COPYRIGHT AND INFORMATION: LEGAL AND …i390n2pd/sp2005/Copyright... · Web viewCOPYRIGHT: LEGAL AND CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES* INF 390N.2 Unique Number 24995 Dr. Philip Doty School of

COPYRIGHT LEGAL AND CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES

INF 390N2

Unique Number 24995

Dr Philip DotySchool of Information

University of Texas at Austin

Spring 2005

Class time Thursday 900 AM ndash 1200 N

Place SZB 464

Office SZB 570

Office hrs Thursday 100 ndash 200 PM

By appointment other times

Telephone (512) 471-3746 (Direct line)(512) 471-3821 (Main iSchool office)

Internet pdotyischoolutexaseduhttpwwwischoolutexasedu~pdotyindexhtm

Class URL httpwwwischoolutexasedu~i390n2pdsp2005

TA Cheryl Beaverjcherylbeaveryahoocom

Georgia Harper is chief of the intellectual property division of the University of Texas General System Counselrsquos office She and I first taught this course in spring 2004 Although the course has evolved many of its strengths are the result of Georgiarsquos creativity and hard work

Copyright ndash Philip Doty University of Texas at Austin December 2004 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 3

Expectations of studentsrsquo performance 4

Standards for written work 5

Some editing conventions for studentsrsquo papers 9

Grading 10

Texts and other tools 11

List of assignments 12

Outline of course 13

Schedule 15

Assignments 19

Suggestions for writing policy analysis 22

References 25

INTRODUCTION

Copyright Legal and Cultural Perspectives (INF 390N2) examines legal cultural historical literary anthropological public policy and other perspectives on copyright We will use multiple disciplines and their literatures to investigate how copyright in the United States developed and has evolved The cultural commons ideologies of property and protection shared cultural production and identifying and protecting the public interest in information will be major themes of the semesterrsquos work

The course has no prerequisites and is available to graduate students from all departments and schools

The course will closely examine long-standing as well as current controversies in the ownership of so-called intellectual property aiming to prepare students to be competent practitioners in their professions to be informed citizens and to be well-read in the field Students will also develop strategies for professional and personal political action

The course as its title indicates aims to help weave together the study of the law of copyright with the study of cultural categories such as the ldquoauthorrdquo ldquothe workrdquo and ldquocreationrdquo More specifically the course will

Review important court cases in copyright Investigate the history of the concepts of the personal author and the ldquounitary

workrdquo Examine appropriate statutes domestically and internationally as well as major

international copyright conventions Explore the replacement of public law (copyright) by private law (contract and

licensing) Examine the replacement of first sale and ownership by licensing and leasing Consider how copyright privacy and free speech implicate each other Investigate how the international context for copyright figures into its evolution

organizations such as the World Intellectual Property Organization and the World Trade Organization will be especially important here

Explore the implications of the European Unionrsquos moves to copyright databases of ldquofactsrdquo

Consider Enlightenment assumptions about creation knowledge and social life Help students engage papers in law reviews legal journals and other sources Theorize the public domain as a major source of creativity and (shared) cultural

expression Explore ideologies of property especially ldquointellectual propertyrdquo Consider how those ideologies can conflict with the protection of indigenous

peoplersquos interests Give students practice in the application of the law to particular circumstances Consider the strengths and weaknesses of various disciplinary perspectives on

copyright cultural production and property Demonstrate how law evolves and is different across jurisdictions Explore the concept of vicarious liability Make clear that well-informed people may disagree about what reasonable

behaviors related to copyright and what reasonable interpretations of the law may be

EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENTSrsquo PERFORMANCE

Students are expected to be involved creative and vigorous participants in class discussions and in the overall conduct of the class In addition students are expected to

bull Attend all class sessions if a student misses a class it is his or her responsibility to arrange with another student to obtain all notes handouts and assignment sheets The assignments presume that students are familiar with all material discussed in class

bull Read all material prior to class students are expected to use the course readings to inform their classroom participation and their writing assignments Students must learn to integrate what they read with what they say and write This last imperative is essential to the development of professional expertise

bull Educate themselves and their peers Your successful completion of this program and your participation in the information professions depend upon your willingness to demonstrate initiative creativity and responsibility Your participation in the professional and personal growth of your colleagues is essential to their success and your own Such collegiality is at the heart of professional practice Some assignments in this course are designed explicitly to encourage collaboration

bull Spend at least 3-4 hours in preparation for each hour of classroom instruction ie about 10-12 hours per week for the course

bull Participate in all class discussions

bull Hand in all assignments fully and on time -- late assignments will not be accepted except in the particular circumstances noted below

bull Be responsible with collective property especially books and other material on reserve

bull Ask for any explanation and help from the instructor or the Teaching Assistant either in class during office hours on the telephone through email or in any other appropriate way Email is especially appropriate for information questions but please recall that I do not have access to email at home It may be several days after you send email before I see it It is always wise to send a copy of any email intended for the instructor to the TA as well she has access to email more regularly

Academic or scholastic dishonesty such as plagiarism cheating or academic fraud will not be tolerated and will incur the most severe penalties including failure for the course If there is any concern about behavior that may be academically dishonest please consult the instructor Students are also encouraged to refer to the UT General Information Bulletin Appendix C Sections 11-304 and 11-802 and the brochure Texas is the Best HONESTLY (1988) by the Cabinet of College Councils and the Office of the Dean of Students

The instructor is happy to provide all appropriate accommodations for qualified students with documented disabilities and the Universityrsquos Office of the Dean of Students at 4716259 4714641 TTY can provide further information and referrals as necessary

STANDARDS FOR WRITTEN WORK

Review these standards both before and after writing they are used to evaluate your work

You will be expected to meet professional standards of maturity clarity grammar spelling and organization in your written work for this class and to that end I offer the following remarks Every writer is faced with the problem of not knowing what his or her audience knows about the topic at hand therefore effective communication depends upon maximizing clarity As Wolcott reminds us in Writing Up Qualitative Research (1990 p 47) Address the many who do not know not the few who do It is also important to remember that clarity of ideas clarity of language and clarity of syntax are interrelated and mutually reinforcing Good writing makes for good thinking and vice versa Remember that writing is a form of inquiry a way to think not a reflection of some supposed static thought ldquoinrdquo the mind

All written work for the class must be done on a word-processor and double-spaced with 1 margins all the way around and in either 10 or 12 pt font

Certain writing assignments will demand the use of notes (either footnotes or endnotes) and references It is particularly important in professional schools such as the School of Information that notes and references are impeccably done Please use APA (American Psychological Association) standards There are other standard bibliographic and note formats for example in engineering and law but social scientists and a growing number of humanists use APA Familiarity with standard formats is essential for understanding others work and for preparing submissions to journals funding agencies professional conferences and the like You may also consult the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001 5th ed) and httpwebstercommneteduapaapa_indexhtm (a useful if non-canonical source)

Do not use a general dictionary or encyclopedia for defining terms in graduate school or in professional writing If you want to use a reference source to define a term a better choice would be a specialized dictionary such as The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Philosophy or subject-specific encyclopedia eg the International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences The best alternative however is having an understanding of the literature related to the term sufficient to provide a definition in the context of that literature

Use the spell checker in your word processing package to review your documents but be aware that spell checking dictionaries do not include most proper nouns including personal and place names omit most technical terms include very few foreign words and phrases and cannot identify the error in using homophones eg writing there instead of their or in writing the instead of them

It is imperative that you proofread your work thoroughly and be precise in editing it It is often helpful to have someone else read your writing to eliminate errors and to increase clarity Finally each assignment should be handed in with a title page containing your full name the date the title of the assignment and the class number (INF 3902) If you have any questions about these standards I will be pleased to discuss them with you at any time

Remember every assignment must include a title page with

bull The title of the assignment

bull Your name

bull The date

bull The class number ndash INF 3902CONTINUED

STANDARDS FOR WRITTEN WORK (CONTINUED)

Since the production of professional-level written work is one of the aims of the class I will read and edit your work as the editor of a professional journal or the moderator of a technical session at a professional conference would The reminders below will help you prepare professional-level written work appropriate to any situation Note the asterisked errors in s 3 4 8 10 11 14 15 18 20 and 25 (some have more than one error)

1 Staple all papers for this class in the upper left-hand corner Do not use covers binders or other means of keeping the pages together

2 Number all pages after the title page Ordinarily notes and references do NOT count against page limits

3 Use formal academic prose Avoid colloquial language you know It is essential in graduate work and in professional communication to avoid failures in diction -- be serious and academic when called for be informal and relaxed when called for and be everything in between as necessary For this course avoid words and phrases such as agenda problem with deal with handle window of goes into broken down into viable and option

4 Avoid clicheacutes They are vague fail to push the envelope and do not provide relevant input

5 Avoid computer technospeak like input feedback or processing information except when using such terms in specific technical ways similarly avoid using ldquocontentrdquo as a noun

6 Do not use the term relevant except in its information retrieval sense Ordinarily it is a colloquial clicheacute but it also has a strict technical meaning in information studies

7 Do not use quality as an adjective it is vague clicheacute and colloquial Instead use high-quality excellent superior or whatever more formal phrase you deem appropriate

8 Study the APA style convention for the proper use of ellipsis

9 Avoid using the terms objective and subjective in their evidentiary senses these terms entail major philosophical epistemological controversy Avoid terms such as facts factual proven and related constructions for similar reasons

