Concept of Operations and Standard Operating Proceduresnorthfloridatpo.com/images/uploads/docs/Dynamic_Detour_Final... · Concept of Operations and Standard Operating Procedures

Concept of Operations and SOP

January 2012

North Florida TPO1022 Prudential DriveJacksonville, FL 32207

Concept of Operations and Standard Operating Procedures

For Dynamic Detour System

Ta

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

able of Cont

Introdu

1.1. Defi

Purpos

2.1. Syst

2.2. Docu

System

3.1. Proj

3.2. Syst

State o

4.1. Regi4.2. Flor

4.3. FHW4.4. USD

4.5. Minn

4.6. Mich4.7. Simu

Dynam

5.1. Dete

5.2. Veri5.3. Noti

5.4. Resp5.5. Clea

5.6. Reco

5.7. Traf5.8. Trav

5.9. Afte

Event a

6.1. Even6.1.1.

6.1.2.

6.2. Incid6.2.1.

6.2.2. 6.2.3.

6.2.4.

Stakeh

7.1. Plan7.2. Tran

7.3. Law

tents

uction .......

nition of Sta

se ..............

tems Engine

ument Outli

m Overview

ect Definitio

tem Backgro

of Practice

ional Existinida DOT’s A

WA’s AlternaDOT’s Integr

nesota DOT

higan DOT’sulation Stud

ic Detour

ection ..........

fication ......fication ......

ponse ..........arance .........

overy ..........

fic Managemveler Inform

er Action Re

and Incide

nt Types .....Planned Ev

Unplanned

dent Types .28BCatastroph

29BMajor Incid30BIntermedia

31BMinor Incid

olders’ Ro

nning Organnsportation/

Enforceme

.................

andard Term

.................

eering “V” ..

ine ...............

w ...............

on and Scop

ound ............

e Review .

ng State of Arterial DMS

ate Route Hrated Corrid

’s I-494 Inte

I-75 Integrdies ..............

System In

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

ment ...........mation ..........

eview ...........

ent Types .

.....................vents ...........

Events .......

.....................hic Incident

dent ..............ate Incident

dent .............

oles and R

ization - No/Public Wor

ent and Publ

.................

ms ................

.................

.....................

.....................

.................

pe .................

.....................

.................

Practice .....S ....................

andbook .....dor Managem

egrated Cor

rated Corrid.....................

ncident Ma

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

Responsibi

orth Florida rks Agency .

lic Safety A

.................

......................

.................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................ment Progra

rridor Mana

dor Managem......................

anagemen

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

ilities .......

TPO ...................................

gencies .......

.................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................am ...............

agement ......

ment .................................

nt Process

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

s ...............

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

Concept oDynamic D

.................

......................

.................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

of OperationsDetour System

i

............... 1

................... 1

.............. 3

.................. 3

.................. 4

.............. 6

.................. 6

.................. 6

.............. 8

.................. 8

.................. 8

.................. 9

................ 10

................. 12

................. 13

................. 13

............. 14

................ 14

................ 14

................. 15

................. 15

................. 15

................. 15

................. 15

................. 16

................. 16

............. 17

................. 17

................. 17

................. 17

................. 17

................. 17

................. 17

................ 18

................ 18

............. 19

................. 19

................. 19

................. 21

8.

9.

10

11.

12

7.4. Stat7.5. Tran

7.6. Priv7.7. Elec

7.8. Loca

Operat

8.1. Insti

8.1.1. 8.1.2.

8.2. Tech8.2.1.

System

9.1. Devi

9.1.1. 9.1.2.

9.2. Corr

9.3. Cost9.4. Pow

9.5. Devi9.6. Arte

9.6.1.

9.6.2. 9.7. Syst

0. Operat

10.1. Sing

10.2. Mult10.3. Corr

Standa

11.1. Impl

11.2. Resp11.3. Syst

11.4. Deci

11.5. Esca11.6. De-e

11.7. Afte11.8. Publ

. I-95 Ca

12.1. Opti

12.2. Stud

12.3. Esca12.4. De-e

12.5. Afte

te and Localnsit Agency

ate Towing ted Officials

al Media ......

ional and

itutional En

Traffic ManRoad Rang

hnical EnvirExisting IT

m Deploym

ice Conside

Arterial DyArterial Dy

ridor Consid

t Consideratwer Supply C

ice Communerial Signal T

Traffic Sign

Adaptive Ttem Interfac

ional Scen

gle Segment

tiple-Segmeridor Impact

rd Operat

ementation

ponder Orietem and Res

ision Suppo

alation Procescalation P

er Action Relic Informat

ase Study

ons Conside

dy Area .......

alation Procescalation P

er Action Re

l Emergency.....................

Companiess and Comm

.....................

Support E

vironment..

nagement Cger Program

onment ......S Network .

ment ..........

rations .......

ynamic Trailynamic Mess

deration ......

tions ...........Consideratio

nication ConTiming Mod

nal System

Traffic Signace Consider

narios ......

t Impact ......

ent Impact ..t ...................

ting Proce

n Plan Overv

entation andsource Depl

rt System ..

cedure .........Procedure ...

eview ...........ion Campaig

.................

eration ........

.....................

cedure .........Procedure ...

eview ...........

y Operation.....................

....................munity Grou

.....................

Environme

.....................

Center ..........m ....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

lblazer Signsage Signs .

.....................

.....................ons................

nsiderationsification Co

and Capabi

al Control Syrations .........

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

edures ......

view .............

d Coordinatiloyment ......

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................gn ................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

n Center .............................

......................ps ................

......................

ent ............

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

...........................................

......................

......................

......................

s ....................onsideration

lities ............

ystem ................................

.................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

ion ......................................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................ns ..................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

Concept oDynamic D

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................


ii

............... 22

................23

................23

................23

................23

........... 24

............... 24

............... 24

............... 24

............... 25

............... 25

............ 27

................ 27

................ 27

............... 29

................. 31

................. 31

................32

................32

................ 33

................ 33

............... 34

............... 34

............ 35

............... 35

................ 37

............... 39

............. 41

................ 41

................ 41

................ 41

............... 42

............... 43

............... 44

............... 44

............... 44

........... 45

............... 45

............... 45

............... 52

............... 52

............... 52

13

Ap

Ap

Ap

Ap

Ta

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

Fig

12.6. Prel12.7. I-29

. Referen

ppendix A:

ppendix B:

ppendix C:

ppendix D:

able of Figu

gure 1. System

gure 2. North

gure 1. FDOT

gure 1. Corrid

gure 2. Summ

gure 3. Overa

gure 4. Stand

gure 5. Existi

gure 6. Arter

gure 7. Arter

gure 8. Arter

gure 9. Arter

gure 10. Singl

gure 11. Multip

gure 12. Corri

gure 13. Syste

gure 14. Decis

gure 15. Dyna

gure 16. Arte

gure 17. Dyna

gure 18. Arte

gure 19. Dyna

gure 20. Arte

gure 21. I-295

iminary Cos5/SR 9A Lo

nces ........

District-2

Sample Me

Public Info

Detailed P

ures

ms Engineeri

h Florida TPO

District 4 Ar

dor Assets Int

mary of Bene

all ICM Benef

dard Operatin

ing ITS Cover

ial Dynamic T

ial Dynamic T

rial DMS ........

ial DMS Conc

le Segment I

ple-Segment

idor Impact -

em and Reso

sion Support

amic Trailblaz

rial DMS Opt

amic Trailblaz

rial DMS Opt

amic Trailblaz

erial DMS Opt

5/SR 9A Alte

st Estimatesoop Alternat

.................

Detour Ma

emorandum

ormation C

Preliminary

ing “V” ..........

O Service Are

rterial DMS ...

tegrated in IC

fit Cost for H

fit under Diffe

ng Processes

rage ...............

Trailblazer S

Trailblazer S

.......................

cept Layout .

mpact - Conc

Impact - Con

- Concept Lay

ource Coordin

System Flow

zer Option: S

ion: Segmen

zer Option: S

ion: Segmen

zer Option: S

tion: Segmen

ernate Route

s and Numbte Route Co

.................

aps

m of Under

ampaign

Cost Estim

.......................

ea Map ...........

.......................

CM .................

High Demand

erent Operat

s ......................

.......................

ign .................

ign Concept

.......................

.......................

cept Layout .

ncept Layout

yout ...............

nation Diagra

w Chart .........

Segment-1, Ph

t-1, Philips H

Segment-2, N

t-2, North o

Segment-3, S

nt-3, South o

e Concept ......

ber of Deviceoncept .........

.................

rstanding

mates

........................

........................

........................

........................

with Major I

tional Condit

........................

........................

........................

Layout ..........

........................

........................

........................

t ......................

........................

am ..................

........................

hilips Highwa

ighway South

North of Race

f Race Track

outh of IGP t

f IGP to Nort

........................

es Used ...........................

.................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

ncident ........

ions ...............

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

ay South to P

h to Philips H

e Track Road

k Road to Phi

to North of R

th of Race Tr

.......................

.....................

.....................

.................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

Philips Highw

Highway Nort

d to Philips H

ilips Highway

Race Track R

rack Road .....

........................

Concept oDynamic D

......................

......................

.................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

way North ......

th ...................

Highway Sout

y South .........

oad ...............

.......................

.......................


iii

............... 53

............... 53

............ 55

.................... 4

.................... 6

.................... 9

................... 11

.................. 12

.................. 12

.................. 14

................. 26

................. 27

................. 28

................. 29

................. 30

................. 36

................. 38

................. 40

................. 42

................. 43

................. 46

................. 47

th .............. 48

................. 49

................. 50

.................. 51

................. 54

Lis

Ta

Ta

Ta

Ta

Ta

Ta

Ta

st of Tables

ble 1: ITS Com

ble 2: Conge

ble 3: Stakeh

ble 4: List of

ble 5: Corrid

ble 6: System

ble 7: Cost E

s

mmunication

stion Impact

holder Involv

f Advantages

or Informatio

m Cost Table

stimate and

Item OriginReviewReviseReviewReviseVerifieFinal R

n Coverage ...

s of Planned

ement in Eac

s and Disadva

on ...................

e ......................

Number of D

Qu

nator wed By ed By wed By ed By ed By Report Submi

.......................

and Unplann

ch Phase of D

antages of Ar

.......................

.......................

Devices Used

uality Contro

itted on

........................

ned Events....

Dynamic Deto

rterial Trailb

........................

........................

.......................

ol Tracking INameSharmShawSharmBarbarSharmBarbarSharm

.......................

.......................

our System R

lazer and DM

.......................

.......................

.......................

Informatione D

ma 0101

ma 02resso 02

ma 02resso 02

ma 01

........................

........................

Route Planni

MS Concepts .

........................

........................

........................

Date 1/19/2011 1/26/2011 2/03/2011 2/15/2011 2/23/2011 2/25/2011 1/23/2012

Concept oDynamic D

.......................

.......................

ng..................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................


iv

.................... 7

.................... 9

.................. 19

.................. 31

.................. 31

................. 32

................. 53

1.

Thimdo

Thdifresop

0B0B0B0BIntroduc

e Dynamic plementing dcument will s

- Why: pr

- What: id

- Where:

- Who: id

- When: i

- How: id

e concept oferent resposponsibilitieserations doc

1.1. 13B13B13B13BDef

This sectio

Dynamic Dtraffic in reITS compoinformationoriginal rou

Decision Ssupport res

Integrated Corridor Mcreates an of proactivreceive infalternative example, won that rolocation, tim

Intelligent and wire litransportatimprove sa

ITS Projectacquisition provision o

ITS Architeplanning, dcross-sectitechnology

The

The

Thean i

tion

Detour Systdetours usingserve as a gu

roviding syst

dentifying ex

identifying m

entifying sta

dentifying in

dentifying res

f operationsonding agencs, and proviument will al

finition of S

n provides de

etour Systemeal time baseonent that n to travelersute.

upport Systesponders in m

Corridor Mananagement interconnect

ve multimodormation tha

transportatwhile driving i

ute and be ming and par

Transportatiine communtion system'fety, and enh

t: Accordingof technolo

f one or mor

ecture: Accodefining, and on of the IT

y specialists,

e functions (e

e physical en

e informationintegrated sy

tem (DDS) cg alternate rouideline for e

em justificat

xisting system

major corrido

akeholders an

nstances whe

sources need

s is developecies, understde guidelinelso provide e

tandard Ter

efinition of st

m: This termed on real timcollects reas to help the

em: The decmaking inform

nagement (ICis the coordted system cal managemat encompastion optionsin a future ICinformed of

rking availabi

on System (ications-bases infrastructhance individ

g to the FHWogies or syse ITS user se

rding to the integrating

TS communitconsultants,

e.g., gather tr

tities or subs

n and data flystem.

concept of outes on normergency re

tion, corridor

m componen

ors for the sy

nd their resp

en traffic dive

ded to design

ed to improvand the systes for actioxample oper

rms

tandard term

m was coinedme traffic infal-time traffim make info

cision suppormed, timely, a

CM): Accordindination of incapable of cr

ment of infrasses the ent—even durin

CM corridor, f alternativeility.

ITS): Accorded informatiture, and in dual productiv

WA, an ITS stems of teervices as de

FHWA, the NITS. It is a

ty (transportetc.). The ar

raffic inform

systems whe

ows that con

operations rtheast Floridesponders an

r analysis and

ts and their c

ystem implem

ective respo

ersion activit

n, build, opera

ve safety of tem operatio

ons taken drational scena

ms that are us

d by the Regformation. Aic informatirmed decisio

rt system is and accurate

ng to the Fedndividual netross networkastructure asire transpor

ng a trip—ina traveler co transportat

ing to the FHon and electvehicles thevity.

project is achnologies tfined in the N

National ITS mature protation practirchitecture d

ation or requ

ere these fun

nnect these f

will serve ada’s major rod transporta

d system cap

capabilities

mentation

nsibilities

ties need to b

ate, and main

the respondon and its imuring detouarios.

sed in this do

gional ITS CoA major part

on from thons on select

a knowledge decisions.

deral Highwatwork operatk travel manassets by instation netwo response tould be infortion options

HWA, ITS enctronics tech

emselves, the

ny project tthat provideNational ITS

Architectureoduct that reitioners, systefines:

uest a route)

ctions reside

functions an

as a regionaoadway systeation profess

pability

be performed

ntain the sys

ders, enhancmpact on var

r implement

ocument alon

oalition for tof the dyname road net

ting an altern

ge-based sys

ay Administrations betweeagement. In astitutional pork. They coto changing rmed in adva

such as a

compasses ahnologies. Wese technolo

that in whole or significArchitecture

e provides aeflects the ctems engine

that are req

e (e.g., the fie

d physical su

Concept oDynamic D

al frameworem during incionals on:

d

tem

ce coordinatrious agencietation. This

ng with its so

he concept omic detour sywork and d

nate or conti

stem that is

ation (FHWAen parallel faan ICM corridartners, trav

ould dynamic traffic connce of congenearby tran

a broad rangeWhen integratogies relieve

e, or in parantly contrie.

common fracontributionseers, system

quired for ITS

eld or the veh

ubsystems t


1

k model oncidents. This

ion betweenes’ roles and

concept of

ource.

of detouringystem is thedisseminatesnuing on the

intended to

), Integratedacilities thatdor, becausevelers couldcally shift tonditions. Forestion aheadnsit facility's

e of wirelessted into thecongestion,

t, funds thebute to the

amework fors of a broad

developers,

S.

hicle).

ogether into

System: Acor more sta

Systems Emeans to efunctionalitsynthesis a

Systems estructured engineeringquality prod

Signal Systmaximum t

Traffic Pacbut not stodiversion. Tminutes tosetting brid

List of Acro

CCTV

DDS

DMS

EOC

EMS

FDOT

FHP

FHWA

ITS

ICM

JSO

JFRD

LED

MUTCD

MOT

TMC

USDOT

ccording to thated purpose

ngineering: enable the rety early in thand system v

engineering idevelopmen

g considers bduct that me

tem: Signal sthroughput.

cing: Accordiop traffic to fTraffic contr

o perform thdge beams, o

onyms

Clos

Dyn

Dyn

Eme

Eme

Flor

Flor

Fede

Inte

Inte

Jack

Jack

Ligh

Man

Main

Traf

Unit

he FHWA, a ses.

According toealization of he developmalidation whi

integrates ant process both the busieets the user

ystem can b

ng to FDOT facilitate shorol officers phe overhead overhead sign

sed Circuit Te

amic Detour

amic Messag

ergency Oper

ergency Medi

ida Departm

ida Highway

eral Highway

lligent Trans

grated Corrid

ksonville She

ksonville Fire

ht Emitting D

nual of Unifor

ntenance of T

ffic Managem

ted States De

system is a c

o the FHWAsuccessful s

ment cycle, dile considerin

ll the discipthat procee

iness and theneeds.

e defined as

Standard Indort duration pace or slow

construction structures,

elevision or t

System

ge Signs

rations Cente

ical Services

ent of Transp

Patrol

y Administrat

sportation Sy

dor Managem

eriff’s Office

e and Rescue

iode

rm Traffic Co

Traffic

ment Center

epartment of

combination

A, systems esystems. It fodocumenting ng the compl

plines and seds from ce technical ne

a group of t

dex 655, trawork operat

w the traffic n. The depaand replacin

traffic camer

er

portation

tion

ystem

ment

e Department

ontrol Device

f Transportat

of interactin

engineering iocuses on derequirementete problem.

specialty groconcept to eeds of all cu

raffic signals

affic pacing itions without

to a speed artment has ng overhead s

ras

t

s

tion

ng elements o

s an interdiefining custots, and then.

oups into a production

ustomers wit

s that are co

s a traffic cot an elaborat

that providefrequently

sign panels.

Concept oDynamic D

organized to

sciplinary apomer needs a proceeding

team efforto operatio

th the goal of

ordinated to

ontrol technte and difficues approximused this te


2

achieve one

pproach andand required

with design

t forming aon. Systemsf providing a

o achieve the

ique to slowult detour orately 20-30

echnique for

2.

