2
7/28/2019 Controversy in Classrooms http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/controversy-in-classrooms 1/2 Controversy in Classrooms Tackling Hot-Button Issues with Students Homophobic Bullying ScottSummers TE804InquiryProject March22,2013 ContextandQuestion Ibecameinterestedinthistopicbecausetoomanystudentsthink that“gay”isanacceptablewordtodescribesomethingtheydislike ordisagreewith.WhenIwasastudent,Iwasjustasguiltyasthe kidsinmyclassroom.Iusedtodescribeassignmentsas“gay”andI usedtheword“faggot”onadailybasis.AsIgotolderIstartedto realizethattheseloadedwordsmarginalizedpeopleIconsidered friends,students,andcolleagues.Asaneducator,Ifeelitismy responsibilitytomakemystudentsmoreawareofthepowerof languageandhowifaffectsthosewhosurroundthem.My questionswere: v HowcanImakestudentsmoreinformedcitizensthattreat humanswithdignityandrespect? v WhatstrategiescanIemploytodeterhomophobicbullying? QuickFactson HomophobicBullyingin Schools OfLGBTstudentssurveyed intheUnitedStates: v 86.2%reportedverbal assaultatschool v 44.1%reportedphysical harassmentatschool v 25.1%reported physicalassaultat school v 80%saidtheirteacher never,orrarely interrupted homophobicremarks Findings HerearesomecommonwaysschoolsdealwithLGBTissues: 1. Avoidance:Theeasiestwaytodealwithanissueistoignoreit. Alargenumberofschoolsnationwidedonotevenconsider homophobiaanissueinschoolordonotacknowledgetheissue 2. Condemnation:LGBTindividualsareseenassinfulorimmoral inbothpublicandprivateschools 3. Marginalization:ConsideringLGBTissuesasunimportantand lettingthemfalltothewayside 4. Separation:Disconnectinghomophobiaasaformof discriminationfromrelatedissuessuchassexismorracism 5. Compartmentalization:Resourcesarenotutilizedtodevelop understanding.HomophobiaandLGBTissuesarelefttoone disciplinethatoftenhaslimitedresources 6. A-historicalversushistoricalapproach:FocusingonLGBT issuesinthepresentdayandneglectingthelonghistoryof humanrightsviolationsacrosstheglobe 7. LocalversusGlobal:Viewingtheissueaseitherlocalorglobal, butnotboth 8. Whole-schoolapproach:Utilizationofafterschoolactivities, research,Gay-StraightAlliances,anti-bullyingcampaigns,guest speakers,andschoolrulestoprotectLGBTstudentsandcreate acultureofacceptance,nottolerance.Thesestrategiesrequire resources,butmayhaveaprofoundimpact Source:VanDriel,Barry,andMichelleKahn."Homophobia."TeachingControversialIssuesinthe Classroom:KeyIssuesandDebates.Ed.PaulaCowanandHenryMaitles.London:Continuum,2012.

Controversy in Classrooms

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Controversy in Classrooms

7/28/2019 Controversy in Classrooms

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/controversy-in-classrooms 1/2

Controversy in ClassroomsTackling Hot-Button Issues with Students 

Homophobic Bullying 

ScottSummersTE804InquiryProject

March22,2013

ContextandQuestionIbecameinterestedinthistopicbecausetoomanystudentsthink

that“gay”isanacceptablewordtodescribesomethingtheydislike

ordisagreewith.WhenIwasastudent,Iwasjustasguiltyasthe

kidsinmyclassroom.Iusedtodescribeassignmentsas“gay”andI

usedtheword“faggot”onadailybasis.AsIgotolderIstartedto

realizethattheseloadedwordsmarginalizedpeopleIconsidered

friends,students,andcolleagues.Asaneducator,Ifeelitismy

responsibilitytomakemystudentsmoreawareofthepowerof

languageandhowifaffectsthosewhosurroundthem.Myquestionswere:

v HowcanImakestudentsmoreinformedcitizensthattreathumanswithdignityandrespect?

v WhatstrategiescanIemploytodeterhomophobicbullying?

