84

commentary case 5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: commentary case 5
Page 2: commentary case 5

Commentary case

By

Prof. Dr. : Fawzy Megahed

Page 3: commentary case 5

A 46-year-old woman developed progressive dyspnea over

a 2-month period.

Page 4: commentary case 5

The condition started 2 years ago when shedeveloped intermittent, dull, left-sided retro-orbital headaches. These were not associatedwith nausea, vomiting, photophobia, or flashlights, nor were severe enough to interrupther daily routine.

Page 5: commentary case 5

One month later, she suddenly lost vision in her left eye and was diagnosed with a retinal

detachment.

Page 6: commentary case 5

2 month later ,she started feeling dizzy anddeveloped an ataxic gait. She also appearedwithdrawn and had a decreased appetite,which her family attributed to the recentvisual loss .

Page 7: commentary case 5

3 months later , she had lost nearly 40pounds. She started having intermittentepisodes of hyperventilation that wouldresolve spontaneously.

Page 8: commentary case 5

However, these episodes became morefrequent and prolonged and she developedconfusion, drowsiness, and generalizedweakness. 5 months later , she was admittedfor continuous hyperventilation andrespiratory distress .

Page 9: commentary case 5

Arterial blood gas analysis revealed a severerespiratory alkalosis with a pH 7.56 and PCO29 mm Hg.

Page 10: commentary case 5

Review of systems revealed no history offever, infections, rashes, ulcers, myalgias,joint pain, or paresthesias. She denied anyexposure to toxins and reported no sickcontacts .

Page 11: commentary case 5

Examination

• She was a thin woman in mild distress from tachypnea with a respiratory rate of 30 breaths per minute

• Oxygen saturation was 100% on 2 liters nasal cannula.

Page 12: commentary case 5

• She was normotensive with a regularheart rate and rhythm.

• Her mouth was dry and no ulcers wereseen.

• There were no skin rashes.

Page 13: commentary case 5

Neurologic examination:-

• She was drowsy and oriented only to herselfbut followed simple commands.

• Speech was clear.

• Sensation was intact.

Page 14: commentary case 5

• Her right pupil was 3 mm and reactive to lightand her left pupil had post-surgical findings.

• Visual fields were normal in her right eye.She had no vision in her left eye.

• Eye movements were full, with slightlydecreased upgaze.

Page 15: commentary case 5

• Motor exam revealed a spastic tone in theright limbs compared to the left. There wasright arm and leg drift with 4/5 strength.Strength on the left was 4+/5.

Page 16: commentary case 5

• Muscle stretch reflexes were asymmetric,being 3+ in right arm and patella and 2+ inleft arm and patella.

• Clonus was present in both feet but more onthe right.

Page 17: commentary case 5

To summarize the case ………….

Page 18: commentary case 5

Our patient presented with a headacheand retinal detachment 1 month beforeshe developed neurological symptomsthat localized to the brainstem(dizziness and ataxia). As thesesymptoms worsened, she developedprogressive hyperventilation over a 2-month period.

Page 19: commentary case 5

What is yourdifferentialdiagnosis ?

Page 20: commentary case 5

• Multiple Sclerosis

• Sarcoidosis.

• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

• Sjögren’s Syndrome

• Primary CNS Vasculitis.

• Vogt-koyanagi-harada (VKH) Syndrome

• Cerebral Lymphoma

• Others

Page 21: commentary case 5

What should be the next step ?

Page 22: commentary case 5

Brain MRI showed extensive

hyperintense signal changes on FLAIR and T2-weighted images involving the supratentorialwhite matter, midbrain, pons, medulla,middle cerebellar peduncles, and part of thebasal ganglia and thalami.

Page 23: commentary case 5

There was no restriction of diffusion ondiffusion-weighted images. There waswidespread sulcal effacement and cisternaleffacement .

