

ectri

cal o

utle

ts.

□ A

tack

boa

rd sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

□ A

wal

l-mou

nted

clo

ck sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

Page 76: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

□ A

smal

l clo

set w

ith sh

elve

s sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

in th

is o

ffic

e.

Sto

rage

Roo

ms

□ A

ll of

the

stor

age

room

s req

uire

8-f

oot d

oors

and

12-

foot

cei

ling

heig

hts w

ith a

flus

h th

resh

old.

□ Th

e la

rge

stor

age

room

requ

ires 8

-foo

t dou

ble

door

s with

no

cent

er p

ost a

nd m

ust b

e ab

le to

ac

com

mod

ate

a se

t of p

aral

lel b

ars.

□ Th

e la

rge

stor

age

room

mus

t con

tain

shel

ves,

6 fe

et h

igh

and

18 in

ches

dee

p, m

ount

ed o

n at

leas

t tw

o w

alls

. Th

e sh

elve

s mus

t be

adju

stab

le a

fter i

nsta

llatio

n.

□ B

oth

of th

e sm

all s

tora

ge c

lose

ts m

ust c

onta

in sh

elve

s, 6

feet

hig

h 18

inch

es d

eep,

mou

nted

on

the

two

side

and

bac

k w

alls

. Th

e sh

elve

s mus

t be

adju

stab

le a

fter i

nsta

llatio

n.

□ Tw

o vo

lleyb

all w

all r

acks

shou

ld b

e in

stal

led

in th

e sm

all s

tora

ge c

lose

t des

igna

ted

for

com

mun

ity u

se.

Each

rack

will

hol

d tw

o up

right

s.

□ Th

e la

rge

stor

age

clos

et m

ust h

ave

a le

ngth

that

will

acc

omm

odat

e a

12' l

ong

bala

nce

beam

. Lo

bby

Are

a

□ Se

para

te to

ilet r

oom

s for

boy

s and

girl

s sho

uld

be lo

cate

d in

the

lobb

y.

□ A

n el

ectri

c w

ater

coo

ler a

nd p

ublic

tele

phon

e sh

ould

be

loca

ted

in th

e lo

bby

area

.

□ Si

x fe

et o

f tac

k bo

ard

shou

ld b

e in

stal

led

in th

e lo

bby

area

.

□ Th

e w

indo

w b

etw

een

the

lobb

y an

d ph

ysic

al e

duca

tion

offic

e m

ust b

e lo

w e

noug

h to

vie

w

peop

le in

the

lobb

y.

□ A

con

trol g

ate

to se

para

te th

e gy

mna

sium

, lob

by a

rea,

and

rest

room

s fro

m th

e re

st o

f the

scho

ol

durin

g af

ter-

hour

s is r

equi

red.

Page 77: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

M

ultip

urpo

se R

oom

and

Pla

tfor

m

Mul

tipur

pose

Roo

m a

nd P

latf

orm

S

patia

l Nee

ds

Mul

tipur

pose

Roo

m

Plat

form

C

hair

Stor

age

Tabl

e St

orag

e M

ultip

urpo

se R

oom

□ Th

e m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om sh

ould

hav

e a

ceili

ng h

eigh

t of 1

2–14

feet

.

□ A

bui

ldin

g se

rvic

e ut

ility

clo

set s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d ne

ar th

e en

tranc

e to

the

mul

tipur

pose

room

fo

r con

veni

ent l

unch

cle

anup

s.

□ Ta

ble

stor

age

and

chai

r sto

rage

mus

t be

loca

ted

adja

cent

to th

e m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om.

□ Ex

its fr

om th

e m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om m

ust b

e su

ffic

ient

to a

llow

max

imum

seat

ing.

□ To

ilet r

oom

s and

an

elec

tric

wat

er c

oole

r sho

uld

be n

ear t

he m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om to

allo

w fo

r pu

blic

use

.

□ A

udie

nces

nee

d to

be

able

to h

ear a

nd se

e pr

esen

tatio

ns fr

om a

ll lo

catio

ns in

the

room

.

□ V

entil

atio

n eq

uipm

ent n

oise

mus

t not

inhi

bit u

se o

f the

spac

e fo

r aud

itoriu

m p

urpo

ses.

□ A

cous

tical

trea

tmen

t is n

eede

d.

□ Pr

oper

ligh

ting

and

soun

d am

plifi

catio

n ar

e re

quire

d.

□ Ea

ch si

de o

f the

rise

rs a

t the

mul

tipur

pose

room

floo

r lev

el sh

ould

be

equi

pped

with

C

CTV

/dat

a/vo

ice/

mod

em/e

lect

rical

rece

ptac

les.

□ Li

ghtin

g, w

indo

ws,

fire

alar

m b

ox, c

lock

, and

cei

ling

mus

t be

prot

ecte

d to

pre

vent

dam

age

by

balls

.

□ O

utdo

or p

lay

area

s sho

uld

be a

cces

sibl

e fr

om th

e m

ultip

urpo

se ro

om.

Chi

ldre

n sh

ould

not

hav

e to

cro

ss d

rivew

ays o

r par

king

lots

to a

cces

s the

pla

y ar

eas.

□ A

n au

dio

loop

syst

em sh

ould

be

prov

ided

for h

earin

g im

paire

d st

uden

ts; g

uide

lines

are

ava

ilabl

e th

roug

h th

e D

ivis

ion

of C

onst

ruct

ion.

□ A

n in

depe

nden

t sou

nd sy

stem

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed in

the

mul

tipur

pose

room

.

□ A

cal

l but

ton

to th

e m

ain

offic

e sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

Page 78: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

M

ultip

urpo

se R

oom

and

Pla

tfor

m

Pla

tfor

m

□ Th

e pl

atfo

rm sh

ould

hav

e a

pros

ceni

um o

peni

ng 2

4 fe

et w

ide.

The

dep

th is

to b

e 15

feet

dee

p.

The

plat

form

floo

r is t

o be

thre

e ris

ers a

bove

the

mul

tipur

pose

room

floo

r. A

full

set o

f pla

tform

cu

rtain

s is t

o be

pro

vide

d. A

n 8'

x10'

mot

oriz

ed p

roje

ctio

n sc

reen

is to

be

prov

ided

. Pla

tform

st

eps m

ust N

OT

be c

arpe

ted.

□ Th

e pl

atfo

rm m

ust b

e ac

cess

ible

to th

e ph

ysic

ally

han

dica

pped

.

□ Ea

ch si

de o

f the

pla

tform

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith C

CTV

/dat

a/vo

ice/

mod

em/e

lect

rical

re

cept

acle

s. C

hair

and

Tab

le S

tora

ge

□ St

orag

e ro

oms a

re re

quire

d fo

r the

stor

ing

the

tabl

es in

the

mul

tipur

pose

room

and

fold

ing

chai

rs.

Page 79: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Fo

od S

ervi

ces

Food

Ser

vice

s

□ Th

e ki

tche

n is

ope

rate

d as

a "

finis

hing

kitc

hen"

and

shou

ld in

clud

e an

are

a fo

r dry

stor

age,

a

man

ager

's w

orks

tatio

n, to

ilet f

acili

ties,

prep

arat

ion

and

serv

ing

area

, and

a re

ceiv

ing

area

for

daily

del

iver

ies.

□ A

shel

tere

d do

ck is

pre

ferr

ed a

nd sh

ould

be

sepa

rate

from

oth

er sc

hool

rece

ivin

g.

□ D

eliv

ery

flow

pat

h m

ust b

e cl

ear o

f pre

para

tion

area

.

□ Th

e tra

sh ro

om sh

ould

be

sepa

rate

from

the

rest

of t

he b

uild

ing

i.e. n

o co

mm

on w

alls

.

□ Th

e tra

sh ro

om sh

ould

not

be

acce

ssed

from

the

kitc

hen.

