26
corey templeton | architectural portfolio

Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Architecture Portfolio 2009-2012 M.Arch, University of Oregon

Citation preview

Page 1: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

corey templeton | architectural portfolio

Page 2: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

R. Corey TempletonM.Arch | University of Oregon 2012

[email protected]

Architecture has long been my passion, though it was not until a fortuitous opportunity that

I was able to exit my career in Information Technology to pursue design. My background in

troubleshooting and customer service, as well as my B.S. in Business Administration should

serve my future employer well. My drive to succeed can be seen in how much I have

accomplished in architecture school with two young children and an amazingly patient wife.

This portfolio is a look back at my work in the Masters of Architecture program at the

University of Oregon. I tried to pare down each project as to not overwhelm with information,

but still communicate my strengths, and get a glimpse into some of the skills I have acquired

through the process.COREYabout

Page 3: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

>SCHOOL [the water and the woods]HEARTFLOWPARAMETRIC cortenSalem POLICE stationa nice [back alley] HOMENewport SEAFARER’S institute3 SANCTUARIES private residenceSTRUCTURAL modelingENCLOSURE detailing

010709111315171921CONTENTS

TABLE OF

Page 4: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK WATER // Situated between the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers, and with

70% low-grade wetland on the chosen site, water is a significant part of

Springfield citizens’ everyday lives. Surface rainwater runs through educa-

tional and functional bio-swales to rehabilitated wetlands at the lowest 15%

of the site approaching the main entry.

WOOD // With Springfield’s long history in the lumber industry, and the

site’s adjacent Weyerhaeuser lumber haul-road, local red-pine becomes a

prime material for the character of the school on the edge of town. The east

half of the site is enlivened with both deciduous and coniferous trees to

create a sense of enclosure.

SITE // Accommodating approximately 600 students from Kindergarten

through the 8th grade, this is a model of a school that serves the commu-

nity as well as the students. Sports fields reside at the flattest part of the site,

while the school sits at the southern edge, protecting the playground from

winter winds, as it addresses the residential neighborhood to the north.

WATER AND THE WOOD [LOCAL SIGNATURE]

SPRINGFIELD, OREGONFIGURE GROUND MAP

Sustainable Cities Initiative | K-8 School in Springfield, Oregon

Terminal Architecture Studio

GRADE DIVISION @ CENTRAL SOCIAL HUB

elementary

elementary

jr. high

kindergarten

CIRCULATION

athletics

fields

parking

playground

wetlandparking bus & parent

drop-offNATURAL SURVEILLANCESITE VIEWS

hillside

hillside

Mt. Pisgah valley

Page 5: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

site

plan

MAIN ENTRY

SPORTS FIELDS

PARKING LOT

BUS DROP-OFF

PARENT DROP-OFF

WETLAND

PLAYGROUND

BIO-SWALE

SERVICE ENTRY

FIRE LANE

E

SF

PL

BD

PD

W

PG

BS

SV

FL

SITE PLAN KEY:

SF

SF

W

PL

PL

SV

EBDPD

PG

BSFL

BS

BS

SF

QUARTZ AVENUE

NEW COLLECTOR ROAD

BOB STRAU

B PARKWAY

WEYERH

AEUSER PRIVATE H

AUL RO

AD>SCHOOL

The Water and The Woods

Term

inal

Stu

dio

Page 6: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK

A. AdministrationB. KindergartenC. Jr. High ClassroomsD. ArtE. Locker RoomsF. GymnasiumG. G. Auditorium / CafeteriaH. Music / PerformanceI. KitchenJ. Elementary School LibraryK. Elementary Shool ClassroomsL. RestroomsM. Jr. High Library / Technology

C

A

B

J

F

H

I

GE

DL

L

L

L

L L

K

ground oor @ 1”=32’

FIRST SKETCH : Mt. Pisgah and the valley provide long views to the southwest and the hillsides north and east remain accessible. This first response addresses the long and short views created by the site. A passage-way that can be opened up for non-school hours by clos-ing off the pair of wings bisected the school and effectively separated the Jr. High gym and larger publicly-used spaces. Water was also an early driving force, whether it be in the class or as an outdoor class-room experience. Elementary classrooms were set up in clusters, and circulation space was made into positive teaching environments.

