Upload
konstantinos-polemis
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
1/53
,
& , ,
Comparative Study of Different EOR Methods
. (). (). ()
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
2/53
010
1
W P. T A J (NTNU), M. N C (S),
M. L H (S) ,
. W S
H .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
3/53
010
2
Table of contents I .........................................................................................................................................................7
1. R S ..........................................................................................................................................7
1.1 P R ..............................................................................................................................9
1.2 S R ..........................................................................................................................9
2.2.1 W I ...........................................................................................................................10
2.2.2 G I................................................................................................................................11
2.2.3 L P S R P....................12 2.3 T E O R M (EOR)......................................................................13
2.3.1 C ....................................................................................................................14
2.3.2 M ................................................................................................31
2.3.3 T P ......................................................................................................................34
2. T P.................................................................................................................................................36
2.1 B ......................................................................................................................................36
2.2 A E. .............................................................................................................39
2.3 C ..........................................................................................................................46
2.3.1 S EOR ......................................................................................................47
2.4 R..............................................................................................................................................48
3. C................................................................................................................................................51
4. R .................................................................................................................................................52
List of Tables
T 1: W . ................................................................................................................17
T 2: M EOR27
T 3: N R C 6..................................................................................................39
T 4: S EOR 4........................................................................................46
T 5: O EOR . E
ECLIPSE . ...................................................................................................................49
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
4/53
010
3
T 6: N P V EOR
. .............................................................................................................................................49
T 7: P EOR ...........................50
List of Figures
F 1: R ..............................................................7
F 2: S 3...........................................................................................................9
F 3: 2. ........................................................11
F 4: D 2........................................11
F 5: C EOR 2. .................................................................................14
F 6: 7............................................................................................15
F 7: S/P 10
............................................................................................15
F 8: C D ....................................................................16
F 9: W . A , C
. A , C E ..........................................16
F 10: S IFT . F / (0.001 /) 5..............19
F 11: S 6............................................................................20
F 12: T . T
6. .......................................................................................................20
F 13: E IFT 6. ............................................................................20
F 14: D
(IFV) 7........................................................21
F 15: S 7. .....................21
F 16: S 7.22
F 17: S 7................22
F 18: T
7. ....................................................................................................................................23
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
5/53
010
4
F 19: IFT NC
7........................................................................................................................................................................24
F 20: T IFT 7. .....24
F 21: E 6, 12...........................................................................27
F 22: H P MEOR 17.................................................................................................................28
F 23: S
. T
16. .......................................................................................................................................28
F 24: S ,
. T 16. ..............................................29
F 25: M 16......................................................................................................29
F 26: C .................................................................32
F 27: U 3...................................................................................................34
F 28: S 3................................................................................................35
F 29: I C........................................................................................................36
F 30: P , NGL NCS 20072010 A..37
F 31: F N C S 4 ............................37
F 32: S
, . B .....................................................38
F 33: GO E..........................................................................................40
F 34: F G P R E. ..............................................................................40
F 35: F O P R E. ................................................................................41
F 36: F O P T E. ...............................................................................41
F 37: F G P T ..............................................................................................................42
F 38: O F3H...............................................................43
F 39: O F1H...............................................................43
F 40: O .................................................................................44
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
6/53
010
5
F 41: O .................................................................44
F 42: G P T F1H F3H.................................................45
F 43: G P T . ...................................................45
F 44: O EOR M 11 .........................47
F 45: C EOR E. ...................................................................47
F 46: O EOR
..............................................................................................................................................................49
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
7/53
010
6
Abstract
T N C S (NCS)
. T
. T N
.
A
(53%), (EOR)
. S
,
.
D EOR ET N
V. C , EOR (MEOR) CO2 N
R , , .
T
.
A CO 2
. A 67.2%
. H, MEOR S .
T CO2 N R CO2
. C
.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
8/53
010
7
Introduction
T
. T
1, 1 :
1:
: T ,
.
: N .T , , . T
50%.
: T
. U ,
, /
. T 12%
RF .
1. Recovery Stages
A ,
. T
:
1. V : I
(M). T
. M (λ = / )
.
1 Reservoir recovery techniques. Kleppe, Jon. Kompendium, NTNU, autumn 2009. Trondheim, Norway
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
9/53
010
8
W:
= (D)
= (D)
μ & μ = (P)
A . W
, , . I
,
2.
: I . W
, :
F, .
I ,
. V S E, E
E , ( ) (
).
2 Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G., Yen, T.F., & Sharma, M.K.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences: EnhancedOil Recovery; Volume 17B: Processes and Operations; Elsevier B.V.; Amsterdam; 1989; pp (1-9)
agentdisplacingbycontactedoilof Amount
displacedoilof Amount=
D E
placeinoilof amountTotal
fluiddisplacingbycontactedoilof Volume=
V E
I AV E E E •=
area Total
fluiddisplacingbycontactedArea=
A E
areasectional-cross Total
fluiddisplacingbycontactedareasectional-Cross=
I E
o
ro
w
rw
k
k
M
µ
µ =
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
10/53
010
9
2: 3
T
.
