commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    1/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 1/!

    CHAPTER 3

    DELTA MODULATION

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    2/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 2/!

    Outline

    " 3.12 Delta Modulation

    Delta Sigma Modulation

    " 3.13 #inear $rediction" 3.1 Di%%erential $ulse Code Modulation

    " 3.1! &dapti'e Di%%erential $ulse Code

    Modulation

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    3/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 3/!

    3.12 Delta Modulation

    " Definition:Delta Modulation is a techni(ue)hich pro'ides a staircase appro*imation

    to an o'er+sampled 'ersion o% the message

    signal ,analog input-.

    " sampling is at a rate higher than the y(uist

    rate aims at increasing the correlation

    et)een adacent samples simpli%ies

    (uantiing o% the encoded signal

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    4/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu /!

    Illustration of the delta modulation process

    4igure 3.22

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    5/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu !/!

    Principle Operation

    " message signal is o'er+sampled

    " di%%erence et)een the input and the

    appro*imation is (uantied in t)o le'els + 5/+6" these le'els correspond to positi'e/negati'e

    di%%erences

    " pro'ided signal does not change very rapidlythe appro*imation remains )ithin 5/+6

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    6/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 7/!

    Assumptions and model

    8e assume that:

    " m(t)denotes the input message signal

    " m(,t- denotes the staircase appro*imation" m[n] = m(nTs), n = +/-1, +/-2 denotes a

    sample o% the signal m(t)at timet=nTs9 )here

    Sis the sampling period" then

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    7/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu ;/!

    " )e can e*press the asic principles o% the delta

    modulation in a mathematical %orm as %ollo):

    < = < = < 1= ,3.!2-

    e n m n m n

    = sgn, < =- ,3.!3-e e n=

    < = < 1= < = ,3.!-

    m n m n e n= +

    error signal

    (uantied

    out ut

    (uantied

    error signal

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    8/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu >/!

    Pros and cons

    " Main ad'antage simplicity

    " Sampled 'ersion o% the message is applied to a

    modulator ,comparator9 (uantier9accumulator-

    " delay in accumulator is ?unit delay@ A one

    sample period ,+1-

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    9/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu B/!

    Figure 3.23

    DM system.

    a! Transmitter.

    b! "ecei#er.

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    10/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 10/!

    " (uantier includes a hard+

    limiter )ith an input+output

    relation a scaled 'ersion o%the signum %unction

    " accumulator produces the

    appro*imation m[n] ,%inal

    result- at each step yadding either 56 or 6

    " A tracking input samples y

    one step at a time-!!.3,

    =/!

    Figure 3.28

    DP'M system.

    a! Transmitter.

    b! "ecei#er.

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    29/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 2B/!

    Details(

    " Ilock scheme is 'ery similar to DM

    " (uantier input

    H< = < = < = ,3.;-e n m n m n=

    < = < = < = ,3.;!-e n e n n= +

    H< = < = < = ,3.;7-

    m n m n e n= +

    " (uantier output may e e*pressed as:

    " prediction %ilter output may e e*pressed as:

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    30/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 30/!

    H< = < = < = < = ,3.;;-m n m n e n n= + +

    % )e sustitute 3.;! into 3.;7 )e get:

    sum is e(ual to input

    sample

    < = < = < = ,3.;>-m n m n n= +

    uantied input o% the

    prediction %ilter +

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    31/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 31/!

    Details cont5d

    " m[n]is the (uantied 'ersion o% the input sample m[n]

    " so9 irrespecti'e o% the properties o% the prediction %ilter the(uantied sample m[n] at the prediction %ilter input di%%ers

    %rom the original sample m[n])ith the (uantiation error[n].

    " % the prediction %ilter is good9 the variance of the predictionerrore[n])ill e smaller than the variance ofm[n]

    " his means that i% )e make a 'ery good prediction %ilter,adust the numer o% le'els- it )ill e possile to produce aquantization error with a smaller variance than if the inputsample m[n]is quantized directly as in standard $CM

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    32/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 32/!

    "ecei#er side

    " decoder constructs the (uantied error signal

    " (uantied 'ersion o% the input is reco'ered yusing the same prediction %ilter as at the t*

    " i% there is no channel noise encoded input tothe decoder is identical to the transmitteroutput

    " then the recei'er output )ill e e(ual to m[n],di%%ers %rom m[n]y [n] caused y(uantiing the prediction error e[n]-

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    33/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 33/!

