Upload
john-oliver
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
African sisters education collaborativeASEC/SLDI – CAMEROONleadership Development Programme
Corporate GovernanceBy
Miki Gilbert Ngwaneh(MA International Development, UoS, UK)Coordinator, Short Professional Courses
Pan African Institute for Development – West Africa (PAID-WA) BueaE-mail: [email protected]/[email protected]
WHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT?
“The proper governance of companies will become as crucial to the world economy as the proper governing of countries…. strong corporate governance produces good social
progress. The two go together.” James Wolfensohn, 1999
Overview
What is it?…an ongoing, systematic process of implementing
effective change.
…A dynamic value-based process that ensures changes within a system, with emphasis on the capacity to achieve and sustain a desired state of affairs that is of benefit to the organisation concerned
…A deliberately planned organizational effort aimed at improving an organization’s effectiveness and efficiency
Corporate Governance
set of mechanisms used to manage the
relationships (and conflicting interests) among stakeholders, and to determine and control the strategic direction and performance of organizations (aligning strategic decisions with company values)
CG is …
Participation: the degree of involvement by stakeholders.
Fairness: the degree to which rules apply equally to everyone in a group or society.
Decency: the degree to which the formation and stewardship of the rules is undertaken without humiliating or harming people.
Accountability: the extent to which actors are responsible to a group or society for what they say and do.
Transparency: the degree of clarity and openness with which decisions are made.
Efficiency: the extent to which limited human and financial resources are applied without unnecessary waste, delay or corruption.
Key principles
The Rights of Shareholders; The Equitable Treatment of Shareholders; The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate
Governance; Disclosure and Transparency; and The Responsibility of the Board
Protection of shareholders’ rights and the capability of shareholders to influence behaviour of the corporation are pillars of good corporate
governance
OECD Principles of Corporate Governance
Four ideals, which should be the guiding force of organization's philosophy on Corporate Governance, are:
Transparency Accountability Disclosure Value Creation.
A strong financial and non financial disclosure regime is the heart of corporate governance
Ingredients of CG
CORPORATE GOVERANCE: WHAT IS ALL
THE FUSS ABOUT?
■ Corporate governance can destroy or create value for a firm.
■ It is concerned with:1. strengthening the effectiveness of a company’s board of directors2. verifying the transparency of a firm’s operations 3. enhancing accountability to shareholders4. incentivizing executives 5. maximizing value-creation for stakeholders and shareholders
OPENING CASE
Increase the level of trust among members;
Ensure satisfaction and commitment amongst stakeholders involved;
Confront and diagnose organizational problems and difficulties instead of neglecting them;
Ensure effectiveness in group dynamics and helps to resolve both internal and external conflicts;
Provide a level ground for collaboration and cooperation amongst the individual members.
To improve quality services rendered
Why Corporate Governance?
Why Corporate Governance?
Better access to external finance Improved company performance –
sustainability Higher firm valuation and share
performance Reduced risk of corporate crisis and
scandals
Corporate governance also matters to organisations for the following reasons: Avoidance of business scandals, which
damage trust in business. Value placed on good corporate governance
by institutional investors. Growing involvement of the private sector in
service delivery. Need for systems to prevent and deter
corruption
Why CG matters
Willingness and capacity to engage Knowledge and skills Democracy, transparency and accountability I Incentives and sanctions
Factors for effective CG
Trucker (1984) identifies four crucial components of corporate governance: Setting corporate direction Involvement in executive action Supervision of management Accountability
Components of CG
Accountability
Fairness
Transparency
Independence
Pillars of CG
Accountability
Ensure that management is accountable to the Board
Ensure that the Board is accountable to shareholders
Fairness
Protect Shareholders rights
Treat all shareholders including minorities, equitably
Provide effective redress for violations
Transparency
Ensure timely, accurate disclosure on all material matters, including the financial situation, performance,
ownership and corporate governance
Independence
Procedures and structures are in place so as to minimise, or avoid completely conflicts of interest
Independent Directors and Advisers i.e. free from the influence of others
Break up into 3 groups and let each group work on any of
the following:a. List the characteristics of good corporate governanceb. List the characteristics of bad corporate governancec. Outline measures that can be used to ensure good
corporate governance
10 minutes for preparation5 minutes for presentation
5 minutes for group-based feedback
Group exercise
Attributes of good CG
Role and Powers of management.
