53
Confident Body, Confident Child: A novel program for preventing body dissatisfaction and unhealthy eating patterns in preschoolers Dr Laura Hart [email protected] Norway, October 2019

Confident Body, Confident Child: A novel program for ......•Overweight/obesity (Rodgers Paxton et al 2013; Clark, Goyder et al 2007) •Body dissatisfaction (Agras, Bryson et al

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Confident Body, Confident Child: A novel program for preventing

    body dissatisfaction and unhealthy eating patterns in preschoolers

    Dr Laura Hart [email protected], October 2019

    mailto:[email protected]

  • 1. Background• Body attitudes

    • Body image

    • Weight bias

    • Eating patterns

    • The role of parents

    2. The CBCC resource

    3. Preparatory research

    4. Evaluation: CBCC RCT

    Presentation Overview

  • Background

  • Body image – what is it?

    • The way a person thinks and feels about their body

    • Not just about how you look

    • Developing from as young as 3 years

  • Body Image

    • Can be positive:Being accepting of and happy with one’s body shape and size “body satisfaction”

    • Can be negative:Disliking one’s body, which may cause shame, low self-esteem or distress“body dissatisfaction”

    • Can be a bit of both

  • Body dissatisfaction in children

    • 34% of 5 year old girls report using dietary restraint at least sometimes (Damiano et al, 2015)

    • Of 8-9 y.o. boys:

    • 45% scared of overweight;

    • 86% “think a lot about being skinny and having no muscles” (McCabe & Ricciardelli, 2003)

    • 30% of 15-19 year olds

    • ‘extremely’ or ‘very’ concerned about body image

    • n = 21,846 (Annual Youth Survey, Mission Australia)

  • Why worry about body image?

    • Having body dissatisfaction in early adolescence makes a child more likely to:• Do less exercise• Have low fruit/veg intake• Have low self-esteem• Become depressed• Have unhealthy eating habits (binge/diet)• Be overweight • Develop an eating disorder

    • Body image is an important public health concern

    (from Paxton et al, 2006/ Neumark-Sztainer et al, 2006/ Van den Berg & Neumark-Sztainer, 2007)

  • • Negative attitudes towards larger bodies, positive attitudes towards thin/muscular ones

    • Body attitudes are being established in early childhood

    • Weight bias occurs at a very young age

    Weight bias

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    • Naughty• Not invite to birthday party• Mean

    • Good• Invite to birthday party• Has the most friends

  • Development of Weight Bias

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1 2 3

    Mea

    n F

    igu

    re S

    ize

    Sele

    cted

    Age 3 Age 4 Age 5

    Mean child figure size selection score for positive and negative characteristics

    Negative Characteristics

    Positive Characteristics

    Spiel et al., 2012 BJ Dev Psych

  • Why does this matter?

    • Research into weight bias in children is new• Stigmatisation and bullying of

    overweight (Latner & Schwartz, 2005)

    • Greater body dissatisfaction for overweight (Puhl & Latner 2008)

    • Greater eating pathology (binge eating) (Puhl et al 2007)

    • Poorer psychological wellbeing if overweight (Davison et al, 2008)

  • Eating patterns in early childhood

    • Healthy patterns: Balance• Responding to hunger and satiety

    • Acceptance of a broad range of foods

    • Enjoying food for nutrition and celebration

    • Unhealthy patterns• Overeating (eating too much/too often/imbalance)

    • Using food to regulate emotions

    • Fussy/picky eating and neophobia (rarely lead to nutrient deficiencies)

    • Clinical eating disorders• Rare in children, not often measured

    • Binge eating/dieting can be present

  • Problem Eating Behaviour

    • Emotional eating

    • Restrained eating/Dietary restraint

    • External eating/Food responsiveness

  • Influences on body attitudes and eating

    • Genetics and temperament

    • Psychological/cognitive frameworks

    • Socio-cultural forces• Media and advertising

    • Peers

    • Family members• Siblings

    • Adult relations

    • Parents

  • The role of parents

    • Parental risk factors

    • Own body image and weight attitudes

    • Appearance-based teasing of child

    • Physical activity

    • Own eating practices

    • Parental feeding practices

  • Parental Feeding Practices

    • Behaviours to control what, how much or when children eat (Ventura & Birch, 2008)

    • Shown to be associated with the development of child• Disordered eating (Fisher, Sinton & Birch 2009; Blisset, Haycraft & Farrow 2010)

    • Overweight/obesity (Rodgers Paxton et al 2013; Clark, Goyder et al 2007)

    • Body dissatisfaction (Agras, Bryson et al 2007; Brown & Ogden, 2004)

    • Important targets for reducing child risk

  • Parental Feeding Practices

    Instrumental Feeding – Using food as reward or punishment

    Emotional Feeding – Giving food to soothe/calm

    Pushing to Eat – Encouraging to eat more/certain foods

    Fat Restriction – Restriction of foods the child is eating

    Weight-based Restriction – Attempt weight control

    Monitoring – Keeping track of what is eaten

    (Rodgers et al., IJBNPA 2013)

