1
Communication Across Boundaries: Sharing Bioregional Knowledge Via Pathways Dened by Administrative Region Introduction Increases in invasive annual grasses combined with changing re paerns in the Great Basin are having detrimental eects on sagebrush ecosystems throughout this region. As researchers seek ways to understand these problems and improve ecosystem health and funcon, communicaon must improve among sciensts, land managers, private landowners and other stakeholders. Sharing bioregionally specic knowledge to inform management acvies across mulple agencies can be challenging. Communicaon networks within government agencies are organized within administravely dened regions that vary widely. Bioregions encompass a mosaic of land ownerships that include mulple agency jurisdicons as well as private land. Individuals conducng science delivery must strive to coordinate the ow of informaon among various groups with dierent objecves while maintaining the integrity of that informaon. The Sagebrush Steppe Treatment Evaluaon Project (SageSTEP) is a long-term collaborave research project evaluang methods of sagebrush community restoraon in the Great Basin bioregion. SageSTEP is a collaboraon among sciensts and managers from ve universies, six federal agencies and one non-prot organizaon in six states in the Great Basin. This poster presents SageSTEP as an example of the geographic challenges of sharing research informaon within a region where land management, ownership, and interest is compartmentalized in a variety of ways. We use systems modeling to demonstrate our eorts to share science-based informaon to improve land management and ulmately the health of sagebrush ecosystems in the Great Basin. Discussion SageSTEP focuses on the Great Basin, but our study employs a biological region that stretches outside the geophysical region. Within the study area, land is divided by various administrave and ownership boundaries (see maps). In addion, collaborang organizaons and individuals have a diversity of goals and needs for land management and research. The goal of our outreach program is to eecvely communicate research results to improve land management decision-making. In order to work toward eecve communicaon, we can idenfy leverage points, which Senge (1990) describes as “points where acons and changes in structures can lead to signicant, enduring improvements.” We have found that our most eecve leverage points involve parcipatory and interacve methods of communicaon. Previous research shows that interacve communicaons, as opposed to unidireconal methods, are more eecve for adult problem-centered learning (Toman et al. 2006). Youngblood et al. (2007) found that conferences and technical workshops were valuable science delivery venues because they provide opportunies for networking and interacon. SageSTEP has employed parcipatory methods in which the end-users of research results (primarily public land managers) are involved throughout the process of developing the research and evaluang outreach products as they are created. We use interacve methods of communicaon, such as workshops, oce visits and eld trips, whenever possible to increase parcipaon and eecveness of informaon-sharing. We strive to facilitate collaboraon of individuals from a diversity of organizaons and locaons, bringing together researchers and land managers from various agencies including (but not limited to) the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), USDA Forest Service, USDA Natural Resources Conservaon Service (NRCS), state and local organizaons, universies throughout the study region, and administrators at the state, regional and naonal levels. As these individuals share informaon and work together on common problems, they can look outside of the geographic boundaries that they normally work in. Addionally, Resilience Theory suggests that regular scienst-manager- stakeholder interacon, preferably in the eld, ghtens “feedbacks” and allows managers to respond more quickly to changes on the ground (Walker and Salt 2006). Oen individuals limit their thinking to the geographic boundaries in which they work or the discipline that they study or the parcular resource that they are managing for. Conversely, we constantly encourage holisc, landscape-scale thinking. Wondolleck and Yaee (2000) state that collaborave planning groups create more eecve approaches to problems by focusing on a situaon in a holisc way, including geographic integraon of resource management. Because SageSTEP is a regional collaborave project, one of our science delivery goals is to encourage managers in various organizaons to “see the forest and the trees”, or in our case the sagebrush and the rangeland—and the wildlife and the hydrologic cycle and the soils and adjacent land—and the way all of these