27
Page 1 of 27 Project Evaluation Report: ‘Rebuilding and Sustaining Forest-Based Livelihoods and Encouraging Community Dialogue and Reconciliation in the Casamance’ Evaluation Conducted By: Lamin Bajo, Forestry Department, The Gambia. Report findings were edited by Ansumana Sanneh, CU Casamance Programme Development Officer, and Tony Jansen, CU Country Director. The project under evaluation is ‘Rebuilding and Sustaining Forest-Based Livelihoods and Encouraging Community Dialogue and Reconciliation in the Casamance’ funded by the US Department of State Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations. The project involved supporting the establishment of 6 community-managed forests in the Casamance region of Senegal close to the Gambia border. The project was implemented by UK headquartered international NGO Concern Universal working with local Senegal based partner ASAPID (Association to Support to Peace and Development Initiatives). As the one-year project was coming to an end, Concern Universal requested an evaluation to assess the successes, failures and constraints of the project.

Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Rebuilding and Sustaining Forest-Based Livelihoods and Encouraging Community Dialogue and Reconciliation in the Casamance - an evaluation of project of Concern Universal and ASAPID as partner, funded by US State Department

Citation preview

Page 1: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  1  of  27  

Project Evaluation Report: ‘Rebuilding and Sustaining Forest-Based Livelihoods and Encouraging Community Dialogue and Reconciliation in the Casamance’

Evaluation Conducted By: Lamin Bajo, Forestry Department, The Gambia. Report findings were edited by Ansumana Sanneh, CU Casamance Programme Development Officer, and Tony Jansen, CU Country Director. The project under evaluation is ‘Rebuilding and Sustaining Forest-Based Livelihoods and Encouraging Community Dialogue and Reconciliation in the Casamance’ funded by the US Department of State Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations. The project involved supporting the establishment of 6 community-managed forests in the Casamance region of Senegal close to the Gambia border. The project was implemented by UK headquartered international NGO Concern Universal working with local Senegal based partner ASAPID (Association to Support to Peace and Development Initiatives). As the one-year project was coming to an end, Concern Universal requested an evaluation to assess the successes, failures and constraints of the project.

Page 2: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  2  of  27  

Background and methodology Terms of Reference The  main  objectives  of  this  evaluation  is  to  assess  the  one  year  project  led  by  ASAPID  with  the  main  purpose  of:  

1. Identifying  the  areas  of  achievements  2. Identifying  the  weaknesses  and  the  constraints  3. Identifying  the  possible  management  options  for  implementation  of  future  projects  

The  evaluator  was  asked  to  consider:  

• Comprehensive  &  practical  knowledge  of  member  communities  (participants)    • The  administrative  and  organizational  background  of  ASAPID  • The  communication  system  of  ASAPID  • Sustainability  of  information  within  member  communities  • Gender  mainstreaming  • The  ownership  rights  over  the  community  forest  by  member  communities.  • Capacity  building  of  ASAPID  and  member  communities  • Community  forest  assessment  • Peoples  participation  • External  collaboration  

Methodology The  field  work  of  the  evaluation  was  conducted  over  3  days  from  the  29th  April  2014.    This  evaluation  was  conducted  using  a  participatory  method  where  by  both  the  ASAPID  executive  and  members  and  community  members  (participants)  are  able  to  freely  put  forward  their  views  in  discussion  and  interviews.  The  process  was  facilitated  with  the  use  of  questionnaires/check  lists  designed  for  the  various  target  groups  (see  annex  5  &  6).  

During  the  evaluation  focus  group  discussion  participants  were  divided  into  four  groups:  female;  male;  youth  and  a  mixed  group.  Focus  group  discussions  were  held  in:  Diouloulou  at  the  ASAPID  office;  at  Kartack  Bantaba;  and  at  Dombondirr  village  Bantaba.  There  were  35  beneficiaries  present  in  each  group  discussion  except  for  the  mixed  group  that  had  45  members  (15  men,15  women  and  15  youth).  

A  field  assessment  was  made  of  the  6  community  forests  by  the  evaluator,  a  specialist  in  forestry,  in  order  to  identify  the  conditions  of  the  forest  including:  fertility;  regeneration  potential;  fire  damage  and  illegal  logging  if  any.  The  outcome  of  these  visits  was  to  design/recommend  possible  management  options  for  each  community  forest.  

Sampling Method A  purposeful  sampling  method  was  used  in  order  to  have  good  representation  from  the  various  community  forest  committees  and  the  communities  that  took  part  allowing  for  women,  men  and  youth  to  be  represented.  In  total  150  people  were  interviewed.    The  criteria  for  their  selection  was  based  on:  their  participation,  involvement  and  understanding  of  the  project  and  its  activities  in  those  communities  and  a  mix  of  gender  and  youth  and  adult  participants.  

Page 3: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  3  of  27  

Evaluation Findings Summary The  evaluation  found  the  following  achievements  have  been  registered  by  ASAPID  from  the  implementation  of  this  one  year  project.  The  capacity  of  ASAPID  and  its  member  communities  was  built  on  the  community  forest  management  concept  and  program,  market  analysis  and  development,  and  on  peace  building.  The  28  villages  that  are  part  of  the  community  forest  project  feel  they  are  more  united  to  advocate  for  peace  in  the  region.  It  is  evident  that  court  cases  and  activities  by  the  rebels  have  dropped  significantly  and  this  project  has  made  a  positive  contribution  to  that  wider  change.  

The Key Objectives Of The Project • Objective  1:  Establish  6  community–financed  and  managed  protected  forest  areas  and  equip  

communities  to  protect  them.  • Objective  2:    Improve  economic  opportunities  that  the  forest  can  provide  for  the  population  of  

approximately  28  villages.  • Objective  3:  Position  ASAPID  to  take  a  more  significant  role  in  the  development  of  future  

community  building  projects  

The  results  from  the  evaluation  are  presented  under  the  headings  of  these  3  objectives.    

Objective 1: Establish 6 community-financed and managed protected forest areas and equip communities to protect them Six  community  forests  have  been  established  and  are  under  protection  and  management  by  the  local  communities.  The  forest  areas  were  surveyed  and  the  final  maps  will  be  printed  shortly.  Two  more  communities  have  shown  their  interest  in  the  program  and  are  now  also  working  with  ASAPID  to  establish  community  forests.  Communities  have  set  by-­‐laws  binding  the  protection  and  rational  utilization  of  the  forest  products.  The  village  heads  have  signed  agreements  that  areas  identified  will  be  used  as  community  forest  and  the  agreements  have  been  approved  by  the  local  authorities.  The  community  forests  are  functioning,  as  evidenced  by,  for  example:  annual  tree  planting  activity  is  conducted  in  all  the  member  community  forests  using  their  indigenous  species  (carried  out  by  the  communities  themselves  with  high  involvement  of  youth  and  women)  and  communities  are  participating  in  fire  control  and  patrolling  the  forest  to  prevent  illegal  logging  and  poaching.  