  • The role of parents

    • Parental risk factors

    • Own body image and weight attitudes

    • Appearance-based teasing of child

    • Physical activity

    • Own eating practices

    • Parental feeding practices

    • Parents are not the only source of influence… but

    • Critical agents biological/social environment

    • In early childhood they are gatekeepers

    • Peers

    • Media

    • Other family members

  • Confident Body, Confident Child

    Resource

  • • An evidence-based resource for parents of pre-school children (roughly 2- to 6- years)

    • Designed to promote positive body image and healthy eating patterns

    Confident Body, Confident Child

  • CBCC Parent Book

    • Healthy Body Weight• What is healthy?• Dieting• Physical activity• Screen time

    • Common Parental Concerns• Overweight• Body image• Fussy eating

    • Activities

    • Referral Pathways

    • Body Image• Social influences: Family, Peers,

    Media

    • Parent Body Image

    • Child Self-esteem

    • Teasing

    • Healthy Eating Patterns• Healthy attitudes

    • Sustainable patterns

    • Family meals

    • Reward feeding

  • CBCC Parent Session

    • 2 x2h session

    • Group 4-15 px

    • PPT/manual

    • Group discussion

    • Activities

    1. Body Image

    2. Healthy Eating Patterns

    3. Healthy Body Weight

  • • A balanced variety of foods

    • Balance of energy in and energy out through fun physical activity

    Healthy eating – what it is

    24 www.confidentbody.net

    Parent book p.47

  • • But it is also

    • A healthful attitude to food

    • Food for health and pleasure

    • Enjoying a wide variety

    • Eating without feeling bad about it and without it affecting your sense

    of self

    • Sustainable patterns of eating

    • Eating when hungry, stopping when full

    • Allowing times for celebration

    • No strict rules

    Healthy eating – what it is

    25 www.confidentbody.net

    Parent book p.47-49

  • • Enjoy eating without guilt or moralising

    • “Sometimes” and “everyday” foods instead of

    • Healthy vs unhealthy

    • Good vs bad

    • Junk / Treat/ Naughty

    • When talking about sometimes foods, talk about the effect on the body

    Teaching healthful attitudes

    26 www.confidentbody.net

  • Teaching healthful attitudes

    27 www.confidentbody.net

    • Too much salt can:

    • Stop your kidneys from making wee

    • Make you really, really thirsty

    • Too much sugar can:

    • Give you holes in your teeth

    • Make it hard to concentrate

    • Too much oily food can:

    • Make you feel sick

    • Stop the blood from pumping around your body

    properly

  • Preparatory research

  • CBCC Program of Research

    Phase 1Child and family health study

    Systematic literature reviews

    Stakeholder focus groups

    Delphi expert consensus study

    Phase 2Resource development

    Piloting – in person/survey

    Finalisation

    Phase 3 RCTBaseline (T1)

    6-weeks post-intervention (T2)

    6-months post-intervention (T3)

    12-months post-intervention (T4)

    Phase 4Effectiveness Pilots

    Child data

    Train-the-trainer networks

    Evaluation Dissemination!

  • Systematic Literature Review

    • Parents

    • Prevent/Risk/Protect

    • Body dissatisfaction

    • Disordered eating

    Risk factorsProtective factors

    CBCC Content

  • Image area

    • Develop expert consensus

    • Enhance decision making where RCT not possible

    • Questionnaires sent to experts for rating

    • Iterations with feedback to build consensus

    • Outcome: series of statements/actionswith high level of expert agreement

    The Delphi Method

  • Participants

    Round 1• N=28

    • 54% Research, 40% Clinical work, 40% Education/Training

    • 26 (93%) Female

    • Age range 27-69 (M=44.34, SD=12.09)

    • Australia, Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, United States

    Round 3• 89% retention rate (R1)

    28.6 %

    32.1 %

    25.0 %

    14.3 % Aus

    Cana

    USA

    UK

  • Endorsed strategies

    • 335 potential parenting strategies presented

    • 153 (46%) endorsed

    Consensus reached on a wide range of issues:• How to promote positive body image in

    young children• How to talk about dieting and healthy

    weight management• Encouraging regular physical activity• What to do about appearance-based

    teasing

  • Examples

    35

    QnrSection

    Proposed strategyParents should…

    Participant endorsement

    Healthy eating

    ...avoid labelling some foods as ‘bad’, as this may lead their child to desire these foods more and feel guilty when they are eaten.

    100%

    Body image

    ...encourage their child to take pride in their appearance, but balance this with emphasising other positive qualities not related to appearance.

    86% Round 185% Round 2

    Body image

    ...avoid frequently praising their child’s physical appearance.

    68%

    Body image

    ...reassure their child about their physical appearance and other physical attributes such as strength or balance.

    61%

    Physical activity

    ...promote to their child that physical activity is a means of losing weight.

