Connecting ASBU with your State Air Navigation Plan · Connecting ASBU with your State Air Navigation Plan For: CANSO Latin America and Caribbean Conference 2015 ... FRTO Free Route

1

Connecting ASBU with

your State Air Navigation Plan

For: CANSO Latin America and Caribbean Conference 2015

Presented by: M. Tanino, ATO International NextGen Lead

Date: October 20, 2015

2

You will learn…

• Air Navigation Plan (ANP)

• Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU)

• Relationship between ASBU and ANP

• Why and What for me?

• What do I have to do to create the State

ANP?

• How the State ANP look like?

3

Safety

EnvironmentEfficiency

Procedures

Procedures

Procedures

$2.2 trillion

2.9 billion

$5.3 trillion

Why?

4

Do you remember?

188x104x25mmTape width: 12.7mm

156x96x25mmTape width: 12.65mm

BetamaxVHS

5

ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan

What is the GANP?• Supports a harmonized global Air Navigation System

• It is an overarching framework

• Addresses key civil aviation policy principles

• Assists ICAO Regions and States to establish air navigation priorities for the next 15 years

• Assists ICAO Regions and States to prepare their navigation plans

5

6

ICAO Regional and Member States’

Air Navigation Plans (ANPs)

• Following the 12th Air Navigation

Conference, a new GANP was

developed and approved by the

38th Session of the ICAO

Assembly in Sep/Oct 2013.

• IP Regional Air Navigation

Plan Template and

Procedure for Amendment

was presented in 2014.

GANP

Regional ANPs

State ANPs

7

New Electrical ANP (eANP)

• Improve access and version control by migrating

the ANPs from paper‐based and early electronic

version into a web‐based platform to facilitate

easy access

• Provide more effective amendment process

• Align the content of the regional ANPs with the

revised GANP and ASBUs

• Remove unnecessary and duplicated

information that is available elsewhere

8

• ANGUILA• ANTIGUA Y BARBUDA• ARGENTINA• ARUBA• BAHAMAS• BARBADOS• BELICE• BERMUDA• BOLIVIA• BRASIL• BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS• CAYMAN ISLANDS• COSTA RICA• COLOMBIA• CUBA• CHILE• DFT UNITED KINGDOM

• NETHERLANDS FOR BONAIRE, SINT EUSTATIUS AND SABA ISLANDS

• NICARAGUA• PANAMA• PARAGUAY• PERU• REPUBLICA DOMINICANA• SAINT VINCENT AND THE

GRENADINES• SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS• SAINT LUCIA• SAINT MAARTEN• SURINAM• TURKS AND CAICOS• URUGUAY• VENEZUELA

• DOMINICA• ECUADOR• EL SALVADOR• FRENCH ANTILLES• CHILE• DFT UNITED KINGDOM• DOMINICA• ECUADOR• EL SALVADOR• FRENCH ANTILLES• GUYANA SOUTH AMERICA• GRENADA• GUATEMALA• HAITI• HONDURAS• JAMAICA• MONTSERRAT

Latin America and Caribbean States

9

Regional ANP

GANP

Regional ANPStateANP

10

• Volume I – Stable plan elements. Amendments

require approval by the Council

• Volume II – Dynamic plan elements – amendments

are approved by regional agreement

• Volume III – Dynamic/flexible plan elements

for implementation, planning and guidance

using ASBU and technology road maps. These

elements require approval by Planning

Implementation Regional Groups (PIRGs) - does not

require approval by the Council

Content of the new Regional eANP

11

Summary of ANP

• GANP

• Regional ANP

• State ANP

12

Relationship: GANP and ASBU

GANP introduces:

• ASBU approach

• ASBU structure

• Future capabilities

• Priorities

• Technology roadmaps

13

Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU)

• Background– NextGen, SESAR, CARATS, and other States provide the

foundation for ASBU

• GANP provides and information on:– ASBU framework

– ASBU modules and associated technologies

• ASBU are designed so that:– Regions and States can select modules and implement

based on their operational needs

– Regions and States can implement modules according to their schedule

14

ASBU Structure: (1) Performance

Improvement Areas (PIA), (2) Blocks,

(3) Threads, (4) Modules, and (5) Elements

14

PIA 1

PIA 2

PIA 3

PIA 4

15

Performance Improvement Areas (PIA)