Objective 2: improve the economic opportunities that the forest can provide for the population of 28 villages  Joint  collection  and  marketing  of  forest  products  to  generate  income  for  the  entire  communities  is  underway  in  the  28  villages  that  are  part  of  the  community  forest  program.  This  is  mostly  done  by  women  and  youth.  The  income  generated  will  pass  through  the  community  forest  committees  and  is  being  documented.  The  six  communities  combined  together  have  to  date  realized  a  modest  sum  of  110,000  CFA  ($230)  as  part  of  the  proceeds  from  the  sales  of  sustainably  harvested  forest  products.  

Objective 3: Position ASAPID to take a more significant role in the development of future community projects There  has  been  a  great  improvement  on  the  ASAPID  administrative  system  and  the  office  is  better  equipped  and  more  functional  with  5  staff  who  work  on  a  full  time  basis.  Also  the  association’s  communication  system  is  improved,  although  not  yet  adequate  as  the  internet  service  is  not  available  which  would  help  the  communication  and  sharing  of  information  with  donors  and  partners.    

Page 4: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  4  of  27  

DETAILED FINDINGS

Objective 1: Establish 6 community–financed and managed protected forest areas and equip communities to protect them.

New community protected forests established The  project  aimed  to  establish  six  new  community  forests  (CF)  in  addition  to  the  pilot  CF  (KOUDIOUBE).  The  result  achieved  is  the  establishment  of  eight  community  forests  protecting  786  hectares  of  forest  under  the  management  of  their  traditional  community  users.  The  eight  forests  are:    SALETTY  /  KOBA  SALETTY;  KATACK;  KATABA1;  KULANJANG;  BANGIKAK;  KABARJO;  DOMBONDIR  and  TAMBA  KUNDA.  This  includes  the  6  planned  new  CFs  and  two  additional  CFs  (SALETTY  &  BANGIKAK)  which  ASAPID  have  supported  in  some  activities  due  to  the  motivation  of  these  communities.  These  community  forests  have  been  demarcated  ,  with  final  mapping  to  be  completed  in  the  final  month  of  the  project.  The  forest  committees  have  set  by-­‐laws  binding  the  protection  and  utilization  of  forest  resources.  ASAPID  have  succeeded  in  ensuring  that  six  of  the  eight  community  forests  are  legally  registered  (as  per  the  objectives  of  the  project).  These  are  Kataba1,  Kulanjang,  kabajo,  Katak,  Dombondirr  and  Tamba  Kunda.  

 

 

 

Page 5: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  5  of  27  

Technical Forest Assessment The  table  below  gives  an  insight  of  each  community  forests’  area,  physical  structure,  legal  protection  status  in  relation  to  ASAPID  efforts  under  this  project  and  nature  of  forest  the  soil.  

COMMUNITY  FOREST  NAME  

APROXIMATE  AREA  (ha.)  (*figures  updated  as  per  official  mapping)  

LEGAL  REGISTRATION  STATUS  

TOPOGRAPHY   DENSITY   SOIL  CONDITION  

 

KATABA  1   26   Registered   Gently  sloping  from  the  east  towards  the  river.  

medium   Fertile  

KULANJANG   45   Registered   Flat   Sparse  open  at  the  west  

Fertile  

KABAJO   52   Registered   Very  gently  sloping  to  the  north  from  the  south  

Generally  medium  

Fertile  

KATAK   30   Registered   Generally  gently  sloping  from  east  to  west.  

Highly  dense  at  the  west  and  medium  at  the  east.  

Very  fertile  

DOMBONDIR   30   Registered   Flat   Highly  dense  at  the  north  and  medium  at  the  south.  

Very  fertile  

TAMBA  KUNDA  

30   Registered   Flat   Generally  medium  

fertile  

SELLETY/KOBA  SELLETY  

85  (approx.)   New  not  registered  yet  

Flat     Mainly  sparse  to  medium  

Very  good  

BANDJIKAK   69  (approx.)   New  not  registered  yet  

Flat    medium   Fertile  

 

The  table  below  shows  the  detailed  description  of  each  community  forest  area  with  consideration  to  the  ability  of  the  forest  to  serve  ecological  purposes.    

NAME  COMMUNITY  FOREST  

FOREST  TYPES  

TYPE  ONE  (closed  forest)   TYPE  TWO  (open  forest)   TYPE  THREE  (trees  and  shrub  savanna)  

KATABA 1 Main species: jallo{khaya senegalenses},tengo {borasious Africana},bunking {bombax costatum} and keno {pterocarpus erinaceus}.

Canopy level: 2

Bush fire state: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: available

Erosion signs: visible

Main species:jallo{khaya senegalenses},tengo {borasious Africana},bunking {bombax costatum} and keno {pterocarpus erinaceus}.

Canopy level: 2

Bush fire state: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: available

Erosion signs: visible

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunking (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 3 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Page 6: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  6  of  27  

Management options: removal of dead woods and annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Management options: removal of dead woods and annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

KULANJANG Main species: jallo{khaya senegalenses},tengo {borasious Africana},bunking {bombax costatum} and keno {pterocarpus erinaceus}.

Canopy level: 2

Bush fire state: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: available

Erosion signs: visible

Management options: removal of dead woods and annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo{khaya senegalenses},tengo {borasious Africana},bunking {bombax costatum} and keno {pterocarpus erinaceus}.

Canopy level: 2

Bush fire state: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: available

Erosion signs: visible

Management options: removal of dead woods and annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo, tengo, folley, kaba, sotto (figus exprata), bunking and keno (pterocarpus erinaceous).

Canopy levels: 2.

Bush fire states: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species and removal of dead woods.

KABADJO Main species: jallo, tengo, folley, kaba, sotto (figus exprata), bunking and keno (pterocarpus erinaceous).

Canopy levels: 2.