10 Avoid contractions Dont use them in formal writing

11 Be circumspect in using the term this especially in the beginning of a sentence THIS is often a problem because the referent is unclear Pay strict attention to providing clear referents for all pronouns Especially ensure that pronouns and their referents agree in number eg each person went to their home is a poor construction because each is a singular form as is the noun person while their is a plural form Therefore either the referent or the pronoun must change in number

12 ldquoIf ordinarily takes the subjunctive mood eg If he were [not was] only taller

13 Put only in its appropriate place near the word it modifies For example it is appropriate in spoken English to say that he only goes to Antones when you mean that the only place he frequents is Antones In written English however the sentence should read he goes only to Antones

CONTINUED

14 Do not confuse possessive plural or contracted forms especially of pronouns Its bad

15 Do not confuse affecteffect complimentcomplement or principleprincipal Readers will not complement your work or its principle affect on them

16 Avoid misplaced modifiers eg it is inappropriate to write the following sentence As someone interested in the history of Mesoamerica it was important for me to attend the lecture The sentence is inappropriate because the phrase As someone interested in the history of Mesoamerica is meant to modify the next immediate word which should then obviously be both a person and the subject of the sentence It should modify the word I by preceding it immediately One good alternative for the sentence is As someone interested in the history of Mesoamerica I was especially eager to attend the lecture

17 Avoid use of valid parameter bias reliability and paradigm except in limited technical ways These are important research terms and should be used with precision

18 Remember that the words data media criteria strata and phenomena are all PLURAL forms They TAKES plural verbs If you use any of these plural forms in a singular construction eg the data is you will make the instructor very unhappy -(

19 Number many and fewer are used with plural nouns (a number of horses many horses and fewer horses) ldquoAmount much and less are used with singular nouns (an amount of hydrogen much hydrogen and less hydrogen) Another useful way to make this distinction is to recall that many is used for countable nouns while much is used for uncountable nouns

20 The passive voice should generally not be used

21 Between is used with two alternatives while among is used with three or more

22 Generally avoid the use of honorifics such as Mister Doctor Ms and so on when referring to persons in your writing especially when citing their written work Use last names and dates as appropriate in APA

23 There is no generally accepted standard for citing electronic resources If you cite them give an indication as specifically as possible of

- responsibility (who)- title (what)- date of creation (when)- date viewed (when)- place to find the source (where how)

See the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001 5th ed pp 213-214 231 and 268-281) for a discussion of citing electronic material and useful examples Also see Web Extension to American Psychological Association Style (WEAPAS) at httpwwwbeadslandcomweapasSCRIBE

24 Cite is a verb citation is a noun similarly quote is a verb quotation is a noun

25 PROFREAD PROOFREED PROOOFREAD

CONTINUED

26 Use double quotation marks (ldquoabcrdquo) not single quotation marks (lsquoxyzrsquo) as a matter of course Single quotation marks are to be used to indicate quotations within quotations

27 Provide a specific page number for all direct quotations If the quotation is from a Web page or other digital source provide at least the paragraph number andor other directional cues eg ldquo(Davis 1993 section II para 4)rdquo

28 In ordinary American English as ne because

29 Use about instead of the tortured locution as to

30 In much of social science and humanistic study the term issue is used in a technical way to identify sources of public controversy or dissensus Please use the term to refer to topics about which there is substantial public disagreement NOT synonymously with general terms such as area topic or the like

31 ldquoImpactrdquo is a noun so is ldquoresearchrdquo

32 Please do not start a sentence or any independent clause with ldquohoweverrdquo

33 Avoid the use of ldquoetcrdquo ndash it is awkward colloquial and vague

34 Do not use the term ldquosubjectsrdquo to describe research participants ldquoRespondentsrdquo ldquoparticipantsrdquo and ldquoinformantsrdquo are preferred and have been for decades

35 Do not use notes unless absolutely necessary but if you must use them use endnotes not footnotes

SOME EDITING CONVENTIONS FOR STUDENTSrsquo PAPERS

Symbol Meaning

number OR insert a space context will help you decipher its meaning

AWK awkward and usually compromises clarity as well

block make into a block quotation without external quotation marks do so with quotations ge 4 lines

caps capitalize

COLLOQ colloquial and to be avoided

dB database

FRAG sentence fragment often that means that the verb andor subject of the sentence is missing

j journal

lc make into lower case

libship librarianship

org orgrsquol organization organizational

PL plural

Q question

Qrsquonaire questionnaire

REF what is the referent of this pronoun to what or whom does it refer

RQ research question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

I also use check marks to indicate that the writer has made an especially good point and wavy lines under or next to a term to indicate that the usage is suspect

GRADING

The grading system for this class includes the following grades

A+ Extraordinarily high achievementA SuperiorA- ExcellentB+ GoodB SatisfactoryB- Barely satisfactoryC+ UnsatisfactoryC UnsatisfactoryC- UnsatisfactoryD UnacceptableF Unacceptable and failing

See the memorandum from former Dean Brooke Sheldon dated August 13 1991 and the notice in the School of Information student orientation packets for explanations of this system Students should consult the iSchool Web site (httpwwwischoolutexaseduprogramsindexhtml) and the Graduate School Catalogue (eg httpwwwutexasedustudentregistrarcatalogsgrad03-05ch1ch1ahtmlnature and httpwwwutexasedustudentregistrarcatalogsgrad03-05ch1ch1bhtmlstudent) for more on standards of work The University of Texas does not yet use the +- grading system that we do at the iSchool UT accepts only full letter grades Therefore for example a B- and B+ final grade at the iSchool both translate to a final grade of B at the University level

A grade of B signals acceptable satisfactory performance in graduate school In this class the grade of A is reserved for students who demonstrate not only a command of the concepts and techniques discussed but also an ability to synthesize and integrate them in a professional manner and communicate them effectively

The grade of incomplete (X) is reserved for students in extraordinary circumstances and must be negotiated with the instructor before the end of the semester See the former Deans memorandum of August 13 1991 available from the main iSchool office

I use points to evaluate assignments not letter grades Points on any assignment are determined using an arithmetic not a proportional algorithm For example 1420 points on an assignment does NOT translate to 70 of the credit or a D Instead 1420 points is very roughly equivalent to a B If any students semester point total gt 90 (is equal to or greater than 90) then she will have earned an A of some kind If the semester point total gt 80 then she will have earned at least a B of some kind Whether these are A+ A A- B+ B or B- depends upon the comparison of point totals for all students For example if a student earns 90 points and the highest point total in the class is 98 the student would earn an A- If on the

other hand a student earns 90 points and the highest point total in the class is 91 then the student would earn an A This system will be further explained throughout the semester

TEXTS AND OTHER TOOLS

There are four required texts for this class all four can be purchased at the Co-op on Guadalupe

Boyle James (1996) Shamans software amp spleens Law and the construction of the information society Cambridge MA Harvard University Press

Goldstein Paul (2003) Copyrightrsquos highway From Gutenberg to the celestial jukebox (rev ed) Stanford CA Stanford University

Lessig Lawrence (2001) The future of ideas The fate of the commons in a connected world New York Random House

Vaidhyanathan Siva (2004) The anarchist in the library How the clash between freedom and control is hacking the real world and crashing the system New York Basic Books

There are four recommended texts as well

Lessig Lawrence (2004) Free culture How big media uses [sic] technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity New York Penguin

Litman Jessica (2001) Digital copyright Amherst NY Prometheus Books

Russell Carrie (2004) Complete copyright An everyday guide for librarians Washington DC American Library Association Office for Information Technology Policy

Vaidhyanathan Siva (2001) Copyrights and copywrongs The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity New York New York University Press

Additional readings will be available online andor on reserve at PCL

The course Web site including Blackboard as well as direct email messages will be used to inform students of changes in the course schedule discuss assignments and so on Both means can be used by all course participants to communicate with each other pass along information regarding interesting events and resources and the like

By the second class please subscribe to two lists that feature discussions about copyright

Coalition for Networked Information copyright list httpwwwcniorgforumscni-copyrightcni-copyrighthtml

[send subscription message to cni-copyright-subscribecniorg -- see the Web site]

Politech -- httppolitechbotcommailmanlistinfopolitech

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

The instructors will provide additional information about each assignment Written assignments are to be word-processed and double-spaced in 10- or 12-point font with 1 margins Assignments are due in class except for the online assignments

Assignment Date Due Percent of Grade

In-class preparation and participation ----- 10

Leading in-class discussion GROUP FEB 1025

FEB 24MAR 31

Analysis of Eldred v Ashcroft FEB 1710(3-5 pp)

Review of Vaidhyanathan (2004) MAR 24 15(5-7 pp)

Identification and approval of topic for final paper MAR 24 ---

Choice of classmatersquos paper to review APR 14---

Draft of final paper (ge10 pp) APR 21---

Peer review of classmatersquos draft (3-4 pp) APR 2810

Final paper (20-25 pp) MAY 5 30

In-class presentation APR 21 28 ---MAY 5

All assignments must be handed in on time and the instructors reserves the right to issue a course grade of F if any assignment is not completed Late assignments will not be accepted unless three criteria are met

1 At least 24 hours before the date due the instructors gives explicit permission to the student to hand the assignment in late

2 At the same time a specific date and time are agreed upon for the late submission

3 The assignment is then submitted on or before the agreed-upon date and time

The first criterion can be met only in the most serious of health family or personal situations

All of your assignments should adhere to the standards for written work should be clear succinct and specific and should be explicitly grounded in the readings class discussions and other sources as appropriate You will find it particularly useful to write multiple drafts of your papers

