41
Communiqué D D e e s s i i g g n n - - C C h h a a t t Issue # 8 Volume # 2 Bede Design Information "Ad" Series Several years ago (37 years) Bede Aircraft Corp. ran a series of information/advertisements in sport aviation and homebuilt magazines. The series covered quite a few subjects. The series were presented at the Design Group for the members to use as guides to Bede On Design Series Videos. Bede on Design is a series of video tapes which covers seven episodes of aircraft design and the many decisions to be made by the designer. #1 - Understanding Drag #2 - Selecting an Airfoil #3 - Aircraft Wing Design #4 - High Lift Devices #5 - Understanding Stability #6 - Control Surface Design #7 - Engine Cooling “They are easy to understand and quite interesting. They offer simplicity to the concepts that are described in technical detail in other publications. These videos are a great first step and will clearly explain the choices available along with their benefits and compromises. These videos should help the Design Group members by providing the knowledge necessary to begin thinking of their own design requirements. But the will fall short for our experienced aircraft designer or seasoned engineer as being too basic.” Mr. Bede & Designs James R. "Jim" Bede is a controversial aircraft designer, who is often credited with the creation of the modern (the word modern fits well here because other kits right after the Wright Brother can be found) kitplane market. He has designed well over a dozen aircraft since the 1960s, but a sequences of business failures have kept most of these designs out of widespread use. Bede started as an aeronautical engineer at North American Aviation before he left to form his own company in 1961. The goal of Bede Aircraft Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to- fly planes for the homebuilt market. Bede's first design was the BD-1 completed in 1962 and followed by the BD-4 in 1969. These early designs saw moderate success in the aviation market while the experimental BD-2 also set a number of impressive range records. These successes prompted Bede to push the performance envelope even farther with his next design. By 1971, he had finished the BD-5 that, like its earlier cousins, was powered by a piston engine. Bede also developed a jet derivative of the same airframe that was called the BD-5J. This jet version soon captured widespread attention thanks to its impressive displays at air shows. The BD-5J has held the Guinness record as the World's Smallest Jet Aircraft for more than a quarter century. Versions of it saw use in various Budweiser commercials (the Bud Light Jet, which was lost in an in flight fire and crash unrelated to air show work). The tiny jet also appeared in two James Bond movies; Octopussy starring Sir Roger Moore, and later in a cameo appearance, hanging from the wall of Q's workshop in Die Another Day starring Pierce Brosnan as Agent 007. The BD-1 was the first design of American aeronautical engineer Jim Bede. The BD-1 was designed in 1960 as a kit-built aircraft intended for home assembly by amateur builders. Design goals included a kit price of $US 2500, including a rebuilt 100 hp (75 kW) engine and a cruise speed of 130 knots (240 km/h). The prototype N624BD first flew in 1962. The BD-1 eventually became the American Aviation Corporation's AA- 1.

COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

  • Upload
    buidiep

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

Communiqué DDeessiiggnn--CChhaatt

Issue # 8 Volume # 2

BBeeddee DDeessiiggnn IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn ""AAdd"" SSeerriieess

Several years ago (37 years) Bede Aircraft Corp. ran a series of information/advertisements in sport aviation and homebuilt magazines. The series covered quite a few subjects. The series were presented at the Design Group for the members to use as guides to Bede On Design Series Videos. Bede on Design is a series of video tapes which covers seven episodes of aircraft design and the many decisions to be made by the designer. #1 - Understanding Drag #2 - Selecting an Airfoil #3 - Aircraft Wing Design #4 - High Lift Devices #5 - Understanding Stability #6 - Control Surface Design #7 - Engine Cooling “They are easy to understand and quite interesting. They offer simplicity to the concepts that are described in technical detail in other publications. These videos are a great first step and will clearly explain the choices available along with their benefits and compromises. These videos should help the Design Group members by providing the knowledge necessary to begin thinking of their own design requirements. But the will fall short for our experienced aircraft designer or seasoned engineer as being too basic.”