Bush fire states: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species and removal of dead woods.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 3 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

SELLETY Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 3 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

KATAK Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses),

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses),

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses),

Page 7: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  7  of  27  

bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 3 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

DOMBONDIR Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 3 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 3 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species

TAMBA KUNDA Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 3 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

Main species: jallo (khaya senegalense), tengo (borasious Africanu), folley, (saba senegalinses), bunkung (Bombax costatum).

Canopy levels: 1 bush fire states: medium

Regeneration Potential: high because of there are enough of mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species.

BANDJIKAK Main species: jallo, tengo, folley, kaba, sotto (figus exprata), bunking and keno (pterocarpus erinaceous).

Canopy levels: 2.

Bush fire states: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Main species: jallo, tengo, folley, kaba, sotto (figus exprata), bunking and keno (pterocarpus erinaceous).

Canopy levels: 2.

Bush fire states: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Main species: jallo, tengo, folley, kaba, sotto (figus exprata), bunking and keno (pterocarpus erinaceous).

Canopy levels: 2.

Bush fire states: medium

Regeneration potential: high because there are enough mother trees to provide seeds for regeneration.

Dead woods: few.

Page 8: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  8  of  27  

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species and removal of dead woods.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species and removal of dead woods.

Erosion: signs invisible.

Management option: annual enrichment planting with indigenous species and removal of dead woods.

Forest Committee Formation: Six  new  community  forest  committees  were  formed  and  their  capacities  built  on  the  committee’s  and  individual  member’s  roles  and  responsibilities  to  ensure  proper  protection  and  management  of  the  forest  for  sustainability.  In  addition,  two  new  communities  have  acknowledged  their  interest  in  working  with  ASAPID,  and  have  formed  committees,  but  were  yet  to  be  registered.  

Sustainability of Community Protected Forests The  implementation  of  training  programs  by  ASAPID  is  to  offer  appropriate  and  on  the  ground  training  followed  by  routine  monitoring  support.  A  community  sensitization  and  community  based  institution  capacity  building  approach  is  used  by  ASAPID  to  ensure  learning  is  transferred  to  the  wider  communities  by  the  primary  beneficiaries.  The  training  of  community  forest  committees  on  the  Community  Forest  management  concept  aims  to  ensure  sustainability  of  both  the  environment  and  local  forest  cover  and  help  to  ensure  the  long-­‐term  income  and  food  security  for  the  beneficiaries,  while  on  peace  building  will  help  to  maintain  peace  and  tranquility  within  the  region,  according  to  interviewees.  In  addition  to  that  ASAPID  conducts  monthly  and  quarterly  meetings  with  its  member  communities  in  order  to  keep  information,  ideas  and  skills  current  in  peoples’  minds  at  all  time.  Furthermore  ASAPID  recently  took  part  in  the  annual  regional  and  trans-­‐boundary  congress  on  the  forest  and  the  environment.  

People’s Participation Prior  to  the  pilot  that  preceded  this  project,  men  and  youths  were  reported  by  the  community  and  ASAPID  to  contribute  very  little  towards  the  development  and  protection  of  forest  cover,  since  they  were  the  ones  directly  involved  in  forest  product  utilization  and  business  –  and  hence  forest  destruction.  In  those  days,  according  to  the  participants,  men  and  youths  were  the  ones  engaged  in  rebellion  activities  within  the  region  and  thus  they  decided  on  issues,  including  use  of  and  destruction  of  forests,  without  consulting  anyone  else  -­‐  as  they  took  all  powers  in  their  hands.  

Since  the  start  of  ASAPID’s  work  on  community  forest  management,  this  trend  has  changed.  The  awareness  created  has  changed  attitudes,  causing  men  and  women  to  take  part  in  protection  and  conservation  activities  led  by  ASAPID.  The  first  step  is  the  peace  building  mechanism  used  by  ASAPID  to  ensure  and  contribute  to  tranquility  within  the  region.  Also  ASAPID  have  improved  people’s  participation  and  interest  by  linking  traditional  norms  and  values  connected  to  the  protection  of  the  forest  –  e.g.  awareness  programs  in  communities  on  the  socio  cultural  importance  of  the  forest.  Furthermore,  ASAPID  have  enlightened  young  people  to  respect  their  elders  but  to  also  have  a  say  in  the  decision-­‐making.  ASAPID  have  generally  changed  the  attitude  of  men,  women  and  youths  towards  participation  in  forest  management.  This  is  a  quote  from  a  man  now  active  in  forest  management:  “I  was  lost  and  lacked  sympathy  but  thanks  to  ASAPID  I  want  to  join  others  to  develop  what  we  retarded:  our  forest  cover”.      

See  Annex  4  for  chart  showing  the  changes  in  peoples  participation  over  time  due  to  ASAPID  efforts.    

Page 9: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  9  of  27  

ASAPID  also  aimed  to  specifically  involve  the  Youth  Folk  in  the  Management  of  the  Forest  and  Forest  resources.  The  result  obtained  from  the  reviewing  session  and  from  focus  group  discussions  shows  that  youth  involvement  and  participation  have  improved  greatly  -­‐  they  form  about  70%  of  participants  in  activities  such  as  fire  fighting  and  control,  harvesting  and  collection  of  forest  produces  (fruits  and  nuts),  planting  and  patrolling  the  forest  areas  for  protection  against  illegal  exploitations.  

Gender Mainstreaming ASAPID  have  mainstreamed  gender  equity  through  a  high  level  of  training  and  participation  of  women  in  this  project.  Evidence  of  this  included:  

• Women  formed  the  majority  of  participants  at  meetings,    • Women  formed  the  majority  of  participants  at  community  forest  activities  such  as  tree  

planting  and  weeding.    • This  high  involvement  of  women  was,  according  to  the  participants  at  the  evaluation  session,  

due  to  women  handling  responsibilities  within  the  forest  committees  –  women  hold  key  positions  such  as  vice  chairperson,  treasurers,  organizers  and  auditors  as  intentionally  encouraged  by  ASAPID.  

• They  have  also  improved  women’s  participation  by  creating  understanding  in  men  that  women  cannot  be  left  behind  in  any  development  activities.    

Peace Building: The  implementation  of  the  project  occurred  during  a  period  when  the  fighting  between  the  MFDC  and  the  Senegalese  military  and  other  individual  communities  has  stopped.  The  result  obtained  from  the  group  discussions  was  that  the  project  has  contributed  greatly  towards  the  achievement  of  peace  and  tranquility  in  the  region.  Examples  of  how  the  project  has  contributed  to  peace  building:    

• There  are  now  28  villages  in  the  region  (members  of  the  community  forest  program)  with  the  common  goal  of  having  a  peaceful  and  stable  region  and  sustainable  management  of  forests.    

