View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CONTENT
1) Summery of papers2) Conclusion of papers3) Critique of papers4) From perspective of AID receiving country5) From perspective of AID sending country6) Conclusion of presentation
Good policies• Fiscal – Budget surplus• Monetary – Low inflation• Trade – Opennes
• AID can fill the financial GAP (Saving), there for it will be investment, then economic growth.
• Sachs and Warner 1995
Summary of papers
Aid, Policies and Growth Does Aid has an impact on growth?
Do donors favor good policy? On average AID has little impact on
growth Positive impact on countries with good
fiscal, monetary and trade policies No significant tendancy for favor of good
policy Trend towards better policy among poor
countriesCraig Burnside and David Dollar
On the Empirics of the Foreign Aid and Growth
Significant growth in aid per capita Positive impact on countries with
good policies
Carl-Johan Dalgaard, Henrik Hansen and Finn Tarp
AID instability as measure of the uncertainty and the positive impact of
AID on growth Is uncertainty of Aid inflow
important?
Stability of Aid flow is important• Effects the level of investment
Could constrain policy Effects fiscal behavior
Robert Lensink and Oliver Morrissey
Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth
Good policy is insignificant factorIntroduction of Alternative good
policy Black market premiumM2/GDPInsignificant
William Easterly
Conclusion
• Aid investment growth theory is in fact important and sound very good.
• But empirically there is a little proof.
Critique
• Good Policy?–Normative Statement v.s. Positive
Statement
• Aid is positively correlated to economic growth.– Positive Statement
• Budget surplus, low inflation, and openness are good policies.–Normative Statement
Critique
• Is a policy same in different countries?– Japan v.s. Costa Rica
JapanConstitution: no military7th “military” expenditure
Costa RicaConstitution: no military “0” expenditure for military Border Guards (Police?)
Source: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Critique
• Development of Nation = Nation Building?–Marshall Plan (Europe)• George Marshall, U.S. Secretary of State
1. Long-term support from outside– Steadily, Politically and financially
2. Strong leadership from inside
Haiti
Haiti’s development– Jeffery Sachs, Special Adviser to S.G. of
U.N.• Haiti’s recovery has to start now.• Reconstruction: Big money!!
– Dominique Strauss-Kahn, IMF Managing Director• 1. “Nation has to be on driver’s seat.”• 2. “need long-term commitment from
outside.”
Critique
• How do we know aid receiving countries are doing their best?
• Four possible scenarios (Game Theory?)
Critique
• In summary…• Good policies are not universal for
everyone.• Policy effects differ from country to
country.– Cultural factor?
• If the country actually grow, it will lose aid
(free money?). Aid addiction?
Help to Georgia from 94 to 2003
as Loan/Grant
• USAID projects in Geogia – 2.3 Billion USD
• EU – 800 Million USD• Other Countries - 940 Million USD
Georgian department of Statistics
• USAID projects in Geogia – 1.2 Billion USD
• EU – 1,4 Billion USD• Other Countries - 760 Million USD
JUST in 2008-2010 Georgia received and will receive
(main aim of AID is to help Georgia rebuild infrastructure and reserves, destroyer after
war with Russia in August 2008)
750 Million (IMF)500 Million (EU)
1 Billion (US)TOTAL: 2,25 Billion USD
Georgian department of Statistics
Small Conclusion about Georgia• Financial AID received by the country in 90s and
00s is significant but the effectivness of the AID is very different.
• The main reason of Economic grow supported by international AID in last years was good management (even tho it is not the best one) we have significant changes in standarts of living and economic growth in whole country.
• Georig is very good example of
Aid Receiving Country
• Which country is this?– Two US officials on an aid mission, in 1950,
said this country would have trouble competing on world market.
– The US Secretary of State, in 1954, held up a cheap shirt from this country as evidence how far they were behind.
– An Australian expert said workers in this country were easygoing and impossible to change.
– The World Bank’s largest single borrower from 1953 to 1966.
Source: Gurrerro
Aid Receiving Country (Japan)
• In case of Japan…– Cultural factor• Education• Work ethics (?)• Social Goals
– Three Things you have to have ( 三種の神器 )» TV, refrigerator, washing machine (1950’s)» 3C: Color TV, Air Conditioner, Car (1960’s)» Digital camera, DVD recorder, flat-screen TV» Personal computer, cell phone, Play Station
Aid Receiving Country (Japan)
• Can you measure cultural factor?• Can you model cultural factor?–May predict no education because no
facility
• What you receive v.s. How you receive
Aid Sending Country (Japan)
• ODA to Poland…– Ended in 2007 due to out of Development
Assistance Committee (DAC) list in 2005– Loan: Total $ 213 million– Grant: Total $ 40 million– Technological Support: Total $ 90 million
• Last grant made in 2003 was for…
Source: Minister of Foreign Affairs
Aid Sending Country
• Official Development Aid (ODA) in 2007–U.S. $ 22 billion– Japan $ 13 billion– Germany $12 billion– Poland $ 363 million• China (People’s Republic of)… $0 million• China (Republic of)… $ 516 million
Source: OECD 2008; adjusted to 2006 price and exchange rate
Aid Sending Country (Japan)
• ODA to China…– Built Beijing Airport ($ 300 million)– Built Shanghai Airport ($ 400 million)– Loan: Total $ 21 billion• Paid back: only $ 9 billion
– Grant: Total $ 1.4 billion– Tech. Support: Total $ 1.4 billion
Source: Minister of Foreign Affairs
Aid Sending Country
• World Bank Contributors–U.S. $39 billion (22%)– Japan $34 billion (20%)– Germany $20 billion (11%)
– Poland $86 million (0.05%)– China $0 million (0.00%)
Source: World Bank
World Bank Loan
• China– Lend: $37 billion– Repaid: $16 billion– Obligation: $22 billion
• Africa– Lend: $31 billion– Repaid: $0– Obligation: $10 billion
Source: World Bank
Conclusion
• There is something you can measure by numbers; there is also you cannot measure by numbers.
• Aid from outside can help economic growth of developing countries in certain extent.
• But, economic growth is depending on people inside of the countries.
Lastly…
“If you give a person a fish, he can eat a day. But, if you teach the person how to fish, he can eat forever.”
unknown