Upload
hanna-daniel
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Comprehensive Cancer Alliance for Idaho (CCAI)
WELCOME
Stacey CarsonCancer Data Registry of Idaho
Current President, CCAI
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
VISION
Every Idahoan deserves the opportunity for proper cancer prevention and detection, state of the art cancer treatment, and the highest
possible quality of life which we are committed to provide through a data driven, coordinated
comprehensive cancer plan.
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
MISSION
• Strengthen and coordinate efforts to address cancer issues along the continuum of cancer prevention and care.
• Assess, define and monitor the burden of cancer in Idaho.
• Resources will be identified or developed and will be networked through collaborative efforts.
• Raise awareness among the general populations, health care professions, organizations, agencies and policymakers.
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
IdahoComprehensive Cancer Alliance
for Idaho (CCAI)
Stakeholders and Partners
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Purpose of Medical Advisory Committee
• To guide the CCAI board’s strategic direction, professional education, and data distribution
• To act in advisory capacity to programs:– Cancer Data Registry of Idaho (CDRI)– Women’s Health Check – Breast & Cervical
Cancer Early Detection– Comprehensive Cancer Program
• Engage your participation and find ways that we can be of value to you as you care for our communities
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Composition & Time Commitment
• WHO: Physicians with expertise and interest in cancer prevention, early detection, treatment, and quality of life
• Locations: Meetings will be virtual
• Time Commitment: 2 Web-based meetings (1 hour), and 2 Email responses per year
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Potential Topics
• New technology and how it relates to limited public funds for screening special populations
• Review practice guidelines and quality assurance for screening and diagnostic services
• Provide clinical consultation for guidelines relating to early detection and education
• Provide input for professional development
• Provide recommendations for data distribution
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Cancer Data Registry of Idaho
Chris Johnson, MPHEpidemiologist
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Cancer Data Registry of Idaho
• CDRI is a statewide cancer registry that collects incidence and survival data on all cancer patients who reside in the state of Idaho or who are diagnosed and/or treated for cancer in the state of Idaho.
• CDRI was established in 1969 and became population-based in 1971.
• Cancer is a reportable disease under state law, and operations of the registry are mandated by Idaho Code.
• Funding comes from three sources:– <1% of the Idaho tobacco tax.– CDC– Grants & contracts
13
CoC Hospital
Registries
Other Reporting Sources
CDRI
Other Hospital
Registries
WHO
IARC CI5
NCDB
United States Cancer Statistics
NAACCR
CDC - NPCR SEER
Cancer Registry Data Flow
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Central Cancer Registries
• Consolidate and Disseminate
2 Flavors
• NCI – SEER – 10 states, 2 metro areas, 3 population groups
• CDC – NPCR – 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Pacific Island Jurisdictions
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
15
Quality of Idaho Cancer Data• NAACCR Gold Standard for Quality,
Completeness, and Timeliness. • Because we produce high quality
cancer incidence data, we have been included in the combined cancer incidence sections of all United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) and Cancer in North America (CINA) publications to date (1993-current for CINA; 1999-current for USCS).
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
16
(Some) Uses of Idaho Cancer Data
• CDRI data are used for many purposes:– Surveillance of cancer incidence rates– Quality assurance of hospital registry data – Responding to requests for information from
hospitals, media, and the public– Public health practice– Comprehensive Cancer Alliance for Idaho
planning and evaluation – Comparative Effectiveness Research
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
17
CDRI Data Used in Population-Based Epidemiologic Studies
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
18
CDRI Data Used in Population-Based Epidemiologic Studies
• ABHACUS Supplement– Journal CANCER,
produced by American Cancer Society
• 23 articles:– Baseline burden– Overview of HPV– Federal initiatives– Data from 39 states used in
analysis
Human Papillomavirus Virus Vaccines•Gardasil – 2006 FDA approved Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine (HPV 6, 11, 16,18)
Prevents cervical, vaginal, vulvar precancers•Cervarix - Bivalent HPV Vaccine (HPV 16, 18) undergoing FDA approval
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Comparative Effectiveness Research
• “CER …compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat and monitor a clinical condition, or to improve the delivery of care.” – IOM
• 10 states funded as specialized registries– Expansion of electronic data collection– Develop datasets for researchers to address
CER-related questions
• 2011 cases, project ends Sept 2013
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Examples of CER Questions
• Are colorectal cancer patients tested for K-RAS and are the results used appropriately to determine treatment? What impact does K-RAS testing have on 2-3 year survival among colorectal cancer patients?
• Are rectal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy and what is the timing of radiotherapy? Are disparities apparent in the appropriate neo-adjuvant use of radiotherapy among these patients?
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Comprehensive Cancer Alliance for IdahoStrategic Plan Objectives 2011‐2015
Outcome Measures Used in Cancer Control
* Outcome measures in decreasing order of utility for monitoring and evaluating components of cancer control. Adapted from: Armstrong BK. The role of the cancer registry in cancer control. Cancer Causes and Control 1992;3:569-579.
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Where did we get these objectives?• Healthy People 2020 Cancer Objectives
– “Healthy People provides science-based, 10-year national objectives for improving the health of all Americans.”
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)– “the lead Federal agency charged with improving
the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for all Americans.”
• Idaho Comprehensive Cancer Strategic Plan 2006-2010
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
• Cancer is #1 cause of death in Idaho.
• 2,559 cancer deaths in 2011.