Water running under the circulation space, and ending up in a rehabilitated wetland zone at the southwest corner of the site was a major design element early in the project. After the first sketch ideas, we changed scales to focus on creating a classroom and a classroom cluster. My intention was to look at the way classroom spaces were used, and to intuitively create zones for specific types of activities without inhibiting the openness of the room. Hallway zones provide additional instruction space for a series of classrooms, as built-in seating create opportunity for students to learn to socialize. Each classroom has an entrance zone with a tucked away cubby space for students personal items. A reading nook resides at a corner window as a separate zone, while the center of the class remains open for various configurations and teaching styles.

At this point, I was struggling with what that classroom shape was communicating, and what the rest of the school wanted to commu-nicate. It seemed as if the school had split personalities and didn’t fit with itself in its own skin.

It became increasingly apparent that the two classrooms wings weren’t speaking the same language. Without redesigning the most significantly designed classrooms, I opted to infuse the rotating, shift-ing language into the Jr. High classroom spaces. This allowed for a really nice natural surveillance of the space for the administration, as that circulation no longer turned as sharply.

I still found myself fighting against the slope of the site. The series of ramps not only made for an awkward constant climb inside, but also was cumbersome at best to connect each cluster of Elementary pods. These pods worked well on their own, but made connecting to a larger whole very difficult. Here, I needed to make the decision between a series of parts that worked fairly well on their own, but felt as if they were not the same project, or a project that felt cohesive and whole.

While the basic organization for the school stayed the same, a clean slate was a better solution than trying to polish what I had. I ran through numerous iterations of changes, before somewhat starting with a clean slate based upon the guiding principles I had been form-ing. Administration was still camped out at the head of a North/South circulation, but it was pushed back into the public space to provide an increased visibility to the other main entrances, and down a ma-jority of the circulation space. The Middle School is still separated to the southwest with views of Mt. Pisgah, and the Elementary wing still generally moves to the east, though the new arrangement has much less slope to climb, and is an overall stronger move.

Page 7: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

grou

nd fl

oor

1” =

64’

uppe

r flo

or1”

= 6

4’

AR

MU

AD

KG

JR EL

EL

AU

GM LR

LR

LI

SWRC

RC

RC

RC

RC

KT

E

SE

SE

SESE

SERR

RR

RD

LI

RRJR

JR

1300 sf

850 sf

999 sf

850 sf

Term

inal

Stu

dio

ADMINISTRATION

KINDERGARTEN

JR HIGH

ELEMENTARY

AUDITORIUM

GYMNASIUM

LOCKER ROOMS

LIBRARY

KITCHEN

RESTROOMS

MUSIC

ART

ROOF DECK

MAIN ENTRANCE

SECONDARY ENTRANCE

RAINWATER CATCHMENT

SWALE WINDOW

AD

KG

JR

EL

AU

GM

LR

LI

KT

RR

MU

AR

RD

E

SE

RC

SW

FLOOR PLAN KEY:

Page 8: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

ELEMENTARY CLASSROOM

CC

ST

BSBS

WZCC

SC

SC RN RN

SC

FW

CUBBIE AND COAT-RACK

FOLDABLE WHITE BOARD WALL

WET ZONE / SINK

COMPUTER SPACE

READING NOOK

STORAGE CABINET

SECONDARY TEACHING WALL

BENCH SEATING

CC

FW

WZ

CS

RN

SC

ST

BS

GRADES 1-5 KEY:

LONGITUDINAL SECTION A: 1” = 16’

Elementary classrooms overflow into the greater circulation to extend learning out onto space otherwise unused during class-time. The classrooms themselves are uniformly set up and mirrored with adjacent rooms with a back service wall and a main teaching wall. Walls between central classrooms are set up with sound-insulated folding white-board walls for increased activity between classrooms for new teaching styles. Zones are created for various uses without confining the use of the greater space, with corner cubbies and reading nook.

Natural surveillance finds itself as a key principle with teachers having direct supervision through seat to ceiling glazing, with a ‘floating’ secondary teaching wall. Color us used in such a manner that spills between classroom and circulation.