Page 24: commentary case 5
Page 25: commentary case 5

Intracranial MRA revealed

mild irregularity and stenosis of thesupraclinoid segments of both internalcarotid arteries and the A1 segment of theright anterior cerebral artery.

Page 26: commentary case 5

There was moderate stenosis of the inferiordivision of the right middle cerebral arteryand irregularity and mild fusiform dilatationof the distal M2 segment.

Page 27: commentary case 5

• There was also mild stenosis of the superiordivision of the left middle cerebral artery andirregularity in the M2 segment .

• MRI of the cervical spinal cord was

normal.

Page 28: commentary case 5
Page 29: commentary case 5

•WHAT ARE THE NEXT INVESTIGATIONS?

Page 30: commentary case 5

Serology was negative for ANA, Anti SSB, antiSSA, Anti JO, Anti centromere, Anti ds DNA,Anti ribosomal, Anti smith, and Anti SM/RNPantibodies. ANCA / MPO / PR3 testing wasnegative.

Page 31: commentary case 5

• Serology was negative for HIV, HTLV, HSV, JCvirus and a paraneoplastic work-up wasnegative.

• Testing for skin pathergy was negative

Page 32: commentary case 5

•CSF analysis showed lymphocytic

pleocytosis and an elevated proteinconcentration of 52 mg/dL.

• Testing for oligoclonal bands, myelin

basic protein, and IgG index were positive.

Page 33: commentary case 5

What is yourdifferentialdiagnosis ?

Page 34: commentary case 5

What is the next step ?

Page 35: commentary case 5

Brain biopsy

Page 36: commentary case 5

Brain biopsy of the right frontal lobe

demonstrated necrosis and perivascularinflammation of multiple venules infiltratedpredominantly by lymphocytic inflammatorycells

Page 37: commentary case 5
Page 38: commentary case 5

Perivenous demyelination was not identified(confirmed by Luxol Fast Blue and CD68immunostaining) .

Neither arteritis nor encephalitis wasidentified.

Page 39: commentary case 5
Page 40: commentary case 5

To summarize the case ………….

Page 41: commentary case 5

Our patient presented with a headacheand retinal detachment 1 month beforeshe developed neurological symptomsthat localized to the brainstem(dizziness and ataxia). As thesesymptoms worsened, she developedprogressive hyperventilation over a 2-month period.

Page 42: commentary case 5

Brain MRI showed extensive increased signalon FLAIR and T2-weighted images, mainlyaffecting the white matter bilaterally but alsoin the basal ganglia and thalami, andsymmetrically extending from the cerebralhemispheres down to the brainstem andeventually into the upper cervical spinal cord.

Page 43: commentary case 5

• Intracranial MRA showed several areas ofmild irregularity and stenosis suggestive ofcerebral vasculitis.

• Brain biopsy, however, revealed venulitis andnecrosis with no evidence of arteritis ordemyelination .

Page 44: commentary case 5

Thus, the clinical, radiological, andpathological findings were most consistentwith …………………………..

Page 45: commentary case 5
Page 46: commentary case 5

Neuro-Behcet’s disease

Page 47: commentary case 5

The patient was treated withmethylprednisolone 1000 mg IV once dailyfor 5 days followed by prednisone 60 mgorally once daily.

Page 48: commentary case 5

During this period, an ulceration in thevermillion border of the patient’s left upperlip was noted

After beginning corticosteroids there wasremarkable improvement in her mentalstatus and hyperventilation and she wasdischarged to a rehabilitation facility.

Page 49: commentary case 5

Further work-up revealed that she harbors

the HLA-B51 allele.

Page 50: commentary case 5

DiscussionBehcet’s disease is common in the MiddleEast, with an incidence of 0.58 per 100 000population and a prevalence in Turkey of 420per 100 000 population. In the Westernhemisphere the exact incidence is less certainbut is estimated to be 0.24 per 100 000population and with a prevalence between0.12 and 7.5 per 100 000 population .

