Upload
vokhuong
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 1/56
Contract no.: 248231
MOre Safety for All by Radar Interference Mitigation
D3.1 – Use cases description list for simulation scenarios
Report type Deliverable
Work Group WP3
Dissemination level Public
Version number Version 1.2
Date 28/02/2011
Lead Partner Daimler
Project Coordinator Dr. Martin Kunert
Robert Bosch GmbH Daimler Strasse 6
71229 Leonberg Phone +49 (0)711 811 37468
copyright 2010
the MOSARIM Consortium
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 2/56
Authors
Name Company
Christoph Fischer Daimler
Malte Ahrholdt Volvo Technology
Alicja Ossowska Valeo
Martin Kunert Bosch
Andreas John Hella
Robert Pietsch Continental
Frantz Bodereau Autocruise
Jürgen Hildebrandt Bosch
Hans-Ludwig Blöcher Daimler
Holger Meinel Daimler
Revision chart and history log
Version Date Reason
0.1 22.07.2010 Initial version
0.2 09.12.2010 Added TX Antenna descriptions
0.2.1 21.12.2010 Antenna descriptions for W-Band
0.2.2 10.01.2011 Reworked chapter 4, Introduction, Conclusion
0.3 03.02.2011 Removed the definitions chapter
0.4 10.02.2011 Updated antenna chapter, new ordering
0.4.1 10.02.2011 Applications descriptions
0.5 10.02.2011 Additions from Telcon
0.6 11.02.2011 Last updates for peer review
0.7 14.02.2011 Minor updates and corrections
1.0 15.02.2011 Deliverable for peer review
1.1 17.02.2011 Finalized Conclusion
1.2 28.02.2011 Reviewed and corrected Deliverable
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 3/56
Table of Contents Authors...................................................................................................................... 2 Revision chart and history log ................................................................................ 2 Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 4 2 Detailed Description of Applications .................................................................... 5
2.1 Adaptive Cruise Control ............................................................................... 5 2.2 Collision Warning System ............................................................................ 6 2.3 Collision Mitigation System .......................................................................... 7 2.4 Vulnerable Road User Detection.................................................................. 8 2.5 Blind Spot Detection..................................................................................... 9 2.6 Lane Change Assist ................................................................................... 10 2.7 Rear Cross Traffic Alert.............................................................................. 11 2.8 Back-Up Parking Assist.............................................................................. 12
3 Detailed Description of Scenarios ..................................................................... 13 3.1 Victim and interferer passing each other [D2b] .......................................... 13 3.2 Standstill at intersection, target ahead [T1a] .............................................. 15 3.3 Victim approaches target at intersection [T1b] ........................................... 17 3.4 Following a car, oncoming interferer [T2a] ................................................. 19 3.5 Oncoming interferer with motorcycle target [T2c] ....................................... 21 3.6 Oncoming interferer with pedestrian as target [T2d]................................... 23 3.7 Victim and interferer drive in parallel, target ahead, lane change [T3b]...... 24 3.8 Interference from crossing traffic [X1]......................................................... 26 3.9 High density of interferers [X2] ................................................................... 28 3.10 Direct interference, traffic in the same direction with similar velocities, rear sensor [R1a].......................................................................................................... 31 3.11 Interference with multiple backwards looking sensors [R2] ........................ 32 3.12 Direct interference, traffic in the same direction with similar velocities, side sensor [RD2a] ....................................................................................................... 34 3.13 Overtaking [RD2b]...................................................................................... 36 3.14 Being Overtaken [RD2c]............................................................................. 37 3.15 Forward looking sensor on following vehicle [RD2f] ................................... 38 3.16 Victim and interferer driving in parallel, target following [RT1].................... 39 3.17 Blind spot detection with multiple interferers [RT2] .................................... 40 3.18 Interference with forward looking radar [RT3] ............................................ 42 3.19 Parking slot, interfering sensor looking forward [RP1a].............................. 44 3.20 Congested Motorway [H1a]........................................................................ 46 3.21 Congested Motorway in a Tunnel [H1b] ..................................................... 47 3.22 Dense Urban Traffic [H2]............................................................................ 48
4 Summary of selected Scenarios and appropriate Ranking................................ 49 5 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 51 6 Bibliography....................................................................................................... 52 7 Appendix: Important Parameters of Sensor Antennas ...................................... 53 8 Appendix: List of Abbreviations ......................................................................... 56
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 4/56
1 Introduction This deliverable describes applications and traffic scenarios, being important for the upcoming simulation purposes, to be worked on in throughout work package 3. Appropriate determination of relevant use cases as well as suitable scenario ratings will be derived here. Chapter 2 gives the detailed description of all relevant applications in form of tables, including the varied scenario parameters based on the different sensors to be taken and tested in the future, together with a short description of possible consequences due to system failures. Based on the specification of relevant scenarios, applications and traffic conditions, as already carried out, prioritized and finalized in Task 1.2, as well as the grouping criteria being defined already in Task 4.3 [MT4.3], nine different scenario groups were chosen accordingly. They are generally described in Chapter 3. In Chapter 4 these selected scenarios are summarized and rated in their relevance appropriately. A general description of the TX antennas being employed for the different applications, as described in Chapter 2, is provided in appendix 7.
