8
Central Annals of Vascular Medicine & Research Cite this article: Gajjar T (2016) Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features, Morphologic Aspects, Diagnostic Criteria, Management Options, and Outcome. Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038. *Corresponding author Trushar Gajjar, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Prasanthigram–515134, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India, Tel: 9700355411; Email: Submitted: 16 August 2016 Accepted: 24 September 2016 Published: 19 October 2016 ISSN: 2378-9344 Copyright © 2016 Gajjar OPEN ACCESS Keywords • Coronary arteriovenous fistula; Ligation; Closure; Percutaneous closure; Arteriorraphy Research Article Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features, Morphologic Aspects, Diagnostic Criteria, Management Options, and Outcome Trushar Gajjar* Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, India Abstract Objective: Coronary artery fistula is an unusual coronary anomaly. To thespectrum of coronary cameral communications, we want to add this separate entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management options, and outcome in various clinical settings forbetter understanding of this developmentally intriguing, clinically complex, and therapeutically challenging disorder. Methods: From June 1992 through June 2016, 16 patients were treated for coronary cameral fistula at our institution. Ages ranged from 1 to 53 years. There were 8 male subjects and 8 female subjects. Morphologically, isolated fistulas arise from both the right and left coronary arteries, probably with similar frequency, but terminate much more commonly in the right heart or pulmonary artery than in the left heart. But in our series 76.4%(n=13) of the fistula originated from the left coronary artery and 23.6% (n=4) from the right coronary artery. The termination or drainage to the right ventricle in 47% (n=8), to the right atrium in 29.4% (n=5), to the coronary sinus and left atrium in 5.9% each (n=1 each) and to the pulmonary artery in 11.6% (n=2); In all patients the diagnosis was established by means of 2-dimensional echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography and confirmed by means of angiography and contrast enhanced tomography scan. Fifteen patients were treated surgically, and1 patient was treated with coil embolization. Postoperative echocardiograms obtained for all patients before discharge confirmed complete obliteration of the tunnel. Results: There was no early or late mortality. All patients were discharged in stable condition. During follow-up at 3 months, 1year, 5years, 10 years and more than 10 years, all patients were in New York Heart Association class I, and echocardiography showed no residual shunts. Conclusions: Coronary cameral fistula is a rare congenital anomaly. It can be seen isolated or in association with other cardiac defects. It may arise from one coronary system or involve both coronary systems. Fistulas draining into the coronary sinus are prone to develop congestive cardiac failure. Fistulas draining in Right atrium or coronary sinus are prone to develop atrial fibrillation& its sequel. Cardiac cath and coronary angiography gives definitive diagnosis and planning management and to rule out other cardiac lesions. Computed tomography angio may replace angiography in the future for noninvasive diagnosis. Surgery is indicated for lesions not amenable to percutaneous closure. Surgical closure can be done with or without cardio pulmonary bypass by ligation, tangential arteriorraphy or closure via cardiac chamber. Most of the fistula can be dealt with in the interventional catheterization laboratory. However, occasionally large fistulas have a difficult origin and may present particular challenges to the interventional catheterization team so that they require surgical management.The location and the size of the fistula dictates technical details. Follow-up reveals excellent functional recovery. INTRODUCTION The prevalence of Coronary arteriovenous fistula (CAF) is about 0.1-0.8% based on coronary angiography or echocardiography studies. CAFs originate mostly from the right coronary artery and the left anterior descending artery and have proximal involvement. Most of them drain into the right atrium, right ventricle and pulmonary artery. Few of them drain into the left ventricle or left atrium. To the spectrum of coronary cameral communications, we want to add this separate entity of coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management options, and outcome in various clinical settings for better understanding of this developmentally intriguing, clinically complex, and therapeutically challenging disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective and prospective study of 16 patients with CAF who were treated between November1992 through July 2016, at our institution. Ages ranged from 1 to 53 years (mean, 19.3 years), with a male/female ratio of 8:8. All patients were symptomatic. Clinical presentation included one or more of the following complaints. All patients had shortness of breath, of whom 15 were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and 1 was in NYHA class IV. One patient presented with palpitation. Recurrent respiratory tract infection was present in 4 patients, and angina of NYHA class II was present in 1 patient. Physical

Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central Annals of Vascular Medicine & Research

Cite this article: Gajjar T (2016) Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features, Morphologic Aspects, Diagnostic Criteria, Management Options, and Outcome. Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038.