CC

WZ

CS

RNSC

ST BS

BSBS

FW

Page 9: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

MIDDLE SCHOOL CLASSROOM

grad

es 6

-81/

16”

=1’

LOCKERS FACING CIRCULATION

STORAGE CABINET

TEACHING WALL

FOLDABLE WHITE BOARD WALL

BENCH SEATING

GROUP SPACE

LO

SC

TW

FW

BS

GS

GRADES 6-8 KEY: Ground floor Jr. High space extends from classrooms

to group-work spaces equipped with white board

walls and built-in benches. Floor to ceiling glazing

promotes natural supervision both into and out of

classrooms. Walls between central classrooms can

be set up as sound-insulated folding white-board

walls for increased flexibility and activity between

classrooms. A low bench along the south wall gives

intentional placement to exterior vents and tromb

walls to receive warmth from the sun.

AUDITORIUM & MIDDLE SCHOOL

BS GS

SC

TW

BS

LONGITUDINAL SECTION A LONGITUDINAL SECTION A

A color palette of blues, blue-greens and light yellow was selected for the school. Blues are calming, and is conducive for thoughtful study, but also to alertness. Blues relax. A blue-green also comes out in the public space and Junior High. Greens suggest hope, restfulness and calm, and is associated with nature, giving a peaceful secure feeling. Yellows evoke feelings of warmth and cheerfulness. Local red-pine also gives warmth, with a local palette.

Term

inal

Stu

dio

Page 10: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK

Initially imagined as a large single building with interior connectivity, much like a physical heart, the project began as a literal translation of the shape of a heart. Because this introverted model did not respond to the site, other options were necessary.

Beginning to reach towards the edges of the site while creating a more private south facing court-yard, this concept became a bit

more inviting, while intentionally discreetly placing parking at the least public corner of the site for the privacy of its users.

Massing begin to house programmatic elements in this phase. Thrift store is located at the residential corner to the southwest, separated by the enclosed

children’s play-space pulled off the street. Day-use space now gets south-facing sunlight while medical and counseling face the bus stop and adjacent hospital.

The newly opened courtyard to the east allowed an element of permeability, where the shelter could be easily accessible for those coming in to help or be helped, while screened off to the common passerby. The flow of people starts to move like the lifeblood they truly are.

RECEIVE PEDESTRIANS from downtown and residential

CONCEPT DIAGRAM

CENTERED on building healthy RELATIONSHIPS

INFLOW of SERVICE

OPENNESS and flow of CIRCULATION

STRUGGLING FAMILIES come here for HELP

HUMAN SERVICES, MEDICAL CLINIC, COUNSELING, & THRIFT

Page 11: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

Stemming from the function of a heart, with life flowing both in and out of the vessel, this project took a good hard look at how individuals come to and use the facility. Site planning quickly became a primary focus of the project, to serve various needs. Inherent in the project is also the interstitial zone between privacy and interaction with the public.

Nine hundred homeless children in Eugene public schools is a number that speaks volumes for the need for helping families maintain a solid base for permanent housing. Transitional housing is patterned after apartment living, while the emergency shelter is just that. A family facility will help stop the spread of generational issues that lead to homelessness, from addictions, to job loss, to lack of education about spending money appropriately. This facility is positioned to get to the heart of why each family is struggling.

A thrift store facing the residential neighborhood serves the community and allows guests to shop with dignity for interview clothes and other necessities while the main entrance resides closest to downtown and catering to the bus station.

HEARTFLOW [Homeless Assistance Center in Eugene, OR]

13th & Olive Perspective

Site Plan Auditorium Section

Parking

Kitchen

Admin, Counseling & Medical

Transitional Housing Protected Courtyard

Protected Playground Auditorium / Classroom

Day Care

Thrift Store

Page 12: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK

Research focused on Parametrics using

Grasshopper, culminating in a series of

artistically perforated screens for my Homeless

Assistance Center project. Balancing daylight

and air-flow with the privacy of the clients was

integral for screening for the children’s outdoor

play space. While this project allowed me to

gain experience with Grasshopper, most of the

real rigor had to do with math and logic.

Perforation based on color brightness of a series of images

GRASSHOPPER ROUTINE

This web of processes is what

converts an image into a series

of circles, based on the value of

brightness on an X and Y grid.