Thforstrneconcontim

Sethesum

In facelebetqu

Thconrolprofieregcouand

1B1B1B1BPurpose

e purpose ofr ITS priorityrategies incleded to supnstruction pnstruction pr

me for drivers

veral significe next five ymmarized be

- I-95 Wi

- I-95 Rig

- I-95 Ov

addition to tcilities to alteement of an atter route deality of life in

is project wngestion scele in definingoject from deld. This concgional transpunty and cityd rescue dep

2.1. 14B14B14B14BSys

The concepthe ITS sysof updatinsynthesizinconsists ofthe “V” consystem verdefinition t

f this project corridors in ude dynamic

pport regionarojects on I-rograms. Thes through con

cant construyears. These elow:

dening and R

gid Pavemen

verland Bridg

these major ernate routeactive facilitiecisions to mn North Florid

ill establish enarios. The g the needs efining and scept of operportation andy public workpartments, an

stems Engin

pt of operatiostem deploymg the regio

ng the desig testing, impnnects the twrification. Tho the system

is to preparthe North Fl

c detouring al mobility g95 and how e ultimate aingested area

ction projectprojects will

Reconstructio

nt Rehabilitat

ge Replaceme

transportatios during trafes managem

minimize theda.

the alternatconcept of oof the projepecifying theations documd public works departmennd emergenc

neering “V”

ons has beenment. The “Vnal ITS archn for the ov

plementationwo sides of “e systems en

m operation a

re an evaluatlorida Transpand travele

goals. Specifuse of ITS am of the pro

as in the nort

ts are planne have a sign

on: Internatio

tion: SR 9A/I

ent: Atlantic

on projects, ffic incidents

ment strategyir travel time

e routes foroperations isect and its oe needs of thment has berks agencies nts, emergeny medical se

n developed t” consists ofhitecture, coverall systemn, operation,“V” by implengineering “V

and maintena

tion and asseportation Plar informatiofically, this and parallel roject is to actheast Florid

ed for the I-9nificant impac

onal Golf Par

-295 to Atla

Boulevard to

the need to and other n

y. These strate, thereby, r

r drivers durs a critical plutcome. Sta

he project toen developesuch as, the

cy operationrvices.

to be consistf two distinctoncept explom, and startand mainten

ementing theV” covers th

ance.

essment of aanning Organon using traiproject will routes can mchieve congea region.

95 corridor ict on region

rkway to SR 9

ntic Bouleva

o Fuller Warr

provide dynon recurringtegies can alreducing air

ring traffic inlanning stagekeholders ar

o integration ed by the Noe Florida De

n centers, reg

tent with thet sides as shooration, devting implemenance of thee system valihe entire proj

ctive facilitynization (TPOilblazers andalso consid

mitigate the rstion mitigat

in the North al traffic and

9A/I-295

ard

ren Bridge

amic detourg forms of colso be used tquality emis

ncidents as e where the re involved aand verificat

orth Florida Tepartment ofgional law en

e FHWA’s sysown in Figureeloping the entation in te overall systidation plan, ject life cycl

Concept oDynamic D

y managemenO) ITS Masterd other techer the effecregional imption and imp

Florida TPOd transporta

ing of trafficongestion is ao inform driv

ssions and im

well as durinstakeholder

at various sttion of the syTPO, in assof Transportanforcement a

stem engineee 1. The left sconcept of

the field. Thtem. The cendevice testie ranging fro


3

nt strategiesr Plan. Thesehnologies ascts of majoract of theseroved travel

region overtion and are

c from majoran importantvers to makemproving the

ng recurrings play a keytages of theystem in theociation withtion (FDOT),

agencies, fire

ering “V” forside consists

operations,e right side

ntral core ofng plan, andom the need

*Sourc

The FHWA of successdevelopmevalidation w

Systems endevelopmeboth the bumeets the the project

2.2. 15B15B15B15BDoc

The concepthe system

Section 3. in this sect

Section 4. discussed i

Section 5. during detotraveler inf

Section 6. briefly alon

Section 7. discussed i

Section 8. device opeprogram, a

ce: Systems Eng

defines systsful systemsnt cycle, dowhile conside

ngineering innt process thusiness and tuser needs. life cycle.

cument Out

pt of operati will behave

System Overion.

State of Pran this section

Dynamic Detour implemeformation, tra

Event and Ing with the ty

Stakeholden detail in th

Operational erates are dind existing IT

Fi

gineering for Int

tem engineer. It focuses

ocumenting rering the com

ntegrates all hat proceedsthe technicaSystems eng

tline

ons will act and interact

rview: Projec

actice Reviewn.

tour System entation suchaffic manage

ncident Typype of inciden

ers’ Roles ais section as

and Supportscussed in dTS network.

igure 1. Syst

elligent Transpo

ring as an int on definingrequirements

mplete proble

disciplines as from concel needs of al

gineering pro

as a referenwith the end

ct definition

w: Nationwid

Incident Mah as, detectiement, and af

es: In this snts such as, c

and Responss it pertains t

t Environmedetail in this

tems Engine

ortation System

terdisciplinarg customer s, and then em.

and specialtypt to productl customers

ocesses ident

nce documend users. Follo

and scope a

de state of t

nagement Prion, verificatfter action re

section the pcatastrophic

sibilities: Tho their roles

nt: The instis section inc

eering “V”

m, Federal Highw

ry approach needs and proceeding

y groups intotion to operawith the goatify the role

t for the staowing is the s

nd existing s

the practice

rocess: The ttion, notificaeview will be

planned and , major, inter

e stakeholdin dynamic d

itutional andcluding, traff

way Administrat

and means trequired fuwith design

o a team effoation. Systemal of providinof stakehold

akeholders tosectional out

system back

summary on

traffic incideation, respon

discussed br

unplanned ermediate, and

ders’ roles adetour syste

technical enfic managem

Concept oDynamic D

ion

to enable thenctionality e

n synthesis

ort forming ams engineerinng a quality pders as the k

o provide deline of this d

ground will b

n similar pro

ent managemnse, clearancriefly in this s

events will bd minor.

and responsm implement

nvironment iment center,


4

e realizationearly in theand system

a structuredng considersproduct that

key aspect in

tails on howocument:

be discussed

jects will be

ment processce, recovery,section.

be discussed

sibilities aretation.

in which theroad ranger

Section 9. S

9.1. Dev

9.2. Co

9.3. Co

9.4. Po

9.5. De

9.6. Art

9.7. Sys

Section 10.consideredimpact.

Section 11. system opsystem andaction revie

Section 12Internation

System Depl

vice consider

rridor consid

st considerat

wer supply c

vice commun

terial signal t

stem interfac

. Operationafor detour o

Standard Operation that

d resource deew.

. I-95 Casenal Golf Parkw

oyment: The

rations

derations

tions

consideration

nication cons

timing modif

ce considera

al Scenarios:operation, wh

perating Proct includes imeployment, d

e Study: Thway and Fulle

following ar

ns

siderations

ication consi

tions

This sectiohich includes

cedures: Thismplementatioecision supp

is section oer Warren Br

eas will be di

iderations

on outlines tsingle segme

s section outon plan oveort system, e

outlines the idge.

iscussed in d

the three opent impact, m

tlines the vaerview, respoescalation an

system pla

detail in this s

perational scmultiple segm

arious aspectonder orientnd de-escalat

an for the

Concept oDynamic D

section:

cenarios thatment impact

ts of the dyntation and ction procedu

I-95 segme


5

t have beenand corridor

namic detourcoordination,re, and after

ent between

3.

2B2B2B2BSystem O

3.1. 16B16B16B16BPro

The scope boundary. which incluNorth Florimillion. IncJacksonvillNassau CouTown of Or

The four mDiversion raccess higCopies of d

3.2. 17B17B17B17BSys

In April 20partnershipand other m

Est

Det

Gui

The study aSt. Johns, aregional ITS

Overview

oject Definit

of the projecThis project

udes all of Duida TPO servcluded withile Beach andunty; St. Augange Park in

major limitedoute maps hhways, exceiversion rout

stem Backg

006, the Norp with the Jamembers of t

ablish the re

termine the s

de the Coalit

area encompas well as neS Master Pla

tion and Sco

ct is limited tis focused

uval County avice area mn the bound

d the Town ofgustine and S Clay County

Figure 2

d access highave been prpt for SR 2te maps for I

round

rth Florida Tacksonville Tthe First Coa

gion's vision

steps needed

tion in coordi

passed four cighboring co

an was compl

ope

to the North on limited aand portions ap. This aredary are thf Baldwin, in St. Augustiney.

2. North Flo

ghways in thepared by th02, which is-95, I-10 and

TPO, then caTransportatiost ITS Coalit

and goals fo

d to achieve t

inating, integ

counties withunties - Alacleted in July

Florida TPO access highw

of Clay, Nasa encompas

he cities of Duval Count

e Beach in St

orida TPO Se

he project rehe FDOT Dists under cons I-295/SR 9A

alled the Firson Authorityion, develope

or intelligent

those goals

grating, and p

hin the Northchua, Baker, , 2010. This

service areaways within tssau and St. sses 1,838 sq

Atlantic Bety; Fernandint. Johns Cou

ervice Area

egion are I-9trict 2 Trafficsideration foA are provide

st Coast Me(JTA), FDOT

ed a Regiona

transportati

prioritizing p

h Florida TPOBradford, Flaupdate inclu

a that falls wthe North FlJohns, Counquare miles each, Neptunna Beach andnty; and Gre

a Map

95, I-10, I-29c Operationsor developmed in Append

etropolitan PT District 2, al ITS Master

ion systems

projects

O boundary - agler, Putnamded a review

Concept oDynamic D

ithin the FDOorida TPO s

nties. Figure and a popu

ne Beach, Jd the Town oen Cove Spr

95/SR 9A as Office for tent of diver

dix A.

Planning Orgathe City of JPlan to:

Clay, Duval, m and Union.w on mileston


6

OT District 2service area,2 shows thelation of 1.2Jacksonville,f Callahan inings and the

and SR 202.hese limited

rsion routes.

anization, inJacksonville,

Nassau, and. An updatednes achieved

from the timplementa

RevFloconand

Indroaand

Proof ttransys

PrioTheroasecsys

ITSFlo

ITSandloca

This projecoperations

The followifour limited

Other corriarea are lis

- McD

- US

- SR

- SR

- US

- Cen

A detailed darea is prov

ime the origation plans. T

view of Existrida region a

nducted on thd completed I

dividual Systedway in the

d maintaining

ogrammed ITthe projects nsit signal prtems, and a

iority Corridoe priority cordway section

ctions of thetems with no

S Needs and Crida region a

S Maintenancd needs corration: http://

ct builds on tdocument fo

ng table bried access high

Roadw

I-95 I-10 I-295/SRSR 202

dor segmentsted below:

Duff Avenue:

10/Atlantic B

152/Baymea

115/Southsid

17/Roosevel

ntral Busines

discussion onvided in the l

ginal master The updated

ting ITS in thand reviewedhe five year ITS projects.

tems Evaluatregion. This

g agencies of

TS Projects idinclude free

riority, a comregional traf

ors for ITS Drridors for ITns that could

e roadways wo ITS system

Cost Estimatnd the cost e

ce included thridor project/www.northfl

he work comor a dynamic

efly summarihways that ar

way ITCovePartiParti

R 9A PartiNone

ts with existi

: between Be

Boulevard: be

adows Road:

de Boulevard

t Boulevard:

ss District (CB

n existing, prater sections

plan was deRegional ITS

he region, whd it with the plan, which c

tion was persection iden the deploye

dentified proeway and artmmuter servific managem

Deployment idTS deploymed benefit fromwith ITS, ad in place.

tes identifiedestimates for

he forms tha. The ITS moridatpo.com

mpleted as a detour syste

izes the ITS re envisioned

Table 1. ITS C

TS rageal I-295al I-95 tal South

e -

ng ITS comm

eaver Street a

etween Beac

between San

: between SR

between I-2

BD): Downtow

rogrammed, s of this docu

eveloped andS Master Plan

hich identifiestakeholder

classified pre

rformed to tified the ITSd fiber optic

ogrammed ITterial managce program,

ment center.

dentified priont were devem ITS deployditional dep

d ITS corridorr funding of t

at should be maintenance fm/its-form/.

part of the Rem within the

coverage avd to be equip

Communicat

south intercto Chaffee Rohwest Quadra

munication inf

and Rooseve

ch Boulevard

n Jose Boulev

R 202 and Ph

95 and Kings

wn Jacksonv

and ongoingument.

d set new ITn was divided

ed the extents involved wevious ITS m

identify ITS S coverage onetwork in t

TS projects inement systeRoad Range

ority corridoeloped by thyment. Theseloyment alo

rs that wouldthe projects.

completed bform can be

Regional ITS e North Flori

vailable in thpped with dyn

tion Coverage

Limits

change to Duoad ant I-10 to I-9

frastructure

elt Boulevard

and SR A1A

vard and SR

hilips Highwa

sley Avenue

ville CCTVs o

ITS deploym

TS milestoned into the foll

t of ITS deplwith ITS deplmilestones int

elements dof the region he region.

n the northeaems, ITS signer services, r

ors for ITS dehe stakeholdee priority corng ITS corri

d need ITS co

by the stakee filled out a

Master Planda TPO servi

e North Flornamic detour

e

uval County li

95

within the N

d

9A

ay

on State, Unio

ment in the N

Concept oDynamic D

es for five- alowing six pa

oyment in thoyment. Theto programm

deployed on and listed th

ast Florida rnal controlleoad weather

eployment iners on a maprridors includidors, and n

overage in th

holders for eat the follow

n to develop aice area.

rida TPO servr systems:

ine

North Florida

on and Bay S

orth Florida


7

and ten-yeararts:

he northeaste review was

med, ongoing,

each majorhe operating

egion. Somers, cameras,

r information

n the region.p identifyingde additionalew roadway

he northeast

each prioritywing website

a concept of

vice area on

TPO service

Streets

TPO service

4.

A sdetDeagedu

3B3B3B3BState of

state of the ptouring traff

epartment of ency studiesring incident

4.1. 18B18B18B18BReg

This stratehas prepareupdated evmaps provimaps, no mplan. Thesalternate rEnhancemealternate ro

1. Conto tlaneeas

2. Conwill

3. Conmeewithrou

4. Consele

The currendivert traffincident is knowledge jurisdiction

The FDOT motorists alocal 511 catime.

4.2. 19B19B19B19BFlo

FDOT Distrwith the I-7lane blockadrivers arechoose an intersectiospecial eve16-inch cha

Practice R

practice literfic for traffic

Transportats and unpubls using ICM s

gional Exist

gy is not imped detour ma

very six montide alternate

major concerne detour ma

route corridoent opportunoutes include

nsider establthe stakeholde closure and

sed and the o

nsider option provide som

nsider condueting will proh local authote.

nsider periodecting or mod

nt state of prfic based on

cleared froof the road

nal boundary

District 2 uabout the incalls. However

rida DOT’s

rict 4 install75 and I-95 ages on arte alerted aheaalternate ro

n which mayents such as aracters.

Review

rature reviewc incident mtion (USDOT)ished reportstrategies.

ing State of

plemented fuaps for severths and are se routes basns were noteaps consideors. Also, thnities that we:

ishing a miniders. For exad/or congest

open road pol

ns to guide mme options fo

ucting periodovide an oppoorities and re

dically referrdifying a det

ractice by th information

om the roadway segmeninformation,

ses Dynamicident on the

r, no alternat

Arterial DM

ed 34 artericorridors. Thrial roads asad of time beoute. Like fry serve as anthe Super B

w was conducanagement.) Integrated s chronicle n

f Practice

ully at this timral major higshared with ted on exit n

ed. The mapsred schools,ese detour

would increas

imum and maample, a detotion build up;licy timeline

motorists bacr this.

dic meetingsortunity for tesponders; as

ring to FHWAour route.

he law enforn available away. The in

nt where the information

c Message Sfreeway bein

te route infor

S

ial DMS in Bhese arterials well as on efore approareeway DMSn alternate rowl. These a

cted to underThis concepCorridor Ma

national app

me in the nohways withinthe traffic incnumbers ands are well des, hospitals, routes are sse the suppo

aximum timeour route will; similarly, deis met.

ck to their or

s with localthe lead agens well as prov

A’s “Alterna

cement agent hand durinformation a

e incident ocfrom the TM

Signs (DMS), ng travelled. rmation is di

Broward Counl DMS displafreeways. Th

aching the fre, these arteroute. These rterial DMS

rstand how opt falls underanagement (Iroaches tow

ortheast Florn the Districtcident mana roadway sesigned to setraffic signa

set for perioort from loc

elines of detol be implemeetour activity

riginal path.

stakeholdersncy to establvide feedbac

te Route Ha

ncies and otng traffic inct hand inclu

ccurred, instMC, local 511,

where availThe incident

isseminated

nty, Florida y incident inhe advantageeway systerial DMS aresigns are al

are smaller p

other states hr the categoICM) ITS pro

wards managi

ida region. Ht 2 boundarygement team

egments. Aftrve the purpals, police sodic review al authoritie

our activitiesented after sy should be l

This concep

s specificallylish communck or critique

andbook” for

her traffic incident, or bludes the phitutional knoetc.

lable, to disst informationthrough any

along arterianformation toge of these aem, which wile installed ilso used for profile signs

Concept oDynamic D

handle similaory of the Unogram. Publising and oper

However, FDOy. These detom in CD formter reviewingpose of a dynstations, etcand renewal

es on wide u

s that are copecified timelifted when c

t of operatio

y for detourication and r

e on the choi

r any update

ncident respock traffic fysical and g

owledge and

seminate infn is also disse of these sou

al corridors o let drivers arterial DMS l allow sufficn advance omessage powith two lin


8

ar concept ofnited Statedshed papers,rating traffic

OT District 2our maps are. The detour

g the detournamic detour. within thel as needed.use of these

mmunicatede duration ofcongestion is

on document

r maps. Thisrelationshipsce of detour

es or before

onders is toflow until angeographical

experience,

formation toeminated viaurces at this

intersectingknow aboutsigns is the

cient time toof the majorosting duringes of twelve

4.3. 20B20B20B20BFHW

In May 200and how trathe alternausing an altraffic flow

E

Pla

nn

ed

Eve

nt

Mm

P

Un

pla

nn

ed

Eve

nt

Ts

E

Ar

Ed

WA’s Altern

06 FHWA pubaffic and hig

ate route withternate routare provided

Event Type

Major roadwamaintenance

Planned spec

Traffic incidenpilled load, d

Emergency ro

Adverse weatain, sun glare

Emergency (edisaster, hum

Figu

*Source

nate Route H

blished an Alhway agencih the stakehe. The scenad in Table 2 b

Table 2: Con

ay constructio

ial events

nt (e.g., crasdebris)

oad work

ther (e.g., snoe)

e.g., severe wman-caused in

ure 1. FDOT

e: FDOT SunGuid

Handbook

lternate Roues can impleolders that p

arios when thbelow:

ngestion Impa

on and

h, disableme

ow, ice, fog, h

weather, natuncident)

District 4 A

de Disseminator

te Handbookement them. participate ohe alternate

acts of Plann

Eff

-

-

-

nt, -

-

heavy -

ural -

Arterial DMS

k that descriThis handbo

or get involveroutes can b

ned and Unpl

fect on Road

Closes trav

Creates sidspeed and c

Closes travto stage evevents).

