Upload
tara
View
50
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Continious emission vs sharp freeze-out: results of hydro-kinetic approach for A+A collisions. Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev. Based on : Akkelin, Hama, Karpenko, and Yu.S - PRC 78 (2008) 034906. “Soft Physics” measurements. A. x. Landau, 1953. t. Δω K. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Continious emission vs sharp freeze-out:results of hydro-kinetic approach for A+A
collisions
Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev
Krakow 11-14 June WPCF-2008
Based on: Akkelin, Hama, Karpenko, and Yu.S - PRC 78
(2008) 034906
“Soft Physics” measurements
2
xt
A
A
ΔωK
p=(p1+ p2)/2
q= p1- p2
(QS) Correlation function
Space-time structure of the matter evolution, e.g.,
Cooper-Frye prescription (1974)
Landau, 1953
Continuous Emissiont
x
outt
F. Grassi, Y. Hama, T. Kodama (1995)
“The back reaction of the emission on the fluid dynamics is not reduced just to energy-momen-tum recoiling of emitted particles on the expan-ding thermal medium, but also leads to a re-arrangement of the medium, producing a devia-tion of its state from the local equilibrium, ac-companied by changing of the local temperature, densities, and collective velocity field. This complex effect is mainly a consequence of the fact that the evolution of the single finite system of hadrons cannot be split into the two compo-nents: expansion of the interacting locally equi-librated medium and a free stream of emitted particles, which the system consists of. Such a splitting, accounting only for the momentum-energy conservation law, contradicts the unde-rlying dynamical equations such as a Boltzmann one.”
Akkelin, Hama, Karpenko, Yu.SPRC 78 034906 (2008)
Hybrid models: HYDRO + UrQMD (Bass, Dumitru (2000))
t
z
t
r
constrconstzt
at : 22
hadr 0zat )(:hadr r
The problems: the system just after hadronization is not so dilute to apply
hadronic cascade models; hadronization hypersurface contains non-space-like
sectors (causality problem: Bugaev, PRL 90, 252301, 2003); hadronization happens in fairly wide 4D-region, not just at
hypersurface , especially in crossover scenario.
)(r
t
HYDRO
UrQMD
UrQMD
hadr
hadrhadr
The initial conditions for hadronic cascade models should be based on non-local equilibrium distributions
Yu.S. , Akkelin, Hama: PRL 89 , 052301 (2002); + Karpenko: PRC 78, 034906 (2008).
Hydro-kinetic approach
MODEL• is based on relaxation time approximation for relativistic finite expanding system;
• provides evaluation of escape probabilities and deviations (even strong) of distribution functions [DF] from local equilibrium;
3. accounts for conservation laws at the particle emission;
Complete algorithm includes: • solution of equations of ideal hydro;• calculation of non-equilibrium DF and emission function in first approximation;• solution of equations for ideal hydro with non-zero left-hand-side that accounts for conservation laws for non-equilibrium process of the system which radiated free particles during expansion;• Calculation of “exact” DF and emission function; • Evaluation of spectra and correlations.
6
and are G(ain), L(oss) terms for p. species
Boltzmann eqs (differential form)
Escape probability(for each component )
Boltzmann equations and Escape probabilities
7
Boltzmann eqs (integral form)
Spectra and Emission function
Index is omittedeverywhere
Spectrum
Method of solution (Yu.S. et al, PRL, 2002)
Relaxation time approximation ( increases with time!):
8
is related to local rest system where collective veloc.
Representations of non-loc.eq. distribution function
9
If at the initial (thermalization) time
Energy-momentum conservation:
10
Iteration procedure:
I. Solution of perfect hydro equations with given initial conditions
11
II. Decomposition of energy-momentum tensor
Kiev, June 18-22 WRNP-2007
12
13
where
III. Ideal hydro with “source” instead of non-ideal hydro
(known function)
IV Final distribution function:
14
This approach accounts for conservation laws deviations from loc. eq. viscosity effects in hadron gas:
Saddle point approximation
Emission density
Spectrum
where
Normalization condition
Eqs for saddle point :
Physical conditions at
Cooper-Frye prescription
Spectrum in new variables
Emission density in saddle point representationTemporal width of emission
Generalized Cooper-Frye f-la
Generalized Cooper-Frye prescription:
17
r
t
0
Escape probability
Yu.S. (1987)-particle flow conservation; K.A. Bugaev (1996) (current form)
OPACITY
Toy model: one-component pion gas with initial T= 320 MeV at and different cross-sections.
Momentum dependence of freeze-out
Here and further for Pb+Pb collisions we use:initial energy density
EoS from Lattice QCD when T< 160 MeV, and EoS of chemically frozen hadron gas with 359 particle species at T< 160 MeV.
Pt-integrated
Conditions for the utilization of the generalized Cooper-Frye prescription
i) For each momentum p, there is a region of r where the emission function has a
sharp maximum with temporal width .
ii) The width of the maximum, which is just the relaxation time ( inverse of collision rate), should be smaller than the corresponding temporal homogeneity length of the distribution function: iii) The contribution to the spectra from the residual region of r where the saddle point method is violated does not affect essentially the particle momentum spectrum.
Then the momentum spectra can be presented in Cooper-Frye form despite it is, in fact, not sadden freeze-out and the decaying region has a finite temporal width . Such a generalized Cooper-Frye representation is related to freeze-out hypersurface of maximal emission that depends on momentum p and does not necessarily encloses the initially dense matter.
iiii) The escape probabilities for particles to be liberated just from the initial hyper-surface t0 are small almost in the whole spacial region (except peripheral points)
Pt dependence of emission density
Transverse Spectra
Max at Pt = 0.3 GeV/c
Max at Pt = 1.2 GeV/c
Initial Conditions and Emission Function
Initial profile: Gaussian
Initial profile: Woods-Saxon
1st order ph. tr.
CrossoverCrossover
W/0 initial flow With initial flow
Conclusions
• The following factors reduces space-time scales of the emission
developing of initial flows at early pre-thermal stage;
more hard transition EoS, corresponding to cross-over;
non-flat initial (energy) density distributions, similar to Gaussian;
early (as compare to standard CF-prescription) emission of hadrons, because escape probability account for whole particle trajectory in rapidly expanding
surrounding (no mean-free pass criterion for freeze-out)
• The hydrokinetic approach to A+A collisions is proposed. It allows one to describe the continuous particle emission from a hot and dense finite system, expanding hydrodynamically into vacuum, in the way which is consistent with Boltzmann equations and conservation laws, and accounts also for the opacity effects.
24
The CFp might be applied only in a generalized form, accounting for thedirect momentum dependence of the freeze-out hypersurface corresponding to the maximum of the emission function at fixed momentum p in an appropriate region of r.