Maximum perforations are set to

maintain the integrity of the corten

base. Upper and lower limits can

set perforation percentage.

Initial image Lightened image Inverse image

Parametric perforation

Page 13: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

In Oregon’s wet weather, it is important to provide covered walkways

between buildings. This expressive covering is formed with recycled steel

I-beams, and a pair of tension rods to stabilize the long cantilever. Pacific

Northwest lumber adorns the underside of the covering while a standing seam

roof sheds water into rain garden/bio swales to help manage water on the site.

As part of the Homeless Assistance project, corten screens are playfully perforated with images of families

and children playing, while providing privacy from the street for the day-care’s outdoor play area. Screens are

optimized for 10% perforation, permitting summer breezes and daylight to pass through the permeable membrane,

allowing children peer through to the outside world. Separated by the rain-garden from the colonnade, only

individuals very near the screen can recognize individuals beyond, allowing children to see, but not be seen.

PARAMETRIC corten

Shade, privacy & rain garden

Perforated Screen and Colonnade Perforation Example

Page 14: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK

Connection to outdoor spaces

civic center courtyard extendedtoward police station

plaza collecting late winter sun

north grove maintains reflection across Mirror Pond

bridge crossing for bikes and pedestrians [bring people to the site]

park at Mirror Pond remain intact along public trail

open to positive space from bridge underpass

south facing ‘front yard’ plaza allows gathering

Building mass orientationClimateSite Circulation

downtown, fire station, state capital, creek

university, hospital[research]

collect sun and people at south

wrapping back to relate to civic center

eco-district

large healthy must be preserved

large trees block late summer sun

summer breezes filtered through the site

splayed face open to warmth of

setting winter sun

council chamber removed for security, daylight and

shared courtyard

cold winter wind deflected by civic center & trees

building mass faces south & collects low winter sun, stored & released later

early summer sun blocked by mature trees

Police

FireDept.

Civic Center

The city of Salem’s police department currently resides on the ground

floor of the City Hall – a building not seismically fit for primary

responders. Therefore, we were asked to delve into how a new police

station could work on this site which houses the majority of the

Government buildings. I positioned the building to be the instrument that

steps down the full story height in slope to the existing Mirror Pond. This

solution responds to the existing Civic Center’s open court, and creates

a porous south facing courtyard up on the plinth. An existing grove of

trees to the west protects from the low summer sun. In order to minimize

the impact of a large singular new building, this layout creates a campus

feel, by separating the Council Chambers, Emergency Call Center, and

Cafe, while Police parking remains under the plinth for security.

Page 15: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

POLICEStation

Sale

m

New south-facing public plaza

Northeast approach beneath bridge

City government site layout

South facing across Mirror PondWest approach between Police and Call Center

Positive public space was absolutely

necessary with the retention of the

existing Mirror Pond, access to the

creek, and a public plaza on top of

an existing parking lot plinth with

the relocation of the city’s council

chambers.

Page 16: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK

timeh me

10th Street Alley at Adams

Co

rey T

em

ple

ton

• A

rch

itectu

re 5

84

S

um

mer

20

10

• P

rofe

sso

r Ji

m G

iven

s

Group site plan

Process sketches

Back yard

Adams Street section

16th inch model

Page 17: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

a nice [back alley]

HOME

Dining room and living space

Ground floor plan

Second floor plan

Foyer Master bedroom

The homes in this new alley neighborhood were designed by 5 designers

working together to create a cohesive whole. Lot A and D create a gateway to

the alley, making it necessary to create a presence on that corner. A split-level

approach was taken to separate the master bedroom to the second floor while

the second bedroom steps down half a floor to be flexible for various stages

of life with a separate entrance. The room is perfect for renting the room to

a college student, or giving it to the teenager or grandparent who needs their

privacy, but still has need to connect to the family.

The house’s minimalist approach holds lot of built-in features in order to make

it easy to furnish and live in. Complexity in form meets simplicity of living. A

seamless transition to the outdoor courtyard from the kitchen multiplies space.