• The  exchange  visits  between  the  forest  committees  and  communities  and  the  festival  held  in  Koudioube  and  sensitizations  meetings  are  examples  of  project  activities  that  participants  referred  to  that  unite  them  in  having  the  same  goal.    

• Cattle  thieves  are  jointly  controlled  by  villages  in  the  same  area  using  the  structure  of  forest  monitoring  set  up  by  the  project.    

• The  number  of  court  cases  has  reduced  compared  to  the  pre-­‐project  era.  This  is  so  because  according  to  target  groups  during  discussions;  people  are  more  respectful  of  forest  and  other  resources  and  take  only  what  is  rightly  theirs,  and  offences  and  assaults  upon  others  have  reduced  significantly.  

Nonetheless,  some  people  mentioned  that  the  free  movement  of  people  and  goods  is  still  difficult  due  to  the  many  military  check  points.  

 

Page 10: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  10  of  27  

Objective 2: Improve economic opportunities that the forest can provide for the population of approximately 28 villages.

Training. Capacity  building  has  taken  place  at  two  levels.  Level  one  is  the  training  of  the  participants  in  beneficiary  communities  with  special  focus  on  community  forest  management,  gardening,  market  analysis  and  market  development  –  project  records  show  298  people  were  trained.  Level  two  is  the  training  of  ASAPID  members  on  bookkeeping,  accounting,  peace  building,  market  analysis,  market  development  and  forest  management.    

The  table  below  shows  the  various  training  programs  (extracted  from  ASAPID  and  CU  records)  on  capacities  of  ASAPID  and  member  communities  were  built.  (N.B.  These  may  include  some  training  undertaken  by  ASAPID  under  other  projects  as  the  distinction  is  not  clear  to  all  beneficiary  communities)    

Name  of  the  trainee  group  

Trained  on     Trained  by   Number  of  people  trained  

Remarks/recommendation   Verification  

ASAPID   Accounting  and  book  keeping  

Concern  universal  

15  people   Correct  recording  of  income  and  transparent  financial  transactions  in  place  

Workshop  report  

ASAPID   Peace  building   Concern  universal  

25  people   Peace  and  tranquility  in  place.  The  MFDC  and  other  rebel  factions  agreed  to  stop  fighting  one  another.  Court  cases  went  down  drastically  

Report  in  file  

Page 11: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  11  of  27  

Rational Exploitation Of Forest Resources: This  activity  was  targeted  at  member  communities  in  order  to  ensure  sustainability  of  the  forest  and  its  resources  (timber  and  non  timber  products).  This  has  been  achieved  through  awareness  creation  and  trainings.  Participants  report  (and  forest  visits  confirmed  through  observation)  that  people  are  now  involved  in  more  rational  and  collective  harvesting  of  forest  resources  particularly  fruits  and  nuts.  Many  are  now  collectively  sold  to  generate  income  for  the  communities.  For  proper  monitoring  and  revenue  control,  the  member  communities  have  in  place  a  system  of  documentation  of  the  revenue  gained  from  sales  of  forest  products  from  the  community  forest  and  this  is  managed  to  serve  the  purpose  of  the  forests  and  the  management  of  forest  resources.  

This  realization  of  income  for  joint/community  benefit  has  encouraged  youths  to  get  involved  in  community  forest  activity  implementation.  According  to  the  group  discussions,  youths  and  women  forms  the  majority  in  activities  such  as  planting,  weeding,  fruits  and  nut  collection  and  marketing  of  forest  products  collected.  

Community forests contribution to income generation Having  the  forest  has  had  important  impacts  on  the  community.  Participants  stated  on  many  occasions  that  community  forest  management  has  positively  contributed  to  their  income  generation  through:    

• the  joint  collaboration  of  women  in  the  collection  and  sales  of  forest  products.    • the  provision  of  their  basic  needs  such  as  fuel  wood,  fruits  and  nuts  as  food    • the  protective  services  the  forest  provides  such  as  wind  control,  erosion  control  and  the  

improvement  of  wildlife  habitat.    

Women  reported  their  involvement  in  the  following  income  generation  activities  through  their  work  with  ASAPID  on  the  project  (note  that  some  of  the  activities  mentioned  were  part  of  other  initiatives  of  ASAPID  working  with  CU  and  beneficiaries  were  not  always  clear  on  the  distinction  between  different  projects):  

• Kataba  1-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐palm  oil  production  and  gardening.  • Kulangjang-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐palm  oil  production,  soap  making  and  gardening.  • Sallety/kabasallety-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  soap  making  and  gardening.  • Tamba  kunda-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐soap  making,  tie  and  dye  and  gardening.  • Kabajo-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐gardening,  tie  and  dye  and  soap  making.  • Bangikak-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐marketing  of  forest  produce  (fruits  and  nuts),  soap  making  and  

gardening.  

Participants  from  member  committees  

Gardening   ASAPID   48  women   Organic  crop  production  is  on  going   Training  report  

Community  Forest  committees  

Community  Forest  (CF)  management  

ASAPID   120  people   Implementation  of  C  F  concepts  in  place.  The  number  of  CF  increased  from  one  to  six  

Training  report  

Women  groups  

Forest  products  market,  analysis  and  development.  

KOMFORA  and  ASAPID  

90  women   Collective  realization  of  income  from  sales  of  forest  products  

Training  report  

Page 12: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  12  of  27  

• Katak-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐collective  marketing  of  forest  produce  (fruits  and  nuts),  palm  oil  production  and  soap  making.  

• Dombondirr-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐marketing  of  forest  produce  (fruits  and  nuts)  palm  oil  production  and  soap  making.      

Page 13: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  13  of  27  

 

Objective 3: Position ASAPID to take a more significant role in the development of future community building projects

ASAPID Organisational Capacity. The  project  supported  ASAPID  to  have  an  office  established  in  Diouloulou  for  the  first  time  and  various  capacity  building  training  and  mentoring  was  conducted  for  the  staff,  board  members  and  members  with  the  aim  of  strengthening  the  organization.  The  evaluation  found  this  office  equipped  with  furniture,  a  desktop  computer  and  printers  and  there  are  now  five  permanent  staff  attached  to  the  office.  The  evaluators  observations  of  ASAPID  and  its  current  organizational  status  are  as  follows:    

ASAPID  have  expanded  their  work  with  a  range  of  funding  agencies  such  as  AJIOUS  (US)  fund,  ANCS,  FAO,  as  well  as  the  US  state  department  with  Concern  Universal.    This  appears  a  strength  as  they  are  not  totally  dependent  on  the  U.S.  State  Department  support.  Most  importantly  ASAPID  have  been  working  closely  with  Concern  Universal  for  many  years.  