MMrr.. BBeeddee && DDeessiiggnnss James R. "Jim" Bede is a controversial aircraft designer, who is often credited with the creation of the modern (the word modern fits well here because other kits right after the Wright Brother can be found) kitplane market. He has designed well over a dozen aircraft since the 1960s, but a

sequences of business failures have kept most of these designs out of widespread use. Bede started as an aeronautical engineer at North American Aviation before he left to form his own company in 1961. The goal of Bede Aircraft Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes for the homebuilt market. Bede's first design was the BD-1 completed in 1962 and followed by the BD-4 in 1969. These early designs saw moderate success in the aviation market while the experimental BD-2 also set a number of impressive range records. These successes prompted Bede to push the performance envelope even farther with his next design. By 1971, he had finished the BD-5 that, like its earlier cousins, was powered by a piston engine. Bede also developed a jet derivative of the same airframe that was called the BD-5J. This jet version soon captured widespread attention thanks to its impressive displays at air shows. The BD-5J has held the Guinness record as the World's Smallest Jet Aircraft for more than a quarter century. Versions of it saw use in various Budweiser commercials (the Bud Light Jet, which was lost in an in flight fire and crash unrelated to air show work). The tiny jet also appeared in two James Bond movies; Octopussy starring Sir Roger Moore, and later in a cameo appearance, hanging from the wall of Q's workshop in Die Another Day starring Pierce Brosnan as Agent 007. The BD-1 was the first design of American aeronautical engineer Jim Bede. The BD-1 was designed in 1960 as a kit-built aircraft intended for home assembly by amateur builders. Design goals included a kit price of $US 2500, including a rebuilt 100 hp (75 kW) engine and a cruise speed of 130 knots (240 km/h). The prototype N624BD first flew in 1962. The BD-1 eventually became the American Aviation Corporation's AA-1.

Page 2: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

The BD-1 was a simple and fairly conventional low-wing two-seat design that used some of the latest techniques in aircraft construction that larger companies such as Cessna generally ignored. The fuselage was built primarily of aluminum honeycomb adhesively bonded together instead of riveted. This not only made the plane light, but also very strong; it was to be fully aerobatic and stressed to 9g. Performance would likewise be excellent, estimated at 130 knots (240 km/h) with a 100 hp engine, compared to a Cessna 150 which reached about 90 knots (165 km/h) with a similar engine. In order to make the plane more practical for the average owner, the wings could be folded and the aircraft towed behind a car, allowing it to be stored at home in a garage and towed to the airport. The kit, including a rebuilt 65 hp engine, would list for US$ 2,500. Versions with more powerful engines were also offered, one with a 108 hp Lycoming O-235 listing at $4,200. Development dragged on and eventually burned through a tremendous amount of money without delivering a final design. The investors finally gave up and forced Bede to leave the company in 1966. They re-formed in 1968 as American Aviation in order to produce the design in complete form as the AA-1 Yankee. A number of changes were later introduced into the design to make it more stable, notably a larger horizontal tail, and then a more forgiving airfoil on the main wing. The AA-1 and follow-on designs became fairly popular, notably the four-seat AA-5 Traveler. The company was later purchased by Grumman, becoming Grumman American. Bede also worked on a number of other designs. One of these was the XBD-2, an experimental boundary layer control design based on a system designed by the Aero physics Department of Mississippi State University. The system used

164,000 holes drilled into the surface of the wing to suck air from the boundary layer into the interior of the wing, thereby reducing skin friction for better performance, as well as keeping the boundary layer "attached" over a wider variety of angle of attacks and thereby increasing lift during high-angle flight and doubling maximum lift as a result. Other interesting design features were the use of two engines driving a common pusher propeller, aluminum honeycomb panels, and fiberglass landing gear struts. After 50 hours of testing the aircraft was donated to the Experimental Aircraft Association. The basic layout of the XBD-2 was also used in the BD-3 pusher design, but this did not progress beyond paper studies. An "executive version" was also designed as the BD-7, again without progressing past the early design stage. After being forced from what became American Aviation, Bede tried his hand at a record breaking around-the-world flight in a specially modified Schweizer 2-32 powered glider he called the BD-2. He nicknamed the airplane "LOVE", a