Page 18: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK

daylighting section diagram

early section

view from parking above rendering

view from site : Newport Harbor

site model

chapel model

Conceptually the structure is divided into two pieces, both in plan and elevation and is wrapped

by a perpendicular major circulation pattern letting light into the core of the entire project. The

first two floors address Bay Blvd, and are publicly oriented with the cafe, pub, and game-room

to the east, and functions addressing the needs of the seamen to the west. The second floor also

holds a large multipurpose space with outdoor decks to the harbor. The latter two floors are up

the hill, with uninhibited views to both the dock and Newport’s famous bridge to the South.

The chapel is made as a special element, accessible via the third floor or the pedestrian easement

at the east side of the project, which itself takes advantage of multiple landings as spaces for

pedestrians to enjoy and access the building.

view from parking above model

Page 19: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

institute

Newport

site plan

second floor plan site section

perspective from fishermen’s dock

second floor plan

third floor plan

SEAFARERS

Page 20: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

PRO

CESS

WO

RK

daylighting section diagramsite photo in Eugene, OR

Page 21: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

[private residence in Eugene, OR]

ground floor plan

second floor plan

south facing section

tower floorplanswest facing tower sectionnorth facing tower section

west facing section

tower axonometric

3 SANCTUARIES

Page 22: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

Name:Connection A @ Center of Top Chord

GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011

srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 5 1.15 Two months

# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19

1.00 <=100

Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.33 Perpendicular to Grain Softwood

45,000 psi

05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows

Inches 2.000 in 0.50 2.000 1.000 1.500 1.2501.00 2.000 2.000 1.500 1.250

Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA

oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD

G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 55.73 deg NA

0.00 rad 0.97 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.53Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi

3,150 psi 87,000 psi

5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 4,243 6,491 32,456 lbs

1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 9,417 14,407 72,033 lbs

540,51900,3769,1II00.452.76 lbs

205,61003,3751,260.018.61 lbs

2,071 3,169 15,843 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,700 2,601 13,003 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46

1.15 k3 5.64300,31106,2ESLAF lbs

King Ying & Corey Templeton

Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM

CD

CM

Ct

Cg

CD

Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)

req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)

Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners

Min. End Dist. (CD)

Cd

Ceg

Cst

ϴ degrees ϴ degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn

Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd

tm ts Im

Em Es Is

Am in2 As in2

Am/As As/Am IIIm

IIIs

KD

Connection A Detail:A steel plate runs through the wooden member parallel to the steel rod. The fasteners run parallel to the rod as well, but the rows lie parallel to the beam.

2”

2” 3”

2”

2”

2”

market hall trussThe design purposes behind this truss revolve around lightness

of structure and interaction with daylight. A central skylight

runs the length of the building, reinforcing its axiality, letting

light strike the rich lumber hovering over the space to fill the

space with warm, reflected light. A steel rod runs through this

horizontal lumber to take tension loads, while allowing us

to express the visual characteristics of the wood. Steel rods

provide a feeling of lightness, while efficiently receiving loads.

Internal steel plates allow the wood to be seen with simplicity.

Name:Connection B @ Horizontal Member

GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011

srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 6 1.15 Two months

# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19

1.00 <=100

Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.00 Parallel Tension Softwood

45,000 psi

05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows

Inches 2.000 in 0.50 0.750 1.750 1.500 0.7501.00 0.750 3.500 2.000 0.750

Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA

oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD

G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 180 deg NA

0.00 rad 3.14 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.15Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi

3,150 psi 87,000 psi

5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 3,267 3,748 22,488 lbs

1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 7,250 8,318 49,910 lbs

524,01737,1415,1II00.452.76 lbs

434,11609,1166,160.018.61 lbs

1,595 1,830 10,977 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,309 1,502 9,009 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46

1.50 k3 5.64900,9205,1ESLAF lbs

King Ying & Corey Templeton

Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM

CD

CM

Ct

Cg

CD

Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)

req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)

Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners

Min. End Dist. (CD)

Cd

Ceg

Cst

ϴ

degrees

ϴ

degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn

Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd

tm ts Im

Em Es Is

Am in2 As in2

Am/As As/Am IIIm

IIIs

KD

Connection B Detail:A 1” steel rod runs through the center beam to handle tensile forces, while the wood is mostly for aesthetics. Bolts are centrally located where the rods meet.