pieces funcon together. A Work in Progress While we have idened several methods for eecvely communicang scienc informaon across a variety of administrave boundaries, the implementaon of these acvies is ongoing process. Communicaon is not a nite acvity, but a process we connually seek to improve as we collaborate with others to work toward the common goal of improving Great Basin ecosystems. As we enter the long-term monitoring phase of the SageSTEP research, we look forward to connuing to improve our outreach methods to most eecvely meet our goals, as well as collaborang with other science delivery programs to maximize our eorts. Some potenal future acvies for SageSTEP science delivery: Evaluaon of science delivery products and events Online survey of product-users Feedback forms at the end of workshops and meengs Stascal analysis of website usage Informal communicaons with managers Gaining input from primary audiences about what future outreach products are needed Incorporang research results into informaon sources already being used managers E.g. fuels treatment supplement for Ecological Site Descripons (ESDs) Second edion of popular eld guides • Collaborang with other similar eorts Great Basin Science Delivery Project Connued regular interac ons with managers Field tours, oce visits and workshops For more information... Summer Olsen SageSTEP Outreach Coordinator Utah State University 435-797-8455 [email protected] www.sagestep.org Summer Olsen and Mark Brunson, Utah State University, Department of Environment and Society References The Great Basin is a geophysical region comprised largely of two vegetaon cover types BLM organized by district within states; USDA FS organized by forest within regions SageSTEP study sites are organized by orisc region NRCS uses Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA) to address resource issues Listening: Participatory Input about information needs Formal evaluation of science delivery Review of outreach pubs before printing Leverage Point Researchers methods allow endͲ users to be part of planning process needs Informal communications printing Land Managers Other InfoͲUsers Attending events planned by other orgs. Leverage Point Sharing information StateͲ and i ifi Info incorporated into sources already used Encouraging Holistic Thinking Products based on vegetation NRCS regionͲspecific info/meetings vegetation type Forest Service Collaboration: Bringing together Leverage Point BLM Service a diversity of individuals with common goals Key Leverage Points*: Parcipatory Processes - Allowing end-users of research results to be part of the planning process Land managers throughout study region involved in creaon of inial project proposal and helped plan and implement study design Researchers and managers meet together regularly to discuss progress of the project Managers review outreach publicaons before they are printed Collaboraon – Bringing together individuals from a variety of organizaons to share ideas, needs, informaon Local and regional workshops, conference calls, parcipaon in related projects Encouraging a Holisc Perspecve Muldisciplinary presentaons and products Collaboraon on publicaons and syntheses *Leverage Points: points where acons and changes in structures can lead to signicant, enduring improvements (Senge 1999) SageSTEP eld guides use orisc boundaries to encourage ecosystem management and can be used by anyone working within those boundaries. Manager workshops and eld tours are organized by state to encourage parcipaon of individuals from a variety of organizaon. Chambers, J.C., N. Devoe, and A. Evenden, editors. 2008. Collaborave management and research in the Great Basin—examining the issues and developing a framework for acon. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-204. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Staon. 66p. Senge, P.M. 1990. The Fih Discipline: The Art and Pracce of the Learning Organizaon. Doubleday, New York, NY. Toman, E., B. Shindler and M. Brunson. 2006. Fire and fuel management communicaon strategies: cizen evaluaons of agency outreach acvies. Society and Natural Resources 19:321-336. Walker, B. and D. Salt. 2006. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Washington, DC, Island Press. 174p. Wondolleck, J.M. and S.L. Yaee. 2000. Making Collaboraon Work: Lessons from Innovaon in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, DC. Youngblood, A., H. Bigler-Cole, C.J. Feg, C. Fiedler, E.E. Knapp, J.F. Lehmkuhl, K.W. Outcalt, C.N. Skinner, S.L. Stephens and T.A. Waldrop. 2007. Making Fire and Fire Surrogate Science Available: A Summary of Regional Workshops with Clients. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNRS-GTR-727. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacic Northwest Research Staon. 59p.