Blocks trav

Blocks trav

Reduces veincreases hcapacity.

Renders ro(potentially

S

bes what altook describesed in the probe implement

anned Event

Capacity

vel lane(s) or

de friction, recapacity.

vel lane(s) or vent (typically

vel lane(s) or

vel lane(s) or

ehicle operatheadways, th

ad segmentsy).

Concept oDynamic D

ernate traffis the need foocess of detoted and their

ts

road segmen

educing traffi

road segmeny street use

road segmen

road segmen

ing speeds aus reducing

s impassable


9

c routes areor discussingouring trafficr impacts on

nts.

ic

nts

nts.

nts.

nd

This handb

1. Alte

2. Alteincl

3. Traimptraf

The alternaconsidered

- Pro

- Eas

- Saf

- Hei

- Num

- Con

- Tra

- Num

- Tra

- Pav

- Typ

- Exis

- Per

- Gra

- Typ

- Ava

- Noi

- Tra

- Air

- Abi

- Ow

- Ava

- Ava

The alternadefining the

4.4. 21B21B21B21BUS

The USDOTManagemetransportat

1. Dal

2. Hou

3. Min

4. Mon

ook categori

ernate route

ernate routeluding inform

affic manageplementationffic to, from a

ate route ha when optimi

oximity of alt

se of access t

fety of motor

ght, weight,

mber of trave

ngestion indu

affic condition

mber of signa

avel time on a

vement and b

pe and intens

stence of sch

rcentage of h

ades on alter

pe and intens

ailability of fu

se pollution

ansit bus acco

quality

lity to contro

nership of ro

ailability of IT

ailability of IT

ate route hae roles of diff

DOT’s Integ

T had selectent (ICM) stration. The eigh

las, Texas (U

uston, Texas

nneapolis, Min

ntgomery Co

zes the alter

selection: ch

plan develomation on alte

ement planni and for traand on the al

andbook highizing the list

ernate route

to/from alter

rists on alter

width, and tu

el lanes/capa

uced on alter

ns on alterna

alized interse

alternate rou

bridge condit

sity of reside

hools and hos

heavy vehicle

nate route

sity of comme

uel, rest stop

ommodation

ol timing of t

oad

TS surveillan

TS informatio

ndbook is a ferent stakeh

grated Corri

ed eight “Piotegy deploymht pioneer IC

US 75)

(I-10 and US

nnesota (I-39

ounty, Maryla

rnate route p

hoosing an op

pment: deveernate route

ing: planningaffic control, lternate rout

hlights the fof candidate

e to closed ro

rnate route

nate route

urning restric

acity of alter

rnate route

ate routes

ections, stop

ute

tions on alter

ntial develop

spitals on alt

es (e.g., truck

ercial develo

ps, and food f

raffic signals

ce equipmen

on dissemina

useful tool tholders durin

dor Manage

neer Sites” ament and tes

CM sites are l

290)

94)

and (I-270)

planning phas

ptimal altern

loping informimplementat

g for informincluding ca

te.

following liste corridors:

oadway

ctions on alte

nate route

signs, and u

rnate route

pment on alte

ternate route

ks, buses. RV

opment on alt

facilities alon

s on alternate

nt on alternat

ation equipme

to help narrong the alterna

ement Prog

across the costing in co-opisted below:

ses into the f

nate route fro

mation to inction.

mation to beapacity enha

t of criteria

ernate routes

unprotected l

ernate route

e

Vs) on route f

ternate route

ng alternate

e route

te route

ent on altern

ow down the ate route sel

ram

ountry to actperation with

following thre

om the list of

corporate in

e disseminatancements n

for alternat

s

eft turns on

from which tr

e

routes

nate route

alternate rolection proce

t as test siteh the respect

Concept oDynamic D

ee steps:

f candidate r

the alternate

ted to motoneeded to ac

te route sele

alternate rou

raffic is to be

oute selectioesses.

s for Integraive state dep


10

outes.

e route plan,

orists duringccommodate

ection to be

ute

e diverted

on as well as

ted Corridorpartments of

5. Oak

6. San

7. San

8. Sea

These sitesmany otheexample, rebelow show

The USDOTdemonstratresults fromprogram inmodeling:

1. Tra

2. Tra

3. Inci

4. Fue

5. Cor

The benefit

kland, Califor

n Antonio, Te

n Diego, Calif

attle, Washin

s were selecer corridors eal time signws the existin

T ICM progrtion and evam San Diego,n fiscal year

avel time

avel delay tim

ident duratio

el consumptio

rridor capacit

t-cost analys

rnia (I-880)

exas (I-10)

fornia (I-15)

gton (I-5)

cted based oacross the al control, h

ng infrastruct

Figure

ram is underaluation at th, CA, Dallas, 2009 to 20

me and predic

on and freque

on and pollut

ty utilization

sis for high de

on USDOT’s nation and aigh occupancture assets in

e 1. Corridor

rway and is he selected TX, and Minn

010. The follo

ctability

ency

tion reductio

(vehicle and

emand major

belief that tall possess cy vehicle anntegrated in

r Assets Int

in its thirdpioneer site

neapolis, MNowing corrido

n

d traveler thr

r incidents is

they contain infrastructur

nd value pricICM.

egrated in I

d and final ses. The analy

were compleor performan

roughput)

shown in Fig

the charactre assets thing, bus rapi

ICM

stage (fiscal ysis, modelineted as a parnce measure

gure 2.

Concept oDynamic D

teristics thathat can enabd transit, etc

year 2010 ng and simulrt of second es were used


11

t representsble ICM. Forc. The figure

to 2012) oflation (AMS)stage of the

d to conduct

The numbepositive foinformationduring highunder diffe

The dollar there is a lagreater the

4.5. 22B22B22B22BMin

This projeccities of Blproject waperpendicuseveral ITStraffic survaugment frareas:

Figure 2.

ers on the bar the high dn, transit trah demand anrent operatio

Figure 3

amount in tharge amounte benefit.

nnesota DOT

t was starteoomington, Rs implementlar arterial s

S technologieveillance. Thereeway capa

Summary o

rs representdemand and aveler informd major incidonal scenario

3. Overall IC

he figure rep of cost savi

T’s I-494 In

d in 1994 byRichfield, andted on an 8streets crosss including a

ese deployedacity during

of Benefit C

t the benefitsmajor incid

mation and sdent type of os.

CM Benefit u

presents costng per incide

tegrated Co

forging a pad Edina to te

8-mile segmesing five jurisadaptive ram technologiemajor incide

ost for High

s to cost ratient type sceignal coordinscenario. Th

under Differ

t savings dueent type. The

orridor Man

artnership beest the concent of I-494sdictional boup metering, as were used ents. Severa

h Demand w

io after ICM enario. The nation resulthe following

rent Operat

e to ICM impe greater traf

nagement

etween Minnecept of ICM a4 encompassundaries. Thadaptive trafto better lev

al benefits w

with Major In

implementatfigure showt in a positivfigure shows

tional Condi

plementationffic demand a

esota DOT, Hacross jurisdsing four paris project invffic signals, mverage the pwere identifie

Concept oDynamic D

ncident

tion. All the ns that highwve return ofs the overall

tions

n. Figure 3 inand incident

Hennepin Couictional bounrallel streetsvolved the a

motorist inforarallel streeted in the fo


12

numbers areway travelerf investment ICM benefit

ndicates thatseverity the

unty and thendaries. Thiss and sevenpplication ofrmation, andt capacity to

ollowing four

1. Instcooare

2. Sysandshifcomfunlimi

3. Sysdepper

4. Sysimpin cand

4.6. 23B23B23B23BMic

The Michigbetween MstakeholdeSoutheast Michigan Sjurisdictioncorridors fconstant troutcomes itowards a manageme

4.7. 24B24B24B24BSim

Several simtransportatalternate ro

The fist simindicated tcongestionto 56 percfor Advanctime for bemodel to cseverity, lopreviously medium levwas hardernetwork de

The secondmodel resusystems caindicated tstudy is a pAn analysisstrategies. calculated ICM applied

titutional beoperation anda.

stem performd resources fft on adaptimmunication ction as desitation can b

stem deploymployment chrtaining to int

stem impactsproved trafficcongested cod integrated i

chigan DOT’

gan DOT impM-102 and Bars, includingMichigan Co

State Policens. This projefor incident raffic flow ts still pendincommon gont and opera

mulation Stu

mulation stution system. outes during

mulation stuhat using a in the Disne

ent. This simed Road Teleefore and afcalculate basow, medium, defined typi

vels of saturar to balance

emand was ve

d simulation ults indicatedan help balahat the benepart of USDOs frameworkThat framewa 10-year be

d during high

enefits: this d coordinatio

mance: this pfor enhancedve signal conetwork at

sired. Howeve overcome.

ment: the proallenges. Thtegrated inte

s: the overac operation aorridors. Thisinter-jurisdic

’s I-75 Integ

plemented anldwin Road. T the Road Council of Go, City of A

ect forged paand non-inchroughout t

ng. However,oal of integraation.

udies

udies have Two such stincident sce

dy was conddecision sup

eyland area cmulation studematics) simter impleme

seline saturaand high. A cal traffic acation than lo when the nery small.

study was cod that the ICMance traffic efit to cost rOT’s “Pioneek was develowork is calle

enefit of appr demand maj

project synon; and contr

project provid traffic manontrol among that time, ver, with all

oject technolhis formed aer-jurisdiction

ll system imand use of uns project als

ctional traffic

grated Corri

n ICM projecThis project Commission overnments, uburn Hills,

artnerships bident condithe corridor. it has alreadating arteria

been condutudies requirenarios.

ducted in Anpport tool tocould reduce dy used the ulation modentation scen

ation flow rasymbolic pa

ctivity in theow and high lnetwork dem

onducted in M strategies

flow and eatio of the inr Sites” for ped to evalu

ed the Analyroximately $jor incident s

nergized theributed to en

ided the staagement andg the stakesome of th

l the techno

ogy deployma base of snal applicatio

mpact due tonderutilized so forged pac managemen

idor Manage

ct to optimiwas led by thfor Oakland Suburban MCity of Tr

between thestions. The pu

This projecdy forged a sal and freew

ucted to anre special me

naheim, Califoo select altetravel time Dynasmart (el to measurenarios. Actuates of the cttern was us

e network. Thevels of satu

mand was clo

San Franciscpromoting in

enhance corrntegrated stICM implemeuate the potesis, Modeling570 million

scenarios.

e institutionanhancing the

keholders wd operationsholders. Wite adaptive

ological brea

ment spannedstrong lessoon of differen

o deployed teroadways wirtnerships a

nt strategies

ement

ze capacity he Michigan County, Ro

Mobility Autroy, local pose jurisdictiourpose of th

ct is still unstrong inter-

way capacitie

nalyze the bention due to

ornia in 200ernate trafficby 2 to 29 p(Dynamic Nee average an

al traffic coucorridor and sed to matchhe simulationuration. The ose to satura

co, Californiantegration amridor perfortrategies ranentation on aential impacg, and Simulwith approxi

al and orgaoverall trans

ith valuable s. It also paveth some chasignal contr

akthroughs i

d a five year ns learned nt ITS techno

echnologies ithin the reg

across inter-j.

of over 25 DOT in colla

oad Commisshority for Rolice departons to integrhe project wderway and -jurisdictionaes for better

benefits of o their findin

01 by USDOTc control plapercent and detwork Assignd total netwunt data was

rank them h the currentn results wereason is thation, and h

a, in 2009 bymong freewamance. Also

nges from 7:1a 34-mile segct of indepenation framewimately half

Concept oDynamic D

nizational resportation sy

infrastructued a way for

allenges in trol technologin the recen

period and faand deploym

ologies.

on this projion to augmjurisdictiona

mile long I-boration withsion of MacoRegional Traments, andate freeway

was to creatthe analysi

al partnershipr transporta

ICM strateggs related to

T. The simulaans during nodecrease stonment Simu

work travel tis input in theinto three ct network core most effee demand/caad limited e

y USDOT. Thays, arterialso, the simul1 to 25:1. Thigment of I-8

ndent and cowork. Overalof that attrib


13

elationships,ystem in the

ure elementsr a paradigmthe unstablegies did notnt past, this

aced severalment advice

ect includesent capacityl boundaries

-75 corridorh many localomb County,ansportation,

other localand arterial

te a steady,s of projectp that workstion system

gies on theo benefits of

ation resultson-recurringp time by 15lation Modelme and stope simulationategories of

ondition withective duringapacity ratioeffects when

e simulations, and transitation modelis simulation

880 corridor.ombined ICMl, the modelbuted to the

5.

ThimproverEaim

4B4B4B4BDynamic

e traffic inplementationocess implemrification, noch of theseplementation

5.1. 25B25B25B25BDet

The detectresponse athat ultimaand cameraThese devicdown or csurveillanceTMC operat

5.2. 26B26B26B26BVer

Once the cverificationRoad Rangnext step tfor the incithe respons

There are t

1. Loc

c Detour S

ncident mann. Dynamic dmentation of otification, ree elements n. Figure 4 ou

tection

ion process agencies. Thetely leads toas that provces are used

congestion me. There are tors, for exam

rification

congestion in process eiters in the vico respond todent. Detailese activity.

two types of

cation verific

ystem Inc

nagement pdetour system

detour activesponse, travis describedutlines the p

Figu

is the first se first sympto delay on thvide continuo to determin

may be alertseveral othe

mple, phone

incident is dher by crosscinity. The tro incidents. Ted incident in

incident veri

cation — inv

cident Man

process desm managemevities. The prveler informad in the forocess order

re 4. Standa

step in identtom is the tre original ro

ous real-timee delay and tted to the er ways in wcalls from tr

detected by s verifying inravel time anThe verificatinformation v

fications:

volves identif

nagement

cribes the ent is similarrocess is desation, trafficllowing sect

r.

ard Operati

ifying the prraffic slowdoute. On majoe traffic infotravel-time oTMC operathich traffic caveling publi

the TMC opnformation und delay infoion process i

verification w

fying the ge

Process

user orienr to traffic inscribed by thmanagemen

tions geared

ng Processe

roblem locatown on the ror roadways,ormation andon the originators automatcongestion aic, patrolling

perators, thsing camera

ormation shois a vital step

would allow re

eographic an

nted processcident manahe similar ei

nt, recovery, d towards d

es

ion that reqroadway, foll FDOT has in

d video feedsal and detoutically or th

and incidentsofficer, Road

ey should im feeds or usuld also be vp in initiatingesponse age

nd physical

Concept oDynamic D

s for dynagement in opght elementsand after ac

dynamic det

uires attentiowed by the

nstalled traffs to the TMCr routes. Thehrough regus can be deted Rangers, m

mmediately ing patrollingverified to prg a proper reencies to be p

location of


14

amic detourperation ands: detection,ction review.tour system

ion from thee congestionfic detectorsC operators.e traffic slowlar roadwayected by the

media, etc.

switch to ag officers orroceed on toesponse planprepared for

the incident

(ma

2. Incidela

5.3. 27B27B27B27BNot

The notificverifying agdetour actiabout the inagency typto the resmaintenancquick respo

5.4. 28B28B28B28BRes

Transportaagencies refor the localternate trrespond foit is their replan shoulddetour. Detunder the r

As a part osuch a wayoriginal patactivated bproper ageroute shoul

5.5. 29B29B29B29BCle

The clearandetour liftireturning rof any hindThe detouroriginal rou

5.6. 30B30B30B30BRec

The recovethe recovertime when reduction inIn additiondetour opecooperationinclude re-owork. If theperformingdamaged roor transpor

5.7. 31B31B31B31BTra

Traffic manroutes. A pproblem armessages s

ainline, ramp

ident detail vay and asses

tification

cation procegency shouldivities. Congencident with ically dependsponsible agce responsibonse.

sponse

tion agencieesponsible focal agencies raffic signal r assistance esponsibility d consider thtour plans caresponse per

f the responsy that it proth with less dbased on the ency memorald be implem

earance

nce process ng process. oadway cond

drance to nor route advisute is started

covery

ery process bry process incongestion sn delays, the, the traffic eration is a n is desired opening trave damage to repair woroadway fromrtation office

affic Manage

nagement is fpre-planned rea on an ashould be pr

, intersection

verification —ssing the seg

ss is similard pull out theestion incidethe details c

ds on the extgencies depility. An early

es and local or the roadwa

that operatplan for detoupon the lawto assess an

he current pan be implemsonnel guida

se activity anovides motordelay and tratravel time a

andum of undented at this

is essentiallyHowever, it

ditions to norrmal traffic

sory should cd.

begins immedncludes estimstarts to easen the detour

signal planscombined eto avoid an

vel lanes to tthe roadway

k during nom the travellie personnel.

ement

facilitated bydetour routlternate rourovided well

n), direction o

— involves idment impact

r to the trae contact list ent notificatiocollected in thtent of congepends on thy and proact

public worksay to implemte and maintour activitiesw enforcemend solicit reqphysical and mented by ma

nce where si

nd dependingrists an altevel time. A d

and delay infderstanding s time to acco

y a traffic incis an impor

rmal. The maflow and opecontinue to d

diately after tmating delay

e on the freer operation s should reve

effort betweeny further dehe motoristsy is major ann-peak traveng public. Th

y providing tie, where avte leading bin advance

of travel, nea

dentifying theted.

affic incidentof the respo

on is the prohe detection estion and dehe jurisdictiive notificati

s departmenent the detotain the tra

s. Depending ent agency’suired resourctraffic condi

anually turninigns are unav

g on congestrnate route

decision shouormation colis in place, tommodate a

cident managtant process

ain objective en travel landisplay durin

the clearancand travel tieway. If therhould be lifteert back to ten different elay. For tras as well as pnd requires lel, preferablhe recovery w

imely traveleailable, shouback to theof the diver

arest mile ma

e reason for

t managemeonse agenciesocess of info and verifica

elay experienonal boundaion to all the

nts should coour plan for thffic signalson the naturrequest. Oncces to implemition of the ng on the devailable.

tion severity to get arou

uld be made allected fromthe alternatedditional dem

gement procs which incoof the cleares to the tra

ng this proce

e activity is me from the

re is a signified and all thethe normal t

jurisdictionaffic incidentperforming slane closure ly during nigwork is most

er informatiould be imple

original roursion point u

arkers, etc.

congestion,

ent notificatis that would

orming the prtion process

nced by the mary and ro

e responding

oordinate wihe segment oin the regiore of congestce the respoment detour detour routetour signs w

the detour sund the congat this point the original a

e traffic signmand due to

cess and has orporates all ance processaveling publi

ess until the

completed. Fe inception ofcant improvee detour signtime of day s, hence efft managemeshoulder clea

for a longerght time, aftly done by l

on and providmented to d

ute. In ordersing dynami

Concept oDynamic D

determining

ion process be needed t

roper respones. The need

motorist. Theadway operagencies is t

ith the law eof impact. It

on to make tion, other anding agencyoperation. T

e before impwith flashing m

should be impgestion and if the detourand detoured

nal timing fodetour activ

a passive imactivities th

s is to clear tc as quickly recovery pro

For the detouf detour operement in travns should be operation. Tficient coordnt, the reco

an up and dar duration, thfter safely saw enforcem

ding acceptabdivert trafficr to do this,ic massage s


15

g travel time

in that theo implement

nse agenciesd to notify ane notificationrational andthe key for a

enforcementis importantavailable angencies mayy is notified,

The responseplementing amessages or

plemented inback to the

r needs to bed routes. If ar the detourity.

mpact on thehat facilitatethe roadwayas possible.

ocess of the

ur operation,ration to thevel time anddeactivated.

