117 NW Lafayette Avenue, Bend, Oregon 97703 | P.O. Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708-6005

(541) 388-6575 cdd@deschutes .org www.deschutes.org/cd

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners will hold a continued public hearing on April 1, 2020, at approximately 10:00 a.m. in the Barnes and Sawyer Rooms of the Deschutes Services Center, 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, to consider the proposal described below. The Board is particularly interested in hearing from impacted property owners of the six residential areas described below.

FILE NUMBER: 247-19-000265-PA

APPLICANT: Deschutes County Community Development Department

117 NW Lafayette Avenue

Bend, OR 97701

PROPOSAL: A proposal to establish eligibility Comprehensive Plan criteria for six

specific areas currently designated Exclusive Farm Use or Forest Use to

Nonprime Resource (NPR) Lands, defined in Oregon Administrative

Rules (OAR) 660-004-0005(3) as “Non Resource Lands.”

LOCATION: The six legacy residential areas are: Haner Park, Section 36 (Township

22, Range 10), Skyline Subdivision and Skyline Subdivision 1st Addition,

Squaw Creek Canyon Recreational Estates 1st Addition and Meadow

Crest Acres Subdivision.

STAFF CONTACT: Zechariah Heck, Associate Planner, zechh@deschutes.org, (541) 385-

1704

DOCUMENTS: Can be viewed and downloaded from: http://www.deschutes.org/npr.

STANDARDS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA

Title 22, Deschutes County Development Procedures Ordinance

Chapter 22.12 Legislative Procedures

Statewide Planning Goals

Oregon Administrative Rules

660-004 – Interpretation of Goal 2 Exceptions Process

660-006 – Forest Land

660-033 – Agricultural Land

Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan

Mailing Date:Wednesday, February 19, 2020

ALL INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR, BE HEARD, BE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, OR SEND WRITTEN SIGNED TESTIMONY. ALL WRITTEN REPLIES MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE OR SUBMITTED AT THE HEARING. ANY PARTY TO THE APPLICATION IS ENTITLED TO A CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL EVIDENTIARY HEARING OR TO HAVE THE RECORD LEFT OPEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22.24.140 OF THE DESCHUTES COUNTY CODE. Failure to raise an issue in person at the hearing or in writing precludes appeal by that person to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). Failure to provide statements of evidence sufficient to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to LUBA based on that issue.

Copies of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and

applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. Copies can be purchased for 25 cents per page. The

Planning Division is located in the Community Development Department Office at 117 NW Lafayette Avenue,

Bend, Oregon.

NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU

RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT MUST PROMPTLY BE FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.

Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This

event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation

possible, please call the ADA Coordinator at (541) 617-4747.

DOCUMENT SUBMISSION

Any person may submit written comments on a proposed land use action. Documents may be submitted to

our office in person, U.S. mail, or email.

In Person U.S. Mail

We accept all printed documents. Deschutes County Community Development

Planning Division, Attn: Zechariah Heck

P.O. Box 6005

Bend, OR 97708-6005

Email

Email submittals must comply with the following guidelines or otherwise must be submitted as a paper copy:

Submission is 20 pages or less

Documents can be printed in black and white only

Documents can be printed on 8.5” x 11” paper

Limitations

Deschutes County does not take responsibility for retrieving information from a website link or a

personal cloud storage service. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide the specific information

they wish to enter into the record. We will print the email which includes the link(s), however, we will

not retrieve any information on behalf of the submitter.

Deschutes County makes an effort to scan all submittals as soon as possible. Recognizing staff

availability and workload, there is often a delay between the submittal of a document to the record,

and when it is available online. For this reason, the official record is the file that resides in the

Community Development Department office. The electronic record online is not a substitute for the

official record.

To ensure your submission is entered into the correct land use record, please specify the land use file

number(s).

Failure to raise an issue in person at a hearing or in writing precludes appeal by that person to the Land Use

Board of Appeals (LUBA), and that failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision

maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to LUBA based on that issue.

Copies of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and

applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. Copies can be purchased for 25 cents per page.

Notice of the decision will be provided by a separate mailing. For more information or to request copies of

the findings and decision, contact the assigned planner.

NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU

RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT MUST PROMPTLY BE FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.

This Notice was mailed pursuant to Deschutes County Code Chapters 22.20 and 22.24.

Owner Agent Address CityStZip File No. Type

1,000 Friends of Oregon Mary Kyle McCurdy / Scott Hilgenberg 133 SW 2nd Ave, Suite 201 Portland, OR 97204 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ADAMS, JUDITH K & JOSEPH 175 W ST JAMES #807 SAN JOSE, CA 95110 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

AGOSTINI, MARK 1540 STANFORD DR GLENDALE, CA 91205 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ALAN E DAMON TRUST DAMON, ALAN E & LARA D TTEES 63242 PETERMAN LN BEND, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

AMBROSE, MELVIN ASHMAN JR 23405 NW MORELAND RD NORTH PLAINS, OR 97133 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ANDERSON, DAVID FRED ET AL 468 LAUREL AVE SAN ANSELMO, CA 94960 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ANDERSON, JARED RYAN 61610 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ANDERSON, SARA K & WARREN 53611 BOBWHITE CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ANDERSON, TONY G 43859 N 202ND ST E LANCASTER, CA 93535 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ARNEY, PAUL B & STACI D 61517 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

AUSEC, MICHAEL EUGENE & DEBRA KAY PO BOX 38 HUBBARD, OR 97032 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

AYRES, ROBERT B JR & TERRI L 31220 BERLIN RD LEBANON, OR 97355 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BAKER FAMILY TRUST BAKER, GEORGE TTEE 3365 SODA CANYON RD NAPA, CA 94558 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BAKER, GILBERT & BONNIE K 53615 WOODCHUCK DR LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BARNES, MICHAEL & KIM LESLIE 2099 NW 3RD AVE HILLSBORO, OR 97124 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Barnyt, David 3450 Butler Road Redmond, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BARTLETT,ELLARD A & FRANCES M 53603 BOBWHITE CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BAUMGARTNER, THOMAS D 19331 MEYERS RD OREGON CITY, OR 97045 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BENDER, STEPHEN B PO BOX 2723 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BERGSTROM LIVING TRUST BERGSTROM, DAVID F TTEE 70185 APPALOOSA DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BIDASOLO,MICHAEL 17505 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BIRD, CAROLYN DEE ET AL 1001 SE 15TH ST #111 BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BIRNBAUM REVOCABLE TRUST BIRNBAUM, WILLIAM S & WENDY J TTEES 17695 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BIRNBAUM REVOCABLE TRUST BIRNBAUM, WILLIAM S & WENDY J TTEES PO BOX 1570 SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Bishop, Thomas E. 63382 Fawn Lane Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BLAZEK FAMILY REV LIV TRUST BLAZEK,GREGORY S TTEE PO BOX 604 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BORTER,LARRY D & BONNIE L 38945 HWY 226 SCIO, OR 97374 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BOTTENSEK, ADAM & JOLIE 7123 MAPLE CREEK RD WESTLAKE, OR 97493 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BOURGERIE, JEFFERY R & STEPHANIE J 17555 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BRADFORD, RICHARD M & CINDI L 70225 SORRELL DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BRADLEY, ROBERT L & VICTORIA B 17670 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Brectenstein, Chris 20025 Rodeo Dr Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BROOKS-HUTTON, GEORGE 217 RAMONA AVE EL CERRITO, CA 94530 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Buchholz, James 4835 Noren Ave NE Keizer, OR 97303 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BUCHHOLZ, JAMES D ET AL 4835 NOREN AVE KEIZER, OR 97303 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BURGESS,JOHN C & SANDRA G PO BOX 456 SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BURKE,JIM C & BARBARA S PO BOX 1562 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

BZDILL, ROBERT JR 283 CLEAR CREEK RD BOISE, ID 83716 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CAIN, WILLIAM C & CINDY 01062 3850TH ST BLOOMINGDALE, MI 49026 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CALEEN, LARRY PO BOX 1093 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CALKINS, GLORIA B 1178 RIDGELEY DR CAMPBELL, CA 95008 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CAPEN, DAVID A & CECILIA L 70211 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CARAMAGNO, ANDREW P & MICHELLE M 70160 SORRELL DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CARAMELLA,RONALD & CARYN E 2571 NW EUSTON LN REDMOND, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CECIL,HAROLD O & HANFORD,MICHELLE L 16360 SKYLINERS RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CEDARGLEN LLC C/O BRENT CARLTON (A) 94550 DEADWOOD CREEK RD DEADWOOD, OR 97430 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CHAPMAN, ERICK JOHN & ELIZABETH C 277 PRAIRIEWOOD CT SAN JOSE, CA 95127 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CHODELSKI, JANICE 16390 SKYLINERS RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CICCHETTI, JAMES A & MARGARET C 9550 SW PINEHURST DR BEAVERTON, OR 97005 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

City of Bend Brian Rankin PO Box 431 Bend, OR 97709 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

City of La Pine Melissa Bethel PO Box 2460 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

City of Redmond Deborah McMahon 411 SW 9th St Redmond, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