I
. T
. T
:
E
G
B
A
A ,
. T ,
.
T ,
. T
. A, ,
. I ,
. T
. C
. P
2.
W
,
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
11/53
010
10
. C
2.
W ,
. T :
T
,
. T , 2.
2.2.1 Water Injection
I ,
. T
. I ,
. U
. T
. T
.
W :
1) F ( ).
2) T ,
.
T
() ().
T , , :
• R .
• C .
A . W
W . T
. F
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
12/53
010
11
3 4 ,
.
3: 2.
4: D 2.
2.2.2 Gas Injection
I . T
1864 D .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
13/53
010
12
T
. R
, ,
.
I , ( )
. G . G
. T
.
T
. I
. I ,
. A ,
; ,
.
I
. T
. T
.
2.2.2.1 Identifying a gas injection candidate
O
. F
. I
,
.
I ,
. R
, .
I
, .
2.2.3 Limitations and disadvantages of Primary and Secondary
Recovery Processes
• R
(5 10 % ).
• S ( / ) :
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
14/53
010
13
R
U
W
L 3
?
A EOR
:
A
F
M
C
C
C
3.
T
. B EOR
. I
( ), ( ). E
CO2 . I , EOR
4.
T 20 50 %
. T
. T .
T EOR
,
. T EOR :
C
T
M 2
3 Prof. Ole Torsæter, Kompendiu, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
4 Technology Strategy for Enhanced Recovery; OG21
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
15/53
010
14
T EOR , 5 EOR
.
2.3.1 Chemical processes
T
. T EOR . C
:
• S
• P
• C
I , ASP (ASP) . T
. . T
5. C
. T
. T
.
5: C 2.
5 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Chemicals and Formulations; Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry; 2006; pp (1-6).
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
16/53
010
15
T EOR .
6: 7.
I N C S
(WAG) , EOR
.
7: / 10
T
EOR. R , ,
. A
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
17/53
010
16
,
. D ,
( ) ( )
6. T
( ), ( )
C N.
σ
κ
L
P N
C
∆=
*
W ΔP/L σ 5.
I
, . I
. D ()
5.
. T ()
. C
. T (θ)
. T
. T ,
. T,
8.A ,
. T
7.
8: C D
9: . A , C
. A , C
6 Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G. & Yen, T.F.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences: Enhanced Oil Recovery;
Volume 17A: Fundamentals and Analyses; Elsevier B.V.; Amsterdam; 1989; pp (54-59)7 http://www.statoil.com/en/OurOperations/TradingProducts/CrudeOil/Crudeoilassays/Pages/Norne.aspx
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
18/53
010
17
Strength of:
Contactangle Degree ofwetting Solid/Liquidinteractions
Liquid/Liquidinteractions
θ = 0 Perfect wetting strong weak
strong strong0 < θ <90°
high wet-abilityweak weak
90° ≤ θ < 180°
low wet-ability weak strong
θ = 180°perfectly non-
wettingweak strong
1: 8
S .
2.3.1.1 Surfactant Flooding
T
. B ,
.
S (90 400 ) , 25
30% 9 27 S3
8. I
, . F N S
. B
, ,
.
A ,
. T
. B ,
. T
.
N R . O
. I
,
. T
8 “Recent Advances in Improved Oil Recovey Methods for North Sea Sandstone Reserviors”. Kleppe, Jon,
Skjæveland, Svein. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Stavanger, 1992.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
19/53
010
18
, ,
5.
B
103
/, 1020 % ,
,
EOR 5.
A :
. D ,
:
1. T
; IFT, , .
2. : T
.
3. T
4. T .
5. /
6.
7. /
W , . D ,
()
. T
IFT . F EOR
IFT
6.
. O
. I
,
. T
, ,
5.
T 2030 /
104
/,
1020 % , ,
EOR 5.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
20/53
010
19
10: .
/ (0.001 /) 5.
T EOR :
F C
A
E
O
A .
T, , ,
5.
2.3.1.1.1 Working mechanism of surfactant molecule to reduce IFT
W ,
. D ,
()
. T
IFT . F EOR
IFT
6.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
21/53
010
20
11: 6.
12: .
6.
13: 6.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
22/53
010
21
T
. T
7.
14: D
() 7.
15: 7.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
23/53
010
22
16: 7.
P ( )
. T
,
. T
()
. A (, )
EOR. S (NOH)
14.
17: 7.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
24/53
010
23
IFT
IFT . B
, IFT .
18: 7.
A
IFT. A ,
IFT. T
. S
IFT.