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Meeting Date Topics and assignments

1 JAN 20 Introduction to the course and review of the syllabusIntroduction to the concept of ldquointellectual propertyrdquoThe exclusive rights of rightsholdersExceptions to these exclusive rights

2 JAN 27 Origins of US copyright lawHow to find read and summarize a copyright caseHow to find read and summarize a copyright statute

3 FEB 3 Invention of the author and the idea of the unitary work

4 FEB 10 Student-led discussion ndash International copyright treaties and organizations GRP

5 FEB 17 Fair useFour-factor fair use test Guidelines and application to

different mediaWill fair use survive

bull Due Analysis of Eldred v Ashcroft (10 3-5 pp)

6 FEB 24 Student-led discussion ndash The public domain and its enclosure GRP

Discussion of studentsrsquo papers

7 MAR 3 First saleWhat does it meanWhat have been its origin and its purpose

8 MAR 10 The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)ProvisionsAnti-circumventionThreats to fair use and other statutory exemptionsLegislative history

Mar 17 Spring Break No class

9 MAR 24 Copyleft and the creative commons

bull Due Review of Vaidhyanathan (2004) (15) (5-7 pp)

bull Due Identification and approval of topic for final paper

10 MAR 31 Student-led discussion Indigenous peoplersquos interests GRP

11 APR 7 Copyright and privacy Copyright and free speech

12 APR 14 Uniform Commercial CodeUniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA)Contracts and licenses replacing copyright law and first

saleVicarious liability

bull Due Choice of classmatersquos paper to review

13 APR 21 Paper presentations

bull Due Draft of final paper (ge10 pp)

bull Due Peer review of classmatersquos draft (10) (3-4 pp)

15 MAY 5 Course evaluationSummary and trends

Paper presentations

bull Due Final paper (30) (20-25 pp)

SCHEDULE

This schedule is tentative and may be adjusted as the class progresses GRP indicates a group assignment and AS indicates additional sources The various court cases and portions of the US Code can be found online

DATE TOPICS ASSIGNMENTS AND READINGS

JAN 20 Introduction to the course and review of the syllabusIntroduction to the concept of ldquointellectual propertyrdquoThe exclusive rights of rightsholdersExceptions to these exclusive rights

READ Copyright Act (see US Copyright Office 2004) onlinePyle (1989) onlineCopyright Act sectsect 106 106A 107 108 109 110 121 (skim)Miller amp Davis (1990 pp 323-339)

AS GartnerG2 amp Berkman Center (2003 pp 1-30)

SUBSCRIBE CNI-COPYRIGHT-digestcniorgPolitech

JAN 27 Origins of US copyright lawHow to find read and summarize a copyright caseHow to find read and summarize a copyright statute

READ Copyright Act sectsect 104 104A (see US Copyright Office 2004) online

Copyright Act Sections sectsect106 106A online Copyright Section 163 National Copyright Traditions

(Goldstein)Association of Research Libraries (ARL) (2002) [Timeline ]

onlineCampbell v Acuff-Rose Music (1994)MGM Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd (pending)

AS Kimber 2003 onlineMartin (2003) onlineMohr (2002) onlineGreenwich Workshop Inc v Tinker Creations (1996)Lee v ART Co 1997)

FEB 3 Invention of the author and the idea of the unitary work

READ Boyle (1996) Chapters 6 10 and 11Woodmansee (1994)OTA (1986) Summary onlineBarthes (1977) onlineFoucault (1979)Klages (2001) online

FEB 10 Student-led discussion ndash International copyright treaties and organizations GRP

READ Carroll (2004) online Goldstein (2003) Chapter 5

FEB 17 Fair useFour-factor fair use test Guidelines and application to different

mediaWill fair use survive

READ Boyle (1996) Chapters 3 4 and 5Eldred v Ashcroft 537 (2003) [read majority + both dissents]Miller amp Davis (1990 pp 354-375)Copyright Act sect 107Harper (2002) onlineARLALA et al (2003) onlineHarper amp Row Publishers Inc v Nation Enterprises Inc (1985)Princeton University Press v Michigan Document Services (1996)American Geophysical Union v Texaco (1994)Duke Law Center for the Public Domain (2004) onlineIllegal Art (2003) onlineSlater (2003) online

AS Ad Hoc Committee (1976)Crews (1996)

FEB 24 Student-led discussion ndash The public domain and its enclosure GRP

[copyrighting databases]

READ Lessig (2001a) Preface and Chapters 1-8Rose (2002) onlineBoyle (2003b) onlineCopyright Act sectsect 101 102 103 302 303 304 305Feist v Rural Telephone (1991)Miller amp Davis (1990 pp 285-310)

AS Lange (2003)National Research Council (1999)Nimmer amp Krauthaus (1992)Satava v Lowry (2003)Clifford (2003)

MAR 3 First saleWhat does it meanWhat was its originWhat have its purposes been

READ Copyright Act sectsect 108 and 109Minow (1996-2003) onlineMayfield (2004)Hedstrom (nd) online

Interlibrary loan guidelines (1976) onlineGasaway (1999) onlineAmerican Association of Law Libraries (2002) onlinePalmedo (2001) onlineHyde (2001) online

MAR 10 The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)ProvisionsAnti-circumventionThreats to fair use and other statutory exemptionsLegislative history

READ Goldstein (2003) Chapters 4 and 6Copyright Act sectsect 1201 and 1202Legislative history of the anti-circumvention provisions (nd)

onlineElectronic Frontier Foundation (2003) onlineSony v Universal City Studios (1984)Universal Studios v Corley (2001)US v Elcom Ltd (2002)Lessig (2001b)

AS Molina (2003) online

MAR 24 Copyleft and the creative commons

READ Lessig (2001a) Chapters 9-15Free Software Foundation (2004) onlineCreative Commons (2004) online passim

AS Fisher (2004) passim

MAR 31 Student-led discussion Indigenous peoplersquos interests GRP

READ Wardrop (2002) onlineWorld Intellectual Property Organization (c 2004) online

AS Caslon Analytics (2004) onlineAustrailan Attorney-General (1994) online

APR 7 Copyright and privacy Copyright and free speech

READ Lemley amp Volokh (1998) onlineRubenfeld (2002) onlineLessig (1999a)Netanel (2001) onlineStefik (1996a)Stefik (1996b)

AS Lessig (1999b)Intellectual Reserve Inc v Utah Lighthouse Ministry Inc (1999)Recording Industry Association of America v Verizon Internet

Services (2003)

APR 14 Uniform Commercial CodeUniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA)Contracts and licenses replacing copyright law and first sale

Vicarious liability

READ ALA (2001a) UCITA site online passimALA (2001b) onlineALA (2001c) onlineLochner v New York 98 US 45 (1905)Lemley amp Reese (2004) online

AS McGowan (2004)Baystate v Bowers Discussion (2003)

APR 21 Paper presentations

MAY 5 Course evaluationSummary and trends

Paper presentations

READ Boyle (1996) Chapter 13 Conclusion and Appendix AGoldstein (2003) Chapter 7Oberholzer amp Strumpf (2004) onlineLemley (2004) onlineStallman (1996) onlineBoyle (1997) online

AS Negativland (2004) onlineLitman (1992) onlineGartnerG2 amp Berkman Center (2003 pp 31-45) onlineCopyright Clearance Center (2005) online

ASSIGNMENTS

Leading in-class discussion GROUP (25) ndash due FEB 10 (8) FEB 24 (22) MAR 31 (29)

Each student will self-select into one group of 4-5 students to lead class discussions on these dates

February 10 International copyright treaties and organizations

February 24 The public domain and its enclosure

March 31 Indigenous peoplersquos interests

There are four elements of this assignment

Each team will prepare three or four questions to help facilitate the classroom discussion and these questions should be posted to the BlackBoard site in the appropriate forum no later than 1200 N the Tuesday before class ie February 8 February 22 and March 29 Each team should work as a group to develop these questions and the other members of the class should check the forum before class to prepare for the discussion The discussion leaders may want to prepare a handout with the questions to distribute in class

The instructor will make a few comments (perhaps 10-15 minutesrsquo worth) before turning the class over to each team to lead the discussion for the rest of the class Each member of the team should assume roughly the same amount of leadership in the class no one should dominate the conversation Be prepared to run class for two hours ndash for about an hour up to the break and then for another hour after the break

Each team should also distribute in class an annotated bibliography of ten (10) items germane to the dayrsquos discussion The annotations should be about 3-4 sentences long and should be very specific about the sourcesrsquo value to the dayrsquos topic The team should distribute a paper copy of the annotated bibliography to each member of the class and give two paper copies to the instructor

The team should post the annotated bibliography in the appropriate BlackBoard forum no later than 900 AM the day of class

The discussion questions and facilitating the discussion will be worth 10 of your grade while the annotated bibliography will be worth 15 of your grade All members of the group will receive the same grade for both elements of the assignment

The most important word of advice I can offer is to remind you to facilitate the discussion not monopolize it ndash get your classmates involved

