Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11/1/2011
1
OUR CITY, OUR HOMELESS, OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITYMoving our Community Forward to Address HomelessnessCommunity & Staff Presentation November 1 2011Community & Staff Presentation November 1, 2011
1
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Our CityOur City
• Our Homeless
• Our Shared Responsibility
2
11/1/2011
2
OUR CITY
• Who We Are
• A History of What We’ve Done
• Our Vision for the Future
3
OUR CITY
Who We Are
• City staff
• Non‐profit service providers
• Faith‐Based Organizations
• Organized into manypartnerships to help end homelessness in Virginia Beach
• Also part of a regional partnership to end homelessness in the region
4
11/1/2011
3
OUR CITY
A Brief History of Our Work
Frank Bragg, Art Mann and Dick Powell
Brenda McCormick and Mothers Inc. start winter shelter program at area churches.
Inter‐faith network of
Mann and Dick Powell serve first meal of the Virginia Beach Christian outreach; continues at the Fire Escape on 17th St.
JCOC purchases
1980s
5
70 faith communities join together to push for a shelter in Virginia Beach.
property on Virginia Beach Blvd., providing 10 beds for women and families, and 20 for single men.
OUR CITY
A Brief History of Our Work
1997: Lighthouse Center opens at the Oceanfront.
2005: South d
2006: Gosnold opens in Norfolk, providing 60 units of permanent supportive housing.
2007: City C il d t
2008: Cloverleaf opens in Virginia Beach, providing additional 60 units of permanent supportive housing.
1990‐2000s
6
Hampton Roads Regional Task Force to End Homelessness is formed.
Council adopts 10‐year Plan.
11/1/2011
4
OUR CITY
A Brief History of Our Work
Below: South Bay in Portsmouth (Opened February 2011)
Above: Cloverleaf in Virginia Beach
(Opened November 2008)
7
OUR HOMELESS
How Do We Compare to Other Cities and the U.S. as a Whole?
2010 ‐ Homeless Persons per 10,000 of General Population
140KW
80
100
120
140
160
Virginia Beach (434,922)
Ocean City (167,857)
Ft. Lauderdale (1,759,132)
United States (301,461,533)
Norfolk (236,071)
12VB
14OC
18Ft L
22U.S.
24N
30MB
35SD
37DB
0
20
40
60
Myrtle Beach (501,134)
San Diego (1,297,618)
Daytona Beach (580,076)
Key West (74,024)
8
11/1/2011
5
OUR CITY
Our Vision
“This is our city, they are our homeless, it is our shared responsibility.”
9Pictured: 2009 Faith‐Based Forum; 2010 Regional Conference on Ending Homelessness
• Addressing homelessness is “our shared responsibility”!
• Our system prioritizes the use of resources and uses them efficiently
OUR CITY
Our Vision
• Our community is well‐informed about and supportive of our work
• We are a true community partnership, including regional neighbors, operating a sustainable system that succeeds in getting help to people who need it
• People in need can access our services
• Our work is done according to a philosophy of opportunity and mutual accountability from all
• We see our work to end homelessness in the context of all
• People who become homeless are safely and quickly sheltered and obtain housing in quality facilitiesthat contribute to our city and neighborhoods
other city goals, includingpromoting economic vitality and safe, well‐maintained, quality neighborhoods
10
11/1/2011
6
OUR CITY
Our Overall Goals
1) Prevent homelessness wherever possible
2) Rapidly re‐house people
3) Maintain and expand affordable housing resources
) d h l b l f4) Expand the availability of resources
5) Connect people to needed services
11
• Relocate the Lighthouse Center and provide enhanced day services including a focus on re
OUR CITY
Three‐Year Action Plan
enhanced day services, including a focus on re‐housing and employment
• Reduce encampments and street homelessnessthrough effective outreach and the creation of additional housing
• Create another efficiency apartment building or similar facility
• Enhance and expand our ability to quickly re‐house homeless families.
12
11/1/2011
7
• Upgrade Judeo‐Christian Outreach Center campus on 17th St
OUR CITY
Three‐Year Action Plan
on 17th St.