□ A

ir co

nditi

onin

g m

ust b

e av

aila

ble

at a

ll tim

es in

ele

men

tary

kitc

hens

, sto

rage

, and

off

ice.

□ C

ode

requ

irem

ents

for l

ight

ing,

surf

aces

, and

equ

ipm

ent m

ust b

e m

et.

Thes

e re

quire

men

ts a

re

incl

uded

in th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns.

□ W

indo

ws m

ust h

ave

scre

ens.

□ R

ecei

ving

doo

r sho

uld

be 4

8” w

ide

and

mus

t be

self-

clos

ing

with

pee

phol

e an

d do

orbe

ll to

m

anag

er’s

off

ice.

□ A

n ea

sy to

mop

, slip

resi

stan

t qua

rry

tile

floor

is re

quire

d. C

olor

of g

rout

shou

ld b

e th

e sa

me

or

dark

er th

an th

e co

lor o

f the

floo

r.

□ Th

ere

shou

ld b

e di

rect

acc

ess t

o bo

th th

e ha

llway

and

the

mul

tipur

pose

room

to fa

cilit

ate

one-

way

circ

ulat

ion

thro

ugh

the

serv

ing

line.

□ A

min

imum

9’ c

eilin

g he

ight

is re

com

men

ded.

□ A

bui

ldin

g se

rvic

e cl

oset

with

floo

r typ

e m

op b

asin

shal

l be

loca

ted

outs

ide

the

kitc

hen

but

read

ily a

cces

sibl

e to

the

kitc

hen.

□ A

ded

icat

ed c

ircui

t is r

equi

red

for t

he c

ash

regi

ster

with

und

er th

e flo

or c

ondu

it fo

r con

nect

ion

to

the

com

pute

r in

the

man

ager

’s o

ffic

e.

S

ervi

ng A

rea

□ A

26

ft. lo

ng se

rvin

g lin

e w

ith 3

-ft.

clea

ranc

e at

eac

h en

d sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

□ Th

e co

lor s

elec

tion

will

be

appr

oved

by

Food

Ser

vice

s.

□ A

sing

le d

oor r

efrig

erat

or a

nd m

icro

wav

e ov

en o

n a

cart

adja

cent

to th

e se

rvic

e ar

ea is

nee

ded.

□ A

wal

l clo

ck a

nd ta

ck b

oard

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d on

a w

all s

o it

is v

isib

le fr

om th

e se

rvin

g lin

e w

all.

Page 80: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Fo

od S

ervi

ces

Wal

k-in

Coo

ler/

Free

zer

□ A

7' 9

" x

8' 8

1/2

" co

oler

is re

quire

d.

□ A

7' 9

" x

10’ 8

1/2

" fr

eeze

r with

a h

eigh

t of 8

' 6"

is re

quire

d.

□ A

mob

ile p

olym

er sh

elvi

ng a

nd d

unna

ge is

requ

ired.

□ A

roof

top

com

pres

sor i

s req

uire

d.

Dry

Sto

rage

□ Th

e re

com

men

ded

dim

ensi

on fo

r the

dry

stor

age

area

is 1

2’ x

16’

.

□ A

mob

ile p

olym

er sh

elvi

ng a

nd d

unna

ge is

requ

ired.

□ A

dequ

ate

ceili

ng h

eigh

t for

top

shel

f sto

rage

shou

ld b

e co

nsid

ered

.

□ Th

is sp

ace

shou

ld b

e to

tally

secu

re a

nd fr

ee o

f roo

f acc

ess l

adde

rs o

r ele

ctric

al p

anel

s.

□ Lo

ckin

g ca

bine

ts fo

r che

mic

al st

orag

e sh

ould

be

prov

ided

. M

anag

er‘s

Off

ice

□ V

isib

ility

to d

eliv

ery

and

serv

ing

area

is re

quire

d.

□ Th

e of

fice

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d aw

ay o

r pro

tect

ed fr

om o

utsi

de d

oor d

raft.

□ D

esk

(NIC

), fil

e (N

IC),

tele

phon

e, ta

ck b

oard

, and

LA

N a

cces

s are

requ

ired.

To

ilet

Roo

m

□ A

han

d si

nk w

ith so

ap a

nd to

wel

dis

pens

er, s

anita

ry n

apki

n di

spos

al, a

nd 3

full-

heig

ht lo

cker

s ar

e re

quire

d.

Pre

para

tion

Are

a

□ A

roll-

in d

oubl

e co

nvec

tion

oven

is re

quire

d.

□ A

n ov

en c

art a

nd d

olly

(2 e

ach)

are

requ

ired.

□ A

hal

f siz

e ra

nge

is re

quire

d.

□ A

hea

t rem

oval

exh

aust

hoo

d is

requ

ired.

Page 81: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

Fo

od S

ervi

ces

□ W

ork

tabl

es, o

ne 6

ft. a

nd th

e ot

her 8

ft. w

ith 2

dra

wer

s eac

h, u

nder

the

tabl

e ar

e ne

eded

.

□ A

rling

ton

wire

bas

kets

(500

eac

h) a

nd d

ollie

s (10

eac

h) a

re re

quire

d.

□ H

and

sink

with

ped

als a

nd so

ap a

nd to

wel

dis

pens

ers t

hat m

eet t

he c

ode

requ

irem

ents

are

ne

eded

.

□ A

thre

e co

mpa

rtmen

t sin

k, 2

4” x

24”

x 1

4”, w

ith 2

4 in

ch d

rain

boar

ds, i

s req

uire

d. D

ispo

sal i

n dr

ainb

oard

with

pre

-rin

se sp

ray

is re

quire

d.

□ A

6-f

oot l

ouve

red

shel

f abo

ve w

ith h

ooks

is re

quire

d.

□ A

mob

ile w

arm

er to

acc

omm

odat

e A

rling

ton

bask

ets i

s nee

ded.

□ Tw

o ut

ility

car

ts a

re re

quire

d.

Page 82: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

dmin

istr

atio

n S

uite

Adm

inis

trat

ion

suite

Spa

tial N

eeds

G

ener

al O

ffic

e W

orkr

oom

C

ode

Red

/Cod

e B

lue

Com

man

d C

ente

r Pr

inci

pal’s

Off

ice

Ass

ista

nt P

rinci

pal’s

Off

ice

Con

fere

nce

Roo

m

Cou

nsel

or’s

Off

ice

Tele

phon

e R

oom

St

orag

e R

oom

R

ecor

ds R

oom

□ Th

e ad

min

istra

tion

suite

mus

t be

loca

ted

with

goo

d ac

cess

from

the

mai

n en

tranc

e of

the

scho

ol

and

visu

al o

vers

ight

of t

he m

ain

entra

nce

and

bus d

rop-

off a

rea.

□ Th

e su

ite m

ust b

e a

natu

ral f

irst s

top

for v

isito

rs to

the

scho

ol a

nd m

ust,

ther

efor

e, h

ave

dire

ct

corr

idor

acc

ess.

A se

curit

y ve

stib

ule

mus

t be

desi

gned

so th

at a

ll vi

sito

rs m

ust e

nter

the

gene

ral

offic

e to

che

ck in

bef

ore

ente

ring

the

scho

ol.

□ Sp

aces

nee

d to

be

arra

nged

for s

tude

nt a

nd v

isito

r flo

w a

nd fo

r eff

icie

nt u

se b

y of

fice

staf

f.

□ Th

e ge

nera

l off

ice

is to

be

treat

ed a

s the

cen

ter o

f the

adm

inis

tratio

n su

ite w

ith d

irect

acc

ess t

o th

e pr

inci

pal's

off

ice,

the

wor

kroo

m, a

nd th

e he

alth

suite

.

□ A

coa

t clo

set i

s to

be p

rovi

ded

for o

ffic

e st

aff a

nd v

isito

rs.