    'omparison

    " D$CM and DM

    D$CM includes DM as a special case

    Similarities

    " suect to slope+o'erhead and (uantiation error Di%%erences

    " DM uses a 1+it (uantier

    " DM uses a single delay element ,ero prediction order-

    " D$CM and $CMoth DM and D$CM use %eedack )hile $CM does not

    all suect to (uantiation error

    h l d l i

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    34/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 3/!

    Processin) &ain

    " Eutput signal+to+noise

    ratio ,SRE-" JM2 'ariance o% m

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    35/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 3!/!

    " he processing gain Kp)hen greater than unity

    represents the signal+to+noise ratio that is due to thedi%%erential (uantiation scheme.

    " 4or a gi'en input message signal JMis %i*ed9 so the

    smaller the JGthe greater the Kp.

    " his is the design oecti'e o% the prediction %ilter" 4or 'oice signals optimal main ad'antage o% D$CM

    o'er $CM is /n +11 dI

    " &d'antage e*pressed in terms o% it rate ,its-

    1 it A7 dI o% (uantiation noise ,ale 3.3!9 p 1B>- So %or %i*ed SR9 sampling rate > kL DC$M pro'ides

    sa'ing o% >+17 k/s ,1 +2 its per sample- $CM

    Ch 3 D l M d l i

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    36/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 37/!

    Outline

    " 3.12 Delta Modulation

    Delta Sigma Modulation

    " 3.13 #inear $rediction" 3.1 Di%%erential $ulse Code Modulation

    " 3.1 da$ti'e Die%ential *ulse &ode

    Modulation

    Ch t 3 D lt M d l ti

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    37/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 3;/!

    3.16 Adapti#e Di,,erential P'M

    " $CM %or speech coding o% 7 k/s re(uires highchannel and)idth

    " some applications ,secure transmission o'er radio

    channel lo) capacity-" re(uires speech coding at lo) it rates ut preser'ing

    acceptale %idelity ,not 7 k/s $CM ut 329 179 >etc-

    " possile using special coders that utilie statisticalcharacteristics o% speech signals and properties o%hearing

    Ch t 3 D lt M d l ti

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    38/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 3>/!

    Desi)n O47ecti#es

    " 1. Remo'e redundancies %rom speech signals

    " 2. &ssign a'ailale its to encode non+redundant parts

    o% speech signal in an e%%icient )ay

    " Standard $CM is at 7 k/s can e reduced to 329179 > or e'en k/s

    " $rice A proportionally increased comple*ity

    4or same speech (uality ut Lal% the it rate +Computational comple*ity is an order o% magnitude higher

    Ch t 3 D lt M d l ti

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    39/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 3B/!

    ADP'M principles

    " &llo)s encoding o% speech at 32 k/s re(uires its per

    sample

    " Fses ada$ti'e uantiationand ada$ti'e $%edi4tion

    adapti'e (uantiation uses a time+'arying step 63-Mn n =

    Ch t 3 D lt M d l ti

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    40/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 0/!

    " )o possiilities:

    adapti'e (uantiation )ith %or)ard estimation

    ,&4- uses un(uantied samples o% the input

    signal to deri'e %or)ard estimates o% 5M[n]6re(uires a u%%er to store samples %or a certain

    learning period incurs delay ,N 17 ms %or speech-

    adapti'e (uantiation )ith ack)ard estimation,&I- uses samples o% the (uantier output to

    deri'e ack)ards estimates o% 5M[n]

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    41/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 1/!

    " &dapti'e prediction in &D$CM

    adapti'e prediction )ith %or)ard estimation,&$4- uses un(unatied samples o% the input

    signal to calculate prediction coe%%icients

    disad'antages similar to &4

    adapti'e prediction )ith ack)ard estimation

    ,&$I- uses samples o% the (uantier output and

    the prediction error to compute predictor

    coe%%icients logic %or adapti'e prediction algorithm %or updating predictor coe%%icients

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    42/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 2/!

    Figure 3.29

    Adapti#e 8uanti-ation 0it% 4ac*0ard estimation

    A9+!.

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    43/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu 3/!

    Adapti#e prediction 0it% 4ac*0ard estimation AP+!.

    Figure 3.30

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

  • 7/23/2019 commsys-2-2012-3 (1)

    44/44

    Chapter 3: Delta Modulation

    'onclusion(

    " $CM at 7 k/s and &D$CM at 32 k/s are

    internationally accepted standards %or 'oice

    coding and decoding.