Communication Across Boundaries: Sharing Bioregional ... · Communication Across Boundaries: Sharing Bioregional Knowledge Via Pathways Defi ned by Administrative Region Introduction

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Communication Across Boundaries: Sharing Bioregional ... · Communication Across Boundaries: Sharing Bioregional Knowledge Via Pathways Defi ned by Administrative Region Introduction

Communication Across Boundaries: Sharing Bioregional Knowledge Via Pathways Defi ned by Administrative Region

IntroductionIncreases in invasive annual grasses combined with changing fi re patt erns in the Great Basin are having detrimental eff ects on sagebrush ecosystems throughout this region. As researchers seek ways to understand these problems and improve ecosystem health and functi on, communicati on must improve among scienti sts, land managers, private landowners and other stakeholders. Sharing bioregionally specifi c knowledge to inform management acti viti es across multi ple agencies can be challenging. Communicati on networks within government agencies are organized within administrati vely defi ned regions that vary widely. Bioregions encompass a mosaic of land ownerships that include multi ple agency jurisdicti ons as well as private land. Individuals conducti ng science delivery must strive to coordinate the fl ow of informati on among various groups with diff erent objecti ves while maintaining the integrity of that informati on.

The Sagebrush Steppe Treatment Evaluati on Project (SageSTEP) is a long-term collaborati ve research project evaluati ng methods of sagebrush community restorati on in the Great Basin bioregion. SageSTEP is a collaborati on among scienti sts and managers from fi ve universiti es, six federal agencies and one non-profi t organizati on in six states in the Great Basin. This poster presents SageSTEP as an example of the geographic challenges of sharing research informati on within a region where land management, ownership, and interest is compartmentalized in a variety of ways. We use systems modeling to demonstrate our eff orts to share science-based informati on to improve land management and ulti mately the health of sagebrush ecosystems in the Great Basin.

DiscussionSageSTEP focuses on the Great Basin, but our study employs a biological region that stretches outside the geophysical region. Within the study area, land is divided by various administrati ve and ownership boundaries (see maps). In additi on, collaborati ng organizati ons and individuals have a diversity of goals and needs for land management and research. The goal of our outreach program is to eff ecti vely communicate research results to improve land management decision-making. In order to work toward eff ecti ve communicati on, we can identi fy leverage points, which Senge (1990) describes as “points where acti ons and changes in structures can lead to signifi cant, enduring improvements.”

We have found that our most eff ecti ve leverage points involve parti cipatory and interacti ve methods of communicati on. Previous research shows that interacti ve communicati ons, as opposed to unidirecti onal methods, are more eff ecti ve for adult problem-centered learning (Toman et al. 2006). Youngblood et al. (2007) found that conferences and technical workshops were valuable science delivery venues because they provide opportuniti es for networking and interacti on. SageSTEP has employed parti cipatory methods in which the end-users of research results (primarily public land managers) are involved throughout the process of developing the research and evaluati ng outreach products as they are created. We use interacti ve methods of communicati on, such as workshops, offi ce visits and fi eld trips, whenever possible to increase parti cipati on and eff ecti veness of informati on-sharing.

We strive to facilitate collaborati on of individuals from a diversity of organizati ons and locati ons, bringing together researchers and land managers from various agencies including (but not limited to) the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), USDA Forest Service, USDA Natural Resources Conservati on Service (NRCS), state and local organizati ons, universiti es throughout the study region, and administrators at the state, regional and nati onal levels. As these individuals share informati on and work together on common problems, they can look outside of the geographic boundaries that they normally work in. Additi onally, Resilience Theory suggests that regular scienti st-manager-stakeholder interacti on, preferably in the fi eld, ti ghtens “feedbacks” and allows managers to respond more quickly to changes on the ground (Walker and Salt 2006).

Oft en individuals limit their thinking to the geographic boundaries in which they work or the discipline that they study or the parti cular resource that they are managing for. Conversely, we constantly encourage holisti c, landscape-scale thinking. Wondolleck and Yaff ee (2000) state that collaborati ve planning groups create more eff ecti ve approaches to problems by focusing on a situati on in a holisti c way, including geographic integrati on of resource management. Because SageSTEP is a regional collaborati ve project, one of our science delivery goals is to encourage managers in various organizati ons to “see the forest and the trees”, or in our case the sagebrush and the rangeland—and the wildlife and the hydrologic cycle and the soils and adjacent land—and the way all of these pieces functi on together.

