Conceptual Note of Eco-socialism - p.papadongonas

  • Upload
    raopper

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/20/2019 Conceptual Note of Eco-socialism - p.papadongonas

    1/3

     

    1 © Panos Papadongonas (2012) 

    U NIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM 

    College of Social Sciences

    Department of Geography, Urban Planning and International Development

    Panos Papadongonas

    A Conceptual Note of Eco-Socialism

     Definition

    Eco-socialism is a "current of ecological thought and action" (Löwy, 2005, p. 18) that

    encompasses elements of Marxism, socialism, ecology, and radical philosophy (Adams, 2009).

    It adopts the critical views of Marxism about unequal relations between the various social

    classes and it shares the discourses of liberty and human equality that are prevalent in socialist

    thought. Kovel (2007) adds a new dimension to eco-socialism, describing it as a new mode of

     production in which freely associated labor chooses eco-centric values to restore natural

    environment damage. This implies a redefinition of the notion of "wealth" throughestablishing an egalitarian and democratic society and an alternative mode of life in which

    communal ownership of the means of production plays a crucial role (Kovel 2007; Kovel &

    Löwy, 2001). Thus, eco-socialism calls for radical changes in society, a view which it shares

    with some other radical counter-currents such as eco-anarchism. At the same time, it differs

    from some radical discourses, because it has a more anthropocentric character and thus avoids

    the rejection of humanism as presented, for example, in deep ecology (Adams, 2009).

     History

    The foundation for the formulation of eco-socialist theory was laid in the mid-19th century

    when the first criticism of the capitalist-industrial model was expressed by the Romantics

    such as Rousseau and Leroux, whose work embodied a nostalgic attitude towards pre-modernorganic communities (Löwy, 2002). Marx and Engels added their major contributions,

    although they did not utilize ecological terminology (Adams, 2009); indeed there are

    fundamental differences between the "reds" (Marxists) and the "greens" (ecologists).

    Concerns about the environment were incorporated into Marxist thought in the 1930’s

    through the work of dissident Marxists such as Walter Benjamin (Löwy, 2007). Eco-socialism

    as a distinct ideology was developed mainly during the last 30 years (Löwy, 2005) on the

     basis of the aforementioned ideological frameworks. The increasing impact of environmental

    issues and of ecological movements has definitely contributed to the crystallization of this

    ideology. Today the eco-socialist ideas are reflected in the ideology of green parties and the

    so-called "green-red movements" (Löwy, 2002).

     Disciplinary embedding

    Eco-socialism undoubtedly represents the most influential and advanced wing of the

    ecological camp (Löwy, 2002). Thanks to its sensitivity to the interests of the workers and the

     peoples of the South, it occupies a notable position in the field of social sciences (Wallis,

    2001). Furthermore, it is noted by economists for its rejection of capitalist production

    methods within the framework of sustainable development (Löwy, 2002). Consequently, eco-

    socialism is also present in debates about the role of globalizing forces in the spread of

    capitalism and its detrimental practices (Garre, 2000, p. 35). It is no surprise that the political

    response in countries where the capitalist model prevails is to undermine anti-systemic

    movements and to prevent any effort to link production to environmental damage (Garre,

    2000).

  • 8/20/2019 Conceptual Note of Eco-socialism - p.papadongonas

    2/3

     

    2 © Panos Papadongonas (2012) 

     Key authors

    Certain major thinkers over the last 25-30 years have played a role in the development of the

    core of eco-socialist ideas. Amongst others we can distinguish Raymond Williams who

    coined the term "eco-socialism" in his later writings, Rudolf Bahro who published "Building

    the green movement" in 1986, André Gorz who wrote "Capitalism-Socialism-Ecology" in

    1994, and David Pepper who wrote "Eco-socialism: from deep ecology to social justice" in1994 (Adams, 2009; Löwy, 2002). Useful contributions to the eco-socialist theoretical

    framework have also been provided by James O’Connor, Barry Commoner, John Bellamy

    Foster, Joel Kovel, Michael Löwy, Joan Martínez-Alier, Francisco Fernández Buey, Jorge

    Riechman, Jean-Paul Déléage, Jean-Marie Harribey, Elmar Altvater, Frieder Otto Wolf, and

    many others, who publish in journals like Capitalism Nature Socialism and Ecología Politica.

