Upload
annabella-benson
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Concrete Codes and Standards
for Nuclear Power Plants (CTG)
Chiara Ferraris, NISTChairperson
CTGConcrete Codes and Standards for NPP • Created December 2009• Meetings:
– Monthly conference calls– in person (March 23, 2010) at the ACI
convention in Chicago• Final Draft report on NESCC
website: – 6 ballots to finalize the report– Request specific comments from NESCC
Membership - reviewers• 37 members from : ACI, AISC, Amec,
AmerenUE Callaway Nuclear Plant, AREVA, ASME, ASTM, BASF, Bechtel Power, Carrasquillo Associates, Commision Nacional de Seguridad Nuclear, DOE, Dominion Virginia Power, Duke Energy, EPRI, Exelon, FMC Lithium Division, ICA Fluor, INL, J.D. Stevenson, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NCMA, NFPA, NIST, Purdue Univ., Sargent & Lundy, Savannah River Remediation, Southern Company, Unistar, University of Kansas, US-NRC, Westinghouse
• 34 reviewers from industry, government and SDOs
Scope
• Establish coordination and consistency of safety and non-safety related concrete requirements
• Identify new design requirements for safety related concrete components, and develop a plan to incorporate these new requirements into codes and standards.
• Identify and review all U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory documents related to concrete for nuclear power plant
Objectives • Objective 1: Review NRC documents
– Documents considered: Mattson report, NRC NUREG CR 5973, and NRC-regulatory documents
– Detailed analysis of the gaps in the concrete standards, specification, and codes for all SDO’s.
• Objective 2: Categorize and Identify– Discussion of codes and standards– A list of issues and recommendations
• Objective 3-4: Identify research needs– list of potential areas where research might
improve or facilitate the construction
Report Table of content
1. Introduction2. Objectives overview3. Discussion of Standards
Developing Organizations (SDO) and relevant documents
4. Issues unrelated to SDOs5. Research Needs6. Summary
Goal 2-3: SDO examined• ACI – Amer. Concrete Institute
• AISC – Amer. Inst. of Steel Construction
• ASME – Amer. Soc. of Mechanical Engineers
• ANSI – Amer. National Standards Institute
• ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers
• EPRI - Electric Power Research Institute• NEI - Nuclear Energy Institute
• NFPA - National Fire Protection Association• Foreign standards and code – attempt
SDOs Related issues• Recommendation to revise not recently
(more than 10 yrs) updated documents• List of items that should be addressed
in otherwise updated documents. – Each recommendation was structured:
• Title• a) Status today• b) What needs to be changed for application to
a nuclear power plant?• c) Why does it need to be changed? Provide a
reference or example
Main issues uncovered
• ACI:– Specific recommendations for 318, 349
& 359– Update some related ACI documents,
i.e., related to Heavyweight concrete– Nuclear inspector certification program
• AISC/ACI: modular construction• Coordination of ACI/ASME
Coordination DOE, NRC, SDOs
• NRC and DOE need to review any new version of SDOs documents before they are accepted for use in NPP
• Expedite NRC and DOE review of the most used codes and standards
• Resolve construction requirements in conflict with NRC current technical requirements.
• Better procedure for NRC to adopt SDOs documents
Goal 2-3:Issues unrelated to SDOs
4.1 Materials4.2. Implement new, mature
technologies4.3. Foreign standards and Codes
Materials• Material selection for concrete
mixture designs needs: – to ensure conformity to current standards
and codes – sufficient material supply is locally
available– commercially available concrete batch
mix materials, with adequate records – enable assured concrete service life for
over 60 – 75 years.
Issues to be considered
• Supplementary cementitious material (SCM) usage should be encouraged
• Aggregate sources need to be tested, e.g. ASR
• High density aggregates characterization
• Cement characterization, i.e. SCM interaction
Implement mature technologies
• Self consolidating concrete (SCC). There are no references to SCC in any of the NRC documents.
• Procedure for introduction of new technology in the nuclear construction.
• Performance based design of concrete
• Foreign codes and standards adoption
Goal 4: Research needs
5.1. High Strength reinforcing steel5.2. Concrete Radiation Shielding5.3. Durability of concrete5.4. Performance based design5.5 Ultra-high Performance Concrete (UHPC)5.6 Use of lapped Splices in regions of low
bixial tension5.7 Temperature loading concrete
Summary
• Main issues– Improve process for NRC, DOE to adopt
new technology and standards– Long list of research need: how can they
be addressed?
What next?
• March 2011: receive comments from all NESCC members
• April 2011: publication of the report
• Dissemination of findings to SDOs, NRC, DOE– Presentation done by Ferraris at ACI Fall 2010 convention
to TTAG and ACI 349– Publication of report– Suggestion for other presentations?
• Note the TG would be dissolved upon publication of the report
Questions for you
• How to help NRC streamline the adoption of revised/new standards and codes?
• How can international standards be adopted by SDOs or NRC?
• How to address research needs? Who and funding?
• How to use this report?