Analysis of Eldred v Ashcroft (10) ndash due FEB 17

Each student will write an analysis of Eldred v Ashcroft (2003) emphasizing the strengths of the respondentrsquos (the federal governmentrsquos) case Another way to think of the assignment is to consider the question what are the public benefits of

stronger copyright protections for longer terms Use the specifics of the governmentrsquos argument and those of supporting parties and you may find it helpful to include arguments from other proponents of strong copyright in this assignment eg Goldstein (1992 and 2003) US Department of Justice (2004) Ashcroft (2004) and Information Infrastructure Task Force (1995 also known as the Lehman Report or the White Paper) The analysis should be 3-5 double-spaced pp long and posted to Blackboard in the appropriate forum This analysis is due no later than 800 AM Thursday February 10 Also hand in a paper copy of your analysis in class

Review of Vaidhyanathan (2004) (15) ndash due MAR 24

For this assignment students will write a well-integrated review of Vaidhyanathan (2004) The Anarchist in the Library The review should be 5 - 7 double-spaced pages long

Write for the non-specialist with an interest in copyright eg a professional colleague with no specialized legal historical or technical knowledge Remember to review the book written not a book you think should have been written Be sure to explain and clarify all important concepts acronyms organizations and so on

You may want to look at a few models of formal academic book reviews and I expect that the reviews will meet the standards of the best general interest and academic journals Your review should include specific consideration of sources we have read class discussions and other material from the course you regard as appropriate

Be especially careful to avoid plagiarism

Final paper and peer review of classmatersquos draft (40) ndash due APR 21 APR 28 MAY 5

Each student will choose one aspect of the copyright regime in the US to write about at length but you may find it helpful to remember our legal and cultural emphases this semester Your final paper should be 20-25 double-spaced pp

There are six deadlines for this assignment the last of which is variable

Identification and approval of topic ndash due MAR 24

Each student must submit a topic for the final paper for approval of the instructor no later than March 24 Post a note to the appropriate forum in BlackBoard so that the class can review them as well The topic can be related to the texts we have read cases we have reviewed or material we have not explicitly covered in our semesterrsquos work Useful sources for ideas include class readings and additional sources in the syllabus your own knowledge of copyright discussion with the instructor and your colleagues (both inside and outside of the class) reading ahead in the syllabus to identify upcoming topics the mass media Web and other Internet sources and the bibliographies of what you read

Do not limit your consideration of topics to those in the early part of the semester ndash the more initiative you take in identifying a topic of interest to you the better the final product will be

Choice of classmatersquos paper to review ndash due APR 14

No later than April 14 each student will choose to be a peer reviewer for another studentrsquos final paper While the choices will generally be on a first-come-first-served basis the instructor reserves the right to assign partners for appropriate reasons Students will notify the instructor by private email about their choices and will receive replies about them

Draft of final paper ndash due APR 21 -- ge 10 pp

Each student will turn in two copies of a draft of the final paper for the course on April 21 One copy will be for the peer reviewer while the other will be for the instructor This draft should be a minimum of 10 double-spaced pp containing all the elements of the final paper including a one-page abstract

Peer review of classmatersquos draft (10) ndash due APR 28 ndash 3-4 pp

Each individual student will review another studentrsquos draft and submit two copies of a three- to four-page double-spaced critique of the paper one to the student who wrote the draft and one to the instructor Be specific in your critique -- what works in the draft What does not Why or why not What specific suggestions can you offer for improvement to the paper whether about the topic the argument definitions organization sources composition citations lay-out and so on Help your classmates improve their work ndash this kind of review is one of the primary characteristics of professional life

In-class presentation ndash (APR 1) APR 21 APR 28 or MAY 5

Each student will make a 20-minute oral presentation about the final paper While the presentation will be informal and ungraded you should plan to use visuals and handouts as appropriate both Wintel and Mac computers will be available as will an Internet connection and a LitePro Each peer editor will act as first respondent to the presentation The dates for the presentations are April 21 April 28 and May 5 Please notify me of your preference for presentation dates no later than Wednesday April 1

Final paper (30) ndash due MAY 5 ndash 20-25 pp

This is a final paper of 20-25 double-spaced pages that considers any approved topic in copyright Your paper should be both analytic and holistic and include a one-page abstract Remember to look at three sections in the syllabus (1) Analysis in Reading Writing and Presenting (2) Standards for Written Work and (3) Suggestions for Writing Policy Analysis

Although your paper need not follow the policy analytic models fully it should be informed by the systematic consideration of public conflicts that policy analysis provides Pertinent policy instruments stake holders and recommendations to resolve conflicts are of particular interest

Hand in two copies of your paper in the last class May 5

SUGGESTIONS FOR WRITING POLICY ANALYSIS

This section of the syllabus offers three general interrelated models for doing policy analysis and then writing policy reports beyond that offered in Majchrzak (1984) You can use these to guide your own writing as your study of copyright and policy analysis progresses beyond this semester but they are also useful for evaluating the work of others Such evaluations are common in policy studies whether for critique literature review or formal peer review Policy analysts constantly review each othersrsquo work in a collegial but rigorous way

The first model is based on one offered by Charles R McClure with my own modifications added Particular analysts and topics may demand different approaches

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

Importance of specific topicDefinition of key termsKey stakeholdersKey policy areas needing analysis and resolution

bull Overview of current knowledge

Evaluative review of the literature about the topic including print and electronic sources

bull Existing policy related to the topic

The most important legislative judicial and regulatory policy instrumentsAmbiguities conflicts problems and contradictions related to the instruments

bull Key issues

Underlying assumptionsEffects on and roles of key stakeholdersConflicts among key valuesImplications of issues

bull Conclusions and recommendations

RecommendationsRationale for recommendationsImplications and possible outcomes of specific courses of action

bull References

APA styleAll sources cited in the paper

Bardach (2000) is the source for the second approach to doing policy analysis His book is entitled A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving As such the first two thirds of his book focuses on this ldquoeightfold pathrdquo in a way reminiscent of Majchrzak (1984) Bardach identifies eight steps in policy analysis (using his words)

Define the problem

Assemble some evidence

Construct the alternatives (for action)

Select the criteria

Project the outcomes

Confront the trade-offs

Decide

Tell your story

Despite his somewhat misplaced emphasis on problem solving (see eg Schoumln 1993) and an implicit linearity he uses to characterize policy analysis his book is very useful for understanding the overwhelming importance of (1) narrative in the process of policy analysis (2) iteration in analysis and (3) clarity in argumentation Bardach also gives some important insights into the contributions of econometric analysis to policy studies

The third model is based primarily on the work of William Dunn with contributions from the work of Ray Rist on qualitative policy research methods Emery Roe on narrative policy analysis and Donald Schoumln on generative metaphor I avoid the rhetoric of problems and problem solving deliberately see eg Doty (2001b)

Elements of the policy issue paper (adapted from Dunn 1994 with material from Rist 1994 Roe 1994 and Schoumln 1993)

Element Examples of Evaluative Criteria

Executive summary

Background of the issue or dilemma

Description of the social dilemma Outcomes of earlier efforts to address

the dilemma

Scope and severity of the conflict

Assessment of past policy efforts Significance of the conflict Need for analysis

Issue statement

Definition of the issue Major stakeholders Goals and objectives Measures of effectiveness Potential ldquosolutionsrdquo or new understandings

Policy alternatives

Description of alternatives Comparison of future outcomes Externalities Constraints and political feasibility

Policy recommendations

Criteria for recommending alternatives Descriptions of preferred alternative(s) Outline of implementation strategy Limitations and possible unanticipated

outcomes

References

Appendices

Are recommendations highlighted

Are all the important terms clearly defined

Are all appropriate dimensions describedAre prior efforts clearly assessed

Why is the social conflict importantWhat are the major assumptions and

questions to be considered

Is the issue clearly statedAre all major stakeholders identified and

prioritizedIs the approach to analysis clearly specifiedAre goals and objectives clearly specifiedAre major value conflicts identified and

described

Are alternatives compared in terms of costs and effectiveness

Are alternatives systematically compared in terms of political feasibility

Are all relevant criteria clearly specifiedIs a strategy for implementation clearly

specifiedAre there adequate provisions for

monitoring and evaluating policies particularly unintended consequences

REFERENCES

I References in the schedule and assignments

American Association of Law Libraries (2002) First sale The basics httpwwwaallnetorgcommitteecopyrightpagesissuesfirstsalehtml

American Geophysical Union v Texaco 60 F3d 913 (2d Cir 1994)httpwwwlawcornelleducopyrightcases60_F3d_913htm

American Library Association (2001a) UCITA (the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act) Concerns for libraries and the public httpwwwalaorgwashoffucitaindexhtml

American Library Association (2001b) UCITA 101 What you should know about the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act httpwwwalaorgwashoffucitaucita101html

American Library Association (2001c) Problems with a non-negotiated contract httpwwwalaorgwashoffucitacontracthtml

ARLALA et al (2003) Fair use and the development of e-reserve systemshttpwwwutsystemeduogcintellectualpropertyfairusereserveshtm

Ashcroft John (2004 October 12) Prepared remarks Release of the report of the Department of Justicersquos Task Force on Intellectual Property httpwwwusdojgovagspeeches2004agremarkspriphtm

Association of Research Libraries (2002) Timeline A history of copyright in the United States httparlcniorginfofrncopytimelinehtml

Bardach Eugene (2000) A practical guide for policy analysis The eightfold path to more effective problem solving New York Chatham House

Barthes Roland (1977) Death of the author (Trans Stephen Heath) In Stephen Heath (Ed) Image music text (pp 142-148) New York Hill and Wang httpfacultysmuedudfostertheoryBartheshtm

Boyle James (1996) Shamans software amp spleens Law and the construction of the information society Cambridge MA Harvard University

