46
Contraceptive Technology March 14, 2013 Anne Burke, MD, MPH Associate Professor, Gynecology and Obstetrics/ Population, Family, Reproductive Health Medical Advisor, Gates Institute Johns Hopkins University (with thanks to Jeff Spieler, USAID)

Contraceptive Technology - Advance Family Planningadvancefamilyplanning.org/...Contraception_14Mar13.pdf · contraceptive product that they control, especially for intermittent sex

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Contraceptive Technology March 14, 2013

Anne Burke, MD, MPH Associate Professor, Gynecology and Obstetrics/

Population, Family, Reproductive Health Medical Advisor, Gates Institute

Johns Hopkins University

(with thanks to Jeff Spieler, USAID)

Priorities in Contraceptive Technology

l  Expand access to, and availability of, EXISTING contraceptive methods (public and private sectors)

l  Make existing methods EASIER, CHEAPER, BETTER

l  Develop TOTALLY NEW TECHNOLOGY that can address unmet needs

Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

Intrauterine Contraception

LNG IUS

l  20 mcg levonorgestrel/day

l  Approved for 5 years use

Copper T 380A IUD •  Copper ions •  Approved for 10 years use

IUDs: Mechanism

l  Mechanism: primarily by preventing fertilization w  Copper has direct effects on uterus, sperm and ova

w  Levonorgestrel:

§ THICKENS cervical mucus

§ THINS endometrial lining

The levonorgestrel intrauterine system

Levonorgestrelintrauterine

system

Detail

Hormone cylinderRate-controllingmembrane

Uterinewall

Section ofsystem

Years

Levonorgestrel intrauterine systemCu IUD

0 1 2 3 4 5

3

2

1

0

-1

-2

-3

-4

g/l

Change in hemoglobin during 5 years of use

Can IUD be used in:

l  Adolescents?

l  Nulliparous women?

l  Women with previous pelvic infection?

l  Women with HIV?

Can IUD be used in:

l  Adolescents?

l  Nulliparous women?

l  Women with previous pelvic infection?

l  Women with HIV?

YES!

Newly approved IUD

l  “Skyla ®”

l  A little smaller

l  A little less hormone

l  3 years

Implanon/Nexplanon™ Etonogestrel Implants

l  Progestin-only method

l  4 x 0.2cm

l  Prevents ovulation

l  Long-acting (3 years)

l  Main side-effect is unpredictable menstrual cycles

l  Fertility returns within a few days of removal

l  Highly effective

Other implantable contraceptives

l  Jadelle, Sinoplant

w  2-rod implant (levonorgestrel)

w Wide distribution in other countries

Zarin® (Sino-implant II)

l  Subdermal Contraceptive Implant

Sino-­‐implant  (II)/Zarin  

Shanghai  Dahua    Pharmaceu/cal    Ltd.  

150  mg  levonorgestrel  in  2  rods  

Inser/on:  2  min  Removal:  5  min  

4  years  

Disposable  

$8.50      

$2.13  

Applica/on  submiGed  

Comparison of Hormonal Implants Jadelle   Implanon  

Manufacturer   Bayer  Healthcare    

Merck/MSD    

Formula:on   150  mg  levonorgestrel  in  2  rods  

68  mg  etonogestrel  in  1  rod    

Mean  Inser:on  &  Removal  :me  

Inser/on:  2  min  Removal:  5  min  

Inser/on:  1  min  Removal:  2-­‐3  min  

Labeled  dura:on   5  years   3  years  

Trocars   Autoclavable  and  Disposable  

Pre-­‐loaded  disposable  

Cost  of  implant  (US$)1  

$8.50  (ê$19.00)   $16.40  (ê$18.00)    

Cost  per  Year  (if  used  for  dura:on)  

$1.70   $5.50    

WHO  Prequal   Yes   Yes  1  FOB  price  in  country  of  origin.    

Characteristics of LARC

l  Immediately effective

l  HIGHLY effective

l  Safe

l  Rapid return of fertility after removal

0 5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

LNG IUD cu IUD Implant DMPA Pills Ring Patch Other

CHOICE 75%

Review of Safety of Postpartum IUD Cochrane database review, 2003

Main results l  Immediate post-partum insertion of IUDs

appeared safe and effective. l  Few contraindications to method l  Expulsion rates appear to be higher

than with interval insertion. l  Feasibility supported by PPIUD insertion

popularity in countries as diverse as China, Mexico, and Egypt.

l  Early follow-up (6 weeks) may be important in identifying spontaneous IUD expulsions

Grimes D, Schulz K, van Vliet H, Stanwood N. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1