□ Th

e A

dmin

istra

tion

suite

shou

ld b

e ca

rpet

ed.

□ Su

ffic

ient

ele

ctric

al o

utle

ts a

re to

be

prov

ided

(whe

re fe

asib

le, q

uadr

uple

x ou

tlets

may

be

utili

zed)

as w

ell a

s CC

TV re

cept

acle

for t

he g

ener

al o

ffic

e, p

rinci

pal's

, and

ass

ista

nt p

rinci

pal's

of

fices

.

□ A

gla

ss d

ispl

ay c

ase

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d in

the

vest

ibul

e of

the

Adm

inis

tratio

n su

ite e

ntra

nce.

□ Th

e ad

min

istra

tion

suite

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed w

ith se

para

te to

ilet r

oom

s. If

the

scho

ol c

hoos

es,

one

of th

ese

toile

t roo

ms m

ay b

e lo

cate

d in

the

prin

cipa

l’s o

ffic

e.

G

ener

al O

ffic

e

□ A

cou

nter

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed n

ear t

he e

ntra

nce

to g

reet

and

sepa

rate

vis

itors

from

staf

f and

to

prov

ide

a pl

ace

to w

rite.

□ Sp

ace

for t

wo

to th

ree

staf

f per

sons

is re

quire

d be

hind

the

coun

ter.

Page 83: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

dmin

istr

atio

n S

uite

□ Th

e ge

nera

l off

ice

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith a

staf

f bul

letin

boa

rd.

W

orkr

oom

□ Th

e lo

catio

n of

mai

lbox

es sh

ould

not

cre

ate

cong

estio

n by

impe

ding

the

smoo

th fl

ow o

f tra

ffic

in

the

gene

ral o

ffic

e an

d ha

llway

s.

□ C

abin

etry

app

ropr

iate

for s

torin

g a

varie

ty o

f off

ice

and

scho

ol su

pplie

s sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

alon

g on

e w

all o

f the

wor

kroo

m.

□ A

por

tion

of c

ount

erto

p is

to b

e m

ore

than

30

inch

wid

e to

acc

omm

odat

e a

larg

e pa

per c

utte

r.

□ Sp

ace

adeq

uate

for a

larg

e co

pyin

g m

achi

ne w

ith n

eces

sary

ele

ctric

serv

ice

and

vent

ilatio

n is

re

quire

d.

□ A

sink

is n

eede

d in

the

wor

kroo

m.

□ Th

ere

shou

ld b

e di

rect

acc

ess t

o a

corr

idor

from

the

wor

kroo

m.

□ Th

e w

orkr

oom

shou

ld b

e tre

ated

aco

ustic

ally

to k

eep

mac

hine

and

wor

k no

ises

at l

ow le

vels

. C

omm

and

Cen

ter

□ A

n in

terio

r roo

m in

the

scho

ol n

eeds

to b

e de

sign

ated

as t

he c

omm

and

cent

er fo

r Cod

e R

ed/C

ode

Blu

e em

erge

ncie

s. In

man

y sc

hool

s, th

e w

orkr

oom

in th

e ad

min

istra

tion

suite

may

serv

e th

is

purp

ose.

The

room

can

not b

e on

an

outs

ide

wal

l.

□ Th

e ro

om d

esig

nate

d as

the

com

man

d ce

nter

mus

t hav

e al

l dat

a an

d co

mm

unic

atio

n eq

uipm

ent

incl

udin

g da

ta, c

able

, pho

ne, a

nd p

ublic

add

ress

(PA

) sys

tem

.

□ Th

e PA

con

sole

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d in

the

room

that

is d

esig

nate

d as

the

com

man

d ce

nter

.

□ W

indo

w c

over

ings

such

as m

ini b

linds

or r

olle

r sha

des m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed fo

r all

win

dow

s and

do

ors t

o th

e co

mm

and

cent

er.

□ In

seco

ndar

y sc

hool

s, th

e se

curit

y ca

mer

a m

onito

rs sh

ould

be

loca

ted

in th

is a

rea.

□ Th

e sp

ace

desi

gnat

ed a

s the

Com

man

d C

ente

r mus

t be

larg

e en

ough

to a

ccom

mod

ate

up to

six

staf

f per

sons

.

□ St

orag

e sp

ace

is n

eede

d fo

r the

Cod

e R

ed/C

ode

Blu

e em

erge

ncy

kit.

Page 84: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

dmin

istr

atio

n S

uite

Pri

ncip

al’s

Off

ice

□ Th

is o

ffic

e sh

ould

be

carp

eted

.

□ Th

is o

ffic

e sh

ould

be

equi

pped

with

a ta

ck b

oard

and

two-

shel

f adj

usta

ble

book

case

s und

er th

e w

indo

ws.

Eac

h sh

elf m

ust b

e ab

le to

hol

d a

12 in

ch n

oteb

ook

uprig

ht.

□ Th

e of

fice

shou

ld b

e di

rect

ly a

cces

sibl

e to

the

conf

eren

ce ro

om th

roug

h a

conn

ectin

g do

or.

□ Th

is o

ffic

e sh

ould

hav

e go

od v

isib

le a

cces

s of t

he m

ain

entra

nce

and

to th

e bu

s dro

p-of

f are

a.

Ass

ista

nt P

rinc

ipal

’s O

ffic

e

□ Th

is o

ffic

e sh

ould

be

carp

eted

.

□ Th

is o

ffic

e sh

ould

be

equi

pped

with

a ta

ck b

oard

and

two-

shel

f adj

usta

ble

book

case

s und

er th

e w

indo

ws.

Eac

h sh

elf m

ust b

e ab

le to

hol

d a

12 in

ch n

oteb

ook

uprig

ht

□ Th

is o

ffic

e sh

ould

hav

e go

od v

isib

le a

cces

s to

the

mai

n en

tranc

e an

d bu

s dro

p-of

f.

Con

fere

nce

Roo

m

□ Th

e co

nfer

ence

room

shou

ld b

e ca

rpet

ed.

□ Th

e co

nfer

ence

room

is to

hav

e a

whi

tebo

ard,

a ta

ck b

oard

, and

one

boo

kcas

e.

□ Th

e co

nfer

ence

room

shou

ld b

e eq

uipp

ed w

ith a

tele

phon

e ja

ck.

□ C

asew

ork

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed o

n on

e w

all w

ith tw

o, tw

o-dr

awer

file

cab

inet

s for

con

fiden

tial

reco

rds,

lette

rs fo

rms,

etc.

C

ouns

elor

’s O

ffic

e

□ Th

is o

ffic

e sh

ould

be

carp

eted

.

□ Th

e co

unse

lor’

s off

ice

shou

ld b

e ea

sily

acc

essi

ble

from

the

clas

sroo

ms a

nd n

ear,

but n

ot a

par

t of

, the

adm

inis

tratio

n su

ite a

nd sh

ould

hav

e a

win

dow

.

□ Th

is o

ffic

e ne

eds a

whi

tebo

ard,

tack

boar

d, te

leph

one,

and

boo

kshe

lves

.

Page 85: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

dmin

istr

atio

n S

uite

Tele

phon

e B

ooth

□ A

sm

all r

oom

whe

re a

teac

her c

an ta

lk p

rivat

ely

on th

e te

leph

one

is re

quire

d. (T

he ro

om n

eeds

a

door

with

a w

indo

w, o

r a "

phon

e in

use

" lig

ht.)

□ Th

is ro

om sh

ould

hav

e a

smal

l bui

lt in

cou

nter

top

and

room

for o

ne c

hair.

□ Th

is ro

om sh

ould

be

carp

eted

. S

tora

ge a

nd R

ecor

ds R

oom

s

□ Tw

o lo

ckab

le ro

oms a

re n

eede

d fo

r sto

rage

of o

ffic

e su

pplie

s and

stud

ent r

ecor

ds.