Cancer Mortality
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
CDRI and MAC
• What we can do for you:– Provide information for decision making
• What you can do for us:– Provide guidance for measuring treatment
• Comparative Effectiveness Research
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Questions/Discussion
• In terms of information on cancer burden in Idaho/statistics, was any of this news to you?
• If yes, what ideas do you have for disseminating this information to Idaho’s medical community?
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Women's Health Check
Susan Bordeaux, RNClinical Coordinator
Women’s Health Check
• Program serves nearly 5,000 women yearly.• Low-income, uninsured and underinsured, aged 50-64
for breast screening, aged 40-64 for cervical screening • 138 women diagnosed with cancer in FY12
– 77 Breast, 3 Cervical, 58 Pre-cervical• Most of these diagnosed women are referred to BCC
Medicaid for the duration of their active treatment. • 10 contractors coordinate over 400 providers • Program oversees quality assurance and improvement
for best care by national standards
Medical Advisory Committee (MAC)
• Professional Education – – Idaho Ranks 51st in mammography screening– Promote early detection through increasing
physician mammography referrals– Best format, methods, CME strategies
• Clinical Breast Exam (CBE) – – Importance in breast cancer screening
• Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (future)– Consider issues for Idaho, pros and cons
Professional Education
– Prevention – physical activity, diet, tobacco cessation, public education- backed by professional recommendations
– Early detection – support clinical breast exams and screening mammography
– Increase referrals = increase mammograms, increase regular Pap testing
Screening and Diagnostic Referral Guidance
May 2012
Caroline Sobota, MD
Gem State Radiologyhttp://www.ccaidaho.org/docs/B%20Ca
%20in%20ID%20lectureW07.pdf
Cervical Cancer Screening Cervical Cancer Screening UpdateUpdate
May 2012
Lee Parsons, MDOB/GYN AssociatesBoise and Treasure Valley, Idaho
http://www.ccaidaho.org/professional.html
Cancer Screening Intervals, Algorithms, and Information
Breast Cancer •http://www.operationpinkbag.org/Professional.cfm
•California State Breast Cancer Algorithms•Mammography screening intervals comparison fact sheet•Breast Cancer in Idaho fact sheet
Cervical Cancer•http://www.ccaidaho.org/ resources.htm
•New USPSTF cervical cancer screening intervals•ASCCP, ACOG, ACS•Cervical diagnostic algorithms follow ASCCP
Professional Education for Referral Promotion
• Professional development targets – Who refers?, How do we reach them?– Algorithms, resources – posted to CCAI and
Operation Pink B.A.G. websites, other ideas?
• Format– Webinars w/ CME’s– Brown bags, conference calls– Best format w/ limited $
Clinical Breast Exam (CBE)• The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess
the additional benefits and harms of clinical breast examination (CBE) beyond screening mammography in women 40 years or older. Grade: Insufficient Evidence
• CDC requires CBE as part of a “complete breast screening exam”– Not offered at all mammography centers– USPSTF recommendation may influence future direction/cost-cutting
measures
• What does this mean? – – MAC opinions– Possible statement of support for CBEs
Questions to MAC on first survey in early 2013
Colorectal Cancer Screening Program(not funded at this time)
ranks 2nd among cancer mortality (2011 = #222)
Pros– Increase early detection
Idaho screening ranked 47th
– Decrease late-stage dx’s– Decrease mortality– Use WHC as a model for
data recovery, reporting, and QA
– Increase quality cancer preventive/patient navigation services
Cons– No $ for treatment costs– Screen using FOBT or FIT– Colonoscopy only after
suspicious results
Questions to MAC on first survey in early 2013
MAC Discussion
• What can we do to educate and encourage primary care providers to refer for mammograms?
• Survey early in 2013 (CBE and Colorectal Program)
Contacts:Susan Bordeaux, RN, Idaho Women’s Health Check
• [email protected]• Phone (208) 334-5971
Minnie Inzer Muniz, MEd, Idaho Women’s Health Check• [email protected]• Phone (208) 332-7311
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Idaho Comprehensive Cancer Program (ICCCP)
Patti Moran, MHS
Manager208-332-7344
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Population Based Program
• No funds allowed for research, screening or other clinical services
• CCC Cancer Spectrum: Prevention, Early Detection, Diagnosis, Tx, Quality of Life (Palliative Care, Survivorship), End of Life
• Priorities: Colorectal and skin cancer; some breast & cervical cancer and oral cancer partnership promotion work
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
ICCCP, cont.
• Surveillance, Public Education, Awareness/Communication/Outreach, Professional Education, Some Policy
• Contract with the seven local health districts to maintain a local cancer coalition and do promotion and education
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
CDC DirectionDomain 2: Policy and Environmental Supports
• PolicyNote: Policy here refers to organizational level, local level, or legislative policy. Examples:–Increase tobacco tax–Coverage for care if enrolled in a clinical trial –Tanning bed restrictions–Physical education in schools –Smoke free environments- parks, housing, worksite, etc. –Sun safety policies- schools
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
Policy/Environment, cont.
Environmental Support Strategies•Creating conditions that promote health and support and reinforce healthful behaviors (statewide in schools, worksites, and communities). Examples:
– Nutrition standards – Accessible foods – Pricing strategies – Built environments- walkability, sun safety
Com
pre
hensi
ve C
an
cer
Alli
ance
for
Idaho
MAC Input
• Needed: Input on development of a cancer policy agenda for Idaho
• Survey