     Relevance to environment and sustainable development

    Eco-socialism requires some conditions to be met in order for the ideology to realize its

    visions, such as the contraction of industrial economies towards a steady state (Bengtsson,

    2002) and the resolution of class divisions to create a new mode of production (Garre, 2000, p.

    29). This implies that continuing economic growth is not necessarily bad (Adams, 2009, p.133), but that people need to lower their standard of living to a level that is a function of real

    social needs (Löwy, 2005). The necessary sacrifices should be born proportionally (Bengtsson,

    2002). According to eco-socialists the problem lies in the way the market functions. They

    accuse it of being narrowly irrational and they call for the "inauguration of a moral economy"

    (Löwy, 2002, p. 130), which leaves behind the fetishism of commodities and follows more

    environmentally-friendly consumption practices while taking into account the earth’s carrying

    capacity (Adams, 2009; Wallis, 2001, pp.137-138). The carrying capacity issue is an

    important aspect of the (mainstream) sustainable development paradigm as described by

    Adams, who stresses that “MSD…does recognize the possibility of biophysical limits within

    which the economy and global society function” (2009, p. 133).

    Criticism

    Eco-socialism has received criticism from socialists and conservatives as well as from

    environmentalists. A great part of the criticism concerns the socialist base of eco-socialism. It

    has been accused of being naive in its view that socialism can solve all problems (Adams,

    2009, p. 180). Dordoy and Mellor (2009) add a new dimension to this criticism by referring to

    the productionist perspective that socialism, and hence eco-socialism, shares with capitalism.

    This perspective, according to them, results in economy and market values being the drivingforce of human society activities, which is not bad per se, but can result in the exacerbation of

    inequalities, especially gender-related. Furthermore, Pepper (1993, in Adams, 2009) has

    expressed his reservations about the apparently confusing cohabitation of Marxist andanarchist ideas in green thought, which in turn forms the basis of eco-socialism. Finally,

    Pepper rejects eco-socialists’ "enthusiasm for new social movements rather than labor as the

     basis for a revolution in both consciousness and material social relations” (Adams, 2009, p.

    180).

    ReferencesAdams, W.M. (2009). Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in a Developing

    World , London: Routledge.

    Bengtsson, J. (2002). Eco-socialism or eco-capitalism? A critical analysis of humanity's

    fundamental choices: Saral Sarkar, Zed books, London and New York, 1999, 304 pp. ISBN 1-856-49600-7,  Ecological Economics, 40, 135 – 137. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00259-2

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09218009http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09218009http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09218009

  • 8/20/2019 Conceptual Note of Eco-socialism - p.papadongonas

    3/3

     

    3 © Panos Papadongonas (2012) 

    Dordoy, A. & Mellor, M. (2000). Ecosocialism and feminism: Deep materialism and the

    contradictions of capitalism, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 11:3, 41 – 61

    Gare, A. (2000). Creating an ecological socialist future, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 11:2,

    23 – 

    40Kovel, J. (2007). What Is Ecosocialism?. Canadian Dimension 41(6), 22 – 26.

    Kovel, J. & Löwy, M. (2001). An ecosocialist manifesto.

    Löwy, M. (2002). From Marx to Ecosocialism, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 13:1, 121 – 133

    Löwy, M. (2005). What is ecosocialism?. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16:2, 15 – 24

    Löwy, M. (2007). Ecosocialism and Democratic Planning. Socialist Register, 43: 294 – 309 

    Wallis, V. (2001). Toward Ecological Socialism, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 12:1, 127 – 

    145