18
HOUR 2 COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS

COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

H O U R 2

COMPARATIVE

RELIGIONS

Page 2: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

REVIEW OF THE

ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

Understanding the “Western” Religions

• Created by God in our original home: the Garden.

• Expelled by God due to our decision to eat the fruit of the tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

• Emphasis on living our lives or transforming ourselves in a way to restore our relationship with God.

Page 3: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

UNDERSTANDING

ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD

Armstrong’s God

• God as neither male or female .

• God is not a being.

• God not necessarily as creator or first cause, but “God beyond God”.

Issues

• “He” inherently places men more sacred.

• “Being” inherently makes people more sacred.

• Creates a limited idol that divides people into fundamentalists and atheists.

Where do you think this understanding comes from? Why do some people believe otherwise?

Page 4: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

ABRAHAMIC RELIGION:INTERPRETATIONS

Key ConceptsGod/Allah, Heaven, Peace

Covenant, Faith, Compassion

• God created us in the perfect garden.

• Banished us after eating the fruit of the knowledge of Good & Evil.

• Emphasis on living our lives or transforming ourselves in a way to restore our relationship with God

1. Spiritual/Metaphysical Truths?

• A spiritual world exists beyond our material world

• We can access it & God for guidance and help.

• Goal: to re-establish relationship with metaphysical God. Enter into Heaven.

Page 5: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

ABRAHAMIC RELIGION:INTERPRETATIONS

2. Physical/Cosmological Truths?

• We all physically come from the same source or same place.

• Primitive life was literally “perfect” until brain developed “ego” & capacity for judgment.

• Goal: for return to this “paradise” of consciousness, environmental harmony.

Key ConceptsGod/Allah, Heaven, Peace

Covenant, Faith, Compassion

• God created us in the perfect garden.

• Banished us after eating the fruit of the knowledge of Good & Evil.

• Emphasis on living our lives or transforming ourselves in a way to restore our relationship with God

Page 6: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

ABRAHAMIC RELIGION:INTERPRETATIONS

3. Philosophical Truths?• Guide for ethics: golden rule.

• Meaningful/purposeful living: living for something greater than oneself.

• Goal: ethical & meaningful living.

Key ConceptsGod/Allah, Heaven, Peace

Covenant, Faith, Compassion

• God created us in the perfect garden.

• Banished us after eating the fruit of the knowledge of Good & Evil.

• Emphasis on living our lives or transforming ourselves in a way to restore our relationship with God

Page 7: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

ABRAHAMIC RELIGION:INTERPRETATIONS

4. Psychological Truths?• Psychological truths of the mind.

• How to deal with interpersonal conflict (faith) and group dynamics (kindness, compassion),

• Goal: inner and outer peace.

Key ConceptsGod/Allah, Heaven,

Covenant, Faith, Compassion

• God created us in the perfect garden.

• Banished us after eating the fruit of the knowledge of Good & Evil.

• Emphasis on living our lives or transforming ourselves in a way to restore our relationship with God

Page 8: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

ABRAHAMIC RELIGION:INTERPRETATIONS

4. Psychological Truths?• Creation story as the story of

human development.

• Goal: wholeness and unity.

Key ConceptsGod/Allah, Heaven, Peace

Covenant, Faith, Compassion

• God created us in the perfect garden.

• Banished us after eating the fruit of the knowledge of Good & Evil.

• Emphasis on living our lives or transforming ourselves in a way to restore our relationship with God

Page 9: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

THE COURSE (IN GENERAL)

Comparing ReligionsWhat we Will Learn About them?

1. How they Make Sense of The World and Our Place in It.

2. What they Say About How to Best Live our Lives.

Page 10: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

WORLD RELIGIONS

Page 11: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

6 Common Approaches

1. New Atheism:

“They are wrong. I don’t believe because they are

not true.”

• Why would this be a useful approach?

• Why might this not be useful?

Page 12: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

6 Common Approaches

2. Agnosticism:

“I don’t believe because I don’t know.”

• Why would this be a useful approach?

• Why might this not be useful?

Page 13: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

6 Common Approaches

3. Religious Exclusivism:

“I believe only one religion is correct and all

others are mistaken.”

Page 14: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

3. Religious Exclusivism

• Often the position taken by religious fundamentalist.

• What does fundamentalism mean?

• What religions have fundamentalist sects?

• Can fundamentalism be associated with atheism?

• Why is fundamentalism on the rise?• Rapid globalization and rise of secular world.• Armstrong: Emphasis on logos rather than mythos.

• Why would this be a useful approach?• Why might this not be useful?

Page 15: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

6 Common Approaches

4. Religious Inclusivism:

“I believe only one religion is fully correct

and all others are partially correct.”

Page 16: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

4. Religious Inclusivism:

• All (or almost all) major religions have partial truths.

• All (or almost all) major religions “point” to the same ultimacy.

• A religion currently exists (or can exist) that encompasses the full truth.

• Why do some see this as form of exclusivism?

• Why would this be a useful approach?

• Why might this not be useful?

Page 17: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

6 Common Approaches

5. Religious Relativism:

“I believe each religion can be considered true for its

believers. There’s no objective way to discuss

whether religious beliefs are true or false.”

• What does this mean?

• Why would this be a useful approach?

• Why might this not be useful?

Page 18: COMPARATIVE RELIGIONS...UNDERSTANDING ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: GOD Armstrong’s God • God as neither male or female . • God is not a being. • God not necessarily as creator or first

APPROACHES TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY

6 Common Approaches

6. Religious Pluralism:

“I believe each major religion is correct. We can

all acknowledge differences, while still co-

existing in society.”

• What does this mean? How can this be possible?