Boyle James (1997) A politics of intellectual property Environmentalism for the net httpwwwlawdukeeduboylesiteintprophtm

Boyle James (2003b) Foreword The opposite of property In James Boyle (Ed) Collected papers Duke conference on the public domain (pp 1-32) Durham NC Center for the Public Domain [This monograph also appeared as a special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1-2) 1-483]

Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music 510 US 569 (1994) httpsupctlawcornelledusupcthtml92-1292ZShtml

Carroll Terry (2004) Copyright law FAQ (46) International aspects httpwwwfaqsorgfaqslawcopyrightfaqpart4

Creative Commons (2004) httpcreativecommonsorg

Doty Philip (2001) Policy analysis and networked information ldquoThere are eight million stories rdquo In Charles R McClure amp John Carlo Bertot (Eds) Evaluating networked information services Techniques policy and issues (pp 213-253) Medford NJ Information Today

Duke Law Center for the Public Domain (2004) Arts Project Moving Image Contest httpwwwlawdukeeducspdcontestfinalists

Dunn William N (1994) Public policy analysis An introduction (2nd ed) Englewood Cliffs NJ Prentice-Hall

Eldred v Ashcroft 537 US______ (2003) [read majority + both dissents] httpsupctlawcornelledusupcthtml01-618ZShtml

Electronic Frontier Foundation (2003 September 24) Unintended consequences Five years under the DMCA (version 3) httpwwwefforgIPDMCAunintended_consequencesphp

Feist v Rural Telephone 499 US 340 (1991) httpwwwlawcornelleducopyrightcases499_US_340htm

Foucault Michel (1984) What is an author In Paul Rabinow (Ed) The Foucault reader (pp 101-120) New York Pantheon Books

Free Software Foundation (2004) GNUs not Unix httpwwwgnuorghomehtml

Gasaway Laura N (1999) Copyright considerations for fee-based document delivery services httpwwwuncedu~unclngfee-basedhtm

Goldstein Paul (1992) Copyright Law amp Contemporary Problems 55(2) 79-92 httpwwwheinonlineorgHOLPagecollection=lcpcfamphandle=heinjournalslcp55ampid=417ampsize=2amprot=0amptype=image

Harper Georgia (2002) Fair use of copyrighted materials httpwwwutsystemeduogcintellectualpropertycopypol2htm

Harper amp Row Publishers Inc v Nation Enterprises Inc 471 US 539 (1985) httpwwwbcedubc_orgavpcascommfree_speechharperandrowhtml

Hedstrom Margaret (nd) Digital preservation A time bomb for digital libraries httpwwwukyedu~kiernanDLhedstromhtml

Hyde Bob (2001)The first sale doctrine and digital phonorecords Duke Law amp Technology Review 18 httpwwwlawdukeedujournalsdltrarticles2001dltr0018html

Illegal art (2003) httpwwwillegal-artorg

Information Infrastructure Task Force Information Policy Working Committee Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1995 September) Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure The report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights httpwwwusptogovwebipnii [Lehman Report also known as the White Paper]

Interlibrary Loan Guidelines [CONTU Guidelines] (1976) Published in US Congress Conference Report HR 94-1733 httpwwwuncedu~unclngILL-guidelineshtm

Klages Mary (2001) Michel Foucault ldquoWhat is an authorrdquo httpwwwcoloradoeduEnglishENGL2012Klagesfoucaulthtml

Legislative history of anti-circumvention provisions (nd) httpwww2arinethrrchtml_black_box__legislative_historhtml

Lemley Mark A (2004) Property intellectual property and free riding John M Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No 291 Stanford Law School [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- httpwwwssrncomindex_sfhtml] httpssrncomabstract=582602

Lemley Mark amp Reese R Anthony (2004) Reducing copyright infringement without restricting innovation Stanford Law Review 56(6) 1345-1434 [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- httpwwwssrncomindex_sfhtml] httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=525662

Lemley Mark A amp Volokh Eugene (1998) Freedom of speech and injunctions in intellectual property cases Duke Law Journal 48(2) 147-242 [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- httpwwwssrncomindex_sfhtml] httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=85608

Lessig Lawrence (1999a) Privacy Chapter 11 in Code and other laws of cyberspace (pp 142-163 271-275) New York Basic Books

Lessig Lawrence (1999b) Free speech Chapter 12 in Code and other laws of cyberspace (pp 164-185 275-281) New York Basic Books

Lessig Lawrence (2001a) The future of ideas The fate of the commons in a connected world New York Random House

Lessig Lawrence (2001b) Jail time in the digital age First published as an editorial in the New York Times (2001 July 30) httpwwwefforgIPDMCAUS_v_Elcomsoft20010730_lessig_opedhtml

Lochner v New York 98 US 45 (1905)httpwww2lawcornelleducgi-binfoliocgiexehistoricquery=5BGroup+198+US+455D(5BLevel+Case+Citation5D7C5BGroup+citemenu5D)doc7B17Dhit_headingswords=4hits_only

Majchrzak Ann (1984) Methods for policy research Newbury Park CA Sage

Mayfield Kendra (2004) Digitizing archives not so easyhttpwwwwiredcomnewsprint012944284200html

MGM Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd httpwwwefforgIPP2PMGM_v_Grokster

Miller Arthur amp Davis Michael H (1990) Intellectual property Patents trademarks and copyright in a nutshell (2nd ed) St Paul MN West

Minow Mary (1996-2003) Library digitization projects and copyright httpwwwllrxcomfeaturesdigitization3htm

Netanel Neil Weinstock (2001) Locating copyright within the First Amendment skein Stanford Law Review 54(1) 1-86 [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- httpwwwssrncomindex_sfhtml] httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=267848

Oberholzer Felix amp Strumpf Koleman (2004) The effect of file sharing on record sales An empirical analysis httpwwwnberorg~confer2004URCs04felixpdf

Palmedo Michael (2001) Letter to Maneesha Mithal Bureau of Consumer Protection Federal Trade Commission httpwwwcptechorgecomjurisdictionftc-hague12072001html

Pyle Christopher (1989) How to brief a case httpwwwlibjjaycunyeduresearchbriefhtml (Original published 1982)

Princeton University Press v Michigan Document Services 99 F3d 1381 (6th Cir 1996)httpwwwlawemoryedu6circuitnov9696a0357p06html

Rist Ray C (2000) Influencing the policy process with qualitative research In Norman K Denzin amp Yvonna S Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd

ed pp 1001-1017) Thousand Oaks CA Sage

Roe Emery (1994) Narrative policy analysis Theory and practice Durham NC Duke University

Rose Mark (2002) Copyright and its metaphors UCLA Law Review 50(1) 1-15 httpheinonlineorgHOLPagehandle=heinjournalsuclalr50ampid=15ampcollection=journals

Rubenfeld Jed (2002) The freedom of imagination Copyrightrsquos constitutionality Yale Law Journal 112 (1) 1-60 Also available at httpwwwyaleeduyalelj112112-1ab1html

Satava v Lowry 323 F3d 805 (9th Cir 2003) cert den httpwwwlawcornelleducopyrightcases323_F3d_805htm

Schoumln Donald A (1993) Generative metaphor A perspective on problem-setting in social policy In Andrew Ortony (Ed) Metaphor and thought (2nd ed pp 137-163) Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press

Slater Derek (2003) Take another little piece of my art [review of Illegal Art] httpcreativecommonsorggetcontentfeaturesillegalart

Sony v Universal City Studios 464 US 417 (1984) httpwwwefforgLegalCasessony_v_universal_decisionhtml

Stallman Richard (1997) The right to read Communications of the ACM 40(2) 85-87 httpportalacmorgcitationcfmid=253726ampjmp=citampdl=ACMampdl=ACMampCFID=wwwlibutexasedu9003sfx_localampCFTOKEN=wwwlibutexasedu9003sfx_localCIT

Stefik Mark (1999a) The bit and the pendulum Balancing the interests of stakeholders in digital publishing Chapter 4 in The Internet edge Social legal and technological challenges for a networked world (pp 79-106 and 302-303) Cambridge MA MIT Press

Stefik Mark (1999b) The digital keyhole Privacy rights and trusted systems Chapter 9 in The Internet edge Social legal and technological challenges for a networked world (pp 197-231 and 305-307) Cambridge MA MIT Press

Universal Studios v Corley 273 F3d 429 (2d Cir 2001) httpwwwndedu~pbelliacorleypdf

U S Congress Copyright Office (2004) Copyright of the United Stateshttpwwwcopyrightgovtitle17

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1986) Summary In Intellectual property rights in an age of electronics and information (pp 3-15) Washington DC Government Printing Office httpwwwwwsPrincetonEDU~otans20alpha_fhtml

US Department of Justice (2004) Report of the Department of Justicersquos task force on intellectual property httpwwwusdojgovcriminalcybercrimeIPTaskForceReportpdf [see Ashcroft (2004)]

US v Elcom Ltd 203 FSupp 2d 1111 (ND Cal 2002) httpwwwdigital-law-onlinecomcases62PQ2D1736htm

Wardrop Martin (2002) Copyright and intellectual property protection for indigenous heritage In Aboriginal Art Online httpwwwaboriginalartonlinecomforumdebatephp

Woodmansee Martha (1994) On the author effect Recovering collectivity In Martha Woodmansee amp Peter Jaszi (Eds) The construction of authorship Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp 15-28) Durham NC Duke University

World Intellectual Property Organization (c 2004) Intellectual property and traditional knowledge httpwwwwipointtkenpublicationsindexhtml