□ Th

e re

cord

s roo

m n

eeds

spac

e fo

r loc

kabl

e fil

e ca

bine

ts.

2nd

Flo

or W

orkr

oom

□ Th

is ro

om re

quire

s app

ropr

iate

ele

ctric

al w

iring

and

ven

tilat

ion

to h

ouse

a c

opie

r for

staf

f use

.

□ Th

is ro

om re

quire

s a w

ork

coun

ter a

nd c

abin

ets u

nder

and

ove

r the

cou

nter

for s

torin

g su

pplie

s.

Page 86: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

taff

Dev

elop

men

t A

rea

Sta

ff D

evel

opm

ent

Are

a

Spa

tial N

eeds

St

aff D

evel

opm

ent O

ffic

e R

eadi

ng S

peci

alis

t Off

ice

Trai

ning

/Con

fere

nce

Roo

m

Sta

ff D

evel

opm

ent

Off

ice

□ Th

e st

aff d

evel

opm

ent a

rea

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d ne

ar th

e cl

assr

oom

s.

□ Th

e of

fice

shou

ld in

clud

e on

e w

orks

tatio

n.

□ Th

is o

ffic

e ne

eds a

whi

tebo

ard,

tack

boa

rd, c

lose

t, an

d vi

deo,

voi

ce, a

nd d

ata

outle

ts.

Rea

ding

Spe

cial

ist

Off

ice

□ Th

e st

aff d

evel

opm

ent a

rea

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d ne

ar th

e cl

assr

oom

s.

□ Th

e of

fice

shou

ld in

clud

e on

e w

orks

tatio

n.

□ Th

is o

ffic

e ne

eds a

whi

tebo

ard,

tack

boa

rd, c

lose

t, an

d vi

deo,

voi

ce, a

nd d

ata

outle

ts.

Trai

ning

/Con

fere

nce

Roo

m

□ Th

is ro

om w

ill b

e us

ed fo

r sta

ff tr

aini

ng n

eeds

.

□ T

his r

oom

shou

ld in

clud

e am

ple

shel

ving

for t

rain

ing

mat

eria

ls.

□ Th

e ro

om sh

ould

be

able

to c

omfo

rtabl

y ac

com

mod

ate

up to

12

parti

cipa

nts s

eate

d ar

ound

a

conf

eren

ce ta

ble.

□ A

whi

tebo

ard

and

tack

boa

rd sh

ould

be

inst

alle

d.

□ Th

e w

iring

for a

n ov

erhe

ad L

CD

pro

ject

or sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

Page 87: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

H

ealth

Ser

vice

s S

uite

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

Suite

Spa

tial N

eeds

W

aitin

g A

rea

Trea

tmen

t/Med

icat

ion

Are

a O

ffic

e/H

ealth

Ass

essm

ent R

oom

H

ealth

Ass

essm

ent/I

sola

tion

Roo

m

Res

t Are

a To

ilet R

oom

St

orag

e R

oom

□ Th

e H

ealth

Ser

vice

s Sui

te sh

ould

be

in c

ompl

ete

com

plia

nce

with

CO

MA

R 1

3A.0

5.05

.10A

.

□ Th

e he

alth

suite

mus

t mee

t acc

essi

bilit

y re

quire

men

ts o

f the

AD

A, a

nd a

t a m

inim

um, i

nclu

de

spac

es fo

r wai

ting,

exa

min

atio

n an

d tre

atm

ent,

stor

age,

rest

ing,

a se

para

te ro

om fo

r priv

ate

cons

ulta

tion

and

for u

se a

s the

scho

ol h

ealth

serv

ices

pro

fess

iona

l’s o

ffic

e, a

toile

t roo

m, a

nd

lock

able

cab

inet

s for

stor

ing

heal

th re

cord

s and

med

icat

ions

.

□ A

des

igna

ted

scho

ol h

ealth

serv

ices

pro

fess

iona

l mus

t be

invo

lved

in th

e pl

anni

ng o

f the

hea

lth

serv

ices

suite

.

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

refe

r to

MSD

E do

cum

ent,

Scho

ol H

ealth

Ser

vice

s, Ju

ne 2

002

for s

peci

fic

utili

ty in

form

atio

n.

□ Th

e su

ite sh

ould

be

desi

gned

to p

rovi

de e

asy

visu

al su

perv

isio

n of

all

the

spac

es b

y th

e he

alth

se

rvic

es p

rofe

ssio

nal.

The

suite

shou

ld b

e la

id o

ut so

that

an

addi

tiona

l wor

ksta

tion

for a

hea

lth

prof

essi

onal

can

be

posi

tione

d ne

ar th

e tre

atm

ent a

nd w

aitin

g ar

eas.

□ In

add

ition

to a

cces

s to

the

gene

ral o

ffic

e, th

e he

alth

serv

ices

suite

als

o m

ust h

ave

a w

indo

w in

to

the

gene

ral o

ffic

e so

that

off

ice

staf

f may

mon

itor t

he ro

om w

hen

heat

h st

aff i

s una

vaila

ble.

□ Th

e he

alth

room

als

o m

ust h

ave

a do

or to

the

corr

idor

.

□ V

entil

atio

n is

impo

rtant

thro

ugho

ut th

e he

alth

suite

. .

□ Th

e co

unte

rtops

shou

ld b

e se

amle

ss to

aid

in m

aint

aini

ng sa

nita

ry c

ondi

tions

.

□ Th

e flo

or fi

nish

shou

ld b

e an

eas

ily c

lean

ed n

on-a

bsor

bent

mat

eria

l. C

arpe

t sho

uld

not b

e us

ed

in a

ny a

reas

of t

he h

ealth

suite

.

□ A

non

-por

ous c

eilin

g m

ater

ial s

houl

d be

use

d. V

inyl

-coa

ted

ceili

ng ti

le o

r pai

nted

dry

wal

l is a

n ac

cept

able

cho

ice.

□ If

any

of t

he a

reas

are

enc

lose

d th

en g

laze

d w

alls

are

as sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

Page 88: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

H

ealth

Ser

vice

s S

uite

□ Th

e he

alth

suite

requ

ires w

all a

nd b

ase

cabi

nets

, loc

kabl

e fil

e ca

bine

ts, f

or st

orin

g he

alth

reco

rds.

A p

ortio

n of

thes

e ca

bine

ts m

ust b

e lo

ckab

le to

stor

e m

edic

atio

ns, m

edic

al su

pplie

s, an

d eq

uipm

ent.

W

aitin

g A

rea

□ Th

e w

aitin

g ar

ea sh

ould

hav

e sp

ace

for f

our t

o ei

ght c

hairs

.

□ A

smal

l tac

k bo

ard

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed in

the

wai

ting

area

to d

ispl

ay h

ealth

car

e an

d ot

her

info

rmat

ion

of im

porta

nce

to st

uden

ts a

nd st

aff.

Trea

tmen

t/M

edic

atio

n A

rea

□ Th

is a

rea

shou

ld b

e ad

jace

nt to

the

wai

ting

area

to fa

cilit

ate

the

effic

ient

flow

of s

tude

nts.

□ Th

is a

rea

shou

ld h

ave

a ki

tche

n ty

pe si

nk w

ith c

abin

ets a

bove

and

bel

ow (i

nclu

ding

a lo

cked

m

edic

ine

cabi

net),

a 3

4-in

ch h

igh

coun

terto

p, a

nd a

smal

l res

iden

tial s

tyle

refr

iger

ator

/free

zer t

o st

ore

med

ical

supp

lies a

nd fo

ods.

□ A

min

imum

of 1

2 lin

ear f

eet o

f wal

l and

bas

e ca

bine

ts sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

□ Th

e fr

eeze

r sho

uld

have

an

icem

aker

.

