35
COURSE: BUS 478 D600 E200 (Tue.) INSTRUCTOR: Jerry Sheppard TITLE: Strategy Office: WMC 4387 SEMESTER: Spring 2016 (1161) Hours: Tue. 2:40-4:10 CLASSROOM: WMC 3220 & by Appointment WEBSITE: http://www.sfu.ca/ Phone: 778- 782-4918 ~sheppard/478index.html E-mail: [email protected] Pre-requisites: Bus 207, 312, 343, 360, and either Bus 374 or 381, and 90 credit hours. Objectives 1.Develop a capacity to think strategically about a firm, its business position, how it can gain a competitive advantage. 2.Conduct strategic analyses for a variety of industries, organizations and situations so as to develop a strong grasp of the competitive challenges of a global environment. 3. Become acquainted with the managerial tasks associated with strategy formulation, and the actions managers can take to pro- mote competent implementation. 4.Integrate knowledge from other courses to see how parts of the business puzzle fit together and why different parts of a firm need to be managed in harmony. Required Textbook Hitt, Ireland & Hoskisson, Strategic Management, Competiveness & Globalization, Concepts 11 th ed. Cengage. ISBN: 9781285425184 Grades Individual written case analysis . . . . . . . 28% Midterm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28% Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12% Individual contribution to group . . . . . . . 5% Group written case Synopsis . . . . . . . . . 5% Group written case analysis . . . . . . . . . . 10% Group presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12% Class participation Positive contribution to class discussion is an integral part of the course; coming to class is not enough! Revised: January 11, 2016

Comm 401: Strategy and Competition - SFU.ca - Simon ...sheppard/478/syl/First_Class.docx · Web viewConduct strategic analyses for a variety of industries, organizations and situations

  • Upload
    vukhanh

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

COURSE: BUS 478 D600 E200 (Tue.) INSTRUCTOR: Jerry SheppardTITLE: Strategy Office: WMC 4387SEMESTER: Spring 2016 (1161) Hours: Tue. 2:40-4:10 CLASSROOM: WMC 3220 & by Appointment WEBSITE: http://www.sfu.ca/ Phone: 778-782-4918

~sheppard/478index.html E-mail: [email protected]

Pre-requisites: Bus 207, 312, 343, 360, and either Bus 374 or 381, and 90 credit hours.

Objectives 1. Develop a capacity to think strategically

about a firm, its business position, how it can gain a competitive advantage.

2. Conduct strategic analyses for a variety of industries, organizations and situations so as to develop a strong grasp of the competitive challenges of a global environment.

3. Become acquainted with the managerial tasks associated with strategy formulation, and the actions managers can take to pro-mote competent implementation.

4. Integrate knowledge from other courses to see how parts of the business puzzle fit together and why different parts of a firm need to be managed in harmony.

Required TextbookHitt, Ireland & Hoskisson, Strategic Management, Competiveness & Globalization, Concepts 11th ed. Cengage. ISBN: 9781285425184

GradesIndividual written case analysis . . . . . . . 28%Midterm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28%Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12%Individual contribution to group . . . . . . . 5%Group written case Synopsis . . . . . . . . . 5%Group written case analysis . . . . . . . . . . 10%Group presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12%

Class participationPositive contribution to class discussion is an integral part of the course; coming to class is not enough! Attendance accounts for some of this and contribution to discussion accounts for a major part. The best way to contribute is to be prepared by reading the material in advance and saying something in class. Keep in mind that your contribution will be evaluated for quality.

Individual Analysis The Individual analysis is on a Hopworks Urban Brewery (optionally you can analyze a company called HYDS). Introductions to the companies are available on the Bus. 478 Web page. You will need to update the information on the firm you select and its industry as best you can. Your analysis should use the doc. file linked to “Blank Analysis Template” available on the Bus. 478 Web page. Group project and presentationYou will form into groups of five by the 3rd class. Groups should have folks who have a range of skills, and can work well together. You will be evaluating others in the group. The average grade for the group is to be 3.1. If you choose not to fill out a grade form, all group members will receive a 3.15.Your group will write a 5-8 page synopsis of a company of your choice. It will cover the firm’s history, environment, current state and main strategic challenges. At the end of the term your group will present a 35-minute analysis of this firm. The group will then have two days to complete a written analysis of the firm.