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 5/56
2 Detailed Description of Applications The following chapter gives reasonable ranges for specific parameters to be defined for a given application. These derived ranges are supposed to give some guidance and may lead to alternative scenarios to be considered. Also an estimation of the consequences and the severity of failures of a sensor are given briefly to simplify ranking. Some definitions of the below described applications have been taken from the E-Value project [E-Value].
2.1 Adaptive Cruise Control
Functional specifications of ACC
Main use-cases In free traffic on the motorway (ACC). In Stop&Go situations on the motorway (ACC S&G).
Major technology and function Object detection: Current solutions are using information obtained long and/or short range radar or lidar sensors possible in combination with a video camera. On detection level the function identifies target vehicles in the vehicles driving lane. The system reduces the subject vehicle velocity by braking in case that a vehicle in front drives at lower speed and accelerates the vehicle in order to keep desired velocity. The driver is warned in case the necessary deceleration cannot be performed by the system.
Function output � Informative/Advisory/Warning
■ Support
� Autonomous intervention Level of driver support � Strategical
� Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function To support drivers on monotonous tasks of vehicle guidance at a constant velocity. Velocity adaptation and following a target vehicle in safe distance.
Intended driver behaviour Driver controls the system and reacts to warnings and take over longitudinal vehicle control in critical situations
Time schedule The time gap (following distance depending on velocity) can be adjusted by the driver.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 1 / 2 / 5
Relative speed (victim to interferer) -100 / 100 / 200 km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 10 / 100 / 200 m
Expected main direction of interference Driving Direction
Sensor type to be considered FMR, Medium and Long Range
Frequency of occurrence (Events per hour) 0 / 100 / 3600
Typical Scenario D2b, T1a, T1b, T2a, T2c, T2d, T3b
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Failures may impair the main function.
Severity low
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 6/56
2.2 Collision Warning System
Functional specifications of CWS
Main use-cases The subject vehicle approaches another vehicle from behind with a speed and distance to which the risk of a rear-end collision of the other vehicle is high. A preventive action; braking or steering manoeuvre is required to avoid the collision.
Major technology and function Perception: Current solutions are using information obtained long and/or short range radar sensors or lidar sensors possible in combination with a video camera. On detection level the function identifies potential collision targets in the vehicles field of view. If a collision is imminent the action from the function is to warn the driver by issuing an auditory and/or visual warning.
Function output ■ Informative/Advisory/Warning
� Support � Autonomous intervention
Level of driver support � Strategical � Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function To support drivers in situations where a rear-end collision/ forward collision is imminent. The intended benefit of the function is to avoid or mitigate frontal/rear-end collisions by issuing a warning with aim to focus the driver´s attention to the critical situation and take an action.
Intended driver behaviour Drivers react to the issued warning and respond by braking and/or steering away.
Time schedule The system acts within a few seconds before an actual incident.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 0 / 2 / 5
Relative speed (victim to interferer) 0 / 50 / 100 km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 0 / 50 / 200 m
Expected main direction of interference Driving Direction
Sensor type to be considered FMR, Mid and Long Range
Frequency of occurrence (Events per hour) 0 / 10 / 100
Typical Scenario T2a, T3b
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Expected effects may impair the main function of this system.
Severity medium
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 7/56
2.3 Collision Mitigation System
Functional specifications of CMS
Main use-cases The driver and his/hers vehicle approaches another vehicle from behind with a speed and distance to which the risk of a rear-end collision of the other vehicle is high. A preventive action; braking or steering manoeuvre is required to avoid the collision.
Major technology and function Perception: Current solutions are using information obtained long and/or short range radar or lidar sensors possible in combination with a video camera. On detection level the function identifies potential collision targets in the vehicles field of view. If a collision is imminent the action from the function is to reduce the threshold for the brake assist system or/and to increase braking force if the driver does not bake sufficiently and/or to perform autonomous braking.
Function output � Informative/Advisory/Warning
■ Support
■ Autonomous intervention Level of driver support � Strategical
� Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function Reduced collision speed and energy. Intended driver behaviour No intended driver reaction. In case of driver initated braking
the driver is expected to maintain the pedal pressure. Time schedule Autonomous braking occurs less than one second before
imminent collision. Activation of enhanced brake assist functionality occurs less than 2 seconds before imminent collision.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 0 / 2 / 5
Relative speed (victim to interferer) 0 / 50 / 100 km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 0 / 50 / 200 m
Expected main direction of interference Driving Direction
Sensor type to be considered FMR, Mid and Long Range, FMR and Pulsed, UWB Short Range
Frequency of occurrence (Events per hour) 0 / 1 / 10
Typical Scenario T2a, T3b
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Failures may impair the main function.
Severity high
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 8/56
2.4 Vulnerable Road User Detection
Functional specifications of Vulnerable Road User Detection
Main use-cases This function allows to protect vulnerable road user such as pedestrian, or bicycle riders. A preventive action, braking or steering manoeuvre is required to avoid the collision and/or actuation of bumper protection to reduce the injuries gravity of the vulnerable road user. An actively moved hood increases distance between hood and hard engine to further reduce the injuries gravity.