City of Sisters Patrick Davenport PO Box 39 Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CLARK,HARRIET 61580 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CLICKETT, AARON & KARA 23432 BUTTERFIELD TRL BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CONDON, JOHN 61594 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

COOK, STEVEN 19764 ASTRO PL BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

COOMLER, RICHARD H 2995 WAYSIDE LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

COOPER,RANDY R & VERONICA A PO BOX 3239 #309 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

COPELAND, PHILLIP A & DEANNA L 37124 HILLS CREEK RD SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CRAIN,ROBERT F & ROBERTA L 61579 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Criss, Ed 53446 Brookie Way La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CUMMINGS, CARLOS D & JANICE L 61572 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CUMMINGS, CARLOS D & JANICE L 61576 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

CUMMINGS, CREED G & ASHLEY B 2211 NW 22ND ST REDMOND, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DANIEL ROGER MILLS 2004 TRUST, MILLS, DANIEL R TRUSTEE 70170 DOGGIE DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DANNA M MCNEESE TRUST MCNEESE, DANNA M TTEE PO BOX 6955 BEND, OR 97708 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DARLENE WAY LLC 1330 W SHERMAN ST LEBANON, OR 97355 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DEBRA D SCHMUNK REV TRUST SCHMUNK, DEBRA D TTEE 19600 NW PHILLIPS RD HILLSBORO, OR 97124 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DENNIS & JODY GRIFFIN JOINT TRUST GRIFFIN, DENNIS K & JODY G TTEES PO BOX 6844 BEND, OR 97708 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Dept. of Land Conservation and Development Attn: Jon Jinings & Scott Edelman 1011 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Deschutes County Ed Keith, County Forester PO Box 6005 Bend, OR 97708 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Deschutes County Todd Cleveland PO Box 6005 Bend, OR 97708 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Deschutes County Rural Fire Protection District #2 Gary Marshall 1212 SW Simpson Ave Bend, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DEWETTE, NICOLAAS W 3986 SW CONDOR AVE PORTLAND, OR 97201 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DIECKMANN, STEVEN 16206 HAWKS LAIR RD LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DIETZ, CHARLES H & ARLENE L 33632 MCKENZIE VIEW DR EUGENE, OR 97408 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DONOVAN, STEPHANIE SUZANNE 346 NW HUNTER PL BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DOUD,J MICHAEL & PATRICIA D PO BOX 1958 CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DOWSETT, MICHAEL D & DEBORAH L 70208 LONGHORN DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

DOZER, DAVID & MARY ANN 17755 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Eagle, Eva & Bowen, Bruce 17212 Pine Dr Sisters, OR 97709 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

EAKIN, JOHN & ALEX 115 S 2ND ST SELAH, WA 98942 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

EDWARDS, JAMES E PO BOX 613 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

EISENMAN, STEPHEN J & PATRICIA L 17576 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Elrod, Jan 64940 19th St Bend, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ENGEL, DENNIS & SHIRLEY 70235 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ENGWEILER-SMITH FAMILY TRUST ENGWEILER, GLENN ALLEN SR TTEE ET AL 17650 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Epling, Etta 68445 Nehalem Hwy N Vernonia, OR 97064 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

EPLING,D H & ETTA 68445 NEHALAM HWY VERNONIA, OR 97064 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Erard, Ben 64510 El Dorado Trails Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

EVANS, DANIEL J & WENDY R 19918 SW POWERS RD BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Evans, Ken PO Box 653 John Day, OR 97845 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

EVANS, KENNETH L & CLAUDIA L PO BOX 653 JOHN DAY, OR 97845 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

FARLEIGH, JAMES 61040 S QUEENS DR #16 BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Fischer, John 33 NW Franklin Ave, Suite 110 Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Fitzgerald, Daniel 1330 West Sherman Lebanon, OR 97355 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

FITZGERALD, DANIEL G & PATRICIA L 1330 W SHERMAN ST LEBANON, OR 97355 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

FREEMAN, JAMES L & KAREN E 17785 MT VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

FREEMAN, ROSS & KIM 7110 SE CAVALIER ST MILWAUKIE, OR 97267 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

FRIIS, KERRY & DANIEL 17383 SPUR DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Garner, Heath 16300 Hawks Lair Rd. La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GAST, KEVIN B 70325 CLUB RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GHAZANFAR ZARDINEJAD LIVING TRUST ZARDINEJAD, GHAZANFAR TTEE 19597 SW INGLIS DR BEAVERTON, OR 97007-6088 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Godard, Jack 67710 Lake Dr. Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Goldberg-Jaffe, Noah 20480 Cooley Road Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Goldner, Anne 1744 NW 12th St Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GOLDSPUR FARM LLC 63591 OB RILEY RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GONCE LIVING TRUST GONCE, WILLIAM TTEE 1034 NW BIRCH AVE REDMOND, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GONZALES, DONALD S & LAURIE D 70170 CAYUSE PL SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Gould, Nunzie 19845 JW Brown Road Bend, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GRACE, VINCENT E & JULIA J 17620 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GRAY, NATHAN & EUIJIN ESTHER 61558 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GRAY, NATHAN & EUIJIN ESTHER PO BOX 1450 BEND, OR 97709 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GREEN, PAUL E JR 16203 HAWKS LAIR RD LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GREENE, DENNIS & RHODA PO BOX 1467 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Greiner, Donald 16489 Charlotte Day Dr. La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

GRIFFITHS 2002 TRUST GRIFFITHS, JOAN M TTEE 2611 HUNTINGTON DR APTOS, CA 95003 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Gustafson, Karna COBA 1929 NW Rivermist Dr Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HAILEY, LONNIE C PO BOX 3239 #313 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HALLADEY,DELMAR L ETUX 82281 PARVIN RD DEXTER, OR 97431 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HAMILTON LIVING TRUST HAMILTON, H ROBERT TTEE ET AL 16318 SKYLINE DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HAMILTON, PHILIP S 16333 SKYLINE DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HANER PARK LLC 6525 CORVALLIS RD INDEPENDENCE, OR 97351 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Haner Park, LLC C/O Carol Yetter, Member 6525 Corvallis Rd Independence, OR 97351 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Hanner, Wayne PO Box 650 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HANSEN, CHARLES MARK ET AL 9879 BUENA VISTA RD INDEPENDENCE, OR 97351 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HARDIE, JONATHAN T ET AL 28195 S OGLESBY RD CANBY, OR 97013 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HARPER, TERRY MICHAEL ET AL PO BOX 344 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Hatfield, Mary PO Box 559 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HAYNIE, CURTIS 760 FRANKTON HOOD RIVER, OR 97031 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HENTHORNE,RONALD C & VIRGINIA LEA PO BOX 309 CRAWFORDSVILLE, OR 97336 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HEPLER, RICHARD LLOYD 4235 SE RAYMOND ST PORTLAND, OR 97206 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HICKEY, DAVID J & GAY M 17591 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HILBURN, JAMES & JEANINE 455 SE SID CT PRINEVILLE, OR 97754 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HILL, KEVIN L PO BOX 12561 SALEM, OR 97309 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Hirschberg, Brendon & Shannon 60590 Groff Rd Bend, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HOLLENBECK, ANNE & MARK PO BOX 1586 SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HOUCK, CLIFFORD & JAN K 1819 POMMEL CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HUGHES,ROBERT & CLARA PO BOX 1955 SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Humphreys, Chuck 14985 Remuda Road Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

HUNT, GREGORY D & CARLA JO 22115 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Hunt, Randy & Kenna 16205 Hawks Lair La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

IRA SERVICES TRUST COMPANY CFBO WILLIAM DEAN GONCE IRA PO BOX 7080 SAN CARLOS, CA 94070 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Central Oregon Landwatch Isbell, Rory / Macbeth, Carol 50 SW Bond St, Ste. 4 Bend, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Jacobs, Donald & JoAnn 60435 Tekampe Rd Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Jaros, Derek PO Box 1957 Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

JENCKS-ZAISS JOINT REV LIVING TRUST ZAISS, ERIC J & JENCKS, JODEL T TTEES 2076 DAVIS RD S SALEM, OR 97306 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

JOHN COOPER RAY TRUST RAY, JOHN C TTEE 3222 RIVER PLACE DR EUGENE, OR 97401 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

JOHNNY & BEVERLY RAMSEY REV TRUST RAMSEY, JOHNNY L & BEVERLY L TTEES 16443 W CHUPAROSA LN SURPRISE, AZ 85387 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

JOHNSON, JEFFREY D & KATHERINE J 70285 SORRELL DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

JOHNSON, MICHAEL G & PETRECE J 3043 NW WAPITI AVE SALEM, OR 97304-2300 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Johnson, Phillip PO Box 2365 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

JOHNSON, PHILLIP W & CHARLOTTE E PO BOX 2365 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

