Upload
joel-hardy
View
222
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Construction & Distortion of
Memories
[This page is intentionally left blank.]
Memory and Gist
Gist ~ theme ~ schema ~ expectation Fuzzily defined, not identical, but clearly related
Memory is designed to operate on gist, it can function without gist (as Ebbinghaus showed), but gist is what it does best.
We think of memory as a series of processes (encoding, organizing, storing, retrieving, etc.) and gist influences every stage.
Memory and Gist
Bransford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1973) reasoned that, if memories are the sum of experience and knowledge, then it is possible that a person first comprehends an input and then elaborates on it. If this is true, then people should remember text equally well if relevant knowledge is unavailable.
Memory and Gist
They told S’s to listen carefully and try to understand a passage, and that they would be asked for immediate recall. They manipulated the availability of the relevant information by showing (or not) the cartoon for 30 seconds prior to hearing the passage. Comprehension ratings were gathered as a manipulation check to determine whether this effected the ability to extract gist. The manipulation worked: those shown the cartoon understood more and remembered more.
Memory and Gist
Isn’t it possible that people remembered more simply because they had more opportunities to encode the material (with a picture vs. no picture)?
A series of replications were run to eliminate other possibilities. A second no context group got to hear the passage twice in a row. An after group was shown the cartoon after having heard the passage. A partial context group was shown a related picture.
Memory and Gist
Memory and Gist
Mean Comprehension Ratings and Mean Number of Ideas Recalled
No No Contxt Partial Contxt Contxt1 Contxt2 After Contxt Before
Comprehension 2.30 3.60 3.30 3.70 6.10Recall 3.60 3.80 3.60 4.00 8.00
The mean comprehension ratings and mean number of ideas recalled correlate highly. (r=0.94)
Memory and Gist
In a subsequent replication an additional factor was added, free recall vs. cued recall.
Mean Number of Ideas Recalled (Balloon Passage)
No Contxt Contxt After Cntxt Before
No Cue 3.92 4.33 7.33Key Word Cues 4.00 3.75 8.50
The cues don’t make much difference for the non-comprehending groups, because most of the information just isn’t there to be retrieved.
Memory and Gist
The moral of the story is that gist drives encoding.
Memory and Gist
Memory and Gist
Brewer & Treyens (1981) created a false “graduate student office”, containing 61 objects designed to vary along two dimensions:
more or less noticeable in the room (saliency) more or less likely to exist in a GSO (schema-expectancy).
Had two groups of subjects rate the objects in the office (one group for each scale) and 70 additional objects that were not present in the office.
Saliency and schema-expectancy correlated -.41 for present objects and -.69 for lures.
Memory and Gist
S’s were asked to wait in the room for 35 seconds, then taken to a plain room and told about the experiment. S’s were split into three groups that were given different memory tasks: written recall, drawing recall on provided outlines, and recognition. The frequencies with which objects were listed in the recall tasks was tabulated. Correlation between the two recall measures was .94.
Memory and Gist
Partl Cors b/t Recall Freq & Schema Expectancy & Saliency SE Sal
Written Recall Frequency .55 .64Drawing Recall Frequency .68 .66
Partl Cors b/t Mean Recognition & SE & Sal (recognzd items)SE Sal
Present Object Recognition .58 .69Absent Object Recognition .52 -.36
Memory and Gist
Both things that we expect to see and those that, for whatever reason, we are surprised to see (that stand out) tend to get noticed and remembered. This was supported by qualitative analyses. The study demonstrates expectancy congruent and expectancy incongruent encoding.
But only things we expect lead to intrusions (expectancy congruent distortion on retrieval).
Memory and Gist
Some S’s performed both recall and recognition, so Brewer & Treyens created a retrieval ratio by dividing the number who recalled an object by the number that gave it the top recognition rating. This ratio doesn’t correlate significantly with saliency, but partial correlation between retrieval ratio and SE was .56.
This shows that the schema (the gist) facilitates retrieval.
Similar results found by Hastie & Kumar (1979): inconsistent highest, consistent high, neutral lowest, p.166 in Kunda.
Memory and Gist
Owens, J., Bower, G. H., & Black, J. B. (1979) had S’s read passage first day and estimated time. P group estimated significantly less reading time, despite
having read more. Recalled as much as possible the next day.
P group remembers more episodes, more often in the right order, more propositions, but also more intrusions (false alarms).
Then cued with titles of episodes for additional recall. C group remembers more and more accurately.
