Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A New Way Forward
Comprehensive Asset Management & StructuresComprehensive Asset Management & Structures NYSDOT’s Capital Planning Approach for the Future
Roderic Sechrist Assistant CommissionerB i K ll R6 RD & SSMT C Ch iBrian Kelly R6 RD & SSMT Co-Chair
New York State Department of Transportation
October, 2012
1
Transportation essential to a vibrant economy d i bl iand sustainable society
130 billion vehicle miles 130 billion vehicle miles annuallyannuallyannuallyannually
485 public and private aviation facilities 485 public and private aviation facilities
12 major public and private ports12 major public and private ports
Transportation is at a critical crossroads
Deteriorating and aging infrastructureinfrastructure
NYS has some of the oldest and heavily utilized systems in the nation
Given the significant needs of our
nationHarsh weather conditions accelerate deterioration
transportation system, it is essential that we invest in aLess federal and state
resourcesLess gas tax revenues and
that we invest in a way that produces the greatest possible Less gas tax revenues and
reduced purchasing powerFederal Highway Trust FundState fund debt service
return on investment.
State fund debt service
Resources are diminishing while demands are increasing
In response, NYSDOT is p ,changing its investment
strategies to maximize public benefits while being g
affordable over the long term.4
NYSDOT Asset Management FrameworkNew Framework Established ToNew Framework Established To:
Generate Consistent Decision‐makingmaking
Set Targets/ Performance Metrics
Ensure AccountabilityEnsure Accountability
Guide Local and Regional Decisions for Preservation of the System
Make Centralized Decisions for All Projects Beyond Preservation
Manage Expectations
Ensure Best Investment Regardless of Ownershipof Ownership
5
Forward Four Guiding Principles
Invest for the futureOur program establishes strategic and deliberate decisions that support our transportation system today while also ensuring and optimizing transportation for future generations.
7
Bridge and Highway Conditions(does not include NY Works Program)
72
74
llent
ges
STATE HIGHWAY BRIDGE CONDITION
(does not include NY Works Program)
62
64
66
68
70
ercent Goo
d + Exce
By Num
ber o
f Bridg
New way of business
60
62
'94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16
PeB
History Flat Funding with Old Strategy Flat Funding with New Strategy
75
STATE PAVEMENT CONDITION
50
55
60
65
70
nt Goo
d + Excellent
Lane
‐miles New way of business
40
45
50
'94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16
Percen
History Flat Funding with Old Strategy Flat Funding with New Strategy
8
NYSDOT Capital Program/NY Works Accelerated Bridge/Pavement ProgramBridge/Pavement Program
The Budget includes an unprecedented level of investment in the State’s highway and bridges of approximately $2.9 billion in SFY 2012‐13.
o $1.7 billion for State and local road/bridge construction;
o $1.2 billion to accelerate the repair, replacement and improvement of roads and bridges authorized under the Governor’s NY Works program.
This extraordinary support creates new and exciting opportunity to improve our infrastructure while creating well‐paying construction‐related jobsrelated jobs.
9
Accelerated Bridge/Pavement Program
To ensure that NYSDOT put people to work immediately at the beginning of this construction season, the accelerated preservation projects were put out for bid in April, May and June.projects were put out for bid in April, May and June.
The process utilized both traditional and innovative delivery methods, i l diincluding:
Design‐build
Pre‐qualification of contractors
Best value
Bundled regional contracts
The selection of accelerated program projects was based on engineering needs and the implementation of a preservation first strategy that will b t i t i th hi h t ithi il bl f dibest maintain the highway system within available funding.
10
NY Works/NYSDOT Two‐Year Capital Plan Proposal
11
NYSDOT Two‐Year Capital Program
Integrates asset management based preservation strategies to guide the capital programming and project planning process for all
dmodes.
Ensures appropriate investments are made at the right time pp p g
Maximizes the amount of infrastructure in “good” condition
Employs innovative program delivery and project procurement processes, such as Design‐Buildp , g
Enhances flexibility to address emergencies and unforeseen i tcircumstances.
12
Beyond the short termThrough strategic investment in our transportation system – with an emphasis on preserving our existing infrastructure -our existing infrastructure -NYSDOT will help build the foundation for future
i th f Neconomic growth of New York State.
NYSDOT is taking action to ensure its decisions today will support future quality of life and the economy of the State for decades to come.
What does that mean for structures?
Preservation FirstPreservation FirstFederal Aid
TIP/STIP Update & MAP21TIP/STIP Update & MAP21Statewide Prioritization Program
14
Preservation First
Get full useful lifeLook for window of opportunity investments
Focused repair workpLimit work, fix what is brokenCombined element specific contracts
Monitor conditions & needsDefer capital action until no longer possiblep g pPlan at least one major rehab in bridge life
Structures Preservation Options
Region 4 (Rochester) examplesRegion 4 (Rochester) examplesUnit costs (2011$) and life cycles not applicable statewideapplicable statewide.
16
Preservation Treatment TableState Forces Treatment Expected Element Life (yrs)
Bridge Washing 2
Superstructure Sealing 5
Beam End Repairs 40 +Beam End Repairs 40 +
Substructure Repairs Varies
Joint Repairs 15
Bearing Replacement 25
Deck Repairs Varies
Capital Treatment Expected Element Life (yrs) Unit Cost(y )
Zone Painting 12 $75,000 / bridge
Bridge Painting 12 $ 1.0 Million
J i t R i 15 $45 000 / j i tJoint Repairs 15 $45,000 / joint
Bearing Replacement 25 $6,000 / bearingReplacementSubstructure Rehabilitation 20+ Varies
Beam End Repairs 40 + $12,000 - $30,000 per beam
$150 000+/pierPier Replacement 50+ $150,000+/pier($30,000/pedestal)
Deck TreatmentExpected
Element Life Unit CostDeck Treatment Element Life (yrs)
Unit Cost
Superstructure 5 $5 000 / bridgeSealing 5 $5,000 / bridge
Thin Polymer Overlay $6 / SFOverlay
Deck Inlay 20+ $30 / SFDeck Inlay 20 $30 / SF
Deck OverlayDeck Overlay (Membrane andPave)
10-12 $4 / SF
Deck Replacement 50+ $125+ / SF
Pier Rehab/Replacement
After
Before
Investigation required to determine appropriate scope consisting of partial repair, encasement, or replacement.
Structural Flag Beam End Repair
After
Before
Substructure Repair and Bearing Replacement
AfterAfter
Before
Bridge Deck Inlay
After
Before
Investigation required to determine appropriate scope consisting of inlay, overlay, or membrane and pave.
Joint Repair
After
Before
Membrane and Overlay
After
Before
R t d k f ti lit b idi lit idiRestore deck functionality by providing a quality riding surface while maximizing remaining deck life.
Investigation NeedsReview Biennial Bridge Inspection Reports and Inventory g p p yData
Visual Inspection
Complete element sounding (hand tools, chain drag)
Ground Penetrating RadarGround Penetrating Radar
Chloride testing (cores or drill powder testing)
Substructure cores.
Deck cores
Investigation is an integral aspect to asset management. Good field information coupled with laboratory tests and engineering experience
Deck cores.
p y g g pallow choosing the right treatment at the right time.
TIP/STIP Overview
Required update to match MAP21 and spendRequired update to match MAP21 and spend federal aid.Includes new Statewide Capital PrioritizationIncludes new Statewide Capital Prioritization Program
Projects after 10/1/14Projects after 10/1/1425% of available funds11/9/12 deadline for candidate submission from11/9/12 deadline for candidate submission from NYSDOT Region to Albany. Earlier from local sponsor to NYSDOT Region.
NYSDOT Planning Target ConceptStep 1 : Distribute Non-core funds
HSIPCMAQMPTA
29
Planning Target ConceptStep 2: Apportion Remaining Funds
5% Commissioners Discretionary Reserve60% Regional Preservation Allocation10% Regional Capital Allocation25% Statewide Capital Prioritization25% Statewide Capital Prioritization
Preservation defined morebroadlybroadly
Demand response, guiderail, …
Cannot predetermine MPO useCannot predetermine MPO use. . . Marchiselli discussion
30
Planning Target Concept
Step 3. Regional Targets : RelativeStep 3. Regional Targets : Relative Infrastructure Needs
Model driven bridge & pavement needs.Preservation (60%) and capital (10%)State and local systems
Step 4. Regional Targets : Apportion regional allocations proportional to needallocations proportional to need
31
Planning Target ConceptStep 5. Statewide Capital Prioritization (25%)
Apportion funds proportional to capital needsApportion funds proportional to capital needs
Centralized reviewCentralized reviewSubmit ‘Beyond Preservation’ candidatesStatewide asset teams review and recommend priorities to CPTCPT endorsementE ti lExecutive approval
32
Statewide Prioritization SummaryStatewide Capital Prioritization
Replacement, Major rehabs (>50% RP cost) & some very large preservation projectslarge preservation projects
Project solicitationBridge/Pavement Index
Quantitative, data driven. SSMT/SPMT/CPT Review & Selection
3 Priority TiersyProject review & prioritization within available fundsIncorporates qualitative factorsIncorporates qualitative factors
Executive Approval MPO Programming