*Corresponding authorTrushar Gajjar, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Prasanthigram–515134, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India, Tel: 9700355411; Email:

Submitted: 16 August 2016

Accepted: 24 September 2016

Published: 19 October 2016

ISSN: 2378-9344

Copyright© 2016 Gajjar

OPEN ACCESS

Keywords•Coronaryarteriovenousfistula;Ligation;Closure;

Percutaneous closure; Arteriorraphy

Research Article

Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features, Morphologic Aspects, Diagnostic Criteria, Management Options, and OutcomeTrushar Gajjar* Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, India

Abstract

Objective: Coronary artery fistula is an unusual coronary anomaly. To thespectrum of coronary cameral communications, we want to add this separate entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management options, and outcome in various clinical settings forbetter understanding of this developmentally intriguing, clinically complex, and therapeutically challenging disorder.

Methods: From June 1992 through June 2016, 16 patients were treated for coronary cameral fistula at our institution. Ages ranged from 1 to 53 years. There were 8 male subjects and 8 female subjects. Morphologically, isolated fistulas arise from both the right and left coronary arteries, probably with similar frequency, but terminate much more commonly in the right heart or pulmonary artery than in the left heart. But in our series 76.4%(n=13) of the fistula originated from the left coronary artery and 23.6% (n=4) from the right coronary artery. The termination or drainage to the right ventricle in 47% (n=8), to the right atrium in 29.4% (n=5), to the coronary sinus and left atrium in 5.9% each (n=1 each) and to the pulmonary artery in 11.6% (n=2); In all patients the diagnosis was established by means of 2-dimensional echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography and confirmed by means of angiography and contrast enhanced tomography scan. Fifteen patients were treated surgically, and1 patient was treated with coil embolization. Postoperative echocardiograms obtained for all patients before discharge confirmed complete obliteration of the tunnel.

Results: There was no early or late mortality. All patients were discharged in stable condition. During follow-up at 3 months, 1year, 5years, 10 years and more than 10 years, all patients were in New York Heart Association class I, and echocardiography showed no residual shunts.

Conclusions: Coronary cameral fistula is a rare congenital anomaly. It can be seen isolated or in association with other cardiac defects. It may arise from one coronary system or involve both coronary systems. Fistulas draining into the coronary sinus are prone to develop congestive cardiac failure. Fistulas draining in Right atrium or coronary sinus are prone to develop atrial fibrillation& its sequel. Cardiac cath and coronary angiography gives definitive diagnosis and planning management and to rule out other cardiac lesions. Computed tomography angio may replace angiography in the future for noninvasive diagnosis. Surgery is indicated for lesions not amenable to percutaneous closure. Surgical closure can be done with or without cardio pulmonary bypass by ligation, tangential arteriorraphy or closure via cardiac chamber. Most of the fistula can be dealt with in the interventional catheterization laboratory. However, occasionally large fistulas have a difficult origin and may present particular challenges to the interventional catheterization team so that they require surgical management.The location and the size of the fistula dictates technical details. Follow-up reveals excellent functional recovery.

INTRODUCTIONThe prevalence of Coronary arteriovenous fistula

(CAF) is about 0.1-0.8% based on coronary angiography or echocardiography studies. CAFs originate mostly from the right coronary artery and the left anterior descending artery and have proximal involvement. Most of them drain into the right atrium, right ventricle and pulmonary artery. Few of them drain into the left ventricle or left atrium. To the spectrum of coronary cameral communications, we want to add this separate entity of coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management options, and outcome in various clinical settings for better understanding of this developmentally intriguing, clinically complex, and

therapeutically challenging disorder.

MATERIAL AND METHODSThis is a retrospective and prospective study of 16 patients

with CAF who were treated between November1992 through July 2016, at our institution. Ages ranged from 1 to 53 years (mean, 19.3 years), with a male/female ratio of 8:8. All patients were symptomatic. Clinical presentation included one or more of the following complaints. All patients had shortness of breath, of whom 15 were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and 1 was in NYHA class IV. One patient presented with palpitation. Recurrent respiratory tract infection was present in 4 patients, and angina of NYHA class II was present in 1 patient. Physical

Page 2: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central

Gajjar (2016)Email:

Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038 (2016) 2/8

examination revealed a continuous murmur at the right or left parasternal border in the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal spaces in all 16 patients. Initial chest radiography showed cardiomegaly in all patients, with cardio thoracic ratios ranging from 55% to 80% and increased pulmonary vascularity. Electrocardiography showed sinus rhythm, normal axis, and right ventricular hypertrophy, with strain pattern in 14 patients, two patients were in atrial fibrillation. Two dimensional (2D) echocardiography and Doppler scanning showed a dilated coronary with continuous Doppler signals in the draining chamber (Table 1, Figure 1). Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography were performed in all patients. Cardiac catheterization showed a step up in draining chamber ranging from 77% to 92.9% and left-to-right shunt ranging from 1.2:1 to 4.5:1 L/ min/ m2, with a normal pulmonary vascular resistance index ranging from 0.2 to 2.5 Wood units except in one patient with fistula to left atrium. Coronary angiography showed, single fistula in 15 patients and multiple fistula in 1 patient. Fistula was originating from the Left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in 5 patients, Left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) in 8 patients, and right coronary artery (RCA) in 4 patients. The site of termination of fistula was in right ventricle (RV) in 8 patients, right atrium (RA) in 5 patients, pulmonary artery (PA) in 2 patients and coronary

sinus (CS) and left atrium (LA) in 1 patient each (Figures 2,3). One patient underwent Computed tomography scan showed, left circumflex coronary fistula opening into the coronary sinus (Figure 4). Patient in NYHA IV required medical stabilization before surgery. Fifteen patients underwent surgical correction and one patient underwent coil embolisation. The surgical technique used was, off pump ligation in 5 (33.3%) patients (Figure 5), on pump closure in 10 (66.6%) patients. Off Pump – Terminal fistula without associated anomalies and On Pump – RA, RV Inflow, MPA & LA or associated anomalies. A detail of surgical procedure is listed in (Table 2). Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 86 minutes and mean aortic cross clamp time was 46 minutes. Associated procedures were performed like, Atrial septal defect closure in 2 patients, Tetrology of Fallot correction and open mitral commissurotomy in one patient each. One patient underwent coil embolisation, Using JL diagnostic catheter SOFT TERUMO 0.035” x 260 centimeter wire passed from LAD to fistula to RV to PA which was snared out from Right femoral vein approach and thus a-v rail created. Despite multiple attempts 5Fr. PDA sheath could not be tracked from RFV across the fistula due to very tortuous course and using mother & child approach finally 5Fr long PDA sheath tracked from arterial side into LAD into fistula 8Fr. vascular plug deployed from right femoral artery (RFA) to LAD to FISTULA and position confirmed with JL catheter injection in left system to confirm vascular plug position beyond distal LAD (Figure 6).

RESULTSThere was no immediate mortality or no myocardial

infarction or arrhythmias. Intra operative and immediate post-operative echocardiography showed, no residual or recurrent shunt in all (Figure 7), and good ventricular function in all except one who had biventricular dysfunction. Mean ventilation time was 7.5 hours and mean intensive care unit stay was 2.5 days. Follow up was done at 3 months, 1 year, 5, 10 and more than 10 years. Average follow up was 82.5% with average follow up duration was 114 months and all patients were in NYHA class I, one patient was developed left ventricular dysfunction at 3 years follow up, one patient with atrial fibrillation developed moderate tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular dysfunction at 5 years follow up. The longest follow up was 17 years and on follow up no residual or recurrence of fistula and coronary arteries remained dilated and tortuous with marginal reduction in the size. Only one patient underwent coil embolisation recently and 1st follow up showed no residual or recurrent fistula but dilated coronary artery. There was no late mortality.

DISCUSSIONCoronary artery fistula (CAF) is a unusual vascular anomaly

that communicates between one of the coronary arteries and a cardiac chamber or a large thoracic vessel. The first reported case of a CAF was in 1865 by Krause [1]. Its prevalence is about 0.1-0.8% based on coronary angiography and echocardiography studies [2-5]. The true incidence is difficult to evaluate because about half of the cases may be asymptomatic and clinically undetectable until an echocardiogram or catheterization is performed. CAFs comprise 14% of congenital coronary artery anomalies [4], and represent 0.4% of all congenital cardiac

Table 1: Echocardiographic data with origin of fistula, termination of fistula and their numbers.Coronary Artery Origin Termination of Fistula No of Patients

LCx RV 1LCx RA 4LCx CS 1LCx LA 1LCx PA 1LAD RV 4LAD PA 1RCA RV 3RCA RA 1

Abbreviations: LAD- Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery; LCX- Left Circumflex Coronary Artery; RCA- Right Coronary Artery; RA- Right Atrium; CS- Coronary Sinus; RV- Right Ventricle; PA-Pulmonary Artery; LA- Left Atrium.

Figure 1 Preoperative echocardiography shows, dilated coronary artery with continuous color flow.

Page 3: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central

Gajjar (2016)Email:

Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038 (2016) 3/8

Figure 2 Angiography.A. Left coronary angiography shows, LAD to PA fistula. LAD-Left anterior descending coronary artery, PA-Pulmonary artery.B. Aortic root angiogram shows, LAD to RV fistula.LAD-Left anterior descending coronary artery, RV- Right ventricle.C. Aortic root angiogram shows, RCA to RV fistula. RCA- Right coronary artery, RV- Right ventricle.

Figure 3 Aortic root Angiography.A. LCX to RA fistula.B. LCX to RV fistula.C. LCX to CS fistula.Abbreviations: LCX- Left Circumflex Coronary Artery; RV- Right Ventricle; CS- Coronary Sinus.

Figure 4 Computed coronary angiography showing LCX to CS fistula.A-F: Origin, course and termination of LCX-CS (* mark).Abbreviations: LCX- Left Circumflex Coronary Artery; CS- Coronary Sinus.

Page 4: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central

Gajjar (2016)Email:

Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038 (2016) 4/8

Figure 5 Intraoperative images.A-C- LAD to RV fistulaD-F- LCX to RV fistulaAbbreviations: ALAD- Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery; LCX- Left Circumflex Coronary Artery; RV- Right Ventricle.

Figure 6 Left coronary angiogram showing, LAD to RV fistula with vascular plug (Arrow).Abbreviations: LAD- Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery; RV- Right Ventricle.

Table 2: Operative techniques used for the patients.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE No. OF PATIENTS

Ligation 5 (31.25%)

Through cardiac chamber 6 (37.5%)

Through MPA 2 (12.5%)

Tangential arteriorrhaphy 1 (6.25%)

Combined ligation and through cardiac chamber 1 (6.25%)

Combined arteriorrhaphy and through cardiac chamber 1 (6.25%)

Abbreviations: MPA- Main Pulmonary Artery.

malformations [6]. Approximately 10-30% of patients with a CAF also have another congenital cardiovascular anomaly [7,8]. The most commonly seen defects include variations of tetralogy of Fallot, patent ductus arteriosus, atrialseptal defect, ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis. The majority of CAFs arise from the right coronary artery and the left anterior descending artery; the circumflex coronary artery is rarely involved. They most frequently drain into the right ventricle, right atrium or pulmonary artery. Few of them drain into the coronary sinus, left ventricle, left atrium, pulmonary vein or superior vena cava.

Generally, most CAFs manifest as a single fistula; cases of multiple fistulas are rare. CAFs can be found at any age and are not gender specific.

Pathophysiology

According to the site of drainage, CAFs have varied physiologic presentations. Latson et al., described the physiology of CAFs in detail [9]. CAFs that drain into the right side of the circulation create a left-to-right shunt of oxygenated blood back to the pulmonary circulation. Those that drain into the

Page 5: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central

Gajjar (2016)Email:

Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038 (2016) 5/8

systemic veins or right atrium have a circulatory physiology similar to an atrial septal defect. Those that drain into the right ventricle have a circulatory physiology similar to a ventricular septal defect. Those that drain into the pulmonary arteries are similar hemodynamically to a patent ductus arteriosus. Chronic volume overload of the right heart may lead to pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, there are no literature reports of Eisenmenger’s syndrome caused by untreated CAFs. A coronary fistula that drains into the left atrium does not result in a left-to-right shunt, but rather causes a volume load similar to mitral regurgitation. Furthermore, a coronary fistula that drains into the left ventricle produces hemodynamic changes similar to aortic insufficiency. Occasionally CAFs may exist along with an atherosclerotic stenosis of the same coronary artery. Both disorders can induce myocardial ischemia [10-12]. The location of the coronary fistula with respect tothe coronary stenosis may play a significant role inthe pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia [13]. In most published reports, the fistula is located proximal to the coronary stenosis. In other cases, the fistula is located distal to the stenosis and may associate with a right-to-left shunt if a significant drop occurs in the coronary arterial pressure distal to the coronary lesion. The mechanism involved in the pathophysiology of ischemia differs depending on the location of the fistula with respect to the stenotic lesion. In the first case, ischemia occurs because of the coronary steal phenomenon associated with decreased coronary flow through the stenosis. In the second situation, ischemia is induced because of a reduction in coronary flow through the stenosis and a right-to-left shunt that allows deoxygenated blood from the right sided circulation to enter the coronary artery.