11” 3”3”

3”3”3”

Name:Connection B @ Horizontal Member

GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011

srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 6 1.15 Two months

# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19

1.00 <=100

Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.00 Parallel Tension Softwood

45,000 psi

05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows

Inches 2.000 in 0.50 0.750 1.750 1.500 0.7501.00 0.750 3.500 2.000 0.750

Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA

oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD

G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 180 deg NA

0.00 rad 3.14 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.15Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi

3,150 psi 87,000 psi

5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 3,267 3,748 22,488 lbs

1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 7,250 8,318 49,910 lbs

524,01737,1415,1II00.452.76 lbs

434,11609,1166,160.018.61 lbs

1,595 1,830 10,977 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,309 1,502 9,009 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46

1.50 k3 5.64900,9205,1ESLAF lbs

King Ying & Corey Templeton

Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM

CD

CM

Ct

Cg

CD

Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)

req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)

Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners

Min. End Dist. (CD)

Cd

Ceg

Cst

ϴ

degrees

ϴ

degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn

Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd

tm ts Im

Em Es Is

Am in2 As in2

Am/As As/Am IIIm

IIIs

KD

Connection B Detail:A 1” steel rod runs through the center beam to handle tensile forces, while the wood is mostly for aesthetics. Bolts are centrally located where the rods meet.

11” 3”3”

3”3”3”

Name:Connection A @ Center of Top Chord

GTF/Section:Date: February 22, 2011

srotcaF tnemtsujdAnoitamrofnI noitcennoC# of Shear Planes 2# of Fasteners (N) 5 1.15 Two months

# of Fasteners in a Row 3 1.00 <=19 <=19

1.00 <=100

Dowel Information 1.002 /1 )D( retemaiD lewoD in 1.33 Perpendicular to Grain Softwood

45,000 psi

05.3ecnatsiD dnE lautcA inDiameters 4.0 D edge* end fasteners rows

Inches 2.000 in 0.50 2.000 1.000 1.500 1.2501.00 2.000 2.000 1.500 1.250

Member InformationMain Member Side Member NA

oN00.1leetS1 .oN ,hcraL - riF salguoD

G 0.5 G 7.85 NA0 deg 55.73 deg NA

0.00 rad 0.97 rad NAFe 4,650 psi Fe 87,000 psi 1.53Fe para 5,600 psi Fe para 87,000 psi

3,150 psi 87,000 psi

5,600 psi 87,000 psi Z Z' N*Z'7.00 in 0.50 in 4,243 6,491 32,456 lbs

1,700,000 psi 29,000,000 psi 9,417 14,407 72,033 lbs

540,51900,3769,1II00.452.76 lbs

205,61003,3751,260.018.61 lbs

2,071 3,169 15,843 lbsRe 0.06 k1 0.38 IV 1,700 2,601 13,003 lbsRt 14.00 k2 0.46

1.15 k3 5.64300,31106,2ESLAF lbs

King Ying & Corey Templeton

Sara Vernia : Tuesday @ 4PM

CD

CM

Ct

Cg

CD

Dowel Bending Yield Strength (Fyb)

req. distance (in) req. spacing (in)

Ctr to Ctr Spacing between Fasteners

Min. End Dist. (CD)

Cd

Ceg

Cst

ϴ degrees ϴ degrees Cdi*items in gray do not apply to bolted connectionsϴ radians ϴ radians Ctn

Fe perp Fe perp Yield Limit Eq.'sFem Fes Rd

tm ts Im

Em Es Is

Am in2 As in2

Am/As As/Am IIIm

IIIs

KD

Connection A Detail:A steel plate runs through the wooden member parallel to the steel rod. The fasteners run parallel to the rod as well, but the rows lie parallel to the beam.

2”

2” 3”

2”

2”

2”

Page 23: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

modelingSTRUCTURALKing Tang & Corey Templeton

Structures 562 : Market HallWinter 2011 : Du� & DonofrioGTF: Sara Vernia : Tues @ 4PM

Snow Load = .154 kips

FRAME

LOAD

DEFLECTION

Max De�ection = .205”

Dead Load = .08 kips (truss, purlins, decking, roo�ng)