JOHNSON, TIA LYN & LOVERRO, JAMES PETER 15901 SW WINTERGREEN ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KAY, RICHARD W ET AL 1201 SE EVANS LOOP TROUTDALE, OR 97060 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Kay, Rick 1235 Mourning Dove Ct Redmond, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KENSAL E VANHOLDE TRUST VANHOLDE, KENSAL E TTEE 2800 NW 29TH #17 CORVALLIS, OR 97330 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KERN, MATTHEW S & MAGGIE C 61537 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KERSHAW LIVING TRUST KERSHAW, JAMES L TTEE ET AL 14512 NE 15TH ST VANCOUVER, WA 98684 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KINLEY FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST KINLEY, THOMAS LEE TTEE ET AL 70208 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KJOS, THOMAS K & LUCY E 2710 NE GREAT HORNED PL BEND, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KNIGHTS, DUANE A & SUSAN E 3489 YOLANDA AVE SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KNOPER, JANE A PO BOX 389 SCIO, OR 97374 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Kogler, Karl 15889 Davis Ave La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Kogler, Karl & Michele PO Box 3156 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KRAHN,PAUL W & WIGHTMAN,DARIA 61561 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

KRIEGLER, INGE H & WARD, MICHAEL B PO BOX 133 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LAIRD, BRIAN T 838 WOODLAND AVE MENLO PARK, CA 94025 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LAWRENCE, LINDA L & LUTZ, DONALD R 7701 78TH LOOP NW OLYMPIA, WA 98502 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Lay, Jeff 236643 Warthen Rd. Elmira, OR 97437 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LAY, JEFFREY A & KAREN M 23643 WARTHEN RD ELMIRA, OR 97437 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LEACH, DAVID C & RAE ANN 17675 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LEHRER,ROBERT & JUDY PO BOX 3239 PMB 311 LA PINE, OR 97739-3239 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LESLIE KATHRYN BAKER TRUST BAKER, LESLIE K TTEE 3222 RIVERPLACE DR EUGENE, OR 97401 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LIND, FREDERICK V JR 53616 BOBWHITE CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Lipscomb, Donna & Paul P.O. Box 579 Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LOCKE,DAVID S & KAREN S 756 ELLIS AVE LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LORENZ, BRAD 82860 BROOKHURST LN CRESWELL, OR 97426 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LORI E WESTIN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST WESTIN,LORI E TRUSTEE 17710 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LUCIANO, JOHN P & MACAULAY, JENNIFER L 16372 SKYLINERS RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LUNDBLAD, ROY W ET AL 1444 VERA DR SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

LYNDA M DURAND REVOCABLE TRUST DURAND, LYNDA M TTEE 70175 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Mackey, Steve 90956 S. Skinner Coburg, OR 97408 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MACKEY, STEVEN W & NANCY S 90956 S SKINNER COBURG, OR 97408 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MADDOX, JAMES E ET AL 4098 FORESTVIEW AVE CONCORD, CA 94521 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MADDOX, JEFFREY ET AL 1001 SE 15TH ST #48 BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MANDLIN, ANGELA LEE & KEVIN 360 NW VERMONT PL #100 BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MANNING, ROBERT C & QUINLAN, JOHANNAH 53605 BOBWHITE CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MARTIN, PETER & CANDACE 61488 ORION DR BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MARY F KENNEY TRUST KENNEY, MARY F TTEE PO BOX 2129 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MATTHEWS, SHARON KAY 70180 SORRELL DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MCCANN, JUDY 70320 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MCCLEARY, LORITA A 7028 GLEN TERRA CT SE OLYMPIA, WA 98503 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MCDONALD,GILES N & JEANETTE A PO BOX 576 PALMER, AK 99645 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MCKITTRICK, SCOTT C & ELIZABETH A 17690 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MCNERNEY RYCHLICK TRUST RYCHLICK, CRAIG & MCNERNEY, COLEEN TTEES 70340 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MEDARY, SARAH J & MATTHEWS, JENNIFER 450 FULVUE DR EUGENE, OR 97405 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Meece, Brian P.O. Box 7047 Bend, OR 97708 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MEECE, CAROLYN R & SAXTON, JAN C 1900 NE 3RD ST #106-352 BEND, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MEEKS, STEPHEN L SR PO BOX 436 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Merrick, Nancy 3012 NE Lansing Ct. Bend, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MILLS,JAMES T 61589 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MINKE, SCOTT 2627 MARY ST LA CRESCENTA, CA 91214 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MITCHELL TRUST MITCHELL, GREGORY A & AMY L TTEES 26620 SW FRENCH OAK DR WEST LINN, OR 97068-9760 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MONROE, JAMES P & OWEN, SUE J PO BOX 1926 SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MOORE,MICHAEL A & KELLIE M 1423 SE CARLTON ST PORTLAND, OR 97202 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MORRISON, JOHN A & BARBARA 944 HOWELL PRAIRIE RD NE SALEM, OR 97317 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MORRISSETTE,D L & PRICE,MARY ANN 415 E OLIVE ST LEBANON, OR 97355 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MORTLAND, SCOTT GREGORY 954 HOME AVE #D CARLSBAD, CA 92008 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

MURRAY, JUSTIN L & BRIDGET M 69215 LAKE DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Newbold, Jacqueline 19615 Tumalo Rim Ct Bend, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Newloy, Veronica 18130 Tumalo Reservior Rd Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Newton-Hudson, Veronica 18130 Tumalo Reservior Rd Bend, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

NIPPERT, LISA PO BOX 1555 OREGON CITY, OR 97045 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

NYGREN, CHRISTOPHER E & CATHERINE R 175 ELVIRA SOUTH LIVERMORE, CA 94550 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ODFW Attn: Heath, Corey & Vaughan, Joy 61374 Parrell Road Bend, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

OLSEN, KIRK ALAN & LISA GORDON 70160 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Oregon Land and Water Alliance Attn: Paul Lipscomb 16991 Bartlemay Lane Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

OSBORN, RONALD E & PRENTICE E 17700 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PADE, DRU & LESLIE 1606 W LAMBERT AVE SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PARIS WAYNE HODGES REVOCABLE LIV... ETAL HODGES,PARIS WAYNE TRUSTEE ETAL 730 HOWELL PRAIRIE RD SE SALEM, OR 97317 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PATTERSON, RICHARD W & BEVERLEY A PO BOX 2473 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PEACOCK, TIMOTHY H & LINDA S 16300 SKYLINE RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PEDERSON, KEVIN & TERRI 2115 PAYTON CIR COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PHILLIPS, DAVID W & BARBARA J PO BOX 8000 PMB 8063 BLACK BUTTE RANCH, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PHILLIPS,VICTOR D & SALLY A 6702 SW PAMLICO CT TUALATIN, OR 97062 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PHILLIPS,VICTOR D & SALLY A 8702 PAMLICO CT TUALATIN, OR 97062 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PINKLEY, JOSHUA PO BOX 92 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

POLCHERT, SUSAN ELIZABETH ET AL 3143 RIVER PLACE DR EUGENE, OR 97401 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

POWELL,JESS S & RHEA L PO BOX 186 CHEMULT, OR 97731 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

POYNOR, TRACY JANENE 70095 CAYUSE DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PRESTON, CRAIG & MARTA 10303 SE 250TH AVE DAMASCUS, OR 97089 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PRICE, BRYAN & JOHNSON, JODY 17715 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PRYOR,THOMAS & SUZANNE 17750 MOUNTAINVIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PUCCINELLI, DOMINIC LOUIS & JUDITH ANN 1153 CALVIN ST EUGENE, OR 97401 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

PUTNAM, SCOTT WILLIAM 52037 OLD WICKIUP RD LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

QUACKENBUSH, ROBERT & MARY PO BOX 115 KENO, OR 97627 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RALPHS,MERI K 53614 BOBWHITE CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RENGGLI, PETER & AMANDA 70363 LONGHORN DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Renker, Craig 64025 Deschutes Market Rd Bend, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Reynolds, Wayne PO Box 933 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RICE, MARY JANE RICE, PATRICE B (CB) 1845 NE 144TH PORTLAND, OR 97230 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RICE, PATRICK BRIAN 1845 NE 144TH AVE PORTLAND, OR 97230 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RICHARD & SUE BASSETT TRUST BASSETT, RICHARD A & SUE A TTEES PO BOX 3500 PMB 158 SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RICHARDS, ROBERT E & PATRICIA K 70175 DOGGIE DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RIDDLE,RICHARD E & PATRICIA L 17600 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTER, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RK HUNT REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST HUNT, RANDY L & KENNA M TTEES 16205 HAWKS LAIR RD LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ROGERS, DONALD ROSS 64181 TUMALO RIM DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ROGERS, MARK D PO BOX 1029 REDMOND, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ROLF, EDWARD R & JUDITH M 17500 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RONALD D REMUND REV LIVING TRUST PO BOX 760 SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ROSS, RONALD R & ELAINE M 17525 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ROY S DEAN & AMBER R DEAN TRUST DEAN, ROY S & AMBER R TTEES 17730 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

