Construction of Portfolio

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    1/20

    CONSTRUCTION OF

    OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO

    Submitted by:-Pankaj Rathor

    Nitin Agrawal

    Malav Pariekh

    Devendra Rajput

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    2/20

    Flow of presentation

    Portfolio

    Investment & factor affecting investment

    Portfolio management theory Utility score

    Optimal Risky Portfolios

    Sharp ratio

    Risk & Return of various Risky assets

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    3/20

    Portfolio

    portfolio refers to any collection of financial

    assets such as stocks, bonds and cash.

    Portfolios may be held by individual investors

    and/or managed by financial professionals,

    hedge funds, banks and other financial

    institutions.

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    4/20

    Investment

    An investment is an exposure of cash that has

    the objective of producing cash inflows in the

    future.

    In finance, investment means buying

    securities or other monetary or paper

    (financial) assets in the money markets or

    capital markets.

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    5/20

    factor affecting investment

    Risk

    Return

    Liquidity Taxation

    Inflation

    Term Timing

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    6/20

    Portfolio management theory

    maximize portfolio expected return for a givenamount of portfolio risk

    Harry Markowitz introduced PMT in a 1952

    article and a 1959 book Portfolio theory also assumes that investors

    are risk averse, meaning that; Given a choice

    between two assets with equal rates of return,most investors will select the asset with thelower level of risk.