contraction of "Low Orbit, Very Efficient". The aircraft was modified to dramatically increase fuel tankage to 565 gallons (2,140 l), which included the addition of two large tanks in the fuselage, sealing the wings to turn them into tanks, and adding tankage on the wing-tips as well. It was completed in April 1966 (although other sources say 1968), and while he did not attempt its two-hop-around-the-world trip, Bede set several distance and endurance records, including a 70-hour endurance record in October 1969. This flight only ended after an electrical failure, just under 9,000 miles (14,500nbsp;km)being covered by that point. Bede remained convinced of the validity of the kit built market, and re-formed his company as Bede Aircraft. Here he started the design of an even simpler-to-build aircraft, the Bede BD-4. The BD-4 used more conventional construction techniques, based on a simple high-wing design, and had few curved surfaces. Most of the fuselage was flat aluminum sheeting, the only major components with compound curves being the engine cowling and landing gear spats which were made of fiberglass. One real innovation was the "panel-rib" construction which reduced building time of the wing. Basically the wing was constructed in sections consisting of a rib whose upper edge was "extended" horizontally to become one section of the wing surface as well. The wing was built up by sliding these sections together over the circular spar and fastening them together where they met.

Page 3: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

Like the BD-1, the BD-4 offered excellent performance; using the same 108 hp Lycoming O-235 as the AA-1 it could reach 130 knots. It could also be equipped with engines up to 220 hp, which was to top out at 190 knots (350 km/h) with a 170 kt (315 km/h) low-power cruise. The aircraft could be completed with either tricycle or tail-dragger configurations.

The BD-4 first appeared in 1968 and became a "hit". Thousands of plans were sold, hundreds were built, and many are still flying today. Unfortunately the early performance estimates turned out to be overstated; even with the large engines speeds were more typically 130-150 kt (240-280 km/h). Even while the BD-4 was maturing, Bede turned to a more ambitious design, the BD-5 Micro.

The Micro was an extremely small one-seat design that looked more like the jet fighter than prop plane, with the pilot sitting in a semi-reclined position under a large fighter-like Plexiglas canopy. The fuselage was originally meant to be constructed primarily from fiberglass panels over an aluminum frame, housing a two-cylinder air-cooled 40 hp engine driving a pusher propeller. The economics of mass production later convinced the designer to switch to hydro formed all-metal aluminum components. The aircraft featured retractable gear, split flaps, spoilers to slow down for landing, and a V-tail for decreased drag in cruise. Two versions were planned, the BD-5A with "short" wings tuned for high speeds, and the BD-5B with 4 ft (1.2 m) longer wings for longer range and powered glider use. Performance of the BD-5A was predicted to be 210 mph (340 km/h) in cruise. Although Bede had apparently first looked at the design as early as 1967, work on the BD-4 meant he was not able put any serious effort into it until about 1970. Work on a prototype started in earnest late that year, and they published an information booklet about it in early 1971. Magazine articles appeared even at this early point, most notably a very well-known article in Popular Science. On 24 February 1971 the first $200 deposit to reserve a "place in line" to receive a kit was accepted, with the target

shipping date being 24 May 1972. By the end of the year, they had over 4,000 such orders, making it one of the most popular aircraft in modern history. The prototype flew briefly on 12 September 1971, powered by a 36 hp Polaris Industries snowmobile engine. The stability of the aircraft with the original V-tail was marginal at best, and clearly needed a redesign. In early 1972 Bede hired Burt Rutan to head the flight test department, and he quickly introduced a number of improvements. Most notable was a new "conventional" tail design of somewhat larger size, and a slightly lengthened fuselage. The shorter wing also turned out to be a bad idea; the speed at which it became more efficient was very close to the aircraft's maximum speed. It was replaced by the -5B wing which increased the wingspan to 21 ft (6.4 m). Spoilers and split flaps also disappeared during this period. A most serious problem was the continued failure of the engines. In order to meet weight limitations the design required an engine weighing in at less than 100 lb (45 kg). This wouldn't have been too much of a problem given the original goal of using a 40 hp engine, but as the design matured it was realized that much more power would be needed, around 65 to 70 hp. This made the use of any "off-the-shelf" aircraft engine basically impossible. Instead Bede selected a two-stroke engine which offered much better power-to-weight ratios. The plane entered testing with the 440 cc Polaris design, but this was replaced with a similar one from Keikhaefer Aeromarine. This engine proved to be extremely unreliable, and was itself replaced by an engine from Hirth Motoren available in 40, 65 and 70 hp versions. By this point the basic aircraft design was already long considered complete, and Bede offered the kit with the engine to follow. This was a fairly attractive option; it meant the builder could "get to work" and hopefully complete the airframe by the time the engine arrived. The price for new buyers had risen to $2,999 with the 70 hp engine, which was now considered the minimum due to low performance with the original 40 hp design. Those who had sent in their deposits earlier could still pay only $1,799 and receive the smaller engine, or could pay the difference and receive the larger version. Additionally, Bede decided to seek FAA certification of the BD-5D as a production aircraft and sell it complete, as well as in kit form, taking $600 deposits for this model. Rutan left at about this point, although stories vary as to why. The BD-5D generated even more interest, apparently receiving 6,900 deposits in the next few months. At that point, unexpectedly, Hirth went bankrupt. Once again the design lacked a suitable engine, but this time the search for a replacement ended with a Xenoah design from Japan. Development of this engine was lengthy, and in the end it would not be certified for export until 1978, although this was not expected at the time. Throughout this period one of the major problems was cooling in the engine compartment, which

