Upload
season
View
65
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A Guide to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Organ Procurement Organization Reports www.srtr.org. Conceptual Framework for OPO Measures. OPOs can be assessed for performance at several points during the organ procurement process. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A Guide to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Organ Procurement Organization Reportswww.srtr.org
Conceptual Framework for OPO Measures
• OPOs can be assessed for performance at several points during the organ procurement process.
• Steps are discussed in the following slides, including the current state of development of each metric and data limitations.
Step 1: Identify Eligible Deaths
• Metric: Eligible deaths per notifiable death.
• Development: Historically available on the SRTR website with
comparisons to expected rates before January 2008.• Limitations:
Eligible deaths historically self-reported aggregate counts.
Step 2: Convert Eligible Deaths to Donors• Metric:
Donors per eligible death.• Development:
Historically available on the SRTR website with comparison to expected rates (not in January 2008).
• Limitations Eligible deaths are currently self-reported aggregate counts. Does not include DCD or donors aged > 70 years. Current models for “expected” donation rates are limited to
information about the hospitals where the deaths occurred, which is not much better than crude rates.
Models will likely be improved by accounting for the characteristics of individual eligible deaths (data to be collected by the OPTN beginning January 9, 2008).
Specific underlying adjustment data from AHA cannot be shared. Alternative sources are being explored.
Step 3: Recovered and Transplanted Organs• Metric:
Organs recovered and transplanted per donor.• Development:
Crude rates available on the SRTR website, stratified by donor type.
Methods for modeling an expected yield per donor are under consideration.
• Limitations: Statistical test is not straightforward for the combined observed
vs. expected yield because recovery of different organs from the same donor are not independent events.
Multiple factors, including factors external to the OPO, influence this outcome.
www.srtr.org Table Description
1 Organs recovered and transplanted per donor
2 Centers transplanting organs/exports
3 Adjusted measures of donation rates, DSA
3A Adjusted measures of donation rates, hospital
4 Donor characteristics
5 Donor characteristics by organ
6 Percent undergoing transplant, waitlisted patients
7 Time to transplant, waitlisted patients
8 Recipient characteristics
9 Coverage area: Counties assigned to DSA
Table 1: Organs Recovered/Transplanted per Deceased Donor
• N and % of recovered (and transplanted) organs or donors per donor type. includes organs exported to other DSAs. segmented organs may count for more than one transplant
(n transplants may be > n recovered).• National averages.• Separate reporting by donor type (instead of adjustment).• “Donors”: at least one organ recovered for transplant.
This DSA US
Donors Organs Organs
Recovered Transplanted Rec. Transplanted
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor Type
% TX Per Donor Type
Per Donor Type
% TX
All Donors 239/239=100.0 793 3.32 664 2.78 83.7 3.52 3.09 87.7