Etiology and classification

In the past, CAFs are almost reported as congenital in origin. Congenital fistulous connections between the coronary system and a cardiac chamber appear to represent persistence of embryonic inter trabecular spaces and sinusoids [14-17]. Acquired CAFs have been reported with an increasing frequency in recent years. It is possible that this increase may be due to an incremental use of intravascular procedures and interventional techniques. Acquired CAFs have been reported

as acomplication of one the following conditions: deceleration accident, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, endomyocardial biopsy, implantation of permanent ventricular pacing leads, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, mitral valve replacement, septal myectomy or acute myocardial infarction [18-20]. Seventy-six patients (1985-1995) with 96 CAFs were identified from a review of the literature by Said et al., [18]. They reported a congenital origin in 64% of these 76 cases and an acquired cause in 36%. Latson et al. [9], proposed a way to classify the size of CAFs. They consider that trivial or small fistulas result in little or no dilation of the proximal coronary artery from which they arise, and are themselves no larger at any point than twice the normal expected proximal coronary artery diameter. Fistulas that, at any point, are larger than two times but less than three times the expected proximal normal coronary artery diameter, or that are associated with a similar range of dilation of the proximal associated coronary artery, are considered to be medium-size fistulas. Fistulas that are more than three times the proximal coronary artery diameter are considered large. This classification may be useful in making clinical decisions.

Clinical manifestation

Most CAFs are found incidentally during cardiac catheterization. The clinical manifestations vary according to the size of the fistula, drainage site and patient’s age. About half of them are symptomatic, but angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia, endocarditic and aneurysm rupture have been reported. Said et al., reported that in 76 patients with CAFs, 55% of the patients were a symptomatic, 34% had chest pain, 13% had congestive heart failure and 1% had arrhythmia [18]. Symptoms and complications of CAFs are less common in children but more significant in adults. In the literature review and analysis by Liberthson et al., in 1979, symptoms occurred in only 19% of young patients (20 years), where as 63% of patients over the age of 20 had either symptoms ora complication due to the fistulas [21]. The most common physical finding is a heart murmur. The typical murmur of a moderate or large CAF is continuous murmur that tends to be crescendo-decrescendo in both systole and diastole, louder in diastole, however. Differential diagnosis includes persistent ductus arteriosus, pulmonary arteriovenous fistula, and ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm, ventricular septal defect with aortic valve incompetence, aorto pulmonary window, and systemic arteriovenous fistulas. Isolated systolic ordiastolic murmurs have occasionally been reported [22]. The site of maximal intensity of the murmur is related to the site of drainage. Signs of pulmonary plethora and cardiomegaly at X-ray and ECG signs of right ventricular volume overload could be noted if there is large volume of flow through a CAF that produces a left-to-right shunt. Myocardial ischemia with abnormal 201 Tl perfusion image can be detected in large portion of patients with CAF [23]. The absence of Tl perfusion defect in patients with CAF may be due to micro-fistula without evident steal phenomenon of coronary blood flow. Coronary angiography is the major diagnostic tool. It can demonstrate the size, anatomy, number, origination and termination site of the fistulas. Cardiac echocardiography is also useful for diagnosis [24-26]. Magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector computed tomography are also used to evaluate the anatomy, flow and function of CAFs [27-29].

Figure 7 Follow up echocardiography showing dilated coronary artery but no continuous Doppler flow.

Page 6: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central

Gajjar (2016)Email:

Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038 (2016) 6/8

Racial differences

Most CAFs were reported from studies in Caucasian people. Chiu et al., presented the first report of Oriental CAF patients with long-term follow-up and with a large number of patients [30]. From September, 1992 to August, 2007, 152 CAFs were detected in 28210 coronary angiograms from125 Chinese patients (incidence: 0.4%). Of the 125 patients, 58% of CAFs originated from the left anterior descending artery and 29% of CAFs originated from the right coronary artery. Most of CAFs (63%) drained to the pulmonary artery. Chiu et al., classified the CAFs into two types: type I in99 patients with 124 solitary coronary to cardiac chamber or great vessel fistula; type II: 26 patients with 28 coronary artery-left ventricular multiple micro fistulas. The incidence (0.09%) of type II CAFs in this report is significantly higher than those previous reported in Caucasian people. This incidence of type II CAFs was 0.015% in one of the largest series of 33600 consecutive angiograms [31]. Type I CAFs predominantly originated from the proximal segments (76%) and type II fistulas all originated from the mid (50%) or distal (50%) segments of the coronary artery. Single-, double-, and triple- CAFs were detected in 79%, 20%, and 1% of patients, respectively. The incidence of bilateral/multiple fistulas was also higher than those reported in Caucasian people. Coexistent coronary lesions were noted in 41% of patients. Fistula related symptoms included stable angina in 55, myocardial infarction in 2 and heart failure in 2 and sudden death with ventricular fibrillation in 1, and syncopein 1. Twenty-four (20%) of patients had coexistent congenital anomalies. Unlike those reported CAF sin Caucasian people, the most common coexistent congenital anomaly was myocardial bridge. Most patients received medical treatment because of mild symptoms. Only 9 patients underwent coronary intervention or/and surgery for CAFs.