Page 4: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

should have been expected due to its location out of the direct airflow around the aircraft. While the new engine was being tested, Bede decided to create an unconventional variant of the BD-5 with a small jet engine. The result was the BD-5J, a 300 mph (480 km/h) aircraft that looked fast while sitting on the ramp. The design used the Sermel TRS-18-046 turbojet (now Microturbo, a division of Turbomeca, in itself a division of Groupe Safran), which produced 225 lb thrust. The original engines were produced under license by Ames Industrial in the US. Bede also moved on to design the BD-6, a smaller BD-

4 with the Hirth engine, and the "new" Bede BD-7, a two-seat side-by-side version of the BD-5 of which a prototype was built. There was even an attempt to sidestep the engine problem with the

lengthened wings and no engine, which prompted Air Progress magazine sarcastically note, At last, a BD-5 with no engine problems. This glider version did not fly very well and the project was scrapped.

BD-5S, a glider (S for Sailplane) version with

hen 1974 came around, the engines were still

fter more than 5,100 kits had been delivered to

any owners abandoned their kits, some of

rashes in the B models were generally due to

Wnot being delivered. The primary reason for this was the insistence by Xenoah's lawyers that engines delivered for use in the experimental kit aircraft (which did not require FAA certification) had to be tested to the same rigorous standards as engines destined for the certified BD-5D model. This created an insurmountable economic dilemma for the manufacturer, who chose not to deliver any engines. For Bede it meant that even though they had found the perfect engine for the BD-5, Xenoah's failure to deliver struck the company a death blow. Aprospective builders, the kits stopped shipping as well. Although the company was effectively bankrupt at this point, work on the BD-5D continued for some time. The bankruptcy became official in 1979, by which point the BD-5 project was long dead. During the bankruptcy proceedings it was learned that the money ostensibly being used to build kits was instead being spent on a variety of projects. As a result,

Bede entered a consent decree with the FTC to no longer accept deposits on aircraft for a period of ten years. Mwhich were incomplete, but a few hundred diehard builders finished them with a variety of third party engine installation designs. Over the next few years the aircraft garnered what at first glance appears to be a terrible safety record. In fact, close analysis of the NTSB reports reveals that the problem was much more related to the pilots than to the tiny airplane. No properly constructed BD-5 has ever suffered a structural failure, nor was any design feature of the BD-5B determined to be a primary factor in contributing to any accident. The -5A models were another story -- all four examples crashed on their first flight, with three fatalities, largely a side effect of a 100 mph (160 km/h) landing speed combined with the tiny wheelbase (which led to the early discontinuance of the short A-wing). Nevertheless, the current record holder of the FAI C-1a/0 (300 kg or less takeoff weight) class speed record over a 3km course at restricted altitude is a BD-5A (listed as BD-5B but used -5A wings for the record attempt) with a Rotax 618UL 74 horsepower two-stroke, three-cylinder water-cooled engine.[1]