Intestine 6 0.03 6 0.03 6 0.03 100 0.02 0.02 89.8
Kidney 204 0.85 408 1.71 333 1.39 81.6 1.77 1.49 84.1
Pancreas 43 0.18 43 0.18 35 0.15 81.4 0.27 0.21 77.1
Liver 208 0.87 208 0.87 175 0.73 84.1 0.88 0.82 93.1
Lung 29 0.12 55 0.23 48 0.2 87.3 0.27 0.26 95.9
Heart 73 0.31 73 0.31 69 0.29 94.5 0.3 0.3 98.4
793 organs recovered from 239 donors
This DSA US
Donors Organs Organs
Recovered Transplanted Rec. Transplanted
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor Type
% TX Per Donor Type
Per Donor Type
% TX
All Donors 239/239=100.0 793 3.32 664 2.78 83.7 3.52 3.09 87.7
Intestine 6 0.03 6 0.03 6 0.03 100 0.02 0.02 89.8
Kidney 204 0.85 408 1.71 333 1.39 81.6 1.77 1.49 84.1
Pancreas 43 0.18 43 0.18 35 0.15 81.4 0.27 0.21 77.1
Liver 208 0.87 208 0.87 175 0.73 84.1 0.88 0.82 93.1
Lung 29 0.12 55 0.23 48 0.2 87.3 0.27 0.26 95.9
Heart 73 0.31 73 0.31 69 0.29 94.5 0.3 0.3 98.4
= 3.32 organs recovered per donor
This DSA US
Donors Organs Organs
Recovered Transplanted Rec. Transplanted
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor Type
% TX Per Donor Type
per Donor Type
% TX
All Donors 239/239=100.0 793 3.32 664 2.78 83.7 3.52 3.09 87.7
Intestine 6 0.03 6 0.03 6 0.03 100 0.02 0.02 89.8
Kidney 204 0.85 408 1.71 333 1.39 81.6 1.77 1.49 84.1
Pancreas 43 0.18 43 0.18 35 0.15 81.4 0.27 0.21 77.1
Liver 208 0.87 208 0.87 175 0.73 84.1 0.88 0.82 93.1
Lung 29 0.12 55 0.23 48 0.2 87.3 0.27 0.26 95.9
Heart 73 0.31 73 0.31 69 0.29 94.5 0.3 0.3 98.4
664 organs transplanted from 239 donors
This DSA US
Donors Organs Organs
Recovered Transplanted Rec. Transplanted
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor Type
% TX Per Donor Type
Per Donor Type
% TX
All Donors 239/239=100.0 793 3.32 664 2.78 83.7 3.52 3.09 87.7
Intestine 6 0.03 6 0.03 6 0.03 100 0.02 0.02 89.8
Kidney 204 0.85 408 1.71 333 1.39 81.6 1.77 1.49 84.1
Pancreas 43 0.18 43 0.18 35 0.15 81.4 0.27 0.21 77.1
Liver 208 0.87 208 0.87 175 0.73 84.1 0.88 0.82 93.1
Lung 29 0.12 55 0.23 48 0.2 87.3 0.27 0.26 95.9
Heart 73 0.31 73 0.31 69 0.29 94.5 0.3 0.3 98.4
= 2.78 transplanted organs per donor
This DSA U.S.
Donors Organs Organs
Recovered Transplanted Rec. Transplanted
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor Type
% TX Per Donor Type
Per Donor Type
% TX
All Donors 239/239=100.0 793 3.32 664 2.78 83.7 3.52 3.09 87.7
Intestine 6 0.03 6 0.03 6 0.03 100 0.02 0.02 89.8
Kidney 204 0.85 408 1.71 333 1.39 81.6 1.77 1.49 84.1
Pancreas 43 0.18 43 0.18 35 0.15 81.4 0.27 0.21 77.1
Liver 208 0.87 208 0.87 175 0.73 84.1 0.88 0.82 93.1
Lung 29 0.12 55 0.23 48 0.2 87.3 0.27 0.26 95.9
Heart 73 0.31 73 0.31 69 0.29 94.5 0.3 0.3 98.4
664/793 (83.7%) of organs recovered were transplanted
This DSA US
Donors Organs Organs
Recovered Transplanted Rec. Transplanted
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor type
Count Per Donor Type
% TX Per Donor Type
Per Donor Type
% TX
All Donors 239/239=100.0 793 3.32 664 2.78 83.7 3.52 3.09 87.7
Intestine 6 0.03 6 0.03 6 0.03 100 0.02 0.02 89.8
Kidney 204 0.85 408 1.71 333 1.39 81.6 1.77 1.49 84.1
Pancreas 43 0.18 43 0.18 35 0.15 81.4 0.27 0.21 77.1
Liver 208 0.87 208 0.87 175 0.73 84.1 0.88 0.82 93.1
Lung 29 0.12 55 0.23 48 0.2 87.3 0.27 0.26 95.9
Heart 73 0.31 73 0.31 69 0.29 94.5 0.3 0.3 98.4
All of the statistics from this DSA were lower than the US averages
Reporting by Donor Types
• Heart-beating. SCD: standard criteria donor.