II Selected Additional Readings

Ad hoc committee on copyright law revision (1976) Agreement on guidelines for classroom copying in not-for-profit educational institutions with respect to books and periodicals [classroom guidelines] Published in House Report 94-1476httpwwwuncedu~unclngclassroom-guidelineshtm

Aufderheide Patricia (1999) Communications policy and the public interest The Telecommunications Act of 1996 New York Guilford

Australian Attorney-General (1994) Stopping the rip-offs Intellectual property protection for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples httpwwwaggovauagdWWWrwpattachnsfviewasattachmentPersonal(CFD7369FCAE9B8F32F341DBE097801FF)~stopping+the+rip-offs-no+framepdf$filestopping+the+rip-offs-no+framepdf

Baystate v Bowers Discussion (2003) httpwwwutsystemeduogcintellectualpropertybaystatevbowersdiscussionhtm

Benkler Yochai (1999) Free as the air to common use First Amendment constraint on enclosure of the public domain New York Law Review 74(354-446) [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- httpwwwssrncomindex_sfhtml] httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=168609

Bettig Ronald V (1997) The enclosure of cyberspace Critical Studies in Mass Communication 14(2) 138-157

Blacks law dictionary (7th ed) (1999) St Paul MN Westhttpwwwpalkaufcomtoolsblacks_law_dictionaryhtm

Boisseau DL (1993) Anatomy of a small step forward The electronic reserve book room at San Diego State University Journal of Academic Librarianship 18(6) 366-368

Bowrey Kathy amp Rimmer Matthew (2002) Rip mix burn The politics of peer to peer and copyright law First Monday 7(8) httpwwwfirstmondayorgissuesissue7_8bowreyindexhtml

Boyle James (2003) Collected papers Duke conference on the public domain Durham NC Center for the Public Domain [This monograph also appeared as a special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1-2) 1-483]

Branscomb Anne Wells (1994) Who owns information From privacy to public access New York BasicBooks

Braunstein Yale M (1981) The functioning of information markets In Jane H Yurow and Helen A Shaw (Eds) Issues in information policy (pp 57-74) Washington DC National Telecommunications and Information Administration Department of Commerce

Brush Stephen B (1993) Indigenous knowledge of biological resources and intellectual property rights The role of anthropology American Anthropologist 95(3) pp 653-686

Caslon Analytics (2004) Intellectual property guide httpwwwcasloncomauipguidehtm Clifford Ralph D (2003) Amicus brief supporting Satava httpwwwsnesleducliffordsatavabriefpdf

Ciffolilli Andrea (2004) The economics of open source hijacking and the declining quality of digital information resources A case for copyright First Monday 9(9) httpwwwfirstmondayorgissuesissue9_9ciffolilliindexhtml

Colwin Jane (2002) Getting started Legal and ethical resources In Tomas Lipinski (Ed) Libraries museums and archives Legal Issues and ethical challenges in the new information era (pp 295-302) Lanham MD Scarecrow Press

Copyright Clearance Center (2005) httpwwwcopyrightcom

Crews Kenneth D (1993) Copyright fair use and the challenge for universities Promoting the progress of higher education Chicago University of Chicago Press

Crews Kenneth D (1995) Copyright law and information policy planning Public rights of use in the 1990s and beyond Journal of Government Information 22(2) 87-99

Crews Kenneth D (2000) Copyright essentials for librarians and educators Chicago American Library Association

Crews Kenneth D (2001) The law of fair use and the illusion of fair-use guidelines Ohio State Law Journal 62(2) 599-702

Dervin Brenda (1994) Information lt---gt democracy An examination of underlying assumptions In Leah A Lievrouw (Ed) Information resources and democracy [Special issue] (pp 369-385) Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(6)

Douzinas Costas amp Nead Lynda (Eds) (1999) Law and the image The authority of art and the aesthetics of law Chicago University of Chicago

Ferullo Donna L (2002 summer) The challenge of e-reserves Net connect 33-35

Fisher William W II (2004) Promises to keep Technology law and the future of

entertainment Stanford CA Stanford University

GartnerG2 amp the Center for Internet amp Society at Harvard Law School (2003) Copyright and digital media in a post-Napster world Publication No 2003-05 httpcyberlawharvardeduhome2003-05

Gasaway Laura N (1995) White Paper ndash A mixed bag Tech Trends 40(6) 6-8

Gasaway Laura N (2000) Values conflict in the digital environment Librarians versus copyright holders httpwwwuncedu~unclngColumbia-article3htm

Gasaway Laura N amp Wiant Sarah K (1994) Copyright A guide to copyright law in the 1990s Washington DC Special Libraries Association

Ginsburg Jane C (1993) Copyright without walls Speculations on literary property in the library of the future In R Howard Bloch amp Carla Hesse (Eds) Future libraries (pp 53-73) Berkeley CA University of California Press

Glendon Mary Ann (1991) Rights talk The impoverishment of political discourse New York The Free Press

Greenwich Workshop Inc v Tinker Creations Inc 932 F Supp 1210 C D Cal 1996 httpwwwutsystemeduogcintellectualpropertygreenwichvtimberhtm

Harper Georgia (2001) Copyright in the library Licensing httpwwwutsystemeduogcintellectualpropertylicrsrcshtm

Hawke Constance S (2001) Computer and Internet use on campus A legal guide to issues of intellectual property free speech and privacy San Francisco Jossey-Bass

Henderson Carol C (1998) Libraries as creatures of copyright Why librarians care about intellectual property law and policy Available at httpwwwalaorgContentNavigationMenuOur_AssociationOfficesALA_WashingtonIssues2Copyright1Copyrighthtm

Hoffman Gretchen McCord (2002a) What every librarian should know about copyright Part I The basics Texas Library Journal 78(2) 56-63

Hoffman Gretchen McCord (2002b) What every librarian should know about copyright Part II Copyright in cyberspace Texas Library Journal 78(3) 15-18

Hoffman Gretchen McCord (2002c) What every librarian should know about copyright Part III Frequently asked questions Texas Library Journal 78(4) 148-151

Hoffman Gretchen McCord (2003) What every librarian should know about copyright Part IV Writing a copyright policy Texas Library Journal 79(1) 12-15

Hollingsworth Dana (2001) General procedures contract checklist httpwwwutsystemeduogcsmallcontractssccklisthtml

Intellectual Reserve Inc v Utah Lighthouse Ministry Inc 75 F Supp 2d 1290 (D Ut Central Division 1999) httpwwwlawuhedufacultycjoycecopyrightrelease10IntReshtml

Jaszi Peter (1991) Toward a theory of copyright The metamorphoses of ldquoauthorshiprdquo Duke Law Journal 1991 455-502 httpheinonlineorgHOLPagehandle=heinjournalsduklr1991ampsize=2amprot=0ampcollection=journalsampid=463

Jaszi Peter (1994) On the author effect Contemporary copyright and collective creativity In Martha Woodmansee amp Peter Jaszi (Eds) The construction of authorship Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp 29-56) Durham NC Duke University

Jaszi Peter amp Woodmansee Martha (1994) Introduction In Martha Woodmansee amp Peter Jaszi (Eds) The construction of authorship Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp 1-13) Durham NC Duke University

Kimber Karen (2003) Introduction to legal research httpwwwlibrarieswrighteduservicesresearchguideslaw

Landow George P (1992) Access to the text and the authors right (copyright) In Hypertext The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology (pp 196-201) Baltimore MD Johns Hopkins University Press

Lange David (1981) Recognizing the public domain Law amp Contemporary Problems 44(4) 147-181 httpwwwheinonlineorgHOLPagehandle=heinjournalslcp44ampsize=2amprot=0ampcollection=lcpcfampid=813

Lange David (2003) Reimagining the public domain In James Boyle (Ed) Collected papers Duke conference on the public domain (pp 463-483) Durham NC Center for the Public Domain [This monograph also appeared as a special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1-2) 1-483]

Lange David amp Anderson Jennifer (2004) Reading the public domain Stanford CA Stanford University

Lee v ART Co 125 F 3d 580 CA 7 (Ill) 1997 httpwwwlawcornelleducopyrightcases125_F3d_580htm

Lievrouw Leah A (Ed) (1994a) Information resources and democracy [Special issue] Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(6)

Lievrouw Leah A (1994b) Information resources and democracy Understanding the paradox In Leah A Lievrouw (Ed) Information resources and democracy [Special issue] (pp 350-357) Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(6)

Lipinski Tomas A (1998) Information ownership and control In Martha E Williams (Ed) Annual review of information science and technology (Vol 33 pp 3-38) Medford NJ Information Today

Lipinski Tomas A (2002a) Librarians guide to copyright for shared and networked resources [Special issue] Library Technology Reports 38(1) 7-111

Lipinski Tomas A (Ed) (2002b) Libraries museums and archives Legal Issues and ethical challenges in the new information era Lanham MD Scarecrow Press

Litman Jessica (1990) The public domain Emory Law Journal 39(4) 965-1023 httpheinonlineorgHOLPagehandle=heinjournalsemlj39ampsize=2amprot=0ampcollection=journalsampid=979

Litman Jessica (1992) Copyright and information policy Law and Contemporary Problems 55(2) 185-209 httpwwwjstororgview00239186ap04022104a001100frame=noframeampuserID=8053f82butexasedu01cce44037005015df025ampdpi=3ampconfig=jstor