Cthe failure of the pilot to fly the aircraft after an engine failure on takeoff, both due to the mix of "oddball" engines as well as endemic cooling problems. The reason this is such an issue with the BD-5 is twofold -- the high line of thrust means an engine failure immediately results in a nose-up attitude, and the pilots who failed to fly the aircraft first and then attempt to restart the engine inevitably stalled, with the associated consequences. This was not the only problem; the original wing had a very sharp stall with little warning, related to incorrectly bent wing skins. Harry Riblett also produced a slight reprofile of the wing root airfoil of the wing softened the stall response of the aircraft, but it presented other unique problems associated with the way the reprofile was to be performed -- essentially gluing foam to the aluminum skin and covering with fiberglass. A rather small center of gravity range was also improved some by stretching the fuselage, but that hasn't been determined to be a cause of accidents except when pilots deliberately flew the aircraft with a CG well outside the allowable range. Many other changes have also been incorporated to improve the original design. Today the BD-5 is a rewarding, if demanding aircraft. There are examples of the

Page 5: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

aircraft that have amassed more than 800 hours of trouble-free operation! Bob Bishop had purchased 20 BD-5J kits as soon as they had appeared, and many of the flying examples started life in this batch of twenty. Many of these were completed over the years, and a number have been involved in crashes, usually due to lack of proper maintenance, insufficient training and knowledge of the systems and their operation, and in one case an incapacitating medical condition which led to a crash where investigators concluded the pilot must have died quite a few seconds before the crash. Versions from the original batch became a popular airshow fixture, and Bishop has gone on to log more than 1,500 hours in his jets, which he now operates for military customers as a cruise missile surrogate. Throughout the 1980s until 1991, Coors flew two of them as the "Silver Bullets." Budweiser also had a BD-5J called the Bud Light Jet, but that contract has long expired, the aircraft was lost after an incorrectly specified fuel flow sensor burst in mid-flight, causing a fire

in the engine compartment (the pilot traded speed for altitude, bailed out and was unharmed; the aircraft was lost). The aircraft also appeared in the opening sequence of the James Bond film, Octopussy. The last BD-5J that remained on the airshow circuit, Scott Manning's Stinger Jet, crashed on June 16, 2006 at Ottawa/Carp Airport, Canada, while practicing for an air show, killing pilot Manning. The month of June 2006 was very bad for BD-5J's -- an Acrojet Special BD-5J property of Aerial Productions, Inc. impacted trees the morning June 27 on final approach to the Ocean City Municipal Airport in Ocean City, Maryland, killing pilot Chuck Lischer, a highly experienced professional airshow pilot. The airplane was involved in radar testing as part of its services to

the military as a certified cruise missile surrogate. The BD-5J has also held the Guinness record for the World's Smallest Jet for more than 25 years. Bob Bishop originally garnered the record with one of his jets, and in November 2004 the record changed hands to Juan Jiménez of San Juan, Puerto Rico, whose BD-5J weighed in at 358.8 lbs (162.8 kg) empty weight, 80 lbs (36 kg) lighter than Bishop's jet. The primary difference that led to the decrease in weight is the use of an earlier Microturbo turbojet, the 022 Cougar, which weighs 68 lbs (31 kg) soaking wet, is much simpler than the TRS-18 and does not require a high pressure fuel system with all of its associated hardware. Bede has hinted at a two-seat tandem version of the aircraft called the "Super BD-5" using a certified aircraft engine and a number of modifications and improvements, but to date nothing other than a |preliminary design drawing has been made available. By the late 1970s, Bede had run out of time to save the BD-5. Many of the people who bought kits began to sell them at a fraction of initial cost. Hoping to generate cash, Bede dabbled briefly with a sailplane version, and his jet-powered BD-5 became popular at air shows. By 1979, Bede was bankrupt and the BD-5 kitplane saga ended. Budd Davisson summed it up well when he said: "Too much was said early in the game, promises were made, performance figures quoted and money taken. So, when things didn't go like clockwork, the BD buying public got a little bit ticked off." After Bede Aviation collapsed, Bede took on a number of engineering projects under Bede Design. One of the first was a project with his cousin to produce a car. Simply called the Bede Car, the design used an 80 hp motorcycle engine driving a ducted fan for propulsion. Built primarily from fiberglass on aluminum, the car was to have weighed just under 1,000 lb (500 kg), less than half that of a normal four seater built of steel. The advantage to the design was a claimed 120 miles/gallon (2.0 L/100 km) fuel economy, although in retrospect this seems ridiculously optimistic. Bede Industries, his cousin's company, intended to introduce the car starting in 1982, but the prototype unit proved the concept infeasible. The engine had very low power at low speeds, so low that it could not even roll up an inclined driveway for parking without "gunning" it. There was some talk of adding electric motors for low speed operation and reversing, but it is not clear if these were fitted. The fate of the prototype is unknown. Another automobile project followed, this time a smaller motorcycle-like vehicle. The prototype was based on a production motorcycle, but "stretched" and surrounded with a fiberglass shell that looked somewhat like the BD-5. During its long gestation period it was known as the Autocycle or BD-200, and later as the LiteStar and Pulse. About 360 of these were produced and sold.