RYAN BECK ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 70027 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97475-0100 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SACKS, WAYNE I & KRISTIN S 11145 SW NOVARE PL TIGARD, OR 97223 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SAMPLES, COURD A 3493 MEADOWVIEW ST SE ALBANY, OR 97322 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SANCHEZ, JOSEPH P 20489 OUTBACK CT BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SANTAVICCA, JOSEPH F JR ET AL PO BOX 3239 #107 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SARANICH, RONALD ET AL 70285 MUSTANG DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SAUNDERS, CYNTHIA M ET AL 865 N ASPEN CT CANBY, OR 97013 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SCCRE LLC 63591 OB RILEY RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SCHAEBERLE CARY J & PETERSON DIANE E 3415 SHORTHORN DR JACKSON, WY 83001 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SCHULZ,MARK A & KATHRYN A 61606 RIVER RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SCHWARTZ, TIMOTHY J & ANDREA D 70190 SORRELL DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SCOTT, RONALD ET AL PO BOX 779 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SEAN EASLY TRUST EASLY, SEAN M TTEE 60925 BACHELOR VIEW RD BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SHAW, DAMON & KIERSTEN 5706 CHARLES CIR LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SHEGGEBY, GENE G & SUSAN J 32682 BUSH GARDEN DR HARRISBURG, OR 97446 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SHEPHARD, SCOTT B & MARTHA 2428 NW HAMPTON PORTLAND, OR 97229 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SIMONSON,JOHN W & LYNN K 2166 SE 142ND PORTLAND, OR 97233 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SISTERS VIEW PROPERTIES LLC 17257 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Sisters-Camp Sherman Rural Fire Protection District Chief Roger Johnson PO Box 1509 Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SKJERSAA, TERANCE O II ET AL 16396 SKYLINE DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SLATE FAMILY LIVING TRUST SLATE, GORDON ROY TTEE ET AL 969 RIVERLOOP 2 EUGENE, OR 97404 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SLENNING FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST SLENNING, GAR P & SHANNON TTEES 70160 DOGGIE DR SISTERS, OR 97759-9887 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SMITH, BRADLEY G & HART, KATHLEEN A 9169 SW BURNHAM TIGARD, OR 97223 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SMITH, GERALD R JR 53613 BOBWHITE CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Smith, Russ PO Box 2458 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SMOLICH, DEBRA K 109 TANBARK RD BROOKINGS, OR 97415 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SNAZUK, ROBERT & ROBIN PO BOX 947 GOLD BEACH, OR 97444 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SOLORZANO, JORGE A 70233 LONGHORN DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Springer, Dick 3450 Shallow Springs Terrace Chico, CA 95928 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Stafford, Sue 996 E Creekside Ct. Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STARR, RAY & DEBBIE PO BOX 188 LA PINE, OR 97739-0188 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STEELHAMMER, DANIEL C & JILL M 61307 MT VISTA DR BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STEHLIK, KARIN T 19310 NE 192ND ST BRUSH PRAIRIE, WA 98606 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STEVE & VICKIE TENNANT JOINT TRUST TENNANT, STEVEN H & VICTORIA E TTEES 70295 CLUB RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STEVENSON, JOHN & REBECCA 26833 NE 163RD DUVALL, WA 98019 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Storjohann, Bob 16314 Skyliners Rd Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STORJOHANN,ROBERT LAVERNE & VICKIE K 16314 SKYLINERS RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STRAHM FAMILY JOINT LIVING TRUST STRAHM, LINDA L & SCOTT L TTEES 937 SW EVANS ST PORTLAND, OR 97219 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STROM, STEVEN G 665 HUGHES ST EUGENE, OR 97402 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

STULL, JASON A PO BOX 1440 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SUING,RONALD L & ARLEATHA 15855 FOREST RIDGE LN NE SILVERTON, OR 97381 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SUSAN & TERRY CUNNINGHAM REV LIV TR ETAL CUNNINGHAM, SUSAN K TTEE 20240 NW PAULINA DR PORTLAND, OR 97229 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SUSAN L MONDRY LIVING TRUST MONDRY, SUSAN L TTEE 16366 SKYLINERS RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SWANSON, MICHAEL B & JEANNINE L 70157 SORRELL DR SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

SWEANY, JAMES R & MARGARET J 15000 SE REGNER TERRACE DR DAMASCUS, OR 97089 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TALBOT, HAILEY M GARSIDE 16356 SKYLINE DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TANNER, JAMES & MELINDA 13050 SW CASPIAN CT BEAVERTON, OR 97008 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TAYLOR, GARY E ET AL 63915 WALLACE RD COOS BAY, OR 97420 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TERHAAR & ESTERBROOK REV TRUST TERHAAR, JAMES TTEE ET AL 16322 SKYLINERS RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TERHAAR & ESTERBROOK REV TRUST TERHAAR, JAMES TTEE ETAL 16380 SKYLINERS DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Tess, Tim 21115 Young Ave Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

THOMAS-LISTOU,PENNY G WARREN, PENNY G (A) 23088 W SHEFFLER RD ELMIRA, OR 97437 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

THOMPSON, DANIEL NOBLE & ERIN AMBER 19345 SW LAURELHURST WAY BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

THOMPSON,RALPH PO BOX 2041 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

THORNTON, JAMES R 6020 SW 46TH AVE PORTLAND, OR 97221 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

THS PROPERTIES LLC 63591 OB RILEY RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TONGE, TARINA ROSS 16378 SKYLINERS RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TREADWELL,DOUGLAS L & REBECCA 16298 SKYLINE DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TRIPLETT,SHAWN S & HAL D PO BOX 1821 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Trippany, Elmer PO Box 469 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TUCKER, RONALD D & RUBY A 50904 HWY 97 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

TUCKER, RONALD DEAN & RUBY ANN 50904 HIGHWAY 97 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

URSULA E WIGAND REV LIVING TR WIGAND, URSULA E TRUSTEE PO BOX 133 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

VAN DER LOON, JOEL & LEAH MARIE C/O LEAH VAN DER LOON 17725 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

VAN DER VELDE, CHRISTIAAN D & ERIN M 19376 BLUE BUCKET LN BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

VESTERGAARD, ANDERS & ERIKA 11575 NW BLACKHAWK DR PORTLAND, OR 97229 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Vicari, Greg & Penny PO Box 3296 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

VICARI,GREGORY J & PENNY S PO BOX 3296 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

VILA,REYNALDO L & BLANCHE M 53609 BOBWHITE CT LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Vora, Robin 1679 NE Daphne Ct. Bend, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WALKER, DAN & BOUDREAU, KRISTIN 16292 SKYLINE DR BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WALKER, DANIEL EDWARDS, KATHRINE & STEPHEN (CB) 61575 BEARWALLOW RD BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WALKER,LINDA LEE 2200 ROCKY LN EUGENE, OR 97401 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Warriner, Betsy 119 NW Drake Road Bend, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WEISS, MAXINE L 2995 WAYSIDE LP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WEISS, TOBY & PHYLLIS ANNE 1034 NW BIRCH AVE REDMOND, OR 97756 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WELBOURN, THOMAS R ET AL 904 NE 12TH ST BEND, OR 97701 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WELLHOUSER, JEFFREY J & KRYSTAL 51918 OLD WICKIUP RD LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WHIPPLE,RICHARD A & PENNY A PO BOX 1401 SHERWOOD, OR 97140 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WHITE, GORDON & CYNTHIA PO BOX 3351 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Wicks, Curtis 152008 Long Prairie La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Williams, Rose 16300 Hawks Lair Rd. La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WILLIAMS,JOHN K ETAL 64682 COOK AVE #99 BEND, OR 97703 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Wolf, Elise 69700 Lake Drive Sisters, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WOODSON, TERRY L & PAMELA A 17470 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SISTERS, OR 97759 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

WRIGHT LIVING TRUST WRIGHT,GEORGIA L TRUSTEE PO BOX 621 LA PINE, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Wright, Georgia PO Box 621 La Pine, OR 97739 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

YETTER, RICHARD C & CAROL J 6525 CORVALLIS RD INDEPENDENCE, OR 97351 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

Young, Cheryl & Danny 20903 Knott Rd Bend, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

YOZAMP, JAMES M JR & KRISTINE K 170 SW SCALEHOUSE LOOP BEND, OR 97702 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

ZOLLBRECHT,TIMOTHY T & BRENDA A F 22980 SE NAOMI CT DAMASCUS, OR 97089 247-19-000265-PA NOPH (2)

1

Zechariah Heck

From: Howard, Gordon Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 5:01 PMTo: Edelman, Scott; Zechariah HeckCc: Peter Gutowsky; Adam SmithSubject: RE: Deschutes County Nonprime Resource Lands Amendments

Follow Up Flag: Follow upDue By: Tuesday, February 04, 2020 8:30 AMFlag Status: Flagged

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Given the lack of definitive case law on the subject, we can provide no guarantees or warranties regarding our advice on this issue. However, we would have no objection to a Deschutes County decision that the revised scope of this code change, as you described below, did not require re‐notice as a substantial change to a proposed post‐acknowledgment plan amendment. In looking at the general tenor of case law on this subject, we believe that your tentative decision on this matter is sound.  Gordon Howard Community Services Division Manager Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 | Salem, OR 97301-2540 Direct: 503-934-0034 | Cell: 503-856-6935 | Main: 503-373-0050 gordon.howard@state.or.us www.oregon.gov/LCD  

  From: Zechariah Heck [mailto:Zechariah.Heck@deschutes.org]  Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 4:57 PM To: Howard, Gordon ; Edelman, Scott  Cc: Peter Gutowsky ; Adam Smith  Subject: RE: Deschutes County Nonprime Resource Lands Amendments  Thanks, Gordon.  Just to clarify, DLCD does not see a need for Deschutes County to re‐notice a PAPA for the Nonprime Resource Lands amendments based on the omission of specific policies pertaining to general eligibility criteria for quasi‐judicial applications?  