Page 51: commentary case 5

The onset usually occurs in the third decadeof life with an equal sex predilection(although a male preponderance in Turkeyhas been described) .

Page 52: commentary case 5

Central to the pathogenesis of Behcet’sdisease is an autoimmune vasculitis possiblyinduced by microbial pathogens in geneticallysusceptible individuals such as those with theHLA-B51 gene .

Page 53: commentary case 5

Increased expression of severalproinflammatory cytokines seems to beresponsible for the enhanced inflammatoryreaction in patients with Behcet’s.Specifically, high serum levels of IL-6 and IL-8have been found during active phases of thedisease .

Page 54: commentary case 5

Polymorphisms in the promoter region of thetumor necrosis factor gene (located in thevicinity of the HLA-B locus) and in theendothelial nitric oxide synthase gene arealso thought to play a role . While bloodvessels of all sizes can be involved, thedisease tends to mainly involve small veins.

Page 55: commentary case 5

Clinically, patients typically present withrecurrent mouth ulcers that can be severe,involving the soft palate and oropharynx andcausing difficulty eating, swallowing, andspeaking .

Page 56: commentary case 5

Genital ulceration is the second mostcommon manifestation of Behcet’s disease,developing in over half of patients .

Ocular disease is seen in 30–70% of patientsand usually begins after the mouth ulcers,but in 20% of patients these may be thepresenting feature .

Page 57: commentary case 5

The most common ocular finding isinflammation of the anterior uvea and thevascular middle layer of the eye. In additionto anterior uveitis, patients can present witha broad range of ophthalmologic conditions,including posterior uveitis (chorioretinitis),retinal vasculitis, and retinal detachment .

Page 58: commentary case 5

Neurological manifestations, when theyoccur, tend to develop late, with averagetime between onset of the disease andneurological symptoms of about 6 years .

Page 59: commentary case 5

In neuro-Behcet’s disease there typically isdirect involvement of the brain, usually in theform of a meningoencephalitis with anintense inflammatory infiltration oflymphocytes, eosinophils, and macrophages,and areas of necrosis and apoptotic neuronalloss .

Page 60: commentary case 5

In the non-parenchymal form, vascularcomplications involving thrombosis withinlarge veins and occasionally arteries occur, aswell as vasculitis that more often involvessmall veins . In some cases, an obliterativeendarteritis of the vasa nervorum can resultin focal vascular dilatation and aneurysmformation .

Page 61: commentary case 5

The structures within the brainstem,thalamus, basal ganglia, and white matter areall affected to varying degrees. In chroniccases, there can be striking atrophy ofbrainstem structures seen on MRI . Thisexplains why patients often developbrainstem syndromes, hemiparesis, andataxia .

Page 62: commentary case 5

Headache is also common, both migraine andtension type . The course may be relapsing-remitting initially followed by a secondaryprogressive phase, and occasionally aprimary progressive course is seen from thebeginning .

Page 63: commentary case 5

Our case nevertheless is remarkable inseveral ways.

Page 64: commentary case 5

First, almost all patients with Behcet’sdisease develop recurrent oral ulcerations. Soconsistent is this finding that it is aprerequisite for the diagnosis according tothe International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease. Our patient did have an oral ulceration, butthis came very late in the course and onlyafter her other neurological symptomsappeared.

Page 65: commentary case 5

Second, our patient did not have anyevidence of genital ulcerations, skin lesionsor skin pathergy, or a hyper-reactivity to non-specific physical insults such as a pinprick.Each of these findings generally occurs in 50–60% of patients, although pathergy may beless frequent in patients from the Westernhemisphere .

Page 66: commentary case 5

Third, uveitis is the most frequent ocularmanifestation of Behcet’s disease. Whileretinal detachment has been well described,it is certainly uncommon.

Page 67: commentary case 5

Fourth, neuro-Behcet’s disease is rare,occurring in 10–20% of patients with Behcet’sdisease. Typically this develops several yearsafter the diagnosis of Behcet’s. To have apatient present with neurological symptomsis very rare.