Legislation Management
Environment Management Skills Organisational
Induction and Training Organisational
Meetings
Organisational Resources
Code of Conduct Strategy setting Financial and
Operational Reporting Monitoring the
institutional Performance
Audit Committee Risk Management
Integrity of the Management Ability of the Board Adequacy of the Process Quality of Corporate Reporting Participation of Stakeholders
Factors of quality CG
LET’S CHECK OUT FOR THE RACI MODEL
CG and links to Roles and Responsibilities
Role & Responsibility
Charting (RACI)
Using the RACI charting system to identify, plan, manage and accomplish your roles and
responsibilities.
There were four people named:
EVERYBODY SOMEBODY ANYBODY, and NOBODY
Why do we need RACI – A Story
There was an important job to
be done and EVERYBODY was asked to do it...
EVERYBODY was sure that SOMEBODY would do it...
Why do we need RACI? Cont’d
ANYBODY could have done it,
but NOBODY did it!
SOMEBODY got angry about that, because it was EVERYBODY’s job!
Why do we need RACI? Cont’d
EVERYBODY thought that
ANYBODY could do it, but NOBODY realised that EVERYBODY wouldn’t do it!
Why do we need RACI? Cont’d
It ended up that EVERYBODY
blamed SOMEBODY when NOBODY did what ANYBODY could have done …
...sounds familiar?
Why do we need RACI? Cont’d
A systematic and participative technique to:
Identify all functions (activities, tasks, and decisions) that have to be accomplished for effective operation
Clarify roles and individual levels of participation in relation to each function
Develop best methods for individuals to fill these roles
So What is RACI Charting?
ASEC Experience with Roles and Responsibilities List the different situations where work was not
carried out because it was unclear who had to do it
List the different situations where 2 or more people were trying to carry out the same task
What are the results of working in a team with unclear roles and responsibilities
Working time: 15 mins Reporting time: 5 mins
Exercise
“My boss always overrules my decisions
whenever he/she wants” “The approval process for even the simplest item
took so long today” “It seems every department has someone putting
together a spreadsheet on the same data” “Things are always slipping through the cracks” “I have the responsibility, but not the authority,
to get the job done”
Unclear Roles and Responsibilities Result in Comments Like These...
Clear roles and responsibilities can be identified through RACI charting
Increased productivity through well defined
accountability
Increased capacity by eliminating overlaps and redundancies
Less confusion/misunderstandings by encouraging teamwork
Therefore, With Clear Roles and Responsibilities, We Should Expect to See...
Streamlined work process by eliminating
unnecessary interfaces and assigning ‘accountability’ where it belongs
Improved organization effectiveness by allowing stakeholders to cooperate and share responsibility
Therefore, With Clear Roles and Responsibilities, We Should Expect to See...
RACI - Definitions
Responsible
Accountable
Consult
Inform
These are the individuals who actually complete the
task or activity and are responsible for action and/or implementation. Responsibility is often shared, with each individual’s degree of responsibility determined by the individual with the “A”.
RESPONSIBLE: Do The Job. Execute.
R: Responsible
A: Accountable
C: Consult
I: Inform
This is the individual who carries the “yes” or “no” authority and has full veto power for an activity. It is important to clarify the levels of accountability and to distinguish between management accountability and operational accountability. Only one “A” can be assigned to a task or activity and authority must accompany accountability.
ACCOUNTABLE: Make the Decision. Take Ultimate Ownership.
R: Responsible
A: Accountable
C: Consult
I: Inform
These are the individuals who must be consulted prior to a final decision or action. “Consult” implies TWO-WAY communication.
CONSULT: Communication Before. In The Loop.
R: Responsible
A: Accountable
C: Consult
I: Inform
These are the individuals who need to be informed after a decision or action is taken because they, in turn, may take action or make a decision based on the output. “Inform” is FYI or FYA and implies only ONE-WAY communication..