T 7.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
25/53
010
24
19: C 7.
20: 7.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
26/53
010
25
F ,
. L
, ,
. M
. M
7.
2.3.1.2 Polymer FloodingP . I
, N S . T
. T
. T . T ,
, , ,
τ, ,
−=
τ µ
t P
exp*
I . A , ,
, .
G :
I R
A , M
. I ,
6.
P ,
, . P
:
T ,
T
T
6.
P
A
M
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
27/53
010
26
P, .. 6
N S :
H
H
L (
)
T 6.
2.3.1.2.1 Miceller-polymer flooding technology
I /
/
:1) P IFT.
2) S .
3) P
4) T: I
.
5) C
6.
2.3.1.3 Microbial EOR Methods (MEOR)
T MEOR
( ) . MEOR
(, .). C
. O 122.
T :
1) CO2 E
2) S /
3) A
4) C 6
P :
R IFT (, , )
S
R 6
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
28/53
010
27
N
S
P
21: 6, 12.
A , ,
.
T :
1) M
;
2) D
.
2: 16.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
29/53
010
28
MEOR 16.
W, :
1)
H
2) M
I ,
. D , . T
, , CO2. T 16.
22: 17.
23:
.
16.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
30/53
010
29
24: ,
. 16.
M 25:
25: 16.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
31/53
010
30
2.3.1.3.1 Limitations of MEOR
W :
1) I .2) P, , , H .
3) S , ,
.
4) M P H2S SO2 ,
.
B
EOR 17.
2.3.1.3.2
Economics of MEOR
M .
C .
I .
E .
T MEOR 2 3 $/bbl [17].
2.3.1.4 Issues related with chemical processes
.
&
4.
4.
4, 6
.
. . ,
,
5. .
, ,
6.
6.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
32/53
010
31
2.3.2 Miscible displacement methods
T
. D, , CO2, , , . M
, .
I , ,
, ED, . P
, , ,
. W ,
. T
/
. I (IFT) . I
, .
I , ,
. F
, ()
, .
V FCM
MCM . T , ,
CO2, , . T , , .
2.3.2.1 CO2 Flooding
T CO2 1985 . I
.
W , C
D . I
2,000 ., CO2 , API 2225 20%. I
C
. C
CO2 ,
.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
33/53
010
32
26: C .
I CO2 ,
. T
( )
CO2 . O ,
CO2 . T CO2
. T
. N CO2
. T W C
.
CO2
. I , CO2
.
F CO2, . T :
• I • I
• C CO2.
• I
• W
•
I , CO2 . D
. I :
1) C
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
34/53
010
33
2) I CO23) E .
T , , / :
( )
c
c
o
o
co
c
k k
u µ µ
α ρ ρ
−
−=
sin0439.0
W /3, P, ,
, .
P
. A CO2 .
P CO2.
CO2 . T CO2
. E
. I ,
8% CO2 . T CO2
, CO2, ,
.
2.3.2.2 Inert Gas Flooding
T
. P :
• P ()
• I .
•
T
:
1) P
2) I
3) M (
). N ( ) .
T . O :,
P .
H
R .
R .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
35/53
010
34
2.3.3 Thermal Processes
W ( 20 API),
, . F , . T
. D
, :
• I
• S
2.3.3.1 Steam Injection
S . C ,
. S
. F , 2550%
. T
10 11.
27: 3.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
36/53
010
35
28: 3
2.3.3.2 In Situ Combustion
F I :
W
D O
D C: T ,
. A ,
.
P
, ,
.
W C: I ,
. T
. I , . S . T
,
10.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
37/53
010
36
29: C.
2. The Project
T
,
. D , ,
, , 4.
T N C S (NCS)
. T
, NPD, 800 S3
(
) 2015. E O R (EOR)
4.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
38/53
010
37
30: , C 20072010 A
T NCS 46%
. T
, 15.
T ,
, WAG ,
. H, ,
,
4.
NPD’s prognosis for oil production fromexisting fields, discoveries and prospects
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
m i l l S m 3 o i l / y e a r
Oil Reserves
Inproved
RecoveryDiscoveries
NPD's goal:
800 mill Sm³ (5 bill bbl)
of increased oil reserves
by 2015
Undiscovered oil
31: C 4
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
39/53
010
38
32:
, . B
T :
• U (
).
• O (
).
T ,
. A , ,
70% .
A , , ,
. I
,
2.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
40/53
010
39
A , 2,
EOR .
C
A 32.7
0.8619 2530%
0.21
%
503000
D
9 C 273
14.06 S 98 C
111
S3/S
3
3: C 6
L, E N E
. D
.
• O .
• C
•
C F1H.• C F3H.
T , .
M , .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
41/53
010
40
33: .
34: .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
42/53
010
41
35: .
36: .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
43/53
010
42
37:
I
. T :
• T O ( 2010)
. T
EOR
. T
,
EOR . A T
.