This stage ofdination andvery efforts

amage repairhen considersecuring thement officers

ble alternatec away from, the detoursigns, where

available aTraffic conwarning sig

Detour mainformationduring emehandling adaspect of tfor the detin such a w

5.8. 32B32B32B32BTra

Traveler inapproachinand up to tfreeway. TRespondersthe traffic messages sthrough the

Traveler incomparisonshould be Whenever athe travelinthose cases

5.9. 33B33B33B33BAft

It is importdetour opeimprove codiscuss traroute(s) fobenefit of tany sugges

nd by using trol devices

gns, etc. shou

ps should ben disseminatergencies shdditional traftraffic managour activity tay that the d

aveler Inform

formation is g the problethe minute t

Timely traves can be assmanagemen

signs, dyname traffic man

formation shns between oused at the

a reduction ing public. Ths, use of stat

ter Action R

tant for eachration. This p

oordination aaffic incidentr any changethe after actstions and fee

simple messuch as dyn

uld be utilized

e made avaiion. Where t

hould study ffic volume, agement durinto accommo

detoured traf

mation

the processem areas. Thi

ravel time inler informat

signed along nt center to

mic message sagement cen

hould be up-toriginal and e problem lon travel time

he availabilitytic signs with

Review

h agency to pplatform shond cooperatit managemees and to retion review pedback that m

sage or thronamic messad to forewarn

lable to the he detour mthe detour

and coordinang the detoudate additionffic is given p

of notifyingis is an activnformation ttion could hthe detour rdisseminate

signs, 511 andnter when ac

to-date and sdetour routeocation to ge on the origy of dynamic

h flashers, 511

participate inuld be used fion for futurent. This mee

eview standaprocess is tomay be recei

ough signs oage signs, pon drivers of t

general pubaps are not route before

ate with the lr process is nal traffic in priority to red

the travelinve process ofo aid them i

help reduce roadway wit traveler infd local mediativated durin

should displae. For this pugenerate upginal route occ message si1, or local rad

n the after acfor open disce incidents. Neting can alsrd operating facilitate opived.

or simple haortable changthe congestio

blic through available, thehand to enlocal traffic opreparing athe region. T

duce stop tim

ng public of tf detour actin making antraffic cong

hout ITS covformation toa. Emergencyng emergenc

ay accurate,urpose, the idates on trccurs, the infigns may be dio stations s

ction review cussion and sNortheast Flso be used tg procedurespen dialogue

nd gestures geable messon well in adv

a website oe agency im

nsure that thoperations on alternate tThe signal timmes and dela

he roadway vity, which p

n en-route degestion on verage to feeo the public y operation cies.

timely informin-field respoaffic incidenformation shlimited to o

should be uti

process to psharing resporida responto discuss os for successe among the

Concept oDynamic D

by on-scenesage signs, trvance of the

r other meaplementing dhe facility is

office. Anothetraffic signalming should y.

conditions inprovides drivecision to dethe impacteed traffic infvia portablecenters perfo

mation aboutonder or trafnts for travehould be dissonly certain rlized.

provide feedbonders’ point

nders meet br re-address

sful implemeresponders


16

e personnel.raffic cones,exit.

ans of publicdetour planss capable ofer importantl timing planbe designed

n advance ofvers a timelyetour off theed roadway.formation to changeableorm this role

t travel timeffic cameraseling public.

seminated toroadways. In

back on pastts of view to

bi-monthly tos the detourntation. Theand address

6.

Thand

5B5B5B5BEvent an

is section ded incident ty

6.1. 34B34B34B34BEve

Two differeFollowing a

6.1.1.

Plann

-

-

Theseon ththe ev

6.1.2.

Unpla

-

-

-

-

Thesethe in

6.2. 35B35B35B35BInc

Four differNortheast The incidenmajor incidactivation d

6.2.1.

Catasduratfrom Homeroute

-

-

-

-

-

6.2.2

Majorcoordincidenatur

nd Incident

escribes diffepes.

ent Types

ent types ofare the descr

71B71B71B71BPlanned

ned events in

Major road

Planned s

e planned eve extent of event duration

. 72B72B72B72BUnplan

anned events

Traffic inc

Emergenc

Adverse w

Emergenc

e unplanned ncident and m

ident Types

ent traffic inFlorida regiont types thadents that rudepending on

. 73B73B73B73B28BCatastr

strophic incidtion typically

agencies sueland Securite activation. C

Major brid

Wildfire-re

Weather-r

Crashes th

Acts of te

2. 74B74B74B74B29BMajor In

r incidents dination betwents and typire would requ

t Types

erent events

incidents aiptions of the

d Events

nclude, but ar

dway constru

pecial events

vents need grevent impact n.

ned Events

s include, but

cidents

cy road work

weather

cies

events requmay or may n

s

ncident typeon as describt may trigge

un over 90 mn the incident

rophic Incid

dents are nay ranging fromuch as the Sty, HAZMAT Catastrophic

dge damage

elated closur

related closu

hat have a si

rrorism or va

ncident

have an exween differenically requireuire alternate

and incident

re identifiedese events.

re not limited

uction and m

s

reater coordon traffic, w

t are not limit

uire spontanenot require in

s have beenbed below. Eaer implementminutes. Intet.

ent

tural or manm 12 hours tState Warnincontractors,

c incidents m

res

res such as m

gnificant env

andalism

xpected durant agencies ie setting up ae route activ

s when dyna

, which may

d to:

maintenance

ination beforwhich may or

ted to:

eous coordinnitiating the d

identified foach of thesetation of an

ermediate inc

n-made disaso several dang Point, Flo, and others.ay be caused

major storm

vironmental i

ation ranginincluding feda complete tration. Major

mic detours

y or may not

rehand, essemay not req

nation betwedetour plan d

or the trafficincident typalternate ro

cidents may

sters that incays. Catastroorida Depart. Incidents ofd by, but not

or hurricane

impact, such

g from 90 deral agencieraffic incidenincidents ma

may be impl

t require alt

ntially inter-quire initiatin

een differentdepending on

c incident mpes triggers doute or deto

y or may not

clude lane cloophic incidenttment of Enf this naturelimited to:

e

h as a signific

minutes toes. Major incnt managemeay be caused

Concept oDynamic D

emented bas

ternate route

-jurisdictionag a detour pl

agencies ton the event d

management different resour are catast require alte

osures with ts may requi

nvironmentale would requi

cant HAZMAT

o 12 hours cidents are loent area. Incid by, but not l


17

sed on event

e activation.

al, dependinglan based on

o respond touration.

scenarios inponse plans.strophic andernate route

an extendedire attention Protection,ire alternate

T spill

and requireong-durationdents of thislimited to:

-

-

-

-

6.2.3

Intermalternwhichsettinlimite

-

-

-

-

-

6.2.4

Minoroccurthe incoord

-

-

-

Chain-rea

Severe inj

Environme

Weather-r

3. 75B75B75B75B30BInterme

mediate incidnate route ah sets a goang up a propeed to:

Major road

Overturne

Non-rollov

Rollover a

Commerci

4. 76B76B76B76B31BMinor In

r incidents irring incidentncident scendination betw

Minor pro

Disabled v

Roadway

ction crashe

jury and/or fa

ent-related c

related closu

ediate Incid

dents have activation. Thl of clearing

er traffic inci

dway debris

ed vehicles

ver multiple v

and/or multi-

ial carrier cra

ncident

nvolve event type. Typice and assist

ween respond

perty damag

vehicle

debris

s

atal crashes

crashes such

res such as f

ent

an expected he upper timg all incidentdent manage

vehicle crash

vehicle crash

ashes

nts with duraally, only Rovictims in c

ding agencies

ge

as a fuel spi

fog or major

duration beme limit confo

s within 90 ement area.

hes

hes

ation less thad Rangers olearing the is. Minor incid

ll

storm

tween 30 anorms to the minutes. Int

Intermediate

han 30 minuor a law enfoncident scen

dents may be

nd 90 minutState of Flo

termediate ie incidents m

utes. They aorcement offine. These ince caused by, b

Concept oDynamic D

es that mayorida’s open ncidents usu

may be caused

are the mosicer on patrocidents requibut not limite


18

y not requireroad policy,

ually required by, but not

t commonlyol respond toire minimumed to:

7.

Thsysreg

PTrCoLaFiEmStTrAPElCM

*

6B6B6B6BStakehol

is section oustem developgion and thei

Tab

lanning orgaransportatioounty and Ciaw enforcemire departmemergency metate emergenransit agencyuthority) rivate towinglected officiaitizens Advis

Media * Source: Modifie

7.1. 36B36B36B36BPla

The North different sjurisdictionrelationshiproute criteorganizatioassure all inthe focus oregion.

The planninwhich may provides thmay be useprovided in

7.2. 37B37B37B37BTra

The FDOT (TMC) operqualified pinformationincidents atraffic camRoad RangRangers casuch as, trconstantly the originadecision an

The FDOT implementienforcemenpublic work

lders’ Role

utlines the ropment. The fir involvemen

le 3. Stakeho

Stakeh

nization (Norn/public worty)

ment (FHP, JSent edical servicncy operatioy (Jacksonvi

g companies als sory Committ

ed from Alterna

anning Orga

Florida TPOtakeholders.

n) and help ps with the eria or may on should panvolved agenof detour rou

ng agency mnot be avai

he informatioeful in determ Appendix B.

ansportation

District 2 Trrating 24 ho

personnel, wn using dynnd delay. Hoeras, radar d

ger program,an assist resaffic cones, monitor con

al route and nd provide tim

Maintenanceing alternatent officers inks departmen

es and Re

oles and respfollowing tabnt in each ph

older Involve

holder

rth Florida TPks agency (F

SO, etc.)

e ns center lle Transport

tee

te Route Handb

nization - N

O may act a. They can

establish tlocal agencidefer it to

rticipate in tncies sign offute planning

may also provilable with o

on about majmining the fea.

n/Public Wo

raffic Engineours a day, s

who help in amic messa

owever, not adetectors, etc, which is a ponders in immessage bogestion on thdetour rout

mely informa

e Office ande signal plan setting up nt supply nec

sponsibilit

ponsibilities le provides tase of the dy

ment in Each

PO) FDOT,

tation

book

orth Florida

as a lead staapply the khe inter-juries. They cantransportati

the stakeholdf on the selecshould be to

vide access tther agencieor roadway iasibility of an

orks Agency

ering and Opseven days managing t

age signs anall roadways c. to monitor

free motormplementingoards, etc. Thhe freeway ae. They shoution to moto

d county andns, propertylane closure

cessary traff

ties

of the regionthe list of staynamic detou

h Phase of Dy

Detour Route

SelectionYes

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Yes No Yes Yes No

a TPO

akeholder tonowledge abisdictional an facilitate sion or publicder meetingscted plan of o relieve traf

to resourceses to use in in the regionn alternate r

y

perations Offa week. Thetraffic incidend using trawithin the n

r traffic congist assistanc

g detours andhe goal of thnd local roaduld help imprists.

d local publicy damage rees and manaic control de

nal stakeholdakeholders aur system for

ynamic Deto

DetourRoute Pl

DevelopmYes

YesYesYesYesNo

No No No No No

o establish mbout the regagreement estakeholder c works ages, sign off oaction. The Nffic congesti

s, such as thedeveloping and informa

route. A samp

fice consistse TMCs are oents as welaffic cameraortheast Flo

gestion and ince program d diversions he transportds, and to complement the

c works depepairs, as wging detours

evices such a

ders involvedas it applies tr alternate ro

ur System R

r lan

ment

TraManag

PlanN

YYNNN

YNNNN

mutual agencgion as a wefficiently lemeetings to

encies. In ein the selecteNorth Floridaon, travel tim

e GIS databadetour route

ation on priople memoran

s of two trafoperated by ll as dissemas to monitorida region hncidents. Thion FDOT opusing variouation and pumpare traveldetour route

partments plwell as provs. The FDOT as traffic con

Concept oDynamic D

d during dynto the North oute planning

oute Plannin

affic gement nning

Imp

No

Yes Yes No No No

Yes No No No No

cy agreemenwhole (not jueveraging tho establish thther case, ted alternatea TPO shouldme, and dela

ase and demes. The planr performed

ndum of unde

fic managema group of

minating timor roadway have ITS devs office also perated roadus traffic conublic works al time and dee based on

ay an imporiding manpoMaintenancees, message


19

namic detourFlorida TPO

g.

ng

plementation

No

Yes Yes Yes No Yes

Yes Yes No No Yes

nts betweenust a singleheir ongoinghe alternatethe planning routes, and

d ensure thatay within the

mand models,ning agencystudies that

erstanding is

ment centerstrained andely travelercongestion,

vices such asincludes the

dways. Roadntrol devicesagency is toelay betweenan informed

rtant role inower to lawe Office and boards, and

n

warning sigregional tra

- FDO

- City

- City

- Cla

- Cla

- Nas

- St.

- St.

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- Tow

- Tow

Following adetour syst

Serdive

Setinvimairescom

Asssub

Shaand

Contravinfo

ShaTheava

Monfielimp

Estorig

Detmaymet

Genthe

gns during transportation

OT District 2

y of Jackson

y of Jackson

y County Pub

y County Pub

ssau County

Johns Count

Johns Count

y of Jackson

y of Atlantic

y of Fernand

y of Green Co

y of Neptune

y of St. Augu

wn of Baldwin

wn of Orange

are the rolestem from inc

rve as a leaderted. Also, a

t up or particite local autintenance oftrictions eac

mmitment in

sure that albsequent deto

are plans andd technical da

nstantly monvel time andormation sho

are and/or exe ITS data coailable.

nitor traffic cd personnel

plementation

ablish strateginal route.

termine timey be used as t.

nerate and m traffic incid

raffic detoursand public w

ville Departm

ville Traffic E

blic Works De

blic Works Tr

Public Works

ty Public Wor

ty Traffic and

ville Beach P

Beach Public

ina Beach Pu

ove Springs P

e Beach Publi

ustine Public

n Public Work

e Park Public

and responseption to imp

d agency as apply the kno

cipate in thethorities andf the roadwach agency mdeveloping a

l transportaour route pla

d maps that aata that is re

nitor the cond delay inforould be dissem

xchange the ould be the t

conditions onto conduct

and docume

egic locations

e period restran alternate

maintain the dent manage

s and traveleworks agencie

ment of Publi

Engineering D

epartment

raffic Contro

s Departmen

rks Departme

d Transporta

Public Works

c Works Depa

ublic Works D

Public Works

ic Works Dep

Works Depar

ks Departme

Works Depa

sibilities of tplementation

they are in owledge of lo

e meetings wd transportay corridor way have abo

and implemen

ation agenciean.

are available quired to sup

gestion and rmation betwminated to th

ITS and trafftraffic camer

n alternate rt site visits ent details on

s for detour

rictions basee route and te

contact list ement and d

ers informates.

c Works

Division

l Division

t

ent

tion Departm

Department

artment

Department

s Department

partment

rtment

nt

rtment

the transportn:

charge of thocal roadway

where the deation agenciewhere traffic out adding trnting detour

es involved

for the benepport this eff

incident conween the orhe motorist t

fic data with ra feeds, DM

routes if survat frequent

n roadway an

signs for dri

ed on traffic erminate the

of all respondetour activ

ion dissemin

ment

t

tation and p

he roadway and traffic in

etour route ces that are is diverted.

raffic to theiroute plan.

signed off

efit of the grofort.

nditions on thriginal route to make an in

other agencMS informatio

veillance is at intervals

nd traffic patt

ivers’ inform

conditions ae detour rout

nsible stakehvity. Provide

nation. The fo

ublic works

system to an the area to

criteria are lresponsible

At this foruir systems a

on the sele

oup. Share de

he affected rand detour

nformed en-r

cies for an apon, traffic de

available. Othduring and terns along t

mation and to

and time of dte plan when

holders in th responder

Concept oDynamic D

ollowing list

agencies in t

and from whio develop det

aid out. In te for the opm, discuss ts well as req

ected detour

etour routes

roadways anr route. The route decisio

ppropriate pletector data,

herwise, sendafter the d

the detour ro

o bring them

day as to whthese condit

he region parcontact info


20

outlines the

the dynamic

ich traffic istour routes.

his meeting,peration andhe issues orquiring their

r route and

, if available,

nd determinetravel time

n.

an of action., etc., where

d and assigndetour routeoute.

back to the

hen the roadtions are not

rticipating inormation for

incl

ProRoa

Opestat

Assimp

Adjthatim

Det

Mitimp

7.3. 38B38B38B38BLaw

The followiThe fire anclassified u

- Flo

- FDO

- Flo

- Jac

- Jac

- Cla

- Cla

- Nas

- Nas

- St.

- St.