and Phases of Flight

PIA 1: Airport Operations

PIA 2: Globally Interoperable Systems & Data

PIA 3: Optimum Capacity and Flexible Flights

PIA 4: Efficient Flight Paths

16

PIA 1

PIA 2

PIA 3

PIA 4

ASBU: Performance Improvement Areas,

Blocks, Threads, Modules, and Elements

17

PIA 1: Airport OperationsBlock 0Thread Block 1 Block 2 Block 3

B0-APTA B1-APTA

B0-WAKE B1-WAKE B2-WAKE

B0-SURF B1-SURF B2-SURF

B0-ACDM B1-ACDM

B0-RSEQ B1-RSEQ B2-RSEQ B3-RSEQ

ACDM

APTA

RATS

RSEQ

SURF

WAKE

B1-RATS

18

ASBU ThreadsAirport Operations - Full

AMAN/DMAN/SMAN

ACDM Airport CDM

APTA Airport Accessibility

RATS Remote ATS

RSEQ Runway Sequencing

SURF Surface Operations

WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation

Globally Interoperable Systems & Data

- through Globally Interoperable SWIM

AMET Advanced MET Information

DATM Digital ATM

FICE FFICE

SWIM SWIM

Optimum Capacity & Flexible Flight –

through Global Collaborative ATM

ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance Sys

ASEP Airborne Separation

ASUR Alternative Surveillance

FRTO Free Route Operations

NOPS Network Operations

OPTL Optimum Flight Levels

SNET Ground-Based Safety Nets

Efficient Flight Paths – through

Trajectory-based Operations

CCO Continuous Climb Operations

CDO Continuous Decent Operations

RPAS Remotely Piloted Aircraft Sys.

TBO Trajectory-Based Operations

19

PIA1 Modules: Airport

Operations ACDM B0

B1

Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM

Optimized Airport Operations through Airport-CDM

APTA B0

B1

Optimization of Approach Procedures including Vertical Guidance

Optimized Airport Accessibility

RATS B1 Remotely Operated Aerodrome Control

RSEQ B0

B1

B2

B3

Improve Traffic Flow through Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

Improved Airport Operations through Departure, Surface and Arrival Management

Linked Arrival Management and Departure Management (AMAN/DNAM)

Integration AMAN/DMAN/SMAN

SURF B0

B1

B2

Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A-SMGCS Level 1-2)

Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations – SURF, SURF-IA and

Enhanced Vision Systems (EVS)

Optimized Surface Routing and Safety Benefits (A-SMGCS Level 3-4 and SVS)

WAKE B0

B1

B2

Increased Runway Throughput through Optimized Wake Turbulence Separation

Increased Runway Throughput through Dynamic Wake Turbulence Separation

Advanced Wake Turbulence Separation (Time-Based)

20

AMET B0

B1

B3

Meteorological Information Supporting Enhanced Operational Efficiency and Safety

Enhanced Operational Decisions through Integrated Meteorological Information

(Planning and Near-term Service)

Enhanced Operational Decisions through Integrated Meteorological Information (Near-

term and Immediate Service)

DATM B0

B1

Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

Service Improvement through Integration of all Digital ATM Information

FICE B0

B1

B2

B3

Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity though Ground-Ground Integration

Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Flight and Flow Information

for a Collaborative Environment Step-1 (FF-ICE/1) Application before Departure

Improved Coordination through Multi-Centre Ground-Ground Integration (FF-ICE, Step

-1 and Flight Object, SWIM)

Improved Operational Performance through the Introduction of Full FF-ICE

SWIM B1

B2

Performance Improvement through the Application of SWIM

Enabling Airborne Participation in Collaborative ATM through SWIM

Data + SWIM

PIA 2 Modules: Globally

Interoperable Systems & Data

21

ACAS B0

B2

Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems (ACAS) Improvements

New Collision Avoidance System

ASEP B0

B1

B2

Air Traffic Situational Awareness (ATSA)

Increased Capacity and Efficiency through Interval Management

Airborne Separation (ASEP)

ASUR B0 Initial Capability for Ground Surveillance

FRTO B0

B1

Improved Operations through Enhanced En-route Trajectories

Improved Operations through Optimized ATS Routing

NOPS B0

B1

B2

B3

Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide View

Enhanced Flow Performance through Network Operational Planning

Increased User Involvement in the Dynamic Utilization of the Network

Traffic Complexity Management

OPFL B0

B2

Improved Access to Optimum Flight Levels through Climb/Descent Procedures

using ADS-B

SNET B0

B1

Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets

Ground-based Safety Nets on Approach

PIA 3 Modules: Optimum

Capacity & Flexible Flight

22

CCO B0 Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Departure Profiles – Continuous Climb

Operations (CCOs)

CDO B0

B1

B2

Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles using Continuous Descent

Operations (CDOs)

Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDOs) using VNAV

Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDOs) using VNAV,

Required Speed and Time of Arrival

RPAS B1

B2

B3

Initial Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) into Non-segregated Airspace

Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Integration in Traffic

Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Transparent Management

TBO B0

B1

B3

Improved Safety and Efficiency through the Initial Application of Data Link En-

route

Improved Traffic Synchronization and Initial Trajectory-Based Operation

Full 4D Trajectory-Based Operations

PIA 4 Modules: Efficient

Flight Paths

23

Airport Operations

Globally Interoperable System & Data

Globally Collaborative ATM

Effective Flight Path

B0-WAKE

B0-SURF

B0-ACDM

B0-RSEQ

B1-SWIM

B0-FRTO

B0-NOPS

B0-ASUR

B0-ASEP

B0-SNET

B0-ACAS

B0-OPFL

B0-APTA

B0-CDO

B0-CCO

B0-TBO

B1-RATS

B0-AMET

B0-FICE

B0-DATM

B1-RPAS

B1-APTA

B1-WAKE B2-WAKE

B2-SURFB1-SURF

B1-ACDM

B3-RSEQB2-RSEQB1-RSEQ

B3-AMETB1-AMET

B3-FICEB2-FICEB1-FICE

B1-DATM

B2-SWIM

B1-FRTO

B3-NOPSB1-NOPS B2-NOPS

B1-ASEP B2-ASEP

B1-SNET

B2-ACAS

B1-CDO B2-CDO

B3-TBO

B2-RPAS B3-RPAS

Thread

Dependency

PrerequisiteModule Dependencies

B1-TBO

24

Elements: Working Document for the ASBU

1. Narrative1.1 General

1.2 Baseline

1.3 Change brought by the module

1.4+ Elements’ Descriptions

2. Intended Performance Operational

Improvement

3. Necessary Procedures (A and G)

4. Necessary System Capability

5. Human Performance

6. Regulatory/Standardization needs and

Approval Plan (A and G)

7. Implementation and demonstration

Activities

8. Reference Documents

25

Elements Identification• Initial identification is completed based on the

ASBU document

• Collaboration with NAVCANADA and ICAO

NACC Office via North American ANP

• Regions and States can add their specific

requirements as Elements

• Need to work with ICAO HQ to agree on the

definition of elements

• Creation of ASBU

Handbook – emphasis on

Elements

• ICAO North Atlantic (NAT)

has adopted the ASBU

Handbook

26

B0 and B1 Elements (as of Oct 2015)

• Based on the NAM ASBU Handbook

– Most Elements are “derived” from working document for

ASBU

• Need to work with ICAO HQ to agree on the

definition of elements

B1 PIA Modules Elements

PIA 1 6 26

PIA 2 4 16

PIA 3 4 13

PIA 4 3 14

Total 17 69

B0 PIA Modules Elements

PIA 1 5 20

PIA 2 3 18

PIA 3 7 17

PIA 4 3 8

Total 18 63

27

Sample Elements

B0 WAKE Elements1. (Defined: Element 1) New PANS-ATM wake turbulence

categories and separation minima2. (Derived from Element 2) Dependent diagonal paired

approach procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced lessthan 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart

3. (Derived from Element 3) Wake independent departure and arrival procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart

4. (Derived from Element 3) Wake turbulence mitigation for departures procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart

5. (Identified by the United States) 6 wake turbulence categories and separation minima

28

29

Did someone asked you…

B0-RSEQ

Improve Traffic flow

through Runway

Sequencing

(AMAN/DMAN)

Implementation Indicator: % of

applicable international aerodromes

having implemented AMAN / DMAN

B0-WAKE

Increased Runway

Throughput through

Optimized Wake

Turbulence Separation



having implemented increased runway

throughput through optimized wake

turbulence separation

B0-FICE

Increased Interoperability,

Efficiency and Capacity

through Ground-Ground

Integration

Implementation Indicator: % of FIRs

within which all applicable ACCs have

implemented at least one interface to use

AIDC / OLDI with neighbouring ACCs

30

How did you answer?

B0-RSEQ


through Runway

Sequencing

(AMAN/DMAN)




B0-WAKE

Increased Runway

Throughput through

Optimized Wake







B0-FICE

Increased Interoperability,


through Ground-Ground

Integration


within which all applicable ACCs have

implemented at least one interface to use

AIDC / OLDI with neighbouring ACCs

31

Definition: Modules vs Elements

• Set of airports

• For a specific airport, (Element

Definition) AMAN via controlled time of

arrival to a reference fix

B0-RSEQ


through Runway

Sequencing

(AMAN/DMAN)




32

B0-WAKE

Increased Runway

Throughput through

Optimized Wake








• Set of airports

• For a specific airport, (One Element Definition) Wake

independent departure and arrival procedures for parallel

runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500

feet) apart

• For a specific airport, (Another Element Definition) Wake

turbulence mitigation for departures procedures for parallel

runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500

feet) apart

33


• AIDC to provide initial flight data to adjacent ATSUs

• AIDC to update previously coordinated flight data

• AIDC for control transfer

• AIDC to transfer CPDLC logon information to the Next

Data Authority

B0-FICE

Increased

Interoperability,


through Ground-

Ground Integration


within which all applicable ACCs

have implemented at least one

interface to use AIDC / OLDI with

neighbouring ACCs

34

Ask Different Questions

• Do you need this capability at some

airports?