Revised: January 11, 2016

Session breakdownMost sessions will include a short lecture on critical chapter points, some strategy based exercise and a case (a 20%, 40% 40% split, respectively). Lecture material, taken from the concepts chapters, is available online in Power Point (an ‘Essentials’ version that I go through in class, and a full version, with audio) at my convenient website: http://www.sfu.ca/~sheppard/478index.html

Ethical ConsiderationsYou are expected to do your own work on the individual assignments. Failure to do so, or plagiarism, or insufficient citation could result in a zero for the assignment.

Course CoverageResponsibility for discussion of case analyses and exercises is the students; the instructor’s role is to facilitate. This is where the majority of the class participation mark is derived. .

Revised: January 11, 2016

Date Topic Detail and Cases Read Due

Bas

ics

Jan. 05 Strategic Management, Performance & Cases Ch. 1, Case Ppt. Performance Ppt.

Jan. 12 External & Internal Environment, Insourcing, IMI Case, & Double-In-Class Practice, Part 1

Ch. 2 & 3, IMI Case, Insourcing,

Double-Practice 1

Jan. 19Bus. & Corp Level StrategyIn-Class Exercise # 1, Part 2 & Toms

Ch. 4 & 6,In-Class Exercise 1,

Toms Case

GroupList

Jan. 26International / Cooperative Strategy,Double-In-Class Practice, Part 2

Ch. 8 & 9In-Class Exercise 1 Double-Practice 2

Feb. 02 Dynamics, Restructuring, Kaskazi 1, Kaskazi 2, In-Class Exercise #2 & Chapter Review

Ch. 5 & 7,In-Class Exercise 2,

Kaskazi 1 & 2

Feb. 05 Revised Due Date for the Company Synopsis Case Synopsis

Feb. 09 Reading Break

App

licat

ions

Feb. 16 Midterm

Feb. 23 Renewal Innovation & Corp. Governance, Juwi Ch. 10 & 13, Juwi

Mar. 1 Control & Rewards, Van Halen & Corning Case Ch. 11, Corning, Van Halen

Mar. 8 Individual: analysis

Preferred: Hopworks Urban Brewery H. U. B. Individual AnalysisOptional: HYDS HYDS

Mar. 15 Leadership & the BP Deepwater Horizon Case Ch. 12, BP Deepwater

Ends

Mar. 22 Case Presentations (Written analysis due Mar. 24)

Mar. 29 Case Presentations (Written analysis due Mar. 31)

Apr. 05 Case Presentations (Written analysis due Apr. 07)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bus 478 Group SelectionCOURSE: BUS 478-3 INSTRUCTOR: Dr. J. SheppardTITLE: Strategy Office: WMX 4387NOTES: http://www.sfu.ca/~sheppard/index.html Phone: 778-782-4918

E-mail: [email protected]

GROUP MEMBERS:

Name Student ID # Title Concentration

CEO

COO

CMO

CFO

CHR

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bus 478 Group EvaluationGroup _________________________

Grades range from 0.0 - 4.4.

Fill in only the column that applies to your group Comments

Title 4 Person Group

5 Person Group

6 Person Group

CEO:

COO:

CMO:

CFO:

CHR:

CIO:

Total: 12.4 15.5 18.6

Revised: January 11, 2016

Analysis Outline

Section of report Grade range is 0.0 –

4.4Form Content

Mission, Objectives, Goals, stakeholders

Updated Information Current Mission Goals & Objectives Stakeholders

If case info. needs updating, update it and bring the audience/reader up to speed.

Provide the firm’s current Mission & Goals. Who’re the stakeholders & what do they want?

General and Industry Environment

Macro Environment (Demographics, Economy, etc.)

