Control Lab_Experiment 4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    1/13

    EEP 301 : CONTROL ENGG. LABORATORY

    Experiment- 4

    Process Control Trainer

    GROUP MEMBERS:

    VISHAL GAUTAM (2010EE20531) GOBIND PRASAD (2010EE20516) KAMAL KISHORE (2010EE20519) SURENDRA GEHLOT (2010EE20531) JAINESH KUMAR (2010EE20518) GHANSHYAM MEENA (2010EE20515) DEVENDRA KUMAR (2010EE20512)

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    2/13

    Aim: To perform experiment on 37-100 Process Control Trainerand demonstrate the characteristics such as Distance/Velocity

    lag, Transfer Lag, System Response and PID control etc.

    Introduction: In this equipment, air drawn from the

    atmosphere by a centrifugal blower is driven past a heater grid

    and through a length of tubing to atmosphere again. The process

    of heating the air flowing in the tube to the desired temperature

    level and the purpose of the control equipment is to measure the

    air temperature, compare it with the value set by the operator

    and generate a control signal which determine the amount ofelectrical power supplied to the correcting element, in this case a

    heater mounted adjacent to the blower.

    Procedure:

    The following assignments are carried out using the 37-100

    process trainer.

    System Response:

    In this Part we have observed the system response in the terms of

    Disturbance of the process , causing a change in the controlled

    condition, may occur on the supply side or the demand side of the

    system. In this process, supply side disturbances can be caused by

    changes of inlet air flow, ambient air temp. or supply volt. to the

    heater . The response of the system to a disturbance is dependent

    on proportional band width.

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    3/13

    Fig 1: Response to Step Change Disturbance

    1. Adjust the set value to 50oc.

    2. Set proportional band to 100%.

    3. Adjust the blower throttle control to 4.

    4. Place the 'detector probe' in the 11'' position.

    5. Set the switch on the side of 37-100 to 'heater'.

    6. Set the CRO according to specified value.

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    4/13

    Observation:

    (A) Proportional control = 100%

    (i) Throttle control = 4

    (ii) Throttle control = 5

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    5/13

    (iii) Throttle control = 6

    (B) Proportional control = 200%

    (i) Throttle control = 4

    (ii) Throttle control = 5

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    6/13

    (iii) Throttle control = 6

    (B) Proportional control = 30%

    (i) Throttle control = 4

    (ii) Throttle control = 5

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    7/13

    (iii) Throttle control = 6

    Closed Loop Open Loop

    S.No. Throttle

    Control

    Measured

    Value

    Measured

    Value

    1 . 2 49 68

    2. 3 48 62

    3. 4 47 574. 5 46 54

    5. 6 44 47

    6. 7 43 45

    7. 8 41 43

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    8/13

    Distance/velocity Lag :

    An alteration to the condition of a process affects the detecting

    element after a time interval which is dependent on the velocity of

    the process and the distance between the point of change and the

    detector. This time interval L is the distance/velocity or transport lag,

    as given by the equation:

    L = distance/velocity

    It is a pure lag, there being no change in the magnitude or form of

    the signal. The effect of distance/velocity lag on different input

    signals.

    Set value is adjusted to 350C . Adjust the 'blower throttle control ' to 4 .

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    9/13

    Process control trainer is kept in closed loop

    S.No. Frequency Input

    Amplitude

    Output

    Amplitude

    1. 0.1 2.16v 1.44v

    2. 0.5 2.08v 1.28v3. 1.5 3.4v 640mv

    4. 2 4.16 400mv

    5. 3 4.16 400mv

    1.) For Frequency 0.1 Hz

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    10/13

    2.) For Frequency 0.5 Hz

    3. )For Frequency 1.5 Hz

    4). For Frequency 2 Hz.

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    11/13

    5. ) For Frequency 3 Hz

    System becomes oscillatory for proportional band of 30 %

    System becomes stable for proportional band of 60%

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    12/13

    PID Control

    Deviation, is the difference between the measured value of

    controlled condition and the set value. Sustained deviation is termed

    offset. In a controller with proportional controller, the output signal

    is directly proportional to deviation, causing the correcting element

    to supply more or less power to the process.

    The relationship between deviation and controller output is defined

    as proportional band. As proportional band is decreased, deviation

    is decreased until a point is reached at which the system becomes

    unstable.

    Procedure:

    1) Set the value to 400C.

    2.) Observe the measured value of temperature.

    Circuit Diagram for PID Control.

  • 7/31/2019 Control Lab_Experiment 4

    13/13

    Observation:

    S.No. Set Value Measured

    Value

    Kp KI

    1. 40 34 0.1 -

    2. 40 36 0.2 -

    3. 40 40 - 1.06

    For Kp = 0.6 , Ki = 0.1(with derivative circuit disabled )

    For Kp = 0.3 , Ki = 0.1 , Kd = 10