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- City

- Tow

- Tow

Following a

Acc

lusion in the

ovide TMC anad Ranger se

erate and mate and local a

sist the law eplementation

ust and modt operate aning plan to a

termine trave

igate trafficplementation

w Enforcem

ng list identind rescue anunder public s

rida Highway

OT Motor Car

rida Departm

cksonville Sh

cksonville Fir

y County She

y County Pub

ssau County

ssau County

Johns Count

Johns Count

y of Jackson

y of Jackson

y of Atlantic

y of Fernand

y of Fernand

y of Green Co

y of Neptune

y of Neptune

y of St. Augu

y of St. Augu

y of St. Augu

wn of Orange

wn of Orange

are the roles

cess and inte

detour route

nd Road Ranervice covera

aintain the dyagencies.

enforcement protocol.

dify traffic signd maintain tccommodate

eler informat

c conditions.

ent and Pub

ifies the locand emergencsafety agenc

y Patrol

rrier Complia

ment of Highw

eriff’s Office

re and Rescue

eriff’s Office

blic Safety D

Sheriff’s Offi

Fire and Res

ty Sheriff’s O

ty Fire and R

ville Beach P

ville Beach F

Beach Police

ina Beach Po

ina Beach Fir

ove Springs P

e Beach Depa

e Beach Polic

ustine Depart

ustine Police

ustine Beach

e Park Depart

e Park Police

and responsi

egrate the dy

e plan.

nger supportage is availab

ynamic detou

agency in m

gnal timing bthe traffic sie additional t

tion dissemin

s in the a

blic Safety A

al law enforcecy medical sies in the nor

ance Office

way Safety a

e Departmen

epartment

ice

scue Adminis

Office

escue Depar

Police Depart

Fire Departm

e Departmen

olice Departm

re and Rescu

Police Depar

artment of Pu

e Departmen

tment of Pub

Department

Police Depar

tment of Pub

Department

ibilities of th

ynamic detou

t for the sysble.

ur system in

making an info

based on trafgnals in the raffic on loca

nation modes

area using

Agencies

ement and pservice (EMSrtheast Flori

nd Motor Ve

nt

tration

rtment

tment

ent

t

ment

ue Departmen

tment

ublic Safety

nt

lic Safety

rtment

blic Safety

e law enforce

ur system int

stem operati

the region.

ormed decisi

ffic demand. region is de

al roads.

s and messag

all available

ublic safety S) departmenda region.

hicles

nt

ement and p

o their decis

ion and main

The respons

ion to implem

Coordinationesired to dev

ges, and issue

e resources

agencies in nnts are cons

ublic safety d

sion support

Concept oDynamic D

ntenance wh

sibility is sha

ment the det

n between lovelop an alte

e press relea

s during de

northeast Flosidered as o

departments

system to no


21

here ITS and

red between

tour plan per

cal agenciesernate signal

ases.

etour route

orida region.one unit and

s:

otify federal,

stat

Par

Havpub

Estfollcoinred

Procon

Pardet

Firedyndev

Detmot

SetForvehthe

Shawhi

Evaalte

Cooand

Repmai

7.4. 39B39B39B39BSta

The followiState and dynamic deare carried

- Flo

- City

- Cla

- Nas

- St.

County emhurricanes force. The are not limi

Parsele

Mayimp

Accstat

te and local a

rticipate in st

ve the authoblic works ag

ablish contaow the implencide with thuce travel tim

ovide supportntrol and/or m

rticipates in our route sy

e and rescuenamic detourvelopment.

termine safetorists and p

t criteria on dr example, hhicles from thir response t

are locationsich will help a

aluate the saernate route

ordinate withd natural disa

port issues wintenance de

ate and Loca

ng list identilocal emerg

etour systemout by vario

rida Departm

y of Jackson

y County Em

ssau County

Johns Count

mergency maand other mroles and reited to:

rticipate in thected detour

y have theplementation

cess and intete and local a

agencies.

takeholder m

rity to impleencies.

ct with the lementation phe transportame and delay

t to the detomonitoring ro

all four stepstem.

e departmentr system. Wh

ty criteria repedestrians a

detour route heavy trafficheir stations time.

s of their staavoid the sele

fety of the dchoice, if saf

h transportatasters.

with the equipepartments.

al Emergenc

ifies the statency manag

m during emeous local, stat

ment of Emer

ville Emerge

mergency Man

Emergency M

ty Emergency

anagement major eventssponsibilities

he meetings r routes and s

e authority protocols se

egrate the dyagencies.

meetings to d

ment detour

ocal transpoprotocol baseation and puys on roads in

ur operationole in the fiel

ps of dynam

ts may not phile EMS onl

elated to tralong the deto

choice basedc on the alte

or dispatch f

ations and diection of alte

detour route fety becomes

tion agencies

pment in the

cy Operatio

te and local egement depaergency and te, and feder

gency Manag

ncy Managem

nagement

Management

y Manageme

departmentss such as tos of FDOT an

where stakesubsequent a

to implemeet by the stak

ynamic detou

iscuss and si

routes when

ortation agened on informeblic works agnvolved.

with numerod.

ic detour sy

articipate in y participate

affic operatioour route.

d on the exteernate routefacility adjac

ispatch faciliernate routes

as a part of s an issue.

s to deploy t

e field to the

on Center

emergency ortments playcatastrophical respondin

gement

ment

ent

s or emergeornadoes andnd county em

holders selecalternate rou

ent alternatkeholders.

ur system int

ign off on the

n needed, in

ncies to actived decisions.gencies, deto

ous traffic co

ystem route

the traffic mes and provi

ons/enforcem

ent to which e may impedcent to the ro

ities and rous that negati

an after acti

the dynamic

maintaining

operation ceny a vital rolc events. Theg agencies, s

ency operatd major thunmergency ma

ct preferred ute plans.

te routes b

o their decis

eir roles and

coordination

vate the dyn. The implemour plans to

ontrol officer

planning and

managementdes their inp

ment person

their responde ingress a

oadway, whic

utes they typively impact

ion review an

detour syste

agencies su

nters in the nle in operatie emergencysuch as:

tions centernderstorms wanagement d

alternate rou

based on in

sion support

Concept oDynamic D

responsibilit

n with transp

amic detour entation promitigate con

rs serving eit

d implement

t planning prput in detou

nel safety a

se time may and egress ch may negat

pically use fotheir respons

nd recomme

em during sp

ch as the sta

northeast Floing and maiy manageme

rs are activwith hurricadepartments

utes and sign

nformed de

system to no


22

ties.

ortation and

system andotocol shouldngestion and

ther a traffic

tation of the

ocess of ther route plan

nd safety of

be affected.of response

tively impact

or response,se time.

nds team on

pecial events

ate and local

orida region.ntaining the

ent functions

ated duringne like windinclude, but

ns off on the

cisions and

otify federal,

Repmai

Pla

7.5. 40B40B40B40BTra

The local trfollowing ar

Parsele

Proact

Evaope

Devadju

Dissinfo

Pardet

Prosuit

7.6. 41B41B41B41BPri

Private towparticipate remove thein the after

7.7. 42B42B42B42BEle

Elected offcriteria for the meetinand subseqimplementeknowledge

7.8. 43B43B43B43BLoc

The local msystem tracenters or activities.

port issues wintenance de

y an importa

ansit Agency

ransit agencre the roles a

rticipate in tected detour

ovide transit ivity.

aluate transiterating on the

velop an expust schedule

seminate information on e

rticipate in thour routes. F

ovide informatable or not s

vate Towing

wing companin the dyna

e wrecked ver action revie

ected Officia

ficials, and thdetour routegs where sta

quent alternaed, would con the detou

cal Media

media plays affic manage

emergency

with the equipepartments.

ant role in dis

y

y in the nortand responsi

he meetingsr routes and s

schedules t

t performance detour rout

panded sched operations

ormation on expanded sch

he discussionFor example,

ation on bus suitable for t

g Companie

nies have noamic detour ehicles from tew to provide

als and Com

he citizens’ ae selection aakeholders sate route plareate neglig

ur route that

an importament procesoperations c

pment in the

sseminating p

theast Floridbilities of the

s where staksubsequent a

to the transp

ce during dette.

edule to accs due to prim

transit operhedule.

n of traffic ctransit agen

routes and bransit routes

es

o role to playsystem opertravel lanes a

e feedback on

mmunity Gro

advisory comnd implemenelect preferr

ans. They shogible impact

may be usef

nt role in dss. Local mecenters, as a

e field to the

public inform

a region is Je transit age

eholders selalternate rou

portation ag

tour operatio

ommodate tary route clo

rators and pa

control measncy may spec

bus stations s.

y in planningration duringand eventuan system per

ups

mmittees andntation that mred detour roould help the

on commuful for the lea

isseminatingdia can alsopplicable, to

maintaining

mation to the

Jacksonville ncies:

ect preferreute plans.

gencies to in

on and determ

the additionaosure when th

assengers as

sures necessacify a minimu

in addition t

g and finalizg its implemelly off the ro

rformance an

d the technicminimizes cooutes and sige lead agencyunity lifestylad agency.

g public infoo establish c keep inform

agencies su

local media.

Transportat

ed detour rou

nclude in the

mine when tr

al traffic dehe detour ro

s well as prov

ary for efficium travel tim

o specific de

zing of detouentation and

oadway systend express th

cal coordinatommunity imgn off on they select the e. Citizens

rmation durontact with

med of the ha

Concept oDynamic D

ch as the sta

ion Authority

utes and sig

e detour rou

ransit vehicle

mand. Also, ute is implem

vide passeng

ient transit oe.

etour routes

ur route. Hod provide towem. They alsoheir concerns

tion committpact. They pe selected dedetour routemay provid

ing the dynthe traffic mappenings on


23

ate and local

y (JTA). The

n off on the

ute selection

es will cease

review andmented.

gers with the

operation on

that may be

owever, theyw service too participates, if any.

tee promoteparticipate inetour routese that, whene first-hand

amic detourmanagementn the detour

8.

Thmasupenv

7B7B7B7BOperatio

e operationaanagement applementing vironment in

8.1. 44B44B44B44BIns

The boundaCounties. IJacksonvillNassau CoTown of Orland area. Twhich cross

In addition District 2. FLake City, maintenancmaintenancAugustine. institutionaconcept wh

8.1.1.

The Fwest Comm

The comminformRoad stakeimple

8.1.2

The Froadwenforsignsthe Rroadw

1.

2

3

4

5

CurreMondsegmservic

onal and S

al and suppond operationthe existing

n detail.

titutional E

ary of North Included in le Beach andunty; St. Aurange Park inThese differes jurisdiction

to these locFDOT Distric

Palatka, Pce of Intersce facilities wIn addition t

al environmehen needed.

77B77B77B77BTraffic

FDOT Districof downtown

munications C

TMCs perfomunications amation conce

Ranger heeholder contaement detour

. 78B78B78B78BRoad R

FDOT Road Rways in the rcement agen along with o

Road Rangerways as show

I-95: fromCollege St

. I-295: from

. I-10: from

4. J. T. Butle

. SR 9A: fro

ently, the hoday through

ments, they cces through a

upport En

rt environmens concepts og resources.

nvironment

Florida TPOthese bound

d the Town ofgustine and n Clay Countent entities oal boundarie

cal jurisdictioct 2 serves 18Perry, St. Astates and swithin the Noto the mainteent will prov

Managemen

ct 2 Traffic an. The other Center (JRCC

orm routine and scores oferning roadwelp upon reqact list in car plans on the

anger Prog

Ranger progrnortheast F

ncies throughother servicer program iswn below:

m San Marcotreet

m I-95 south

San Marco B

er Boulevard

om Pulaski R

ours of operaFriday. Althocan service a toll-free ce

nvironmen

ent providesor technology. The followi

includes all daries are tf Baldwin in St. Augustin

ty. The totalperate and m

es.

ons, the Nort8 counties anugustine, anstate roadwaorth Florida Tenance operide manpow

nt Center

and ITS Operis located at

C).

regional suf video came

way closures vquest or fo

ase a detour eir respective

ram

am is a free lorida regionh a traffic maes during dyns along 127

o Boulevard

h to Pulaski R

Boulevard (Fu

or SR 202: f

oad to I-95 s

ation of the ough, the rothe arterial

ellular numbe

nt

s informationy by utilizinging sections

of Duval Couhe cities ofDuval Countne Beach in

North Floridmaintain seve

th Florida TPnd seven majnd Starke. Tays within tTPO service aations, thereer, material

rations Offict the Florida

urveillance oeras deployedvia 511 and dyr routine sis implemen

e roadway sy

service to mn. The Road anagement cnamic detourone way cen

to Pecan P

Road

uller Warren

from I-95 to S

southbound

Road Rangeoutes covere

system upoer, *FHP (*34

n on region’s existing resdescribe th

unty and porf Atlantic Bey; FernandinSt. Johns C

da TPO juriseral local roa

PO boundaryjor cities, whThe districttheir servicearea; one is le is a local F

and operat

ce is at the F Highway Pa

on major rod for this purynamic messurveillance nted and theystems.

motorists thaRanger serv

center to assr implementanterline mile

Park Road an

Bridge) to SR

SR A1A

er program aed by the Roon request. 47).

s capability oources with

he region’s s

rtions of Clayeach, Neptu

na Beach andCounty; and Gdiction cove

adway system

y makes up ahich include G is response area. Thelocated in EdDOT Jacksonional resour

FDOT Jacksoatrol Troop G

oadways outrpose. They asage signs. Tpurposes. T

e local jurisd

at is currentlyvice could b

sist in settingation. The rees, which ex

nd from Old

R 200 (US 3

are betweenoad Ranger pMotorists ca

Concept oDynamic D

of embracingminimal enhasupport and

y, Nassau, anne Beach, J

d the Town oGreen Cove rs 1,838 squ

ms in the reg

a major portGainesville, Jsible for opre are two

dison and thenville Bridgeces to supp

onville UrbanG’s Jacksonv

tfitted with also dissemin

They assist inThe TMC maictions are c

y deployed obe requestedg up detours gional covertends to the

St. Augusti

01)

6:30 AM anprogram arean access R


24

g new trafficancement or

operational

nd St. JohnsJacksonville,f Callahan inSprings and

uare miles ofion, many of

tion of FDOTJacksonville,eration andlocal FDOT

e other in St.e Office. Thisort the new

n Office justille Regional

fiber opticnate travelern dispatchingaintains thecontacted to

on five majord by the lawand warningage area fore five major

ine north to

nd 6:30 PM,e all freewayRoad Ranger

8.2. 45B45B45B45BTec

8.2.1

The ealongwouldnortharter

Thereintercused

Dynaon rodedicmessused

Figurnorth

chnical Envi

. 79B79B79B79BExisting

existing ITS ng I-95, I-10 ad install CCTheast Floridaials within th

e are 77 trachange; I-29for surveillan

mic messageadway closu

cating additioage signs arwhere appro

e 5 shows theast Florida

ironment

g ITS Netwo

network is cond I-295. Th

TV and DMS developed a

he North Flor

affic camera5 southwestnce, detectio

e signs, wherres. The dynaonal personne not availab

opriate.

the locationsregion.

ork

omprised of the coverage

along the ean ITS masteida TPO serv

s installed tt quadrant; aon, and verific

re available, amic messagnel at or neble, portable

s of all exist

traffic cameron I-295 is

entire loop oer plan updavice area.

to cover: I-9and I-10 betwcation of traf

are an efficige signs can sear the scen

changeable

ting traffic c

ras, traffic departial and

of I-295/SR ate to cover

95 between ween I-95 anffic incidents

ent outlet fosubstitute fo

ne for travelmessage sig

cameras and

etectors andis part of a9A. In additthe majority

Pecan Parknd Chaffee Rs.

or disseminator the need toer informati

gns or foldab

d dynamic m

Concept oDynamic D

d dynamic men ongoing pion, the ITS y of major fr

k Road and Road. These c

ting travelero install warnion. Where t

ble static sign

message sign


25

essage signsroject whichcoalition of

reeways and

I-295 southcameras are

informationning signs orthe dynamicns should be

s within the

*Source: F

Florida 511 webs

site

Figure 5. Ex

xisting ITS C

Coverage

Concept oDynamic D


26

9.

Seareop

8B8B8B8BSystem

veral considee discussed erate, and m

9.1. 46B46B46B46BDev

Two types region, as s

9.1.1.

The apanel

1. A“la

2. CE

3. R

4. D

The ashoullocatiselecflashi

Figur

Deployme

erations relain this sectaintain the d

vice Consid

of systems sshown in the

80B80B80B80BArteria

arterial dynaml components

Action messaDetour”, “Deanguage by t

ardinal messast and West

Route shield p

Directional ar

action messad conform toions and othted such thaing beacon tr

e 7 below sh

ent

ated to envirotion. This sedynamic deto

erations

should be cofollowing sec

l Dynamic T

mic trailblazes. The dynam

age light emielay”, “Closuhe operating

sage LED pat.

panel is a typ

row LED pan

age panel cao 2009 Manuher requiremat clear visirailblazer sig

Figure

ows the conc

onmental, tection is inte

our system.

nsidered forctions.

Trailblazer S

er sign consimic trailblaze

tting diode (ure”, “Conge agency.

anel that is u

pical static ro

nel which incl

an be used iual of Uniform

ments for flability is main assembly.

e 6. Arterial

ceptual layou

echnical, and ended to pro

dynamic det

Sign

sts of regulaer sign assem

(LED) panel estion”, etc.

used to show

oute shield pa

udes arrow s

n place of am Traffic Co

ashing beacontained for

l Dynamic T

ut for arteria

institutionalovide sugges

tour system

ar static trailbmbly typically

that is usedand their a

w the cardina

anel.

showing thru

additional flantrol Device

on signs. Thethe motoris

Trailblazer S

al trailblazer s

l aspects of tstions to th

deployment

blazer signs y consists of:

to convey aapproved ab

al informatio

u, left and rig

ashing lights(MUTCD) Ch

e location ots. Figure 6

Sign

sign placeme

Concept oDynamic D

the system de agencies

in the north

with ITS LED:

action messabreviations

on such as N

ht arrows.

. These signhapter 4L forf these sign

6 below show

ent in a corrid


27

deploymentsthat deploy,

heast Florida

D display sub

age, such asas standard

North, South,

n assembliesr installation

ns should bews a sample

dor.

N

Fig

gure 7. Arte

rial Dynami

c Trailblaze

er Sign Conc

cept Layout

Concept oDynamic D

t


28

The astreenotifioptiostaticcover

9.1.2.

Artercompinformthree

The abeforbe co

1.