Industry Environment (Porter’s 5) Competitors (top 3 or so) What are the industry dynamics

Clearly outline these elements. Industry dynamics include the likelihood of

competitor attach and response and the form these attacks and responses are likely to take given conditions in the environment

Resources and Capabilities / Core Competencies

Resources (Tangible / Intangible) Capabilities (by Functional Area) Core Competencies (VIRO) Performance

Details will be needed (e.g. you should say “Their physical plant is the most modern and efficient in the industry and it allows them to….” rather than simply listing “physical Plant” under a list of tangible resources).

Business, Corp. and International Strategies

Business Level Strategy Corporate Level Strategy International Strategy Cooperative Strategy

Tell me what is their:־ Generic Bus. level strategy is (Cost

Leadership, Diff, Focus, etc.)־ Corp. level strategy (Conglomerate, Vert.

Integration Single bus., etc.)־ International Strategy (Global,

Transnational, Multidomestic).־ Any Joint Ventures, etc.

Synthesis

Firm Strengths & Weaknesses Enviro. Opportunities & Threats SWOT Matrix Does the strategy fit the SWOT

Summarize not only the strengths & weaknesses / opportunities & threats but relate them to each other – how does all that you’ve said so far fit together.

Selecting a Course of Action

Possible Alternatives Criteria by which you will

evaluate Alternatives Evaluation of Alternatives Recommendation

Generate possible alternatives. Evaluate possible courses of action given

mission, SWOT and strategy. Evaluation (Apply the criteria) Recommend (This is a must)

Implementation

Describe Action Plan for implementation

Discuss the logic of Action Plan Are any new organizational

structure or controls needed Criteria to evaluate change success.

Logical & appropriate Action Plan for imple-menting your recommendations (1st this, then)

Review any new organizational structure or controls needed

Criteria by which you will evaluate whether the change was successful.

Average

Analysis Outline

Revised: January 11, 2016

The written version should be no more than 20 page, including cover and citations, no table of contents or exec summary needed, no less than 11 pt, double space, and no less than 1-inch margins. Mix the tables and figures into the text as they are mentioned in the paper.

INTRODUCTIONBackground in Brief The Organization Today

MISSION, GOALS & STAKEHOLDERSMissionGoals and Objectives

1. …2. …

Stakeholders1. …2. …

EXTERNAL ANALYSISGeneral Environment

1. …2. …

Industry Environment1. …2. …

Competitor Analysis1. …2. …

Analysis of Dynamics of External Forces1. …2. …

INTERNAL ANALYSISResources

Tangible1. …2. …

Intangible1. …2. …

Capabilities1. …2. …

Core Competencies1. …2. …3. Three is plenty

Performance1. …2. …

STRATEGYBusiness Level StrategyCorporate Level Strategy

International StrategyCooperative Strategies

SYNTHESISStrengths

1. …2. …

Weaknesses 1. …2. …

Opportunities 1. …2. …

Threats 1. …2. …

SWOT Matrix!SWOT fit with strategy

SELECTING A COURSE OF ACTIONAlternatives

1. …2. …3. …

Criteria for Evaluation 1. … 2. … 3. …

Evaluation Matrix of Criteria to Alternatives

Recommendation Short term Long Term

IMPLEMENTATIONAction Plan Described

1. … 2. …

Rationale for Action Plan New Structure & Control Systems needed Criteria to Evaluate Implementation Success

STUDENT INPUT FOR CLASS Name ________________________

Revised: January 11, 2016

PARTICIPATION GRADE (Due last Class) Student # ________________________

General attendance A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F(Missed Classes) Comments: ___________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

On-time attendance A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F(Late Classes) Comments: ___________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

Minutes of Sleep or A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D FNewspaper Reading Comments: __________________

in Class __________________________________________________________________

Contribution Quantity A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F Comments: ___________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

Contribution Quality A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F Comments: ___________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

Other (Specify) A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F Comments: __________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

Other (Specify) A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F Comments: __________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016

Revised: January 11, 2016