Continuous Continuous Improvement Improvement

UpdateUpdate

Continuous Continuous Improvement Improvement

UpdateUpdateJune 11, 2007June 11, 2007

(Your School/Department’s Mission Statement Here)

(Your School/Department’s SMART Goals Here)

Hoover School Improvement Plan 2006-2007

Excellence for All

The mission of the Hoover community is to develop life-long learners and responsible citizens through continuous

improvement and excellence for all.

Customer Satisfaction Data-Driven Decisions

Learning for All Teamwork

Visionary Leadership

Reading Comprehension During the 2006-2007 school year the number of K-5 students at Hoover who improve their reading comprehension skills will increase by 5% in each grade level as measured by the District Benchmark Reading Assessments (LAPO & ERA). Math Computation During the 2006-2007 school year, the percentage of students scoring in the high and intermediate proficiency levels will increase in math computation at Hoover Elementary as measured by the district math assessments and the ITBS. Social, Emotional, Behavioral- School Climate During the 2006-2007 school year, Hoover students in grade 2-5 will increase their level of student respect based on the Hoover student satisfaction survey.

Continuous Improvement

VISION

HOOVER MISSION

CORE VALUES

HOOVER SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GOALS

GUIDING PHILOSOPHY

Increase % of staff implementing practices of the 4 Quality Levels

Scorecard Measure # 3.D.

Continuous Improvement

Self-Assessment

Deployment Survey April 2007All Schools - Classroom Teachers

Average Response

0

1

2

3

4

Distric

t Miss

ion

Core

Value

s

Class

room

Miss

ion

Stude

nt M

ission

Groun

d Rul

es

Goals

Class

room

Goals

Stude

nt

Celeb

rate

Goa

ls

Compa

rativ

e Dat

a

Data

Cente

r

Feed

back

Cla

ssro

om

Data

Fold

ers

Class

Mee

tings

PDSA C

lass

room

Qtools Cla

ssro

om

Qtools Stu

dent

Stand

ardi

ze P

roce

sses

Qualit

y W

ork

Std L

ed

Elementary

Middle

High

0 = Not Present

1 = No, Thinking about it

2 = Yes, Beginning

Stages

4 = Yes, Completely

Implemented

3 = Yes, Almost

completely

82.4%

58.8% 56.5%

19.1%

58.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

DistrictMission

Core Values ClassroomMission

StudentMission

GroundRules

Deployment Survey April 2007Mission, Vision & Alignment

All Schools

Yes-Completely Implemented

Yes-Almost complete

Yes-Beginning stages

No-Thinking about it

No-Not present

16.1%

36.9%

17.1%

33.3%

10.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

ComparativeData

Data Center Feedback Classroom

Data Folders ClassMeetings

Deployment Survey April 2007Data & Feedback

All SchoolsYes-Completely Implemented

Yes-Almost complete

Yes-Beginning stages

No-Thinking about it

No-Not present

FindingsStrengths

• Mission, Vision & Core Values

• Ground Rules• Data Centers• Data Folders• Quality Tools

Areas of Focus• Student Mission• Comparative data• Class Meetings• PDSA in the Classroom• Standardizing key

process• Student-Led

Conferences

•2006-07 (Baseline) 29.9%•2007-08 (Target) 50%•2008-09 (Target) 70%•2009-10 (Target) 85%•2010-11 (Target) 100%

2006-2007 Data = 29.9% Completely

Implemented

Next Steps• Baseline measure tracked in scorecard• Utilize data for professional

development – Site based (Quality Liaison support)– District professional development

• Support Services continued deployment

• Action Research Teams & Quality Liaisons