2

3

4

5

6

7

If thedisplaand a

Figur

arterial trailbt level on paed ahead ofn provides fc trailblazer rage is neede

. 81B81B81B81BArteria

rial DMS mapared to the tmation dissee lines of text

arterial DMSre entering thonsidered for

TRAVELT

. FREEWAY

. < ROAD NA

4. FREEWAY

. USE 511 FO

. DETOUR A

. <ROAD NA

e message isayed in two all other DMS

e 9 below sh

blazer optionrallel and cro

f time beforeflexibility to option, this

ed to activate

l Dynamic M

ay substitutetrailblazer opmination. Thts. Figure 8 b

*Ar

S messages she cross stredisplay are s

IME/I-95 <XX

Y CONGESTIO

AME> CONGE

Y CONGESTIO

OR DRIVER I

ACTIVATED /

AME> CONGE

s long, thenphases. Use

S requiremen

ows the conc

n includes deoss streets ae entering thchoose betwflexibility noe flashing be

Message Sig

e for arteriaption, but prohe arterial DMbelow shows

Figure

terial DMS at

should be sheet intersectishown below

X> MIN, US 1 <

ON / USE <RO

ESTED / USE

ON / DETOUR

NFORMATIO

/ FOLLOW <R

ESTED / USE

the DMS sof 2009 MU

ts.

cept layout o

eployment ofat major intehe cross streween freewaot available. acons remot

gns

al trailblazeovides additioMS are smalla sample art

8. Arterial

Blanding Boul

hort and to ng and leadin

w:

<XX> MIN

OAD NAME> <

E <ROAD NAM

R ACTIVATED

ON

ROAD NAME>

DETOUR

hould be runUTCD Chapte

of the arteria

f static or dyrsection poineet leading

ay directionsIn either cas

tely.

r signs. Thional flexibilitler in size coterial DMS.

DMS

evard/SR 21

the point prng to freewa

<DIRECTION>

ME>

D

> <DIRECTION

n in flashinger 2L is reco

al DMS.

ynamic trailbnts, as shownto freeway.

s that are imse, the ITS c

is is a morety to the sysompared to f

roviding actiy. A few sam

>

N>

g mode and ommended fo

Concept oDynamic D

blazer signs n in Figure 7The dynami

mpacted whecommunicatio

e expensivetem operatoreeway DMS

ion messagemple message

the informaor DMS mess


29

at the cross. Drivers arec trailblazer

ereas, in theons network

e alternativer in terms of

S with two to

es to driverses that could

ation can besage display

N

Figu

ure 9. Arter

ial DMS Con

ncept Layou

ut

Concept oDynamic D


30

1 Ins

The choiceprovides th

T

Advantage 1. Easier to i2. Lower co3. Lower ma4. Simpler s5. Lower po

Advantage 1. Maximum 2. Maximum3. Can be us4. Longer lif5. Higher vis6. Can be de7. Can be us

9.2. 47B47B47B47BCor

Four majordeploymencoverage o

I-95 (

I-295

I-10 (

SR 2

SR 202 orstreets in controller ddeployed incoverage o

9.3. 48B48B48B48BCos

The followiBased on relatively lbenefit-costhe region. to the moconsideringtrailblazer the dynami

stallation of arte

e of device dhe list of adva

Table 4. List

install st option aintenance astructural supwer requirem

flexibility fom flexibility tosed for otherfe cycle sibility esigned to gosed for specia

rridor Consi

r corridors int. Table 5 bn mainline an

(St. Johns Cou

5/SR 9A (entir

US 301 to I-95

02/JTB (US 1

r J. Turner Bthe northea

deployment. n the regionn the major c

st Considera

ing table shothe informaower cost co

st analysis ofThe arterial

torists unlikg the needsand arterial ic detour sys

erial DMS is cur

depends on antages and

of Advantag

nd operatingpport ment

r message dio choose acti events and s

o over travel al event info

ideration

n the northebelow providend cross stre

Freeway

unty line to GA

re loop)

5)

to SR A1A)

Butler Highwst Florida reOnly a few c

n0F0F0F0F

1. In order cross street

ations

ows the apption provideompared to f the two optl dynamic tra

ke the DMS are differe

DMS systemtem.

rently underway

various factdisadvantage

es and Disad

Arter

g cost

A

isplay ion messagesafety messa

lane rmation disp

east Florida res the informeets.

Table 5.

A State line)

way does notegion have Iross streetsfor a dynamlevel is requi

roximate coed in the ta

the arterial tions as well ailblazer optioption. Hownt for the

ms could also

y on SR 21 and U

tors and thees of the two

dvantages of

rial Trailblaz

rterial DMS

age display

lay

region are bmation on n

. Corridor Inf

No. of Interchang

(On Ramp

35

30

12

11

t have any eTS coveragehave CCTV d

mic detour sired.

sts of systeble, arterial DMS optionas the amouion is limited

wever, prioriurban region

o be consider

US 17 in Clay Co

e needs of to concepts:

Arterial Trai

er Disadvanta1. Message 2. Less flex3. Lower lif4. Lower vi5. Increase

Disadvanta1. Higher de2. Higher p3. Requires4. Higher m

being consideumber of in

ormation

ges M

ps) ITS C

P

P

P

N

existing ITS e and the ITdeployed andsystem to be

m installatiodynamic tr

. A further aunt of messagd in its flexibty should bn compared red to save c

unty.

the study ar

ilblazer and D

age is restricted

xibility to chofe cycle isibility

ed number of

age eployment co

power requires overhead stmaintenance

ered for the terchanges

Mainline

Coverage

Partial

Partial

Partial

None

coverage. InTS coverage d none of thee fully funct

on and operarailblazers wanalysis wouge dissemina

bility of provie given to

to rural recost as well

Concept oDynamic D

rea. The foll

DMS Concep

d to detour onoose action m

f signs neede

ost ements tructure desand operatin

dynamic deon the corri

Cross Street

ITS Coverage

Partial

None

None

None

n addition, vais limited t

e cross streettional and ef

ations and mwith LED subuld be needeation flexibiliiding differenthe need of

egion. A mixas meeting t


31

lowing table

ts

nly message

ed

ign ng cost

tour systemdor and ITS

arious crosso ITS signalts have DMSffective, ITS

maintenance.b-panels areed to do thety needed innt messagesf the regionx of arterialthe needs of

A

S

A

S

*

*

Free

Arterial Dynam

I-95

I-295/SR 9A

I-10

SR 202/JTB

Arterial DMS*

I-95

I-295/SR 9A

I-10

SR 202/JTB

*Arterial trailbla

**DMS: Dynamic

9.4. 49B49B49B49BPow

The systemsystem compower backbattery bac

9.5. 50B50B50B50BDev

Communicacurrently a

Har

Wir

Rad

Mic

Sat

Communica

Theto c

TheTele

TheDat

Thebetsign

way

mic Trailblaze

**

azer cost is $50

c Message Signs

wer Supply

m power supmmunication kup option. Dckup should b

vice Commu

ation betweevailable:

rd wired com

reless commu

dio frequency

crowave com

tellite commu

ations other

e New Jerseycommunicate

e Oklahomaecommunica

e City of Palota Acquisition

e California ween wind sns and dynam

NoInterc

r*

3

3

1

O

3

3

1

O0,000 each with

s; assumed two

Considerati

ply should band operatio

Due to the hibe provided f

unication Co

en devices a

munication u

unication

y communica

munication

unication

than hard wi

y Turnpike ane with the ITS

a environmtion System

o Alto, Califon (SCADA) sy

Oregon Advsensors and smic message

Table 6

o. of changes

35

30

12

11

Option I Total

35

30

12

11

Option II Total an O&M cost of

DMS per interch

ions

be designed ion. This can bgh power reqfor emergenc

onsideration

nd respondin

using fiber op

ation

red commun

nd the City oS devices.

mental mon(OLETS) leas

rnia transmitystem via the

vanced Transtatic and dysign messag

6. System Co

Ca

$3,5

$3,0

$1,2

$1,10

$8,8

$8,0

$6,9

$2,7

$2,5

$20,2f $2,000 per un

hange at $115,00

in such a wabe obtained quirement ofcy.

ns

ng agencies

ptics, copper

ication are s

f Aurora, Co

nitoring syssed telecom

ts the water e City’s telep

nsportation Synamic messge.

ost Table

pital Cost

500,000.00

000,000.00

00,000.00

00,000.00

800,000.00

050,000.00

900,000.00

760,000.00

530,000.00

240,000.00 nit per year; assu

00 each with O&

ay that thereby seamlessf the LED an

can be done

r wires, or tel

uccessfully i

lorado use ce

stem utilizelines for the

level sensorphone and ra

System (COsage signs to

uming two trailb

&M cost of $5,7

e is no singlly designing

nd DMS conce

e through va

lephone line

implemented

ellular digita

es Oklahom system com

r data to the dio commun

OATS) utilizeo automatica

Concept oDynamic D

O&M Cos

(per year

$140,000.0

$120,000.0

$48,000.0

$44,000.0

$352,000.0

$402,500.0

$345,000.0

$138,000.0

$126,500.0

$1,012,000.blazers per inter

00 per unit per

e point of fathe entire syepts, at least

arious metho

network

d by the follow

l packet data

ma Law Emmunication.

Supervisoryication netwo

es radio comally activate


32

st

)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

.00 rchange.

year.

ailure duringystem with at a two hour

ods that are

wing states:

a technology

Enforcement

Control andorks.

mmunicationthe flashing

9.6. 51B51B51B51BArt

Arterial sigimplementaonto the losignal timinmulti-jurisdthe local rotraffic on lo

In addition,signal coormake it thconsidered

- Min

- Mintraf

9.6.1.

Whensignatiminplace

1. TlibtrcethfaTmw

2. Csllocaminotrcec

3. Aasyploin

Any osignathe d

terial Signal

gnal timing ation to reduocal roadwayng plan in pldiction coordoadways. Thocal roadway

, signal systedination occ

hrough these for the traff

nimum pedes

nimum left tuffic.

. 82B82B82B82BTraffic

n traffic is divl timing alog along deto

e. Different ty

raffic Respobrary of pre-ased on prevraffic demanentral monitohat more clacility to eacMC operator

malfunctions, weather emer

losed-loop Slave configuroop system. apabilities, a

make adjustmn the closed perate prederaffic conditurrent timinvents (e.g., losures, polic

Adaptive Tradvanced andystem and alans and ma

ow thresholdn real time w

of these threl systems, adifferent adap

l Timing Mo

modificationuce delay andys, traffic is ace to help m

dination as thhe regular ti

ys due to deto

em coordinaturs when a g

e signals witfic signal timi

trian clearan

urn green ti

Signal Syst

verted to deng arterial cur routes is d

ypes of traffi

onsive System-established valent trafficd using vehioring capabilosely matchch intersectirs may overri

or during rgencies, roa

Systems: Closration. The mThe master llowing the o

ments as needloop may be

etermined timions. Howevg plans basetraffic incidece actions, et

ffic Signal Cd complex ty responsive ke timing ads for splits, oithin those th

ee traffic sigdaptive traffptive control

dification C

n is an impod improve traadded to itsmove traffic here might bime-of-day sour activities

tion is needegroup of two th a minimuing modificat

nce times bas

me should b

em and Cap

tour routes, corridors to dependent onc signal syst

m: Traffic-retiming plans

c conditions. cle detectionlities and aut

h prevalent on controlleide current tevents (e.gd closures, p

sed loop sysmaster contr

controller uoperating ageded. Commune provided byming plans wer, like traffed on trafficents, specialtc.).

Control Systypes of systcontrol syst

djustments baoffsets and chresholds.

gnal system fic signal consystems cur

onsideratio

ortant step avel time on capacity ansmoothly th

be more thanignal timing s.

ed to operator more trafm number otion are:

sed on the ro

be allotted,

pabilities

it is advantaaccommoda

n the capabilems are avai

sponsive cons. The plan sTraffic condn. The primatomatic downtraffic condr is a commiming plans b., traffic inc

police actions

stems includeoller dictates

usually includency to downnications bety wire line orwhich are sefic responsivc conditions,l events, roa

em: Traffic tems. The ptem is that aased upon gcycle lengths

types will wntrol offers thrrently in ope

ons

towards a the arterial

nd it is impohrough the an one jurisdic

plan may n

e traffic withffic signals aof stops pos

oadway chara

possibly in e

ageous to haate detouredlities of the tilable for this

ntrol systemelected by aitions are dery benefits onloading of sitions. Comm

mon charactebased on tracidents, spes, etc.).

e a group of s the timing des communnload timingtween the mar wireless mlected basedve systems, , hardware oadway const

adaptive traprimary diffeadaptive conathering rea

s are establis

work in a dynhe most flex

eration.

successful dnetwork. Whrtant to hav

arterial corridction that coot be suffici

h minimum dare working tssible. A few

acteristics.

each cycle, t

ave the capad traffic. Thetraffic signal s purpose inc

ms select a sa traffic respetermined baof traffic ressignal timing munications

eristic of trafffic condition

ecial events,

interconnecof other tra

nications (wir plans, monitaster controledia. Genera

d upon eitheoperations

or software truction, wea

affic controlerence betwetrol systems

al-time trafficshed, and the

namic detouxibility. The fo

Concept oDynamic D

dynamic dethen the traffive a policy adors. This montrols the sent to hand

delays and stogether so tw things tha

to clear hea

bility of adjue coordinatiocontrol syst

cluding:

ignal timing onsive systesed upon fieponsive systplans to profrom a cen

ffic responsins, hardware roadway c

cted signals ffic signals ired, wirelesstor the signaller and otheally, closed lor time of dapersonnel mmalfunction

ather emerge

systems areen an adaps do not havc data. Instee traffic sign

r environmeollowing sect


33

tour systemc is divertednd a backupay require a

signals alongle additional

tops. Trafficthat the carsat should be

avy left turn

usting trafficon of signalem that is in

plan from aem is usuallyld measuredtems includeovide timingsntral controlive systems.

e or softwareconstruction,

in a master-n the closed

s, or dial-up)al timing andr controllersoop systemsy or varying

may overrides, or duringencies, road

re the mostptive controle set timingad, high and

nal will adapt

nt. Of thesetion outlines

9.6.2

The rinfrasthe gproviexam

9.7. 52B52B52B52BSys

Once the interfaces then the insoftware isdynamic desoftware tothan the ex

In addition existing SuThis would TMCs to opsystem andis required.

2. 83B83B83B83BAdaptiv

real-time adastructure to sgreen time, de real-time

mples of adap

Sydney Co

Split Cycle

Real-Time

Real-Time

Optimizat

Urban Tra

Adaptive T

Method fo

Streetwise

QuicTrac

InSync® S

stem Interfa

ITS systemsbetween the

nformation ts used to intetour systemo integrate wxisting interfa

to the dynamunGuide® sys

require an perate local d the traffic s.

ve Traffic Si

aptive trafficsupport the rwherever po

e signal systtive signal co

oordinated A

e Offset Opti

e Traffic-Ada

e Hierarchica

ion Policies f

affic Optimiza

Traffic Contr

or the Optimi

e

System

ace Conside

s in the regese systems hat will be etegrate the e

m is new to thwithin the exace for the m

mic detour sstem should interagency traffic signa

signal contro

ignal Contro

c signal contremote controssible, traffem coordinaontrol system

Adaptive Traf

imization Tec

ptive Contro

al Optimized D

for Adaptive

ation by Integ

rol System (A

zation for Tr

erations

ion are idenare defined.

exchanged oexisting and he region andxisting architmainline DMS

ystem interfalso be expagreement

als after houol system, co

ol System

trol is an emrol of the trafic adaptive ation based ms:

ffic System (S

chnique (SCO

ol Software (R

Distributed a

Control (OPA

grated Autom

ATCS)

raffic Signals

ntified and f. Once the cn each of thproposed in

d would requecture. Howe.

ace considerplored for theto establish

urs. In the ammunication

merging techaffic signal sy

signal cooron real-time

SCATS)

OOT)

RT-TRACS)

and Effective

AC)

mation (SPOT

in On-line Co

functionalityconnections he interfacesnterfaces intoire a new intever, the int

rations, traffe implementoperational

bsence of anns between T

nology that ystem. Otherrdination shoe demand. T

e System (RH

T/UTOPIA)

ontrolled Net

y defined, thbetween thes is defined. o the region

terface and uterface shou

fic signal systation of det

responsibilitn interface bTMC operato

Concept oDynamic D

requires comr than manuaould be implhe following

HODES)

tworks (MOT

he existing ae systems ar

The FDOT’snal ITS architupdate to theld not be mu

tem integrattour and respties or to albetween thers and local a


34

mmunicationally adjustinglemented to

g is a list of

TION)

and plannedre identified,s SunGuide®tecture. Thee SunGuide®uch different

tion with theponse plans.low regional

e SunGuide®agency staff

10

Thim

0. 9B9B9B9BOperatio

e following tplementation

10.1. 53B53B53B53BSin

Scenario: Amorning pethe traffic traffic is aconnected

Action Plan

The followi

1. When ccamera

2. The TMalternaroute wroad, th

3. The TMinforma

4. The TMdecisioinciden

5. The TMmedicathe staprovide

6. Law ensupport

7. The dyinterch

8. The detthe freestablisactivity

9. When tnormal

10. Finally,discussbe cond

The followithe concep

onal Scena

three operatn.

ngle Segmen

A truck rolleeak hour. Resmanagemenllowed to reto a parallel

n:

ng list outlin

congestion sas and detect

MC determinte route cho

with that of then the detou

MC activates ation. It also

MC, in associan points to pt segment.

MC coordinatel service to irt and end ex

e to these ag

forcement at additional t

ynamic detouanges to dire

tour activity eeway and tshed threshoy for the segm

he detour syoperational

the involvesed during reducted. This

ng Figure 10 t layout.

arios

tional scenar

nt Impact

d over on a sponders arr

nt process. Tlease. This croad with se

es the action

starts to buitor system in

nes the segmice at the uphe detouredur activities s

the freewaycoordinates

ation with theprovide moto

es with law enform about xit numbers oencies.

nd the TMC traffic in thei

ur system siect traffic aro

is coordinattravel time old values, ament.

ystem is de-acondition.

ed agencies gular after aeffort should

shows the c

rios describe

six-lane frerived at the iTraffic is stacrash occurreveral signals

n plan for the

ld and traffinformation fo

ment of imppstream inter route. If theshould be ini

dynamic mewith the loca

e local jurisdrists guidanc

nforcement athe detour a

of the freewa

also coordinr system. Sig

igns at key ound the net

ted with the difference

all involved

activated, the

should be coaction reviewd be led by lo

oncept layou

e the concep

eway blockinincident scenrting to builed on a free

s. The paralle

e single segm

ic starts moor verification

pact and corchange. Thee difference itiated.

essage sign ual 511 office a

ictions, activce on returni

agencies, locactivation in ay impact up

nate with thegnal system c

decision poitwork to get b

mainline trafbetween oriagencies sh

e traffic sign

oordinated fw or, if the iss

cal transport

ut of the sing

pt of operati

ng two northne and securd up and on

eway segmenel road is a fo

ment impact i

oving slowly, n.

nsiders dissey should comin travel tim

upstream of and media to

vates the dyning back to t

cal transit agtheir region

pstream and

e local jurisdicoordination

ints should back on their

ffic activity. iginal route

hould be coo

nal timing and

for an after sue is major, tation agenc

gle segment i

ions for the

hbound lanesred the incidnly one lane nt between tour lane road

ncident scen

the TMC sh

seminating mmpare the tre on freeway

the incidentdisseminate

namic detourheir original

gency, fire anof impact. Thdownstream

ictions to acn should be ac

be activatedr original pat

Once the coand detour

ordinated to

d coordinatio

action reviethen an inci

cies.

impact and t

Concept oDynamic D

dynamic de

s on the fredent scene an

is open fromtwo interchaway.

nario:

hould pull up

motorist inforavel time ony is greater t

t to dissemine traveler info

r system signpath downst

nd rescue andhe TMC shou of the probl

tivate respoctivated.

d only betweth.

ongestion is cr route falls

de-escalate

on should be

ew. The issudent review

he key decis


35

tour system

eway duringnd activatedm which thenges that is

p the traffic

ormation forn the originalthan arterial

nate travelerormation.

ns at the keytream of the

d emergencyuld designateem area and

nse plans to

een the two

cleared froms below thee the detour

e returned to

ues could bemeeting can

ion points of

Figure 10.