A Work in ProgressWhile we have identi fi ed several methods for eff ecti vely communicati ng scienti fi c informati on across a variety of administrati ve boundaries, the implementati on of these acti viti es is ongoing process. Communicati on is not a fi nite acti vity, but a process we conti nually seek to improve as we collaborate with others to work toward the common goal of improving Great Basin ecosystems. As we enter the long-term monitoring phase of the SageSTEP research, we look forward to conti nuing to improve our outreach methods to most eff ecti vely meet our goals, as well as collaborati ng with other science delivery programs to maximize our eff orts.

Some potenti al future acti viti es for SageSTEP science delivery:

Evaluati on of science delivery products and events• Online survey of product-usersFeedback forms at the end of workshops and meeti ngsStati sti cal analysis of website usageInformal communicati ons with managers

Gaining input from primary audiences about what future outreach • products are needed

Incorporati ng research results into informati on sources already • being used managers

E.g. fuels treatment supplement for Ecological Site Descripti ons (ESDs)Second editi on of popular fi eld guides

• Collaborati ng with other similar eff orts Great Basin Science Delivery Project

Conti nued regular interacti ons with managers • Field tours, offi ce visits and workshops

For more information...Summer OlsenSageSTEP Outreach CoordinatorUtah State [email protected]

Summer Olsen and Mark Brunson, Utah State University, Department of Environment and Society

References

The Great Basin is a geophysical region comprised largely of two vegetati on cover types

BLM organized by district within states; USDA FS organized by forest within regions

SageSTEP study sites are organized by fl oristi c region

NRCS uses Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA) to address resource issues

Listening:Participatory

Input aboutinformation

needs

Formalevaluation ofsciencedelivery

Review ofoutreachpubs beforeprinting

Leverage Point

Researchers

p ymethods allow endusers to be part ofplanning process

needs

Informalcommunications

printing

LandManagers

OtherInfo Users

Attendingevents plannedby other orgs.

Leverage Point

Sharinginformation

State andi ifi

Infoincorporatedinto sourcesalready used

EncouragingHolisticThinking Products

based onvegetation

NRCSregion specificinfo/meetings

vegetationtype

ForestService

Collaboration:Bringing together

Leverage Point

BLMServicea diversity of

individuals withcommon goals

Key Leverage Points*:Parti cipatory Processes - Allowing end-users of • research results to be part of the planning process

Land managers throughout study region involved in creati on of initi al project proposal and helped plan and implement study designResearchers and managers meet together regularly to discuss progress of the projectManagers review outreach publicati ons before they are printed

Collaborati on – Bringing together individuals from • a variety of organizati ons to share ideas, needs, informati on

Local and regional workshops, conference calls, parti cipati on in related projects

Encouraging a Holisti c Perspecti ve • Multi disciplinary presentati ons and productsCollaborati on on publicati ons and syntheses

*Leverage Points: points where acti ons and changes in structures can lead to signifi cant, enduring improvements (Senge 1999)

SageSTEP fi eld guides use fl oristi c boundaries to encourage ecosystem management and can be used by anyone working within those boundaries.

Manager workshops and fi eld tours are organized

by state to encourage parti cipati on of individuals

from a variety of organizati on.

Chambers, J.C., N. Devoe, and A. Evenden, editors. 2008. Collaborati ve management and research in the Great Basin—examining the issues and developing a framework for acti on. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-204. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Stati on. 66p.

Senge, P.M. 1990. The Fift h Discipline: The Art and Practi ce of the Learning Organizati on. Doubleday, New York, NY.

Toman, E., B. Shindler and M. Brunson. 2006. Fire and fuel management communicati on strategies: citi zen evaluati ons of agency outreach acti viti es. Society and Natural Resources 19:321-336.

Walker, B. and D. Salt. 2006. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Washington, DC, Island Press. 174p.

Wondolleck, J.M. and S.L. Yaff ee. 2000. Making Collaborati on Work: Lessons from Innovati on in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Youngblood, A., H. Bigler-Cole, C.J. Fetti g, C. Fiedler, E.E. Knapp, J.F. Lehmkuhl, K.W. Outcalt, C.N. Skinner, S.L. Stephens and T.A. Waldrop. 2007. Making Fire and Fire Surrogate Science Available: A Summary of Regional Workshops with Clients. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNRS-GTR-727. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacifi c Northwest Research Stati on. 59p.