Zechariah Heck | Associate Planner DESCHUTES  COUNTY  COMMUNITY  DEVELOPMENT 117 NW Lafayette Avenue | Bend, Oregon 97703 PO Box 6005 | Bend, Oregon 97708 

2

Tel: (541) 385‐1704 | www.deschutes.org/cd

Disclaimer: Please note that the information in this email is an informal statement made in accordance with DCC 22.20.005 and shall not be deemed to constitute final County action effecting a change in the status of a person's property or conferring any rights, including any reliance rights, on any person.  From: Howard, Gordon   Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 4:22 PM To: Edelman, Scott ; Zechariah Heck  Cc: Peter Gutowsky  Subject: RE: Deschutes County Nonprime Resource Lands Amendments  

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Hello Zechariah, while there isn’t any definitive LUBA decision on this particular point, we found the following LUBA headnotes on decisions involving 35‐day notice questions:  25.3.3 Local Government Procedures – Compliance with Statutes – Notice of Hearing. ORS 197.610(1) requires that the Land Conservation and Development Commission be given notice at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on adoption of a post‐acknowledgment comprehensive plan amendment. Where the required notice is given, a second notice is not required under ORS 197.610(1) simply because the local government decides to adopt different parts of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment by separate ordinances. Johnson v. Jefferson County, 56 Or LUBA 72 (2008).  25.3.3 Local Government Procedures ‐ Compliance with Statutes ‐ Notice of Hearing. While deviations from the post acknowledgment plan amendment notice requirements at ORS 197.610(1) may constitute procedural errors that will not provide a basis for remand absent prejudice to a petitioner’s substantial rights, a complete failure to provide notice to the Department of Land Conservation and Development under ORS 197.610(1) is a substantive error and requires remand without regard to whether the failure prejudiced petitioner’s substantial rights. Friends of Bull Mountain v. City of Tigard, 51 Or LUBA 759 (2006)  25.3.3 Local Government Procedures ‐ Compliance with Statutes ‐ Notice of Hearing. Providing notice and a copy of proposed zoning ordinance amendments to DLCD under ORS 197.610(1) and then adopting an additional zoning ordinance amendment that was not included with the notice without providing additional notice to DLCD is not error. OCAPA v. City of Mosier, 44 Or LUBA 452 (2003).  25.3.3 Local Government Procedures ‐ Compliance with Statutes ‐ Notice of Hearing. The broad notice and potential for participation by DLCD and others under ORS 197.610 is the quid pro quo for ORS 197.625, which deems post‐acknowledgment land use regulation amendments to be consistent with the statewide planning goals as a matter of law, if the amendment is not appealed or is affirmed on appeal. Therefore, whether errors in a city’s notice to DLCD under ORS 197.610 warrant remand depends upon whether the errors are of the kind or of a degree that calls into question whether the ORS 197.610 to 197.625 process nevertheless performed its function. If so, remand may be required, without regard to whether petitioners before LUBA can demonstrate prejudice to their substantial rights. OCAPA v. City of Mosier, 44 Or LUBA 452 (2003).  25.3.3 Local Government Procedures – Compliance with Statutes – Notice of Hearing. Not every violation of the requirement at ORS 197.610(1) and its implementing rule that a local government provide notice of proposed post‐acknowledgment plan amendments to the Department of Land Conservation and Development Commission (DLCD)more than 45 days before the initial public hearing is a substantive error that must result in remand. Failure to 

3

specify all of the proposed zone changes on the form provided to DLCD is, at most, procedural error that does not warrant remand absent a demonstration of prejudice to petitioner’s substantial rights. Stallkamp v. City of King City, 43 Or LUBA 333 (2002).  What the tenor of these headnotes from LUBA decisions tells me is that you have the ability to cut out portions of the proposal and move forward with the rest without providing a new 35‐day notice.  Gordon Howard Community Services Division Manager Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 | Salem, OR 97301-2540 Direct: 503-934-0034 | Cell: 503-856-6935 | Main: 503-373-0050 gordon.howard@state.or.us www.oregon.gov/LCD  

  From: Zechariah Heck [mailto:Zechariah.Heck@deschutes.org]  Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:23 PM To: Edelman, Scott ; Howard, Gordon  Cc: Peter Gutowsky  Subject: Deschutes County Nonprime Resource Lands Amendments  Scott and Gordon,   Please see 1,000 Friends of Oregon testimony on Deschutes County’s Nonprime Resource Lands amendments (attached). On page 3, 1k Friends states the County’s proposal has substantially changed and is therefore in violation with ORS 197.610. We request DLCD staff’s advice on the matter.   As you may recall, the County’s proposal originally had two components:  

Specific Comprehensive Plan policies to correct mapping errors for six (6) residential areas;  

General  Comprehensive  Plan  policies  that  establish  eligibility  criteria  for  applicant‐initiated,  quasi‐judicial applications.  

In October of last year, the Board directed staff to move forward with the policies specific to the six residential areas that are inaccurately designated as resource land (EFU / Forest Use). The general policies were to be further reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff contends the proposal has not substantially changed because the six residential areas have not changed, the proposed policies specific to the six residential areas have stayed the same, and only one policy has been added based on public testimony during the public hearings. Only the general eligibility criteria have been omitted.  Please let us know as soon as possible if we need to re‐notice the proposed amendments.   Thank you,    

4

Zechariah Heck | Associate Planner DESCHUTES  COUNTY  COMMUNITY  DEVELOPMENT 117 NW Lafayette Avenue | Bend, Oregon 97703 PO Box 6005 | Bend, Oregon 97708 Tel: (541) 385‐1704 | www.deschutes.org/cd

Disclaimer: Please note that the information in this email is an informal statement made in accordance with DCC 22.20.005 and shall not be deemed to constitute final County action effecting a change in the status of a person's property or conferring any rights, including any reliance rights, on any person.   

133 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 201 • Portland, OR 97204 • (503) 497-1000 • www.friends.org

January 22, 2020

SENT VIA EMAIL

Deschutes County Board of Commissioners

Deschutes Services Building

1300 NW Wall Street, 2nd Floor

Bend, OR 97703

Re: Comments in Support of Denial of the Proposed Comprehensive Plan

Amendments that are Inconsistent with State-Mandated Resource Protection

To the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners:

Please accept these comments to be included in the record regarding proposed Ordinance No.

2019-007 on behalf of 1000 Friends of Oregon. 1000 Friends of Oregon urges the Deschutes

County Board of Commissioners to deny the proposed plan amendments for all the reasons noted

in prior testimony, and as provided below. These final comments are in response to recent county

testimony.

A. It is settled law that soil classification is a stand-alone consideration when determining whether land is “Agricultural Land,” and lands that are categorized as such cannot be

removed from that category based on external factors.

County staff asserted at the January 15, 2020 hearing that external factors need to be considered

when determining whether land constitutes resource land notwithstanding NRCS soil

classification, and that this “aggressive interpretation” offers “a matter of first impression.”

Although the County’s preferred interpretation is indeed aggressive (and illegal, as outlined in

our prior testimony), it is notably not a matter of first impression. Binding case law explains that

if land qualifies as “Agricultural Land” under OAR 660-033-0020(1)(a)(A) due to soil

classification, that land “cannot be classified as something other than agricultural land based on

existing land use patterns or any of the other factors listed in the Goal 3 definition of agricultural

land.” Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County, 47 Or LUBA 508, 525-526 (2004). See also

OAR 660-033-0030(1). Any other interpretation is not founded in the law.

B. County testimony demonstrates that lands subject to the plan amendments may support commercial timber utilization.

In the December 18, 2019 testimony of Ed Keith, County Forester, he explained that the lands

subject to the plan amendments are available for commercial timber utilization. In addition, Mr.

Keith excepts from his analysis Section 36, and therefore imples that Section 36 supports even

greater commercial timber utilization than as discussed in the section titled “Analysis.” Further,

2 of 3

Mr. Keith’s analysis addresses only “the average lot size,” and therefore does not provide an

adequate factual basis or constitute substantial evidence regarding whether the plan amendment’s

application to every subject parcel is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 4.

C. County testimony demonstrates that the proposed plan amendments would allow for residential development in areas where there are not sufficient wastewater treatments

services.

The January 3, 2020 testimony of Todd Cleveland, County Environmental Health Inspector

explains that alternative septic technology may be required to provide adequate septic service to

a number of properties subject to the plan amendments. Alternative treatment technology is very

expensive, with some systems costing around $45,000. The County should not motivate

development in areas where conventional septic systems cannot support the amount of residential

uses allowed by the zoning. Mr. Cleveland’s testimony notes that Meadow Crest Acres is located

in an area of groundwater concern and based on detailed hydrological analysis needs nitrogen

reducing onsite wastewater technologies to best protect water resources for future beneficial

uses. Mr. Cleveland’s testimony neither demonstrates that all properties within Meadow Crest

Acres subject to the plan amendments will be served by existing onsite wastewater systems, nor

indicates what the cost of necessary advanced wastewater systems would be, and how that would

affect affordability.