Treatment

The management strategy of patients with CAF depends on the size of the fistula, presence of symptoms, the anatomy of the fistula, the patient’s age and whether the patient has other associated cardiovascular disorders. Small CAFs are usually asymptomatic, and may close spontaneously [32-34]. Patients with a small CAF have a good long-termprognosis and should be treated conservatively. Medical treatment with either beta blockers or calcium channel blockers is suggested [35,36]. Prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis is recommended in all CAF patients and in patients after complete fistula occlusion for at least 1 year [37]. There appears to be good consensus that all symptomatic patients should undergo closure of medium or large CAFs. Said et al., suggested surgery or percutaneous transcatheter embolization to treat patients that have moderate or large CAFs with Qp/QS ≧ 2.18. The first successful surgical closure was reported by Biörck and Carfoord in 1947 [38], where as the first therapeutic embolization was performed in 1974 by Zuberbuhler et al., [39]. Because transcatheter closure of CAF is associated with a much shorter recovery time and avoids a scar, it is considered the procedure of choice when fistula closure is indicated. Catheter closure can be performed with a variety of techniques, including detachable balloons, stainless steel coils, controlled release coils, controlled-release patent ductus arteriosus coils, patent ductus arteriosus plugs, regular and covered stents, and various

chemicals [14,40-45]. Surgical ligation should be reserved for patients who have a complex and distally located fistula, orhave adjacent vessels at risk. In addition, surgical ligation may be preferred when correction of other congenital defects or coronary artery bypass grafting is required 47. Mortality related to surgical closure or transcatheter closure of isolated CAFs is slow (1%) 48. Incomplete closure has been seen in ~10% of patients treated by catheter techniques or surgical ligation [45]. Until now, there is limited longitudinal information about the long-term prognosis of patients with CAFs following surgical or transcatheter treatment. Cheung and colleagues [6] found 96.9% of the patients in their series remained asymptomatic at the mean follow-up of 9.1 years, and approximately 10% had demonstrable recurrence of fistula without hemodynamic disturbance. Half of the patients underwent follow-up angiography, which showed a dilated and tortuous native coronary artery or more frequently showed thromboses with a short proximal stump [6,46,47]. None of our patient showed thrombosis or occlusion of coronary artery, but coronary artery remained dilated as long as 16 years after surgery. Grifka et al., reported [46], the long-term patient outcome after fistula occlusion remains unknown, but intermediate-term results reveal persistent coronary artery dilatation in many of these patients. Therefore, patients who have undergone coil occlusion of coronary fistulae require close follow-up; and, in certain cases, the use of antiplatelet therapy or low-dose anticoagulation may be warranted [46]. We have not used antiplatelet or anticoagulant in our patients.

Prognosis

Recent results of transcatheter and surgical approaches indicate a good prognosis from both techniques. Life expectancy is considered normal. However, risk of degenerative atherosclerotic disease may be higher if ectasia and dilatation of the coronary artery persist or progress.

In young surgical patients, one can anticipate the involution of the dilated segment of the feeding vessel; this is not the case in adults [6, 45-47].

CONCLUSIONCoronary cameral fistula is a rare congenital anomaly. CAF

may be isolated or in association with other cardiac defects. It may arise from one coronary system or involve both coronary systems. Fistulas draining into the coronary sinus are prone to develop congestive cardiac failure. Fistulas draining in RA/CS are prone to develop AF & its sequel. Most of the fistulas drain into the right side of the heart but it may originate from the left coronary system than the right. Cardiac cath and coronary angiography gives definitive diagnosis and planning management and to r/o other cardiac lesions. MDCT angio may replace angiography in the future for noninvasive diagnosis. Percutaneous closure is the preferred choice of closure. Surgery is indicated for lesions not amenable to percutaneous closure. Surgical closure can be done with or without CPB by ligation, tangential arteriorrhaphy or closure via cardiac chamber. Off Pump ligation technique can be used for Terminal fistula without associated anomalies. On Pump closure required in fistula draining in – RA, RV Inflow, MPA & LA or associated anomalies. Watch for ischemic changes while ligating the fistulas without CPB. Intraoperative cardioplegia

Page 7: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central

Gajjar (2016)Email:

Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038 (2016) 7/8

delivery and intraoperative trans esophageal echocardiography is helpful in assessing adequate fistula closure. Early and Long term follow up showed good outcome. With atrial fibrillation, long term follow up showed right ventricular dysfunction and tricuspid regurgitation. Severe coronary artery dilatation (>10 mm) may warrant anticoagulation with warfarin, especially in patients with sluggish coronary flow, although there is little information available concerning the risk of coronary thrombosis in this group.

REFERENCES1. Liberthson RR, Sagar K, Berkoben JP, Weintraub RM, Levine FH.