Postplacental IUD

6.9%

12.0%

p<0.001

Chi Contraception 1985; slides c/o PSI Blumenthal

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Inexperienced providers

Experienced providers

% of women experiencing expulsion/6 months

P <0.001

How do you do it? Postplacental IUD Insertion

2

1

Nestorone® / Ethinyl Estradiol 1-Year Ring (CVR)

8.4 mm (3/8”) in cross section

58 mm (2 1/4”) in diameter

NES Core

NES / EE Core

*Delivers NES/EE 150/15µg /day, 13 cycles 3 weeks on followed by 1 week off Developed by the Population Council Sponsored by USAID, NICHD, WHO

Most trial participants were satisfied, found the CVR easy to use, would pay for it if available, recommend it to friends, and preferred it to other methods they have used (Results: N=861)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Were satisfied or very satisfied with the CVR

Found the CVR easy to use

Has recommended CVR to family/friends

Would pay to use CVR in future

Believes the CVR is better than other

contraceptive methods

Perc

ent o

f Par

ticip

ants

(Ter

min

al Su

rvey

)

Acceptability & Pregnancies: Adherence (T2)

Injectables

l  Advantages:

w Length of action

w Safety

w TASK-SHIFTING OPPORTUNITY

l Disadvantages:

w Continuation

w Side effects

DepoProvera®: Medroxyprogesterone acetate

l  Given every 3 months

l  Mechanism: w Suppresses ovulation

w Thickens cervical mucus

w Thins endometrium

l  Intramuscular injection

New formulation of Depo-Provera: Depo-subQ Provera 104, for delivery with Uniject

Depo-subQ Provera 104: ▼ New formulation for subQ

injection ▼ 30% lower dose (104 mg vs.

150 mg) ▼ Rapid onset of action ▼ Same effectiveness, same

length of protection (>3 months)

The LD Formulation of Depo-Provera Is Efficacious at Lower Peak Concentrations

Pharmacokinetic Profiles of the LD Formulation of Depo-Provera and Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0

50 100 150 200 0

Depo-Provera (n=8) LD Formulation of Depo-Provera (n=42)

Time (days)

MPA

Ser

um

Con

cent

ratio

n (n

g/m

L)

Data on file.

LD = lower dose.

New formulation of Depo-Provera: Depo-subQ Provera 104, for delivery with Uniject

Uniject (Sayana Press): ▼  Single dose, single package ▼  Prefilled, sterile, non-reusable ▼  Short needles for subQ injection

(easier use by non-clinical personnel/CHWs)

▼ Compact; easy to use and store ▼ Potential for home- and self-

injection ▼ Approval by EMA and LDC

registration forthcoming

Emergency Contraceptive Pills

l SAFE l  Mechanism: Primarily by delaying/ preventing ovulation

w Does not cause abortion

l  Many brands available worldwide

l  Repeated use is safe

l  Less effective than “planned” BC

Trussell J, Jordan B. Contraception. 2006

l  Pregnancy rates after levonorgestrel EC were 1.5 – 3%

l  EC can be taken up to 72 (or 120) hours after intercourse, but effectiveness decreases with time. WHY? w  Related to mechanism of action…

l  Sperm can survive for several days

Chance of pregnancy with intercourse, compared to timing of ovulation

Source: Wilcox, 2001

l  Antiprogestin, similar to mifepristone w  Dose = 30mg

l  Blocks ovulation

l  May also have endometrial effects

l  Does not cause abortion

l  More effective than LNG for EC w  Does not lose effectiveness with delay

w  Lower pregnancy rates in the studies

Ulipristal for EC

page 32

SILCS Diaphragm: “One size fits most”

Firm insertion edge w/

soft spring in

rim for improved

comfort

Grip dimples and easy insertion

Cervical cup membrane

Fingertip dome for easy removal

Side view Top view

Silocone rather than latex Appropriate for OTC use No pelvic exam or fitting required

US CT completed in 2010

USFDA approval in 2012

Woman’s Condom

•  Easy to handle/use, insert and remove

•  Stable during use •  Comfortable for

both partners

•  Less expensive than current options

Product Features

•  Manufactured by Dahua (China – not same company as for SI-II)

•  U.S. clinical trials (2011- 2012) will lead to FDA product registration – estimated for 2013

•  CE Mark application planned for 2011

New Contraceptive Methods Needed

1.  Non-hormonal, non-steroidal or non-estrogen or novel progestin-only oral contraceptives

2.  Biodegradable progestin-only implants (APS)

3.  Non-surgical methods of male and female sterilization

4.  Novel multi-purpose/dual protection methods (APS)

5.  Peri-coital contraception

Spermicides – works in progress

l  Highly effective?