• Create a regional Healing Place
• Improve efficiency and effectiveness of our overall system through increased coordination, new services that address needs and potential co location ofthat address needs, and potential co‐location of facilities
• Improve monitoring, data collection and reporting for better analysis, understanding and planning
13
Mayors’ Action Challenge unveiled in 2008 at the National League of Cities Congress & Exposition in Florida
OUR CITY
Nation‐Wide Mayors’ Action Challenge
g g p
Challenged Mayors across the country to set goals to ensure thatevery child has:
• Opportunities to learn and grow• A safe neighborhood to call home • A healthy lifestyle and environment• A financially fit family in which to thrive
Mayor Sessoms and the City Council embraced the challenge
We believe that our work to address homelessness is consistent with the Mayors’ Action Challenge
14
11/1/2011
8
OUR HOMELESS
• Causes of Homelessness
• Who Are Our Homeless?
• Counting the Homeless
F t & Fi• Facts & Figures
15
• Financial causes – job loss major expenses including
OUR HOMELESS
Causes of Homelessness
Financial causes job loss, major expenses including health care
• Short or long‐term disability leading to inability to work
• Mental health issues leading to poor choices
• Family break‐up due to various causes
Different causes require different solutions.
16
11/1/2011
9
Not just single adult men and women on the street.
OUR HOMELESS
Who Are Our Homeless?
Also…• Families with children
– A growing part of homeless the population– Less visible – generally in motels, doubled‐up
• Disconnected youth• Disconnected youth – Those exiting the foster care system with nowhere to go– Forced out of childhood home by their own family
Different households require different solutions.17
• We cannot control the causes of homelessness
OUR HOMELESS
About Counting Homelessness
• People move in and out of homelessness on an ongoing basis
• There is not a single number of homeless people that we can house and say we have succeeded
Wh t d t th b t ibl• What we can do: get the best possible understanding of the different needs in our community, and act to address them
18
11/1/2011
10
OUR HOMELESS
Facts & Figures
• 427 people – January 2011 Point‐in‐Time Count, including 92 single adultsincluding 92 single adults
• Summer Count – 125 unsheltered single adults
• 762 homeless children in VB schools during 2010‐2011 school year
• An estimated 4,300 people (1% of the population) could experience an episode of h l ll (C f U b d C ihomelessness annually (Center for Urban and Community
Studies 2010 Report)
• Connection Point: 1,300+ calls for emergency housing assistance, September 2011
19
OUR HOMELESS
2010 ‐Major Effort to Combat Effect of the Recession on Families
Point‐in‐Time Comparisons 2008‐2011
251
218
266
179
233
215
251
245
150
200
250
300
Persons in Homeless Households with Children
Persons in Homeless
20
0
50
100
2008 2009 2010 2011
Persons in Homeless Households without Children
11/1/2011
11
OUR HOMELESS
2010 ‐Major Effort to Combat Effect of the Recession on Families
20112010
DragasGrant
HPRP Funds
$1.5 million in new, one‐time funding
21
2011HUD‐Defined Homeless in VB
427 people
2010HUD‐DefinedHomeless in VB
517 people
Fewer At‐Risk Families Falling into Homelessness
OUR HOMELESS
Housing Affordability Problems for Renters Can Lead to Homelessness
Total Households
(50,750)
Households with Housing Problems
(25,375)
Households with Moderate Cost Burdens
(12,995)
Households with Severe Cost Burdens
48% of total renters are
cost‐burdened
(9,015)
Households with Overcrowding
(1,010)Households with housing condition
issues (450)
22
Source: US Census, American Communities Survey
11/1/2011
12
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
• Progress Made
• What’s In Motion
23
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Progress Made
O 500 h h ld id d ith
A lot has been accomplished since the 10‐Year Plan was adopted in 2007:
• Over 500 households provided with homeless prevention funds
• 73 formerly homeless adults have moved into permanent supportive housing beds (Cloverleaf , JCOC, & other programs)
• 60 HUD‐Veterans Affairs Supportive H i (VASH) h h bHousing (VASH) vouchers have been issued to formerly homeless veterans
• Hundreds of homeless families have been assisted with Dragas and Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re‐housing (HPRP) assistance
24
11/1/2011
13
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Donation Meters & Special Council Funding from 2010
G d $5 000 i hiGenerated $5,000 in sponsorships and $2,032.65 in donations so far
25
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Donation Meters & Special Council Funding from 2010
How You’re Helping ‐ $25,000 you allocated to the program + Donation Meter funds resulted in:
• 1,195 tickets for travel to job and benefits interviews, medical appointments, employment