□ Th

e tre

atm

ent a

rea

also

requ

ires a

com

pute

r. O

ffic

e/H

ealth

Ass

essm

ent

Roo

m

□ Th

e ro

om re

quire

s one

com

pute

r, fa

x m

achi

ne, a

nd e

lect

roni

c co

nnec

tion

and

phys

ical

pro

xim

ity

to a

cop

y m

achi

ne.

□ Th

e sp

aces

use

d fo

r con

sulta

tion

and

exam

inat

ions

mus

t be

encl

osed

with

suff

icie

nt a

cous

tical

is

olat

ion

to e

nsur

e co

mpl

ete

priv

acy

and

conf

iden

tialit

y.

□ A

smal

l sin

k, w

ith c

up, t

owel

, and

soap

dis

pens

ers s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d.

Hea

lth A

sses

smen

t/Is

olat

ion

Roo

m

□ Th

e sp

aces

use

d fo

r con

sulta

tion

and

exam

inat

ions

mus

t be

encl

osed

with

suff

icie

nt a

cous

tical

is

olat

ion

to e

nsur

e co

mpl

ete

priv

acy

and

conf

iden

tialit

y.

□ A

smal

l sin

k, w

ith c

up, t

owel

, and

soap

dis

pens

ers s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d.

Page 89: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

H

ealth

Ser

vice

s S

uite

Res

t A

rea

□ Th

is a

rea

shou

ld n

ot b

e a

fully

con

tain

ed ro

om b

ut ra

ther

an

area

that

can

pro

vide

priv

acy

for

each

cot

with

a d

raw

cur

tain

on

a ce

iling

trac

k.

□ Th

e re

st a

rea

need

s spa

ce fo

r tw

o to

four

cot

s, an

d on

e be

dsid

e ca

bine

t.

□ Th

ere

shou

ld b

e a

sepa

rate

priv

acy

room

with

in th

e re

st a

rea,

with

a d

oor a

nd sp

ace

for a

cot

and

a

sing

le p

edes

tal d

esk

and

chai

r.

□ In

the

rest

are

a an

d pr

ivac

y ro

om, s

uppl

emen

tary

pow

er v

entil

atio

n ca

pabl

e of

20

chan

ges p

er

hour

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed, w

ith c

ontro

l by

mea

ns o

f a se

para

te sw

itch

with

in th

e he

alth

suite

.

Toile

t R

oom

□ O

ne A

DA

toile

t sho

uld

be p

rovi

ded.

□ Th

e to

ilet r

oom

shou

ld b

e ac

cess

ed w

ithou

t hav

ing

to g

o th

roug

h an

othe

r fun

ctio

nal s

pace

in th

e he

alth

suite

such

as a

rest

are

a.

□ Id

eally

, stu

dent

s sho

uld

be a

ble

to e

nter

the

heal

th su

ite so

lely

to u

se th

e to

ilet r

oom

with

out

disr

uptin

g ot

her a

ctiv

ities

. St

orag

e R

oom

□ Th

e st

orag

e ar

ea is

to h

ave

spac

e su

ffici

ent f

or a

four

dra

wer

lock

ed fi

le c

abin

et, a

war

drob

e fo

r co

ats,

and

spac

e fo

r sto

ring

larg

e ite

ms s

uch

as w

heel

chai

rs.

Page 90: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

taff

Lou

nge

Staf

f Lou

nge

□ Th

e st

aff l

oung

e is

a p

lace

for s

taff

mem

bers

to re

lax,

stud

y, p

lan,

and

thin

k to

geth

er.

□ Tw

o to

ilet r

oom

s are

requ

ired

just

out

side

of t

he st

aff l

oung

e. T

he to

ilet r

oom

s may

be

labe

led

"adu

lt" ra

ther

than

"m

ale"

and

"fe

mal

e" in

an

elem

enta

ry sc

hool

.

□ Th

e st

aff l

oung

e sh

ould

con

tain

a c

ompa

ct b

uilt-

in k

itche

n w

ith si

x lin

ear f

eet o

f cou

nter

spac

e fo

r a m

icro

wav

e an

d si

nk a

nd a

spac

e fo

r a re

frig

erat

or (N

IC).

□ A

clo

ck sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

□ A

smal

l, en

clos

ed ro

om w

ith c

ount

erto

p an

d sp

ace

for o

ne c

hair

is n

eede

d fo

r a te

leph

one.

□ V

entil

atio

n m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed.

An

oper

able

win

dow

in th

e st

aff r

oom

is p

refe

rred

.

□ A

n ar

ea sh

ould

be

desi

gnat

ed fo

r a c

ompu

ter w

ith ja

cks f

or c

ompu

ter &

tele

phon

e (m

odem

).

Page 91: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ce F

acili

ties

Spa

tial n

eeds

Bu

ildin

g Se

rvic

e O

ffice

Lo

cker

/Sho

wer

are

a Co

mpa

ctor

/Tra

sh R

oom

Re

cycl

ing

Room

G

ener

al S

tora

ge &

Rec

eivi

ng A

rea

Gen

eral

Sto

rage

Bu

ildin

g Se

rvic

e O

utdo

or S

tora

ge

Build

ing

Serv

ice

Clos

ets

B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

Off

ice

□ Th

e en

tire

build

ing

serv

ices

are

a sh

ould

be

loca

ted

adja

cent

to th

e ge

nera

l rec

eivi

ng a

rea.

□ Th

e of

fice

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ed a

s a g

ener

al o

ffic

e th

at c

an a

ccom

mod

ate

two

staf

f mem

bers

with

tw

o de

sks a

nd a

ppro

pria

te w

iring

for c

ompu

ters

, pho

nes,

etc.

Lo

cker

/Sho

wer

Are

a

□ A

lock

er a

rea

mus

t be

loca

ted

near

the

rece

ivin

g ar

ea.

□ Si

x fu

ll-siz

e lo

cker

s sho

uld

be p

rovi

ded

in th

e lo

cker

are

a.

□ Th

e lo

cker

are

a sh

ould

be

desig

ned

with

an

encl

osed

toile

t roo

m a

nd sh

ower

room

for b

uild

ing

serv

ice

staff

use.

□ A

n EN

ERG

Y S

TAR

stack

able

was

her a

nd d

ryer

is re

quire

d in

this

area

. C

ompa

ctor

/Can

Was

h/Tr

ash

Roo

m

□ Th

is ro

om n

eeds

to b

e co

mpl

etel

y se

para

te fr

om th

e ki

tche

n sp

aces

with

no

com

mon

wal

ls.

□ T

rash

truc

ks m

ust h

ave

acce

ss to

this

room

.

□ Th

e ro

om sh

ould

be

heat

ed a

nd h

ave

adeq

uate

inte

rior l

ight

ing,

floo

r dra

inag

e, a

nd e

asily

cl

eana

ble

surf

aces

.

□ H

ot a

nd c

old

wat

er sh

ould

be

avai

labl

e fo

r flu

shin

g an

d cl

eani

ng.

□ Th

e ro

om sh

ould

be

desi

gned

to b

e pe

st fr

ee a

nd w

ell v

entil

ated

.

□ Fl

oors

shou

ld b

e sl

oped

so th

at w

ash

dow

n st

ays w

ithin

the

room

and

goe

s dow

n th

e dr

ain.

Page 92: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s

□ Th

e co

mpa

ctor

s nee

d to

be

inst

alle

d w

ith e

noug

h cl

eara

nce

away

from

the

wal

l to

perm

it st

aff t

o ac

cess

the

equi

pmen

t fro

m a

ll si

des.

□ A

roll-

up d

oor f

or tr

ash

trans

fer t

o tru

cks,

stea

m c

lean

ing

equi

pmen

t, an

d tra

sh c

olle

ctio

n co

ntai

ners

are

nee

ded.

