9
Congress submission to the Redesigning the Practice Incentive Program consultation Summary This response to the Commonwealth Department of Health’s Redesigning the Practice Incentive Program (PIP) consultation paper has been prepared by the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress (Congress). Congress is the largest Aboriginal community-controlled health service (ACCHS) in the Northern Territory, providing a comprehensive, holistic and culturally-appropriate primary health care service to more than 13 000 Aboriginal people living in and nearby Alice Springs, including six remote communities. In principle, Congress is supportive of a redesigned PIP that supports quality improvement practices in primary health care. As an ACCHS, Congress already has a well-designed Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) program which is likely to be enhanced by the outcomes of the redesign. Congress fully supports the intention to retain the rural loading incentive; the afterhours incentive; the teaching payment; and eHealth incentive. These are important payments to sustain quality services for our population. Overall the PIP is a vital funding source for Congress. PIP revenue is reinvested back into the comprehensive primary health care services provided by Congress which aim to close the gap in health outcomes between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in Central Australia. Any redesign of the PIP should not compromise this revenue. There are a number of principles to consider in the redesign process. These include: 1) Maintaining recognition of Indigenous disadvantage by keeping the existing Indigenous Health PIP or weighting the cost of Indigenous disadvantage within a streamlined Quality Improvement PIP 2) Administrative processes including data collection and reporting that is less onerous than existing processes 3) Maintaining a focus on managing chronic disease as this accounts for 80% of the Life Expectancy gap here in the NT between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. 4) Transparent use of data for benchmarking against peers and public accountability 5) Maintain the Closing the Gap Indigenous Chronic Disease Co-Payment 6) Continue to allow for flexibility in how practices use their PIP revenue 7) Ensure there is ongoing consultation with ACCHSs in the PIP redesign and modelling

Congress response to redesigning the PIP - CAAC · 2 1. Introduction This response to the Redesigning the Practice Incentive Scheme (PIP) consultation paper has been prepared by Central

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CongresssubmissiontotheRedesigningthePracticeIncentiveProgramconsultation

Summary

ThisresponsetotheCommonwealthDepartmentofHealth’sRedesigningthePracticeIncentiveProgram(PIP)consultationpaperhasbeenpreparedbytheCentralAustralianAboriginalCongress(Congress).

CongressisthelargestAboriginalcommunity-controlledhealthservice(ACCHS)intheNorthernTerritory,providingacomprehensive,holisticandculturally-appropriateprimaryhealthcareservicetomorethan13000AboriginalpeoplelivinginandnearbyAliceSprings,includingsixremotecommunities.

Inprinciple,CongressissupportiveofaredesignedPIPthatsupportsqualityimprovementpracticesinprimaryhealthcare.AsanACCHS,Congressalreadyhasawell-designedContinuousQualityImprovement(CQI)programwhichislikelytobeenhancedbytheoutcomesoftheredesign.

Congressfullysupportstheintentiontoretaintheruralloadingincentive;theafterhoursincentive;theteachingpayment;andeHealthincentive.Theseareimportantpaymentstosustainqualityservicesforourpopulation.

OverallthePIPisavitalfundingsourceforCongress.PIPrevenueisreinvestedbackintothecomprehensiveprimaryhealthcareservicesprovidedbyCongresswhichaimtoclosethegapinhealthoutcomesbetweenAboriginalandnon-AboriginalpeopleinCentralAustralia.AnyredesignofthePIPshouldnotcompromisethisrevenue.

Thereareanumberofprinciplestoconsiderintheredesignprocess.Theseinclude:

1) MaintainingrecognitionofIndigenousdisadvantagebykeepingtheexistingIndigenousHealthPIPorweightingthecostofIndigenousdisadvantagewithinastreamlinedQualityImprovementPIP

2) Administrativeprocessesincludingdatacollectionandreportingthatislessonerousthanexistingprocesses

3) Maintainingafocusonmanagingchronicdiseaseasthisaccountsfor80%oftheLifeExpectancygaphereintheNTbetweenAboriginalandnon-Aboriginalpeople.