Major technology and function Perception: It is based on fusion between radar technology and camera to well classify the detected target. Radar technology ensures the robustness of the detection and the distance accuracy estimation, while camera classifies the object.
Function output ■ Informative/Advisory/Warning
� Support
■ Autonomous intervention Level of driver support � Strategical
� Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function This function is intended to protect vulnerable road users by activating braking and steering or pedestrian bumper protection and active hood system.
Intended driver behaviour No intended driver reaction. In case of driver initiated braking the driver is expected to maintain the pedal pressure.
Time schedule Autonomous braking occurs less than one second before time to collision. Activation of enhanced brake assist functionality and /or bumper protection and/or active hood occurs less than 2 seconds before time to collision.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 0 / 10 / 50
Relative speed (victim to interferer) 10 / 40 / 50 km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 0 / 20 / 40 m
Expected main direction of interference Driving Direction
Sensor type to be considered FMR, Short and Mid Range
Frequency of occurrence (Events per day) 5 / 20 / 100
Typical Scenario T2c, T2d, X1, X2
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Both missed detection and ghost targets will impair the effectiveness.
Severity high
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 9/56
2.5 Blind Spot Detection
Functional specifications of BSD
Main use-cases The driver receives a visual and/or acoustical warning when an object is in the subject vehicle’s blind spot. Active BSM corrects the path of driving by using brakes (ADAC Yellow Angel 2011).
Major technology and function Perception: Current solutions are using 24 GHz short range radars or vision sensors to detect objects in the blind spot zone. Prototype systems which monitor vehicles that are rapidly approaching in the adjacent lanes have been built up using radar sensors. BSM warns the diver. Advanced systems use brakes for steering to prevent a collision.
Function output ■ Informative/Advisory/Warning
� Support
■ Autonomous intervention Level of driver support � Strategical
� Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function Avoid sideswipe collisions during lane change manoeuvres Intended driver behaviour Upon receiving the warning the driver is assumed to avoid lane
changes that may lead to a collision. Time schedule The warning should be issued as soon as another vehicle is in
the defined blind spot zone. Active BSM reacts in critical situations.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 1 / 2 / 10
Relative speed (victim to interferer) 1 / 20 / 50 km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 1 / 5 / 20 m
Expected main direction of interference Backwards direction
Sensor type to be considered SMR, Short Range (narrow band or UWB)
Frequency of occurrence (Events per hour) 10 / 60 / 180
Typical Scenario RD2b, RD2c
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Most probably missed detections; False detections and wrong distances are also possible.
Severity high
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 10/56
2.6 Lane Change Assist
Functional specifications of LCA
Main use-cases When the subject vehicle wants to change road lane, it receives a warning signal if a vehicle approaches from behind with a risk of collision
Major technology and function Perception: Current solutions are using 24 GHz NB Radar. UWB SRR or Long Range Radar (76 GHz) solutions will be proposed with the capability of accurate target direction of arrival estimation. LCA warns the driver.
Function output ■ Informative/Advisory/Warning
■ Support
� Autonomous intervention Level of driver support � Strategical
� Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function This function is intended to reduce crashes or incidents resulting from lane change manoeuvres. It detects vehicles far away from the subject vehicle and estimates the level of risk for the lane change. It can be coupled with BSD system in order to avoid sideswipe collisions during lane change manoeuvres.
Intended driver behaviour Drivers react to the issued warning and decide not to change a lane.
Time schedule The warning should be issued as soon as another vehicle is in the defined lane change zone in the rear area of the subject vehicle.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 1 / 5 / 30
Relative speed (victim to interferer) -100 / 0 / 100 km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 3 / 30 / 70 m
Expected main direction of interference Backwards direction
Sensor type to be considered RMR, mid range. long range
Frequency of occurrence (Events per hour) 0 / 10 / 100
Typical Scenario RT3
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Most probably missed detections; False detections and wrong distances are also possible.
Severity medium
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 11/56
2.7 Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Functional specifications of Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Main use-cases This function allows preventing the subject vehicle from targets located at crossing roads. The traffic situations can be backing-up into passing traffic or intersection with a lack of visibility, etc.
Major technology and function Perception: It is based on radar technology to ensure robust and accurate detection. A warning is sent to the driver in case of a detected risk situation.
Function output ■ Informative/Advisory/Warning
� Support � Autonomous intervention
Level of driver support � Strategical � Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function This function is intended to reduce crashes or incidents resulting from crossing, intersection situations where visibility is reduced..
Intended driver behaviour Upon receiving the warning the driver is assumed to stop the vehicle.
Time schedule The warning should be issued as soon as a vehicle is estimated as dangerous regarding the TTC.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 1 / 2 / 10
Relative speed (victim to interferer) 0 / 10 / 50km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 0 / 10 / 30 m
Expected main direction of interference Any
Sensor type to be considered SMR, short range
Frequency of occurrence (Events per hour) 0 / 4 / 10
Typical Scenario RP1a
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Missed detections and incorrect information on distance or velocity of crossing objects.