The County’s approach could motivate residential development in areas subject to the plan

amendments that results in exceeding an area’s carrying capacity for wastewater and nitrogen.

This could create a risk of a public health hazard. Such an approach could force later-in-time

developers to be required to install expensive technology to manage their wastewater, where

prior developments are able to unfairly utilize cheaper conventional systems that led to the

breach of capacity of the area’s wastewater management capabilities.

Mr. Cleveland also notes that some parcels subject to the plan amendments may not be able to

obtain approval for any type of system. It is poor planning to rezone lands to allow for housing

outright where the County’s Environmental Health Inspector determines that some of the lots

cannot have adequate waste disposal. 1000 Friends of Oregon is aware that there is a site

evaluation performed prior to issuance for septic permits, but where the County has already

analyzed the septic capabilities of the subject properties, and determined that some of them

cannot support septic, those properties should be excluded from rezoning to allow for housing

outright. Also, Mr. Cleveland’s testimony explains that previously subdivided lots have already

been issued approved site evaluations prior to final plat issuance, and in some cases, records are

quite old and limited. Outdated evaluations for septic allowances should be reviewed and

updated based on current conditions. Mr. Cleveland’s conclusion that onsite wastewater

treatment systems are not a significant limitation to residential uses within the areas subject to

the plan amendments is not supported by his own testimony because he admits that the records

are outdated and of limited use, and acknowledges that some parcels do not have the capacity to

3 of 3

gain approval for any type of wastewater system. The county should reconsider zoning areas for

housing that lack the ability to properly manage wastewater.

D. Procedural Errors

The County’s proposal has changed substantially from its original proposal, including the

modification of proposed plan provisions that address actions involving the Department of Land

Conservation and Development. There is a concern that the County has not followed all aspects

of ORS 197.610, including subsection (6). 1000 Friends of Oregon requests that the County issue

findings demonstrating the county’s ongoing compliance with that statute.

E. Conclusion

The proposed amendments fail to apply state requirements governing agricultural land in

violation of Statewide Planning Goal 3. The proposed amendments fail to apply the definition of

Agricultural Land, provided at OAR 660‐033‐0020(1). Without a showing that the

redesignations envisioned by the proposed amendments for the subject properties will comply

with the definition of agricultural land, the proposed amendments are inconsistent with Goal 3.

The proposed amendments violate Statewide Planning Goal 4. The county errs in its

determination that parcelization and ownership status determine whether land is forestland under

Goal 4. See OAR 660-006-0010(2). Mr. Keith’s testimony fails to adequately address all

properties subject to the plan amendments, and their potential productivity.

Without ensuring compliance now with Goal 3 and Goal 4 for the many redesignations of

agricultural and forest land that would ensue upon adoption, the proposed amendments fail to

meet the standard at ORS 197.175(2)(a) that all post‐acknowledgement plan amendments comply with the goals. For all the reasons provided above and submitted in prior testimony, we

strongly urge the county to deny the proposed amendments. We request notice of any further

action to be provided to scott@friends.org. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this

important issue.

Scott Hilgenberg

Rural Lands Legislative Attorney

1000 Friends of Oregon

File No. 247-19-000265-PA

Board of County CommissionersJanuary 15, 2020

Nonprime Resource Lands

What are Nonprime Resource Lands?

• Known as “Non-Resource” Lands under OAR 660-004-005(3).

• Exceedingly low capacity to be managed for commercial agriculture and/or forestry activities.

• Do not meet State agricultural land or forestlands definitions.

Nonprime Resource Lands

Proposal 1 Proposal 2

Comprehensive Plan Direction

2.2.13 – Identify and retain accuratelydesignated agricultural lands.

Proposal 1

Residential Committed Areas

237 lots110 are vacantApx. 900 acres*

Comprehensive Plan AmendmentsSection 1.3 – Land Use PlanningSection 2.2 – Agricultural landsSection 2.3 – Forest LandsSection 3.1 – IntroductionSection 3.2 – Rural DevelopmentSection 3.3 – Rural HousingSection 3.11 – New Nonprime Resource Lands

Updates

• Letters from cities, fire districts, and County Forester

• New policy (3.11.2)

• Coordination with ODFW

Nonprime Resource LandsPolicy 3.11.2Property must demonstrate:a. It is located in a fire-protection district or can be

annexed into one;b.There is adequate access for fire apparatus to

serve the subject property; or c. Other measures that prove there is adequate fire

protection for potential uses.

Updates

• Letters from cities, fire districts, and County Forester

• New policy (3.11.2)

• Coordination with ODFW

Questions…

www.deschutes.org/npr

Zechariah Heck, Associate Planner541-385-1704Zechariah.heck@deschutes.org

1

Zechariah Heck

From: Peter GutowskySent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:33 PMTo: Zechariah HeckSubject: Re: Nonprime Resource Lands / DLCD Correspondence / RecordAttachments: DLCD_Deschutes County HB2229 letter 1-8-15.pdf

Zech,  Please place this letter into the Nonprime Resource Lands record. Rob Hallyburton, DLCD states,  

“County staff described several non‐contiguous problem areas. The county stated that its goal was “for partially platted subdivisions zoned for EFU or Forest to be legislatively rezoned to MUA‐10.” 

  “the department has been unable to determine the nature and scope of the mapping error the county intends 

to address. It is not apparent why the areas the county has shared with the department were incorrectly zoned at acknowledgment, and this is a fundamental aspect of the bill. If the county chooses to move forward with a work program, the county will need to demonstrate that the HB 2229 process is an appropriate vehicle for addressing the county’s needs. 

 

Peter Gutowsky, AICP | Planning Manager DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN T 117 NW Lafayette Avenue | Bend, Oregon 97703 Tel: (541) 385-1709

Enhancing the lives of citizens by delivering quality services in a cost-effective manner.   

Oregon John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor

Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150

Salem, Oregon 97301-2540

Phone: (503) 373-0050

Fax: (503) 378-5518

www.oregon.gov/LCD

January 8, 2015

Deschutes County Planning Commission SENT VIA E-MAIL

c/o Nick Lelack, Community Development Director

117 NW Lafayette Avenue

Bend, Oregon 97701

RE: HB 2229 question regarding scope of review

Deschutes County planning staff has requested the opinion of the Department of Land

Conservation and Development (the department) on whether HB 2229 requires all, or most,

farm- or forest-zoned lands in a county to be considered in a “reacknowledgment” process, or

whether smaller, non-contiguous tracts could be considered as the first phase of a multi-phase

reacknowledgment process.

County staff described several non-contiguous problem areas. The county stated that its goal was

“for partially platted subdivisions zoned for EFU or Forest to be legislatively rezoned to MUA-

10.” Department staff consulted with county staff on these areas, and studied maps of five of the

areas and past county attempts to find solutions. The total acreage of these areas equals about

840 acres.

Analysis

HB 2229 is memorialized at Chapter 873 Oregon Laws 2009. The relating clause “Relating to

recommendations of the Oregon Task Force on Land Use Planning…” gives an indication that

certain themes in the bill originated with “The Big Look.” A theme that wound through the Big

Look was that land use laws should treat different regions of the state fairly, recognizing the

geographical, ecological and cultural aspects of each region. Section 2(B) of HB 2229, for

example, directs that the Land Conservation and Development Commission to “consider the

variation in conditions and needs in different regions of the state and encourage regional

approaches to resolve land use problems.”

For this discussion, section 5 of HB 2229 is applicable. A portion of section 5 is provided below.

SECTION 5. (1) For the purposes of correcting mapping errors made in the

acknowledgment process and updating the designation of farmlands and

forestlands for land use planning, a county may conduct a legislative review of

lands in the county to determine whether the lands planned and zoned for farm

use, forest use or mixed farm and forest use are consistent with the definitions of

“agricultural lands” or “forest lands” in goals relating to agricultural lands or

forestlands.

Deschutes County Planning Commission Page 2 of 3

January 8, 2015

(2) A county may undertake the reacknowledgment process authorized by

this section only if the Department of Land Conservation and Development

approves a work plan, from the county, describing the expected scope of

reacknowledgment. The department may condition approval of a work plan for

reacknowledgment under this section to reflect the resources needed to complete

the review required by sections 7 and 13 of this 2009 Act. The work plan of the

county and the approval of the department are not final orders for purposes of

review. (3) A county that undertakes the reacknowledgment process authorized by

this section shall provide an opportunity for all lands planned for farm use, forest

use or mixed farm and forest use and all lands subject to an exception under ORS

197.732 to a goal relating to agricultural lands or forestlands to be included in the

review.

This states that the county may undertake a “reacknowledgement” process by conducting a

legislative review for the purpose of correcting mapping errors made during its original

acknowledgment. Determining whether a proposal is a “legislative review” requires

consideration of three questions:

1. Is the process bound to result in a decision? 2. Is the decision bound to apply preexisting criteria to concrete facts? 3. Is the action directed at a closely circumscribed factual situation or a relatively small

number of persons?