Single Segm

ment Impac

ct - Concept

t Layout

Concept oDynamic D


36

10.2. 54B54B54B54BMu

Scenario: Apeak hour. and secureand there issegment wa parallel ro

Action Plan

The followi

1. When ccamerainterch


3. The TMtraveleinforma

4. The TMdecisioinciden

5. The TMemergedesignaproblem

6. Law ensupportincidencoordin

7. The keythe net

8. The detthe freeall invo

9. When tnormal


The followiof the conc

ltiple-Segm

A multiple caThis crash bd the incidens only one laith two intercoad with mul

n:

ng list outlin

congestion sas and detectanges, depen



MC activates r informatioation.

MC, in associan points to pt segment.

MC coordinaency medicaate the startm area and p

nforcement at additional tt impact on

nation plan sh

y decision powork. Traffic

tour activity eway and tralved agencie

he detour syoperational


ng Figure 11 cept layout.

ment Impact

r crash occubacked up trant scene, andne open fromchanges imptiple signals.

es the action

starts to buitor system innding on the


the freewayn. It also co

ation with theprovide moto

tes with lawl services at and end erovide to the

and the TMCtraffic in the

n the freewahould be acti

oints should c should not b

is coordinatavel time diffees should be c

ystem is de-acondition.


shows the co

urred on a sixaffic betweend activated tm which the tacted and bl. The parallel

n plan for the

ld and traffinformation foextent of co


y dynamic meoordinates w

e local jurisdrists guidanc

w enforcemebout the de

exit numbersese agencies.

C coordinateeir system. Tay to preparvated for the

be activatedbe directed t

ted with the erence betwecoordinated t

activated, the


oncept layou

x-lane freewan two interchhe traffic matraffic is alloocked due tol road is a fou

e multiple-seg

ic starts moor verificationgestion and


essage sign with the loca

ictions, activce on returni

ent agenciesetour activats of the free.

s with the lThe local jurire a proper e detour ope

d between tho the freewa

mainline trafeen original rto de-escalat

e traffic sign


cal transport

t of the mult

ay blocking thanges. Respanagement pwed to relea

o the incidenur lane roadw

gment impac

oving slowly, n. This detec

d slow down.


upstream ofal 511 office

vates the dyning back to t

s, local trantion in their eway impact

ocal jurisdicisdiction sho

response pration.

e interchangay in between

ffic activity. route and dete the detour

nal timing and


tiple-segmen

two northbouponders arrivprocess. Traffase. This crast. The interc

way.

ct incident sc

the TMC shction mainly


f the congestand media

namic detourheir original

nsit agenciesregion of im

t upstream

ctions to actould be madeplan. The sig

ges of impactn the segmen

Once the coetour route far activity for

d coordinatio


cies.

nt impact and

Concept oDynamic D

und lanes duved at the incfic is starting

sh occurred ohanges are c

cenario:

hould pull upranges betw


tion area to to dissemin

r system signpath downst

s, fire and mpact. Theand downstr

ivate respone aware of thgnal timing

t to direct trnt impacted.

ongestion is calls below 15-the segment

on should be


d the key dec


37

ring eveningcident sceneg to build upon a freewayconnected to

p the trafficween multiple


disseminateate traveler

ns at the keytream of the

rescue, andTMC shouldream of the

nse plans tohe extent ofand system

raffic around

cleared from-20 minutes,t.

e returned to


cision points

Figure 11. M

Multiple-Seg

gment Impac

ct - Concept

t Layout

Concept oDynamic D


38

10.3. 55B55B55B55BCor

Scenario: Mrequire lananticipated

Action Plan

The followi

1. When ccamerainterch


3. The TMtraveleinforma

4. The frescenaridiverte

5. The TMon theifreewaybe actcoordin

6. Law ensupportincidencoordin

7. The traalternashould

8. The TMlocal ju

9. The cojurisdic

10. Dynamtraffic a

11. Detour from thsegmen

12. The deconditio


The followiconcept lay

rridor Impac

Major construne closures d to have a m

n:

ng list outlin

congestion sas and detectanges, depen



MC activates r informatioation.

eeway trafficio, the conged to the loca

MC coordinater system. Thy to prepare ivated to su

nation is exte

nforcement at additional tt impact on

nation plan sh

ansit agencyte route. In aconsider re-r

MC should derisdictions to

ngestion impctions operat

ic signage ataround the n

activity shohe freeway alnt.

etour systemon.


ng Figure 12 yout.

ct

uction activitor traffic paajor impact o

es the action

starts to buitor system innding on the


the freewayn. It also co

c is divertedestion may col roadway ne

es with the lhe local jurisd

an appropriaupport the ensive and m

and the TMCtraffic on the

n the freewahould be acti

y and area saddition, the routing their

esignate the o quickly sco

pact on the ing and main

t key decisionetwork.

ould be coordll the agencie

m is de-activ


shows the c

ties are undeacing operaton traffic flow

n plan for the

ld and traffinformation foextent of co


y dynamic meoordinates w

d upstream over a longeretwork that a

ocal jurisdicdiction shoulate responsedetour activay require th

C coordinateeir system. Tay to preparvated for the

schools shoufire and rescresponse ve

exit numberpe out the ar

freeway shontaining the s

n points shou

dinated withes should be

vated and tr


oncept layou

erway on a stions by thew on the corr

e corridor imp

ic starts moor verificationgestion and


essage sign with the loca

at the tail or stretch of falso has local

tions to activd be made a

e plan. The sivity. In this he involveme

e with the loThe local jurre a proper e detour ope

ld consider cue, EMS andehicles to avo

rs of freewayrea of impact

ould be quicksignal system

uld be activa

the mainlincoordinated

affic signal


cal transport

ut of the corr

section of fre law enforcridor level.

pact incident

oving slowly, on. This deted slow down,


upstream ofal 511 office

of the congefreeway withl traffic acce

vate responsaware of the ignal timing

roadway cent of multipl

ocal jurisdictisdiction shoresponse p

ration.

reschedulingd law enforceoid delay and

y impact frot.

kly estimatedms and area r

ted between

ne incident a to de-escala

coordination


ridor impact

reeway that cement agen

t scenario:

the TMC shction mainlywhich is som


f the congestand media

estion to theh multiple intssing the fre

se plans to sextent of thand system losure the ne operating a

tions to actould be madeplan. The sig

g or reroutinement stationd congestion.

om start to f

d to identifyroadways.

n the intercha

ctivity. Onceate the detou

n is returned


cies.

and the key

Concept oDynamic D

will reduce cncy. The con

hould pull up ranges betw

metimes corri


tion area to to dissemin

e local roadterchanges. Teeway.

support addite incident imcoordinationneed for sigagencies.

ivate respone aware of tgnal timing

ng their busns in the impa.

inish and pr

y the impact

anges of imp

e the incidenur activity in

d to normal


decision junc


39

capacity andnstruction is

p the trafficween severalidor wide.


disseminateate traveler

way. In thisThe traffic is

tional trafficmpact on then plan shouldgnal system

nse plans tohe extent ofand system

ses along anacted region

ovide to the

on multiple

act to direct

nt is clearedthe corridor

operational


ctions of the

Figure

12. Corrido

or Impact - C

Concept Lay

yout

Concept oDynamic D


40

11.

Thproduthedeeqcoosys

10B10B10B10BStandard

e operationocedures to ring congeste northeast Fcision pointsuipment andordination, dstem.

11.1. 56B56B56B56BImp

The implemextensive mequipment includes dethe detouramong respbe orientedinformationinformed dbelow.

The corridoavailability 9A, I-10 andrequire humgenerally ravailable, b

11.2. 57B57B57B57BRes

The followi

1. Field Vvicinityshould Responthat are

2. TIM Proand shoincidencommu

3. Contacstakehorespond

4. Annual proposeThis asshould detour experie

11.3. 58B58B58B58BSys

In this condetour systtrailblazer with limitetraveler inavailable, b

d Operatin

al scenariosestablish a

tion and incidFlorida regios on maps. d resource decision supp

plementatio

mentation ofmulti-jurisdicresources b

efining the der segment foponders and d to the new n and traffic decisions for

or selection tin the regio

d SR 202. Thman intervenrequired. Thubut also on th

sponder Ori

ng bullets ou

Visits: Respony to gather fi

me made fnders should e specifically

ocesses: Resould be traint response fo

unications sho

t Lists: A coolders’ key ding agencie

Review: Resed changes asessment is be performeoperation d

ences.

stem and Re

cept of opertem. First issystem is a d flexibility formation d

but in either

ng Proced

s described coordinated

dents on arteon, a study a

This sectionusage, equi

port framewo

on Plan Over

f the dynamctional coordbetween statetour segmeor device orextensive ussystem in cadetour activdetour impl

to implementn. Four majo

he dynamic dntion in casesus, the level he interaction

ientation an

utline the nee

nders shouldirsthand infofrequently aprovide com

y geared towa

ponders shoed in the traor responderould be follow

ntact list shopersonnel ins.

sponders shoand modificarequired ford with the reuring the las

esource Dep

ration docum the arterialcombinationfor messag

disseminationcase, these

ures

in the earld and consiserials and frerea has beenn will definepment functork, and esc

rview

ic detour syination and e and local nt and assig

r equipment se of technoase needed tvities. A decilementation.

t detour operor highways wetour system

s where enginof control a

n required am

nd Coordina

ed for respon

d make themormation on tnd notes sh

mments and fards the map

uld be familiaffic incident r safety, safewed for the d

ould be prepnvolved in t

ould re-conveations that mr an efficientesponders fost year and

ployment

ment, there a trailblazer s

n of both ITSe changes.

n. However, devices sho

ier section stent approaeeways. In orn defined ande the implemtionality andalation and d

ystem on thinstitutional agencies. Thning detour placement.

logy during io provide adsion supportA brief disc

ration depenwere identifiem can be desineering judgmand automatimong agencie

tion

nder orientat

mselves familthe detour rehould be maeedback on t

p updates.

ar with theirmanagemen

e and quick cdetour opera

ared and mathe detour

ene for an anmay be requirt operation or a comprehelessons learn

are two typesystem and S and static The arterial the use of

uld be opera

require defach for an erder to impled equipment

mentation pld cost comde-escalation

e local roadsupport to s

he general croutes and iThis concep

implementatdditional suppt framework cussion on d

nds on agenced for detouigned to worment is requion will be des.

ion and coor

liar with theegion and unade for any the detour m

r roles and rent processes.clearance, antion.

aintained by operation. T

nnual reviewred due to fi

of the detourensive perfoned should b

es of systemsecond is thsign assemb DMS provid either syst

ated in coord

fining a set fficient traffement the dyt locations wan and provparison, resn procedures

dway systemsynergize thoncept of a identifying thpt requires ion. Howeveport as and wshould be de

decision sup

y priority, anr operation.

rk in an autonired. Coordin

dependent on

rdination:

detour routnderstand its

changes thmaps by parti

esponsibilitie. The Nationa

nd prompt, re

the traffic mThis list sho

of the detouield operatior route. In adrmance meabe noted to

ms identifiedhe arterial Dbly that provde consideratem dependdination with

Concept oDynamic D

of standarfic managemynamic detouere identifievide the infosponder ories of the dyn

m and freewae use of mandynamic de

he key decissystematic cr, the respon

when neededesigned to aport system

nd material aThey are I-9

nomous mannnation amongn the level o

te as well ass complexityhat may havicipating in t

s listed in thal Unified Goeliable, and in

management ould be shar

ur maps and onal or physiddition, an anasures assess

learn from t

for use in tMS system.

vides detour ably more fs on the IT

h the regiona


41

rd operatingment systemur system ind at the keyormation on

entation andnamic detour

ays requiresn power andtour systemion points incoordinationnders shouldd for travelerid in making is provided

and resource95, I-295/SRner, but mayg agencies isof manpower

s its generaly. Field visitsve occurred.he meetings

his documentoal (NUG) fornteroperable

center of allred with all

go over thecal changes.nnual reviewsment of thethe previous

the dynamicThe arterialinformation

lexibility forTS coverageal TMCs. The

system dep

The dynamresponsibleare responsother respotypical syst

Apart fromthe regionawhen the lsignals, if tand sharingsignal systeSunGuide®signal systproceduresoperationa

11.4. 59B59B59B59BDec

The decisiodynamic deagency destransportatto relieve cThe followigreater thashould be li

ployed at the

ic detour syse for TMC coosible for signonding agenctem and reso

F

m the interagal TMC and loocal agenciethe detour isg the responem interface

® software; thtem interfacs, including pl guidelines a

cision Supp

on support syetour systemsignated as tion as well acongestion ding flow chaan the arteriaifted.

key decision

stem requireordination annal coordinatcies for the dource coordin

Figure 13. Sy

ency coordinocal agencieses are closeds activated. Ansibility. Anoe into the FDOherefore, an ce should bhone calls anare in place.

ort System

ystem providm implementresponsible as public safeuring incidenrt shows tw

al road, then

n points shou

s cross-jurisnd providing tion when reqetour system

nation betwe

ystem and R

nation, a cens to operated. In such caAn interagenther vital asOT’s SunGuidalternate wa

be researchend faxes, betw

des foundatiotation. Althofor a particuety agenciesnts while proo critical dethe detour s

uld be activat

dictional cootraffic monitquested for dm deploymenen multiple j

Resource C

nter to centeand control

ases, the regncy agreemepect of this de® softwareay to establied until theween agencie

onal support ough, the ultular roadway is paramoun

oviding driveecision pointshould be act

ted for trave

ordination antoring informdetour opera

nt and operaturisdictions.

oordination

er (C2C) interthe traffic si

gional TMCs nt would beC2C commue. Currently, sh communice SunGuide®es can be em

information timate decisy system, thnt. The prima

ers a route cs, if the diffivated. When

ler informati

nd support, wmation to locaation. The TMtion. The follo

n Diagram

rface shouldignal systemmay operaterequired to

unication wou this capabilication with t® integratiomployed effec

for informedion falls upo

he input of tary objectivehoice to mak

ference in trn it drops low

Concept oDynamic D

ion on detour

where the staal agency. LoMC also coorowing figure

be establishs, especially e and controcarry out th

uld be the inity is not avathe local ageon is complctively for th

d decision mon the law ethe TMC ande of the detoke an inform

ravel time onwer, the deto


42

r route.

ate agency isocal agenciesrdinates with

outlines the

hed betweenafter hours,

ol the traffichis operationntegration ofailable in theency’s trafficete. Manualis purpose if

aking duringenforcementd other localur system is

med decision.n freeway isur operation

11.5. 60B60B60B60BEsc

1. Preparapublic directiv

2. Informacongesassess decisio

3. Stagingdetour transpoconditioenforce

calation Pro

ation: The TMsafety agencves, county p

ation: Approption periods.the impacts

n making and

g Law Enforcroute. In

ortation ageon returns tement officer

Figure 14

ocedure

MC and law ecies to solic

plans, and reg

priate channe. Traffic cams of congestd accurate in

cement Persthe absence

ency personnto normal. Wrs should be

4. Decision

enforcement it support in

gional plans s

els of commumera and detetion. All staknformation fo

sonnel: Law e of ITS conel should When freewaalerted to be

Support Sy

agencies shon activating should be ava

unication muector informkeholder age

or the motori

enforcementoverage alomonitor detay travel time prepared to

ystem Flow

ould coordinthe dynami

ailable to dec

ust be openedmation shouldencies shoulsts.

t personnel song the arttour operatime drops bo de-escalate

Chart

ate with the c detour sycision maker

d ahead of red be accessed work toge

should be aserial roads, on continuoelow arteria

e detour oper

Concept oDynamic D

local transpstem. This p

rs.

ecurring or noed at regular ether to pro

ssigned to mlaw enforc

ously until tal travel timration.