ASAPID  has  a  well  organized  administrative  structure  (see  annex  3  for  organizational  diagram).  This  shows  that  decisions  and  activities  are  not  led  by  only  individual.  The  members  of  the  executive  are  well  represented  by  both  men  and  women  from  the  registered  member  communities.  From  discussion  during  the  analysis,  it  was  found  that  the  first  secretary,  the  first  treasurer,  the  first  organizer  and  the  vice  chairperson  are  all  women  –  a  positive  gender  representation  for  the  organization  (50%  female).  The  executive  members  reported  to  each  know  what  other  members  are  undertaking.  This  showed  signs  of  transparency  existing  within  the  association.  

 

 

Page 14: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  14  of  27  

ASAPID Communication System Communication  with  the  community  is  one  of  the  most  important  aspects  of  a  project  that  relies  on  community  mobilization  to  increase  support  for  sustainable  forest  management.  Without  an  excellent  communication  system,  it  is  difficult  to  gather  and  disseminate  information,  showcase  new  ideas,  skills  and  attract  external  interest  groups.  

ASAPID  reported  the  use  of  the  following  communication  strategies  to  let  its  members,  working  groups  and  others  outside  community  members  learn  about  them,  their  achievement  and  constraints:  

• Traditional  means  i.e.  the  use  of  women  group  called  Kanyeleng.  • Telephone  /  mobile  • Letters    • Field  visits  –  including  community  meetings  and  face  to  face  discussion  

For  donor  communication  of  results  and  replication,  ASAPID  usually  presents  activity  reports,  and  monthly  and  quarterly  reports  that  are  communicated  to  Concern  Universal  who  in  turn  reports  to  the  donor.    

External Collaboration This  is  another  very  important  aspect  of  a  successful  program  or  project.  The  importance  of  external  collaboration  in  a  development  project  includes  the  provision  of  support  in  services,  advices,  skills  provision  and  funding.  ASAPID,  have  proven  to  be  working  hand  In  hand  with  other  associations,  departments  and  groups  etc.  on  areas  like  capacity  building,  awareness  creation,  peace  building  and  implementation  of  activities.  The  following  were  ASAPID’s  collaborators  during  this  project  period:  

• Concern  universal-­‐  on  environmental  protection,  activity  implementation  and  peace  building.  • AJWS  (US  fund)-­‐  on  environmental  protection  and  horticulture.  • ANCS  (HIV&  AIDS  and  MALARIA)-­‐  On  environmental  and  livelihood  development.  • KOMOFORA  -­‐  on  sustainable  forest  management.  • The  AREA  COUNCIL  and  the  REGIONAL  AUTHORITIES  -­‐  On  awareness  creation.  

Capacity Building: This  activity  was  targeted  for  ASAPID  executive  and  its  member  communities.  This  is  an  essential  plan  and  the  execution  of  it  has  greatly  improved  the  administrative  and  communication  system  of  ASAPID  and  its  member  communities.  It  has  also  improved  their  knowledge  and  practical  skills  when  it  comes  to  issues  relating  to  the  project  objectives  such  as  land  degradation  and  sustainable  forest  management,  peace  building  etc.  According  to  the  ASAPID  executive,  they  now  have  an  office  that  is  equipped  with  desktop  computer  set,  printer  and  scanner  and  they  have  telephone  lines  that  help  them  to  reach  their  members  and  can  also  help  outsiders  to  reach  them  at  all  times.  

According  to  the  member  communities  during  the  group  discussions,  they  are  within  ASAPID  and  the  office  is  easily  accessible  by  them  in  addition  to  each  community  having  a  representative  in  ASAPID  which  makes  them  always  up  to  date  with  ASAPID,  its  activities,  programs  and  new  issues  (see  annex  1  &  2  for  a  detailed  matrix  showing  communities  understanding  and  knowledge  gained  on  the  projects’  objectives  and  related  areas  of  environment  and  livelihood  development).  

 

Page 15: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  15  of  27  

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Conduct  more  media  (radio  and  television)  programs  to  help  create  awareness  in  many  people  about  ASAPID’s  programs  and  area  of  operation  –  ensuring  a  wider  spread  of  demand  by  communities  to  protect  their  own  forests  with  legal  backing/registration.  

2. Annual  field  visit  between  community  forests  by  ASAPID  and  members  in  order  to  exchange  ideas  and  motivate  each  other.  

3. Introduction  of  an  annual  forest  festival  with  conservation  related  theme  whereby  cultural/  traditional  events  are  used  to  discuss  environmental  issues  with  the  larger  population.    

4. ASAPID  to  develop  a  gender  equity  policy  and  training  manual  so  that  the  benefits  of  gender  equity  reach  all  member  communities.    

5. ASAPID  to  conduct  further  stakeholder  awareness  training  on  environment  and  livelihood  development  issues.    

6. ASAPID  to  ensure  the  further  training  of  its  member  communities  and  their  various  community  forest  committees  on  practical  and  theoretical  aspects  of  sustainable  forest  management  as  well  as  on  other  areas  that  will  provide  skills  to  generate  income.  

7. Effort  should  be  made  by  both  ASAPID,  communities  and  donors  to  ensure  the  annual  enrichment  tree-­‐planting  in  community  forests  is  continued  

Follow up projects In  the  light  of  this  assessment,  the  following  options  can  be  used  by  ASAPID  and  its  members  to  take  the  achievements  of  this  project  to  the  next  level:  

• Continuous  and  widening  scale  of  sensitization  • Continued  Capacity  building  of  ASAPID  and  its  members  on  the  principle  features  of  the  CF  

concept,  and  harvesting,  processing  and  sales  of  forest  produces  (fruits  and  nuts  etc).  • Capacity  building  of  small  scale  entrepreneurs  who  trade  and  add  value  to  forest  products    • Capacity  building  of  youths  on  various  skills  that  can  be  use  to  generate  income  • Introduction  of  eco-­‐tourism  program  • Strengthening  of  the  forest  committees  on  planning,  and  implementation  of  planned  activities  

as  well  as  on  control  and  protection  mechanisms  • Annual  tree  planting  in  CF  areas  • Continued  establishment  of  fire  breaks  around  the  CFs  to  protect  against  fires  • Training  and  establishment  of  village  tree  nurseries  to  ensure  timely  supply  of  planting  stocks    • Introduction  of  environmental  lessons  at  schools    • Bee  keeping  training  and  introduction  into  CFs  • Plant  salt  resistant  species  in  salt  intruded  areas  • Introduction  of  the  new  cooking  stoves  to  minimize  the  consumption  of  fuel  wood  /  charcoal  • Mangroves  and  coast  line  protection  and  management  would  be  a  logical  extension  to  the  CF    • Advocate  for  organic  food  production  and  train  communities  on  compost  making  and  provision  

of  tools  for  forest  and  agricultural  development  activities.  • Strengthen  the  ties  with  collaborators  and  link  with  more  external  interest  groups.  

