30
Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Conceptual Framework of Program Design

Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering

20th October 2011

Page 2: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Purpose

Setting the stage and foundation for program design in the context of an RTO, with theory and core principles

Page 3: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Picking Races and Creating Wins through Collaboration

Normal Model?

I-CAN/Client Model?

Page 4: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Collaboration – what is it?

• Collaboration is working together to achieve a goal. o It is a recursive process where....organizations work

together to realize shared goals, by sharing knowledge, learning and building consensus.

Page 5: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

What is an RTO?

• Research and Technology Organisations (RTOs) are specialised knowledge organisations dedicated to the development and transfer of science and technology to the benefit of the economy and society.

• RTOs make a vital contribution to strengthening a region's economic performance by supporting product and process innovation in all branches of government, industry and services - in firms large and small - as well as by developing technologies which contribute to improved living standards and higher quality of life.

• RTOs build bridges between basic research and industrial applications. o They are innovative and competitive problem-solvers for all sectors of industry and services. o They are technology developers, adapters and transfer intermediaries, helping to ensure

more effective exploitation of research by the enterprise sector. o They are state-of-the-art technology specialists providing expertise which customers do not

possess or cannot afford individually to maintain in-house. o They are generic and sectoral know-how suppliers, fashioning multidisciplinary solutions fitted

to the needs of specific industries and trades, traditional sectors and SMEs.

Page 6: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Characteristics of World Class Organizations• Clear vision of what needs to be done• Common understanding, buy-in and alignment to vision• Knows processes better than competitors, uses best-practices and

standards to maximum advantage• Knows its industry competitors better than anyone else• Knows its customers better than anyone else• Adapts to a changing environment and can respond rapidly to customer

behaviours• Demonstrates its value offering clearly• Has employees who are motivated and effectively utilized • Innovative and committed to continuous improvement• Competes for a market share on a customer-by-customer basis,

exceeds customer expectations• Measures its performance and has a balanced perspective

Page 7: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Ten Best RTO Practices for Success

1. Understand drivers for industry change

2. Coordinate R&D with long range business plans

3. Focus on end-use customer needs

4. Agree upon clear, measurable project goals

5. Formal development process

6. Cross-functional teams

7. Coordinate development & commercialization

8. Determine, understand & measure end-user needs

9. Refine projects with customer feedback

10.Hire/maintain the best people and expertise

Page 8: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Technology Readiness LevelLevel Definition

1 DESKTOP. Initiate transfer of scientific research to applied research and development.

2DESKTOP. Identification and/ or evaluation of possible applications of the technology.

3 First level of PROOF OF CONCEPT. Analytical and bench scale study of key elements of the technology.

4LABORATORY. Bench scale study of the technology as a whole.

5 LABORATORY AND/OR PILOT. Bench scale study of integrated system in simulated application.

6PILOT. Scale up of technology and testing in simulated application.

7DEMONSTRATION. Full scale demonstration of technology in industry setting.

8COMMERCIAL. End of development, handover to commercial implementation.

9COMMERCIAL. Continued improvements implemented.

Page 9: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Evolution of Innovation Metrics1st Generation Input

Indicators

(1950s-60s)

2nd Generation Output indicators

(1970s-80s)

3rd Generation Innovation Indicators

(1990s)

4th Generation Process Indicators

(2000 + emerging focus)

R&D expenditures

S&T Personnel

Capital

Tech intensity

Patents

Publications

Products

Quality Change

Innovation surveys

Indexing

Benchmarking innovation capacity

Knowledge

Intangibles

Networks

Demand

Clusters

Management techniques

Risk/Return

System Dynamics

Page 10: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Strategic Management Construct

Outcomes

Programs

Processes Outputs

Measures

Inputs

$

People, Facilities, Equipment

ROLE

Strategic

Operational

Page 11: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Corporate Management Principles

• Vision• Mission/Mandate• Values• Strategic Plan – 3 to 5 years outlooko Longer term Goals and outcomes - measures

• Operating Plan – fiscal yearo Annual Goals and outcomes – measures

• Staff Performance Management and Recognition

Page 12: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Creating Clarity – Start with Definitions

• Portfolio: a client sector segment falling within RTO’s operating mandate

• Portfolio Outcome: a definitive goal in respect to a challenge or opportunity within the sector

• Program: a portfolio of projects (or activities) focused on reaching desired program and portfolio outcomes

• Project: a tactical activity undertaken to create a unique product, service or result

• Project management focuses on delivering the specific objectives of the project – program management is focused on achieving the strategic objectives and benefits of the integrated program

Page 13: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Programs need ProjectsParameter Program Management Project Management

Organisation Semi-Permanent Transient

Organisational Alignment Analogous to building a new company

Team alignment

Outline Definition Strategic business outcome Defined scope, schedule and budget

Risk Management All risks associated with strategy

Management of assumed risks

Execution Planning Program wide execution plan

Project execution plan

Stakeholder Engagement Identification and integration of stakeholder interests – effective CRM

Interaction as needed to advanced project

Page 14: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Background Reading

• Relative shortage of good papersoSome elements availableoMore about process than practical operations

• Learn by doing• Based on standard business plan

development

Page 15: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Program Principles

• RTO will “compete” on the basis of program leadership

• “RTO” will build and manage programs for the benefit of XXX – outcomes through our clients

• Program performance guides us• Focus

Page 16: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Technology Roadmaps?