INFORM: Need To Know. Do Not Change The Decision.
R: Responsible
A: Accountable
C: Consult
I: Inform
The Output RACI Matrix Can Initially Look Quite Complex
RACI’s provide lots of information in a very simple format
R CA I
R CA
I
C
CI
R A
IR CA
R CA I
RCA I
I
R
C
A
Roles of Participants
Decisions or
Activities
RACI – ASEC Project Conception and Implementation Phase
Activity Executive Director
BODCommittee
HeadsCSO
Members
Determine the aims of the project and develop the GPP R/A I C
Design the project R/A C
Approve it for implementation C R/A I
Develop the SPP I C R/A
Implement the project R/A C I
Monitor and report progress R R/A C I
Evaluate the project for results R/A I I I
RACI Charting Choose one project e.g
ASEC Leadership workshop
And provide the required RACI chart for its conception and implementation
Working time: 15 minutes Reporting time: 5minutess
Exercise
Identify work process
Determine the decisions and activities to chart
Prepare a list of roles or people involved in those tasks
Develop the RACI chart
Get feedback and buy-in (validate)
The 5-Step Process
Start with high impact areas first Don’t chart process that will soon change Work process must be well defined:
Fewer than ten activities implies the definition is too narrow
Greater then 25 activities implies definition is too broad
Step 1: Identify work process
Step 2: Determine the decisions and activities to chart
Avoid obvious, generic or ambiguous activities, such Attend Meetings
Each activity or decision should begin with a good action verb e.g.
Evaluate Schedule Write Record Determine
Operate Monitor Prepare Update Collect
Approve Conduct Develop Inspect Train
Publish Report Review Authorize Decide
Step 2: Determine the decisions and activities to chart,
cont’d
When the action verb implies a judgment or decision (e.g. evaluate, monitor, inspect, review) add a phrase to indicate the primary outcome. Examples “Monitor phone service handling of customer
requests to identify training needs” “Analyze data to locate source of delay”
Activities or decisions should be short, concise, and apply to a role or need, and in general not to a specific person
Roles can be individual roles or group roles
Roles can include people outside the organisation
Roles may be based on the “current state" of the organisation or the “future state" depending on your purpose
Step 3: Prepare List of Functional Roles
As a general rule, first assign R’s then determine
who has the A, then complete C’s and I’s
The ideal group size is four to ten people
For larger groups or more complex projects, an independent facilitator is required
Meeting time can be significantly reduced if a “straw model” list of decisions and activities is completed prior to meeting
Step 4: Develop the RACI chart
Step 4: Develop the RACI chart, cont’d
AI
A
A
A
R
R
R
RR
R C
C
C
I
I
IR RActivities, Tasks or decisions
Functional Roles
A
Chart Review - Vertical Analysis
Many R's
No empty spaces
No R's or A's
Too many A's
Qualifications
Too many "R's" could signal a work over-load situation.
Too many "R's" could signal a work over-load situation.
Functional Roles
Activities
CA IR C
IC
CR A
I CAR CA IRCA I
IR A
Chart Review - Vertical Analysis, cont’d
Lots of R's Can the functional role stay on top of so much? Can the decision / activity be broken into smaller, more manageable functions?
No Empty Spaces Does the individual(s) need to be involved in so many activities? Could ‘management by exception’ principles be used, perhaps reducing C's to I's?
No R's or A's Should this functional role be eliminated? Have processes changed to a point where resources should be re-utilized?
Too many A's Does a proper "segregation of duties” exist? Should other groups be accountable for some of these activities to ensure checks and balances and accurate decision making throughout the process? Is this a “bottleneck” in the process and is everyone waiting for decisions or direction?
Qualifications Does the type or degree of participation fit the qualifications of the functional role?
If You Find: Then Ask:
Chart Review - Horizontal Analysis
Functional Roles
Activities
CA IR C
IC
CR A
I CAR CA IRCA I
IR A
Many R's
Too many A's
Many C's
Many I's
Too many “R's" could signal "over the wall" activities: "Just get it off my desk ASAP!”
Too many “R's" could signal "over the wall" activities: "Just get it off my desk ASAP!”