 

Page 16: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  16  of  27  

CONLUSION Although  the  region’s  forests  and  coastlines  are  impacted  by  human  activities,  most  of  it  is  still  ecologically  intact.  However,  due  to  the  fact  that  the  region  is  attracting  people  and  competition  is  increasing  over  farmlands  and  usable  forest  and  coastal  resources,  making  an  efficient  land  use  planning  essential.  

The  first  step  in  this  direction  is  the  advocacy  of  peace  building,  awareness  creation,  capacity  building  and  motivation  provided  by  ASAPID  which  has  helped  a  lot  in  encouraging  people  to  be  involved  and  take  part  in  sustainable  development  activities.  Considering  the  number  of  participating  communities  and  activities  that  were  successfully  conducted  in  just  a  one  year  project  period,  it  is  evident  that  success  has  been  marked  for  this  ASAPID/Concern  Universal  (US  Department  of  State  funded)  project.  

From  the  results  of  the  analysis  according  to  the  team  of  evaluators,  it  has  been  proved  that  ASAPID  have  gained  success  in  the  implementation  of  planned  activities  during  this  one  year  project  despite  the  short  length  of  project  period.  Therefore  the  team  of  evaluators  did  recommend  for  the  extension  of  or  a  follow  on  to  this  project  in  order  to  ensure  sustainable  environment  and  livelihood  development  even  well  after  the  project  and  to  a  wider  scale  of  beneficiary  communities  in  the  region.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 17: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  17  of  27  

Annex 1 THE  COMPREHENSIVE  KNOWLEDGE  OF  PARTICIPANTS  ON  THE  PROJECT  OBJECTIVE  AND  RELATED  AREAS  OF  LIVELIHOOD  DEVELOPMENT:  

The  table  below  shows  the  level  of  understanding  of  participants  (communities)  on  the  project  objectives  and  other  related  areas  for  livelihood  development.  As  can  be  seen  below  participants’  levels  of  comprehension  are  rated  as  HIGH,  MEDIUM  or  LOW  during  the  group  discussions.  

HIGH  means  a  particular  community  has  an  excellent  understanding  on  the  project  objectives  and  related  areas  of  livelihood  development.  MEDIUM  means  that  a  community  has  a  good  understanding  on  the  project  objectives  while  LOW  indicates  a  poor  comprehensive  knowledge  on  the  project  objective  and  related  areas  of  livelihood  development.  

      THEMETIC  FOCAL  AREAS      

PARTICIPANTS    

LAND  DEGRADATION  &  SUSTAINABLE  FOREST  MGMT.  MANAGEMENT    

BIO  DIVERSITY  &  CLIMATE  CHANGE  

INTERNATIONAL  WATERS  

CHEMICALS  (POPS).  

PEACE  AND  STABILITY  

CAPACITY  BUILDING.  

KATABA  1   High  

 

medium   Low   high   high   high  

KULANJANG     High  

 

high   medium   high   high   high  

TAMBA  KUNDA  

high   medium   medium   medium   high   high  

SELLETY/KOBA  SELLETY  

high   high   medium   medium   high   high  

KABAJO   High  

 

high   medium   high   high   high  

BANGIKAK   High  

 

medium   Low   high   high   high  

KATAK   High  

 

medium   Low   medium   high   high  

DOMBONDIR   High  

 

medium   medium   medium   high   high  

 

 

 

Page 18: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  18  of  27  

Annex 2

 

ASSESSMENT  OF  THE  PRACTICAL  KNOWLEDGE  OF  PARTICIPANTS  (COMMUNITIES)  ON  ASAPIDS’  FOCAL  AREAS  AND  RELATED  AREAS  FOR  LIVELIHOOD  DEVELOPMENT:  

The  table  below  shows  the  participants’  practical  knowledge  gained  on  ASAPIDs’  focal  areas  and  related  areas  for  livelihood  development.  

Thematic focal areas of ASAPID

PARTICIPANTS LAND DEGRADATION & SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT.

BIO DIVERSITY & CLIMATE CHANGE

INTERNATIONAL WATERS

CHEMICALS PEACE AND STABILITY

CAPACITY BUILDING

KATABA 1 We stop illegal felling of trees.

We agree to manage our own CF reserve.

We put a prohibition on bush fires.

We plant trees in the CF annually.

We put in place a fire protection mechanism i.e. the creation of access roads.

No felling.

We don’t allow fire in the forest.

Hunting is limited.

We take part in mangrove plantings to protect the coast line.

We use only organic manures for our plants and crops.

We will not allow disposals of poisonous materials in our surroundings.

War kills and displaces people so we contribute in maintaining peace in the region.

We know that if no trees there won’t be any life and if no life there will be no trees.

We can protect our forest from fires.

We can make compost manures.

To succeed we want to have more training.

KULANJANG No fires in the CF allowed.

Felling of trees not allowed.

Grazing areas set aside.

We constantly patrol our forest.

We have a CF reserve.

We stop the use of fires in forest areas to reduce carbon emission.

No felling of trees in the forest areas to retain the carbon sink.

We protect the fauna by conserving their habitat.

We are always ready to protect the coast lines.

We plant mangroves.

We now use organic manures for our crops and plants.

We try to dispose the poisonous substances and containers.

We want no more fights.

Without peace we will not live a stable life.

Instability destroyed our forest cover.

Our women KAFOs can process fruits from the forest in to oils and soaps e.g. palm oils.

We have good knowledge in gardening.

TAMBA KUNDA

Deliberate cutting of trees for individual benefits destroyed our forest.

Now We don’t allow illegal felling of tree.

Fire is not allowed in forest

We protect and sustainably manage our own cf.

We protect the lives in the forest.

No disposal of contaminants in the river.