Litman Jessica (2000a) The demonization of piracy Presented at the Tenth Conference on Computers Freedom amp Privacy Toronto httpwwwlawwayneedulitmanpapersdemonpdf

Litman Jessica (2000b) Information privacyinformation property Stanford Law Review 52 1283-1313 httpwwwlawwayneedulitmanpapersinfoprivacypdf

Loring Christopher B (2000) Reserve technology and copyright In Allen Kent (Ed) Encyclopedia of library and information science (Vol 66 Supp 29 pp 281-299) New York Marcel Dekker

Madison James (1961) Federalist paper 43 In Clinton Rossiter (Ed) The federalist papers Alexander Hamilton James Madison John Jay (pp 271-280) New York Penguin

Martin Peter W (2003) Introduction to basic legal citation httpwwwlawcornelleducitationindexhtm

McGowan (2004) Copyright nonconsequentialism Missouri Law review 69(1) 1-71

McLeod Kembrew (2001) Owning culture Authorship ownership and intellectual property law New York Peter Lang

Miller Steven (1995) Civilizing cyberspace Policy power and the information superhighway New York ACM Press

Minow Mary amp Lipinski Tomas A (2003) The libraryrsquos legal answer book (pp 13-84) Chicago American Library Association

Mohr Kevin E (2002) How to brief a case httpwwwlibjjaycunyeduresearchbriefhtmlhttpwwwwsulawedupdfK1_F2003_How-To-Brief-A-Case_MOHRpdf

Molina J Carlos Fernaacutendez-Molina (2003) Laws against the circumvention of copyright technological protection Journal of Documentation 59(1) 41-68

Mosco Vincent (1996) The political economy of communication Thousand Oaks CA Sage

Mosco Vincent amp Wasko Janet (Eds) (1988) The political economy of information Madison WI University of Wisconsin Press

Murray Laura J (2004) Protecting ourselves to death Canada copyright and the Internet First Monday 9(10) httpwwwfirstmondayorgissuesissue9_10murray

National Research Council Committee for a Study on Promoting Access to Scientific and Technical Data for the Public Interest (1999) A question of balance Private rights and the public interest in scientific and technical databases Washington DC National Academy Press

National Research Council Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Emerging Information Infrastructure (2000) The digital dilemma Intellectual property in the information age Washington DC National Academy Press Also available at httpwwwnapeduhtmldigital_dilemma

Negativland [Colin Berry] (1995) Fair use The story of the letter u and the numeral 2 httpwwwwiredcomwiredarchive301negativland_prhtml

Negativland (2004a) httpwwwnegativlandcom

Negativland (2004b) Intellectual property issues httpwwwnegativlandcomintprophtml

Netanel Neil W (1996) Copyright and democratic civil society Yale Law Journal 106(2) 283-387

New York Times et al v Tasini et al No 00-201 (2001a) [majority opinion]httpsupctlawcornelledusupcthtml00-201ZShtml

New York Times et al v Tasini et al No 00-201 (2001b) [dissent] httpsupctlawcornelledusupctpdf00-201PZD

Nimmer Raymond T amp Krauthaus Patricia Ann (1992) Information as a commodity New imperatives of commercial law Law and Contemporary Problems 55(3) 103-130 httpwwwheinonlineorgHOLPagehandle=heinjournalslcp55ampid=821ampcollection=lcpcf

Ostrom Elinor (1990) Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective action Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press

Overman E Sam amp Cahill Anthony G (1990) Information policy A study of values in the policy process Policy Studies Review 9(4) 803-818

Patterson Lyman Ray (1968) Copyright in historical perspective Nashville TN Vanderbilt University

Patterson Lyman Ray amp Lindberg Stanley W (1991) The nature of copyright A law of users rights Athens GA University of Georgia Press

Radin Margaret (1993) Reinterpreting property Chicago University of Chicago Press

Raymond Eric S (1999) The cathedral amp the bazaar Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary Sebastopol CA OrsquoReilly

Recording Industry Association of America v Verizon Internet Services (2003) wwwefforglegalcases RIAA_v_Verizonopinion-20031219pdf

Reichman JH amp Franklin Jonathan A (1999) Privately legislated intellectual property rights Reconciling freedom of contract with public good uses of information University of Pennsylvania Law Review 147(4) 875-970 httpweblinks2epnetcomcitationasptb=1amp_ua=bt+ID++UPL+shn+1+db+aphjnh+bo+B5F+5D2Camp_ug=sid+C02AA8662D6FD72D43902D869D2DDE452EEAE00F40sessionmgr2+dbs+aph+8263amp_us=dstb+ES+ri+KAAACB1D00194252+fcl+Aut+sm+ES+sl+2D1+or+Date+B485amp_uh=btn+N+6C9Camp_uso=st5B0+2DJN++22University++of++Pennsylvania++Law++Review22++and++DT++19990401+tg5B0+2D+db5B0+2Daph+op5B0+2D+hd+False+63A9ampcf=1ampfn=1amprn=2amp

Reichman JH amp Uhlir Paul F (1999) Database protection at the crossroads Recent developments and their impact on science and technology Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14(2) 799-821

Richards Donald G (2002) The ideology of intellectual property rights in the international economy Review of Social Economy LX(4) 521-541

Rose Mark (1993) Authors and owners The invention of copyright Cambridge MA Harvard University

Samuelson Pamela (1996 January) The copyright grab Wired 4(1) 135-138

Samuelson Pamela (2003) Mapping the public domain Threats and opportunities In James Boyle (Ed) Collected papers Duke conference on the public domain (pp 147-171) Durham NC Center for the Public Domain [This monograph also appeared as a special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1-2) 1-483]

Samuelson Pamela (2004) Intellectual property arbitrage How foreign rules can affect domestic protections Chicago Law Review 71 223

Schmidt C James (1989) Rights for users of information Conflicts and balances among privacy professional ethics law national security In Filomena Simora (Ed) The Bowker annual Library and book trade almanac (pp 83-90) New Providence NJ RR Bowker

Slack Jennifer Daryl amp Fejes Fred (Eds) (1987) Ideology of the information age Norwood NJ Ablex

Tannen Deborah (1998) The argument culture Moving from debate to dialogue New York Random House

Twentieth Century Music Corp v Aiken 422 US 151 156 (1975)

United States v Paramount Pictures Inc 334 US 131 158 (1948)

US Congress (1976) Agreement on guidelines for classroom copying in not-for-profit educational institutions Agreed to by the Ad Hoc Committee on Copyright Law Revision the Author-Publisher Group and Authors League of America and the Association of American Publishers Inc httpwwwmusiclibraryassocorgCopyrightguidebkshtm

US Congress Congressional Research Service (2001) Federal statutes What they are and where to find them httpwwwcnieorgnlecrsreportsinformationinfo-16pdf

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1986b) Intellectual property rights in an age of electronics and information Washington DC Government Printing Office httpwwwwwsPrincetonEDU~otans20alpha_fhtml

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1989) Copyright amp home copying Technology challenges the law Washington DC Government Printing Office

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1990a) Critical connections Communication for the future Washington DC Government Printing Office

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1990b) Helping America compete The role of federal scientific and technical information Washington DC Government Printing Office

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1993) Making government work Electronic delivery of federal services Washington DC Government Printing Office

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1994) Electronic enterprises Looking to the future Washington DC Government Printing Office

US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1994) Information security and privacy in network environments Washington DC Government Printing Office

US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1993) The National Information Infrastructure Agenda for action Washington DC GPO

US General Accounting Office [Government Accountability Office as of 2004] (1994) Information superhighway Issues affecting development Washington DC Government Printing Office

Walterscheid Edward C (1994) To promote the progress of science and useful arts The background and origin of the intellectual property clause of the United States Constitution Journal of Intellectual Property Law 2(1) httpwwwlawschugaedu~jiplvol2walterschtml

Warwick Shelly (2002) Copyright for libraries museums and archives The basics and beyond In Tomas Lipinski (Ed) Libraries museums and archives Legal Issues and ethical challenges in the new information era (pp 235-255) Lanham MD Scarecrow Press

Weber Claire (2002) Designing drafting and implementing new policies In Tomas Lipinski (Ed) Libraries museums and archives Legal Issues and ethical

challenges in the new information era (pp 303-319) Lanham MD Scarecrow Press

Woodmansee Martha (1984) The genius and the copyright Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the ldquoauthorrdquo Eighteenth-Century Studies 17(4) 425-448

Selected law reviews and journals of special interest to copyright

Berkeley Technology Law Journal httpwwwlawberkeleyedujournalsbtlj

Cardozo Arts amp Entertainment Law Journal httpwwwcardozoyueduaelj

Duke Law amp Technology Review httpwwwlawdukeedujournalsdltr

Harvard Journal of Law amp Technology httpjoltlawharvardedu

Intellectual Property Law Review httpweblexis-nexiscomuniverseformacademics_lawrevhtml_m=0cd7a31f47f9114a4483775c1cafe6e4ampwchp=dGLbVtz-zSkVbamp_md5=592d0d3acbc667e6898e441696cad113[a more general source]

Journal of Intellectual Property Law httpwwwlawugaedujipl

Journal of the Copyright Society httpwwwcsusaorghtmlpublicationsjournaljournalhtm