43

ortation andplan, agency

on-recurringintervals to

omote sound

monitor eachcement andthe freeway

mes, the law

4. Stagingcontracnecessaand traAgenciethe rou

5. Prepariinformagiving abe usedprivate

6. Detour congesTMC wsystem

7. Implemcoordin

11.6. 61B61B61B61BDe-

1. Openintraffic cases, making

2. Openinall part

11.7. 62B62B62B62BAft

Anytime ththe review review can at the FDOT

11.8. 63B63B63B63BPub

The FederaSeptemberTransportaintermittenManagemeoutreach sconditions. http://ops.f

The basic s

Det

Ide

Ide

Ide

Dev

Det

Det

Eva

More inform

g Maintenanctors shouldary to impleaffic cones ses may also te.

ing Detour Sation on the an alternate d to guide m contractors

Decision: Ttion. The law

will initiate tms, such as tr

mentation Dination with th

-escalation

g Decisions: conditions, ethe TMC wil process.

g Directive: Ticipating ent

ter Action R

he detour is ais to refine tbe held in co

T office in Ja

blic Informa

al Highway A 9, 2004 in ttion Manage

nt or continuont Plan (TMPtrategies to The FHWA p

fhwa.dot.gov

steps outlined

termine the A

ntify Resourc

ntify Partner

ntify Your Ta

velop the Cam

termine Com

termine When

aluate Effecti

mation on pu

nce of Traffbe availabl

ment the deshould be deneed to man

Systems: Thfreeway DM

route choicemotorists and, when neede

he decision w enforcemenhe detour oaffic camera

rective: Thehe TMC will g

Procedure

The decisionessentially wl confirm if

The law enfoities to open

Review

activated, thhe process a

onjunction wiacksonville, F

ation Campa

dministrationthe Federal Rement Area ous lane clos

P) must be deinform thos

provides a guv/wz/info_and

d for develop

Appropriate S

ces

rs

arget Audien

mpaign Mess

munication S

n to Commun

iveness

blic informat

fic (MOT): Fe to deploytour operatio

eployed as nually control

e TMC shouMS upstream e instead of ad should be ed.

to activate nt agency reoperation bas and detect

e law enforguide and dire

n to deactivawhen the free

the conditio

orcement agen the roadway

here should band ensure thith the FDOT

Florida.

aign

n (FHWA) puRegister (69

that occupsures shall coeveloped andse affected buide to Workd_outreach/i

ping a public

Size and Nat

ces

sage(s)

Strategies

nicate

tion campaig

FDOT, local MOT with

on. Portable eeded to pro the detour s

uld initialize of the cong

a compulsorymade availa

a detour is sponsible fo

ased on infoors.

rcement ageect all resour

ate a detour eway travel ons on the fr

ency in coordy.

be an after-that intended T traffic incid

blished the WFR 54562).

pies a locatiomply with thd implementeby the projeck Zone Publicindex.htm.

information

ure of the Ca

n and some e

public worktemporary tchangeable

ovide informsigns based o

the processgestion. The y detour. Portable by the t

based on tr the particu

ormation rec

ency responrces required

route is madtime is lessreeway have

dination with

he-fact reviecommunicatent managem

Work Zone SPer the Rule

ion for morhe rule. For sed. The TMPct of expectec Information

and outreach

ampaign

examples are

ks departmetraffic contrmessage sig

mation, and ton traffic con

s of displayimessage shtable changetransportatio

the type of ular roadway ceived from

nsible for thd for detour a

de based on than the art

e improved t

h the TMC w

ew of the option and coorment (TIM) m

afety and Moe, the Interste than thresignificant pr

P must included work zonn and Outrea

h campaign a

e provided in

Concept oDynamic D

ents, and tol devices tgns, portableto close lanenditions mon

ing appropriould target

eable messagon agencies

segment imin coordinatlocal agenc

he roadwayactivities.

improvementerial travel to support t

ill direct fiel

eration. Therdination is pmeetings, held

obility Rule (tate System ee days androjects, a Tra

de public infone impacts aach Strategie

are:

n Appendix C.


44

heir privatethat may bee barricades,es or ramps.nitored along

ate travelermotorists in

ge signs mayand/or their

pact due totion with thecies and ITS

y system in

nt in freewaytime. In allhe decision-

d units from

e purpose ofresent. Thisd bi-monthly

(the Rule) onprojects in a

d has eitheransportationormation andnd changing

es located at

.

12

Asandconsecproclocon

. 11B11B11B11BI-95 Ca

a pilot test sd Fuller Warnsidering its ction of I-95ojects will haosures and shnstruction pr

I-95 Wi

I-95 Rig

I-95 Ov

12.1. 64B64B64B64BOpt

Following astudy area,

1. ArteriaLED suThere aadditionprovidinstudy a

2. ArteriatrailblacharactIn additthis opt

Either of thoperating communicasystem.

12.2. 65B65B65B65BStu

The DDS imParkway anroute to I-9routes to trailblazers

1. Urban SBridge.segmen

2. SuburbinterchThis se

3. Rural S2009, other intraffic.

The concep

se Study

study of thisrren Bridge proximity to is the severave a significhifts in traffirojects are ad

dening and R

gid Pavemen

verland Bridg

tions Consid

are the two ty, assuming th

l Dynamic Tb-panels to

are a maximn to the statng flexibility

area, 11 mainli

l Dynamic Mzer and arteters with twotion to the etion to suppo

he two optioand control

ation betwee

udy Area

mplementatind Fuller Wa95 for this dimplement t

s. The study a

Segment: Inc In 2009, thnt has eight p

an Segmentange. In 200gment has th

Segment: Inclthis segmennterchanges

pt layout of a

concept of ohas been se

o I-95 and theral significancant impact ic pattern todjacent to ea

Reconstructio

nt Rehabilitat

ge Replaceme

deration

ypes of dynahere will be fi

Trailblazer Opdisplay actioum three LEic sign panel for displayiine freeway D

Message Sigerial dynamio lines of texexisting freewort the opera

ons would reling the det

en regional T

on study arerren Bridge. detour operathe detour oarea is divide

cludes the pois segment spartial and fu

: Includes th09, this segmhree intercha

ludes the port served a mwithin this s

arterial DMS a

operation dolected. US 1e number of

nt constructioon the traff

o complete thach other and

on - between

tion - betwee

ent - between

mic detour siber optic ne

ption: This oon messages

ED sub panelss. This optionng action mDMS are prop

gn Option: Tic message

xt. This optionway DMS wittion.

quire SunGutour systemTMCs and lo

ea includes US 1 runs pa

ation. There operation. Ted into three

ortion of I-95served a maxull interchang

he portion ofment served anges includi

rtion of I-95 maximum ansegment and

and trailblaze

cument, a po runs parallelanes it servon projects tfic operationhe constructd are program

n Internationa

en SR 9A/I-29

n Atlantic Bo

system optiotwork covera

option consiss and cardinas that may bn may requiressages. In aposed in this

This option csigns. The an provides mhin the stud

ide® softwam. In additioocal agencies

approximatearallel to I-9are several

These ITS demajor segme

5 between thximum averages to be out

f I-95 betwea maximum ng the US 1 i

between Intnual averagethe general

er options ar

ortion of I-95el to I-95 anes in each dithat are plan

ns within thetion activitiesmmed to be c

al Golf Parkw

95 and Atlan

oulevard and

ns that are cage available

sts of a comal directionsbe required tre a higher nuaddition to t option to su

consists of arterial DMS

maximum flexy area, 11 ma

are modificaton, as discuss would also

ely 30 miles95 in the stud

ITS devicesevices are aents where t

he US 1 soutage annual dtfitted for de

een Race Traaverage annnterchange t

ernational Ge daily traffvicinity of th

re shown in F

5 between Intnd may servrection. The

nned over th region. Thes in this sectconstructed

way and SR 9

ntic Boulevar

Fuller Warre

considered toe along the ar

mposite trailbs with arrow to form a coumber of signthe existing upport the op

a combinatS is a smallexibility for infainline freew

tion to integssed earliero be require

s of I-95 betdy area and

s that are dea combinatiothe detour ro

h interchangaily traffic otour operatio

ack Road annual daily trato be outfitte

olf Parkway ic of 73,000he corridor s

Figures 15 thr

Concept oDynamic D

ternational Gve as an alte

reason for she next five yere may be ption. The follin the next f

9A/I-295

rd

en Bridge

o be deployedrterial corrid

blazer sign tand static s

omplete sign ns and has afreeway DM

peration.

ion of arterer size DMS formation dis

way DMS are

rate the funr, the centeed to operat

tween Internis used as t

eployed alonon of arteri

outes are ava

ge and the Fof 140,000 von.

d Philips Higaffic of 116,0ed for detour

and Race Tr0 vehicles. Tserves mostly

rough 22.


45

Golf Parkwayernate routeelection thisyears. Theseperiodic lanelowing threeive years:

d in the pilotdors too:

hat includessigns panels.assembly inlimitation inS within the

rial dynamicwith 12-14”

ssemination.proposed in

ctionality ofr to centere the signal

national Golfhe alternateg these twoal DMS and

ailable:

uller Warrenehicles. This

ghway south00 vehicles.

r operation.

rack Road. InThere are noy residential

12.3. 66B66B66B66BEsc

1. The TMcollecte

2. The TMFollowelocal ro

3. The TMagencieplans, a

4. The TMmultipleinformadelay. Ishould

5. Appropcongesassess decisio

6. The declaw enfthe detcamera

7. The TMupstreainsteadshould

8. In an apersonnWhen talerted

9. Transpotraffic cto imple

10. The lawand dire

12.4. 67B67B67B67BDe-

1. The TMactivity

2. The deconditio

3. In all caback to

4. The lawentities

12.5. 68B68B68B68BAft

An after acor on a muand convenmanageme

calation Pro

MC detects ted through v

MC should veed by notificaoads.

MC and law enes to solicit sand regional

MC should ase segment oation from thf the travel tbe activated

priate channtion period. Tthe impacts

n making and

cision is madforcement agtour operatioas and detect

MC should initam of the cond of a compulbe made ava

absence of Inel should mthe freeway to be prepar

ortation agecontrol devicement the de

w enforcemenect all resour

-escalation

MC should coy.

cision to deaons, essentia

ases, the TMo normal to su

w enforcemes to open the

ter Action R

ction review sutually agreene all stakehnt (TIM) mee

ocedure

the slow dowarious sourc

erify the infoation to the

nforcement asupport in acplans should

ssess the imr corridor imhe arterial rotime differen and the age

els of commTraffic cames of congestd accurate in

de on the tygency responon based on itors.

tialize the prngestion tail.lsory detour.

ailable by the

TS coverageonitor detoutravel time ired to de-esc

ncies and theces such as petour operati

nt agency rerces required

Procedure

ntinuously m

activate the ally when the

MC should coupport the de

ent agency ine roadway.

Review

should be heed time and dolders at one

etings, held b

wn or congees.

ormation usinlaw enforcem

agencies shoctivating the

be available

pact of congmpacts. This aoad considernce is 20 minncies should

munication mera and detection. All staknformation fo

pe of segmensible for theinformation r

rocess of dis. The messag. Portable ch

e transportat

e along the r operation cis less than calate detour

eir private coportable chanion. Manual o

sponsible ford for detour a

monitor traffi

detour route freeway tra

nfirm if the ecision-maki

n coordinatio

ld with all thday. The FDOe place. Thisi-monthly at

estion on an

ng traffic cament agencie

uld coordinadynamic det to decision m

gestion on thaction shoulded for detouutes betwee continue mo

must be opector informatkeholder age

or the motori

nt impact due particular rreceived from

playing apprge should tarhangeable meion agencies

arterial roadcontinuously arterial trav

r operation.

ontractors shngeable messoperation of t

r the roadwaactivities.

c camera an

e should bevel time is le

conditions ong process.

on with the

e stakeholdeOT traffic incs review can

the FDOT of

ny portion of

meras and des that cont

te with the lotour system.makers.

he freeway ad be immedi

ur as well as n freeway an

onitoring the

ened ahead tion should bencies shoulsts.

ue to congesroadway in com local agen

opriate traverget motoristessage signs and/or their

ds, law enfo until freewa

vel time, the

hould be avasage signs, pthe detour si

ay system in

nd detector i

made basedess than arte

n I-95 have

TMC will dir

ers involved icident manaalso be com

ffice in Jacks

f the I-95. T

detectors tharols the port

ocal transpo. This plan, a

and should cately followeon I-95 to c

nd arterial roe detector inf

of the recbe accessed d work toge

stion – urbanoordination wcies and ITS

eler informatts in giving a may be user private con

orcement anday traffic con

law enforce

ailable to depportable barrigns may be

coordination

nformation f

d on improverial travel tim

improved to

ect field uni

immediately gement team

mbined with tsonville, Flori

Concept oDynamic D

This informa

at are availations of the h

rtation and pgency direct

consider singed by collectcalculate travoadway, thenformation.

urring or noon a continu

ether to pro

n, suburban owith the TMCsystems, su

tion on the fan alternate d to guide mtractors, whe

d transportanditions returement officer

ploy MOT witricades, and trequired.

n with the TM

from the ons

ement in freme.

o return traff

its from all p

after the dem should leathe FDOT traida, if time pe


52

ation can be

able on I-95.highway and

public safetytives, county

gle segment,ing detectorvel time and

n the detours

on-recurringuous basis toomote sound

or rural. TheC will initiateuch as traffic

reeway DMSroute choice

motorists anden needed.

ation agencyrn to normal.rs should be

h temporarytraffic cones

MC will guide

set of detour

eeway traffic

fic operation

participating

tour activityd this effort

affic incidentermits.

12.6. 69B69B69B69BPre

The prelimplans in Figand arteriaused and pr

The sourceitem list.

Based on tthan the arthe two con

12.7. 70B70B70B70BI-29

In addition loop. This lSR 202/Bunatural rouwith I-95.

I-95 mainliinterchangeAlso, the reongoing freoperation b

eliminary Co

inary cost esgures 15 thrual dynamic mreliminary co

Ta

of this prelim

he preliminarterial dynamncepts.

95/SR 9A L

to previous oop connect

utler Boulevaute of choice

ine has sevees. In additioemaining poreeway manabetween thes

ost Estimate

stimates areu 20. The cosmessage signost estimate

ble 7. Prelim

Device

Arterial Trailb

Arterial DMS

Mainline DM

Total System

minary cost e

ary cost estimmic trailblaze

Loop Alterna

three segmes to all majo

ard, Beach Be to carry ad

eral existingon, there arertion of the Igement syst

se interchang

es and Num

e derived frost estimates . The followiof each optio

inary Cost E

es ArtTra

blazer

S

MS

m Cost $

estimate is F

mates, the aer option. Ap

ate Route C

ents, the othr roadways toulevard, At

dditional traf

freeway DMe several ex-295/SR 9A

tems projectges.

mber of Devic

m the numbeare divided ng table proon.

stimate and

terial Dynamicailblazer Optio

52

‐

11

$7,777,730.26

FDOT historic

rterial DMS pendix D pro

Concept

er alternate that also intetlantic Bouleffic between

MS signs in isting freewa

A loop will sots in Northea

ces Used

er of ITS sysinto the two

ovides the in

Number of D

c n

ArteriaOpt

1

3

1

$11,342

cal bid costs,

option will covides the de

route to I-9ersect with Ivard, Heckscthe south a

advance of ay DMS alonon have maiast Florida. F

stems showno options: artformation on

Devices Used

al DMS tion

17

31

11

2,965.62

, listed in the

ost approximetailed prelim

5 through tr-95 such as cher Drive, eand north I-2

the I-295/Sng the southnline DMS atFigure 21 sh

Concept oDynamic D

n in the detoterial dynamin the numbe

e 12/08/2010

mately $3.6 minary cost

raffic is the II-10, Baymea

etc. Hence, it295/SR 9A i

SR 9A northwest quadrat critical juncows the con


53

our conceptsic trailblazer

er of devices

0 master pay

million moreestimate for

-295/SR 9Aadows Road,t becomes anterchanges

h and southant of I-295.ctions in thencept detour

I-29

5/SR

9A

A

LTER

NAT

E R

OU

TE

C

ON

CEP

T

SEG

ME

NT:

BE

TW

EE

N I-

295/

SR

9A

NO

RT

H A

ND

SO

UT

H

INT

ER

CH

AN

GE

FIG

UR

E -

21

PAG

E -

54

NOT TO SCALE

I-295/SR 9A SOUTH INTERCHANGE

I-295/SR 9A NORTH INTERCHANGE

SR 9A DETOUR ROUTE

I-295 DETOUR ROUTE

N

13

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

. 12B12B12B12BReferenc

Alternate Rpp. 1-89 (PD

Integrated Federal HigMB).

Integrated Alternative2006 (PDF

Integrated Task 2.3 –I#FHWA-JP

I-75 Corrid2009 (PDF

Integrated 2000 (PDF

Integrated Departmen

Integrated New York M

Integrated (NITTEC) T

. Peeta, Srinusing LimitManagemeReport, pp.

Miller, Mark(Analysis, Mof Californi

. Zhang, WeiCalifornia P1425, pp. 1-

ces

Route HandbDF 3.6 MB).

Corridor Maghway Admin

Corridor Mae Definitions, 67 KB).

Corridor MaICMS Concep

PO-06-032, p

dor Managem 15.4 MB).

Corridor MaF 1.2 MB).

Corridor Trat of Transpo

TransportatiMetropolitan

Corridor Mransportatio

ivas, Hu, Shoted Link Traf

ent Framewor 1-60, Octobe

k A. and SkaModeling, anda, Berkeley,

i-Bin et al., SPath Program-56, Novemb

book, Federa

anagement Anistration pu

anagement Phs, Federal Hi

anagement Copt of Operat

pp. 1-109, Apr

ment Final Con

anagement F

affic Managemrtation, pp. 1

tion and LandTransportat

Management n Operations

ou-Ren, Chu, ffic Counts: S

ork, NexTranser 2009 (PD

bardonis, A.,d Simulation)ISSN 1055-14

Study of Integm, Institute oer 2008 (PD

al Highway A

Analysis, Modblication #F

hase I concepighway Adm

oncept Develtions for a Gil 2006 (PDF

ncept of Ope

Final Evaluat

ment System-136, March 1

d Use Planninion Council, p

Requiremens, pp 1-59, Ja

Chun-Hsiao,Strategic Deps and USDOTF 1.2 MB).

, San Diego In), California P425, pp. 1-63

egrated Corriof TransportF 1.9 MB).

Administratio

deling, and SHWA-JPO-09

ept Developmministration p

elopment and Generic CorridF 1.6 MB).

erations Repo

tion Report,

m (Minnesota 1996 (PDF 8.

ng – Facilitatipp. 1-56, Jan

nts Documenanuary 2010 (

, and Liou, Hployment of VT Region V

I-15 IntegratePath Program

3, March 2010

idor Managemtation Studie

on, Publicatio

Simulation R9-001 EDL 14

ment and Founpublication #

d Foundationaidor, Federal

ort, Michigan

Minnesota D

a Implementa.0 MB).

ting coordinatnuary 2009 (

nt, Niagara (PDF 3.7 MB

an-Tsung. NeVehicle DeteRegional Un

ted Corridor Mm, Institute o0 (PDF 794 K

ment for Sanes, University

on# FHWA-H

Results for th4440, pp. 1-1

undational Re#FHWA-JPO

al Research, Highway Ad

Department

Department

ation) User M

tion across aPDF 1.2 MB).

Internationa).

Network Originectors throug

iversity Tran

Managementof TransportKB).

n Francisco By of Californ

Concept oDynamic D

HOP-06-092,

he Test Corr117, June 200

esearch: Task-06-034, pp

Technical Mdministration

t of Transpor

of Transpor

Manual Repor

and Among P

al Technolog

in-Destinationgh an Integransportation C

t (ICM) Systeation Studies

Bay Area I-8ia, Berkeley,


55

, May 2006,

ridor Report,08 (PDF 2.0

k 3.1 Developp. 1-10, April

Memorandum,n publication

rtation, June

rtation, April

rt, Minnesota

Practitioners,

gy Coalition

on Estimationated CorridorCenter Final

em: Statge IIs, University

880 Corridor,, ISSN 1055-

p

nr

I

Documents

Concept of Operations and Standard Operating Proceduresnorthfloridatpo.com/images/uploads/docs/Dynamic_Detour_Final... · Concept of Operations and Standard Operating Procedures