Page 6: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

During this time he was also involved with a

Page 7: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

project to build an inexpensive BD-4-based aircraft for use in Africa, but this project petered out. He also worked on new aircraft designs, including the BD-8, a single-place acrobatic

aircraft. A single example was built and sold to Mike Huffman, who finished the plane and first showed it during Oshkosh exhibit of 1980. He also apparently worked on a powered parachute during this period. Within weeks of the FTC Consent Decree expiring in 1989, Bede announced the design of a new two-seat high-speed jet, the Bede BD-10. The original idea appears to have come from a friend, Mike Van Wagenen. He formed a company specially for this project, Bede Jet at the Spirit of St. Louis Airport in Chesterfield, MO (just outside St. Louis). Having learned from the BD-5 that using an untested engine was a bad idea, he selected the smallest production engine he could find in quantity, the General Electric J85, and wrapped an airframe around it. The resulting design bore some resemblance to the T-38 Talon/F-5 Freedom Fighter, which were powered by two examples of the same J85 engine. Performance estimates were fantastic: after brake release on the runway the 1,580 lb (715 kg) aircraft could climb to 10,000 feet (3050 m) in under 60 seconds, would cruise for 2,000 miles (3,200 km) at up to 45,000 ft (13,700 m) altitude in a 9 psi (465 mm Hg) pressurized cabin, and could reach supersonic speeds of up to Mach 1.4. Bede's prototype was completed in 1992 and started testing, although it suffered minor

damage when the gear collapsed during early testing. It was then sent to the Reno Air Races in 1994 to drum up sales, and eventually 63 $10,000 deposits were placed (according to Aviation Week and Space Technology). The prototype also suffered wrinkling of the skin on the vertical tail, indicating inadequate strength and forcing a redesign. In further flight testing the performance estimates proved to be "optimistic". Over the design period the weight had ballooned from 1,600 lb (725 kg) to 2,800 lb (1,270 kg) and fuel tankage had to be cut, which dramatically reduced range from the original 2,000 miles (3,200 km) to a mere 400 to 500 (650 to 800 km). Speed was equally poor; even at full thrust the plane was barely able to reach the transonic, at Mach 0.83. Skip Holm, the test pilot, left the program some time in 1993 and the project essentially ended at that point. It appears only two kits were completed. Bede had already entered an arrangement with Van Wagenen who had formed Fox 10 to help kit builders complete their planes, and in December 1993 they took over the project and reformed as Peregrine Flight International. They intended to sell completed versions of the BD-10 as the PJ-2. Military rights were sold to Monitor Jet of Canada, who intended to equip it with the Pratt & Whitney Canada JT15D engine and sell it as a basic trainer as the MJ-7. Monitor purchased the single so-far completed kit as well. Peregrine's first prototype was completed later that year, and entered testing. Although it had been modified to incorporate the stronger tail of Bede's design, it broke up mid-air on 30 December when the vertical stabilizers failed due to an apparent cross flow condition, killing Van Wagenen. The NTSB later concluded that Bede's fix was under-designed, and offered nowhere near the strength that had been calculated. However, there was no evidence that Peregrine had performed any real testing to verify the redesign of the vertical stabilizer spars before rushing to continue flight testing. Peregrine then redesigned the horizontal surfaces for a second prototype which crashed in August 1995 when one flap failed to deploy (a problem which also plagued the early F-104 Starfighter). The resulting accident killed the new company president, Joseph Henderson, and Peregrine ceased to exist.