• Prescriptions for 116 persons
• I.D. cards for 226 persons
• …More detail on this program in an upcoming presentation
26
11/1/2011
14
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
What’s In Motion
Current Planning and Advisory Groups:• BEACH (Bringing an End to All City Homelessness) Community• BEACH (Bringing an End to All City Homelessness) Community
Partnership
— Oceanfront Homeless Advisory/Single Homelessness Committee
— Family Homelessness Committee
— Services Coordination Committee
— Fundraising Committee
— Advocacy CommitteeAdvocacy Committee
• Lighthouse Site Options and Neighborhood Issues Committees
• South Hampton Roads Regional Task Force to End Homelessness
• VBHARP – Continuum of Care planning
• Project HOPE – VB City schools27
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
What’s In Motion
Projects planned or currently being developed:developed:
• Cedar Grove: VBCDC’s 32‐unit apartment complex to serve homeless and/or disabled veterans
• Heron’s Landing: VSH’s 60‐unit SRO in Chesapeake to serve 8 people
• Healing Place: Regional substance abuse The Healing Place ‐ Louisville, KYHealing Place: Regional substance abuse recovery center and program
• 1,000 Homes Campaign: Regional initiative to house the most medically fragile homeless people
g ,
28
11/1/2011
15
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
What’s In Motion
Below: Cedar Grove (Opening 2012)
Above: Heron’s Landing (Opening 2012)
29
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
What’s In Motion
Outreach efforts in place or being planned:
P i t i Ti C t/P j t H l• Point‐in‐Time Count/Project Homeless Connect : annually in January
• Summer Count : Done in August 2011, perhaps annually
• Lighthouse Center Client Survey: in process
C ti P i t ll t f i t• Connection Point – call center for assistance
• Ongoing DHS/PATH Outreach
• Non‐profit and Faith‐based outreach efforts
30Pictured: 2010 Day of Services; Stuff‐a‐Backpack Campaign
11/1/2011
16
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Lighthouse Center Relocation
During 2011…January Proposed vote re: locating Lighthouse Center on Birdneck Rd.
→ community concern about location
Jan. – April Public meetings
March Site Options Committee appointed
May 27 City Manager letter with action plan direction (details to follow)
31
Aug. – Nov. Community input meetings(details on following slides)
Sept. Research report re: best practices for homeless service centers
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Lighthouse Center Relocation
Community Input Meetings*A 3 1st C it Di l M ti @ B h F ll hi Ch hAug. 3 1st Community Dialogue Meeting @ Beach Fellowship Church
78 attendees
Aug. 31 2nd Community Dialogue Meeting @ VB Law Enforcement Training Academy42 attendees
Sep. 14 Core stakeholders meeting re: neighborhood issues
@ EMS Facility30 attendees
Sep. 19 Lighthouse Site Options Committee Meeting
@ VB Municipal Center27 attendees
32
Meeting 27 attendees
Oct. 5 Neighborhood Issues CommitteeMeeting
@ 2nd Police Precinct Facility19 attendees
Nov. 7 Service Provider Meeting re: Expectations for Homeless Clients
*Councilman Uhrin attended a number of these meetings
11/1/2011
17
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Community Input Summary
• Current homeless assistance system and facility l ti i t f t i hb h dlocations impact oceanfront neighborhoods
• Expending funds for a new center without providing new housing options was questioned
• Siting criteria need to be reviewed, including the
33
rationale for location at the resort area
• Provider and city policies should be reviewed closely to determine how they affect neighborhoods
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter
Plan:
Review existing criteria for locating the Lighthouse Center and determine if there are more factors and issues that should be included and if they should be adjusted
R
34
Response:
Criteria were reviewed and results are summarized in this presentation
11/1/2011
18
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter (2)
Plan:
Complete additional research on best practices; obtain more detailed information on the homeless population in Virginia Beach; obtain examples of the location of day service centers in other cities and how they affected service utilization
Response:
35
p
Report is complete and on our website; summer census;
Lighthouse user survey; site visit to Union Mission‐at their new
campus
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter (3)
Plan:Plan:
Identify additional sites, including some outside the Resort Area
Response:
Site identification has continued; pending your guidance
36
f ; p g y gfrom this meeting, site recommendations will be reviewed with the community and Council
11/1/2011
19
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter (4)
Plan:
Establish a functional, high‐quality temporary Lighthouse Center site on city‐owned land north of the current JCOC campus on 17th St.