□ Th

e ro

om sh

ould

be

desi

gned

with

a ra

mp

to a

llow

tras

hcan

s to

be ro

lled

to th

e do

ck.

Rec

yclin

g R

oom

□ Th

e re

cycl

ing

room

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d ne

xt to

the

trash

room

. Th

is ro

om w

ill b

e us

ed fo

r the

so

rting

of r

ecyc

led

item

s.

□ Sp

ace

for a

recy

clin

g du

mps

ter f

or c

ardb

oard

is n

eede

d ou

tsid

e of

the

recy

clin

g ro

om

(app

roxi

mat

ely

8’x8

’).

□ Th

is ro

om n

eeds

to b

e co

mpl

etel

y se

para

te fr

om th

e ki

tche

n sp

aces

with

no

com

mon

wal

ls.

□ T

rash

truc

ks m

ust h

ave

acce

ss to

this

room

.

□ Th

e ro

om sh

ould

be

heat

ed a

nd h

ave

adeq

uate

inte

rior l

ight

ing,

floo

r dra

inag

e, a

nd e

asily

cl

eana

ble

surf

aces

.

□ H

ot a

nd c

old

wat

er sh

ould

be

avai

labl

e fo

r flu

shin

g an

d cl

eani

ng.

□ Th

e ro

om sh

ould

be

desi

gned

to b

e pe

st fr

ee a

nd w

ell v

entil

ated

.

□ Fl

oors

shou

ld b

e sl

oped

so th

at w

ash

dow

n st

ays w

ithin

the

room

and

goe

s dow

n th

e dr

ain.

□ A

roll-

up d

oor f

or tr

ash

trans

fer t

o tru

cks,

stea

m c

lean

ing

equi

pmen

t, an

d tra

sh c

olle

ctio

n co

ntai

ners

are

nee

ded.

□ R

amp

shou

ld a

llow

tras

hcan

s to

be ro

lled

to th

e do

ck.

Gen

eral

Sto

rage

and

Rec

eivi

ng A

rea

□ Th

e re

ceiv

ing

area

shou

ld b

e en

clos

ed, f

loor

to c

eilin

g, w

ith a

cha

in li

nk fe

nce.

□ Fl

exib

le sh

elvi

ng is

requ

ired

but s

houl

d no

t occ

upy

mor

e th

an o

ne th

ird o

f the

are

a.

□ Th

is a

rea

mus

t be

secu

red.

□ G

ood

light

ing

and

easy

acc

ess t

o m

ater

ials

bei

ng st

ored

are

requ

ired.

□ El

ectri

cal o

utle

ts, u

pgra

ded

light

ing

and

vent

ilatio

n m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed in

this

are

a.

Page 93: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s

Gen

eral

Sto

rage

□ Fl

exib

le sh

elvi

ng to

acc

omm

odat

e bo

oks,

teac

hing

aid

s, la

rge

size

(24"

x 3

6") p

aper

, and

oth

er

inst

ruct

iona

l sup

plie

s is r

equi

red.

□ G

ood

light

ing

and

easy

acc

ess t

o m

ater

ials

bei

ng st

ored

are

requ

ired.

□ El

ectri

cal o

utle

ts, u

pgra

ded

light

ing

and

vent

ilatio

n m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed in

all

larg

e st

orag

e ro

oms

for f

utur

e fle

xibi

lity.

B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

Out

door

Sto

rage

Roo

m

□ O

utdo

or st

orag

e is

to b

e ne

ar th

e se

rvic

e ar

ea a

nd is

to b

e su

itabl

e fo

r hea

vy m

owin

g, sn

ow

rem

oval

, and

oth

er o

utdo

or e

quip

men

t.

□ Th

e di

men

sion

s of t

he o

utdo

or st

orag

e ar

ea m

ust b

e ab

le to

acc

omm

odat

e tw

o tra

ctor

s sid

e by

si

de. (

one

tract

or is

app

roxi

mat

ely

9’ lo

ng b

y 7.

5’ w

ide

and

a se

cond

smal

ler t

ract

or) a

nd o

ther

eq

uipm

ent.

□ A

rolli

ng g

arag

e st

yle

door

and

a re

gula

r doo

r mus

t be

prov

ided

.

□ A

ram

ped

and

pave

d dr

ivew

ay is

requ

ired

for t

he tr

acto

r so

that

it c

an a

cces

s the

side

wal

k an

d dr

ivew

ays o

f the

scho

ol d

urin

g sn

ow re

mov

al.

□ El

ectri

cal s

ervi

ce a

nd li

ghtin

g in

side

mus

t be

prov

ided

. A

cces

s to

the

light

switc

hes m

ust b

e av

aila

ble

at b

oth

entra

nces

.

□ Pr

oper

ven

tilat

ion

for s

tora

ge o

f gas

olin

e is

requ

ired.

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ce C

lose

ts

□ A

t a m

inim

um, t

here

shou

ld b

e a

build

ing

serv

ice

clos

et fo

r eac

h 19

,000

gro

ss sq

uare

of t

he

faci

lity.

In

addi

tion,

ther

e sh

ould

be

a bu

ildin

g se

rvic

e cl

oset

on

each

floo

r and

eac

h w

ing

of th

e fa

cilit

y.

□ Th

e cl

oset

s sho

uld

be a

min

imum

of 2

5 sq

. ft.

□ Th

e bu

ildin

g se

rvic

e cl

oset

mus

t acc

omm

odat

e a

min

imum

of o

ne u

tility

car

t.

□ Th

e cl

oset

requ

ires s

helv

ing

for c

lean

ing

supp

lies a

nd a

mop

/bro

om h

olde

r is r

equi

red.

□ Th

e cl

oset

requ

ires a

floo

r mop

sink

with

hot

and

col

d ru

nnin

g w

ater

and

a fl

oor d

rain

.

□ W

here

feas

ible

, clo

set d

oors

shou

ld sw

ing

outw

ard

in o

rder

to m

axim

ize

the

stor

age

area

and

pr

ovid

e ea

sier

acc

ess t

o ite

ms w

ithin

the

clos

ets.

Page 94: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

ite R

equi

rem

ents

Site

Req

uire

men

ts

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

con

side

r the

arc

hite

ctur

e of

the

neig

hbor

hood

in d

esig

ning

the

build

ing

□ Th

e si

te sh

ould

be

desi

gned

to p

rovi

de a

cle

ar v

iew

of a

ll pl

ay a

reas

and

to fa

cilit

ate

supe

rvis

ion

from

one

loca

tion.

□ Pr

otec

tive

fenc

ing

may

nee

d to

be

prov

ided

nea

r hea

vily

woo

ded

area

s, bu

sy st

reet

s, st

eep

hills

, pa

rkin

g lo

ts a

nd tu

rnar

ound

are

as.

□ M

etal

dra

ins/

grat

es sh

ould

not

be

loca

ted

in th

e pl

ayin

g fie

lds,

pave

d pl

ay a

reas

and

mul

ched

pl

aygr

ound

equ

ipm

ent a

reas

.

□ Pa

ved

area

s and

fiel

ds m

ust b

e as

leve

l as p

ossi

ble.

Wat

er sh

ould

not

col

lect

on

pave

d ar

eas o

r in

mul

ched

are

as. T

he a

rchi

tect

shou

ld c

onsi

der t

he a

rchi

tect

ure

of th

e ne

ighb

orho

od in

des

igni

ng

the

build

ing.

□ Th

e de

sign

shou

ld re

tain

as m

any

trees

as p

ossi

ble

in o

rder

to b

uffe

r the

scho

ol a

nd th

e pl

ayin

g fie

lds.

□ Pe

dest

rian

acce

ss m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed fr

om th

e su

rrou

ndin

g ne

ighb

orho

ods.