Severity medium
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 12/56
2.8 Back-Up Parking Assist
Functional specifications of Parking Assist
Main use-cases This function is mainly used to alert a back-up with side detection. The subject vehicle moves back into a parking lot and the driver is informed if there is a risk.
Major technology Perception: It is based on radar technology. Function output ■ Informative/Advisory/Warning
■ Support
� Autonomous intervention Level of driver support � Strategical
� Tactical
■ Operational
Intended benefits with function This function is intended to reduce crashes or incidents resulting in parking situations, i.e. backing into a parking lot..
Intended driver behaviour Drivers react to the issued warning and respond by stopping the vehicle.
Time schedule The warning should be issued as soon as an object is in the defined detection zone.
Parameter Values
Parameter Value (min / typ / max)
Number of Objects 2 / 3 / 10
Relative speed (victim to interferer) 1 / 5 / 15 km/h
Distances (victim to interferer) 0 / 5 / 20
Expected main direction of interference Side
Sensor type to be considered RMR, short range
Frequency of occurrence (Events per hour) 0 / 2 / 10
Typical Scenario RP1a
Consequences and Severity of Failures
Consequences Most probably missed detections; False detections and wrong distances are also possible.
Severity medium
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 13/56
3 Detailed Description of Scenarios The following sections define the different scenarios to be simulated. The details of the used coordinate systems and other details of the description language can be found in the document for general definitions used throughout the MOSARIM project [General]. The individual sections are structured as follows: A figure from [D1.2] gives an overview of the scenario and the used objects. The objects are numbered and referred to in a table defining the basic values and the used variables. The values of these variables are given in the table that describes the scenario variations. In general the time to be simulated is 8 s if nothing else is stated.
3.1 Victim and interferer passing each other [D2b]
1
2
1
2
Figure 1 – Scenario [D2b] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 2 vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 2
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: see parameter variations, Table 2 y2: 4 m vx2: see parameter variations, Table 2 vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 2
Table 1: Detailed scenario description [D2b]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 14/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 x2
vx1 vx2
FMR
100 m 30 m/s 30 m/s 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 x2
vx1 vx2
FMR
30 m 10 m/s 10 m/s 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
3 x2
vx1 vx2
FMR
60 m 30 m/s 30 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 x2
vx1 vx2
FMR
30 m 10 m/s 10 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 2: Variation of scenario parameters [D2b]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 15/56
3.2 Standstill at intersection, target ahead [T1a]
1
2
3
Figure 2 – Scenario [T1a] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 0 m/s vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 4
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 30 m y2: 4 m
vx2: 0 m/s vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 4
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: see parameter variations, Table 4 y3: 0 m vx3: 0 m/s vy3: 0 m/s
Table 3: Detailed scenario description [T1a]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 16/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 x3
FMR
2 m 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 x3
FMR
5 m 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
3 x3
FMR
2 m 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 x3
FMR
5 m 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 4: Variation of scenario parameters [T1a]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 17/56
3.3 Victim approaches target at intersection [T1b]
1
2
3
Figure 3 - Scenario [T1b] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 6 vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 6
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 15m + x3
y2: 5m vx2: 0 m/s vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 6
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: see parameter variations, Table 6 y3: 0 m vx3: 0 m/s vy3: 0 m/s
Table 5: Detailed scenario description [T1b]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 18/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 x3
vx1
FMR
15 m 5 m/s 77GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 x3
vx1
FMR
30 m 10 m/s 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
3 x3
vx1
FMR
15 m 5 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 x3
vx1
FMR
30 m 10 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 6: Variation of scenario parameters [T1b]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 19/56
3.4 Following a car, oncoming interferer [T2a]
Figure 4 – Scenario [T2a] illustration
Number Parameters Description 1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 8 vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 8
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 200 m y2: 5 m vx2: see parameter variations, Table 8 vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 8
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: see parameter variations, Table 8 y3: 0 m vx3: see parameter variations, Table 8 vy3: 0 m/s
Table 7: Detailed scenario description [T2a]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 20/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
60 m 20 m/s 20 m/s 20 m/s 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
40 m 10 m/s 10 m/s 10 m/s 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
3 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
60 m 20 m/s 20 m/s 20 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
40 m 10 m/s 10 m/s 10 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 8: Variation of scenario parameters [T2a]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 21/56
3.5 Oncoming interferer with motorcycle target [T2c]
Figure 5 – Scenario [T2c] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Truck x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 10 vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 10
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 100 m y2: 5 m vx2: see parameter variations, Table 10 vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 10
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Motorcycle x3: see parameter variations, Table 10 y3: 0 m vx3: see parameter variations, Table 10 vy3: 0 m/s
Table 9: Detailed scenario description [T2c]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 22/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
60 m 20 m/s 20 m/s 20 m/s 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
40 m 10 m/s 10 m/s 10 m/s 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
3 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
60 m 20 m/s 20 m/s 20 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 x3
vx1
vx2
vx3
FMR
40 m 10 m/s 10 m/s 10 m/s 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 10: Variation of scenario parameters [T2c]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 23/56
3.6 Oncoming interferer with pedestrian as target [T2d]
Figure 6 – Scenario [T2d] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Truck x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 10 m/s vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 12
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 130 m y2: 4 m vx2: 10 m/s vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 12
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Pedestrian x3: 80 m y3: -7 m vx3: 0 m/s vy3: 1,5 m/s
Table 11: Detailed scenario description [T2d]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 FMR 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 FMR 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 12: Variation of scenario parameters [T2d]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 24/56
3.7 Victim and interferer drive in parallel, target ahead, lane change [T3b]
Figure 7 – Scenario [T3b] illustration
Number Parameters Description 1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Truck x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 25 m/s vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 14
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Truck x2: 0 m y2: 4 m vx2: 25 m/s vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 14
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: 80 m; see parameter variations, Table 14 y3: 0 m vx3: 28 m/s vy3: 1,5 m/s
4
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x4: 100 m; see parameter variations, Table 14 y4: 4 m vx4: 28 m/s vy4: 0 m/s
1
2 3 5
4
X
Y
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 25/56
5
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x5: 100 m; see parameter variations, Table 14 y5: 0 m vx5: 25 m/s vy5: 0 m/s
Table 13: Detailed scenario description [T3b]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 FMR 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 FMR 24 GHz ISM, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
3 vy3 1 m/s 4 x3
x4 x5
30 – 200 m 30 – 200 m 30 – 200 m
Table 14: Variation of scenario parameters [T3b]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 26/56
3.8 Interference from crossing traffic [X1]
The duration of the scenario to be simulated is 5 s.