Page 8: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

The civilian side of the design later passed to Vortex of California in 1997 when Bede Jet declared bankruptcy. Vortex intended to produce it as the PhoenixJet, but nothing ever came of this. The original prototype is currently hangared in Scottsdale, Arizona, and belongs to Fuel Fresh Inc. Monitor Jet's example eventually ended up in the Toronto Aerospace Museum along with their JT-15D engine, and has recently been sold to the Canadian Flying Machine Museum, operated by aviation enthusiast David Carlaw. The second completed kit broke up in mid-air in waters off the southern coast of California in 2003. During the BD-10 project, Bede also started the design of updated BD-5's with two and four seats as the Bede BD-12 and Bede BD-14 respectively. They were designed under the reformed Bede Aircraft, also in Chesterfield.

Once again deposits were accepted and held in escrow in order to hold a "place in line" for kit delivery. The introductory price for orders placed before January 1995 was $18,900 with the smallest engine. Additionally Bede signed up dealers (reportedly at $250,000) who would help customers build their planes. A considerable amount of work was put into using the latest construction techniques in order to reduce construction time; the BD-12 consisted of only a few hundred parts in total. When built at one of the sites, it was claimed the plane could be completed and flown away in two weeks. Eventually something on the order of 250 deposits were received. By early 1995 the BD-12 prototype had still not flown, and work on the BD-14 had not even started. That summer the almost-complete BD-12 was shipped to Oshkosh, where it generated some buzz. By this time the prototype ended up being seriously tail heavy, and in order to move the center of gravity back to a reasonable position for a test flight, 170 lb (77 kg) of lead was added in the nose. The prototype finally flew in the fall of 1995, but was almost completely

destroyed on its first flight due to marginal stability. The plane did not appear at the 1996 Oshkosh show, although it was claimed the program was continuing. Months later it became clear that Bede's company was once again in financial trouble. They were evicted from their hangar in Chesterfield, and moved to a new space in Alton, IL. The engineers were owed considerable back pay, and work basically ended. Although the deposits were claimed to be in escrow, it appears Bede secured a line of credit against the escrow accounts, which were then seized, leaving kit builders in the lurch again. Bede has once again re-formed a new design shop as BedeAmerica Aerosport. In 1998 he appeared at Oshkosh promoting a BD-16, a six-place version of the BD-4. However these plans apparently did not generate a lot of interest, and he has since moved on to the single-seat BD-17 Nugget and two-seat BD-18, both based on a layout similar to the original BD-1 but dramatically updated.

The BD-17 was first announced in 2000 and was even simpler than the BD-12, consisting of only 110 parts. It entered flight testing in 2003 and proved to have excellent flight qualities. Notes Bede re-used naming on several occasions which makes things somewhat confusing. The BD-2 name was used twice, on both the experimental boundary layer control design (XBD-2) as well as the later powered glider. BD-7 was also used twice, once for the earlier aircraft based on the XBD-2, and later for the two-seat BD-5.

Page 9: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 10: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

Jim Bede designed numerous aircraft. But, he seemed to fail at designing a business model which would hold up to his aircraft designs. Many would say he was a great salesman but a very ineffective manager of resources. He also made many calms on specification and prices which never materialized. The BD-4 design kept his company going before the BD-5 doomed the company. His BD-1 helped start a new line of aircraft and there are thousands of American Aviation and Grumman American airplanes out there flying which got there start with that design. The BD-4 was successful at bring sport aviation into the kit aircraft business as we know it today. Before Mr. Bede and the BD-4 you could not build a homebuilt aircraft from a complete kit. A kit with all the nuts and bolts, premolded glass parts, material kits, performed metal parts, landing gear and engine and prop packages was just not done together. There was also a company newsletter to help support builders after the sale. We take all of these things for granted in a kit today. I was going to do a simple write up on Mr. Bede and his designs but come to an end with this long newsletter. His history of business and designs is known to many. I hope everyone enjoys this issue.