□ A

n un

impr

oved

are

a on

-site

shou

ld b

e de

sign

ated

to se

rve

as a

n en

viro

nmen

tal s

tudy

are

a in

the

futu

re.

□ A

cov

ered

are

a fo

r stu

dent

s in

the

bus l

oadi

ng a

rea

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed.

□ Sp

ace

for b

uses

to lo

ad a

t one

tim

e is

need

ed.

The

num

ber o

f bus

es w

ill b

e re

view

ed d

urin

g th

e de

sign

phas

e in

con

sulta

tion

with

the

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n.

□ B

ike

rack

s sho

uld

be p

rovi

ded

near

the

build

ing.

□ Pl

aygr

ound

equ

ipm

ent a

reas

shou

ld n

ot b

e lo

cate

d at

the

botto

m o

f hill

s unl

ess a

pro

visi

on is

m

ade

to c

hann

el w

ater

aw

ay fr

om th

e eq

uipm

ent a

reas

. D

rive

way

and

Ser

vice

Dri

ve

□ Th

e ar

chite

ct/e

ngin

eer s

houl

d re

fer t

o th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

ns w

hen

desi

gnin

g th

e dr

ivew

ay, b

us lo

op, s

ervi

ce d

rives

, etc

.

□ B

us tr

affic

shou

ld b

e se

para

ted

from

car

traf

fic a

t all

times

, whe

n po

ssib

le.

Bus

load

ing

zone

s sh

ould

be

able

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

entir

e st

uden

t bod

y.

□ A

stud

ent d

rop

off a

rea

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed a

nd m

ust b

e se

para

te fr

om th

e bu

s loo

p ar

ea.

□ A

ll dr

ivew

ays m

ust b

e ar

rang

ed so

that

chi

ldre

n do

not

cro

ss th

em to

get

to th

e pl

ay a

reas

.

Page 95: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

ite R

equi

rem

ents

□ C

are

for s

afet

y of

stud

ents

mus

t be

exer

cise

d in

dev

elop

ing

the

driv

eway

s inc

ludi

ng u

se o

f saf

ety

rails

in th

e bu

s loa

ding

are

a.

□ Pe

dest

rian

acce

ss to

the

scho

ol fa

cilit

ies s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

mak

e th

e be

st u

se o

f com

mun

ity

right

-of-

way

s and

avo

id c

ross

ing

of lo

adin

g zo

ne a

reas

.

□ Th

e si

te m

ust c

ompl

y w

ith th

e m

ost c

urre

nt A

DA

or C

OM

AR

regu

latio

ns, w

hich

ever

is m

ost

strin

gent

.

□ Si

te a

cces

s mus

t be

prov

ided

to c

ompl

y w

ith fi

re p

rote

ctio

n an

d st

orm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t.

□ D

rivew

ay a

pron

s are

to b

e pe

rpen

dicu

lar t

o th

e ce

nter

line

of th

e st

reet

; and

if th

ere

is a

n in

ters

ectin

g st

reet

on

the

oppo

site

side

from

the

prop

osed

driv

eway

s, th

e dr

ivew

ay a

pron

shou

ld

line

up w

ith th

e in

ters

ectin

g st

reet

.

□ D

rivew

ays s

houl

d be

loca

ted

so th

at v

ehic

le h

eadl

ight

s do

not p

roje

ct in

to a

djac

ent h

omes

.

□ A

serv

ice

driv

e is

requ

ired

to se

rvic

e th

e ki

tche

n, b

oile

r roo

m, a

nd g

ener

al d

eliv

ery

area

. Th

e ar

chite

ct sh

ould

refe

r to

the

MC

PS F

acili

ties G

uide

.

□ Si

te a

cces

s mus

t be

prov

ided

to c

ompl

y w

ith fi

re p

rote

ctio

n an

d st

orm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t re

gula

tions

. P

arki

ng

□ Id

eally

, a m

inim

um o

f 80

park

ing

spac

es sh

ould

be

desi

gned

initi

ally

for a

scho

ol w

ith re

gula

r st

affin

g al

loca

tions

, with

futu

re e

xpan

sion

pos

sibl

e. A

t sch

ools

with

cla

ss-s

ize

redu

ctio

n, 1

00

park

ing

spac

es sh

ould

be

prov

ided

.

□ Th

e pa

rkin

g ar

ea sh

ould

be

desig

ned

to m

axim

ize

safe

ty a

nd m

inim

ize

spee

d.

□ A

dequ

ate

light

ing

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed.

□ Pa

rkin

g ar

ea sh

ould

hav

e tw

o ex

its.

□ G

uard

rails

or b

olla

rds a

re to

be

insta

lled

to p

rote

ct fi

elds

and

pla

y ar

eas.

La

ndsc

apin

g

□ Pl

antin

g sh

ould

incl

ude

scre

en p

lant

ing

and

othe

r pla

ntin

g ne

eded

for e

rosi

on c

ontro

l.

□ Ex

istin

g pl

ant s

tock

, if o

n si

te, i

s to

be e

valu

ated

for r

euse

and

pro

tect

ed a

ccor

ding

ly.

□ La

ndsc

apin

g to

supp

ort e

nerg

y co

nser

vatio

n an

d to

rela

te th

e bu

ildin

g to

the

site

with

aes

thet

ic

appe

al m

ust b

e in

clud

ed.

Page 96: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

S

ite R

equi

rem

ents

□ C

onsi

dera

tion

shou

ld b

e gi

ven

to sa

fety

and

secu

rity

whe

n se

lect

ing

plan

t mat

eria

ls.

□ P

rovi

sion

for o

utdo

or w

ater

ing

mus

t be

incl

uded

.

□ Th

e la

ndsc

apin

g pl

an sh

ould

incl

ude

area

s for

out

door

s env

ironm

enta

l edu

catio

n pr

ogra

ms.

Page 97: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

Site

Req

uire

men

ts

Phy

sica

l Edu

catio

n Si

te R

equi

rem

ents

Th

e ite

ms d

escr

ibed

bel

ow a

re fo

r a sc

hool

that

mee

ts th

e pr

efer

red

site

size

of 1

2 us

able

acr

es.

At s

choo

ls w

ith sm

alle

r site

s, th

e ar

chite

ct is

to w

ork

with

MC

PS st

aff,

incl

udin

g th

e Ph

ysic

al

Educ

atio

n C

urric

ulum

Coo

rdin

ator

, Saf

ety

Dire

ctor

, and

scho

ol st

aff t

o de

term

ine

layo

ut o

f the

pl

ay a

reas

. Th

e ou

tdoo

r phy

sica

l edu

catio

nal i

nstru

ctio

nal s

pace

shou

ld n

ot b

e co

mpr

omis

ed fo

r pl

aygr

ound

equ

ipm

ent.

Soft

ball

Fiel

ds

□ Tw

o so

ftbal

l fie

lds s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d w

ith th

e fo

llow

ing

desi

gn re

quire

men

ts:

□ 25

0' ra

dius

, with

a so

ccer

fiel

d su

perim

pose

d sh

ould

be

prov

ided

if p

ossi

ble.

See

bel

ow fo

r the

so

ccer

fiel

d di

men

sion

s.

□ Th

e si

te si

ze w

ill d

eter

min

e th

e nu

mbe

r and

dim

ensi

on o

f the

softb

all f

ield

s.

□ So

ftbal

l fie

lds s

houl

d ha

ve m

etal

ben

ches

pro

tect

ed b

y fe

ncin

g fo

r eac

h te

am's

use.

□ Th

e fe

ncin

g an

d be

nche

s sho

uld

not i

nter

fere

with

socc

er fi

eld

usag

e.

□ Th

e so

ftbal

l bac

ksto

ps (2

) sha

ll be

in d

iago

nal c

orne

rs o

f the

fiel

d or

in c

orne

rs o

n th

e sa

me

side

. Se

e th

e di

agra

m in

the

MC

PS F

acili

ties G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tions

.