4) Transparentuseofdataforbenchmarkingagainstpeersandpublicaccountability

5) MaintaintheClosingtheGapIndigenousChronicDiseaseCo-Payment

6) ContinuetoallowforflexibilityinhowpracticesusetheirPIPrevenue

7) EnsurethereisongoingconsultationwithACCHSsinthePIPredesignandmodelling

2

1. Introduction

ThisresponsetotheRedesigningthePracticeIncentiveScheme(PIP)consultationpaperhasbeenpreparedbyCentralAustralianAboriginalCongress(Congress).

CongressisthelargestAboriginalcommunity-controlledhealthservice(ACCHS)intheNorthernTerritory,providingacomprehensive,holisticandculturally-appropriateprimaryhealthcareservicetomorethan13000AboriginalpeoplelivinginandnearbyAliceSprings,includingsixremotecommunities;Amoonguna,NtariaandWallaceRockhole,LtentyeApurte(SantaTeresa),Utju(Areyonga)andMutitjulu.

2. Contextforresponse

Whilethegapinsomehealthoutcomeshasdecreasedinrecentyears,Aboriginalpeoplestillexperienceadiseaseburdenthatis2.3timeshigherthannon-Aboriginalpeople.IntheNorthernTerritorytheconditionsthatcontributemosttothehigherburdenofdiseaseforAboriginalpeopleinclude:cardiovasculardiseases,mentalandsubstanceusedisorders,injuries,kidney&urinarydiseases,infectiousdiseasesandendocrinedisorders(whichincludesdiabetes).1Chronicdiseasesareresponsibleformorethan80%ofthegapindiseaseburden,whichisworseinremoteandveryremoteareas.

ACCHSs,suchasCongress,functionwithintheframeworkofacomprehensiveprimaryhealthcare(CPHC)service,whichaimstoaddresshealthinequitiesandclosethehealthgapbetweenAboriginalandnon-Aboriginalpeoplethroughprovidinghighquality,accessible,multidisciplinaryclinicalcareaswellastakingactiontoaddressthebroaderunderlying,socialdeterminantsofhealth..ACCHSs’servicepopulationsthathavesignificantlymorecomplexhealthneeds,andfrequentlyliveinrural,remoteorouter-suburbanareaswhereprivatepracticebusinessmodelsstruggleandserviceaccessisaparticularchallenge.ACCHSsprovideacomprehensivemodelofcarethatgoesbeyondthetreatmentofindividualclientsfordiscretemedicalconditionstoinclude2:

• afocusonculturalsecurity;

• assistancewithaccesstohealthcare(e.g.patienttransporttotheACCHSandsupportandadvocacytoaccesscareelsewhereinthehealthsystem);

• populationhealthprogramsincludinghealthpromotionandprevention;

• publichealthadvocacyandintersectorialcollaboration;

• participationinlocal,regionalandsystem-widehealthplanningprocesses;

• structuresforcommunityengagementandcontrol;and

• significantemploymentofAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderpeople.

TheevidencepointstoACCHSasahighlyeffectivemodelforaddressingAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderhealthandtheyarethereforerecognisedasthebestpracticemodelforprimaryhealthcareservicesforAboriginalpeopleinallthekeynationalstrategydocumentsincludingtheNationalAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderHealthPlan(NATSIHP).Akeyrecentstudyconcluded:

3

...somestudiesshowingthatACCHSareimprovingoutcomesforAboriginalpeople,andsomeshowingthattheyachieveoutcomescomparabletothoseofmainstreamservices,butwithamorecomplexcaseload3.

Inparticular,ACCHSscontributesignificantlytoreductionsincommunicabledisease,improveddetectionandmanagementofchronicdisease,andbetterchildandmaternalhealthoutcomesincludingreductionsinpretermbirthsandincreasesinbirthweight4.

ThekeyroleofACCHSsissupportedbythefactthatAboriginalpeopleshowaclearpreferencefortheuseofACCHSs,leadingtogreateraccesstocareandbetteradherencetotreatmentregimes5.

TheroleofACCHSsisparticularlyclearintheNorthernTerritory,wheretheircomprehensivemodelofservicedeliveryandadvocacyforpublichealthandsystemreformhasbeenthefoundationformuchoftherelativesuccessofthatjurisdictioninreducingmortalityrates.6

FurtherdetailoftheCPHCframeworkandcoreservicesisatAppendixA.