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    7/20

    Utility Score

    Utility Score = Expected Return 0.005A2

    Utility Score Shows that:-

    Return for Risk taker

    Return for Risk Aversion

    Harry Markowitz introduced in 1960

    If utility score for particular security is less

    than risk free rate than money should not be

    invested in that security

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    8/20

    Optimal Risky Portfolios

    OP is the one which give maximum return for

    a given level of risk or minimum risk for a

    given level of return

    Portfolios of Two Risky Assets

    Portfolio of two risky assets and one risk-free

    asset

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    9/20

    Sharp Ratio

    The Sharpe ratio is a measure of the excess

    return (or risk premium) per unit of deviation

    in an investment asset

    The higher the Sharpe ratio number the better

    In 1966, William Forsyth Sharpe developed

    what is now known as the Sharpe ratio

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    10/20

    Risk & Return of various assets

    Gold

    Nifty

    Crude FIPP

    T-Bill

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    11/20

    Year Observation Return % xi-x xi-x^2

    1999 278.98

    2000 279.11 0.046598 -13.7721 189.6705

    2001 271.04 -2.89133 -16.71 279.2249

    2002 309.73 14.27465 0.455954 0.207895

    2003 363.38 17.32154 3.502847 12.26994

    2004 409.72 12.75249 -1.0662 1.136784

    2005 444.74 8.547301 -5.27139 27.78756

    2006 603.46 35.68827 21.86958 478.2784

    2007 695.39 15.23382 1.415127 2.002584

    2008 871.96 25.39151 11.57282 133.9301

    2009972.35 11.51314 -2.30555 5.315554

    2010 1109.72 14.12763 0.308938 0.095442

    Total = 152.0056 112.992

    x = 13.81869

    Risk=

    10.62977

    Gold

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    12/20

    Year Observation Return % xi-x xi-x^2

    2000 - -31.89 -62.8227 3946.695

    2001 - -5.44 -36.3727 1322.975

    2002 - 19.36 -11.5727 133.928

    2003 - 107.27 76.33727 5827.379

    2004 - 27.15 -3.78273 14.30903

    2005 - 47.61 16.67727 278.1314

    2006 - 49.36 18.42727 339.5644

    2007 - 54.9 23.96727 574.4302

    2008 - -47.71 -78.6427 6184.679

    2009 - 73.1 42.16727 1778.079

    2010 - 46.55 15.61727 243.8992

    Total = 340.26 2064.407

    x = 30.93273

    Risk = 45.43574

    FIPP

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    13/20

    1999 992.45

    2000 1654.8 66.73888 43.954 1931.954

    2001 1351.4 -18.3345 -41.1194 1690.807

    2002 1142.05 -15.4913 -38.2762 1465.069

    2003 1063.4 -6.88674 -29.6716 880.4051

    2004 1800.3 69.2966 46.51171 2163.339

    2005 2103.25 16.82775 -5.95713 35.48742

    2006 3074.7 46.18804 23.40316 547.7079

    2007 3745.3 21.81026 -0.97462 0.949893

    2008 5223.5 39.46813 16.68325 278.3309

    2009 2763.65 -47.092 -69.8769 4882.777

    2010 4922.3 78.10866 55.32378 3060.72

    Total = 250.6337 1693.755

    x = 22.78488

    Risk = 41.15525

    Nifty

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    14/20

    Year Observation in $ Return % xi-x xi-x^2

    1999 16.55

    2000 27.4 65.55891 47.62022 2267.685

    2001 23 -16.0584 -33.9971 1155.802

    2002 22.81 -0.82609 -18.7648 352.1171

    2003 27.69 21.39413 3.455428 11.93998

    2004 37.41 35.10293 17.16423 294.6107

    2005 49.81 33.14622 15.20752 231.2687

    2006 58.3 17.04477 -0.89393 0.799105

    2007 64.2 10.12007 -7.81863 61.13095

    2008 91.48 42.49221 24.55351 602.8751

    2009 53.48 -41.5391 -59.4778 3537.6122010 70 30.89005 12.95136 167.7376

    Total = 197.3257 868.3579

    x = 17.9387

    Risk = 29.46791

    Crude

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    15/20

    Year Observation in $ Return % xi-x xi-x^2

    1999 0 10.61952000 0 9.553 2.999873 8.999236

    2001 0 8.932 2.378873 5.659035

    2002 0 6.372 -0.18113 0.032807

    2003 0 5.719 -0.83413 0.695768

    2004 0 4.384 -2.16913 4.7051132005 0 5.619 -0.93413 0.872594

    2006 0 6.769 0.215873 0.046601

    2007 0 7.652 1.098873 1.207521

    2008 0 7.5128 0.959673 0.920972

    2009 0 4.6042 -1.94893 3.798318

    2010 0 4.9674 -1.58573 2.514531

    Total = 72.0844 2.94525

    x = 6.553127

    Risk = 1.716173

    T-Bills

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    16/20

    UTILITY SCORE FOR SINGLE INVESTMENT

    Us= E(r)-0.005*A*stdev^2s Rf = 6.55%

    Risk Aversion (A) is assumed to be moderate i.e. 3.

    Asset R(s) V(s) U(s) result

    GOLD 13.82 112.997 12.12505 invest

    FTPP30.93 2064.794 -0.04191 no

    CRUDE 17.94 868.48 4.9128 no

    NIFTY 22.79 1694.146 -2.62219 no

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    17/20

    Portfolio R(p) R(f) stdev(p)

    Slope of

    portfolio

    (p)

    GOLD & NIFTY 14.726 6.55 10.31 0.793016

    GOLD & FTPP 16.164 6.55 10.48 0.917366

    GOLD & CRUDE 14.726 6.55 8.69 0.940852

    NIFTY & FTPP 25.966 6.55 20.34 0.954572

    CRUDE & FTPP 23.475 6.55 3.79 4.465699

    CRUDE & NIFTY 20.229 6.55 27.28 0.50143

    Sharpe Ratio

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    18/20

    Conclusion

    Analysing the single security investment with thehelp of Utility Score model we can say that onlyGOLD gives positive return over prevailing riskfree rates of 10 years. Thus if we want to invest in

    a single security we should invest in GOLD ratherthan any other securities.

    From the derived correlations of portfolio we canconclude that portfolio of NIFTY-CRUDE is most

    effectively correlated. While portfolios likeCRUDE-FIPP & NIFTY-FIPP is negatively correlatedthus we should not go for these portfolios.

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    19/20

    Conclusion

    Reward to variability of portfolio CRUDE FIPP

    is highest thus we should go for these

    portfolio as it is the optimum portfolio. The

    slope of these portfolio derived is highest onCapital allocation line.

  • 8/2/2019 Construction of Portfolio

    20/20

    THANK YOU