Congenital coronary arteriovenous fistula. Report of 13 patients, review of the literature and delineation of management. Circulation. 1979; 59: 849-854.

2. Haller JA Jr, Little JA. Diagnosis and surgical correction of congenital coronary artery-coronary sinus fistula. Circulation. 1963; 27: 939-942.

3. Balanescu S, Sangiorgi G, Castelvecchio S, Medda M, Inglese L. Coronary artery fistulas: clinical consequences and methods of closure. A literature review. Ital Heart J. 2001; 2: 669-676.

4. Sherwood MC, Rockenmacher S, Colan SD, Geva T. Prognostic significance of clinically silent coronary artery fistulas. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 407-411.

5. Davis JT, Allen HD, Wheller JJ, Chan DP, Cohen DM, Teske DW, et al. Coronary artery fistula in the pediatric age group: a 19-year institutional experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 58: 760-763.

6. Cheung DL, Au WK, Cheung HH, Chiu CS, Lee WT. Coronary artery fistulas: long-term results of surgical correction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71: 190-195.

7. Li RG, Fang WY, Shi HY, Qu XK, Chen H, Qiu XB, et al. Transcatheter coil embolization of multiple coronary artery-to-left ventricle fistulas: report of a rare case. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008; 121: 1342-1344.

8. Somers JM, Verney GI. Coronary cameral fistulae following heart transplantation. Clin Radiol. 1991; 44: 419-421.

9. Lowe JE, Adams DH, Cummings RG, Wesly RL, Phillips HR. The natural history and recommended management of patients with traumatic coronary artery fistulas. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983; 36: 295-305.

10. Benitez RM. Acquired coronary artery-pulmonary artery connection. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998; 45: 413-415.

11. Mavroudis C, Backer CL, Rocchini AP, Muster AJ, Gevitz M. Coronary artery fistulas in infants and children: a surgical review and discussion of coil embolization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63: 1235-1242.

12. Iannone L, Iannone D. Iatrogenic left coronary artery fistulato-left ventricle following PTCA: a previously unreported complication with nonsurgical management. Am Heart J. 1990; 120: 1215-1217.

13. Henzlova MJ, Nath H, Bucy RP, Bourge RC, Kirklin JK, Rogers WJ. Coronary artery to right ventricle fistula in heart transplant recipients: a complication of endomyocardial biopsy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 14: 258-261.

14. Qureshi SA. Coronary arterial fistulas. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006; 1: 51.

15. Reidy JF, Anjos RT, Qureshi SA, Baker EJ, Tynan MJ. Transcatheter embolization in the treatment of coronary artery fistulas. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18: 187-192.

16. McNamara JJ, Gross RE. Congenital coronary artery fistula. Surgery. 1969; 65: 59-69.

17. Levin DC, Fellows KE, Abrams HL. Hemodynamically significant primary anomalies of the coronary arteries. Angiographic aspects. Circulation. 1978; 58: 25-34.

18. Baim DS, Kline H, Silverman JF. Bilateral coronary artery--pulmonary artery fistulas. Report of five cases and review of the literature. Circulation. 1982; 65: 810-815.

19. Weam JT, Mettier SR, Klumpp TG, Zschiescho LJ. The nature of the vascular communication between the coronary arteries and the chambers of the heart. Am Heart J. 1933; 9:143-149.

20. Latson LA. Coronary artery fistulas: how to manage them. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 70: 110-6.

21. Zeina AR, Blinder J, Sharif D, Rosenschein U, Barmeir E. Congenital coronary artery anomalies in adults: non-invasive assessment with multidetector CT. Br J Radiol. 2009; 82: 254-261.

22. Guray U, Guray Y, Ozbakir C, Yilmaz MB, Sasmaz H, Korkmaz S. Fistulous connection between internal mammary graft and pulmonary vasculature after coronary artery bypass grafting: a rare cause of continuous murmur. Int J Cardiol. 2004; 96: 489-492.

23. Gowda RM, Vasavada BC, Khan IA. Coronary artery fistulas: clinical and therapeutic considerations. Int J Cardiol. 2006; 107: 7-10.

24. Kiuchi K, Nejima J, Kikuchi A, Takayama M, Takano T, Hayakawa H. Left coronary artery-left ventricular fistula with acute myocardial infarction, representing the coronary steal phenomenon: a case report. J Cardiol. 1999; 34: 279-284.

25. Theman TE, Crosby DR. Coronary artery steal secondary to coronary arteriovenous fistula. Can J Surg. 1981; 24: 231-233.