No use of unclassified fishing nets.

We can make compost manures and we use only that for our crops and plants.

No living is satisfactory without peace.

We will contribute in all ways to maintain peace in the region.

There is always a low lifespan

Learning from trainings helps us to be able to make organic compost manures for our crops.

Know how to manage our forest.

Know how to

Page 19: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  19  of  27  

areas.

We manage our own cf.

without peace. maintain peace.

We Know good agricultural and horticultural practices.

SELLETY / KOBA SELLETY

We know that our forest areas are degrading.

We know forest degradation courses land degradation.

Now we don’t allow felling of live trees.

No use of fire in forest areas.

We apply the CF concept and we now have a cf.

We know that when forests are degraded, the animals that lives there will migrate

So we protect the forest and rehabilitate open areas by planting trees.

Bush fire is prohibited.

We will now not allow the disposal of waste in the rivers.

We will participate in mangrove planting for coast line improvement and protection.

We know that the unstable climatic change is course by the degradation of the environment basically the forest.

We protect our forest from destruction.

We know that when people are not stable in thought and basic needs unavailable, there can never be productivity thus livelihood is left stagnant. We will always take part in peace making

We say no training no skills.

From training we can now make compost manure, soaps, cooking palm oils and tie and dye, gardening. we Can manage our own CF

KABAJO We plant trees.

We avoid bush fires.

We know how to control minor gulley erosions.

We understand the CF concept and we have a CF.

We preserve the habitats by conserving the forest in that we preserve the lives within.

We maintain and improve the forest cover to reduce the risk of heat and storms.

Rivers and water ways should be protected from pollution and contamination

Illegal fishing trolleys should be controlled.

We don’t want to use chemical fertilizers.

We use organic manures.

We know how to properly dispose of chemical substances and containers.

We know peace is the main means of social, Agricultural, economic and livelihood development.

We obtain skills in gardening, making manures, soap making and tie and dye.

BANGIKAK We protect our forest (CF).

We plant trees.

We avoid bush fires.

Illegal felling of life trees prohibited.

We have a forest where animals live. Hunting

Is minimal.

We Stop bad fishing practices and

Protect the coast lines.

Chemicals are dangerous. We use only organic manures for our crops and plants.

Proper disposal of chemicalised materials is important.

Without peace we cannot live a normal life.

Without peace we will be retarded in all aspects of development.

Trainings provide us with skills such as compost making, gardening, forest management and soap making.

Page 20: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  20  of  27  

KATAK No tree felling for individual use.

We understand the CF concept.

We protect our forest from fires.

We plant trees.

No un authorized killing of plants and animals.

Rivers should not be polluted.

Illegal fishing materials can be monitored and controlled.

Organic manure is good and we use it on our crops and plants.

We know peace is the only way to successful development .we will always take part in peace maintaining.

We can collectively harvest fruits and dead wood from the forest and sell it for income.

We on make manure.

We can make soaps.

DOMBONDIR We know how to implement the CF concept.

We put aside a forest area as cf.

We protect the forest from fire and un notified felling.

We campaign against fires.

We plant trees and hunting is minimal.

Illegal fishing materials can be controlled by us.

We can monitor the disposal of waste in the rivers.

We plant mangroves to rehabilitate the coast lines.

We now use more of the organic manures than the chemical fertilizer.

We now know that peace and tranquility is the first step of livelihood development and we can and will at all times try to maintain peace in the region.

We can now realize collective income from the sales of forest produces.

We can process fruit of the forest in to products that can generate more income.

 

The  table  above  shows  that  the  participants  (communities)  have  a  very  good  practical  knowledge  on  the  focal  areas  of  ASAPID  and  other  related  areas  of  livelihood  development  example  the  participants  can  make  things  on  their  own  such  as  compost,  tie  and  dye,  soaps  and  detergents  etc.  implement  programs  such  as  community  forest  management,  developed  strategies  such  as  on  marketing  of  forest  of  forest  produces  etc.  However,  it  is  important  to  improve  the  practical  knowledge  of  participants  on  those  thematic  focal  areas.  The  result  obtained  shows  that  the  participant  communities  have  acquired  a  lot  of  comprehensive  knowledge  on  the  thematic  focal  areas  mentioned,  example  they  know  that  land  degradation  is  mainly  caused  by  the  direct  and  indirect  involvement  of  people  in  the  uncontrolled  clearing  of  lands  for  mainly  income  generation  and  they  also  know  that  the  only  solution  to  land  degradation  is  the  sustainable  management  of  the  forest  cover  which  can  only  be  achieved  through  the  involvement  of  the  people  who  live  by  the  forest.  They  also  know  that,  without  peace  there  will  be  no  development  neither  involvement  of  the  people  etc.  Nonetheless  there  are  still  gaps  for  more  sensitization  on  areas  where  the  participants  have  medium  or  low  level  of  understanding.    

 

Page 21: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  21  of  27  

Annex 3  

ADMINISTRATIVE  AND  ORGANIZATIONAL  BACKGROUND  OF  ASAPID  

 

President/  chairman  

 

 

Vice  chair  person   Vice  chair  person  

         

   

 Secretary                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           sec.  

 

                 

 

Treasurer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Treasurer  

                 

                 

 

Auditor                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Auditor  

 

 

   Organizer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Organizer    

 

As  can  be  seen  above,  ASAPID  is  having  a  well  organized  administrative  background.  This  shows  that  decision  and  activities  are  not  led  by  one  individual.  The  members  of  the  executive  are  well  represented  by  both  men  and  women  from  the  registered  member  communities.  From  discussions  during  the  analysis,  it  was  found  out  that  the  first  secretary,  the  first  treasurer,  the  first  organizer  and  the  vice  chair  person  are  all  women.  This  totals  to  50%  of  the  total  executive  committee  members  with  each  one  knowing  what  the  other  is  up  to.  These  also  show  signs  of  transparency  existing  within  the  association.    

   

Page 22: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  22  of  27  

Annex 4 The  chart  below  shows  how  peoples’  participation  improved  over  time  due  to  ASAPIDS’  effort.  