• If yes, are you in planning phase or

implementation phase?

• Did this capability implemented?

B0-RSEQ


through Runway

Sequencing

(AMAN/DMAN)

Question: % of applicable

international aerodromes having

implemented AMAN / DMAN

Element: AMAN via controlled time of arrival to a reference fix

35

Different Indicators

1. x of y Table AOP-1 airports assessed

2. z of x implementations planned

3. w of x implementations implementedWhere:

• x=the number of implementations that are assessed as “Need”

• y=the total number of Table AOP-1 aerodromes

• z=the number of needed implementations that are in Planning status

• w=the number of needed implementations that are implemented

Element: AMAN via controlled time of arrival to a

reference fix

36

ASBU Element Analysis and

Implementation Process

• Evaluate Elements one

by one– Understand environments

– Understand needs

– Understand status

– Prioritize

– Plan accordingly

• Reporting

• If fails…– Analysis Not Started

37

PIA 1

Block 0

Module

Elements

Table(with sample

checks “X”)

38

PIA 2 Block 0 Module Elements Table(with sample checks “X”)

39


40


41

The No Country Left Behind (NCLB) campaign highlights ICAO’s

efforts to assist States in implementing ICAO Standards and

Recommended Practices (SARPs). The main goal of this work is to help

ensure that SARP implementation is better harmonized globally so that

all States have access to the significant socio-economic benefits of safe

and reliable air transport.

Many “Analysis Not Started” is an indication of trouble.

42

Implementation

• Planning

• Monitoring

• Reporting

43

Air Navigation Report Form (ANRF)

• Purpose– Report the implementation status

– Report qualitative performance benefits

– Provide the progress status via web viewer

• Use the same report form for Regions and States

• One ANRF per module

• Specific focus on what will be reported

44

Qualitative Performance Benefits

5 out of 11 KPAs are selected for the ANRF

– Access/Equity

– Capacity

– Efficiency

– Environment

– Safety

ANRF provides the qualitative benefit

descriptions for each module

ICAO expects States to provide data for the

chosen metrics

45

Technology Roadmaps

1. Communication 3. Navigation 5. Avionics

• A/G Data comm • Dedicated technology • Communications

• G/G comm • Performance-based

Navigation

• Surveillance

• A/G voice comm • Navigation

2. Surveillance 4. Information

Management

• Aircraft safety nets

• Surface surveillance • SWIM • Onboard systems

• Ground-based

surveillance

• Other

• A/A Surveillance

46

Summary of ASBU and ANP

• Understand ASBU B0 Elements

• Evaluate ASBU B0 Elements

• Use ANRF to

plan/monitor/report

• State ANP

47

Put Together for your ANP

• Consider Regional eANP Volume III

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part 0 – Introduction

Part 1 – General Planning Aspects

Part 2 – Air Navigation System/ASBU

Implementation

Part 3 – Air Navigation System/Regional

Aviation System Improvement

48

Your “possible” ANP

Part 1• Analysis and

Implementation

Workflow

• Status Indicator(s)

for each ASBU

Elements

• Status Indicator(s)

for each State

specific

improvements

Part 2• Status Table for

each ASBU

Elements

Part 3• Explanation of

State specific

improvements

• Status (Table) for

each State specific

improvements

Appendix• ANRFs

49

• All Block 0 Elements are evaluated/reviewed

– Initial FAA status was shared via ICAO WP/IP in multiple regional meetings in 2014

– 47 Elements identified in 2014 status reporting (either implemented or N/A status)

– 63 Elements identified in October 2015 and all status are known (majority are implemented or N/A. A few of them are in progress.)

– Using modified Air Navigation Report Form (ANRF)

FAA Status:

ASBU Block 0 Elements Implementation

50

FAA Activities to Support ASBU

• Elements identification

• ASBU analysis and implementation process

• ANRF improvements and usage

• eANP Volume III

– NAM eANP

– NAT eANP

– Sharing information with other regions

• ASBU Workshops

– Collaboration with CAAS, JCAB, and CANSO

51

Questions?

Thank you!