3. ContributionofthePIPtoACCHSandthedeliveryofcomprehensiveprimaryhealthcareservices.

PIPpaymentsareavitalcontributiontoCongress’incomeandannualbudget.CongressisaccreditedundertheRACGP’sStandardsforGeneralPractice,andisthereforeeligibleforPIPincentives.Asgrantfundinghaslargelybeencapped,PIPincentives,alongwiththeMedicareBenefitsSchedule(MBS),arethemajorsourceofgrowthfunding.ThisgrowthfundingenablesCongresstomeetincreasedneedandreviewanddevelopservicesinadynamicway,withouthavingtogothroughacumbersome,budgetappropriationprocess.ThishelpstoimproveaccesstoservicesforAboriginalpeopleinremoteareasaswellasencouragebestpracticeinareassuchasscreeningandchronicdiseasemanagement.Itisavitalwayoffundingthecareprovidedtothe3000AboriginalpeoplewhoutiliseCongressserviceseachyearwhodonotliveinourhealthserviceareaandarethereforenotincludedinourgrantfunding.

Congress’servicesandclientprofilemeanstheserviceiseligibleforanumberofPIPincentives,inparticularIndigenousHealth,Diabetes,CervicalScreening,Asthma,eHealth,Ruralloading,AfterHoursandTeaching.Forinstance,Congressseesapproximately2400patientseachyearinAliceSpringswhoareeligiblefortheIndigenousincentive.Over30percentofCongressresidentclientshaveatleastonechronicdiseaseandover44percenthavecomorbidities.Around1500patientsareeligiblefortheDiabetesincentive.Congressalsorunstheonlyafter-hoursclinicinAliceSpringswhichisopenonweekendsandpublicholidays,inadditiontoprovidingamajorgeneralpracticeteachingprograminpartnershipwithNorthernTerritoryGeneralPracticeEducation(NTGPE).

Althoughtheincomeisvital,administrativeprocessesareaburdenforbothstaffandpatients.Thismeansthateveniftheworkisdone,theincentivesarenotalwaysaccessedandrevenuereceiveddoesnotnecessarilyreflectoverallactivity.However,withimprovedprocessesandasystematicdrivetoincreaseitsuseofthePIP,CongressisontracktoreceiveaprojectedPIPincomeof$1.45millionin2016/17.Itisexpectedthat$1.2millionwillcomefromfulluseoftheIndigenousHealthPIP.

4

AswithallincomereceivedbyCongress,thePIPpaymentsarereinvestedbackintotheexistingservicesandactivitiesinprevention,clinicalandsocialsupportservices,continuousqualityimprovement,workforce,educationandtraining,allofwhichcontributetoClosingtheGap.ThecombinationofPIPandMBSpayments,alongsideprimaryhealthcaregrantfunding,providesaleveloffundingthatisclosertomeetingtheneedforprimaryhealthcareservicesasdeterminedbytheNorthernTerritoryAboriginalHealthForumsCoreFunctionsofPrimaryHealthCare(seeAppendixA).Thereisstillaneedforadditionalprimaryhealthcarefundinginsomeareas.

ItisessentialthenthatthereisnoreductioninthisincomestreamasaresultofaredesignedPIPscheme.Congress’participationinanationalschemewouldbecontingentonfurtherunderstandingofpotentialrevenuecomparedwithcurrentrevenue.4. ACCHSqualityframework

AsanACCHS,Congressusesaccreditation(generalpracticestandardsandISO9001),CQI,andperformancereportingtodriveimprovementsinthequalityandsafetyofitsservicesandoutcomesforitspatients.Congresshasawell-developedCQIprogramanddedicatedCQIsectionwhichassistsmanagersandtheexecutiveleadershipbyprovidingreliabledatafordecisionmaking.QuantitativedataisalsousedtoreportonNTAboriginalHealthKeyPerformanceIndicators(NTAHKPIs)andnationalKPIs(nKPIs).Thesubmissionofthesedataiscompulsoryandresultsarepublicallyreported.

Congress’CQIteamsupportsongoingserviceimprovementandsupportsevidenced-informeddecisionsacrossallCongressprograms.TheCQIteampresentsbi-annualnKPIandNTAHKPIreportstoCongressclinicteams.Thesereportsareusedbyprogrammanagerstodevelopnewoperationalplansandtoidentifyareasrequiringimprovement.ThefundamentalaimsoftheCQIframeworkinclude:developingCQIcapacity;aPlan-Do-Study-Act(PDSA)improvementcyclethatprovidesastructurefortestingchangestoimprovethequalityofservices;andteamwork.

