Upload
conor
View
51
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Corporate Safety Crimes Recent prosecutions following fatalities at Work. Presented by: Craig McAdam 2013. Investigating Fatalities. Following a fatality Police HSE Coroner CPS Time Scales Witnesses Employees Supervisors Managers Directors The Company. The Offences. POLICE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Corporate Safety CrimesRecent prosecutions following fatalities at WorkPresented by:
Craig McAdam 2013
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Investigating Fatalities
1. Following a fatality► Police ► HSE► Coroner► CPS► Time Scales
2. Witnesses► Employees► Supervisors► Managers► Directors► The Company
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
The Offences
POLICE
• Gross Negligent Manslaughter Common Law• Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate
Homicide Act 2007
HSE
• HASAWA s. 2 and 3• HASAWA s. 7 and s.37
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Corporate Manslaughter & Corporate Homicide Act 2007
• Enacted 6th April 2008
• “A revolution in the way in which companies can and will be prosecuted
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Elements of the Offence
• Qualifying Organisation• Causes a Persons death• Relevant Duty of Care• Gross Breach of that Duty• Managed or Organised by Senior Management
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Qualifying Organisations
• A Corporation• A Department or Body Listed in Schedule 1• A Police Force or Government Department• A Partnership, Trade Union or Employers
Association that is an Employer
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Causation & Relevant Duty of Care
• Gross Breach of Duty of Care by Senior Management
• More than a mere contribution to the death• Clarification of role of Judge and Jury in Crown
Court
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
The Breach
• Must fall “far below” what could reasonably be expected of the organisation in the circumstances – s1(4)(b)
• Factors for the Jury to Consider – s8• How serious was the breach – s8(2)(a)• How much of a risk of death it posed – s8(2)(b)• Other considerations – s8(3)• Forseeability?
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Aggravating Factors
• More than one death, or very grave personal injury in addition to death
• Failure to heed warnings and advice• Failure to respond to “near misses” • Cost-cutting at the expense of safety• Deliberate failure to obtain or comply with
relevant licenses• Injury to a vulnerable person
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Mitigating Factors
• Prompt acceptance of responsibility• High level of co-operation with the investigation• Genuine efforts to remedy the defect• A good Health & Safety Record• Responsible attitude towards health & safety
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
The Cases
Regina v Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd [2011]The Indictment
1. Gross Negligence Manslaughter - Peter Eaton
2. Corporate Manslaughter, CMCHA 2007 - Cotswold
3. s2(1) Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 - Cotswold
4. s37 Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 – Peter Eaton
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
The Cases• Convicted Winchester Crown Court – 15th
February 2011• Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence
refused by LCJ’s Court 11th May 2011• Fined £385,000• “It may well be that the fine in terms of its payment will put
this company into liquidation. If that is the case it is unfortunate but unavoidable. It is a consequence of the breach.”
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
The Cases
• Regina v JMW Farms Ltd [2012]
• Convicted Belfast Crown Court - 8th May 2012
• £187,500 Fine + £13,000 costs • “The New Corporate Manslaughter legislation
clarifies the criminal liabilities of companies where serious failures in the management of health and safety result in a fatality. I would therefore urge anyone with a managerial or supervisory role to ensure that proper management and control systems are in place to prevent another needless death from occurring”
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
The Cases
• Regina v Lion Steel Ltd [2012]
• Convicted Manchester Crown Court – 20th July 2012
• £480,000 Fine + £84,000 Costs
• “There was a gross breach of duty by the company... This company, while doing something to deal with the obvious risks, did far less than was required”
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Sentencing
• Unlimited Fine – s1(6)• Remedial Order – s9• Publicity Order – s10
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Unlimited Fine - Relevant Factors• Means of the Defendant are relevant & Court
should require financial information• Fixed correlation between the fine & either
turnover or Profit is NOT appropriate• Effect on the employment of the innocent MAY be
relevant• Effect on shareholders or Directors will NOT be
relevant• The likelihood of prices charged by the defendant
being raised will not ordinarily be relevant• Effect on the provision of services to the public
will be relevant• Liability for civil compensation is NOT relevant• Cost of any remedial order is NOT relevant• Whether the fine will have the effect of putting
the defendant out of business will be relevant; in some bad cases this may be an acceptable consequence
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Actual Figures
• Corporate Manslaughter requires a gross breach at senior level and will ordinarily involve a level of seriousness significantly greater than a health & safety offence
• Appropriate fine will seldom be less than £500,000 and may be measured in millions of pounds
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Actual Figures
• Health & safety cases will involve a far greater range of levels of seriousness. Where the offence is shown to have caused death however the appropriate fine will seldom be less than £100,000 and may be measured in hundreds of thousands of pounds or more
• In all cases defendants ought to be ordered to pay prosecution costs
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Other Orders
• Remedial Orders- available for both Corporate Manslaughter & HSWA
offences- must be specific enough to be enforceable
• Publicity Orders- available for Corporate Manslaughter only- should ordinarily be imposed
- Court may specify the form of the announcement, a particular
newspaper and the number of insertions
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
So where are we now…?
• To what extent are the new powers being used?
• What next?
Reputation & Results™
© Slater & Gordon Limited 2012
Recent Decisions
• S.7 – HGV Driver – - sentence to 24 week custodial suspended for two years after reversing backwards and fatally injuring a co worker
• General Motors – s.2 and PUWER 1998 11(1) following fatality at the plant in July 2010 – a risk assessment in 2010 had identified a risk which wasn’t acted on - £150,000 fine and £19,654 costs.
• Prestige Construction – worker fell through skylight – serious spinal injuries but made a full recovery, guilty plea to reg.6(3) of the work at height regs and reg.23(2) CDM regs - £30,000 and £9,000 costs.