WWhhaatt tthhiiss iiss aanndd wwhhaatt iitt iiss nnoott!! It is important to remember that this newsletter is merely a conduit for information passed among members sharing their experiences. Its established purpose is fellowship and encouragement. IItt iiss NNOOTT tthhee iinntteenntt ttoo ggiivvee aauutthhoorriittaattiivvee aaddvviiccee oonn aaiirrccrraafftt ccoonnssttrruuccttiioonn oorr ddeessiiggnn.. All contributing writers disclaim any liability for accuracy or suitability of information that is shared. You can assume that all or some of the information in each issue is not correct for aircraft design. This is simply a collection of notes which where taken at the Design Group meeting and placed with other items into a newsletter format. Lots of items will come from the meeting as best as one can interpret what is stated. Many items will come from other sources such as books and internet files (Grabbing from any source to make it useful) and a lot will come from the internet to expand what was talked about at the meeting, like the Reynolds number material in this issue. (I will take it where I can get it.) Most of this issue would not have been possible without WWiikkiippeeddiiaa,, the free encyclopedia Speak out if you were wrongly quoted or something misinterpreted, no harm was implied, only lack of knowledge in understanding and interpreting what was said. So with that said. Welcome to the second year of the newsletter. If others would like to contribute articles, stories and materials in the future feel free. The

newsletter should provide a way for us to communicate with each other. It is a place for those of us who want to network, connect and share information to do so. Anyone can write anything to whomever about any aircraft or aviation design ideas. With any luck we will learn something from everyone and hopefully someone can learn one thing from us.

Me ting Schedule:MMeeeeettiinng Sg Scchheedduullee::

2007 Meeting Schedule

10:00 am FlaBob Airport

Chapter One Hanger

JJuunnee 2233 July NNoo MMeeeettiinngg August 25 September 22 October 27 November 24 December 15

Check this site for any schedule updates

and changes.

http://www.eaach1.org/calen.html

Check this site for newsletters http://www.eaach1.org/design.html

Page 11: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes

The Author: - -

James Richard Bede

James Richard Bede graduated from the University of Wichita (Kansas) in 1957 with a Degree in Aeronautical Engineering. He worked at North American Aviation, Columbus, Ohio for two years as a performance engineer on the F4 and AJ3 aircraft, before leaving in 1960 to form Bede Aircraft Corporation.

His first design (July, 1961) was the XBD-2, an experimental pusher-propeller aircraft powered by two 0-300 Continental engines linked to a common propeller shaft and driving a three-bladed shrouded propeller. An advanced aerodynamic concept evaluated with this aircraft was a boundary- layer control system which increased wing lift efficiency by over 200%.

Following the XBD-2 came the BD-I, which is now the Grumman-American Aviation "Yankee" Then came the BD-2, which began as an engineering design exercise for Jim Bede. The BD-2 is a long-range, high-efficiency, single-engine aircraft that Jim flew to three world endurance records in November 1969, flying non-stop and without refuelling on a closed course for 8,974 miles in a time of 70 hours, 15 minutes.

The BD-4 was introduced in August 1968 and is a two-place/four-place, high-wing, fixed-gear design that incorporated many new and innovative construction features. Designed specifically as a homebuilt, many hundreds are still under construction both in the United States and overseas, and more than one hundred are flying.

The BD-5 design was introduced in late 1971 and is available either as a homebuilt or ready- manufactured aircraft (production of the BD-5D is scheduled to begin at the end of 1974), and more than 11,000 orders have been placed for this single-engine, single-place sport aircraft.

The BD-53 jet-powered version of the BD-5 is an extension of that pusher-propeller design, and the 300 mph hot-rod of the air has received more than a passing interest from the world of general aviation. The BD-SJ is available only as a homebuilt at this time, but interest in the little jet is so intense that the possibility of going into full production of this design is seriously being studied.

Jim,Bede is .oneof this country's leading aeronautical engineers, and 1974 - as well as the years ahead - will see the,introduction of many more new and exciting designs.

This book is the first in a series of design information and useful engineering data, researched and written by Jim Bede. It is a collection originally published in both Sport Aviation magazine and Aviation Mechanics Journal.

Page 12: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 13: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 14: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 15: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 16: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 17: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 18: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 19: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 20: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 21: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 22: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 23: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 24: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 25: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 26: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 27: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 28: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 29: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 30: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 31: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 32: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 33: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 34: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 35: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 36: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 37: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 38: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 39: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 40: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes
Page 41: COMM 8 vs 2 - ZoomAviationzoomaviation.com/programs/charts/bede_design_series.pdfsport aviation and homebuilt magazines. ... Corporation was to develop low-cost and easy-to-fly planes