Statewide Capital Prioritization
Bridge Pavement Index Index
(0 to 100) (0 to 10)
Must Satisfy or Justify
34
Reference Bridge Examples
New, Local, Low-VolumeGrist Mill Rd / Ston Creek 2009 (BINGrist Mill Rd / Stony Creek -2009 (BIN 3305560)R i 1 R l Mi C ll tRegion 1, Rural Minor CollectorAdjacent PS boxesCR=7, AADT =1396
Category Points
Capital Need 0
Facility Importance 4.02
Restrictions 0Restrictions 0
Potential Risk 7.5
Bridge Index 11.52
New, State 2-lane, Low-VolumeSR429/ Bergholtz Creek 1997 (BINSR429/ Bergholtz Creek – 1997 (BIN 1048440)Region 5 Urban Minor ArterialRegion 5, Urban Minor ArterialReinforced concrete frameCR 6 931 AADT 8 349 5% T kCR=6.931, AADT =8,349, 5% Trucks
Category Points
Capital Need 0
Facility Importance 10.89
Restrictions 0Restrictions 0
Potential Risk 2
Bridge Index 12.89
New, Interstate, Low/Mid-VolumeI86/ Meads Creek 2011 (BIN 1011222)I86/ Meads Creek – 2011 (BIN 1011222)Region 6, Interstate, NHSSteel multigirderCR=7, AADT =13,303, 21% trucks
Category Points
Capital Need 0
Facility Importance 22.89
Restrictions 0Restrictions 0
Potential Risk 0
Bridge Index 22.89
Older, Local, Low-VolumeCR116/H nts Creek 1930 (BIN 3312050)CR116/Hunts Creek - 1930 (BIN 3312050)Region 3, Rural minor collectorReinforced concrete archCR= 3.714, AADT = 1,178, 9% trucks
Category Points
Capital Need 37.68
Facility Importance 4.20
Restrictions 0Restrictions 0
Potential Risk 6.25
Bridge Index 48.13
Older, State 2-lane, Low-VolumeSR96/ Catatonk Creek 1949 (BIN 1034960)SR96/ Catatonk Creek – 1949 (BIN 1034960)Region 9, Rural minor arterialSt l lti i d ilSteel multigirder, no pilesCR= 3.444, AADT = 2,898, 10% trucksReplacement programmed, 2012
Category Points
Capital Need 41.40
Facility Importance 10.06
Restrictions 5 00Restrictions 5.00
Potential Risk 5.50
Bridge Index 61.95
Older, Interstate, Mid-VolumeI490/CSX RR 1963 (BIN 1048591)I490/CSX RR - 1963 (BIN 1048591)Region 4, Interstate, NHSSt l lti i dSteel multigirderCR= 3.563, AADT = 12,597, 8% truckssuperstructure replacement programmed 2015 (small qualitative bump for rehab possible)
Category Points
Capital Need 37.96
Facility Importance 20.88
Restrictions 0Restrictions 0
Potential Risk 0.50
Bridge Index 61.13
More Risk, Older, Mid-volume StateSR13/Fall Creek 1964 (1010400)SR13/Fall Creek -1964 (1010400)Region 3, Urban Principal Arterial, NHSSt l lti i d il (lSteel multigirder, no piles (larger qualitative bump likely for potential risk)CR 3 406 AADT 14 805 6% kCR=3.406, AADT =14,805, 6% trucksReplacement Programmed 2012
Category Points
Capital Need 41.92
Facility Importance 18.85
Restrictions 0Restrictions 0
Potential Risk 5.50
Bridge Index 66.27
Priority Tier : Qualitative ReviewQualitative Review & Selection
1 CAPITAL NEED1. CAPITAL NEED 2. FACILITY IMPORTANCE3. RESTRICTIONS4 POTENTIAL RISK4. POTENTIAL RISK
Same categories as index, but for issues not captured by existing data‘Ti ’ ti & fi l i iti‘Tier’ sorting & final priorities
No meaningful difference in priority between close index scoresEngineering judgment and non-recorded, special circumstance d t d d f fi l i iti tidata needed for final prioritization.
No specific score‘Trump’ case. Special circumstance makes p preplacement very important.
Conclusions
NYSDOTNYSDOTContinued Emphasis on PreservationSuccessful in slowing system deteriorationSuccessful in slowing system deterioration
MAP21Elimination of old bridge program Rolled intoElimination of old bridge program. Rolled into NHPP (85%) and STP (15%)Shift in emphasis to NHS routes.p
Statewide Capital Prioritization ProgramPicking most important projects in the statePicking most important projects in the state
44
QUESTIONS1. What is an example of a bridge preservation treatment?2. Is preservation a cost effective tool to slow bridge deterioration?3. What is the name of the new federal transportation program?4. The old federal bridge funding program (HBRR/HBP) has been rolled up an refocused
h t ti f th t ?on what portion of the system?5. Is the Statewide Capital Prioritization Program f d b id t ?focused on bridges or pavements?
45