□ So

ftbal

l inf

ield

s are

not

skin

ned

for e

lem

enta

ry sc

hool

s. H

owev

er, o

ne fi

eld

may

be

skin

ned

if it

does

not

sign

ifica

ntly

impa

ct th

e so

ccer

pla

ying

are

a.

Soc

cer

□ Th

e si

te si

ze w

ill d

eter

min

e th

e si

ze o

f the

socc

er fi

elds

. Th

e el

emen

tary

scho

ol si

ze so

ccer

fiel

d is

150

'x24

0' h

owev

er th

e m

inim

um si

ze fi

eld

shou

ld b

e 10

5' x

180

'.

□ N

o pe

rman

ent g

oals

or t

empo

rary

goa

ls sh

ould

be

inst

alle

d on

the

socc

er fi

elds

. P

aved

Pla

y A

reas

□ Tw

o pa

ved

area

s, 80

' x 1

00' s

houl

d be

pro

vide

d if

the

site

per

mits

.

□ If

loca

ted

adja

cent

to o

ne a

noth

er, a

gra

ssy

strip

of a

t lea

st 2

0' sh

ould

be

betw

een

the

two

pave

d ar

eas.

□ O

ne a

rea

shou

ld h

ave

four

bas

ketb

all g

oals

with

app

ropr

iate

strip

ing

(see

dia

gram

in th

e M

CPS

Fa

cilit

y G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tion)

.

Page 98: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

Site

Req

uire

men

ts

□ A

seco

nd a

rea,

des

igna

ted

for p

rimar

y us

e, sh

all b

e st

riped

acc

ordi

ng to

dra

win

gs p

rovi

ded

in th

e M

CPS

Fac

ility

Gui

delin

e Sp

ecifi

catio

n. O

n sm

all s

ites,

this

pav

e ar

ea sh

ould

be

fenc

ed fo

r use

by

Gra

de K

inde

rgar

ten

stud

ents

.

Page 99: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

Site

Req

uire

men

ts

Kin

derg

arte

n P

aved

Pla

y A

rea

□ A

third

pav

ed a

rea,

at l

east

40’

x 60

’ but

pre

fera

bly

80' x

100

', is

des

ired,

is n

eede

d fo

r the

K

inde

rgar

ten

stud

ents

.

□ Th

is a

rea

need

s to

be lo

cate

d ad

jace

nt to

the

Kin

derg

arte

n pl

aygr

ound

(mul

ched

) are

a an

d cl

ose

to th

e ot

her p

aved

pla

y ar

eas.

□ Th

is a

rea

requ

ires a

fenc

e ar

ound

it o

r ade

quat

e se

para

tion

from

the

othe

r pav

ed p

lay

area

s.

□ Th

e ar

ea w

ill b

e st

riped

acc

ordi

ng to

dra

win

gs p

rovi

ded

in th

e Fa

cilit

y G

uide

line

Spec

ifica

tion.

P

layg

roun

d Eq

uipm

ent

Are

as (m

ulch

ed a

reas

)

□ O

ne o

r tw

o ar

eas s

hall

be p

rovi

ded

near

the

play

ing

field

s and

larg

e pa

ved

play

are

a fo

r pl

aygr

ound

equ

ipm

ent.

Each

are

a sh

ould

be

appr

oxim

atel

y 40

’x40

’. T

he si

ze a

nd sh

ape

of th

e pl

ay a

rea

will

be

deve

lope

d du

ring

the

desi

gn p

roce

ss in

con

sulta

tion

with

MC

PS st

aff.

□ Th

e ar

ea sh

all b

e le

vel,

bare

gro

und,

uns

eede

d, a

nd n

o so

d. M

CPS

will

pro

vide

equ

ipm

ent

dim

ensi

ons f

or th

ese

area

s.

□ A

n un

derg

roun

d dr

aina

ge sy

stem

mus

t be

prov

ided

.

□ Th

e lo

ose-

fill s

urfa

cing

mat

eria

l (en

gine

ered

woo

d fib

er) m

ust m

eet A

DA

requ

irem

ents

. A

bo

rder

mus

t be

prov

ided

to c

onta

in th

e fil

ler.

The

surf

acin

g m

ater

ials

mus

t mee

t or e

xcee

d sa

fety

spec

ifica

tions

for s

hock

abs

orbi

ng q

ualit

ies a

s out

lined

by

US

CPS

C.

K

inde

rgar

ten

Pla

y A

rea

(mul

ched

are

a)

□ A

mul

ched

kin

derg

arte

n pl

ay a

rea

of 4

0' x

60'

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d ad

jace

nt to

the

kind

erga

rten

pave

d pl

ay a

rea

desc

ribed

in th

e ph

ysic

al e

duca

tion

sect

ion

for p

layg

roun

d eq

uipm

ent.

The

size

an

d sh

ape

of th

e pl

ay a

rea

will

be

deve

lope

d du

ring

the

desi

gn p

roce

ss in

con

sulta

tion

with

M

CPS

staf

f.

□ Th

e ar

ea sh

all b

e le

vel b

are

grou

nd, u

nsee

ded,

and

no

sod.

MC

PS w

ill p

rovi

de e

quip

men

t di

men

sion

s for

this

are

a.

□ Pr

otec

tive

fenc

ing

shou

ld e

nclo

se th

e ar

ea.

□ A

n un

derg

roun

d dr

aina

ge sy

stem

mus

t be

prov

ided

.

□ Th

e lo

ose-

fill s

urfa

cing

mat

eria

l (en

gine

ered

woo

d fib

er) m

ust m

eet A

DA

requ

irem

ents

. A

bo

rder

mus

t be

prov

ided

to c

onta

in th

e fil

ler.

The

surf

acin

g m

ater

ials

mus

t mee

t or e

xcee

d sa

fety

spec

ifica

tions

for s

hock

abs

orbi

ng q

ualit

ies a

s out

lined

by

US

CPS

C.

Page 100: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

P

hysi

cal E

duca

tion

Site

Req

uire

men

ts

Pre

kind

erga

rten

Pla

y A

reas

□ If

the

scho

ol h

as a

pre

kind

erga

rten,

Hea

d St

art,

or P

resc

hool

Edu

catio

n Pr

ogra

m, t

hen

a se

para

te

and

fenc

ed o

utdo

or p

lay

is re

quire

d.

□ Th

is a

rea

mus

t be

adja

cent

to th

e cl

assr

oom

s with

acc

ess d

irect

ly fr

om th

e cl

assr

oom

s.

□ If

the

scho

ol d

oes n

ot h

ave

a pr

ekin

derg

arte

n pr

ogra

m th

an th

e ou

tdoo

r pla

y ar

ea sh

ould

be

mas

ter p

lann

ed so

that

it c

an b

e ad

ded

on a

t a la

ter t

ime.

□ Th

e pr

ekin

derg

arte

n pl

ay a

rea

shou

ld in

clud

e a

40’x

40’ p

aved

pla

y ar

ea a

nd a

40’

x40’

mul

ched

ar

ea. T

he a

rchi

tect

will

con

sult

with

the

MC

PS st

aff o

n th

e de

sign

of t

he p

layg

roun

d eq

uipm

ent.

Page 101: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902

A

dditi

onal

Pro

gram

Req

uire

men

ts

Add

ition

al P

rogr

am R

equi

rem

ents

□ If

ther

e is

maj

or si

te w

ork

on th

is p

roje

ct, t

he d

esig

n te

am sh

ould

revi

ew h

ow th

e ar

rival

and

dr

op o

ff o

f dis

able

d st

uden

ts a

re a

ccom

mod

ated

to m

eet c

urre

nt a

cces

sibi

lity

requ

irem

ents

.

Page 102: COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDYmontgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/... · 2015-05-08 · COLLOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1902