Upload
mohit-prasad
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/19/2019 Comparative Table 7 Pm Sun 10-May-2015
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-table-7-pm-sun-10-may-2015 1/4
1
Comparative Table Of Candidates Qualified For JudicialService Exams Of Other States (All general category students. Reserved students list awaited).
After analysing candidates selected in 11 states judicial exams, we
have the following lists of sitting judges who couldn’t qualify theDelhi mains.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Rank 1 UP, Aishwarya Pratap Singh
• Rank 1 Himachal Anuj Bahal
• Rank 1 Uttarkhand Ashutosh Tiwari
• Rank 1 Orissa Isha Paty
• Rank 1 Gujarat Shantanu Tyagi• Rank 1 Rajasthan Madan Singh Chaudhary
• Rank 2 Haryana Asmita Deswal
• Rank 2 Punjab Harsimranjeet Kaur
Also, Students who cleared 2 states but couldn’t even passDelhi mains:
• Nahid Sultana - cleared Jharkhand and UP• Shivdan Choudhary - cleared Gujarat and Rajasthan
• Akanksha Garg – cleared UP and Rajasthan
Total number of sitting judges from neighbouring states whocouldn’t clear Delhi mains – 72
The 11 states analyzed are:
1. Haryana2. Punjab3. Himachal Pradesh4. UP5. MP6. Uttrakhand7. Bihar8. Jharkhand
9. Rajasthan10. Odisha11. Gujarat
ALL THESETOPPERSDID NOTEVENQUALIFYTOAPPEAR INTHE DJS
INTERVIEW
8/19/2019 Comparative Table 7 Pm Sun 10-May-2015
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-table-7-pm-sun-10-may-2015 2/4
2
Name Rank in thestatewhereselected
DelhiJudicialService(Mains)Roll No.
DJSMainsExamScore
Qualified inDJS mains ornot
Odisha1. Isha Paty 1 594 364 Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Himachal Pradesh Not Qualified
2. Anuj Bahal 1 460 321 Not Qualified
Uttarkhand
3. Ashutosh Tiwari 1 514 364 Not Qualified4. Meenal Chawla 2 228 389 Not Qualified
5. Tista Shah 3 539 336 Not Qualified
6. Abhay Singh 12 620 386.5 Not Qualified
7. Mohammad Arif 13 121 308 Not Qualified
Jharkhand
8. Shikha Agrawal 4 548 303 Not Qualified
9. Shivendu Dwivedi 5 628 310 Not Qualified
10. Tanvee 7 385 334 Not Qualified
11. Arpit Shrivastava 8 599 353 Not Qualified
12. Nahid Sultana 17 281 332 Not Qualified
13. Tabinda Khan 28 387 348 Not Qualified
14. AbhishekSrivastava
36 536 354 Not Qualified
15. Dev Kumar 37 194 255.5 Not Qualified
16. Vivek Jain 47 217 374 Not Qualified
17. Manish KumarMishra
55 344 327 Not Qualified
18. Ranjay Kumar 56 266 355 Not Qualified
Haryana19. Asmita Deswal 2 170 394 Not Qualified
20. Nishant Garg 7 273 392 Not Qualified
21. Prateet SinghDhonchak
14 441 333 Not Qualified
22. Aparna Chaudhary 15 495 365 Not Qualified
23. Gurdeep Kaur 20 327 367 Not Qualified
24. Vivek Kumar Agarwal
21 425 360 Not Qualified
25. Avinash Yadav 22 51 331 Not Qualified
26. Mansi Gaur 25 452 271 Not Qualified
27. Vinamrata Chawla 29 525 402 Not Qualified
28. Vishesh Garg 32 330 355 Not Qualified
29. Amit Nain 37 227 344 Not Qualified
MP
30. Kumar Rahul 8 589 394 Not Qualified
Gujrat
31. Shantanu Tyagi 1 479 351 Not Qualified32. Amod kanth 2 553 380 Not Qualified
33. Shivdan Choudhary 12 486 322 Not Qualified
34. Neetu Sharma 25 155 275 Not Qualified
8/19/2019 Comparative Table 7 Pm Sun 10-May-2015