This is not a “bright line” test. The more definitively these questions are answered in the

negative, the more likely the process is legislative. In this case, the answer to question 1 is

clearly no. Regarding question 2, the project would be subject to existing criteria in (at least)

Goals 3 and 4 and HB 2229; it is typical for goals and statutes to apply to local legislative

decisions, however, so this is not determinative but it does lend additional weight to question 3.

Regarding question 3, the department is uncomfortable determining that the county is proposing

a legislative review when it includes only 840 acres in five areas. We don’t know the number of

“persons” it would be directed at, but the number can’t be very large.

Section 5 states the review is of “lands in the county” and that the county must provide an

opportunity for all lands in a resource zone to be provided an opportunity for consideration.

While the phrase “lands in the county” is not entirely clear, the department’s understanding of

the legislative intent is that the reference to “lands in the county,” when combined with the

“legislative review” language, is that counties are not authorized to (1) set up a framework in the

comprehensive plan and then require individual applications for re-designation of land or (2)

pick and choose small areas to review. While we do not find that the county must review all land

in the county, we would be most inclined to approve a work program that includes some major

region defined by geographic characteristics rather than by property or subdivision boundaries.

Additionally, the county may not pre-determine specific areas for review, as subsection 5(3)

requires the county to provide an opportunity for all farm and forest land to be considered. If the

Deschutes County Planning Commission Page 3 of 3

January 8, 2015

county receives a request to review an area that is not included in the original proposal, the

county must review it. As explained above, we believe that this area must be a geographic area

of the county and not individual properties or subdivisions.

Regarding phasing of review, the department would entertain a work program that lays out the

project in pieces, but those pieces should each address a substantial part of the county and

address all the other requirements of HB 2229.

Additional Consideration

Considering other aspects of HB 2229 not related to your question, the department has been

unable to determine the nature and scope of the mapping error the county intends to address. It is

not apparent why the areas the county has shared with the department were incorrectly zoned at

acknowledgment, and this is a fundamental aspect of the bill. If the county chooses to move

forward with a work program, the county will need to demonstrate that the HB 2229 process is

an appropriate vehicle for addressing the county’s needs.

Summary

The department does not read HB 2229 to require the county review all farm and forest lands in

the county under the provisions of section 5 of the law. On the other hand, we do not find that it

permits the county to look only at small areas defined by existing subdivisions, but instead

requires a review of a substantial part of the county.

We look forward to working with Deschutes County as it considers whether to submit a work

program for a project to correct mapping errors in its rural zones under HB 2229. We hope this

adequately answers your question, but we are available for further consultation if it does not.

Sincerely,

Rob Hallyburton

Community Services Division Manager

cc: Scott Edelman, Regional Representative

Jon Jinings, Community Services Specialist

Michael Morrissey, Rural Policy Analyst

117 NW Lafayette Avenue, Bend, Oregon 97703 | P.O. Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708-6005 (541) 388-6575 cdd@deschutes .org www.deschutes.org/cd

MEMORANDUM

TO: Board of County Commissioners (“Board”)

FROM: Zechariah Heck, Associate Planner

DATE: January 8, 2020

SUBJECT: Nonprime Resource Lands / Hearing Preparation (File No. 247-19-000265-PA)

The Board will continue a public hearing on the Nonprime Resource (“NPR”) Lands amendments on

January 15, 2020.

I. BACKGROUND

An initial public hearing was held by the Board on November 18, 2019 to receive public testimony and

consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation to approve Comprehensive Plan amendments

that establish eligibility criteria for six specific areas currently designated Exclusive Farm Use or Forest

Use to Nonprime Resource (NPR) Lands, defined in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-004-0005(3)

as “Non Resource Lands.” These areas are legacy residential developments as they were platted or

conveyed prior to State enabling planning legislation taking effect in Deschutes County.

The six subject properties are:

Haner Park

Section 36 (Township 22, Range 10)

Skyline Subdivision

1st Addition to Skyline Subdivision

Squaw Creek Canyon Recreational

Estates 1st Addition

Meadow Crest Acres Subdivision

Central Oregon Landwatch commented during the November 18 hearing in addition to submitting

written testimony. 1,000 Friends of Oregon also submitted written testimony. Both organizations

oppose the proposed amendments by stating the County has made conclusionary statements that lack

factual basis for complying with Statewide Planning Goals 2 - Land Use Planning, 3 - Agricultural Lands,

4 - Forest Lands, 5 - Natural Resources, 7 - Natural Hazards, 10 - Housing, 11 - Public Facilities and

Services and 12 - Transportation.

The hearing was continued to January 15, 2020.

Page 2 of 9

II. UPDATED FINDINGS / POLICIES

Staff is in the process of responding to the concerns raised by Central Oregon Landwatch and 1,000

Friends of Oregon by coordinating with Oregon State Extension, County Forester, Oregon Department

of Fish and Wildlife, rural fire protection districts, and the cities of Bend, La Pine, Redmond and Sisters.

Staff requests the Board consider an open record period after the January 15 public hearing to allow

several letters from the above mentioned agencies to be included in the record.

Goal 2 – Land Use Planning

Both Central Oregon Landwatch and 1,000 Friends of Oregon expressed concern of the terminology

“committed residential areas”, by suggesting it inflates a relationship with the State exception process

(ORS 197.732(2)(b) and OAR 660-004-0028). This was not the intention. The purpose of the amendments

is to address six legacy residential developments that preceded the statewide land use system. These

areas are developed with residential uses and contain rural-residential infrastructure, i.e., septic

systems, roads, electric utilities. Each subject property has a small average lot size. There is no history

or evidence of farm or forest uses. Nonetheless, staff has omitted the word “committed” in reference

to these areas to clear any potential confusion.

Goal 3 – Agricultural Lands

Squaw Creek Canyon Recreational Estates 1st Addition and Meadow Crest Subdivision are zoned

Exclusive Farm Use, which is intended to preserve agricultural land and restrict developments

unrelated to farming activities that may create conflicts.1 However, both of these areas are residentially

developed, have less than a 2.5 acre average lot size, and each lot is privately owned by separate

parties. There is no history or evidence of agricultural uses or irrigation on these properties.

Staff has coordinated with Oregon State Extension to perform an analysis of the commercial viability

of farming these properties. Unfortunately, Oregon State Extension was not able to provide a letter by

the submittal date of this memorandum. Staff will update the Board on January 15 regarding an

anticipated letter.

Goal 4 – Forest Lands

Skyline Subdivision, 1st Addition to Skyline Subdivision, Haner Park, Section 36, and a portion of Squaw

Creek Canyon Recreation Estates are zoned Forest Use 2, which is intended to preserve forest lands for

commercial forestry. Despite the purpose of the zone, these areas are developed with residential uses

and have no history of commercial forest activities.

County Forester Ed Keith performed an analysis to determine the economic potential of each area if

utilized as the zone intends, i.e., a commercial forestry operation (Attachment 1). Mr. Keith’s analysis

concludes that only a small-scale firewood business could exist on the subject properties. Such an

operation would yield approximately $18.22 per acre on an annual basis for the most productive areas.

1 Squaw Creek Canyon Recreation Estates has an area zoned Forest Use 2 as well.

Page 3 of 9

Mr. Keith’s analysis justifies why these areas are not suitable for commercial forest uses, now and into

the future, including adjacent or nearby lands for forest operations and practices.

Goal 5 – Natural Resources

Three of the subject properties contain acknowledged Goal 5 habitat for winter deer range or deer

migration corridors:

Squaw Creek Canyon Recreational Estates 1st Addition (Winter Deer Range)

Meadow Crest Acres Subdivision (Deer Migration Corridor)

Section 36 (Deer Migration Corridor)

Deschutes County acknowledges the Wildlife Combining Zone, a Goal 5 wildlife inventory affects these

three areas. However, the proposal does not create a new conflicting use. Residential uses and their

accessory structures are allowed today and would be permitted if the Comprehensive Plan policies are

adopted and a corresponding zone change to Nonprime Resource Lands -10 occurs. The process for

developing a residential use is the only thing that would change. Today, a property owner must apply

and receive approval for a conditional use permit to develop a residence.2 Single-family residential uses

would be permitted outright if the proposed amendments are adopted and the County subsequently

adopts and applies a Nonprime Resource Lands zone to the subject properties. This would help

eliminate the regulatory burden faced by property owners in these areas, without creating a new

conflicting use.

Staff has coordinated with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) to determine if they

have any concerns with the County’s proposal. Clarification that all new housing, regardless if it is

permitted conditionally or outright, is required to meet Wildlife Area Combining Zone fencing and siting

standards was shared with the department. ODFW staff had not submitted any concerns at the time of

writing.