26. Rangel A, Chávez E, Baduí E, Díaz R, Solorio S, Verdín R, et al. Case report of association of congenital coronary fistulae with coronary atherosclerosis. Rev Invest Clin. 1995; 47: 481-486.

27. Patti G, D’Antonio L, Sedati P, Mega S, Di Sciascio G. Percutaneous closure of a pulmonary arteriovenous malformation in young patient with cryptogenic stroke. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6: e26-27.

28. Alkhulaifi AM, Horner SM, Pugsley WB, Swanton RH. Coronary artery fistulas presenting with bacterial endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60: 202-204.

29. Skimming JW, Walls JT. Congenital coronary artery fistula suggesting a “steal phenomenon” in a neonate. Pediatr Cardiol. 1993; 14: 174-175.

30. Bauer HH, Allmendinger PD, Flaherty J, Owlia D, Rossi MA, Chen C. Congenital coronary arteriovenous fistula: spontaneous rupture and cardiac tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 62: 1521-1523.

31. Oshiro K, Shimabukuro M, Nakada Y, Chibana T, Yoshida H, Nagamine F, et al. Multiple coronary LV fistulas: demonstration of coronary steal phenomenon by stress thallium scintigraphy and exercise haemodynamics. Am Heart J. 1990; 120: 217-219.

32. Cox ID, Heald SC, Murday AJ. Value of transoesophageal echocardiography in surgical ligation of coronary artery fistulas. Heart. 1996; 76: 181-182.

33. Krishnamoorthy KM, Rao S. Transesophageal echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary arteriovenous fistula. Int J Cardiol. 2004; 96: 281-283.

34. Iskandrian AS, Kimbiris D, Bemis CE, Segal BL. Coronary artery to pulmonary artery fistulas. Am Heart J. 1978; 96: 605-609.

35. McLellan BA, Pelikan PC. Myocardial infarction due to multiple coronary-ventricular fistulas. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989; 16: 247-249.

36. Cheng TO. Left coronary artery-to-left ventricular fistula: demonstration of coronary steal phenomenon. Am Heart J. 1982; 104:

Page 8: Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features ......entityof coronary cameral fistula by presenting the clinical features, morphologic aspects, diagnostic criteria, management

Central

Gajjar (2016)Email:

Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038 (2016) 8/8

Gajjar T (2016) Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula- Clinical Features, Morphologic Aspects, Diagnostic Criteria, Management Options, and Outcome. Ann Vasc Med Res 3(3): 1038.

Cite this article

870-872.

37. Wang NK, Hsieh LY, Shen CT, Lin YM. Coronary arteriovenous fistula in pediatric patients: a 17-year institutional experience. J Formos Med Assoc. 2002; 101: 177-182.

38. Muthusamy R, Gupta G, Ahmed RA, de Giovanni J, Singh SP. Fistula between a branch of left anterior descending coronary artery and pulmonary artery with spontaneous closure. Eur Heart J. 1990; 11: 954-956.

39. Biorck G, Crafoord C. Arteriovenous aneurysm on the pulmonary artery simulating patent ductus arteriosus botalli. Thorax. 1947; 2: 65-74.

40. Zuberbuhler JR, Dankner E, Zoltun R, Burkholder J, Bahnson HT. Tissue adhesive closure of aortic-pulmonary communications. Am Heart J. 1974; 88: 41-46.

41. Mavroudis C, Backer CL, Rocchini AP, Muster AJ, Gevitz M. Coronary artery fistulas in infants and children: a surgical review and discussion of coil embolization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63: 1235-1242.

42. Kirklin JW, Barrat-Boyes BG. Cardiac Surgery New York: John Wiley; 1987: 945-955.

43. Perry SB, Rome J, Keane JF, Baim DS, Lock JE. Transcatheter closure of coronary artery fistulas. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 205-209.

44. Skimming JW, Gessner IH, Victorica BE, Mickle JP. Percutaneous transcatheter occlusion of coronary artery fistulas using detachable balloons. Pediatr Cardiol. 1995; 16: 38-41.

45. Qureshi SA, Reidy JF, Alwi MB, Lim MK, Wong J, Tay J, et al. Use of interlocking detachable coils in embolization of coronary arteriovenous fistulas. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 110-113.

46. Colin J. McMahon, Michael R. Nihill, John P. Kovalchin, Charles E. Mullins, Ronald G. Grifka. Coronary Artery Fistula: Management and Intermediate-Term Outcome after Transcatheter Coil Occlusion. Tex Heart Inst J. 2001; 28: 21-25.

47. Reidy JF, Anjos RT, Qureshi SA, Baker EJ, Tynan MJ. Transcatheter embolization in the treatment of coronary artery fistulas. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18: 187-192.