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-table-7-pm-sun-10-may-2015 3/4
3
35. Vasundhra Kapur 28 517 289 Not Qualified
Bihar
36. Deepender singhshekhawat
18 513 337 Not Qualified
37. Manish Kumar 33 196 363 Not Qualified
Rajasthan
38. Madan SinghChaudhary
1 258 331 Not Qualified
39. Ankur Gupta 27 423 317 Not Qualified
40. Akanksha Garg 28 530 251 Not Qualified
41. Rinku Kumar 32 413 226 Not Qualified
42. Ankita Singhal 43 269 335 Not Qualified43. Gopal Krishan 55 154 352 Not Qualified
44. Harsh Kumar 68 289 300 Not Qualified
45. Neha Pandey 71 474 297 Not Qualified
46. Neha Priya 74 222 431 Not Qualified
47. Shikha Singhal 80 492 280 Not Qualified
48. Sanjeev Kumar 82 156 252 Not Qualified
49. Shivdan Choudhary 105 486 322 Not Qualified
UP
50. Aishwarya PratapSingh
1 505 386 Not Qualified
51. Saurabh Srivastava 5 284 300 Not Qualified
52. Nahid Sultana 10 281 332 Not Qualified
53. Bhavya Tiwari 12 286 279 Not Qualified
54. Sakshi Garg 14 605 304 Not Qualified
55. Vinod Sharma 20 56 323 Not Qualified
56. Shivendra KumarMishra
26 253 257 Not Qualified
57. MohammadTauseef Raza
43 297 283 Not Qualified
58. Amit Singh 45 540 244 Not Qualified59. Priyanka Singh 46 118 317 Not Qualified
60. Amit Mishra 49 102 272 Not Qualified
61. Farha Jameel 50 438 353 Not Qualified
62. Samarth Agrawal 53 346 358 Not Qualified63. Shreya Bhargava 55 534 330 Not Qualified
64. SudhanshuShekhar Upadhyay
60 63 347 Not Qualified
65. Akanksha Garg 61 530 251 Not Qualified
Punjab
66. Harsimranjeet Kaur 2 523 335 Not Qualified
67. Rinku Jain 26 373 406 Not Qualified
68. Gagandeep Goyal 31 508 358 Not Qualified69. Ravinder Pal Singh 45 151 317 Not Qualified
70. Vikas Garg 46 46 310 Not Qualified
71. Rahul Miglani 50 239 321 Not Qualified
72. Manjinder Singh 52 283 326 Not Qualified
73. Neenu Rani 55 75 247 Not Qualified
74. Jatinder Pal Singh 67 83 268 Not Qualified
75. Binni Mittal 68 186 262 Not Qualified
8/19/2019 Comparative Table 7 Pm Sun 10-May-2015
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-table-7-pm-sun-10-may-2015 4/4
4
NB:The detailed names and years of the state exams are as follows:
1. Odisha Judicial Service Examination, 20132. Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service Examination, 20143. Uttrakhand Judicial Service Civil Judge (Junior Division) Examination, 20134. Jharkhand Judicial Service Civil Judge (Junior Division) Examination, 20135. HCS(JB) Examination-2012-13 – Haryana6. Madhya Pradesh Civil Judge Class -2 (Entry Level) Exam 2013
7. Gujarat State Judicial Services exam 20128. 28th Bihar Judicial Service Exam 20129. Rajasthan Judicial Service Exam 201310. UP Judicial services (civil judge) (Jr. Div.) Exam.-201311. PCS(JB)-2013-14 – Punjab
Furthermore, Some people were selected in multiple places like Nahid Sultana (Rank 10 in UP andrank 17 in Jharkhand), Shivdan Choudhary (Rank 12 in Gujarat and Rank 105 in Rajasthan) and Akanksha Garg (Rank 28 in Rajasthan and Rank 61 in Uttar Pradesh ) as a result the effective numberis about 72 give or take a few. Also this is right now only including the general seats and not thereserved ones. For both the lists, the work has been delegated and we are waiting for it.