DC01\GEHAS\516422.11

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES113th Congress Disclosure Form

As required by and provided for in House Rule XI, clause 2(g) andthe Rules of the Committee on Natural Resources

The Department of the Interior’s proposal to allow a Categorical Exclusion under the NationalEnvironmental Policy Act (NEPA) for adding species to the Lacey Act’s list of injurious wildlife

Friday, September 20, 2013

For Individuals:

1. Name:

2. Address:

3. Email Address:

4. Phone Number:

* * * * *

For Witnesses Representing Organizations:

1. Name: Shaun M. Gehan

2. Name of Organization(s) You are Representing at the Hearing: United Association of ReptileKeepers

3. Business Address: 3050 K Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20007

4. Business Email Address: sgehan@kelleydrye.com

5. Business Phone Number: (202) 342-8469

DC01\GEHAS\516422.12

For all Witnesses

Mr. Shaun Gehan, on behalf of the United States Association of Reptile KeepersThe Department of the Interior’s proposal to allow a Categorical Exclusion under the NationalEnvironmental Policy Act (NEPA) for adding species to the Lacey Act’s list of injurious wildlife

Friday, September 20, 2013

a. Any training or educational certificates, diplomas or degrees or other educational experiences that arerelevant to your qualifications to testify on or knowledge of the subject matter of the hearing.

J.D.; Masters of Public Policy

b. Any professional licenses, certifications, or affiliations held that are relevant to your qualifications to testifyon or knowledge of the subject matter of the hearing.

Admitted to the bars of D.C., Maine, and Massachusetts (inactive) and bars of several Federal District Courtsand Courts of Appeals

c. Any employment, occupation, ownership in a firm or business, or work-related experiences that relate toyour qualifications to testify on or knowledge of the subject matter of the hearing.

Employed at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as an attorney

d. Any federal grants or contracts (including subgrants or subcontracts) from the Department of Interior thatyou have received in the current year and previous four years, including the source and the amount of eachgrant or contract.

No

e. A list of all lawsuits or petitions filed by you against the federal government in the current year and theprevious four years, giving the name of the lawsuit or petition, the subject matter of the lawsuit or petition,and the federal statutes under which the lawsuits or petitions were filed.

See attached

f. A list of all federal lawsuits filed against you by the federal government in the current year and the previousfour years, giving the name of the lawsuit, the subject matter of the lawsuit, and the federal statutes underwhich the lawsuits were filed.

None

g. Any other information you wish to convey that might aid the Members of the Committee to betterunderstand the context of your testimony.

I have extensive experience in relevant areas of law and have worked with USARK on the Lacey Act issuesdiscussed in my testimony for several years.

DC01\GEHAS\516422.13

Witnesses Representing Organizations

Mr. Shaun Gehan, on behalf of the United States Association of Reptile KeepersThe Department of the Interior’s proposal to allow a Categorical Exclusion under the NationalEnvironmental Policy Act (NEPA) for adding species to the Lacey Act’s list of injurious wildlife

Friday, September 20, 2013

h. Any offices, elected positions, or representational capacity held in the organization(s) on whose behalf youare testifying.

No

i. Any federal grants or contracts (including subgrants or subcontracts) from the Department of Interior thatwere received in the current year and previous four years by the organization(s) you represent at this hearing,including the source and amount of each grant or contract for each of the organization(s).

No

j. A list of all lawsuits or petitions filed by the organization(s) you represent at the hearing against the federalgovernment in the current year and the previous four years, giving the name of the lawsuit or petition, thesubject matter of the lawsuit or petition, and the federal statutes under which the lawsuits or petitions werefiled for each of the organization(s).

None

k. A list of all federal lawsuits filed against the organization(s) you represent at the hearing by the federalgovernment in the current year and the previous four years, giving the name of the lawsuit, the subject matterof the lawsuit, and the federal statutes under which the lawsuits were filed.

None

l. For tax-exempt organizations and non-profit organizations, copies of the three most recent public IRS Form990s (including Form 990-PF, Form 990-N, and Form 990-EZ) for each of the organization(s) you representat the hearing (not including any contributor names and addresses or any information withheld from publicinspection by the Secretary of the Treasury under 26 U.S.C. 6104)).

Attached

DC01\GEHAS\516422.14

Attachment

1. Alliance For Safe, Efficient and Competitive Truck Transportation, et al. v. Federal MotorCarrier Safety Administration, et al., Civ. No. 12-1305 (D.C. Cir.)

Petitioners have challenged a rule relating to the issuance of a rule relating to determinations ofthe fitness of a motor carrier to operate in interstate commerce. This case has been argued andsubmitted for a decision.

2. King’s Seafood Inc., et al. v. The Honorable John E. Bryson, Civ. No. 1:12-cv-00592-CKK(D.D.C.)

Challenge to annual catch limits established for the South Atlantic wreckfish fishery. The caseis currently stayed as the parties seek a non-judicial settlement.

3. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial andService Workers International Union, et al., v. Federal Highway Administration, et al., Civ.No. 1:13-cv-01301-EGS (D.D.C.)

Plaintiffs are challenging a rule issued by the Department of Transportation relating to the BuyAmerica program for steel components used in federally-funded highway projects. The casewas recently transferred from the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuitto the District Court.

4. Martha’s Vineyard / Dukes County Fishermen’s Association, et al. v. Salazar, et al. and CapeWind Associates, LLC (Intervenor), Civ. No. 1:10-cv-01067-RBW-DAR (D.D.C.)

Involved a challenge to a decision by the Secretary of Interior with respect approvals relatingto the Cape Wind offshore energy project. Our client, MVDCFA, have settled our claims withthe government and the defendant-intervenors.