• Aged younger than 60 years and not DCD or ECD. ECD: expanded criteria donor (KI-donor type).
• Heart-beating donors aged older than 60 years and aged between 50 and 59 years meeting 2 of the following 3 conditions: died of stroke, history of hypertension, serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL.
• Non-heart beating. DCD: donation after cardiac death.
Table 3: Measures of Donation Rates: Two Processes
• Notifiable deaths: DSA-wide in-hospital deaths of patients aged 0-70 years with no exclusionary medical diagnosis for possible donation,† mean 5.4 (eligible deaths per 100 notifiable deaths).
• Eligible deaths*: OPO-reported aggregate eligible deaths from hospitals (excludes cardiac deaths).
• Deceased donors: at least 1 organ recovered.*Eligible: Aged 0-70 years, death by neurological criteria, no exclusionary medical conditions.†Ojo AO, et al. A practical approach to evaluate the potential donor pool and trends in
cadaveric kidney donation. Transplantation 1999; 67:548-566.
Donation Rate:
Deceased DonorsEligible Deaths*
Notification Rate:
Eligible Deaths*
Notifiable Deaths, DSA
and
Crude (Observed) Donation Rate
• Eligible deaths. OPTN definition (heart-beating, aged < 71 years,
acceptable cause of death).• Eligible donors (subset of eligible deaths).
Aged < 71 years and not DCD becoming donors.• Crude donation rate.
100 * eligible donors/eligible deaths.• Additional donors.
Not eligible deaths. Aged > 70 years plus DCD.
This DSA/OPO Average
Observed donation measures
Deceased donors (all) 162 138
Deceased donors meeting eligibility criteria 135 121
Additional donors (aged > 70 years, DCD) 27 17
Eligible deaths 232 190
Crude donation rate1 (donors per 100 eligible deaths) 58.2 63.7
Crude organ-specific rates 2 (organs per 100 eligible deaths)
Kidney 53.0 57.5
Liver 54.7 57.0
Heart 17.7 20.6
Lung 7.8 11.9
Pancreas 19.0 17.7
135 eligible donors/232 eligible deaths = 58% donation rate.
This DSA/OPO Average
Observed donation measures
Deceased donors (all) 162 138
Deceased donors meeting eligibility criteria 135 121
Additional donors (aged > 70 eyars, DCD) 27 17
Eligible deaths 232 190
Crude donation rate1 (donors per 100 eligible deaths) 58.2 63.7
Crude organ specific rates2 (organs per 100 eligible deaths)
Kidney 53.0 57.5
Liver 54.7 57.0
Heart 17.7 20.6
Lung 7.8 11.9
Pancreas 19.0 17.7
27 additional donors not included in the donation rate calculations.
Percentage of Additional Donors* Among All Deceased Donors by OPO
*Donors aged >70 years and donors after cardiac death not currently included in SRTR conversion calculations.
Average Conversion and Discard Rates for All OPOs 2002-2006
HRSA collaboratives began in April 2003.Source: SRTR analysis, August 2007.
Adjustments Used for Expected Rates
• Notification rate: age, sex, race, and cause of death. Source: NCHS Population Death Record
• Donation rate 1: trauma center, MSA size, CMS case mix index, total bed size, ICU beds, children’s hospital, resident training program, neurological services, hospital control/ownership. Source: AHA Survey.
• Donation rate 2: as above, plus notification rate.
Standardized Donation Rate Model
• “What donation rate would we expect for this DSA, given the characteristics of the hospitals in its service area?” Trauma center, MSA size, CMS case mix index, total bed size, ICU beds,
neurological service, resident training program, children’s hospital, hospital control/ownership. Source: AHA Survey
• ASDR = SDR with an adjustment for notifiable deaths.• Standardized ratio: observed rate/expected rate.• Statistical comparisons:
Compare observed to expected counts, 2-sided p-value. 95% confidence limits for standardized ratio.
