18
Comparing mitigation efforts between Annex 1 Parties Initial results (excl. LULUCF) Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Comparing mitigation efforts between Annex 1 Parties Initial results (excl. LULUCF) Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Comparing mitigation efforts between Annex 1 Parties Initial results (excl. LULUCF)

Fabian WagnerInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Overview:

1. Marginal cost and total costs

2. Sensitivity to• Interest rate• Energy Prices

3. Co-benefits

4. Conclusions

Baseline GHG emissions projections

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

1990 2005 2020Yea r

Em

issi

on

s re

lati

ve t

o 1

990

A us tralia

New Z ealand

Canada

Norw ay

United S tates of A meric a

S w itz erland

J apan

A nnex-I

EU27

Rus s ian Federation

Ukraine

Analysis not completed yet for: Belarus, Croatia, Turkey, Cyprus, Malta

Annex I - 2020marginal abatement cost curve

+7% +2% -3% -10% -13%

200

100

0

-100

-200 +3% -2% -7% -13% -17%

Eur/tCO2eqRel. to 2005

Rel. to1990Annex I 2020Interest rate: 20%

Resulting total mitigation costs: Annex 1 in 2020

-0.05%

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

0.30%

0.35%

0.40%

-20%-15%-10%-5%0%5%

E missions re la tive to 1990

To

tal

cost

(sh

are

of

GD

P20

20)

Interest rate: 20%

Marginal cost curves for individual Parties

Japan

United States of America

EU27

Norway

Interest rate: 20%

Total cost curves for individual Parties

-0.2%

-0.1%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

-60%-40%-20%0%20%40%60%

E mis s ions re lativ e to 1990

To

tal c

ost

(s

har

e o

f GD

P20

20)

Aus tralia

Total cost curves for individual Parties

-0.2%

-0.1%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

-60%-40%-20%0%20%40%60%

E mis s ions re lativ e to 1990

To

tal c

ost

(s

har

e o

f GD

P20

20)

Aus tralia Ukraine

Total cost curves for individual Parties

-0.2%

-0.1%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

-60%-40%-20%0%20%40%60%

E mis s ions re lativ e to 1990

To

tal c

ost

(s

har

e o

f GD

P20

20)

Aus tralia New Zealand C anada

Norway United S tates of Americ a S witz erland

J apan E U27 R us s ian F ederation

Ukraine

Sensitivity analyses

• Alternative interest rates

• Alternative oil prices

• Baseline activity projections

Marginal costs for different interest ratesAnnex 1, 2020, excl. LULUCF

Interest rate 20% Interest rate 4%

200

-20% emissions

130

-20% emissions

Total costs for different interest ratesAnnex 1, 2020, excl. LULUCF

-0.2%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

-25%-20%-15%-10%-5%0%5%10%

E missions re la tive to 1990

To

tal

cost

(%

of

GD

P20

20)

20%

10%

4%

Total cost curves for individual Parties

-0.2%

-0.1%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

-60%-40%-20%0%20%40%60%

E mis s ions re lativ e to 1990

To

tal c

ost

(s

har

e o

f GD

P20

20)

Aus tralia New Zealand C anada

Norway United S tates of Americ a S witz erland

J apan E U27 R us s ian F ederation

Ukraine Annex I 2020Interest rate: 20%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

-25%-15%-5%5%15%25%35%

Australia Canada EU27

Japan New Zealand Norway

Russian Federation Switzerland Ukraine

United States of America Annex-I

Emissions for individual Parties at zero total cost

Inte

rest

rat

e

Emissions relative to 1990

-3.5% -15%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

-25%-15%-5%5%15%25%35%

Australia Canada EU27

Japan New Zealand Norway

Russian Federation Switzerland Ukraine

United States of America Annex-I

Emissions for individual Parties at zero total cost

Inte

rest

rat

e

Emissions relative to 1990

Sensitivity to energy prices

-0.2%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

-25%-20%-15%-10%-5%0%5%10%

E missions re la tive to 1990

To

tal

cost

(%

of

GD

P20

20)

110$/barrel (WE O2008)

83$/barrel

Annex I 2020Interest rate: 20%

Co-control of air pollutant emissions

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

-15%-10%-5%0%5%

G HG emis s ions (relative to 1990)

Em

issi

on

s A

ir P

ollu

tan

ts

rela

tive

to

Bas

elin

e 20

20

S O 2NO XP M2.5

Annex I 2020Interest rate: 20%

Conclusions

• Significant differences in mitigation potentials between countries

• Interest rate is important for costing, but does not change rank orderbetween Parties

• Considerable mitigation potential (-15%) fromnegative cost measures for a 4% interest rate.

• In 2020, a 20% GHG reduction relative to 1990 for Annex 1 can be achieved at a marginal cost of

• 130 €/t CO2eq (at 4% interest rate)

• 200 €/t CO2eq (at 20% interest rate)