Memory and Gist
Recall Measures for Prblm and Cntrl Conditions Before & After Cuing
Scripts Props New Props Total PropsCondition Recalled* Recalled* Intruded** Recalled
B/f Cue Problem 3.67 29.24 15.20 44.44Control 2.50 20.24 3.76 24.00
A/f Cue Problem 4.56 38.44 17.56 56.00Control 4.75 54.63 8.88 63.51
* Out of 5 **Out of 190
Memory and Gist
Then test for recognition using true propositions, and lures of various types, using 7 point Likert scale ratings.
C group more accurate on trues, and P group less accurate on motive relevant lures.
Lesson: a theme (or gist) organizes memories and facilitates retrieval. Episodes that lack gist are not necessarily gone, but are disorganized and very difficult to retrieve.
Memory and Gist
Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978) wanted to investigate whether storage processes are distinct from retrieval processes.
Memory and Gist
Created a story about two boys staying home and playing hooky. The story contained information about the house that would be pertinent to a prospective homebuyer or a burglar. The ideas relevant to each were assessed in advance with ratings.
S’s were told to read the story from one of the two perspectives. They performed a distracter task for 12 minutes, and were asked to recall as much of the story as they could. S’s then performed a second distracter task, and were asked to recall the story again, but this time from the other perspective.
Memory and Gist
Proportion of Idea Units Recalled a Function of Perspective
Burglar Homebuyer ---------------------- ---------------------
1st/2nd Perspctve 1st Recl 2nd Recl 1st Recl 2nd Recl
Homebuyer/burglar .51 .61 .59 .48Burglar/homebuyer .68 .36 .40 .50
What’s important here is that on the second recall S’s remembered more ideas relevant to the new perspective than they had initially. Interviews after the experiment supported this result.
Memory and Gist
The big idea is that a theme can organize memories and facilitate recall even if introduced after the memory has been encoded (i.e. independently of encoding and storage).
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias
First, an memory test
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Well, how did you all do? Any false positives? Kunda (ch 4) discusses that we often
mistake the memory for something we imagined for something that actually happened.
As imagined events become more rich, we become more likely to mistake them for real events.
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Roediger & McDermitt (2000) The words on the list activated their
central theme. The central theme is strongly remember,
although it was not presented. Was the central theme explicitly or
implicitly activated? There are data to suggest it was explicitly
activated, what do you think?
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Alzheimer’s patients are much worse at
recalling words in list, but their false positive rate is the same as healthy adults.
Does anyone know other examples of people with memory loss who maintain their ability to encode and retrieve central themes but lose the periphery?
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Kunda also discusses stereotype driven
inferences as a source of source amnesia. People here that “the lawyer is standing in
front of her house.” Later, people report that they
remembered hearing about a mansion.
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias People may confuse where there heard
something when the two potential sources are seen as similar to each other, i.e. confusing which of the two female justices.
Dimensions that cause us to categorize change depending on our theories of the world.
One’s dress only lead to source monitoring problems when that dimension was important, i.e. when deciding if someone should be a media rep.
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Hard to reconstruct passed predictions
after the event occurs. Monday Morning Quarterbacks. When we retrieve info we reconstruct
using current knowledge, cannot escape this.
People estimate that others who do not know the result will predict the result because it is obvious.
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Mather, Shafir, and Johnson (2000) Relates to Source Monitoring and
Hindsight Bias (a little). When remembering past choices, people
engage in choice supportive memory distortion.
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Choose what roommate you would prefer
between two people with positive and negative features.
After choice, subjects see list of features and say whether the feature went with roommate A, B, or it’s new.
Some of the positive features of B are misattributed to A (fewer negative features are misattributed).
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias When did misattribution occur? At first encoding causing one choice to
seem better causing the choice? When the choice was made to ensure later
remembering congruent with a good self image?
At the time of source monitoring? Positive new features misattributed to A,
at least some happened at final stage.
Source Amnesia, Source Monitoring and The Hindsight Bias Why are we designed to err? Flexibility, powerful inductive abilities and
maintaining a good self-image has it’s price: maintaining stereotypes, etc.
Are you happy with your memory system?
Eyewitness TestimonyPROS CONS
Eyewitness TestimonyPROS CONS
Ecologically valid researchLowers false conviction rates
Eyewitness TestimonyPROS CONS
AgePerson perceptionEmotional interferenceConfidence in confidenceSource amnesiaMisinformation effect
Eyewitness Testimony
Misinformation Effect
Overwriting Interference
Eyewitness Testimony PROS CONS
Ecologically valid researchLowers false conviction rates
AgePerson perceptionEmotional interferenceConfidence in confidenceSource amnesiaMisinformation effect
Eyewitness Testimony
If we suck so bad at it, …
should we ditch it?