13
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Multiple Rates of Return Problem Lecture No. 26 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2006

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Multiple Rates of Return Problem Lecture No. 26 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Multiple Rates of Return Problem

Lecture No. 26Chapter 7Contemporary Engineering EconomicsCopyright © 2006

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Net Investment Test

What it is: A process to determine whether or not a firm borrows money from a project during the investment period.

How to test: A project is said to be a net investment when the project balances computed at the project’s i* values, PB(i*)n, are either less than or equal to zero throughout the life of the investment.

Meaning: The investment is net in the sense that the firm does not overdraw on its return any point and hence is not indebted to the project

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Pure Investment

Definition: An investment in which a firm never borrows money from the project.

How to Determine: If the project passes the net investment test, it is a pure investment.

Relationship: A simple investment is always a pure investment.

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Mixed Investment

Definition: An investment in which a firm borrows money from the project during the investment period

How to determine: If a project fails the net investment test, it is a mixed investment.

Relationship: If a project is a mixed investment, it is a nonsimple investment. (However, we can’t say that a nonsimple investment is also a mixed investment.)

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Example 7.6 Pure versus Mixed Investments

n

Project Cash Flows

A B C D

0

1

2

3

-$1,000

1,000

2,000

1,500

-$1,000

1,600

-300

-200

-$1,000

500

-500

2,000

-$1,000

3,900

-5,030

2,145

i* 33.64% 21.95% 29.95% (10%,30%,50%)

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Sample Calculation – Net Investment Test (Project B)

(-, +, +, 0) Mixed investment

Use 21.95% as an interest rate to find the project balances

0200$)2195.01(02.164$%)95.21(

02.164$300$)2195.01(5.380$%)95.21(

5.380$1600$)2195.01(1000$%)95.21(

1000$%)95.21(

3

2

1

0

PB

PB

PB

PB

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Net investment test (Example 7.6)

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Multiple Rates of Return Problem

• Find the rate(s) of return:

2

$2,300 $1,320( ) $1,000

1 (1 )

0

PW ii i

$1,000

$2,300

$1,320

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Let Then,

Solving for yields,

or

Solving for yields

or 20%

xi

PW ii i

x x

x

x x

i

i

1

1

000300

1

320

1

000 300 320

0

10 11 10 12

10%

2

2

.

( ) $1,$2,

( )

$1,

( )

$1, $2, $1,

/ /

Analytical Solution:

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

PW Plot for a Nonsimple Investment with Multiple Rates of Return

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

n = 0 n = 1 n = 2

Beg. Balance

Interest Charged

Payment -$1,000

-$1,000

-$200

+$2,300

+$1,100

+$220

-$1,320

Ending Balance -$1,000 +$1,100 $0

Use either i* =20% or 10%

Cash borrowed (released) from the project is assumed toearn the same interest rate through external investmentas money that remains internally invested a mixed investment

Fail the Net Investment Test

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

Can the firm be able to invest the money released from the project at 20% externally in Period 1?

• If the firm’s MARR is exactly 20%, the answer is “yes”, because it represents the rate at which the firm can always invest the money in its investment pool. Then, the 20% is also true IRR for the project..• Suppose the firm’s MARR is 15% instead of 20%. The assumption used in calculating i* is no longer valid. In order to calculate i*, we assumed that all cash released from the project can be invested at the i* instead of MARR.

• Conclusion: Neither 10% nor 20% is a true IRR.

Conceptual Issue:

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4th edition, © 2007

If NPW criterion is used at MARR = 15%

PW(15%) = -$1,000 + $2,300 (P/F, 15%, 1)

- $1,320 (P/F, 15%, 2 )

= $1.89 > 0

Accept the investment

• If you encounter multiple rates of return, abandon the IRR analysis and use the PW criterion.

• If you want to find the true rate of return (or return on invested capital) to the project, follow the procedure outlined in Section 7.3.4.

How to Proceed: