COMPLIANCE, RESISTANCE AND INCIPIENT RESPONDING TO DIRECTIVES

Kristiana Tri Utami 11 002 090

Adapt from: Alexandra Kent

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

The journal is discuss about the study by using conversation analysis in a family members delivering

and responding to directive actions during family mealtime conversations. In a familly the power and authority between parents and children are actually

happen in real life.

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Compliance

Is the default response to directive actions without verbal comment.

The recipient obey the directive instructions.

In the example there is a conversation among Emily, Mum and Jess.

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

ResistanceRecipients can refuse to comply the instructions to get them to do something.

In the example there is a conversation among Dad, Jess, Mum and Emily.

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Incipient complianceSchegloff (1989) suggests that the preferred response following a directive is either a compliant action, or some behavioural indication that such an action or course of action is being launched. He describes actions that indicate future compliance as incipient compliance. He distinguishes incipient compliance from full compliance on the grounds that the recipient “does not actually go on to comply at this point” despite performing preparatory actions. Incipient compliance takes the form of actions that can be completed as a precursor to compliance or as part of getting ready to comply.

7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

CONCLUSIONCompliance, resistance and incipient compliance is kinds of responding that usually happen in an conversation when the recipients get some directives from the speakers. Sometimes use by a parent get a child to do something.From the explanation above we can conclude that compliance is the internationally preferred than the other else response to directives (resistance and incipient compliance).

9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Thanks!!

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10