Law and Contemporary Problems httpwwwlawdukeedujournalslcp

Richmond Journal of Law amp Technology httplawrichmondedujoltindexasp

Stanford Technology Law Review httpstlrstanfordeduSTLRCore_Pageindexhtm

Governmental and Commercial Serial Sources of Government Information

Code of Federal Regulations

Congressional Digest

Congressional Information Service

Congressional Quarterly

Congressional Record

C[ongressional] Q[uarterly] Weekly Reports

Federal Register

Supreme Court Reporter

US Code

US Code and Congressional and Administrative News

US Code Annotated

United States Supreme Court Reports

Journals and Other Serial Sources on Information Policy and Government Information

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Atlantic Monthly

The Bowker Annual Library and Book Trade Almanac

Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science

Communications Yearbook

Electronic Public Information Newsletter

EPIC [Electronic Privacy Information Center] Alert

EDUCAUSE Review

Federal Computer Week

Government Computer News

Government Information Quarterly

Government Technology

Harpers

Information Communication and Society

Information Management Review

Information Processing and Management

The Information Society

Internet Research Electronic Networks Applications and Policy (formerly Electronic Networking Research Applications and Policy)

Internet World

Journal of Academic Librarianship (especially its Information Policy column)

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (formerly the Journal of the American Society for Information Science)

Journal of Communication

Journal of Government Information An International Review of Policy Issues and Resources (formerly Government Publications Review)

Journal of Information Science

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Journal of Policy Research

The Journal of Politics

Knowledge

Knowledge in Society

Minerva A Review of Science Learning and Policy

Philosophy and Public Affairs

Policy Sciences

Policy Studies Journal

Policy Studies Review

Privacy Journal

Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting

Public Administration Review

Public Affairs Information Service

Research Policy

Sage Yearbook of Politics and Public Policy

Science

Scientific American

Science and Public Policy

Serials Review

Technology Review

Telecommunications Policy

Utne Reader

Newspapers

Los Angeles Times httpwwwlatimescom

New York Times httpwwwnytimescom

Wall Street Journal httpwwwwsjcom

Washington Post httpwwwwashingtonpostcom

Other online sources

(Barry Kitersquos) Aberrant Art httpwwwaberrantartcom

American Society of Composers Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) httpwwwascapcomindexhtml

Legislation httpwwwascapcomlegislation

Association of American Publishers (AAP) httpwwwpublishersorgGovernment Affairs httpwwwpublishersorggovtindexcfm

(University of California) Berkeley Center for Law amp Technology httpwwwlawberkeleyedu80institutesbclt

Chilling Effects httpwwwchillingeffectsorg

Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) httpwwwcniorg

(United States) Code httpwwwlawcornelleduuscode

(Compiler Pressrsquo) Compleat World copyright Website [sic] httpwwwcompilerpressatfreewebcomjournalhtm

Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) httpwwwcpsrorgdoxhomehtml

(US) Congressional Research Service (CRS) httpwwwcnieorgnlecrs_mainhtml

Copyright and Fair Use (Stanford U) httpfairusestanfordedu

Copyright Clearance Center httpwwwcopyrightcom

Copyright Crash Course (Georgia Harpers home page on copyright and other ldquoIPrdquo topics) httpwwwutsystemeduogcintellectualpropertygkhbio2htm

Copyright Management Center httpwwwiupuiedu~copyinfo

(US Library of Congress) Copyright Office httplcweblocgovcopyright

Copyright Society of the USA httpwwwcsusaorg

Cornell University Computer Policy amp Law Program httpwwwcornelleduCPL

Corporation for National Research Initiatives (CNRI) httpwwwcnrirestonvaus

(US) Department of Commerce (DoC) httpwwwdocgov

(US) Department of Justice (DoJ) httpwwwusdojgov

Digital Future Coalition httpwwwdfcorg

EDUCAUSE (formerly EDUCOM and CAUSE) httpwwweducauseedu

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) httpwwwefforg

Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) httpwwwepicorg

(Terry Carrollrsquos 2002) FAQs about Copyright httpwwwtjccomcopyrightFAQ

(US) Federal Communication Commission (FCC) httpwwwfccgov

(US) Federal Register httpwwwaccessgpogovsu_docsacesaces140html

Findlaw httplawcrawlerfindlawcom

First Monday httpwwwfirstmondayorg

(US) General Accounting Office (GAO) httpwwwgaogov

(Harvard University) Information Infrastructure Project httpksgwwwharvardeduiip

Illinois Institute of Technology Institute for Science Law and Technology httpwwwkentlaweduislt

Information Infrastructure Task Force (IITF) httpiitfdocgov

ldquoIntellectual propertyrdquo httpinfengpiracoukIEtop007htmhttpwwwipmagcomarchivehtml

Institute for Technology Assessment (ITA) httpwwwmtppiorgitaindexhtm

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) httpietfcnrirestonvaus

Internet Society httpinfoisocorg

(Cornell University Law School) Legal Information Institute httpwwwlawcornelledu

Copyright law httpfattylawcornelledutopicscopyrighthtml

LexisNexis Academic Search Form (Guided [advanced] Search) httpweblexis-nexiscomuniverseformacademics_lawrev_morehtml_m=6e07cc386066f3f56cade6326e14af9campwchp=dGLbVlz-zSkVAamp_md5=bc11b79f6023e54a9faa1849a8b3a3e7

Library of Congress Marvel (Machine-Assisted Realization of the Virtual Electronic Library) httplcweblocgovhomepagelchphtml

US Congress Thomas system for full text of selected bills httpthomaslocgov

Library of Congress LOCIS (Library of Congress Information System) httpmoondogusaskcahytelnetus3us373html

National Academy of Sciences (NAS) httpwwwnasedu

National Academy Press (NAP) httpwwwnapedu

National Information Infrastructure Servers with comprehensive sources httpwwwcunyedulinksniihtml

(US) National Information Infrastructure Virtual Library httpniinistgov

National Science Foundation (NSF) httpwwwnsfgov

National Security Agency (NSA) httpwwwnsagov8080

National Technical Information Service (NTIS) FedWorld httpwwwfedworldgov

National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) httpwwwntiadocgov

(US) Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) httpwwwotanapedu -- see Institute for Technology Assessment -- and Princeton University archive of OTA reports httpwwwwwsprincetonedu~ota

Public Knowledge httpwwwpublicknowledgeorg

Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) httpwwwriaacomdefaultaspAnti-piracy httpwwwriaacomissuespiracydefaultasp

(Esther Dysonrsquos) Release 10 httpwwwedventurecom

Software amp Information Industry Association httpwwwsiianetSIIA Anti-Piracy Division httpwwwsiianetpiracy

Telecommunications and Information Policy Institute httpwwwutexaseduresearchtipi

(University of California) UCCopyright httpwwwuniversityofcaliforniaeducopyright

especially see Additional Resources httpwwwuniversityofcaliforniaeducopyrightresourceshtml

University of Texas Libraries httpwwwlibutexasedu

Government information httpwwwlibutexasedugovernmentMore Govrsquot Information httpwwwlibutexasedugovernmentushtmlInternational Govrsquot Information

httpwwwlibutexasedugovernmentworldhtmlTexas Government Information

httpwwwlibutexasedugovernmenttexashtml

(Laura ldquoLollyrdquo Gasaway) When US Works Pass into the Public Domain httpwwwuncedu7Eunclngpublic-dhtm

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) httpwwwwipoint

Copyright and Related Rights httpwwwwipointabout-ipencopyrighthtml

[full Web site] httpwwwwipointcopyrightenFAQs About Copyright

httpwwwwipointcopyrightenfaqindexhtmBerne Convention httpwwwwipointtreatiesenipberneindexhtmlWIPO Copyright Treaty

httpwwwwipointdocumentsendiplconfdistribtreaty01htmIntellectual Property Digital Library httpwwwwipointipdlen

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element

Examples of Evaluative Criteria

REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 3

Expectations of studentsrsquo performance 4

Standards for written work 5

Some editing conventions for studentsrsquo papers 9

Grading 10

Texts and other tools 11

List of assignments 12

Outline of course 13

Schedule 15

Assignments 19

Suggestions for writing policy analysis 22

References 25

INTRODUCTION

bull Your name

bull The date

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

INTRODUCTION

bull Your name

bull The date

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Your name

bull The date

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Your name

bull The date

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Your name

bull The date

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Your name

bull The date

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

CONTINUED

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Symbol Meaning

caps capitalize

dB database

j journal

PL plural

Q question

sp spelling

SING singular

w with

wc word choice

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

GRADING

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS

FEB 24MAR 31

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

OUTLINE OF COURSE

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Paper presentations

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

SCHEDULE

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Services (2003)

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Vicarious liability

Paper presentations

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

ASSIGNMENTS

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

bull Abstract

bull Introduction

bull Key issues

bull References

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Define the problem

Select the criteria

Decide

Tell your story

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Executive summary

the dilemma

Issue statement

Policy alternatives

outcomes

References

Appendices

described

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

REFERENCES

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Federal Register

US Code

US Code Annotated

Atlantic Monthly

EDUCAUSE Review

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Harpers

Internet World

Knowledge

Policy Sciences

Privacy Journal

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Research Policy

Science

Scientific American

Serials Review

Technology Review

Utne Reader

Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

INF 390N2

Symbol Meaning

GRADING


LIST OF ASSIGNMENTS


OUTLINE OF COURSE


Schedule


Assignments





Element


REFERENCES






Federal Register


US Code Annotated



Newspapers

Documents

COPYRIGHT AND INFORMATION: LEGAL AND …i390n2pd/sp2005/Copyright... · Web viewCOPYRIGHT: LEGAL AND CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES* INF 390N.2 Unique Number 24995 Dr. Philip Doty School of