Forexample,inoneyeartheanaemiainchildrenlessthan5yearsPSDAcyclehasreducedanaemiaratesfrom18to13percentinurbanclinics,andfrom13to2percentinaremoteclinic.Improvementshavebeenduetoacollaborativeeffortbyclinicstaffincludinggoalsetting,outcomemeasures,evidenced-basedclinicalinterventions,innovativeorganisationalandpracticechange,andreviewingoutcomestoseehowtheyhaveworked(seeAttachmentA).

TheCQIprogramalsositswithinthebroadersystemofclinicalgovernanceywhichincludes:

§ TheCQIClinicalgovernancecommitteewhichundertakesarootcauseanalysisofincidentsandcomplaints,leadsCQIpriorityareasandoverseesthedevelopmentandreviewofclinicalpoliciesandproceduresessentialforCQI.

§ Staffcredentialingandregistration§ Complaints,incidentsandsuggestionsandCQIregisters§ Clinicalaudits§ Developmentandreviewoftheclinicalinformationsystem(Communicare)§ DevelopmentofoperationalplanswithappropriateKPIsforallprogramsandservices

5

5. Overallcommentsonredesignproposalandoptions

5.1. QualityPracticeImprovementIncentivePayment

Inprinciple,theconceptofaQualityPracticeImprovementIncentivePaymentbyconsolidatingmainstreamPIPitemsissupported.Congresshasawell-developedCQIprogramwhich,underthesuggestedchanges,willberewardedandencouraged.Thereisgoodevidencethatthiswillleadtoabetterqualityprimaryhealthcaresystemoverall.7

ThechangessuggestedintheconsultationpaperwillenhancetheaimsandprinciplesoftheexistingCQIframework.Theproposedredesignsupportsadata-driven,innovation-focusedqualityimprovementmodel.Thisispartofaworldwideshiftfromvolume-basedhealth-caretoafocusonvalue-basedhealthcarewithincentivesdrivingqualityandinnovation,ratherthanquantity.8CongresshasbeenpractisingthisapproachformanyyearsnowandsupportsthemovetoincentivisethistypeofsystemsapproachtoCQIratherthanindividualdiseasemanagement.

GiventhatACCHSsundertaketheirownrigorousCQIprograms,CongressissupportiveofdesignOption1-theadministrationofthePIPQualityImprovementIncentivebybuildingonexistingactivities.Option2,PIPadministeredthroughathirdpartyproviderwouldnotbesupported.TheexperienceofathirdpartyproviderinthenationalKPIsystemforAboriginalhealthhasnotbeengoodanditisalmostcertainthattheredesignedsystemwillonlymakeuseofappropriatespecialistpublicinstitutionssuchastheAIHWtoovercomethesedifficulties.

5.2. Retainingfourexistingincentivepayments

Congressfullysupportstheintentiontoretaintheruralloadingincentive;theafterhoursincentive;theteachingpayment;andeHealthincentive.Thesearevitallyimportantpaymentstosustainqualityservicesforourpopulationandneedtoberetainedatthesamerate,forexampleremoteloadingiscurrently25percentforAliceSpringsand50percentforremotecommunities.

5.3. Keyconcernsandrecommendations

ThereareanumberofconcernsthatwillalsoneedtobeaddressedinthefurtherdevelopmentoftheredesignedPIP.Theseinclude:

1) MaintainingrecognitionofIndigenousdisadvantage.

TheredesignofthePIPwillneedtotakeintoaccountthecomplexityofAboriginaldisadvantageandhealthoutcomes.ApaymentmechanismshouldcontinuetobeinplacesothatthereisstillafocusonclosingthehealthgapbetweenAboriginalandnon-Aboriginalpeopleandthatthereisnofurtherdisadvantagethroughlossofservices.Optionsinclude:

§ KeeptheexistingIHPIP,atthecurrentpaymentof$500perpersonperyear.