Chart Review - Horizontal Analysis, cont’d
No R's Is job getting done? Some roles may be waiting to approve, be consulted, or informed. No one sees their role to take the initiative.
Too many R’s Is this a sign of “over the wall” activities? “Just get it off my desk ASAP!”
No A's Why not? There must be an 'A'. Accountability should be pushed down to the most appropriate level.
Too many A’s Is there confusion? “I thought you had it!” It also creates confusion because every person with an “A” has a different
view of how it is or should be done.
Too few A’s & R’s The process must slow down while the activity is performed on an “ad hoc” basis. Or the procedure may be outdated or it can be
streamlined if not needed.
Lots of C's Do all the functional roles really need to be consulted? Are there justifiable benefits in consulting all the functional roles?
Lots of I's Do all the functional roles need to be routinely informed or only in exceptional circumstances?
If You Find: Then Ask:
Distribute the RACI chart to everyone
represented on the chart but not present in the development meeting
Capture their changes and revise chart as appropriate
Reissue revised RACI chart
Update as necessary on a on-going basis
Step 5: Get feedback and buy-in
A follow-up meeting may be necessary if significant changes are made
A follow-up meeting may be necessary if significant changes are made
Place Accountability (A) and Responsibility (R) at the
lowest feasible level.
There can be only one accountable individual per activity
Authority must accompany accountability
Minimize the number of Consults (C) and Informs (I)
All roles and responsibilities must be documented and communicated
Discipline is needed to keep the roles and responsibilities clear.
“Drift” happens. RACI has to be revisited periodically, especially when symptoms of role confusion reappear
R A C I - Closing Guidelines
MY LEADERSHIP
Click icon to add picture
1. Has a great PURPOSE in life.
The Leader. . .
PREPARING OUR HEARTS
a. What are your burdens?
b. What are your spiritual gifts?
c. What are your natural talents?
d. What are your desires and passions?
e. What do others affirm about you?
f. What are your dreams and visions?
g. What’s most fulfilling to you?
h. What opportunities are in front of you?
Do you know your Purpose?
Character…a. Communicates CREDIBILITY.b. Harnesses RESPECT.c. Creates CONSISTENCY.d. Earns TRUST.
2. Has removed any HINDRANCE from his life.
Leaders must choose to:a. Develop personal DISCIPLINE.b. Develop a personal SECURITY & IDENTITY.c. Develop personal CONVICTIONS, VALUES and
ETHICS.
Three attitudes of total surrender:
a. We must have nothing to PROVE.
b. We must have nothing to LOSE.
c. We must have nothing to HIDE.
3. Has placed him completely at DISPOSAL
Common Traits of People of Faith:
a. Visionb. Confidence c. Hungerd. Resolve e. Dreams
4.Has a FAITH that expects results
It always starts with a need.
a. That need sparks passion within a person.b. That person acts in response to the need.c. This action moves others to cooperate.
5. Chooses to SERVE in attitude and action.
Leaders naturally arise
through this order:1. identifies a primary gift.2. develop that gift.3. match that gift with a place of service.4. provides a platform for influence.5. flourishes because of the gift.
6. Stirs up the GIFTS in themselves and others.
7. Is SECURE enough to empower others.
SECURE LEADERSa. The secure are into service deliveryb. The secure draw strength from identity.c. The secure pursue service to others.d. The secure want to add value to others.
INSECURE LEADERSa. The insecure are into
titlesb. The insecure draw
strength from imagec. The insecure pursue
statusd. The insecure want to
gain value from others
8. Has chosen to be an EXAMPLE before he leads
others.
CONCLUSION
Click icon to add picture
1. People are insecure.
Give them confidence.
2. People like to feel special.
Honor them.
3. People look for a better tomorrow
Give them hope.
4. People need to be understood.
Listen to them.
5. People lack direction.
Navigate for them.
6. People are needy.
Speak to their hearts first.
7. People get emotionally low.
Encourage them.
8. People want to succeed.
Help them win.
9. People desire relationships.
Provide community.
10.People seek models to follow.
Be an example.
Open Forum And Evaluation
Thanks
For Your Kind Attention