Comp Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    1/20

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    2/20

    12-2

    Learning Objectives

    After reading this chapter, you should

    be able to: Discuss how pay influences individual

    employees and describe three theoriesthat explain the effect of compensationon individuals.

    Describe the fundamental pay programsfor recognizing employees contributionsto the organizations success.

    List the advantages and disadvantagesof the pay programs.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    3/20

    12-3

    Learning Objectives

    After reading this chapter, you should

    be able to: Describe how organizations combine incentive

    plans in a balanced scorecard. Discuss issues related to performance-based

    pay for executives.

    Explain the importance of process issues suchas communication in compensation

    management.

    List the major factors to consider in matchingthe pay strategy to the organizations strategy.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    4/20

    12-4

    Introduction

    Organizations have a relatively

    large degree of discretion in

    deciding how to pay.

    Each employees pay is basedupon individual performance,

    profits, seniority, or other factors.

    Regardless of cost differences,

    different pay programs can have

    very different consequences for

    productivity and return on

    investment.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    5/20

    12-5

    How Does Pay Influence IndividualEmployees?

    Three different theories help explain

    compensations effects:

    Reinforcement Theory

    Agency TheoryExpectancy Theory

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    6/20

    12-6

    How Does Pay InfluenceIndividual Employees?

    Reinforcement Theory - A response followedby a reward is more likely to recur in the future.

    Expectancy Theory - Motivation is a function ofvalence, instrumentality, and expectancy.

    Agency Theory -The interests of the principals(owners) and theiragents (managers) may nolonger converge.

    Types of agency costs include:

    perquisites attitudes towards risk

    decision-making horizons

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    7/20

    12-7

    Agency Costs

    Agency costs may be minimized by theprincipal choosing a contracting schemethat helps align the interests of the agent

    with the principal's own interests. The type of contract depends partly on

    the following factors: risk aversion

    outcome uncertainty job programmability

    measurable job outcomes

    ability to pay

    tradition

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    8/20

    12-8

    Programs for RecognizingEmployee Contributions

    Programs differ by payment method, frequency ofpayout, and ways of measuring performance.

    Potential consequences of such programs areperformance motivation of employees, attraction of

    employees, organization culture, and costs. Contingencies that may influence whether a pay

    program fits the situation are management style, andtype of work.

    Merit Pay Incentive Pay

    Gain Sharing Ownership

    Profit SharingSkill-based

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    9/20

    12-9

    Merit Pay

    Merit pay programs link performance-

    appraisal ratings to annual pay

    increases.

    A merit increase grid combines anemployees performance rating with

    the employees position in a pay

    range to determine the size and

    frequency of his or her pay

    increases.

    Some organizations provide

    guidelines regarding the percentage

    of employees who should fall into

    each performance category.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    10/20

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    11/20

    12-11

    Individual Incentives

    Individual incentives reward individual performance,but payments are not rolled into base pay, andperformance is usually measured as physical outputrather than by subjective ratings.

    They are relatively rare because: Most jobs have no physical output measure.

    There are many potential administrative problems.

    Employees may do what they get paid for and nothingelse.

    They typically do not fit in with the team approach. They may be inconsistent with organizational goals.

    Some incentive plans reward output at the expense ofquality or customer service.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    12/20

    12-12

    Profit Sharing

    Underprofit sharing, payments are

    based on a measure of organization

    performance (profits), and payments

    do not become a part of base pay.

    The advantage is that profit sharing

    may encourage employees to think

    more like owners.

    The drawback is that workers may

    perceive their performance has little

    to do with profit but is more related totop management decisions over

    which they have little control.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    13/20

    12-13

    Ownership

    Ownership encourages employees to focus on the

    success of the organization as a whole, but, like

    profit sharing, ownership may be less motivational

    the larger the organization.

    One method to achieve employee ownership is

    through stock options, which give employees the

    opportunity to buy company stock at a previously

    fixed price.

    Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) are

    employee ownership plans that give employers

    certain tax and financial advantages when stock is

    granted to employees.

    ESOPs can carry significant risk for employees.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    14/20

    12-14

    Gainsharing

    Gainsharing programs offer a means ofsharing productivity gains withemployees, and are based on group or

    plant performance that does not becomepart of the employees base salary.

    Conditions that should be in place forgainsharing to be effective include:

    management commitment a need to change or a strong commitment tocontinuous improvement

    management's acceptance andencouragement of employee input

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    15/20

    12-15

    Gainsharing

    Conditions that should be in place forgainsharing to be effective include: high levels of cooperation and interaction

    employment security information sharing on productivity and costs

    goal setting

    commitment of all involved parties to theprocess of change and improvement

    agreement on a performance standard andcalculation that is undesirable, seen as fair,and closely related to managerial objectives

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    16/20

    12-16

    Group Incentives and TeamAwards

    Group incentives tend to

    measure performace in

    terms of physical output

    Team award plans may usea broader range of

    performance measures.

    Drawbacks are that

    individual competition may

    be replaced by competition

    between groups or teams.

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    17/20

    12-17

    Balanced Scorecard

    Some companies find it useful to design a

    mix of pay programs.

    The four categories of a balanced

    scorecard include:

    financial

    customer

    internal

    learning and growth

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    18/20

    12-18

    Managerial and Executive Pay

    Top managers and executives are a strategically

    important group whose compensation warrants

    special attention.

    In some companies rewards for executives arehigh regardless of profitability or stock market

    performance.

    Executive pay can be linked to organizational

    performance (from agency theory).

    There has been increased pressure from

    regulators and shareholders to better link pay

    and performance.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    19/20

    12-19

    Process and Context Issues

    Three issues represent areas of significant

    company discretion and pose opportunities to

    compete effectively:

    Employee Participation

    in DecisionMaking

    Communication

    Pay and Process:

    Intertwined Effects

  • 8/6/2019 Comp Management

    20/20

    12-20

    Matching Pay Strategy andOrganization Strategy

    Pay Strategy Dimensions

    Risk sharing (variable pay)

    Time orientation

    Pay level (short-run)

    Pay level (long-run potential)

    Benefits level

    Centralization of pay decisions

    Pay unit of analysis

    Concentration

    Low

    Short-term

    Above market

    Below market

    Above market

    Centralized

    Job

    Growth

    High

    Long-term

    Below market

    Above market

    Below market

    Decentralized

    Skills

    Organization Strategy