How to Compare Crude Rates to Expected Rates
Measure of Donation Observed Expected5,6,7 p-value8
Notification rate (eligible deaths per 100 notifiable deaths) 5.3 4.6 0.339
Donation rate (hospital characteristics)6 58.2 65.9 0.043
Kidney-specific rate 53.0 59.5 0.102
Liver-specific rate 54.7 58.7 0.316
Heart-specific rate 17.7 19.5 0.514
Lung-specific rate 7.8 10.5 0.161
Pancreas-specific rate 19.0 17.6 0.592
Almost 8 fewer organs were recovered than expected. Given the characteristics of the hospitals
in this DSA, this difference is significantly lower than expected.
This DSA/OPO Standardized 95% Confidence Interval10
Measure of Donation Observed Expected5,6,7 P-value8 Ratio9 Lower Upper
Notification rate 5.3 4.6 0.339 1.15 1.16 0.86
Donation rate (hospital) 58.2 65.9 0.043 0.88 0.88 0.78
Kidney-specific rate 53.0 59.5 0.102 0.89 0.89 0.78
Liver-specific rate 54.7 58.7 0.316 0.93 0.93 0.82
Heart-specific rate 17.7 19.5 0.514 0.91 0.91 0.67
Lung-specific rate 7.8 10.5 0.161 0.74 0.74 0.44
Pancreas-specific rate 19.0 17.6 0.592 1.08 1.08 0.80
The observed donation rate is 12% lower than the expected donation rate.
This DSA/OPO
Measure of donation Observed Expected5,6,7 P-value8
Notification rate (eligible deaths per 100 notifiable deaths) 5.3 4.6 0.339
Donation rate (hospital characteristics)6 58.2 65.9 0.043
Kidney-specific rate 53.0 59.5 0.102
Liver-specific rate 54.7 58.7 0.316
Heart-specific rate 17.7 19.5 0.514
Lung-specific rate 7.8 10.5 0.161
Pancreas-specific rate 19.0 17.6 0.592
Donation rate
(hospital characteristics, notification rate)7 58.2 64.3 0.062
Kidney-specific rate 53.0 58.4 0.113
Liver-specific rate 54.7 57.1 0.510
Heart-specific rate 17.7 21.1 0.232
Lung-specific rate 7.8 12.2 0.042
Pancreas-specific rate 19.0 18.4 0.877
Donation rates adjusted for hospital characteristics AND notification rate.
Why Suppress Expected Rates Now?
• Statistics intended for quality improvement purposes.
• Lack of data for individual eligible deaths does not allow for substantive statistical adjustment.
• Data currently available for use in the models cannot currently be released to OPOs or the public.
• Important to assess the sources of variation in donation rates among the OPOs before finalizing the methods for assigning statistical significance to the comparisons.
Future Changes
• Donation rates will be adjusted when eligible death characteristics are collected: Age Race Sex Cause of death
Pilot Study of Individual Eligible Death Data
• 11 OPOs were selected as a representative sample.
• A multivariate model with age, race, sex, US citizenship, cause of death was highly significant (chi-square = 130, P < 0.0001), indicating that the factors were useful predictors of donation.
OPTN Collection of Individual Eligible Death Data
• Began January 9, 2008.
• Includes data on age, sex, race/ethnicity, and cause of death for each eligible death.
• Improves the modeling of expected conversion rates.
• Expect to begin using models after 1 year of data collection.
Additional Measures: Access to Transplant
• Components of variation: OPO and transplant center.
• OPO Table 6: percent transplanted by point in time.
• OPO Table 7: median waiting time.
• CSR Table 3: adjusted transplant rate.
Contact the SRTR
• www.srtr.org
• (877) 970-SRTR