Figure 8 – Scenario [X1] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 10 m/s vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 16
2
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Vulnerable road user (VRU) x2: 50 m y2: -3.8 m vx2: 0 m/s vy2: 1 m/s
3
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x3: 51.8 m y3: 5.4 m vx3: 0 m/s vy3: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 16
Table 15: Detailed scenario description [X1]
X
Y
1
3
2
Ref. point of 3
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 27/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 FMR 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 FMR 24 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 16: Variation of scenario parameters [X1]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 28/56
3.9 High density of interferers [X2]
The duration of the scenario to be simulated is 10 s.
Figure 9 – Scenario [X2] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 0 m/s vy1: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 18
2
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Vulnerable road user (VRU) x2: 4 m y2: -4 m vx2: 0 m/s vy2: 3 m/s
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 29/56
Number Parameters Description 3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: 18 m y3: 0 m vx3: 10 m/s vy3: 0 m/s
4
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x4: 14 m y4: -4 m vx4: 0 m/s vy4: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 18
5 Interfering
vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x5: 18 m y5: -4 m vx5: 0 m/s vy5: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 18
6
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x6: 6 m y6: 10 m vx6: 0 m/s vy6: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 18
7
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x7: 10 m y7: 10 m vx7: 0 m/s vy7: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 18
8
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x8: 22 m y8: 8 m vx8: 0 m/s vy8: 0 m/s; see parameter variations, Table 18 FMR; see parameter variations, Table 18
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 30/56
Number Parameters Description 9
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x9: 22 m y9: 4 m vx9: 0 m/s vy9: 0 m/s; see parameter variations, Table 18 FMR; see parameter variations, Table 18
Table 17: Detailed scenario description [X2]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 FMR 77 GHz, MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 FMR 79 GHz, MRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
3 FMR 79 GHz, MRR with DAA (detect and avoid), Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 vy8 vy9
-2 m/s -2 m/s
Table 18: Variation of scenario parameters [X2]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 31/56
3.10 Direct interference, traffic in the same direction with similar velocities, rear sensor [R1a]
Figure 10 – Scenario [R1a] illustration
Number Parameters Description 1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 20 vy1: 0 m/s FMR (24 GHz ISM); see parameter variations, Table 20
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 30 m y2: 0 m vx2: 20 m/s vy2: 0 m/s RMR (24 GHz ISM); see parameter variations, Table 20
Table 19: Detailed scenario description [R1a]
Remark: In this scenario 76 GHz LRR at rear end against 76 GHz LRR in front of a car might be a critical case (e.g. Toyota 76 GHz rear end radar), especially at low distances (traffic jam) see also 3.15
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 vx1 20 m/s 2 vx1 25 m/s 3 FMR MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values
see Appendix) 4 RMR SRR or MRR, Application LCA (Parameter values
see Appendix) Table 20: Variation of scenario parameters [R1a]
2 1
X
Y
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 32/56
3.11 Interference with multiple backwards looking sensors [R2]
Figure 11 – Scenario [R2] illustration
Number Parameters Description 1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations in table below vy1: 0 m/s FMR (24 GHz ISM); see parameter variations, Table 22
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 4 m y2: 4 m vx2: vx1
vy2: 0 m/s SMR (24 GHz ISM); see parameter variations, Table 22
3
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x3: 4 m y3: -4 m vx3: vx1
vy3: 0 m/s SMR (24 GHz ISM); see parameter variations, Table 22
3
2
1
X
Y
4
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 33/56
4
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x4: see parameter variations, Table 22 y4: 0 m vx4: vx1
vy4: 0 m/s Table 21: Detailed scenario description [R1a]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 x4
vx1
20 m 20 m/s
2 x4
vx1
50 m 25 m/s
3 FMR MRR or LRR, Application ACC (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 SMR SRR, Application LCA (Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 22: Variation of scenario parameters [R1a]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 34/56
3.12 Direct interference, traffic in the same direction with similar velocities, side sensor [RD2a]
Figure 12 – Scenario [RD2a] illustration
Number Parameters Description 1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 25 m/s vy1: 0 m/s SMR, Application BSD (24 GHz ISM, Parameter values see Appendix)