1” Diameter Steel Rod

1” Diameter Steel Rodinside an 8’x10’ DF#1

8’x10’ DF#1

AB

C

D

E

King Tang & Corey TempletonStructures 562 : Market Hall

Winter 2011 : Du� & DonofrioGTF: Sara Vernia : Tues @ 4PM

MOMENT & AXIAL

SHEAR

Max Moment = 2.025 kip-ftMax Tension = 7.194 kips

Max Compression = 8.502 kips

Max Shear = 0.902 kips

A

B

C

D

E

2.025 kip-ft

Max Moment

-

-

-

-

8.502 kips

Max Compression

-

-

1.579 kips

-

0.194 kips

Max Tension

4.327 kips

2.488 kips

-

7.194 kips

0.902 kips

Max Shear

-

-

-

-

0.150 in

Max De�ection

0.194 in

0.032 in

0.216 in

0.173 in

Page 24: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

Project 2

Project 2window wall at floor 2window head at brick wall top of parapet

window sill at brick wall

Page 25: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

detailingENCLOSURE

Analysis Corey TempletonEnclosures: Fall 2011

GTF CarbonnierProject 2

Brick Wall Shading MaskThis shade chart shows that the horizontal external shade does little in blocking sun except for between 11am and Noon (seen in green). The fact that the window is recessed into the brick wall actually accounts for a fairly large chunk during the same time frame.

Glazing Wall Shading Mask:Being set back 10’ from the brick building, the vertical fin does not need to be as close to the building. However, in this analysis, I found that my drop-down shading device (seen here in green) did not actually help shade any sun that the fins were missing - but perhaps more glare.

Brick Wall Daylight Factor = 2.52.5 x VT .64 = 1.6

Glazing Wall Daylight Factor = 2.52.5 x .64 = 1.6

SOLARBAN 70XL GLAZING:LT 64%U-VALUE .27SHGC .27SHADING COEFFICIENT .32OUTDOOR VLR 12%

% of wall R-Value sectionparapet up to top of slab 10.379 9 120 1080 7.5 5.56 77.8425 0.1

stainless steel coping 0.0095/8” plywood sheathing 0.77

-9.6

louver section 3 17 120 2040 14.17 10.49 42.5 0.2inoperable louvers -insulated operable louvers (1/2” thick) 3

glazing 3.70 128 120 -530 14830 102.99 76.29 381.43 0.2mullion 0.40 8 120 530 1490 10.35 7.66 4.14 1.9

19440 135 100 2.4

GLAZED / OPAQUE AREA (GLAZED WALL) R-Value per sqftHeight

(inches)Width

(inches)

Additional Vertical

Mullion Area

Material Square Inches SqFt.

Weighted R-Value

sbpo water barrier4” metal stud w/ batt insulation

% of wall R-Value sectionparapet up to top of slab 23.33 9 120 1080 7.5 10.12 174.975 0.1

4” brick 0.82” air gap 1.823” rigid insulation 18

-5/8” plywood sheathing 0.774” metal stud cavity w/ NO insulation 1.94

louver section 3 17 120 2040 14.17 19.12 42.5 0.4inoperable louvers -insulated operable louvers (1/2” thick) 3

glazing 3.70 102 68 -544 6936 48.17 65.02 178.40 0.4mullion 0.40 102 6 544 612 4.25 5.74 1.70 3.4low brick wall under window 23.78 28 72 2016 14.00 18.90 332.92 0.1

4” deep brick 0.82” air gap 1.823” rigid insulation 18

-5/8” plywood sheathing 0.776” metal stud cavity with NO insulation 1.941/2” gypsum wallboard 0.45

brick wall @ sides of windows 23.78 136 64 8704 60.44 81.59 1437.37 0.14” deep brick 0.82” air gap 1.823” rigid insulation 18

-5/8” plywood sheathing 0.776” metal stud cavity with NO insulation 1.941/2” gypsum wallboard 0.45

10668 74.0833 100 4.2

GLAZED / OPAQUE AREA (BRICK WALL) R-Value per sqftHeight

(inches)Width

(inches)

Additional Vertical

Mullion Area

Material Square Inches SqFt.

Weighted R-Value

sbpo water barrier

sbpo water barrier

sbpo water barrier

cutaway axonometric of window wall and vertical sunshade7 window wall and vertical sunshade

Page 26: Corey Templeton Architecture Portfolio

COREY TEMPLETONM.Arch | U.Oregon [email protected]