§ Alternatively,weightingthecostofAboriginaldisadvantagewithinastreamlinedPIPincentivebyatleast$500pereligiblepersonperyearsothatnorevenueislost

Additionally,astheHealthCareHomes(HCH)trialevolves,identification,selection,enrolmentandsubsequenttieredpaymentswillneedtoaccountandcostforAboriginaldisadvantage.Atthisstage

6

inthedevelopmentandtestingofriskstratificationtools,measuringtheadditionalimpactofdisadvantageofAboriginalpeopleonhealthrisksrcanbeestimated.Forexample,itisknownthatriskcalculators,suchastheFraminghamCardiovascularRiskCalculator,underestimatethecardiovascularrisksforAboriginalpeople,sointheCentralAustralianRuralPractitioner’sAssociation(CARPA)Manualanadditional5percentloadingisaddedontocreateanAboriginalspecificcardiovascularriskcalculator.ThishasalsobeendonetogetanappropriatecardiovascularriskassessmentforMaoripeopleinNewZealand.IthasnotbeenpossibletoidentifyexactlythereasonsfortheincreasedriskotherthantogivealoadingforAboriginalpeopleasthereasonssuchas“lackofcontrol”aretoohardtomeasureanyotherway.

TheHCHtrialriskstratificationtoolshouldthereforeinitiallyincludeAboriginalityasacriteriatoaccountforsocioeconomicdisadvantageandhigherserviceneedsofAboriginalpeoplewithoneormorechronicdiseases,toatleastthelevelofthecurrentPIP(i.e.plus$500perpatient).

Thisshouldensurethereisnolossofrevenueandrelatedserviceandshouldcontinueuntil:

§ TheriskstratificationtoolcanmoreaccuratelyassessthecomplexityofAboriginalhealthdisadvantageandindividualneed;or

§ thehealthgapcloses.

2) Administrativeprocessesincludingdatacollectionandreportingthatislessonerousthanexistingprocesses

ThedatacollectionprocessforaredesignedPIPincentiveshouldbelessonerousthantheadministrativeburdenofthecurrentPIP.Itshouldalsobeusefulforlocaldecision-making.ThecurrentAHNTKPIreportsandnKPIreportsthatCongressalreadyproducesshouldbesufficienttomeetthedatarequirementoftherevisedCQIPIPprogramandsuchsystemsofreportingonkeyhealthserviceperformancedatashouldbeextendedtomainstreamgeneralpractice.CurrentlythepurposeofAHNTKPIandnKPIdataisto‘improvethedeliveryofprimaryhealthcareservicesbysupportingcontinuousqualityimprovement(CQI)activityamongserviceproviders’9.However,itisimportantthatdatacollectedalsosupportslocalCQIactivitiesandthatservicescanindependentlyaccesstheirowntrendinformationaswellascomparetheirdatawithpeers10.

3) Maintainingafocusonmanagingchronicdisease

Cautionisneededinbundlingdataandpaymentssothatafocusonkeychronicdiseasesisnotlostaltogether,divertingattentionfromaspectsofcarenottargetedbyincentivese.g.eyechecksonpatientswithdiabetes.Thefocusonimprovedchronicdiseasemanagementshouldcontinue,thoughassessedthroughoutputandoutcomemeasuresratherthanjustprocessmeasures,toencouragecollaborationandteamcare.

4) Transparentuseofdataforbenchmarkingagainstpeersandpublicaccountability

Overtime,practiceCQIdatashouldbetransparentandpublicbutthiswillneedappropriatefurtherconsultationandnotberushedaspartoftheimplementationofthereformedPIP.Thiswillincreaseaccountabilityandassistpracticestoimprovebycomparingdatawithotherpractices.11However,datacomparisonswillneedtotakeintoaccountpopulationdemographicsthatinfluenceprocesses

7

andoutcomeindicators(e.g.socialdisadvantage,age,diseaseprevalence)whereclientswillhavepoorerhealthoutcomesandserviceusageotherpopulations.

5) MaintaintheClosingtheGapIndigenousChronicDiseaseCo-Payment

TheIndigenousHealthPIPislinkedtotheClosingtheGapIndigenousChronicDiseaseCo-Payment(CTG)whichallowsAboriginalpeopletohavetheirPharmaceuticalBenefitsSchemeco-paymentreducedfromthegeneralco-paymentratetotheconcessionalrate.PrescribersmusteitherbefromanaccreditedGeneralPractice,orfromanon-remote(i.e.nonSection100approved)AboriginalHealthServices.TheremovaloftheIndigenousHealthPIPwillimpactontheGTPco-payment.OnesolutionwillbetodelinktotheCTGprescriptionsfromtheIndigenousHealthPIP.