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 0 m y2: -4 m vx2: 25 m/s vy2: see parameter variations, Table 24 SMR, Application BSD (24 GHz ISM, Parameter values see Appendix)
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: 20 m y3: 0 m vx3: 25 m/s vy3: 0 m/s
4
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x4: 21 m y4: -4 m vx4: 25 m/s vy4: 0 m/s
1
2
3
X
Y
4 5
6
7
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 35/56
5
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x5: -18 m y5: -4 m vx5: 25 m/s vy5: 0 m/s
6
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x6: 0 m y6: -20 m vx6: 25 m/s vy6: 0 m/s
7
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x7: -4 m y7: -25 m vx7: 25 m/s vy7: 0 m/s
Table 23: Detailed scenario description [RD2a]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 vy2 0 m/s 2 vy2 0.5 m/s
Table 24: Variation of scenario parameters [RD2a]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 36/56
3.13 Overtaking [RD2b]
Figure 13 – Scenario [RD2b] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 26 vy1: 0 m/s SMR, Application BSD (24 GHz ISM, Parameter values see Appendix)
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 30 m y2: -4 m vx2: 28 m/s vy2: 0 m/s SMR, Application BSD (24 GHz ISM, Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 25: Detailed scenario description [RD2b]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 vx1 30 m/s 2 vx1 45 m/s
Table 26: Variation of scenario parameters [RD2b]
2
1
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 37/56
3.14 Being Overtaken [RD2c]
Figure 14 – Scenario [RD2c] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 28 vy1: 0 m/s SMR, Application BSD (24 GHz ISM, Parameter values see Appendix)
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: -25 m y2: 4 m vx2: 36 m/s vy2: 0 m/s SMR, Application BSD (24 GHz ISM, Parameter values see Appendix)
Table 27: Detailed scenario description [RD2c]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 vx1 30 m/s 2 vx1 35 m/s
Table 28: Variation of scenario parameters [RD2c]
1
2
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 38/56
3.15 Forward looking sensor on following vehicle [RD2f]
The duration of the scenario to be simulated is 5 s.
Figure 15 – Scenario [RD2f] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 13.88 m/s; see parameter variations, Table 30 vy1: 0 m/s RMR; see parameter variations, Table 30
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: -50 m y2: 0 m vx2: vx1; see parameter variations, Table 30 vy2: 0 m/s FMR; see parameter variations, Table 30
Table 29: Detailed scenario description [RD2f]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 FMR 77 GHz, LRR or MRR (Parameter values see Appendix)
2 FMR 24 GHz ISM, LRR or MRR (Parameter values see Appendix)
4 RMR SRR or MRR (Parameter values see Appendix) 3 vx1 Always static and static to moving 4 vx1
vx2
36 m/s and 30 km/h 36 m/s
Table 30: Variation of scenario parameters [RD2f]
X
Y
2 1
Ref. point of 1
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 39/56
3.16 Victim and interferer driving in parallel, target following [RT1]
Figure 16 – Scenario [RT1] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: see parameter variations, Table 32 vy1: 0 m/s SMR, SRR, Application BSD (24 GHz, Parameter values see Appendix)
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 0 m y2: 4 m vx2: 25 m/s vy2: 0 m/s SMR, SRR, Application BSD (24 GHz, Parameter values see Appendix)
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: -50 m y3: 0 m vx3: 25 m/s vy3: 0 m/s
Table 31: Detailed scenario description [RT1]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 vx1 20 m/s 2 vx1 25 m/s
Table 32: Variation of scenario parameters [RT1]
1
2 3
X
Y
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 40/56
3.17 Blind spot detection with multiple interferers [RT2]
Figure 17 – Scenario [RT2] illustration
Number Parameters Description 1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: see parameter variations, Table 34 y1: 0 m vx1: 14 m/s vy1: 0 m/s SMR
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 0 m y2: 4 m vx2: 14 m/s vy2: 0 m/s SMR
3
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x3: 0 m y3: -4 m vx3: 14 m/s vy3: 0 m/s SMR
2
1
3
2
1
3
4
X
Y
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 41/56
4
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x4: -5 m y4: 0 m vx4: 14 m/s vy4: 0 m/s SMR
Table 33: Detailed scenario description [RT2]
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 SMR
SRR, Application BSD (24 GHz UWB / ISM, Parameter values see Appendix)
2 x1 0 ... 40m Table 34: Variation of scenario parameters [RT2]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 42/56
3.18 Interference with forward looking radar [RT3]
Figure 18 – Scenario [RT3] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 25 m/s vy1: 0 m/s SMR, SRR, Application BSD (24 GHz)
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: -20 m y2: 0 m vx2: see parameter variations, Table 36 vy2: 0 m/s FMR, LRR or MRR, Application ACC (24 GHz)
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Truck x3: 20 m y3: 0 m vx3: 25 m/s vy3: 0 m/s
4
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x4: -25 m y4: 4 m vx4: 30 m/s vy4: 0 m/s
Table 35: Detailed scenario description [RT3]
1