    7%

    Endorsement = rating of "Essential” or "Important"

  • EvaluationRandomized controlled trial

    (RCT)

  • Four Arm Randomised Controlled Trial

    A.CBCC Resource

    Pack plus session

    B. Resource pack only

    C. Nutrition resource

    D. Wait list control – Surveys only

  • Happy Healthy Kids for Life

    • Dietary guidelines

    • Parental Feeding Practices• Instrumental

    • Emotional

    • Pushing to eat

    • Monitoring

    • Family meals, tv off

    • Sample menus

    • Pictorial portion sizes

  • Measures

    Parenting Variables• Knowledge Test for Body Image and Eating

    Patterns in Childhood (+)

    • Parenting Intentions for Body Image and Eating Patterns in Childhood• Positive intentions subscale (+)

    • Negative intentions (-)

    • Family Meal Times• Atmosphere (+)

    • Schedules (-)

    • Television (-)

    • Frequency (+)

    • Parental Feeding Practices• Instrumental feeding (-)

    • Emotional feeding (-)

    • Pushing to eat (-)

    • Fat restriction (-)

    • Weight Restriction (-)

    • Monitoring (+)

  • RCT: Participants

    • Eligibility• ≥ one child between the ages of 2-6 years• 18+ years• Sufficient English skills for questionnaire completion• Reside in Victoria

    • N = 345• 334 mothers (97%)

    • 24 and 51 years (M = 37.5)• BMI: 15 and 45 (M = 25)• 82% completion of a university degree

    • 11 fathers (3%)• 31 and 43 years (M = 37.5)• BMI: 21 and 30 (M =26)• 73% completion of a university degree

  • Participant retention

    Baseline6-week

    follow-up6 month follow-

    up12 month follow-up

    Group ACBCC resource + parent workshop

    77 68 58 50

    Group BCBCC resource only

    106 92 81 71

    Group CNutrition resource

    86 76 65 55

    Group DWait-list control

    76 69 59 51

    TOTAL 345305

    (88%)263

    (76%)227

    (66%)

  • Data analyses

    • Conservative approach• Linear mixed effects model (GLMM) was fitted for each parenting outcome

    to compare group allocation (ABCD) over time (Baseline, 6w, 6m, 12)• DV: parenting outcome

    • IVs: group allocation, time and group x time interaction

    • Intention to treat (participants with missing data included, N=345)

    • p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons

    • No sig differences across groups at baseline

  • MeasureSig group diff

    at 6-weeks

    Knowledge test (+)Positive intentions (+)Negative intentions (-)Family Meal atmos (+)Family Meal sched (-)Family Meal tv (-)Family Meal freq (+)

    XXXX✓

    Results

  • MeasureSig group diff

    at 6-weeksSig group diffat 6-months

    Knowledge test (+)Positive intentions (+)Negative intentions (-)Family Meal atmos (+)Family Meal sched (-)Family Meal tv (-)Family Meal freq (+)

    XXXX✓

    XXXXXX

    Results

  • MeasureSig group diff

    at 6-weeksSig group diffat 6-months

    Sig group diffat 12-months

    Knowledge test (+)Positive intentions (+)Negative intentions (-)Family Meal atmos (+)Family Meal sched (-)Family Meal tv (-)Family Meal freq (+)

    XXXX✓

    XXXXXX

    XXXXXX

    Results

  • MeasureSig group diff

    at 6-weeks

    Instrumental feeding (-)Emotional feeding (-)Pushing to eat (-)Fat restriction (-)Weight restriction (-)Monitoring (+)

    XXX✓

    X

    Results – Parental Feeding Practices

  • MeasureSig group diff

    at 6-weeksSig group diffat 6-months

    Instrumental feeding (-)Emotional feeding (-)Pushing to eat (-)Fat restriction (-)Weight restriction (-)Monitoring (+)

    XXX✓

    X

    XXXX✓

    X

    Results – Parental Feeding Practices

  • MeasureSig group diff

    at 6-weeksSig group diffat 6-months

    Sig group diffat 12-months

    Instrumental feeding (-)Emotional feeding (-)Pushing to eat (-)Fat restriction (-)Weight restriction (-)Monitoring (+)

    XXX✓

    X

    XXXX✓

    X

    XXXXXX

    Results – Parental Feeding Practices

  • Summary• Early childhood is an important time for promoting healthy body attitudes and

    eating patterns

    • Parents play an especially important role in shaping pre-schooler development

    • The CBCC resource was carefully designed to meet parent needs and teach evidence-based strategies

    • RCT revealed • A significant, positive impact on knowledge (12m) and weight-restriction (6m)• Group A appeared to perform slightly better• Follow-up data were important in revealing how long lasting impacts were• Not sure whether the significant improvements in parenting variables resulted in

    meaningful changes for children

    • But our more recent studies have confirmed significant improvements in Body Esteem among children of parents receiving CBCC

  • Thank you• CBCC Research Team

    • Susan Paxton

    • Laura Hart

    • Stephanie Damiano

    • Agus Salim

    • Connie Li Wai Suen

    • Fiona Sutherland

    • Chelsea Cornell

    • Deirdre Ryan

    • Robin Massey

    • Rianna Chapman

    • Funding support from • Australian Rotary Health

    • Cages Foundation

    • La Trobe University Building Healthy Communities

    Contact:[email protected]/ confidentbodystudy