6) ContinuetoallowforflexibilityinhowpracticesusetheirPIPrevenue

OrganisationsshouldnothaveconditionsorlimitationsonhowPIPrevenueisreinvestedbackintotheprimarycareservice.Thisshouldcontinuetobesomethingthatlocalhealthservicescandeterminetobestmeetthelocalneedsforimprovedandenhancedservices.

7) EnsurethereisongoingconsultationwithACCHSsinthePIPredesignandmodelling

Thereshouldbeanumberofconsultationsastheoptionsarefurtherdeveloped.AnymodellingofincentivesandpotentialrevenueshouldbecheckedagainstthepotentiallossofincentivestoACCHS.

8

AppendixATheimportanceofcomprehensiveprimaryhealthcare

Theterm'primaryhealthcare'(PHC)gainedwidespreadcurrencyfollowingtheAlma-AtaConferenceheldbytheWorldHealthOrganisationin197812.ThedefinitionofPHCadvancedbyAlmaAtawascomprehensive:aswellastheprovisionofmedicalcare,italsocapturestheidealof‘wellness’asagoal,andprevention,healthpromotion,advocacyandcommunitydevelopmentasmajormethodstoachieveit.Itemphasisestheneedformaximumcommunityandindividualself-relianceandparticipationandinvolvescollaborationwithothersectors.

ThiscomprehensivedefinitionofprimaryhealthcareisnowbroadlyacceptedinAustraliaespeciallywhenitcomestoimprovingthehealthofdisadvantagedpopulationssuchasthatofAustralia’sAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderpeoples13.

Awell-resourcedandrobustcomprehensiveprimaryhealthcaresystemisthereforeacriticallyimportantplatformfromwhichtoaddressthehealthofAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderAustralians.

Coreprimaryhealthcareservices

Congressfunctionswithintheframeworkofacomprehensiveprimaryhealthcare(CPHC)service,addressinghealthinequities,andaimingtoclosethegapbetweenAboriginalandnon-Aboriginalpeople.Theeffectivenessofthismodelisduetothewideandinnovativerangeofstrategiesthatprovideequityofaccesstoculturallyappropriateservicesandprogramsthatareaffordableandacceptabletothecommunity,andholisticallycareforhealthandwellbeingofAboriginalpeople.

AnotherkeypartoftheprogressiverealisationoftheCPHCvision,whichhasbeenleadingthehealthimprovementthathasoccurredintheNorthernTerritory,hasbeenincreasingiterationsofwhathasbecomeknownas“coreprimaryhealthcareservices”whichtranslatethePHCnormsandprinciplesintothecoreoutputsofAboriginalprimaryhealthcarepracticeincludingarangeofclinicalservices,supportservices,socialandpreventativeprogramsandpolicyandadvocacyfunctions.Therehavebeenthreeiterationsofthecoreprimaryhealthcareservicesmodelwiththemostrecentandcomprehensiveversionproducedin2011inwhichtherearefiveservicedomains14:

1. ClinicalServices2. HealthPromotion3. CorporateServicesandInformation4. Advocacy,Knowledge,Research,PolicyandPlanning5. CommunityEngagement,ControlandCulturalSafety

Definingcoreservicesispartofdefiningtheprogressiverealisationoftherighttohealthastheobligationongovernmentstoensureaccesstoevidence-basedservicesandprogramsaccordingtoneedismademoreexplicit.AustraliahastheresourcestoensurealloftheservicesandprogramsoutlinedinthiscoreservicesmodelareaccessiblethroughACCHSs.Thisincludesservicesandprogramsinareassuchasearlychildhood,familysupport,alcoholandotherdrugtreatmentandagedanddisabilitycarealongwiththemorefamiliarclinical,maternalandchildhealth,chronicdiseaseandotherservices.ResourcingallofthecoreserviceswillenableCPHCtomakeitsmaximumcontributiontoClosingtheGap.Alongwiththedevelopmentofthesecoreserviceshasbeenthe

9

correspondingdevelopmentcoreprimaryhealthcareindicatorsthatenableeachservicetotrackitsownprogressinkeyareasandreportthistotheircommunities.