2
3
X
Y
4
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 43/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 vx2 25 m/s 2 vx2 30 m/s
Table 36: Variation of scenario parameters [RT3]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 44/56
3.19 Parking slot, interfering sensor looking forward [RP1a]
Figure 19 – Scenario [RP1a] illustration
Number Parameters Description
1
Host vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x1: 0 m y1: 0 m vx1: 0 m/s vy1: -1 m/s SMR, SRR, Application CTA (24 GHz)
2
Interfering vehicle
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Radar
Car x2: 25 m y2: -3 m vx2: see parameter variations, Table 38 vy2: 0 m/s FMR (24 GHz)
3
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x3: 3 m y3: 0 m vx3: 0 m/s vy3: 0 m/s
4
Target
Object
Initial Position
Velocity
Car x4: -3 m y4: 0 m vx4: 0 m/s vy4: 0 m/s
Table 37: Detailed scenario description [RP1a]
3 1
2
X
Y 4
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 45/56
Scenario variation
Variables Values
1 vx2 -5 m/s 2 vx2 -15 m/s
Table 38: Variation of scenario parameters [RP1a]
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 46/56
3.20 Congested Motorway [H1a]
This scenario will be considered when first experiences with the simulation environment have been made.
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 47/56
3.21 Congested Motorway in a Tunnel [H1b]
This scenario will be considered when first experiences with the simulation environment have been made.
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 48/56
3.22 Dense Urban Traffic [H2]
This scenario will be considered when first experiences with the simulation environment have been made.
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 49/56
4 Summary of selected Scenarios and appropriate Ranking
In Table 39 the different scenarios described in the previous chapter are grouped according to their individual relevance, ranging from high over medium to low, using the same scheme as in [MT4.3]. The specific relevance was jointly evaluated within the project. The special scenario of the absorbing chamber employed in Task 4.1 [D4.1], being represented in Group 0, was included for completeness. Group Number
Short Description
Scenarios in Group
Example Scenario Relevance
0 Reference Chamber and Free Space
Mandatory
1 Oncoming Traffic (with Target)
D2b, T1a, T1b,T2a, T2c, T2d
High
2 Oncoming Traffic This group is only relevant for real world measurements. In simulations it is joined with Group 1 (see above).
3 Cross Traffic X1, X2
Medium
4 Parallel Traffic, SLR Interference
RD2a, RT1
High
5 Victim Following Interferer
R1a, R2
Medium
6 Interferer Following Victim
RT3
High
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 50/56
7 Parking Slot RP1a
Medium
8 Congested Highway
H1a, H1b, H2
See 1
9 Parallel Traffic, FLR Interference This Group is only part of the simulations but not of the scenarios selected for measurements.
T3b
Low
Table 39: Grouping of the different scenarios and their relevance.
1 Group 8 is in general considered to be of high relevance, but is very complex from a simulation point
of view. Therefore it will only be implemented later on in the project, when experiences with simpler scenarios have already been gathered.
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 51/56
5 Conclusions Eight different groups of relevant applications and scenarios with high interference risk have been jointly derived, evaluated and prioritized:
• Oncoming Traffic with/ without Target
• Cross Traffic
• Parallel Traffic, SLR Interference
• Victim Following Interferer
• Interferer Following Victim
• Parking Slot
• Congested Motorway
• Parallel Traffic, FLR Interference Three of them, oncoming traffic with target, parallel traffic, interferer following victim, have been prioritized (jointly within the project) as “high” and thus will be investigated first. However, the here described relevant applications and scenarios must not be the last and final solution. Ongoing investigations within the scope of the project might ask for an enlargement, such not yet known applications and scenarios can be covered later, if necessary. All eight scenario groups shall be the basis for the upcoming simulation process in WP 3 in order to investigate and to determine the interference risk probability in such relevant use cases. Appropriate mitigation techniques shall be derived and simulated accordingly.
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 52/56
6 Bibliography [D1.2] Deliverable to MOSARIM Task 1.2 “Study report on relevant scenarios
and applications and requirements specification“, 2010. [D1.7] Deliverable to MOSARIM Task 1.7 “Estimation of interference risk from
incumbent frequency users and services”, 2010. [D4.1] Deliverable to MOSARIM Task 4.1 “Report from ground truth
interference between existing Radar sensors”, 2010. [E-Value] The E-value Project, Deliverable D1.1, “State of the Art and eVALUE
scope”: http://www.evalue-project.eu/pdf/evalue-080402-d11-v14-final.pdf (visited 10/2/2011).
[General] Document containing general definitions used throughout the
MOSARIM Project, 2010. [MT4.3] Milestone document to MOSARIM Task 4.3 “Implementation of
countermeasures, selection and preparation of real world test cases to assess countermeasures effectiveness”, 2011.