QuickFactson

HomophobicBullyingin

Schools

OfLGBTstudentssurveyed

intheUnitedStates:v 86.2%reportedverbal

assaultatschool

v 44.1%reportedphysical

harassmentatschool

v 25.1%reported

physicalassaultat

school

v 80%saidtheirteacher

never,orrarely

interrupted

homophobicremarks

FindingsHerearesomecommonwaysschoolsdealwithLGBTissues:

1. Avoidance:Theeasiestwaytodealwithanissueistoignoreit.

Alargenumberofschoolsnationwidedonotevenconsider

homophobiaanissueinschoolordonotacknowledgetheissue

2. Condemnation:LGBTindividualsareseenassinfulorimmoral

inbothpublicandprivateschools3. Marginalization:ConsideringLGBTissuesasunimportantand

lettingthemfalltothewayside

4. Separation:Disconnectinghomophobiaasaformof

discriminationfromrelatedissuessuchassexismorracism

5. Compartmentalization:Resourcesarenotutilizedtodevelop

understanding.HomophobiaandLGBTissuesarelefttoonedisciplinethatoftenhaslimitedresources

6. A-historicalversushistoricalapproach:FocusingonLGBTissuesinthepresentdayandneglectingthelonghistoryof

humanrightsviolationsacrosstheglobe

7. LocalversusGlobal:Viewingtheissueaseitherlocalorglobal,butnotboth

8. Whole-schoolapproach:Utilizationofafterschoolactivities,

research,Gay-StraightAlliances,anti-bullyingcampaigns,guest

speakers,andschoolrulestoprotectLGBTstudentsandcreate

acultureofacceptance,nottolerance.Thesestrategiesrequire

resources,butmayhaveaprofoundimpact

Source:VanDriel,Barry,andMichelleKahn."Homophobia."TeachingControversialIssuesintheClassroom:KeyIssuesandDebates.Ed.PaulaCowanandHenryMaitles.London:Continuum,2012.

Page 2: Controversy in Classrooms

7/28/2019 Controversy in Classrooms

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/controversy-in-classrooms 2/2

 

StrategiesforDeterringHomophobicBullying

HerearesomestrategiesforaddressingLGBTissues:

v Surveystudentstogaugetheirattitudes,knowledge,andmisconceptionsusingnon-threateningquestions(e.g.Inyour

opinion,isthereasocialgroupwhichexperiencesmorediscriminationthanothersocialgroups?).Thesequestionscan

serveasaspringboardfordiscussion,especiallyforthoseteacherswhoarereluctanttobegintheconversationthemselves.

v AssignabookwithacharacterthatidentifiesasLGBTandgaugereactions.

v Discusscurrenteventsandsocialissues,highlightingequal

rightsandprogressmadebytheLGBTcommunity.v Becomeawareofpreviousattemptsinschool(whether

successfulornot)toaddressLGBTissues.Approachother

teachersatschoolwithideastofurthersuccessfulprogramsor

improveunsuccessfulones.

v Takeacross-disciplineapproach,workingwithotherteacherstoanalyzehumanrightsdocumentsanddiscusshumanrights

violationsbothhistoricandpresentday.

v Havestudentspracticedebating,firstwithnon-controversialissues,thenmovetocontroversialissuesoncetheformatis

understood.Questionsshouldbeframedinawaythatwould

notpromoteintolerance.Forexample,asamplequestioncould

be"Doyouagreewiththisstatementthatthebestwaytotackle

homophobiaistohaveazero-tolerancepolicyoninsultinglanguage?"Thegoalistohavestudentsgeneratesolutions

ratherthancontinuetoignoretheproblem.

v Allowstudentstoresearchandpresentfindingsonlaws,

organizations,andmediaregardingLGBTissues.Thisresearch

mayempowerstudentstomakemoreinformeddecisionsaboutwhattheybelieveandhowtheyshouldbehave.

ObservationsFromMy

OwnClassroom

Thisexperiencewas

beneficialtomebecauseI

learnedhowtomoreeffectivelystartaconversationwithmy

studentsabouthomophobic

bullying.Atfirst,Iwasuncomfortable“makingan

issue”ofwhatmystudentssaid.IfIheardastudentusea

homophobicslur,Iwould

ignoreit.Iquicklyrealizedthat

allowingthisbehaviorto

continuewasdetrimentaltomy

LGBTstudents,myown

instruction,andourclassroom

asacommunityofhumanbeings.

Whileresearchingmy

inquiry,Ibecamemorelikelytochallengestudents’useof

homophobicslurs,oftenasking

them“whatdoyoumeanby

that?”orsaying“there’snothing

wrongwithbeingwhoyouare.”Studentresponsestomy

questionsandstatementswere

atfirstrudeanddismissive,butIremainedconsistentinmy

interventions.

Overthecourseoftime,I

noticedstudentswereless

likelytousehomophobicslurs

inclass;theyknewIwouldnot

toleratehatespeechinclass.My

hopeisthattheywilleventually

realizetheconsequencesand

implicationsoflanguageuse,as

Ididnotsolongago.Iwantmystudentstotreateachother

withdignityandrespect,butmostimportantly,Iwant

studentstoseeoneanotherasfellowhumans.