1AIHW2016.AustralianBurdenofDiseaseStudy:ImpactandcausesofillnessanddeathinAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderpeople2011.AustralianBurdenofDiseaseStudyseriesno.6.Cat.no.BOD7.Canberra:AIHW.2ThompsonSC,HaynesE,etal.(2013).EffectivenessofprimaryhealthcareforAboriginalAustralians.Canberra,UnpublishedliteraturereviewcommissionedbytheAustralianGovernmentDepartmentofHealth,MackeyP,BoxallA,etal.(2014).TherelativeeffectivenessofAboriginalCommunityControlledHealthServicescomparedwithmainstreamhealthservice.DeebleInstituteEvidenceBriefNo.12,DeebleInstitute/AustralianHealthcareandHospitalsAssociation,NationalAboriginalCommunityControlledHealthOrganisation(NACCHO)(2014).EconomicValueofAboriginalCommunityControlledHealthServices.Unpublishedpaper.Canberra,NACCHO.3MackeyP,BoxallA,etal.(2014).TherelativeeffectivenessofAboriginalCommunityControlledHealthServicescomparedwithmainstreamhealthservice.DeebleInstituteEvidenceBriefNo.12,DeebleInstitute/AustralianHealthcareandHospitalsAssociation.Page64Dwyer,J.,K.Silburn,etal.(2004).NationalstrategiesforimprovingIndigenoushealthandhealthcare.AboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderPrimaryHealthCareReview:ConsultantReportNo1.Canberra,CommonwealthofAustralia.5VosT,CarterR,etal.(2010).AssessingCost-EffectivenessinPrevention(ACE–Prevention):FinalReport.Melbourne,ACE–PreventionTeam:UniversityofQueensland,BrisbaneandDeakinUniversity.6 AustralianInstituteofHealthandWelfare(2015)AboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderHealthPerformanceFramework2014report:NorthernTerritory.Cat.no.IHW159.Canberra:AIHW,page240 7 Sibthrope,B.,Garnder,K.andMcAullay,D.FurtheringthequalityagendainAboriginalcommunitycontrolledhealthservices:understandingtherelationshipbetweenaccreditiation,continuousqualityimprovementandnationalkeyperformanceindicatorreporting.AustralianjournalofPrimaryHealth,2016,22,270-275.8 Henke,N,Kelsy,T.,andWhately,H.,Transparency-Themostpowerfuldriverofhealthcareimprovement?HealthInternational.McKinseyhealthsystemsandhealthservicespractice2011. 9 AustralianInstituteofHealthandWelfare(AIHW)NationalKeyPerformanceIndicatorsforAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderprimaryhealth:firstnationalresultsJune2012toJune2013.Availableathttp://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129546941&tab=2 10 Sibthrope,B.,Garnder,K.andMcAullay,D.FurtheringthequalityagendainAboriginalcommunitycontrolledhealthservices:understandingtherelationshipbetweenaccreditiation,continuousqualityimprovementandnationalkeyperformanceindicatorreporting.AustralianjournalofPrimaryHealth,2016,22,270-275. 11 Henke,N,Kelsy,T.,andWhately,H.,Transparency-Themostpowerfuldriverofhealthcareimprovement?HealthInternational.McKinseyhealthsystemsandhealthservicespractice2011.12 WorldHealthOrganization(1978).Alma-Ata:PrimaryHealthCare.13 AustralianMedicalAssociation.(2010)."PrimaryHealthCare."Retrieved22September,2010,fromhttp://ama.com.au/node/5992.;AustralianDivisionsofGeneralPractice.(2005)."PrimaryHealthCarePositionStatement."Retrieved22September,2010,fromhttp://www.agpn.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/16269/20051026_pos_AGPN-Primary-Health-Care-Position-Statement-FINAL.pdf.NationalAboriginalCommunityControlledHealthOrganisation(NACCHO)."Primaryhealthcare."RetrievedSeptember2010,fromhttp://www.naccho.org.au/definitions/primaryhealth.html.14 Tilton,EandThomas,D2011NorthernTerritoryAboriginalHealthForumCoreFunctionsofPrimaryHealthCare:aFrameworkfortheNorthernTerritoryPreparedfortheNorthernTerritoryAboriginalHealthForum,Darwin.