Consistently Losing Elections Unions Feds Help a3856

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Consistently Losing Elections Unions Feds Help a3856

    1/2

    Ema il Address Zip

    Enter Search Terms

    By Christopher Prandoni Tuesday, January 4, 2011 2:47 pm

    Print this Page Email Page

    After Consistently Losing Elections,Unions Ask Feds for Help

    This article was originally posted at BigGovernment.com

    With public sentiment turning against organized labor, unions have enlisted obscure federal

    bureaucrats to help bolster their ranks. The Department of Labor has been busy rolling back

    transparency initiatives put in place during the last decade; the National Labor Relations Board is

    considering rules which would guarantee union organizers access to private property; the

    National Mediation Board (NMB) is easing union election rules for unions.

    Of the three agencies charged with administering different facets of labor-employer relations,

    none has been more blatantly pro-union than the NMB over the past two years. Founded in 1934,

    the National Mediation Board is charged with overseeing labor-management disputes in the

    railroad and airline industries. The three member boardcurrently comprised of two former union

    officials and a Bush holdovershowed its true colors soon after its members were assembled. In

    its first major decision, the NMB ruled that transportation unions only needed to receive a majority

    of votes cast as oppose to a majority of all workers votes for the union to be certified.

    From the unions perspective, transportation workers are ideal union members. Workers are

    required to pay union dues if they want to keep their jobright to work laws are not applicable to

    this industry. Compounding workers problems, once a transportation union is elected it is virtually

    impossible to get rid of union representation. It is so difficult under the NMBs rules that it has

    never been done in a group with more than 1000 employees. Coupled together, these policies

    make transportation workers a golden goose for unionsworkers have to pony up hard earned

    cash, indefinitely.

    This NMBs move to facilitate union organizing was thought to have huge implications in looming

    union elections. One such showdown is between Deltas flight attendants and the Association of

    Flight Attendants (AFA).

    When AFA called for an election, more then 94 percent of Delta flight attendantsnearly 19,000

    employeescast votes in what was sure to be a highly contested election. Of the 18,760 ballots

    cast, the National Mediation Board certified that 9,544 workers cast ballots for no representation,

    while 8,760 votes cast for AFA. But the NMB also counted 430 write-in votes including 189

    blank votes as votes for union representation, so the AFA officially fell short of a majority by 300

    votes.

    This was no anomaly; unions have lost seven of the seven Delta employee elections theyve

    called for. Delta's below-wing airport customer service workers, cargo warehouse employees,

    simulator technicians, meteorologists, passenger service employees, stock clerks and flight

    attendants all rejected unions at the ballot box. The simulator technicians rejected unionization

    twice.

    In two other groups, the unions voluntarily decertified without an election after it became apparent

    they couldnt get majority support. Thus, among nine groups, involving 56,000 employees, none

    has chosen to have union representation.

    Unable to persuade Delta employees on the merits of their argument, unions have run to the NMB

    crying foul play. Unions are hoping that a sympathetic board will invalidate the democratically

    conducted elections, arbitrarily penalize Delta, and then call for another election. Revealing howbaseless the unions case before the NMB is, unions have challenged Delta for encouraging voter

    participation.

    Senator Johnny Issakson (R-Ga.) and a group of 37 senators sent a letter to the National

    Mediation Board expressing similar concerns:

    While the Board Majoritys past actions with regard to the Delta-Northwest merger makes us

    question its impartiality in this case...a clear majority of voting flight attendants had to vote for no

    union representation for the AFA not to represent Delta flight attendants following the

    representation election. That is precisely the choice Delta flight attendants made.

    A similar letter from Americans for Tax Reform and nineteen other conservative groups and

    activists concludes:

    Despite the threats and bullying of the unions, it is the will of the people the will of these

    employees democratically expressed through these elections that should be honored.

    Initially unable to unionize Deltas workers, the National Mediation Board eased election rulesmoving the goal posts at the behest of Big Labor. Now, after every union couldnt persuade

    Deltas workers to elect them, unions are yet again knocking on the NMBs doors looking to avail

    themselves by superseding democratic elections. This is special interest politics at its worst

    selling out workers for politically connected groups.

    Tags: CARDCHECK, RTW, Federal

    Comments

    Card Check & TheEmployee Free Choice Act

    Collective Bargaining

    Green Jobs

    Immigration Policy

    Ind. Contractor Reform

    Minimum Wage

    Paycheck Protection

    Pension Reform

    Prevailing Wage

    Privatization

    Regulatory Reform

    Right to WorkUnion Transparency

  • 8/13/2019 Consistently Losing Elections Unions Feds Help a3856

    2/2

    00 ccoommmmeennttss

    AALLSSOO OONNAALLLLIIAANNCCEE FFOORR WWOORRKKEERR FFRREEEEDDOOMM

    TThhee RReevveennggee ooff tthhee NNLLRRBB PPaarrtt IIII

    1 comment a year ago

    BBoobb Defund the NLRB and

    actively pursue right to work

    legislation.

    MMiicchhiiggaann WWeellccoommeess RRiigghhtt ttoo WWoorrkk

    3 comments a year ago

    GGoollffeerrgguuyy4499220022 I am a public

    employee, and I have no retirement

    benefits, so spread your anti middle

    MMaacckkiinnaacc CCeenntteerr UUnnvveeiillss RRiigghhtt--

    ttoo--WWoorrkk SSiittee

    1 comment 9 months ago

    ttbbssssiicc Why is it,,,, that right to

    work,,,,,, ALWAYS means,,,, right to

    work for LESS?????

    NNLLRRBB AAppppooiinnttmmeennttss RRuulleedd

    UUnnccoonnssttiittuuttiioonnaall

    1 comment 11 months ago

    11aallpphhaannuummeerriicc44660000 Have you

    heard? Obama is just ignoring the

    court ruling, and is keeping his

    BBeesstt LLooggiinn

    00

    AWF is a special project ofAmericans for Tax Reformdedicated to combating anti-worker

    legislation and promoting free and open markets.

    Photo Credits | Sitemap

    Website Design and Development by Braynard Group, Inc.