Page 68: commentary case 5

Fifth, the most common presentation ofneuro-Behcet’s disease ismeningoencephalitis followed by venousthrombosis. While venulitis is typical forBehcet’s disease, it is still uncommon.

Page 69: commentary case 5

Sixth and finally, symptoms attributable tobrainstem involvement have been wellreported in patients with Behcet’s disease.

Page 70: commentary case 5
Page 71: commentary case 5

A Case of Neuro-Behcet’s Disease Presenting With

Central Neurogenic Hyperventilation

Page 72: commentary case 5

Behcet disaese

Page 73: commentary case 5
Page 74: commentary case 5

New international criteria (new ICBD)(London 2010)

Oral aphthae 2

Skin lesions (PF, EN) 1

Vascular lesions 1

Genital aphthae 2

Eye lesions 2

CNS lesions 1

Pathergy test 1

>= 4 score: sensitivity: 94%, specificity: 90.5%

Page 75: commentary case 5

Frequency of Clinical Manifestations of Behçet Disease

Feature Frequency (%)

Oral Lesions 100

Genital Lesions 75

Skin Lesions 60-90

Ocular Manifestations 50

Arthritis 50

Gastrointestinal Lesions 25

Thrombophlebitis 20

Central Nervous System 10-20

Epididymitis 5

Page 76: commentary case 5

Consensus classification of neuro-Behcet’s disease

• Parenchymal

• Multifocal/diffuse

• Brainstem

• Spinal cord

• Cerebral

• Asymptomatic (silent)

• Optic neuropathy

Page 77: commentary case 5

• Non-parenchymal

• Cerebral venous thrombosis: intracranial hypertension

• Intracranial aneurysm

• Cervical extracranial aneurysm/dissection

• Acute meningeal syndrome

Page 78: commentary case 5

• Peripheral nervous system (relation to BD uncertain)

• Peripheral neuropathy and mononeuritismultiplex

• Myopathy and myositis

Mixed parenchymal and non-parenchymaldisease

Page 79: commentary case 5

International consensus recommendation (ICR) criteria for NBD diagnosis(2014)

Definite NBD meeting all of the following three criteria

1. Satisfy the ISGa criteria for BD2. Neurological syndromeb (with objective neurological signs) recognised to be caused by BD and supported by relevant and characteristiccabnormalities seen on either or both:a. Neuroimagingb. CSF3. No better explanation for the neurological findings

Page 80: commentary case 5

Probable NBD meeting one of the following two criteria in

the absence of a better explanation for the neurological findings:1. Neurological syndrome as in definite NBD, with systemic BD features but not satisfying the ISG criteria2. A non-characteristic neurological syndrome occurring in the context of ISG criteria-supported BD

A -ISG International Study Group Criteria 1990 or any other accepted current or future criteriaB- The recognised syndromes and the ^characteristic findings on investigations are described in Table 4 and in the text

Page 81: commentary case 5

Primary neurological involvement (neurological

involvement directly related to BS)

Headache (migraine-like, non-structural)

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (extra-axial NBS)

Central nervous system involvement (intra-axial NBS)

Neuro-psycho-Behçet's syndrome

Peripheral nervous system involvement

Subclinical NBS

Page 82: commentary case 5

• Secondary neurological involvement

(neurological involvement

• indirectly related to BS)• Depression and headache

• Neurological complications secondary to systemic

involvement of BS (i.e., cerebral emboli from

cardiac complications of BS,

• Increased intracranial pressure secondary to

superior vena cava syndrome)

Page 83: commentary case 5

Neurologic complications related to BS

treatments (i.e., CNSneurotoxicity with cyclosporine;

peripheral neuropathy secondary to thalidomide or

colchicine)

Coincidental – unrelated (non-BS) neurological

involvement

Primary headaches and any other coincidental

neurological problem

Page 84: commentary case 5