 

  WOMEN   men  

  YOUTH  

From  the  graph  above  the  years  are  defined  on  the  horizontal  axis.  Colors  are  used  to  distinguish  men,  women  and  youths.  On  the  left  hand  side  marked  from  0  to  5  indicates  the  different  levels  of  participation  of  the  various  groups.  0  to  1  means  poor  level  of  participation,  1  to  2  means  fair  participation,  2  to  3  means  good,  3  to  4  means  very  good  while  4  to  5  means  an  excellent  level  of  participation.  As  can  be  seen  above,  the  participation  of  women  and  youth  was  low  in  the  first  two  years  before  the  coming  of  ASAPID  while  in  that  era  men  participation  was  high  then.  This  is  because  men  were  leading  in  all  decision  making  as  they  were  the  ones  involved  in  the  rebellion  thus  people  were  afraid  to  voice  out  their  views  and  concerns.  With  this  fear  of  their  lives  and  forceful  participation,  women  and  youth  decided  to  stay  out  of  men  led  activities.  As  the  rebellion  calms  down,  as  seen  above  men  participation  lowers  while  that  of  women  and  youth  accelerated  which  is  achieved  through  the  involvement  of  ASAPID  in  sensitization  and  awareness  creation  within  the  region.  Nonetheless  recently  it  is  realized  that  men  participation  is  rising  now  but  at  a  low  pace.  

 

 

   

0  

1  

2  

3  

4  

5  

6  

2011   2012   2013   2014  

Page 23: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  23  of  27  

 

Annex 5

QUESTIONERS  FOR  THE  TARGET  GROUP  ASSESSMENT  

NAME    OF  TARGET  GROUP                                                                                            NUMBER  OF  PARTICIPANTS           DATE    

Please  you  are  urged  to  answer  the  following  questions  appropriately  by  ticking  the  right  answer  or  by  explaining  in  detail  where  necessary.  

1. What  is  an  environment?  

 

2. What  do  you  understand  about  land  degradation?  

 

3. What  does  sustainable  forest  management  means  to  you?  

 

4. What  other  components  of  the  environment  do  you  know?  Please  state  and  elaborate  on  them.  

 

5. What  is  a  forest  and  state  some  of  its  importance  to  you?  

 

6. Did  you  have  a  community  forest  at  your  village      yes.                      No.    

 

7. If  no  state  why.  

 

8. If  yes  since  when  did  you  start  implementing  the  idea/  concept.  

 

9. Did  you  have  a  special  body  representing  your  village  in  the  management  of  the  cf.  yes            no.    

 

10. Please  explain  what  you  know  about  ASAPID  and  their  area  of  operation.  

 

11. When  and  why  did  you  register  with  ASAPID?  

 

12. What  where  the  problems  faced  by  your  forest  before  the  coming  of  ASAPID?  

 

13. What  is  the  difference  in  the  condition  of  the  forests  today?  

Page 24: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  24  of  27  

 14. State  and  explain  the  most  important  effort  put  on  by  ASAPID  to  ensure  the  protection  and  

management  of  the  forest  cover.      

15. Name  some  of  the  activities  organized  by  ASAPID  with  its  member  communities.  

 

16. Are  participants  well  represented  and  gender  balance  during  community  forest  activities?  

 

17. If  no  state  who  are  less  represented  and  why.  

 

18. Did  ASAPID  focus  only  on  sustainable  forest  management?  Yes.                  no.    

 

19. If  no  what  are  the  other  areas  of  ASAPIDS’  focus.  

 

20. What  are  your  plans  to  protect  the  forest  from  fires?  

 

21. What  are  some  of  the  activities  that  ASAPID  did  in  its  member  communities  in  order  to  motivate  them?  

 

22. What  are  the  other  bodies,  groups  or  agencies  etc.  that  works  with  ASAPID  and  on  which  area.    

 

23. What  are  some  of  the  practical  knowledge  you  gain  from  your  understanding  about  the  focal  areas  of  ASAPID.  

 

 

24. Have  you  ever  get  training  from  ASAPID  or  through  ASAPID?  Yes.              No.    

 

25. If  yes  state  on  what?  

 

26. Does  the  training  benefit  you  and  how?  

 

Page 25: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  25  of  27  

27. How  many  people  do  you  think  get  training  from  ASAPID?  

 

28. Are  there  side  projects  led  by  women  and  or  youths?  Yes.            No.  

 

29. If  yes  name  them  and  state  their  focus  areas.  

 

30. What  is  the  status  of  peace  in  this  region  before  the  coming  of  ASAPID?  

 

31. What  is  the  status  of  peace  in  the  region  now?    

 

32. What  is  the  effort  made  y  ASAPID  to  ensure  the  changes  in  the  status  of  peace?  

 

33. Which  group  of  people  participate  in  forest  activities  before  the  coming  of  ASAPID  and  why.  

 

34. Which  group  of  people  is  highly  participating  now  and  why?  

 

 

35. What  do  you  think  brought  about  the  difference  in  the  levels  of  participation?  

 

36. What  do  you  think  should  be  done  by  ASAPID  to  in  order  to  gain  the  full  participation  of  both  sexes?  

 

 

 

 

Page 26: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  26  of  27  

Annex 6 ASAPID  ASSESSMENT  QUESTIONS  

 

Tick  the  appropriate  answer  and  explain  where  necessary.  

1. Please  explain  what  ASAPID  stands  for.  

 

2. Do  you  think  ASAPIDS’  organizational  structure  is  well  represented  and  balanced?  Yes.          No.    

 

3. If  yes  state  the  positions  led  by  women.  

 

4. If  no  state  why.  

 

5. Does  the  ASAPID  executive  include  members  from  the  local  authorities?  Yes.            No.    

 

6. If  no  state  why  

 

7. Name  some  important  initiations  of  ASAPID  

 

8. Name  the  important  collaborators  of  ASAPID  and  their  focus  areas.  

 

9. What  are  ASAPIDS’  main  objectives?  

 

10. Do  you  think  ASAPID  have  achieved  its  goal?  Yes.              No.    

 

11. If  no  state  why  12. How  often  did  ASAPID  organize  meetings?  

 

13. Was  ASAPID  able  to  train  its  member  communities?  Yes.                No.    

 

14. If  no  state  why  

Page 27: Concern universal casamance forest project final evaluation

Page  27  of  27  

 

15. If  yes  state  on  which  areas  

 

16. Are  all  your  planned  activities  achieved?  Yes.            No.    

 

17. If  no  state  why  

 

18. What  are  some  of  ASAPIDS’  activities  other  than  community  forest  management?  

 

19. State  some  of  the  most  important  achievements  of  ASAPID.  

 

20. What  will  you  like  your  next  project  to  look  like?  

 

21. How  do  you  communicate  with  your  member  communities  and  the  outside  world?        

22. How  would  you  like  the  communication  system  to  be  improved  in  the  future?