Response:
37
This option was evaluated but has significant cost and timing issues and therefore alternatives are being sought
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter (5)
Plan:
Establish ongoing dialogue between area residents and JCOC and VOA
Response:
Meetings to discuss community concerns in detail have been held.
38
In addition, staff are meeting with providers to identify potential policy issues to address. This process includes the Police Department, Human Services and DHNP and is ongoing now.
11/1/2011
20
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter (6)
Plan:
Expand the membership of, and hold a limited number of additional meetings of the Lighthouse Site Options Committee
Response:
39
Meetings were held during the summer; additional public
participation did occur
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter (7)
Plan:
Present each of the proposed site options in the context of our overall plan to address homelessness, showing the context and impact of the various options.
Response:
Our presentation today and the report that accompanies it
40
Our presentation today, and the report that accompanies it, presents our overall plan. Based on your guidance, site options that are proposed will be evaluated based on elements of this plan.
11/1/2011
21
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
City Manager’s May 27th Letter (8)
Plan:
Staff to report to City Manager in October; City Manager to make site recommendation
Response:
Site recommendations will follow this report
41
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Lighthouse Relocation Criteria
Recommendations from Lighthouse Site Options Committee
C IdConsensus Ideas • In an industrial or commercial zone, away from residential• Public transit route within 1,000 ft.• Near social services• Near police• Accessible to other providers, resources, employment
opportunities
42
pp
Non‐Consensus• In a central location• Located no more than 1.5 miles from Oceanfront
11/1/2011
22
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Current Homeless Assistance System in the Resort Area
• Made possible through the continuing generosity of p g g g ycommunity members and faith organizations
• Multiple sites in close proximity provide “circuit” of services
• Negative impact of circuit on community
S i f iliti d i t d l ti
43
• Service facilities need improvement and relocation – Lighthouse Center – JCOC
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Research Report
Purpose:u pose
• Provide baseline for comparison of Virginia Beach homeless facilities to those in other resort cities
• Compile list of best practices for homeless service centers
Report available on DHNP website as of September
44
11/1/2011
23
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Research ReportLocalities included in report Other localities reviewed
during research process
• Daytona Beach, FL
• Fort Lauderdale, FL
• Key West, FL
• Myrtle Beach, SC
• Norfolk, VA
• Ocean City MD
• Baltimore, MD
• Dallas, TX
• Oklahoma City, OK
• Phoenix, AZ
• Richmond, VA
• San Antonio, TXOcean City, MD
• San Diego, CA
• Virginia Beach, VA
• Hennepin County (Minneapolis, MN)
• Franklin County (Columbus, OH)
San Antonio, TX
• St Louis, MO
45
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Research ReportConclusions
1) There are only a few cities with day service only centers (such as the1) There are only a few cities with day‐service‐only centers (such as the current Lighthouse Center)
2) Trend toward consolidating full spectrum of services for the homeless (including overnight shelter) into one campus location
3) Homeless‐serving facility can be successfully located away from beach/resort area /
• Housing and/or shelter component necessary• May also require transportation component to bring people to the campus
4) An effective data management system is critical to track outcomes / success rates
46
11/1/2011
24
• Staff and community proposed a combination shelter and h i f ili i 1989 d C il d i
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Our History re: the Campus Model
permanent housing facility in 1989, and Council approved it
• The facility could not be built because of issues with the seller
• The current Lighthouse Center, completed in 1997, was intended to include a shelter; the current day‐services‐only center is the result of a compromise that removed the shelter in order to obtain approval.