[HFAS] Winner, H.; Hakuli, S.; Wolf, G., “Handbuch
Fahrerassistenzsysteme“,Vieweg+Teubner, 2009.
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 53/56
7 Appendix: Important Parameters of Sensor Antennas The following chapter describes basic antenna parameters to be used in future simulations. Some parameters were already compiled in the deliverable of Task 1.7 [D1.7]. Some values refer to the coordinate system of Fig. 20.
Fig. 20: Coordinate system used for some antenna parameters.
Basic data for 24GHz ISM / UWB sensors: Sensor Type Parameter TX antenna(s)
min / typ / max RX antenna(s) min / typ / max
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=0° ϕ=0° 3dB beam width (az.) 90° / 120° / 150° 90° / 120° / 150° 3dB beam width (el.) 17° 17° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 2 Time for one complete scan n.a. n.a.
FMR, short range
Total field of view 90° / 120° / 150°
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=0° ϕ=0° 3dB beam width (az.) 40° 24° 3dB beam width (el.) 10° 10° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 2 Time for one complete scan n.a. n.a.
FMR, mid range
Total field of view 40°
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=+/-(40° / 90° / 140°)
ϕ=+/-(40° / 90° / 140°)
3dB beam width (az.) 150° 22° 3dB beam width (el.) 35° 35° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 7
Time for one complete scan n.a. n.a.
SMR, short range
Total field of view 150°
x
y
azimuth: ϕ
elevation: θ = 90°
assumed in all cases
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 54/56
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=180° ϕ=180° 3dB beam width (az.) 90° / 120° / 150° 90° / 120° / 150° 3dB beam width (el.) 17° 17° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 2 Time for one complete scan n.a. n.a.
RMR, short range
Total field of view 90° / 120° / 150°
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=180° ϕ=180° 3dB beam width (az.) 20° 90° 3dB beam width (el.) 20° 20° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 2 Time for one complete scan n.a. n.a.
RMR, mid range
Total field of view 90°
Basic data for 77 / 79GHz sensors: Sensor Type Parameter TX antenna(s)
min / typ / max RX antenna(s) min / typ / max
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=180° ϕ=180° 3dB beam width (az.) 50° / 70° / 90° 50° / 70° / 90° 3dB beam width (el.) 10° / 15° / 20° 10° / 15° / 20° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 / 2 / 5 1 / 2 / 5 Time for one complete scan 10ms / 25ms / 50ms 10ms / 25ms / 50ms
FMR, short range
Total field of view 40° / 90° / 120°
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=0° ϕ=0° 3dB beam width (az.) 5° / 12° / 20° 5° / 12° / 20° 3dB beam width (el.) 8° / 12° / 14° 8° / 12° / 14° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 2 / 5 / 10 2 / 5 / 10 Time for one complete scan 10ms / 25ms / 50ms 10ms / 25ms / 50ms
FMR, mid range
Total field of view 20° / 40° / 60°
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=0° ϕ=0° 3dB beam width (az.) 3° / 4° / 5° 3° / 4° / 5° 3dB beam width (el.) 4° 4° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 4 (LRR3),
17 (ARS300) 4 (LRR3),
17 (ARS300) Time for one complete scan 0 ms / 25ms / 40 ms 0 ms / 25ms / 40 ms
FMR, long range
Total field of view 17° / 20° / 25°
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=+/-(40° / 90° / 140°)
ϕ=+/-(40° / 90° / 140°)
3dB beam width (az.) 30° / 60° / 90° 30° / 60° / 90° 3dB beam width (el.) 10° / 20° / 30° 10° / 20° / 30° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 / 2 / 4 1 / 2 / 4 Time for one complete scan 5ms / 10ms / 50ms 5ms / 10ms / 50ms
SMR, short range
Total field of view 20° / 40° / 60°
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 55/56
Beam symmetry direction ϕ=180° ϕ=180°
3dB beam width (az.) 50° / 70° / 90° 50° / 70° / 90° 3dB beam width (el.) 10° / 15° / 20° 10° / 15° / 20° Amplitude of first side lobe -20dBc -20dBc Number of beams 1 / 2 / 4 1 / 2 / 4 Time for one complete scan 10ms / 20ms / 50ms 10ms / 20ms / 50ms
RMR, short range
Total field of view 50° / 70° / 100°
MOSARIM No.248231 28.02.2011
File: D3.1_v1.2.doc 56/56
8 Appendix: List of Abbreviations ACC Active/Adaptive Cruise Control BSD Blind Spot Detection CMS Collision Mitigation System CTA Cross Traffic Assist CWS Collision Warning System DAA Detect and Avoid FLR Forward Looking Radar FMR Front Mounted Radar ISM Industrial, Scientific, Medical LCA Lane Change Assist LRR Long Range Radar MLD Main Lobe Direction MRR Medium Range Radar NB Narrow Band RCTA Rear Cross Traffic Alert RMR Rear Mounted Radar SLR Side Looking Radar SMR Side Mounted Radar SRR Short Range Radar S&G Stop&Go TTC Time to Collision UWB Ultra-Wideband VRUD Vulnerable Road User Detection