l  No vaginal irritation?

l  Trials ongoing:

Amphora Gel (Evofem)

•  Water-based gel •  Acidiform •  Hormone-free •  Trials ongoing

2

“On demand” products: ü  Used before/after intercourse ü  Appropriate for women who have

infrequent sex, or who would like more direct control over their own protection

Priorities for product R&D:

Other MPT-related activities: Clarifying the Regulatory Approval of MPTs v  Review existing guidance on combination products

from Regulatory Authorities (RAs)

v  Convene technical meetings with RAs and WHO to discuss approval pathways for MPTs

Initiative for MPTs v  Expand international awareness and support

for MPTs v  Convene technical meetings to advance late-

stage product development and introduction

Sustained release devices: ü  User-initiated, but do not require

daily action ü  Should increase acceptability and

adherence, and therefore overall effectiveness

USAID support for MPTs:

•  Prevent unintended pregnancy •  Protect against HIV, other STIs & RTIs •  Provide additional health benefits

Our Ultimate Goal: An expanded range of §  Effective §  Acceptable §  Accessible prevention options that address the sexual and reproductive health concerns of women as they change over time.

Aim: develop multipurpose prevention options that…

Sustained-Release Combination Intravaginal Rings (IVRs)

4

v  90-day TFV + LNG IVR (CONRAD)

§  Combines the hormonal contraceptive LNG with TFV in a polyurethane IVR

§  Clinical studies of TFV+LNG ring to begin 2012

v  60-day Dapivirine + Contraceptive IVR (IPM)

§  Combines a hormonal contraceptive (tbd) with dapivirine in a vaginal ring (material tbd)

§  Formulation work is underway §  The dapivirine-only ring will begin Phase III efficacy

testing for HIV prevention in mid-2012

MPT development activities, Part II:

TFV/Levonorgestrel (LNG) IVR: Segmented Reservoir Design

  Builds on the TFV-only reservoir IVR design

  Segmented approach allows for independent optimization of each drug’s delivery needs

  LNG release rate is controlled by: 1.  Rate-controlling membrane

(thickness and diffusivity)

2.  Length of the LNG segment

 

TFV LNG

TFV/LNG IVR: Product Design Objectives

  Release Rates: 4 TFV: 10 mg/d 4 LNG: 10 or 20 µg/d

  Duration: 90 days

  Dimensions/Mechanical properties: 4 Same as TFV IVR, similar to

NuvaRing®

20 mm LNG

segment

10 mm LNG

segment

3

v  MZL Combination Topical Gel (Population Council)    

§  Combines MIV-150 + Zinc Acetate + the progestin LNG in carrageenan gel

§  Prevents pregnancy, HIV, HSV-2 and HPV (based on in vivo studies) §  Provides effective protection for up to 24 hours §  Gel optimization and initial PK in vivo is underway

v  SILCS Diaphragm + Tenofovir (TFV) Gel (CONRAD)

§  Use the SILCS diaphragm as a delivery device for TFV gel, reformulated to enhance contraceptive activity

§  TFV gel is the only topical ARV shown thus far to be effective in preventing HIV (39%) and HSV-2 (51%)

§  Combination would provide a non-hormonal method to prevent unintended pregnancy, HIV and HSV-2

§  Designed for effective protection for up to 24 hours §  TFV gel reformulation to begin in early 2012

“On Demand” Barriers and Gels

+

MPT development activities, Part I:

SILCS/Contraceptive TFV Gel

  Work funded by USAID #APS-OAA-10-000003: Fast-track Late-stage Development of MPTs

  Objectives: 1.  Develop the combination of SILCS

diaphragm with TFV gel as a MPT with the potential to address multiple indications: 1.  Contraception 2.  HIV prevention 3.  HSV prevention

2.  Reformulate the TFV gel to enhance contraceptive efficacy

5

Conclusion: first-generation MPTs

Ø  These MPT products in development could simultaneously prevent pregnancy, HIV, HSV-2, and HPV.

Ø Diversifying delivery & dosing options is KEY to meeting the different needs of women, and thereby expanding acceptability and use: §  MZL gel: ideal method for women who would like a product they could

use “on demand”, and that lasts up to 24 hours

§  SILCS+TFV gel: ideal method for women who would like a non-hormonal contraceptive product that they control, especially for intermittent sex

§  Combination IVR (TFV+LNG or DAP+HC): ideal method for women who would like a highly effective product that requires minimal user involvement, and that provides continuous protection for 1-3 months

Our Aim: Expand the range of safe, effective and acceptable prevention options that meet different needs,

and are appropriate for delivery and use in low resource settings