• Faith communities have continued to support the Winter Shelter program as a substitute
47
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
What is a Campus Model?• Consolidates multiple complementary services for homeless in one location
– Provides for all/majority of daily needs and offers supportive services
• Guiding philosophy
– Provide a complete continuum of services to facilitate progression out of homelessness, permanently
– Maximize time homeless able to spend on enrichment/development activities
– Minimize burden on homeless having to travel throughout city to obtain multiple services
C i• Campus sizes vary
(can be actual campus or one multi‐use building)
– Haven for Hope, San Antonio – 100 acres
– Union Mission, Norfolk – 24 acres
– Broward County Partnership, Fort Lauderdale – 3.2 acres
48
11/1/2011
25
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Campus Model Example: Union Mission, Norfolk
New Men’s Shelter
4949
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Union Mission: Rendering of Proposed Men’s Overnight Shelter
50
11/1/2011
26
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Daily Bread, Baltimore
51
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
St. Patrick Center, St. Louis
Business Incubator Lobby
52
11/1/2011
27
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Broward Partnership, Fort Lauderdale
53
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Bridge Homeless Center: Dallas, TX
AIA 2009 National Housing Award Winner
Photo: Overland Partners
Photo: Overland Partners
Housing Award Winner
• 3.41 acres
• 75,000 sq. ft.
• Assist approx. 1400 individuals per day
54
11/1/2011
28
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Campus ModelPotential Facilities on a Virginia Beach Homeless Services Campus
• Day services centery
• Short‐term / Emergency shelter or short term housing
– Singles and families– Beds for hospital release
• Specialized services through community providers
– Vocational training/experience– Education programsM di l / d l li i– Medical / dental clinic
• Long‐term housing
• Social detox facility
• City offices (Dept. of Human Services, more…)
• Possible relocation of some Judeo‐Christian Outreach facilities from 17th St.55
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Campus Model
Benefits to the Community(Depending on what services are located on the Campus)
1) Improved results for moving people permanently out of homelessness reduces cost to the community for: – Police– Courts– Jail stays– Emergency room visits /EMS services – Foster care placements– Estimated $20,000+ per person / per year
2) Reduce foot traffic through community of homeless seeking out assistance
3) Provides a service and geographic focus for community support– Funding; Donations; Volunteering
4) Facilitates improved synergy and coordination among multiple city, non‐profit, faith and business community partners 56
11/1/2011
29
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Campus Model
Benefits to the Homeless
1) P id f d bl i1) Provides safe and stable environment
2) Access to services much easier and less costly than traveling to multiple locations throughout city (by walking/biking/bus)
3) Ease of meeting daily needs frees up time to spend addressing barriers to housing– Accelerates opportunity to progress toward permanent
housing situation
57
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Campus Model
Principles for Design and Operation
E ll Si D i• Excellent Site Design– Be a model for good design and sustainability
– Provide flexible spaces to meet changing community needs
– Provide separate spaces for singles and families
• Operational PrinciplesEstablish and enforce guidelines that insure campus is a good neighbor– Establish and enforce guidelines that insure campus is a good neighbor
– Provide continuum of complementary programs to help people progress out of homelessness
58
11/1/2011
30
Campus Model Flow ChartHomelessPopulation
Those at‐risk of Homelessness
Existing Housing ResourcesVouchers
FutureRegional Healing Place
(substance abuse recovery)
VouchersNon‐profit Providers
FaithOrganizations
Permanent Housing Options
Adult Overnight Shelter
Family Overnight Shelter
Off C
Central Intake/Assessment/Referral
59
Day Services
Partner Organizations
Vocational TrainingEducation Programs
More…
Permanent Housing Options
On Campus
Off‐Campus Resources
Track & Measure Outcomes
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Summary
1) We should be proud of the intensive efforts that have been made by the community, city, and region y, y, g• Without them the current Virginia Beach homeless rate would be
higher
2) Must continue to stay ahead of future needs through proactive, long‐range planning
• It takes years to plan, fund and develop quality facilities• JCOC and the Lighthouse Center need upgrading
3) Neighborhood impacts of facilities and services at the resort area should be addressed
4) Streamlining homeless services under a centralized operations structure and campus model will allow us to achieve better outcomes with our existing set of resources
60
11/1/2011
31
OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
What Are We Asking Today?
• Your questions and comments
• Your guidance and feedback on community efforts to reduce homelessness
• Should staff develop a formal proposal for Council to consider that would include site and program optionsconsider that would include site and program options for a homeless services “campus” facility?
61
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME & SUPPORT!Questions, comments, suggestions?
62