Goal 7 – Natural Hazards and Goal 12 – Transportation

Testimony submitted on November 18 described concerns with permitting additional development in

areas that could be considered a wildfire hazard area. In response to this concern, staff asked fire

districts to comment on the proposed amendments. Sisters – Camp Sherman Rural Fire Protection

District and Deschutes County Rural Fire Protection District #2 both provided comments, Attachments

2 and 3, respectively. The fire districts stated no concerns regarding the proposal. Both districts

referenced the policies that prevent future land divisions (Policies 3.3.2 and 3.11.6) and the fact that a

limited number of future residences could be established on the subject properties. Furthermore, staff

has updated the proposed Comprehensive Plan policies to include a new policy, Policy 3.11.2 that

addresses wildfire hazards and transportation access by requiring applicants to demonstrate a subject

property has adequate fire protection.

2 DCC 18.128.015, General Standards Governing Conditional Uses, which contain compatibility criteria, do not

apply to individual single-family dwellings.

Page 4 of 9

Policy 3.11.2 In addition to State rules governing nonresource lands, to qualify for a Nonprime

Resource Lands comprehensive plan designation and Nonprime Resource Lands

zoning, a property must demonstrate:

a. It is located in a fire-protection district or can be annexed into one;

b. There is adequate access for fire apparatus to serve the subject property; or

c. Other measures that prove there is adequate fire protection for potential uses.

This policy will inform a provision in a Nonprime Resource Lands -10 zone to ensure that prior to issuing

a new residential dwelling permit, the applicant demonstrates adequate access and fire protection.

With the letters from fire districts now a part of the record and the inclusion of a specific wildfire hazard

policy, there are no Goal 7 or 12 impacts with the proposed amendments.

Goal 10 – Housing

In aggregate, a total of 110 residences could be established on the six subject properties. The nearest

property proposed for redesignation is approximately two miles away from an Urban Growth Boundary

(UGB), i.e., Squaw Creek Canyon Recreational Estates to the City of Sisters. The rest of the properties

are at least three miles away from an UGB. Staff has coordinated with the cities of Bend, Sisters, La

Pine, and Redmond to determine if there would be any impact on their Goal 10 – housing obligations

in case the proposed amendments yielded full build-out of each subject property. Each municipality

provided a letter for the record stating there would be no impact on their housing objectives

(Attachments 4, 5, 6, and 7). Not one of the subject properties is within a city’s 20-year housing needs

analysis or buildable lands inventory. These letters demonstrate there are no Goal 10 impacts with the

proposed amendments.

Goal 11 – Public Facilities and Services

Opposition to the proposed amendments include assertions they fail to address whether the soils and

water table for the subject properties are of sufficient quality and depth to accommodate the

wastewater needs of potential residential development. Todd Cleveland, Deschutes County

Environmental Health Supervisor, has provided a letter to the record stating onsite wastewater

treatment systems are not a significant limitation to residential uses on the subject property

(Attachment 8).

Additional statements were raised that the findings failed to address whether domestic wells will

provide sufficient water for the proposed uses and whether additional residential water use will impact

irrigation on resource lands. There are no groundwater limitations near the subject properties. Oregon

Water Resource Department (OWRD) is responsible for administering State regulations relating to

domestic wells and irrigation demands. Deschutes County does not have the authority to prohibit land

uses based on concerns of limited groundwater availability. It is the responsibility of a property owner

to verify with OWRD that a domestic well could be successful. This is the modus operandi today when

one applies for a residence in the County, regardless of zoning, and it will remain if the County’s

proposal is adopted.

Page 5 of 9

Summary

The State land use system is not working for these six legacy residential areas zoned EFU and Forest

Use. Property owners in these areas must go through a perfunctory process in order to exercise their

property rights because of inaccurate zoning designations. The subject properties look and act like rural

residential subdivisions. They have decades of residential development since each area was platted or

conveyed prior to State land use legislation taking effect in the County. A majority of the properties are

developed with single-family residences and will continue to be developed. The question at hand is

what process the County and State will require property owners to go through?

The State’s non-resource land program, locally referred to as Nonprime Resource Lands, is a

mechanism that can alleviate the regulatory burden and reflect the actual lay of the land of these legacy

residential areas. This has been an issue Deschutes County has attempted to address for over a decade.

The County has been told these areas are not mapping errors, and, thus, cannot be addressed through

the State’s Big Look Bill. Staff from the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD)

have stated the County cannot utilize an exception process for these areas because too many non-farm

and template dwellings have been approved. The only option to address the anomaly of the situation

is to redesignate the subject properties under the proposed Nonprime Resource Lands amendments.

The system creating a hardship for the property owners of Squaw Creek Canyon Recreation Estates,

Skyline Subdivision and 1st Addition, Meadow Crest Acres, Haner Park and Section 36 can be improved.

The State’s non-resource land program permits a jurisdiction to rezone properties that have an

exceedingly low capacity to be managed for commercial agriculture and/or forestry activities. The

County has shown the subject properties do not meet the definitions of either agricultural land or forest

lands found in Statewide Planning Goals 3 and 4 and accompanying Oregon Revised Statutes and

Oregon Administrative Rules due to the presence of poor soil conditions, a lack of irrigation, climate

conditions and other relevant factors, including but not limited to past use. Furthermore, the attached

letters demonstrate the County has adequately coordinated with applicable agencies and jurisdictions

to confirm the proposal complies with applicable statewide planning goals and State law.

III. NEXT STEPS

An attached matrix lists the updated draft goal and policy amendments with staff comments. Again,

the County will propose a new NPR Lands designation and NPR-10 zone solely to the six legacy

residential areas if the amendments are acknowledged. This new zone will allow a single-family dwelling

or a manufactured home and their accessory uses outright.

At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board can:

Continue the hearing to a date certain;

Close the hearing and leave the written record open to a date certain; or

Close the hearing and commence deliberations or schedule to a later date.

Page 6 of 9

Attachments:

1. Letter from Ed Keith, Deschutes County Forester

2. Letter from Sisters – Camp Sherman Rural Fire Protection District

3. Letter from Deschutes County Rural Fire Protection District

4. Letter from the City of Bend

5. Letter from the City of Redmond

6. Letter from the City of Sisters

7. Letter from the City of La Pine

8. Letter from Todd Cleveland, Deschutes County Environmental Health Supervisor

Page 7 of 9

Nonprime Resource Lands Proposed Goal and Policy Amendments

Section 2.2 Agricultural Lands Comments

Policy 2.2.3 Allow comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments,

including those that qualifying Nonprime Resource Lands

defined in OAR 660-004-005(3) as “Non Resource Lands,” as

non-resource land, for individual EFU parcels as allowed by

State Statute, Oregon Administrative Rules and this

Comprehensive Plan.

Clarifies Nonprime/Non-resource Land amendments are

allowed per State Statute, Oregon Administrative Rules

and the Comprehensive Plan

Section 2.3 Forest Lands Comments

Policy 2.3.13 Allow comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments,

including qualifying Nonprime Resource Lands defined in OAR

660-004-005(3) as “Non Resource Lands,” for Forest Use zoned

parcels as allowed by State Statute, Oregon Administrative

Rules and this Comprehensive Plan.

“

Section 3.3 Rural Housing Comments

Policy 3.3.1 The minimum parcel size for new rural residential parcels in

Rural Residential Exception Areas shall be 10 acres.

Standard minimum parcel size for rural residential

parcels; consistent with State rules

Policy 3.3.2 Land divisions are prohibited in the Nonprime Resource Lands-

10 zone.

Land divisions are not allowed in the six legacy

residential areas today due to resource zoning

restrictions and small minimum parcels sizes. Policy

3.11.5 reinforces that land divisions are prohibited.

Section 3.11 Nonprime Resource Lands Comments

Goal 1 Allow the designation of Nonprime Resource Lands in Deschutes County

Nonprime Resource Lands – General Policies

Policy 3.11.1 Property owners can continue to apply through a quasi-judicial

process for a rezone from Exclusive Farm Use or Forest Use to

a nonresource zone consistent with State law.

Maintains the status quo by allowing property owners to

apply to rezone their properties from Exclusive Farm Use

or Forest Use to a nonresource zone.

Page 8 of 9

Policy 3.11.2 In addition to State rules governing nonresource lands, to

qualify for a Nonprime Resource Lands comprehensive plan

designation and Nonprime Resource Lands zoning, a property

must demonstrate:

a. It is located in a fire-protection district or can be annexed

into one;

b. There is adequate access for fire apparatus to serve the

subject property; or

c. Other measures that prove there is adequate fire

protection for potential uses.

Addresses Goal 7 – Natural Hazards and Goal 12 –

Transportation. Ensures development in Wildland Urban

Interface is only permitted if adequate fire protection

standards are met.

Goal 2 Resolve resource zoning restrictions applied to subdivisions platted prior to statewide planning legislation taking effect in

Deschutes County, Haner Park, and Section 36 in Township 22S, Range 10E

Nonprime Resource Lands – Legacy Residential Policies

Policy 3.11.3 A Nonprime Resource Lands-10 zone provides procedures and

standards for rural residential living environments and

development that balance the public’s interest in the

management of community growth with the protection of

individual property rights.

Purpose Statement

Policy 3.11.4 A single-family dwelling or a manufactured home and their

accessory uses shall be permitted outright.

Legal policy framework to develop