Program Plan

Page 17: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Stage Gating: 10 Steps to Effective Program Management1. Critical issues and outcome target identification

2. Technology and deployment gaps

3. Corporate role/Mandate alignment

4. Stakeholders and partners

5. Deployment pathways and strategies

6. Program definition – objectives, budgets, milestones

7. Cost benefit

8. Key risks and success probabilities

9. Leadership plan

10.Program implementation

Page 18: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Program Design Process

• Iterative process of reflection and “market” testing to refine program definition

• Stakeholder engagement criticalo Management supporto Customer interesto Partnership interest

• Effective design often secures early commitments to build momentum

Page 19: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Why Programs/Projects Fail?

Inappropriate leadership style, lack of vision, unrealistic expectations, Ill-defined scope, poor role definition, inadequate communications, lack of buy-in, low morale, lack of training and skills, poor teaming, lack of culture conducive to program and project management, lack of trust, poor scope & estimates, unrealistic timeframe, inefficient resource allocation, no change mgmt, mismanagement of projects, management in wrong roles, unrealistic goals, lacks enough milestones, lack of termination policy….

Page 20: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

What’s the Question?

Page 21: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Program Assessment

• Need – issue with objective rationale• Value – quantified• Impact – minor, low, medium, high• Key risks – define with potential impact• Risk/success – possible, unlikely, likely, almost certain• Investment – overall (multi-year) cost• Benefit/Cost – low, medium, high

30 second clearly understood value proposition – public interest

Difference it will make - clear game plan - easily measured over time

Page 22: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

The Value Proposition - Defining High Impact Program Agendas• Within each area, what big issues do we face?

o What is the driver behind the issue?o Who cares about it (stakeholders and influencers)?o What difference will it make, to whom and when?o Can we define a value proposition?

• What technology gap makes it expensive, hard or impossible to deal with the issue? Do we understand the challenge? How does it fit within the overall system?

• What kind of a program would it take to create a solution?o What critical challenges need to be addressed?o What are the risks – technical, engineering, business, political, economic, regulatory, market and deployment,

schedule, partners and alliances?o Have we done a market assessment?o Do we understand the deployment channels? Do we have the business smarts?

• Can we carve out a natural advantage in and for Canada?o What is the state of the art?o What are others around the world doing in the area?o What would it make sense to do here?

Page 23: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Example – Value Proposition

• Give me money and I’ll give you value? • (I promise)?

Page 24: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Example – Value Proposition

• Increase Alberta’s recoverable gas reserves

• From 150 Tcf• by 12 Tcf• by 2017• through improved recovery technology• at less than $6.50 per thousand scf

– (baseline 2011 - $8.49 per thousand scf)

Page 25: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Depth of Intervention of Program Management Philosophy

Shallow

Deep

Deepest

Degree of Difficulty

Operational

Strategic

Cultural

Paradigm

“What we are doing is right – we just need to do it better”– no change to mission, values, strategy

“The fundamentals are right – but we need to refocus” – change objectives, strategies, possibly mission

“We have to change the way we think and act” – change vision, values and leadership

“We have to recreate the business – or disappear” – change, redefine and recreate the total enterprise

Page 26: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

What is culture?

• Culture is a set of stated and unstated, explicit and implicit beliefs and assumptions that are shared by a group

• Culture is invisible, unconscious, ever-present, and lasting feature that shapes and harmonizes behavior of all members

• Cultures can have subcultures based on geography, gender, age, …

Page 27: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

What does an effective program culture enable?

The business perspective:• Focuses all efforts in the organization towards

the same business goalso Builds delivery capacity within an organizationoMoves program management from a tactical delivery control

mechanism to a strategic organizational competencyoGenerates commitment to organizational initiativeso Sense of purpose

• Focuses on the client(s)• Effective resource allocation

Page 28: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

What does an effective program culture enable?

The human perspective:• The individuals in an organization are the

organization’s most important resources• A mutual program culture with an understanding of

team work and management, can liberate creativity and make use of the knowledge and experiences of all individuals

• Allows all organizational members to know how they influence program outcomes

• Shares the responsibility between all team members for the success of the program

Page 29: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

Building a Program Management Culture Requires:• Senior Management support and (firm) commitment• Common language for talking about programs and

program management• A minimum set of corporate fundamentals:o Linking program management to organizational strategyo Communicationso Risk Management in a Program Environment o Managing Innovation Programso Building Effective Program and project Teamso The Importance of Client Relationships

• Use of change agents to support the change

Page 30: Conceptual Framework of Program Design Ian J. Potter, Vice President Engineering 20 th October 2011

What is a great program? The Outcome!• Works to realize a shared vision that is meaningful and

inspiring to those involved inside and outside the RTO• Fosters a sense of teamwork where individuals feel that

their contribution has been valued and that they have made a difference

• Instils trust & mutual respect both inside and outside the RTO

• Produces a successful track record that has earned recognition from outside the RTO

• Showcases “Region” as a place of innovation• Through industry, builds the “Region” economy