• T
, 38, 41 42.• T, GO 20% .
• A 37, 38 39, I F3H
10% F1H.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
44/53
010
43
38: 3.
39: 1.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
45/53
010
44
40: .
41: .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
46/53
010
45
42: 1 3.
43: .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
47/53
010
46
A ECLIPSE ,
EOR .
S 3.
4: 10
A :
• CO2
/ .
• T CO2 .
• S
.
• S/
/ . 10
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
48/53
010
47
2.3.1 Selection of an EOR method
T EOR
, , , ( & ) . 2
N 45 46
EOR
, .
44: 11
45: C .
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
49/53
010
48
T, EOR
. T :
1)
CO2
2) S
F ET 9
. T
.
A ,
( ). B
2019 CO2 .
T 3 46
ECLIPSE
.
W
(S3/)
S
(S3/)
CO2
F
(S3
/)
2010 19000 22420 20900
2011 18250 21535 20075
2012 16800 19824 18480
2013 16500 19470 18150
2014 15000 17700 16500
2015 15100 17818 16610
2016 14300 16874 15730
2017 13900 16402 15290
2018 13500 15930 14850
9 Norne excel spreadsheet for economical evaluation.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
50/53
010
49
2019 12100 14278 13310
5: .
C .
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
year
s m 3 / d a y WI
WI w/surf
WI w/ CO2
46: .
F ,
12. A
( ), :
NPV MMNOK
M
B T A T
W 98 685 25 658
S 115 277 29 958
CO2 107 570 27 957
6: .
T , ET
10
. F 6. B
95 000 000 311
10 Gullfaks Village 2010. Gullfaks Sør Omega Project, some cost data and economic assumptions.
11 Statoil field development report Norne 2004
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
51/53
010
50
M T C
(3/)
%
W 2010 50 350 000 53%W 2019 61 610 000 64.8%
W
/2019 63 073 800 66.3%
CO2 2019 63 862 000 67.2% 7: .
T , CO 2
.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
52/53
010
51
3. Conclusions
A :
S N
N , .
C . H,
90%
. T,
. I
. H
.
M EOR .
CO2
.
M EOR . S
( , ) ;
510 . T
EOR
. O
.
H . A
.
D
ECLIPE . T
.
T EOR
. I
.
8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.
53/53
010
4. References[1] Reservoir Recovery Techniques. Kleppe, Jon. Kompendium. NTNU, autumn 2009.
Trondheim, Norway.[2]Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G., Yen, T.F., & Sharma, M.K.; Developments in Petroleum
Sciences: Enhanced Oil Recovery; Volume 17B: Processes and Operations; Elsevier B.V.;
Amsterdam; 1989; pp (1-9)
[3] Prof. Ole Torestor Lecture slides of Petroleum Engineering Basic Course
[4] Technology Strategy for Enhanced Recovery; OG21
[5] Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Chemicals and Formulations; Akzo Nobel Surface
Chemistry; 2006; pp (1-6).
[6] Zolotukhin, A.B. & Ursin, J.R.; Introduction to Petroleum Reservoir Engineering; 1st edition;
Hoyskole Forlaget AS Norwegian Academic Press; Kristiansand, Norway; 2000; pp (315-355)
[7] Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G. & Yen, T.F.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences:
Enhanced Oil Recovery; Volume 17A: Fundamentals and Analyses; Elsevier B.V.; Amsterdam;
1989; pp (54-59)
[8] Butt, H.J., Graf, K. & Kappl, M.; Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces; Wiley-VCH;
Weinheim, Germany; 2003
[9]http://www.statoil.com/en/OurOperations/TradingProducts/CrudeOil/Crudeoilassays/Pages/N
orne.aspx
[10] Green, D.W & Willhite, G.P.; Enhanced Oil Recovery; Society of Petroleum Engineers;
Texas; 1998; pp (1-2)
[11] J:J: Taber, F.D.Martin, R.S.Seight: "EOR screening criterioa revisited-Part1", SPEReservoir Engineering, August 1997.
[12] Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G. & Yen, T.F.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences:
Enhanced Oil Recovery; Volume 22: Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery; Elsevier B.V.;
Amsterdam; 1989
[13] http://www.npd.no/en/news/Production-figures/2010/January-2010/
[14] http://www.npd.no/en/topics/improved-recovery/temaartikler/why-do-we-not-recover-100-
per-cent-of-the-oil/
[15] http://www.heavyoilinfo.com/feature_items/thai/expert-viewpoint-2013-thai-in-situ-
combustion.
[16] M. M. Schumcher; Enhanced Recovery of Residual and Heavy Oil; 2nd
edition; Noyes Data
Corporation; Park Ridge, New Jersey, USA;1980; pp.32-64
[18] Presentation on ‘Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery’ at University of Cairo